As of right now we have one type of attack helicopter and its pretty heavy price in early game at $35 million. don't get me wrong, it should be at that price. I think it would be nice to have a light attack helicopter at around $17 million. It would consist of Flex mount 12.7 mini guns, for the Stub pylons AGM- 48 x 4 or Lynchpin x7 , and for the Stub Tip Pylons IRM-S1 x 2 or AGM-48 x2 just to give an idea.
#Little Bird Type Helicopter
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I don't really see what niche a smaller heli could fulfill atm. Sure, you could afford it easier, but teh Chicane is already cheap as id
I do agree it would be kind of a niche Heli but I know personally I would rather run an light attack Heli than a Compass or a Cricket. I could see the Light attack Heli running in the front lines performing QRF Operations with out needing to go back to a base to rearm. If this Heli was added I could see the Chicane being more around $45 - $50 million
Would be fun to have something extremely nimble
It'd be slower than the chicane,meaning not a single person would use it. Everyone complains about chicane's speed already
@wintry wing it would be pretty much be on par with speed (pretty well all combat helicopters top speeds are around 300km/h) . The little bird would be able to get up to top speed and be able to change course quickly because of its lightweight nature.
The game lacks a search and rescue heli and it would be pretty much perfect for that role
obligatory kiowa mention
good point
would make a bit more sense if infantry were a thing
Call it Opal
Opal yes
people see a bird one time and get obsessed 😭 just put a kiowa knockoff in the game 
I know I want a kowa more too
it should totally be called pothole or bump to fit with the whole "road" element of the name with the chicane
LSH-28 Ditch
Gore
this would be good if the economy wasnt as good as it is
People keep saying this type of helicopter would just be overshadowed by the Chicane and while yes it would, it is also what the Cricket is to the Compass
A (even cheaper) rank zero, nimble, light attack craft for early game spotting and engagements
yeah, a sort of cricket side-grade would be AWESOME
Give it optional mast mounted sensors if people want to do spotter stuff, it would be like an extremely cheap (and more limited) AWACS in some respects
Actually, setting up the 'hardpoints' so the mast sensor selection is in a 'support equipment' slot, which obviously would house the additional electronics for the sensors, and could be swapped for a SAR module or expanded weapons bay, or left empty for weight saving, etc.
Much like how the Tarantula has a modular interior that can fit weapon systems at the cost of cargo space
RE: Expanded weapons bay
Because I just remembered how conceptually cool this scene was
https://youtu.be/gkKjL2Tr6uI?si=QrCzgPyxoBuOcPGU
Watch the official IRON MAN 3 Clip - "Mansion Attack" (2013). Let us know what you think in the comments below!
IRON MAN 3 is the movie by Shane Black.
PLOT: When Tony Stark's world is torn apart by a formidable terrorist called the Mandarin, he starts an odyssey of rebuilding and retribution.
RELEASE DATE: 3 May 2013 (USA)
GENRE: Action, Adv...
That can also be spawned by small ships, not Shard-level small (it cannot store anything larger than a drone) but something in-between 600 t corvette and 10k t DDG, like 1.5-2k t frigates.
It would have to have some hefty pylons if you wanna make using this helicopters load out worth it
Kiowa
in 1990 dollars the Kiowa Warrior cost 6.7 million, which sounds just about right as a Cricket sidegrade
(I'm going to ignore that the inflation-adjusted price is 16.58 million dollars :V)
i think it's worth it just to have a rank 0 helo tbh
it's not like rotorcraft controls the same way as fixed wing
Yee
If rescuing downed pilots is going to be a feature then this will be a good way to do it.
I could go for this if it was something more modern and speedy than a Little Bird-type helo, maybe more like Sikorsky's Raider. A coax rotor helo with a pusher prop for speed would be really good, and it works best for small to mid-size helos (as in it doesn't scale so well to larger designs).
Kind of like this.
Here's a size comparison, my suggestion would be closest to the Raider (center left):
I indirectly suggested it as a maritime operator but people said no because expensive
I hope we get an osprey equivalent at some point
tarantula is quite big and will likely be expensive
(not to mention that osprey looks better)
We need a multipurpose medium-lift helo tbh, something sorta like a Defiant or UH-60 that can be configured to do a variety of things. Light transport (maybe slingload one of those new light vehicles). CSAR, and light CAS. But that's not really the point of this post, this is more about a somewhat similar but much smaller helo with more limited capabilities.
kind of a different thing imo. I think something like this would be cool, but I see it as a separate role. This is very much more of a high-end transport helo, rather than a light recon helo.
Defiant yes, Raider no. Raider is more like a modern version of Little Bird in terms of size.
wouldn't the sikorsky x2 or s-97 be closer to the little bird in size?
These tiltrotor/push prop helis all seem like they'd be quite expensive for a rank 0 heli
The thing is more than 4 times the weight of a little bird with a capacity of 6 people in addition to the aircrew. It might be a scout helo, but it’s a much more complex aircraft than a little bird. I do think that the S-97 is a much more viable option for nuclear option, though
A little bird like helicopter would be useful in light infantry support and for rapid aircrew recovery, high importance light cargo/VIP transport and scouting
Kiowa.
Little bird is as little useful amounts of helo as you can get without going quad copter or drone lol, kiowa is better, or Lakota
I think because NO is at the scale that infantry dont exist, the littlebird becomes useless because such little amounts of weapons and such a lack of utility outside of bullying squishy groups of humans makes it nothing but a glorified SPAAG target
Kiowa.
Nick we get it
Exactly right
Kiowawa
Kiowa.
KIOWA GAMING
20 km surveillance range!!!
Kiowa….
Kiowa.
Kiowhat
Kiowa could work tbh
Either you carry 2x rocket pod
or 4x -48
get out, scout, come back
For the scope of NO, probably give it a little more since everything is so potent
As in, a couple extra hardpoints so you always have the option to also bring S1s
A Lakota is better for a light helo imo, it a blackhawk, just please not something so miniscule as a littlebird
Itd be a whole hundred km/h or so slower than the Chicane, which is already known as the resident overfed chonker
you say that but the chicane is blisteringly fast for how big of a conventional copper it is
Lakiowa.
otherwise... what about a Huey? It is, afterall, the platonic ideal of a utility helicopter being armed pressed into being a gunship because there's no other option
and it's only the most produced helicopter ever <.<
Would be nice, but doesn't fit this specific post haha. Could make a new one for it or bump one that already exists
Kiowa.
Kiowhen?
i WNAT small helicopter NOWWW!!!!!!
Kiowa.
Yep, and the Ifrit in many ways eclipses both the revoker and compass.
Having a small, light helicopter at Rank 0 perhaps wouldn’t he a bad idea… but perhaps instead of something like the Little Bird, maybe it should be something more like the Super Cobra.
It would be faster and more nimble than the Chicane, but with a slightly smaller payload and a 20mm rotary cannon turret.
Kiowa.
I just want a bird with skids instead of wheels, landing gear diversity!
Kiowa.
kiowa
Kiowa.
Kiowa
no do coaxial rotors instead
Koaxowa?
Coaxial kiowa...
Intermeshing-rotor Kiowa...
Contra-rotating Kiowa...
And yep. Dont show devs how could looks same helicopter with two rotary weapon. Like... In Carrier command 2
Kiowa.
Go read the suggestion rules
kiowa.
Kiowaaaaagh
Kiowa.
the next helicopter should be a single turbine single rotor skidded light observation helicopter converted from a civil transport model with a rotor mast-mounted optical sensor suite 
And with place for atleast 1 downed pilot, not like late modifications of Kiowa
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowagain.
Needs to be a NOTAR
Kiowa.
Kiowa
Kiowa.
Get 2 tha choopa
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kioalm down!
Okay okay. Kiowa type.
But in future kiowa must be awful.
What's about future variant?!!
What about CAS convoy killer?
Nah, exist chicane with biggest 30mm turret and 2 25mm flex gunpods... Even if he will have 2 counterrotors...
Maybe we will have one really new experience variant like naval miner(and unminer), which can deploy and destroy naval or... Ground mines?
Nah... Could be not so good...
So... Any useful ideas?
Scout helicopter, swifter than Chicane but carries way less armaments.
It is the only thing I can think of for a potentially cheaper helo.
But honestly, you can perfectly just use a Cricket for the same purpose in that specific case.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
Give it 12.7 flex gunpods/turrets?
Kiowa.
Kiowa with 12.7 flex gunpods/turrets
Give the kiwoa a 105 millimeter cannon ezpz
If you want one that is truly a jack of all for a chopper, it has to be the black hawk... it is decent speed and in DAP mode can be VERY scarry... like 20mm cannon, 2 gattlings, 8 hellfire, and 20+rockets (due to more then 7 per pod, with NO weapons only 14)
That said I want a very fast scout with limited weapons with a recon point system. I have it as a suggestion already, but more eyes on fast boy choppers the better.
i like smth between sikokskiy and noname first place style. They have cool style.
Whay about real future speed for helicotpter?
What if install for them engines which will increase him horizontral speed?
There is a max speed for non- tilt rotor style choppers... eventually you have to become a plane, or you are stuck below 250mph
There was a movie where a chopper could lock a twin blade on top into a wing like position and turned on either jets or a rocket motor to go fast. Already thought that looked cool 😎, but would be way too complicated and likely to fail irl.
Well well well... I think after 50 years we will have chances for at least prototype version of same type of helicopters...
Maybe their construction will be smth middle between helicopter and plane, buuuut... Must work.
And smth tell me same type of helicopter cannot be small...
eventually retreating blade stall becomes too much of an issue
Kiowa.
What about having a target designator thing on it?
And make it so cruise missiles like the ALM-C450 and ALND-4 either require direct LoS from whoever shoots it, or somebody else "painting" target for them to work when indirect fired (?)
That would add a new little role to the game as a scout/spotter, and limit the ALM-C450/ALND-4 spam a little bit. Or, if that balance would be unappealing, maybe have some artillery land vehicles or static emplacements that could fire whenever something gets designated if they are in range.
The craft would be more of a support that way, similar to how the Medusa is more of a helper and/or AWACS once SEAD is handled.
We could also have the Cricket be able to have that same designator option (perhaps as an alternative thing mounted where the guns would be), so we have those target designator pods on the "cheap plane" and "cheap heli", giving them some extra mid-late game use specific to them.
The heli could have its designator above the rotor, like a periscope, so it can just poke out from behind cover while scouting/designating. (Yes, kinda like the Kiowa).
K
i
o
w
a
.
I think GPS targeting should remain, but as is if you target a moving target and no one has sight on it...you will likely miss, there is some optical guidance at the very end but it wont "hunt" if it cannot see it. I think "lasing" a target should give a buff to the damage, to simulate aiming for weak spots. Also increase the accuracy of bombs and even the 76mm.
Imagine a scout marking a convoy at long range and a 76mm fires say 3 rounds a target at extreme range and the shell all have good guidance at terminal phase.
Marks targets for ballistic missiles so they can also be in the game😁
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
Ballistic doesnt need marking, its just unguided dumb rocket, just target a 16 digit grid. I think you mean just long range heavy missiles, be they AGM or surface launched.
We are talking about a game set in the future tho, it can work lol after all what if the target is moving.
Could even use like MLRS unit to do this tho that fires a beefed up lynchpin.
Yes I was saying the terms were wrong, BALLISTIC means unguided. Basically big explosive bullet. It is possible to do what you are talking about with current tech. We dont do long range "lynchpin" due to the fuel cost to get it to go the distance isnt worth the small payload, so we up scale it to 100+mm. The smaller caliber unguided rocket volleys only have a range of MAYBE 15km. Heavier guided ones can go 100+km. I think the US Army has some with up to 500km range? Have to look them up again.
So the PrSM has a 499+km range and the ATACMS has 300km
The first part of this is completely wrong. Ballistic missiles are most definitely guided. Guidance of such weapons is usually based on some type of inertial navigation system for a variety of reasons, but it's there none the less. It's not always super accurate, but given that ballistic missiles are generally armed with either a large conventional warhead or one or more nuclear warheads, it doesn't necessarily have to be. Particularly in the case of the nuclear-armed ones, you don't need the same CEP as a laser-guided bomb to get the job done, landing within a few hundred yards or so of the target will usually do.
See here.
Anyway we're way off topic. I would like to see a smaller, faster helo than the Chicane, but not quite as tiny as a Little Bird. That's too small to be very effective in a game like this, you'd basically have 14 Lynchpins and maybe a couple of S1s, or you might could swap out the Lynchpins for 4x AGM-48s. Either way that's precious little ordinance to be carrying around when you are one of the slowest platforms in inventory.
Kio
Kiowa
or..
ARH-70 Arapaho
What the hell is that last one lmao
Also the fastest helicopter is the 400km/h clean Lynx
generally if a futuristic looking aircraft is labeled with "?????????" as the name it's usually clickbait
A speed the Chicane meets, but neither have a pusher prop. There is a suggestion for a higher speed helicopter with a pusherprop and increased payload though https://discord.com/channels/909034158205059082/1296708606183477269
also it says "11 fastest" and only shows 4 so the one you mentioned is probably there
It would be number 4, which is skipped on the list (it goes 5, 3, 2, 1), the 3rd and 2nd have pusher props. 3rd on the sides and 2nd on the back
The last one isn't even a helicopter on the actual list, its the Osprey (mechanically a prop plane with vtol capabilities)
figures
Modern kiowa esque thing
Google it
The Bell ARH-70 Arapaho was an American four-bladed, single-engine, light military helicopter designed for the United States Army's Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) program. With a crew of two and optimized for urban combat, the ARH-70 was slated to replace the Army's aging OH-58D Kiowa Warrior.
Excessive delays and growth in program costs ...
Forgive me for asking a dumb question but what I've always wondered makes the Kiowa so 'big' compared to other light helos like AH-6 and Bo-105?
More specifically, what takes up all that space in the back, and do other helicopters:
a. Lack that equipment or
b. Just have more compact/less equipment?
I ask because in the context of NO, maybe we could elect to bring more support equipment for better optical spotting or concealment or whatever
Pretty sure there's a fuel tank back there, and maybe some other stuff.
Anyway for all the crazies in here shouting for a Kiowa, how about this thing instead? Or something like it anyway.
Woow. That almost looks how chopper which do my friend. With tail rotors to pull it forward and with gimbal guns. Maybe not so easy, but it work not bad!
Those aren't tail rotors, they're propfans. And this is literally just a Kiowa with a short tail boom, propfans, and contra-rotating rotors. Pretty sure that gun is also fixed, not flexible. In NO I imagine something like this could carry the 25mm flex guns, though I don't know why you'd want to. AGM-48s or Lynchpins would be a much more effective loadout.
Until an aircraft or CIWS shows up
Well that's also true of the Chicane lol. Even a light helo like this would need at least a pair of S1s to give marauding fixed wing aircraft something to think about. Maybe it could have a center pylon for a single 25mm flex gun pod, or carry a flex gun on one side and missiles on the other.
Ohhh I see, the fueltank never got reconfigured from the original under-the-seat spot
Likely would of had more efficient space use if it was, but obviously not worth the cost
Well it complicates things to move it, because that means more CG shift. You want that sort of thing to be as close to the center of lift (the rotor hub in this case) as possible, so as it is emptied it has minimal effect on the CG location.
Yes exactly propfans. I very like same conception!
I think same helicopter will can reach bigger speed than classical scheme of helicopter. For small weak aircraft big speed - longer live! Maybe he can used for fast front reconnaissance? Maybe same helicopter will have much better maneuverability. And maybe same helicopter will have smaller cost(maybe near cricket and compass) and even have 0-1 rank... Of course he maybe will have small RCS to evade by going low to the ground, like chicane.
If it will have speed near 500km/h it could be very good alternative for cricket!
Yes Mitch please give me more options to hit with bombs 💣 🚁
Well a helo that's capable of 260 knots might be hard to hit with bombs (aside from nukes of course). But it would certainly make the Cricket obsolete to have a helo that can go that fast, unless it has a significant payload penalty for it. Cricket can run 28x Lynchpins and 2x S3s, so maybe this would be okay if the small helo is rank 1 and maxes out at 14x lynchpins and 2-4x S1s. Maybe give it a door gun or something, useless as that would be 😂
what if - no turret by default, but you can equip 25mm gunpods
Well you'd lose your lynchpins, but that seems like a fair trade. IDK who would take them over lynchpins tbh, but having the option would be nice
you could have a dedicated gun slot and one or two missile slots, pretty realistic for a light attack helicopter
i'd say a 20 or 12.5 (maybe both as options) gun, and two 1-slot pylons per side (each could have 1x agm-48, 1 lynchpin pod, 1 S1)
maybe only allow 2x lynchpin pods, but tbh i don't think it matching the cricket's lynchpins would be a huge hit when the cricket has plenty of flexibility
less variety than the cricket so as not to stop on its toes, less sheer capacity and strength than the chicane
what if it could get the gtg missiles from IFVs as a weapon? Might be an interesting and unique weapon for the heli, altho as is they are barely better than lynchpins
maybe to make up for the lack of S3 capability there could be a capacity for a larger top attack missile that ensures a one hit kill for tanks
basically smaller agm 68 ig
Kiowa.
Crazy?
doesn't look like a helicopter enough imo even though its theoreticaly feasible
Yes crazy, you guys know the rules by now. Asking for a particular RL aircraft is a violation of https://discord.com/channels/909034158205059082/1207177464237920297
IDK how you have gotten on this long before mods started shutting this nonsense down. Of course there's never going to be a Kiowa in NO, unless someone mods it in maybe. Same for the F-14, F-22, A-10, and so on
Buddy
Its a joke
You think I havent read those
I want an aircraft similar to it silly
It's getting old TBH
Meh
Kiowa.
Kiowa.
KIA-Boom more like
Kia 

Kiowa
Kiowa.
Ok scrooge
Zulu viper is my fav heli so yes pls
What do you think about same recoon helicopter style aircraft?
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/939446042746655053/1EB4C92D6133B47FC12FF2473292C286C5B1B7CD/?imw=1920&&ima=fit&impolicy=Letterbox&imcolor=%23000000&letterbox=false
This looks like actual combat footage
Lol it's because I've been able to figure out how to take my video to gif form but since it gets turned down a lot by resolution it blurs it almost perfectly
Kiowa.
<@&1118065368657821747> I think we might need a cleanup here @inner wharf is just flooding the suggestion up with stuff that's against the rules
for the record i didnt do this