I assume you're probably right, but then what are they going to call it when they're actually rust free? rust free for real this time?
Rant:
||
Just because they compiled it to a different target doesn't make it rust free.
That would be like me saying I made windows x86 free because I ran it on a translation layer on ARM, even though the source is still C++
Plus if you know about the compiler architecture of rust, it's not like compiling to x86 or arm is uniquely different to wasm.
Especially because it's not like Rust actually compiles to either of them anyway, it compiles to LLVM-IR which then compiles down to x86/arm/wasm.
I completely understand the migration should be done in stages towards JS-Native, and using wasm as an intermediary step is a good choice. But calling it Rust free when it's objectively not is really annoying me - especially when I still get Rust errors in production often.
||