#GPU type prioritization seems to have stopped working on 13th of March

6 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

lost edge
#

I have an endpoint with 3 cheapest GPU types selected in the order of their price (i.e. 4090 is my 3rd option). I noticed that my expenses almost doubled after 13th of March, but the billed GPU time didn't change much. It turned out that before 13th of March the usage of 4090 was close to 0 (which is what I expect - it is my 3rd option). On 13th of March 4090 usage jumped to 50-70% skyrocketing my prices. This is unexpected and unfortunately leads to additional costs for me. For now I removed 4090 as my 3rd option, but this behavior seems abnormal, thus, reaching out to you here.

astral ibexBOT
#

To help others find answers, you can mark your question as solved via Right click solution message -> Apps -> ✅ Mark Solution

lost edge
#

Now I think that GPU selection is just broken - I've removed my 3rd option (4090) completely hours ago and I still get jobs ran on 4090 as of right now and pay price of 4090. I suspect these might be old workers still cached on 4090, but it has been ~7h since I change the selection, so I expect these workers to be rescheduled or not used at all.

lost edge
#

4090 still gets 25% of billing time

proper totem
lost edge