#Disk size different in AFF and ASA system

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

fiery coyote
#

Has anyone found this difference?

fiery coyote
#

Another question,can I add a disk to a pod manually in ASA R2 ?

unborn peak
#

since ASA R2 uses the disks in a completely different manner (Storage Pods), a small difference is certainly not unexpected. I haven't checked it yet but I guess they finally got rid of the old "partitions" reserved for the kernel, drivers etc.
If you want you can try a node run ... label examinev1 0n.0 in diag mode and look at the "filesystem" start and end blocks, and compare those

unborn peak
stark gale
#

Dont know if it's related to your case but there has been a bug where an incorrect size has been reported.

#

Will check if I can find the bug

fiery coyote
stark gale
#

the bug report shows different disk models but unsure what drives are really impacted by that bug

stark gale
# fiery coyote Another question,can I add a disk to a pod manually in ASA R2 ?

Afaik you can't manually do that. Also it's not recommended to add a single disk. The docs say "The minimum number of drives you should add in a single procedure is six." (https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/asa-r2/administer/increase-storage-capacity.html#use-netapp-hardware-universe-to-prepare-for-installation-of-a-new-drive)

Check this KB regarding RAID requirements with ASAr2: https://kb.netapp.com/on-prem/ASAr2/ASAr2_KBs/What_are_the_RAID_requirements_for_ASA_r2

fiery coyote
stark gale
fiery coyote
stark gale
#

ok then I don't think it's that bug. I guess ASAr2 with their SAZ vs. Unified ONTAP with aggrs works differently here.
What ONTAP version and hardware models are these? We have hundreds of systems with our customers - I could check what disk sizes are reported if you like.

unborn peak
unborn peak
unborn peak