#Possible next-generation air superiority fighter for BDF
1115 messages · Page 2 of 2 (latest)
Lets throw a party ig
Wasn't Boeing's F-47 selected for F/A-XX?
Edit: Nvm I don't think anything's been selected yet
f47 is ngad
Coming back to this, assuming we go with the 2 different fighter designs i mentioned before. I think it should be whichever side gets the more J-36 style fighter would get the XQ-58 style CCAs and whoever gets the more J-50/F-47 style fighter has the more vectis/UADF style CCAs
Effectively, one has the CCAs escort the fighter while the other has the fighter escorting the CCAs
Those intakes are very interesting
Honestly, tandem-seating J-36 doesn’t look that bad, although it’s kind of weird now that I’ve seen so much of the actual side-by-side cockpit
j36 seems to place emphasis on coordination and carriage so side by side kinda makes sense to me, it isnt your daily conops
A good resource for Ideas is from the NASA report about conceptual aircraft, specifically "Investigation Into the Impact of Agility in Conceptual Fighter Design"
Its a short document detailing NGAD related aircraft designs and the process behind them including illustrations and graphic documentation. An example aircraft included is what people believe to be the new Boeing F-47, or at least an early iteration of it (See Multirole Concept 988-119 @ page 174)
Good find. There’s quite a bit of interesting stuff in there.
Four straight pages of comparing the pros and cons of every control surface and high-lift device design under the sun
Yeah that pdf is a goldmine, hope it informs the next high rank fighter.
thanks, it really does have some interesting things I didn't even think of or knew the extent of.
“Ballistic weapons ‘guns’
Benefit: none”
on page 40 made me chuckle.
hey at least it has a low chance of failure, also tf is "Hypervelocity Weapons"
This could be for a smaller darkreach variant
I loved "canards" in strengths on page 216
canard supremacy believers at nasa? (I suppose they have put canards on every damn aircraft in the past)
Extremely fast penetrators, it looks like. “Hypersonic” wasn’t the buzzword it is today back when this was published.
I see potential in this, refine it a bit.
We finally reaching Ace Combat-esk aircraft
Incredibly weird three-surface? I kind of like it.
Looks almost like a stealth/ modern version of the early STOL/MTD aircraft
There's also this thing.
I love this so much
and don't forget the F-47?, idk it kinda looks like it
That’s unequivocally a really cool configuration.
For the three surface, you could inspire it more on the X36, i belive thats how a production model of it would look like
Theres even a section on their role for good-ness sake, this thing is loaded with info
I wouldnt be suprised if the X36 was originated from one of the contenders
Those initial air-ground aircraft looking chunky
i mean they are suppoused to carry a bunch of bombs, so using the b2's configuration and data would be time saving.
They definitely don’t have much interest in maneuverability with the projected 0.3 final thrust/weight.
That initial design for low observable air-to-air/multirole honestly looks perfect for this (maybe add some LeRXs though)
they are suppoused to be invisible to radar, so as long as they do it right, there's no problem in flying a brick
The Air-ground concepts have some funky engines, mounted up top like the B-2 with seemingly only yaw thrust vectoring. 45 DEGREE DEFLECTION?! Wtf
the name hopless diamond came into my mind
I want what these designers were smoking
straight DOD contract money is what they were smoking
Their nosetips do the lerxing, you can see it on the yf23 and such aswell.
the X 36 looks like the initial concept of the mutlirole with high maneuverability,
I think the final config version of that might be an ancestor of the F-47, just look at those front ends
god its so good, X36 is criminally underrated by everyone but nasa, who said it “outperformed practically every metric they set for it”
ive never underrated anything about the x36, i wanna see a full size model so bad
you'll notice that these aircraft have no vertical stabilizers
yeah, no wonder, almost as if not having a vertical stabilizer gives it better stealth properties.
yaw vectoring is the only way to make yaw inputs without any control surface deflection, its one of the things that the X-36 tested
i would have never guessed, given the way the nozzle of the X36 is hidden.
pretty sure the X-36 is based on the 988-119 anyways, NASA also made it, a couple years after that paper
This idea is cool but boscali is a bunch of broke boys it doesn’t sound like they couldn afford any of this
Its the 2070s and we are talking about late 90s concepts.
I would not exclude these aircraft from the realm of possibilities, even for some small island nations.
Im sure this would be their equivalent of the raptor in thier world, old but still reliable.
Another good equivalent could be the HAL AMCA or TAI Kaan: a fairly modern aircraft with all the characteristics of its generation, but one that entered service much later than the earliest members of that generation, and at a time when the larger powers of the world were already deploying aircraft significantly ahead of it
isnt… boscali generally considered the longer standing and more “established” of the two..?
i mean hell they have the DR and Medusa, the two most expensive aircraft currently
Heck, it could be to the sixth generation what the current KF-21 is to the fifth; designed with similar geometry and many of the same considerations, but not quite there.
that is sure quite the excel page. full of good info tough
to the best of my knowledge, neither of those aircraft are actually confirmed to be of either faction yet
this part drives me nuts ngl, like sure there's probably a very logical, very reasonable, very sensible explanation for why it looks like that but I HATE IT SO MUCH
Stelf
Holy shit I got ratioed and I didn't even know it 😭
So many of the designs in that paper do just look... really odd, something about the huge wing area with relatively low sweep angle just doesn't look right on a fighter
Still though, there's a lot of inspiration to be taken for tailless designs (especially those with canards)
I guess it's the same way as concept art works, over development things get refined and improve their design.
32 downvotes 😭
give bro a break
I have a point though
wait, lmao, anyway
cant downvote me if i do it first
holy crap, I might have found a way to bait people
I mean it was a bad opinion
Cockpit or casket?
caskpit
Cockpit all the way
So you can say you have an ass so perfect you can craptalk that one?
nobody can insult that gyatt
Top 3 messages on the suggestion forum
(I forgot to post this)
If the game has a true 6th gen fighter above the Ifrit, it should be called the Monarch
Khan (I had to do it)
Which one is the second prototype
The one with red highlights
No, the top one is, the one with the red boxes is the original
Switched to DSI instead of Caret, probably to simplify though that reduces it's top speed to around Mach 2, got rid of the bogey gears for simplification and weight reduction, now the moved nozzles are interesting, they moved them forward which probably means the engines are also slightly pushed forward
I think the engines themselves are in around the same place, it's just that they have F-22 style TVC nozzles instead of the YF-23 style buried engines of prototype 1, so you can better see how far forward they already were
True, so they probably just want high altitude trim control on the aircraft to reduce reliance on control surfaces
Personally I worry about the edge alignments for the new engine section increasing RCS, but if that's what's needed to make it controllable then it's probably an acceptable loss
Maybe if the control surfaces were too much of a pain to adjust and program, so they went with tvc to increase its reliability
Shouldn't mess with frontal angles too much, rear and side are taking a bit of a hit though
It's the B-2 trailing edge changes all over again 💔
B-2's TE matches with the LE wha
It's like one of the best angle minimized designs ever made
I think it's a case that it might be too long to develop the FBW of this configuration, so they want to get this thing into mass production quickly.
I can see unwanted trim drag and stealth concerns being the issue, though it does use those fancy control surfaces so reliability might also come into play
I was thinking of how it originally had a single diamond shape like the B-21 but it got changed late in the design to the shape it has now to improve low altitude penetration capability, which caused rear-aspect RCS to suffer more than it would have originally (I might be misremembering though)
The angles would still match the same but theres more surfaces that reflect back, it would tank RCS but only at those specific angles that they sacrifice
Diamond wings just kinda suck tho so
I'm interested in how chinese aircraft seem to aim to stealth mixing the principles of the f 117 and B2 for some reason. They tend to be super angular while retaining some modern semblance of stealth.
F-117 principles kinda suck for aero so we tend to avoid that as much as possible by remembering top and bottom aspects don't matter
With the new ones it's mostly about focusing on all-aspect stealth, using more modern FBW systems to try and get as close to the theoretical Hopeless Diamond as possible, and be stealthy from all angles (which the B-2 and B-21 are the best example of all-aspect stealth designs so far)
Huh, turns out I wasn't misremembering
Much harder when the thing you want to make all aspect stealth is a fighter that actually wants to fly
Either way, I do like the idea of each side of the game having their own stealth machine the way the ifrit and vortex do, but inverted.
The aero's guy dream is the nightmare of the stealth guy's and viceversa
Trying to get all aspect stealth(excluding top and bottom) is very hard when you also need kinematics, thrust, aoa, and fuel of a fighter to fulfill
There's like two usable planforms to use and they all have to be single surface or have a fixed plane in the case of F-47
It's all really jank when I think about it because normal 5th gens aren't that compromising at all other than high cost
one shall not shite on a trait if he has not the better