#Advancements replacing NBT checks
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
<@&1201956957406109788>
💬 While you wait, take this time to provide more context and details.
🙇 After a while, hit the Summon Helpers button to ping the helper team. They'll be happy to help you
✅ Once your question has been resolved (or you no longer need it), please click Resolve Question or run /resolve
It is less efficient to have advancements (or predicates, which most advancements use inline) for NBT checks than it is to do an nbt check in the target selector
Now it's marginal, and there's some cases where many would argue the convenience outweighs the cost, but it's gonna depend on your use-case.
This thread has been inactive for some time, so I'm going to archive it.
If you're still using the thread, just send a message and it'll pop back on the thread list.