#MG Stryker not requiring crewman

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

errant shell
#

There are almost always strykers sitting at main forcing people to drive into combat in logis and dying over and over again. It makes no sense that we have to use crewman for stykers when vehicles like the AAVP dont need crewman even though they are more powerful. there is no incentive for a dedicated stryker squad because it just has an HMG. I think that allowing a normal squad to crew the stryker would benefit gameplay of U.S. Army because they would actually use their APC's instead of them sitting at main for the entire game.

violet bane
somber magnet
#

That Stryker should also be able to carry supply to help the team on logi duty

valid finch
#

In my opinion vehicles such as the AAVP should require crewman, even a regular Stryker can kill BTRs and solo-roam the backline of the enemy. It is still too powerful to be operated by a single player.

errant shell
crystal venture
#

Are you talking about the 7.62 one?

#

Maybe for that one it would be nice for only the driver to need crewman as a compromise

merry merlin
#

On other factions you have use APCs with 50 cals without crewman

#

Probably legacy setting on the Stryker cause its been in game for very long

#

And they never bothered to change it

crystal venture
#

ya the ZSL is fuckin OP as fuck

#

the wheeled open top pla apc

#

it obviously does not have a RWS but it's armor is really fuckin good and there are 0 crewman required for it

honest panther
#

The 50 cal stryker should 100% require the crewman kit, now maybe, like the PARS, it should only need it for the driver so it's more easily integrated into an infantry squad but that's it.

valid finch
honest panther
#

The 30 cal stryker would be fine not requiring a crewman kit but imo any closed top APC SHOULDN'T be able to be one manned in a solo squad, they should all require crewman driver. AAVP, MTLB-6MA, T-LAV.