#🎪bruh-fart
1 messages · Page 3790 of 1
i fucking love salsa
I’m not unhappy though
anybody who can post a gif is a fucking fed
remove your fake skin you fucking reptilian
The muncher
Hate lizards (not racist just don’t like em)
and flops the twink
This but it's a babyBell cheese
my grandma used to get mad at me because she'd buy the bubble tape and i'd eat it all just like that
bubble tape and big league chew have no right being as tasty as they are
Aaaaaaaahh
loved that bubble gum tape
there was a red flavor?
i used to chew so much of that my jaw would hurt so bad i would slur my sentences
hello
no perms yet
The only way to eat Hubba Bubba:
thats way too much
fucking vile way to eat hubba bubba
there was this green flavor i fucked with
you're right... you need to stick the entire thing in your mouth at once
my lord you will fuck up your jaw so much doing that
or make it stronger
you seem like the kinda guy to lose teeth to caramel apples

kakistocracy
noun
"rule by the worst"
is retardation and shit taste a prerequisite for the mod and helper roles?
damn shame the only ones posting shit here are you and iedy
i do not regret not whitelisting helpers from the blacklisting
i do hope it strikes you down someday

like soldiers in an encircled position getting airdropped supplies
but it's all rotten food and frozen pizza with pineapple
and, like, kholodets
whoever decided to make cold tasteless jello into a dish needs to be locked away
@dreamy flax what the helly is a khodolets
probably the british
A "khodolets" typically refers to a type of traditional Russian folk doll, often used as a talisman or decoration. These dolls are made from natural materials and are seen as symbols of good luck and protection. They can be adorned with various designs and colors, representing different themes or seasons.
If you meant something else, feel free to clarify! 😊
has to be, they are literal culinary terrorists
@dreamy flax what the helly is a kholodets
Kholodets is a traditional dish from Eastern Europe, particularly popular in Russia and Ukraine. It's a type of jellied meat dish made by slow-cooking meat (often pork or beef) in water, then cooling the broth until it thickens into a jelly-like consistency.
Kholodets is typically served cold and can include chunks of meat, vegetables, and spices. It's often accompanied by horseradish or mustard for added flavor. 🍽️🥩
The jello comes from the bones
Alright, I did not need to know that
When the stuff gets boiled down
as if german cuisinie is free of abominations
don't y'all have a holiday where you eat raw ground beef or something?
or maybe it's ground pork
- It's not a holiday
- I have not once eaten it
- It does sadly exist though, yes
Bread with some sort of ground beef
But if I had to choose between meat chunks, vegetables and spices floating in a fucking tub of jello and ground beef on a piece of bread, I already know which one I will choose
Oh that raw beef and onion sandwhich thing, I've seen that
I mean, can't be any worse than boiled bull testicles
Guys im out of the loop, why no images on this server anymore?
Someone posted bad things for 3 hours
Ouch
Mods took away perms till they have a fix
Cant have shit in the zone
And with multiple alt accounts
Fix is almost here
I got tired of explaining
Was it illegal shit or?
Just gore
Yikes
The same gif spammed x100 times

He's probably in here waiting for us to give the news
give me photo perms cuz i asked
i am going to devour a jar of pickled eggs
pickled eggs are goated
shits gas
shit gives you gas
they really understated the hot on these eggs
that actually hurts
also these fucking suck
i give it 0 big booms
they arent even pickled all the way
these shit ass eggs are turning me racist
quarter pickled eggs because fuck you
those were so fucking shit
my grandpa is the only person i trust to pickle an egg
there were 20
i ate 2 and threw them away
they really just made them hot as fuck cuz they knew they were ass
i was already racist
theres always just that one random guy you know whos the only fucker within 300 miles to pickle eggs perfectly
theres a guy my dad has not fired just cause he makes pickled quail eggs exactly how he likes them
Lol, just read some peak irony, American idiot, Charlie Kirk who's a outspoken Second Amendment supporter AND a jackass that said "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single years so that we can have the 2nd amendment" mc'fucking died from getting shot in the neck during his speech

the price of freedom is responsibility. we also need the second amendment to fight the government, or we're gonna turn into Western Europe
Also very notable quote “I can’t stand the word ‘empathy,’ actually.
I think ‘empathy’ is a made-up new-age term that does a lot of damage.”
- Charlie Kirk
really? Weird, ya got a fasist leading your country and a WHOLE GAGGLE of corrupt politicians... Where's the whitehouse siege?
The powers that be make everyone think they can't do anything
and so far, they've kept the uprising down
soooo the only value your second amendment has is to enable school shooters and give the police a bloated budget, got it
ok make owning all guns illegal
uh oh, criminals still have guns
oopsie doodles
now law abiding citizens have no defense
you're an idiot
I'm not saying to make them illegal
that's the endgame of all 2nd amendment abolitionists
actually, I'm not stating ANYTHING about my stance on gun rights right now, that's you coming up with that one, but to put it on the record:
DON'T MAKE GUNS ILLEGAL, GET MORE GUN CONTROL TO STOP RETARDS FROM BUYING GUNS
if you give the government the power to restrict gun ownership, they're going to restrict everybody from getting guns
That's an interesting point. Who decides which people to disqualify from purchasing guns?
you think owning guns is illegal in the EU? I can go out and buy a firearm now, only difference is there is gonna be an EXTENCINVE screening before I get it, and as a civilian I am only allowed to own a certain class of firearms
got a criminal record?
No Gun
Got mental health issues?
No Gun
i fucking hate things that are hot to be hot
or they get them from overseas
that's literally the same here
the spice and the taste of the pickled egg were completely seperate
shit is still pissing me off
it dont work
I don't live in the US, thus I don't really care about the gun restrictions set there but I do know that even with the most intensive background checks, you'd still have missing links.
Take mental health issues for example, they can occur later on, after you were greenlit on the purchase of a gun, it's impossible to completely eradicate every single weak link in a system that is still handled by humans.
That's interesting. I seem to recall that the stated purpose of the justice system is to rehabilitate people. What's the point of rehabilitating someone just to make them a second class citizen once they've served their sentence? In my opinion, non violent felons who have been rehabilitated should absolutely be permitted to own firearms AND vote. Unfortunately, this is not currently the case.
people who are criminals will just own them illegally and those who have mental issues will still own them as those who enforce dont pry that much
let me put it this way, I don't know excatly how your shitass government works, what I do know is that the US is the leading country in gun violence.
Making guns illegal is never gonna work, duuuuhhh
But EU has strict gun ownership laws that still allows civilians to own and use guns
gun control is just a fucking waste of breath in the us
better off just having everyone armed
As for mental issues, that's a slippery slope into discrimination, and could easily be abused to keep guns from the hands of high functioning individuals. That's certainly what happened with red flag laws.
Define mental illness. Certain sexualities have been labeled mental illnesses, as recently as 40 years ago.
red flag laws make me cringe
as 90 percent of the time its just exes and divorces
yeah as long as criminals exist, there's going to be gun crime
it's a society problem
not a legislation problem
Yeah, it's straight up dystopian shit. "There's a small possibility that you might commit a crime at some point, so we're going to confiscate your property"
its fucking insane
we have a debilitating mental heath crisis
and its never out of genuine concern its always he said she said
like its tearing us apart actively
says the guy frm the only country where shootings are a normal thing and not a massive, once in a decade social crisis
Edit: the only FIRST WORLD country
its not they try everything in their power to fuck over lawful gun owner
every gun law only affects those who legally own weapons
they make laws constantly trying to fuck over legal owners
correlation =/= causation
but that's what's funny, criminals don't listen to laws
if you had multiple felonys why the fuck would you care what was legal
you cant even own a gun to begin with
why respect the retarded stock laws
they only affect legal owners
it's amazing how people immediately assume that when you talk about fixing a problem you're only supposed to do it from a single direction...
the issue is you cant fix it without arming the rest of the population
I’m straight strokin it viciously rn
only real thing ever said in this chat
whats this about
who up cybering they punk
gun "control"
this is also not the solution lol
no comment, not american
Same brother, same.
name checks out
that should be the default response if you arent american
I concur, penis man
wanted to laugh about a funny bit of irony, the american side of chat decided it's supposed to be a discussion about gun control.
Note to self, never talk about gun rights with americans
why, did someone non american join in on the conversation
per usual
oh
Switzerland seems to have this problem down. Thing is it involves massive societal differences, the U.S. has never been a high trust society
Btw whatever you do, do NOT abbreviate Cyberpunk
okay.
It absolutely is. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.
cp2077
you have 2077 of them on your hard drive?
HAAAAAAANNKK!!!!!!
"HANK, HAAAAANNK NO, DONT ABBREVIATE CYBERPUNK"
damn
You retards do know he used a bolt action right. Not even Giffords would dare ban that
guess why we aren't high trust 
I 100% agree that an armed society is a polite society, but you shouldn't be handing out guns left and right lol
I LOVE CP (2077) RAHHH 
who up willying they wonka
its 100 percent a moral issue
Don't for even a second take that where I think you are cause I will dismantle that shit so quick
the issue being people dont value others lives
stats don't lie
you could just say we never had a homogeneous population its ok
we know what you mean lol
you want a melting pot, you get killing

us keeping guns were orginally for response against tryanicall government
its now just against other citizens
it still is
still is definitely
Obviously not left and right. Maybe just up and down.
cant someone commit a shooting with a bolt action though, on top of a roof or out of a window lee harvey oswald style?
yeah very easily
Lee Harvey didn't act alone tho.
there was that one guy
except lee harvery didnt do the shooting
He was A shooter, but definitely not the only one.
bit more difficult with a manually operated weapon, obviously
the cia killed kennedy
what I get here is the solution isnt to ban or control guns, because criminals can get them illegaly too
yep
I concur.
you can get a bolt action to fire very rapidly with the right technique
and still be accurate
there is a technique to fire bolt actions fast
those who can be trusted and are of moral upstandingness or some shit can own guns and protect themselves and others
its called the "mad minute"
but that rearely happejns
It was obviously John Wilkes Booth.
I'm still mad about his death and I wasn't even born when it happened
the cia that staged vampire attacks to take control of a country
its done by holding the bolt with the trigger and thumb while the middle finger pulls the trigger on the lee enfield
so yeah, operating a bolt action fast is possible
I want a fucking slamfire shotgun
put super saftey on ar12
but they are fun
not trying to never own a gun again
That seems like something a fed would say...
ar12 w/ 20rnd magazine + super safety is the walmart aa12 solution
and cheaper than scam fire
and legal
Luty played with his homemade SMG for months before getting caught by being stupid
just don't be stupid
i could make a fuck ton of auto sears
Hmmm the federal agent is trying to peer pressure me... And it's working. Time to pay a visit to Home Depot.
but i wont because it will eventually catch up to me
real
most people only get caught cause they have the subliminal desire to be recognized for what they did
thing about gun control, I find it ridiculous, ted kaszcinsky made a 22 single shot bolt action out of an air gun barrel that had a 22. bore, aluminum pieces, and wood
it doesnt work
or the fucked up looking gun that killed Shinzo Abe
it just fundementallly doesnt
if information on something is accesible enough it cannot be contained
brandon herrera did a video on it, it did, but its slow and unconventional
but its still lethal
yes
shinzo abe is very dead
Bro the DOD literally published an IED / pipe gun tutorial. You can buy that shit on Amazon.
the anarchists guide or sum
no
i was boutta say
was that a wire fired black powder or was it a shotgun shell in those?
No, it's literally published and credited to the DOD lmao
that guide is a one way stop to maiming yourself
I mean yeah, if you were dumb enough to follow it
yep
The anarchists' cookbook was made by the CIA in an attempt to foil terrorist's plots by giving them faulty explosives recipes making them way too sensitive
This whole chat is bait you're all feds trying to get me to engage
causing them to main/kill said terrorists
the moral is people who want to do harm to others will find any way to commit that
I'm literally a european, no fed here
we are all the same federal agent jumping between desks
Super fed 🫵
Non percent chance the charlie shooter is a gamma user
this ones the fed
those who talk about feds the most are usually feds
maybe
Ya think in the helldiver's universe they have super feds monitoring super brain fart
for sure
bro fuck amazon
cold take
fuck ass ai bitch aint even got david bowie
pirate music like a man
its just convinient telling your ai concubine to play whatever music you want
on the alexa your dad owns and you dont
true, clankers do not deserve rights!
I want bezos to hear me ask Alexa for fart jokes
concubine implies you can fuck it
i want bezos to listen to me jerk my shit while i make alexa make fart noises for 5 hours
oh good god

im too drunk this alexa whore is yapping instead of playing my music
i wish i could fucking strike her
oh good god
tell her to play a song and bezos starts talking about paying 19.80 a month to play the song and playing it anyways after saying no
someone strap a pumping fleshlight on alexa
jarvis..
you say a song and an artist and it plays some cover by some random cuck
oh wow a cover
im gonna fucking smash this thing
slave employees and billions cant even afford rights to stream songs
dog is trying to calm me down cuz he knows im pissed off
you can build a .458 8.5" ar pistol for like $800
well 50 beowulf is fucking ass
and then put an binary in it
it was made to shoot out engine blocks
and it only refers to its case diameter
the higher the number only means the higher the diameter
you can put a 50 cal in a 12 gauge shotgun and it fits perfectly
an smg in 50 beowulf sounds impractical as fuck
bro whatever the fuck im seing for a 50 beowulf smg looks like a concussion and shoulder pain machine
its such a fucking impractical round
the chimera arms mauleer
is the only attempt ive seen at a 50 beowulf smg
and it looks like a fucking nightmare to shoot
there's a reason there's no other attempts to make a 50 beo smg
theres a reason why a 45 acp kriss vector is considered impracitcal
budget supplier
god an original 5.45 ak with zenitco furniture
i would sell my fucking kidneys
im waiting on the day i can buy a pak43 from them
if i didnt have to sell more kidneys for the ammo
you cant own field guns over there in america?
there's this thing called the NFA and it really makes people upset
you can own them with a license but there's a new class action going on to abolish the NFA which would destroy the license requirement
i want the nfa gone so bad
PSA is doing a fundraiser for the lawsuit with their GOA-15 lowers
what does the government do except extort money from citizens
oh you want a silencer on your legally owned firearm?
pay our bribe money or go to prison
quiet shooting is only for the rich
the tax for them is $0 now but you still need the stamp & registry
oh you put a grip on your concealed pistol making it less concealed?
the lawsuit says "why nfa exist if stamp bring no money"
now its a rifle
Fund public works projects and organize shit?
Wdym
logberal spotted
more like sit on its ass and do nothing
another 34,000 contracts to the councilman's nephew's company
Idk I think it's just libertarian free market cope to expect a country without a centralized govt to get anything done
you have to pay for those? over here in france if you're police and want a supressor for your gun you can get it no problem, since it technically improves the hearing safety
Yeah let 100000 people fight over how they want their roads to be constructed and funded
its more the fact i pay so many taxes out the ass to see no noticable improvement
to an even worsening of the current state of the country
i pay federal and state tax and both go to shit
you pay taxes so Lacquishieadareanna can support her 12 kids on no job
dont get me started on welfare
guns are fun
its just that talking about guns turns into talking about those who want to infringe and restrict
why does welfare exist
is there a better round for a short barrel 300blk
overall its just getting taken advantage of
"erm it's a social support network" no it's just a bunch of leeches doing fuck all and living a better life than me
over here in france "asylum seekers" take advantage of the tax paying citizens
of their welfare
a way to not contribute anything to the society you live in
and instead leech off it
not providing a service a good nothing
yep, and atleast the ones who live off welfare over there dont hate the country their in
over here they desacrate landmarks
uk?
france
yep
the ones over here hate the country too, they hate it so much they leech off it
and provide nothing
its all so tiring
have you seen that one video of an immigrant on the statue of jean d'arc on the horse, humping her
and you have half your population supporting this fucking leech behavior
and the complete lack of respect of your culture or anything
yes, and they're given options when they're given the flight back to their home country
they hate the country they're in, yet take advantage of the welfare
if you dont intend to blend and mesh with the culture you want to assimilate and live with you shouldnt be granted access
thats like me moving to japan and corralling bulls in tokyo
I'm glad my husband agreed for us to move out of paris and into an isolated property kilometers out of versailles
i just want my hole in the ground on some cheap montana land
i wish i couldve been born 40 years earlier when i didnt have to worry about any of this shit
speaking of japan, they're trying to move in there too in mass amounts
japan is freaking the fuck out
they dont want more migrants
and they're suing the government or something like that for islamaphobia
its so funny watching some lefty voiceboxes start turning on le heckin japanerino
its fucking ridiculous
as your own governing country with your own culture are you not allowed to deny those who are opposite of your beliefs
its kinda just insane to me
"diversity is our strength" if only the ones they let in actively contributed and not live off welfare, while simeltaenously trying to establish sharia law
when the british conquered the americas and pushed the indigenous out was that not a conflict of belifes
but i exist in this country because of that
its fucking tiring
This is some good stuff
welfare at the price of taxpayers
the british people settled the americas, they didn't immigrate to a society already built
they made it from dirt
they pushed those who already lived there
asylum seekers should go back to their country, "but but, they'll face conviction", you do the crime you do the time
most of the asylum seekers arent even from a war torn country
eh...no, they took their land by force
trail of tears tribal scalping
there was alot
you could trade in tribal scalps for money
they pushed the locals out, yes, but they made cities and states from nothing
scalp another human being and gain profit
I get it if its from palestine or active wartorn countries, but this? they're just from the middle east
it's suicidal empathy
Any EU Einstiens telling us how to control our guns so far tonight lol
from places with no active war
they argue "but europeans were the immigrants too, they just took over, colonized africa for its resources" so you go to a country you hate to actively leech on it? it sounds like what the original europeans did but they introduced new technology to the tribes.
and their religions and cultures actively forbid anything that would warrant need seeking asylum
what did the immigrants introduce?
yes if europeans didnt come fuck all would be happening in the us
but the us has pretty much denounced european heritage
disrespect, I get desecrating statues that commemorate the shit that they went through but other statues? that didnt have anything to do with that? just plain disrespect
Yep, driving out the british was pretty based
you just did what the british would have done
it really was no different
back then nobody gave a fuck about culture
australian aborginials fucked over by the british
no fucks given
the british trying to virtue signal and seem welcoming this late in the game is crazy
I might sound like the old stella after this but after napoleons exile to st. helena, leadership was forced to kneel to monarchists again, shit has really gone down the drain, being friends,allies even, with the british?
makes me sick
the idea of colonization was from a monarchy
yep.
now theyve backtracked on it
and every other country believes them superior
nationalism
long live the queen
at this point i think killing eachother for decades might be a better alternative
humans of different beliefs structures upbringing i think are just generally incompatible
you grow up thinking one thing is right and the other is wrong and another grows up thinking the opposite
humans have been killing eachother for hundreds of thousands of years
the purpose of the french revolution was originally to detach the need for a monarchy in france, and the napoleonic wars was because the rest of europes monarchies were afraid their peasants would try the same thing, throwing a hissy fit and declaring war on france
you would just get reverse racism
and only halfway did napoleon I turn that to a conquest for europe
because his ego grew larger and larger
if it results in a better QoL for people, so be it
itd just create same tension as what happen in our world but with the opposite idea
i think people are just destined to fight and kill eachother
its mans nature
it simply is
but colonization was just catastrophic for the rest of human history
you can
i personally think having some reverened for your origins is healthy
just because you exist because of something back doesnt mean you owe it to that something
like yes you can embrace your origin
but you can still shittalk colonization
my ancestors probably murdered hundreds of natives but im alive because of them
Damn
They missed a few
🌞
my ancestors were Sicillian, they didnt do shit but fish and farm
Heheh
well we did do the trail of tears
for the remainig native population
i would say peace would be more mans "essence" than war because peacefulness usually more rational and social which people are more driven to than malice, i think want for war would be more of "accident" than it would be part of human essence
Mine I think just fucked and here I am being a mutt of both native, Mexican(maybe) and a ton of anglo Saxon muttery
i dont have any native heritage
peace is essence, war is nature, because back then, they didnt have much morals, when they learned that invading other territories and keeping it expanded their tribe, morals were thrown out the window
if i was born back in the day and was settling west i would be fucking scalping natives
a moral compass just really wasnt very devoloped back then
Damn good luck doing that with apaches
We fucked with everyone
yep, and the natives you were scalping did the same thing to you, bottom line? both sides morals were more intune to their tribe
i wouldnt say thrown away because you cant "throw away" something thats part of essence (using essence and accident in aristotelian meaning) because its part of fundamentals of what makes a human what it is, and accidents are deviations or attributes that dont compromise essence, people having malice or want for war doesnt compromise also naturally being inclined to peace but it is real thing that people do so it has to be a accident, war and malice are just failure for people to live by their nature and proper virtues (meaning performing what somethings function is)
it was just absolutely fucked
Hehe
people will do anything to get a leg up on others
and what happened to those native tribes that joined up with the colonizers?
they were fucking killed and exiled
well, back then, peace wasnt a concept to them, originally before the tribes, the cavemen were killing each other for survival
so originally, peace wasnt the nature
theyve found so many ancient skeletons with signs of murder and war
more than deaths to wildlife or anything
if cavemen were just randomly killing each other and no one cooperated none of us would be here except for a direct incest line for like half the world and that doesnt line up with anthropology or logic
well everyone is inbred
that is kind of unfortunate
but even if all them were violent in reality peace doesnt have to be absent as a concept and part of the essence
fleeting peace
so really where I'm going with this is peace is attained through war, as the original cavemen had to kill to live another day
but fact that tribes of cavemen existed at all hints at peaceful association
tribes were more extended family units
it would be like huddling together with your inlaws for warmth
but if violence and war is more part of essence than peace they would fight family and by extension have constant infighting as well
especially way back in the ice age
so them forming tribes is more of evidence from senses that peace is more part of essence than malice
is also just more rational
its more selective peace, they select who they are peaceful with
also known as discrimination
and kill anyone outside it
you protect your family against others because you discriminate not because they are of a different race or religion but because they are not your family
that is true but we dont know what cavemen exactly thought, we do know what we think today and for while before that and we know that humans in the majority incline toward peace over war
so we can assume our ancestors did the same even if its on smaller scale
but I'm talking originally, before tribes, when cavemen were still living in solitude who had to kill other cavemen to live another day
peace cant be attained if it isnt for war
there is so much killing of others for resources
how would they live in solitude if they need to mate
incest
that doesnt match with what we know of cavemen though
you think laws existed then?
what are you meaning by solitude then
incest, rape
youre saying like lone cavmen being alone, beating off doesnt make kids
if you try to go up a family tree you would have an exponential growth of people until there was more people than ever existed on earth
if you mean family units then thats same thing you were talking about earlier and its arbitrary to call it something different
until you add in incest
who they didnt kill they raped or commited incest
wdym
basically if you tried to follow a family tree
its exponential
you have 2 parents for every child and they arent related
when you say cavemen living in solitude im imagining you mean singular cavemen living in individual solitude
but im saying if you mean families or family units
Ooga booga
a group of cavemen
youre not saying anything different from before and its arbitrary to call it something different
before the tribes, you think they had a concept of reproduction?
cavemen didnt give a fuck about inbreeding
we dont know they didnt, but regardless not what im talking about
hes saying living in solitude, that would meaning like singular cavemen
so its arbitrary
most of it is anecdotal
a monk going and living in a hermit isnt a good thing to bring up when talking about people giving birth every minute
its arbitrary
you find a skelton with no other skeletons of others of its species and tribes for hundred of miles
in the form of primal lust
what does any of this got to do with humans forming tribes
well humans are the most intelligent form of life
all our evidence of cavemen is that they formed tribes and communities
they were social
yes
we are still social today
which im saying is not part of human essence its part of accidents
humans are hard wired to be soical
its part of it
we literally go insane without human interaction
and regardless of violence against other tribes, fact that humans were peaceful to each other hints at it being more part of essence than part of accidents
thats how the brain is wired
its not part of essence its part of accidents
peace and social connection is part of human essence
social connection is
its part of fundamental reality that makes humans what humans are and distinguish them from something like a chairs essence
but that social connection can be one person
we are more wired to interact with anybody atleats onje
that doesnt mean anything
like to what im saying
essence is just fundamental reality that makes something what it is, a chair has a chair essence and a human has a human essence because they have real distinction
accidents are just attributes or properties that something has that dont compromise essence
a chair is a chair because we as humans have decided it is a chair
so like hair colour is a accident because we dont not become human by having different hair colour because we share human essence
no because it has real metaphysical distinction between other things in essence
its really different from other things
which is still determined by our perception and is also manmade
no it isnt
a chair isnt manmade?
i disagree but regardless doesnt make it human made
conversations starting to get to the point where its so existensial none of us can agree
it isnt
its by basic properties
same thing as 2 + 2 = 4
rationality and metaphysics are driven by same basic methodology as arithmetic
Nah man we made that up
but a chair has real distinction
and what is rational is decided by other humans
no
yes
Nah man we made up chairs
its decided by its own laws
we didnt discover laws of rationality
they instrinsically exist as a fundamental property of itself
That’s correct
but even then
you would say 2 + 2 = 4 is wrong because we as humans can describe addition
i would say its right because its what humans have agreed upon
and rationality is driven by same principles as mathematics, and mathematics is a type of logic
humans didnt agree on any of it, humans agreed it described fundamental reality
not agreed that they just made it up
is that not what humans have agreed upon
if you say a bug is green although youre using your brain to say that, the bug is really green in reality
it isnt not green because you use your mind to say it
which still depends on how everything percieves light and color
that is lights wavelengths and how we percieve it
which are part of reality
so our perception is our reality
wavelengths dont magically differ because we say they do, they exist as a part of fundamental reality
it all exists fundamentally and is altered by how we percieve it
you can measure a wavelength from two people and it wont differ despite them using different perceptions to get that conclusion
because there are some things that are just grounded in fundamentals
and are a real part of universe
but we dont measure it as being different from the same source just because we perceieve it differently
a colour blind person wont say that something is green if he and two other people measure it to be red
itll be a property of himself not a property of reality
because he percieves it
no hes colour blind
he knows red as a concept exists
he cant agree with 2 people that something is red if he sees green if he doesnt acknowledge that red really exists
at least with a sound mind
and his acknowledgement of red is based upon what others percieve as red and in his different perception he associates whatever he sees with red
universials being able to exist already disproves that reality is just perception
because universials wouldnt exist at all
everything would be particulars
we piece together reality from the cells that make us up
and if you start saying things are all just labels and perception is reality it just collapses on itself
we do not percieve reality in its entirety
only what we have been genetically predisposed to see
you can percieve color in a band to a certain limit
we dont need to perceive anything we have non human tools to do that, but regardless countless things have shown that human senses are a reliable source for epistemology if person is of sound mind
human senses being part of epistemology doesnt mean that everything is perception
otherwise those non human tools would be invalid for epistemology
because they would be unable to perceive
you as a human are unable to percieve these things without tools
that does not disprove their existance
i dont need the tools either though
merely that the human body isnt designed to specialise
if everything is just perception it collapses on itself metaphysically
so it wouldnt make sense no matter what angle youre looking at it from
but they really exist its just that your perception is that made up by your mind
metaphysics, epistemology, rationality
I feel like there a little bit of trolling going on
either way is fun i like to talk about this
i feel like im very drunk
they do really exist
deep conversations
so you agree that reality exists
why wouldnt it
im wondering same thing
this was originally about the fact we as humans fucking murder eachother constantly
but there are people who think reality doesnt actually exist
and is all perception
but where we disagree is that perception correspond to reality
like those who think theres nothing they just percieve it
there are things its just that we percieve it all differently
I hope this put wrinkles on brainfart users brains
kind of
this is too smart for brainfart
is more that labels exist and you can just bring everything to reductions
like
a table isnt really a table is just nails and wood, and nails and wood arent really nails and wood but just metal, and metal is etc etc etc
until you get to nothing
so nothing must actually exist
metal is made up of millions of atoms
everything is stardust reformed and reshaped
but we put titles on things for understanding
but issue with that is that essences have to really exist so you cant just have nothing exist while everything exists as well
its how we understand the world
so it collapses on itself
and is self defeating
because you have to use something to say nothing exists
thats why everythings fucked
sometimes the simpler answer is the right one
Who wants a bunch of horse memes
gold ship armpits
and we do that through senses and logic

if the yakuza didn't kill everyone who made uma porn there'd be an incredible golshi futa crowd
without rationality we wouldnt understand anything and everything would kind of just be vague booking reality
but we know real things exist
so then means that real things that we can rationalize exist because rationality cant rationalize nothing
so also in a way self defeating
more you think about rationalization is just trying to prove things that exist we cant percieve exist
we cant percieve atoms but theyve always existed
so us proving they exist fuck does that do
we can perceive them with EMs
but we also know they exist before that
because we prove it
which again is evidence why rationality that doesnt contradict cant be wrong about reality because is grounded in its own principles
everything that exists its rationalized but we are still playing catch up
im gonna go piss now
enjoy it
ya everything that exists can be rationalized because rationality requires something to rationalize
how many joints did you philosofucks smoke before making it here?
None heavy drinking
but for original topic kindness is part of human essence because is a universal among humans, where war is a accident because for 1. it cant also be part of essence if kindness is because two attributes of a essence cant contradict each other or fundamentals of something would be contradictory, but also 2. because it is sensibly and rationally not part of innate human action but is more of part of people going against their essence and virtues
good man keeping it old school
too many stop supplying me
youre literally me dealer
my
oversized toddlers
that you pay a fortune to maintain
Demonic hellspawn
hey mans gotta eat
space(stable),field,food, and veterenary bills
thats true
not worth it
0 doing drugs are for losers
gamble your money instead
And not doing them is for fucking squares
What a conundrum
I don’t believe in essence, but I do think humans are naturally kind
I think humans are kind for those they are naturally dispose to
Like family or friends
then you believe in essence regardless if you accept the word as title you would believe in it as a concept
An essence implies like a soul or something
anyways im gonna take a few more shots
youre still presupposing a essence
I think people forget that kindness they biologically have is just an altrusitic gene
Or like an other-worldly thing
no in aristotelian language a essence is just what make something fundamentally what it is
and a high part that humans are social in nature
I think humans are predisposed to be kind, but I don’t think it’s a fundamental part of them
part of human essence is being made up of parts, if you werent made up of parts you wouldnt be human
so its fundamental to you
my big ah dih
we are biologically predisposed to be altrusitic, not kind
by saying people are naturally kind isnt just saying some people are kind is implying that kindness is a fundamental point of humanity
thats why when most feel scared they scream, its a primal way to tell people "hey theres something scary here, im letting you know"
we show kindness based on discrimination
kindness isnt a fundamental point of humanity
if something is intrinsic and ncessary for something is considered part of essence
it is
its not
blame me, I started it, I said that war is human nature
it is
Naturally as in it’s the path of least resistance
your confusing altrusim with kindness
it is
Like it’s best practice to be kind
we hate those who are different
right because logic and rationality are also part of human essence
xalrider moment
humans will always take most rational path if theyre following their essence and virtues
me moment
Do you think it’s possible for someone to be irrational
term for poeple like yampire is a hippie
yes but that would be what make that a accident not part of essence
there are accidents and essences
so you hate healthy people
no im not overweight unhealthy or anything
What makes it an accident and not essential to that person
essences are what fundamentally make something what it is, accidents are attributes that exist but dont contradict essence
yampire is saying things that are so individually subjective its hard to know what the fuck hes saying
what would make it essential to that person? irrationality isnt a universial for humans and humans innately have capacity for rationality so it is part of essence, two contradictory attributes cant both be fundamental so one that is more rational mean it has to be part of essence and its opposite have to be a accident unless you violate non contradiction
its so vague
its his opinion
an ideal biological human being has some sort of altruistic characteristic, doesnt mean that theyre kind
not all poeple have kindness and peace in their hearts
that is why malice is a accident not part of essence
being kind is a broader quaity which includes not limited to considerate, friendly, hospitable
an ideal biological human reproduces as much as possible is in its peak in everything it does and lives as long as humanly possible
it can if developed overtime
no
you cant change fundamental reality
a essence is fundamental reality that make something what it is
if you change something essence you change what it is
people that are hateful dont become non human because that
the fact that you have to do it with another person, and have to take care of that offspring means there is in a sense altrusim amongst humans
not kindness
No I’m asking how do you know that being irrational IS NOT essential to that person, how do you know it’s a accident
like the original cavemen, again, the original ones that killed others to survive that it became fundamentsl to them
they just have attributes that are not part of their essence
no it didnt
No wrong
most males in animals dont take care of their offspring either dying or just leaving
we have peacefulness now, so it couldnt become fundamental to them otherwise we wouldnt exist as their ancestors
we exist as humans and they were humans
ah i see the females dont count as human beings
so their fundamental reality couldnt have change
point is war can become funadmental to someone
i just explain why in that message
whole second part was explaining why
never said that for humans
we are predispoed to taking care of our young
yes thats true
Well I’m more so asking “how do you know” all that
praying mantis the female will fucking rip off the head of the mating male
because human offsprings are half baked compared to other animal offspring
Is that necessary tho
because law of non contradiction, and youre using rationality to ask how do i know that
the only do that if theres not enough food, which is almost always
How do you KNOW people can’t have disparate essential traits
they do it because sex for them is exhausting, so the female (much bigger btw) immediately looks for food
yes peace is the essence but overtime if war is the only means of survival, it can become integrated as an essence to peace
xalrider moment
your confusing conflict with war
i dont engage in war with all of you guys everyday
because it would contradict reality,
if essence is fundamental reality that make something what it is, you cant have two fundamental contradicting attributes without violating law of non contradiction which then violates rationality and makes argument irrational and not valid for epistemology or rationality (obviously)
i would engage with war
with you
in the sheets.
Yeah but sometimes I feel one thing, and other times something else
same attribute cant at same time belong to and not belong to same subject, if a essence contains two contradictory attributes it would violate law of non contradiction
call me genghis khan
that doesnt make it essential to your being
Yeah how do you know that
argh I'm done with this
Like what evidence is there for that
because you dont feel it sometimes so that means that you wouldnt exist if you didnt feel it if it was fundamental to your being
I… don’t believe you
I'm done debating with hippies
Like that doesn’t make sense internally
dont ever call me that
argh matey, gold and such
i can summarize
walk the plank
thats human nature
means you would not follow your essence and virtues
but youre asking different question
Oh so you CAN contradict essence
its wired into your brain
Nature
a woman?
Not yet Quinn, not yet
pattern seeking behavior
no because if you contradict it you just wouldnt exist and you clearly exist so means that its impossible to contradict it without contradicting your existance
yes
Then I stop existing
australopithecus evolving into a primate was a mistake
existence and non exisence are pretty fucking obvious
that is why accidents are distinct from essences
but being racist and being based arent contradictory
you dont negate your essence (i.e. stop existing) by being rude even if kindness is part of your essence because capacity for virtue, kindness, rationality, etc. remain part of your essence so is a accidental deviation and not negating your essence
what if i kill myself
im going to go jack it and go to bed
Wait so what’s the point
wake up and do it tommorow
What do u jack to
and the next day
then my conciousness is just an acciden
would go more into individual theology than something you could talk about with rationality or metaphysics
respect for women obviously
What does it matter if I can contradict my nature
ive been reading alongn to this conversation as i was waking up and i gotta say all yall are retarded kill yourselves
Thats normal for brainfart
wdym
(vince mcmahon gesturing at his neck)
I think u might be retarded if u just realized brainfart is retarded
if i walk towards the sun and it completley obliterate my human body, is then my existence metaphysically as a human body just an accident
shut up hoe
I mean shit, if I can contradict my essence, and it doesn’t seem to do anything to me, what’s the point of setting that boundary
seems like it’s just air
Estrogen hasnt come yet
go buy some
estrogen drink tap water
nothing for morality they just happen to explain parts of morality, assuming essences is more for metaphysics so that we can explain reality without it collapsing because without essences reality start to get all fucky
drink tap water flouridated reptilian fucking fed
But how do you know yampire
I live in third world. I drink filtered water from a filter not tap
because you can put it into syllogism and it follows
Shit will kill u
Seems like Aristotle just made a list of virtues and vices to map peoples personality
radiation poisoning
shit would give me explosive diarhhea
im not a aristotelian
Unironically true in some parts
my gut biome hasnt adapted to it
is just his language is common for metaphysics
fuck aristotle
onto something
Can you convince me he wasn’t just listing personality traits on a scale
no because im not a aristotelian
Alright then
i dont really care what he thought morally
im just pointing out parts of essences that can align with morality
ty
this last hour in brainfart has made me want perms back for once
