Rifles have too much smoke

[robust swallow]

WHO uses full auto on range anyways

[pulsar eagle]

People...
Are you one of those who like to deny obvious things?
Look at and study the images presented.

[robust swallow]

No I’m not lol. But u really rarely use full auto on range

[pulsar eagle]

At what range (meters) do you recommend using full auto fire?
Full auto doesn't even work in CQB situations🤦‍♂️

[robust swallow]

Hip fire

[broken wing]

Long range: double tap. Mid range: double tap. Short range: double tap. CQB: double tap.

[robust swallow]

Ads is way too slow

[robust swallow]

Real.

And 1 tap with Sigma Chad G3, Fal and Kebab rifles

[pulsar eagle]

CQB:
You: double tap... double tap...
Enemy: Full auto
You: * Dead *

[safe junco]

fal should really get a smoke reduction yeah

[robust swallow]

Well it’s old and Rusty so

Only militia and ins have it

It gives a vibe. Not everything should be too QOL

[valid stag]

Rifles do have too much smoke and saying "who uses full auto" isn't a valid argument against this man

You really should be able to see the person you're shooting at

[robust swallow]

In CQB where your 1-20m away it’s not that bad. And at very short ranges it’s bad to ADS. So hip fire will be better. This alone gives u more visibility and the full auto recoil on range will also prevent u to hit shots accurate.

I’ve never had an issue with smoke

[valid stag]

This is a perfectly reasonable range to use ads and as you can see, you can't see

Idk why people shifting to talking about when you should use ads and hip fire to begin with, it's irrelevant

[robust swallow]

You will still hit your shots tho

I think it looks pretty cool to have that much smoke

[random spire]

You should be able to see through it

[valid stag]

You might just miss your first shot and not see that the enemy moved so you're dumping into a wall. I don't get why you like it so much. It's literally blocking your vision of something 5 meters from you

[random spire]

You shouldn’t have to use hip fire because of a visual affect

[valid stag]

Its worse when you're out in the wild and not in a building

The smoke is okay, just make it so we can see..

[robust swallow]

I never had an issue with it but ok, if so many ppl complain than they could make it a tiny bit lighter

[valid stag]

Yes exactly

[restive roost]

Developers should allow a change that would lower the TTK? Oh, boy, do I have news for you. The tards in the suits decided that TTK is the most important value in the game, if anything they will increase the size of the smoke.

[valid stag]

This has nothing to do with TTK

[robust swallow]

Wut?

I think your in the wrong suggestion post

[restive roost]

All of the recent updates are focused at increasing TTK. Why would devs lower the smoke which would decrease TTK? Makes no sense

They believe TTK is the holy grail that will save their company from bankruptcy

[robust swallow]

[valid stag]

TTK is not about sway or visibility. It's about assuming you hit all your shots, how long it takes to kill

Increasing visibility through smoke won't really change sway or recoils mechanics, juts makes it so you can see the person 5m from you

[restive roost]

Then I am wrong about the specific TTK part, but my meaning was that the suits decided that players need to die less easily in this game

So a mechanic that would make it easier to kill people would make no sense

[safe junco]

Okay, but it generates too much smoke

[valid stag]

Yea but at the same time they are willing to reduce some things like sway to avoid dumb situations where people dump a whole mag into the enemies direction and then stare at eachother as they reload

[pulsar eagle]

Some more screenshots with FN FAL:
And in this fight, the one with less smoke will win.
Different rifles have different smoke and the FN FAL is the smokiest.

[safe junco]

What is ttk