#The female character are not just oversexualised, they are straight up poorly designed
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
somehow whatever u said has made more sense than anyone that supports this thread lol
This is why also after all this time and activity it still has 18 stars only. There can be very good takes or truth aswell but reality is most ppl dont care about these things, and especially when game is doing as bad as it is... imagine devs focus actively on these kinds of things what would most players that dont give a shit think. Yeah... so while maybe in ways devs should listen it isnt and shouldnt be a priority. And if they want it to be then they need to be reasonable and find common ground which often times is not realised or is even ridiculed at. Like me saying some shit about the boobas being saggy but instead of asking why getting a random last airbender joke/insult. Like just ask if i think thats actually a bad thing or if im just joking around or something instead atleast idk. People care too much for how little others care thats it
ik everyone who uses female characters in this game are gooners
lol yea. i also think the main erason for the 100 poop emojis is because the original post was just so bad it wasnt even saying girls are wearing revealing clothes its talking about shapes lmao.
saros tag u are nasty
Today I learn where all the discussion is going
yeah its all in here
tbf this was the most tame thread this week
ahahaha
looks like nyx was such a success that no one is upset about female champ design anymore
You are real obsessed with this thread arent you?
Yeah if you just bump the thread for no reason one more time ill time you out
thats like the third time within a few days
These kinda ppl eventually get tired of their own current bullshit and move onto to another kind of bullshit instead to keep it interesting :d
Even though she is ugly as sin i think she satisfys people's want for a different kind of character
Honestly ur more obsessed with this than we are
U and Vuli should just take over
It's an old discussion, but it's interesting to see Vuli react in a very not normal way. 
Also, I'll stop being "puritan" when objectification stops being shoved down our throats.
holy fuck this discussion is huge, kinda doubt TC hasn't seen this by now
So you agree? You agree your irrational hatred of anything sexual is puritan?
If you like cake, do you want to eat nothing but cake for every meal of the day?
No but id like some more from the bakery like pies or pastries!
You dont hate cakes you hate sugar
Maybe if you actually used your eyes, you would know that the only people that make you think that are the ones making cakes.
They're the ones trying to convince you that if people cut back on cakes, then sugar will be banned.
we arent obsessed whatsoever
i legit just click supervive discord and click some channels and write some shit on the spot
Why do you think Nerryl is here?
I believe you for sure
np if u want to be low iq racist u can be low iq racist
Bro called me racist

I didnt read the text. Just too much.
But I agree. Most female chars are same. Skinny and big "parts"
I think thats super cringe
Me???
I've only been timed out once ever what lmao
yes i just deleted ur messages for the past few times, you know well enough atp. just sotp doing it.
Can we at least make sure this thread is archived and not deleted when enough time has finally passed
I just use this as the general thread tbh
this thread needs to be used in studies
these guys lost the plot now theyre talking about desserts lol
ill tune back in a week and these guys gonna start yapping about tricycles or something
Can u dm me which ones cause I genuinely don't remember and I need to use this as a learning experience to reflect on my past behavior and improve
HAHA
u could enter discussion with someone on call
and after 3 minutes of talking they wont even remember what u started saying so they are confused
I mean, you don't send a Ph. D student to talk to the elementary school about career choices. You send the fireman. I think most people just realized there wasn't an intellectual debate to be had.
Of course there isn't, it's a bunch of men talking about women.
There wasn't debate to be had because the only people who's opinions matter are legit women's.
the funniest thing in that regard was when i said that a shirt is worn commonly and was told that that means they choose to sexualize themselves, by a dude. Thats kinda why i stopped interacting with this
I think theres too many dumbasses with extreme opinions on a matter that really isnt that big
Depends if you’re coming at it from a societal perspective or a game developer perspective I’d say
Game studio may suffer from ignoring a large part of their playerbase
Most people who complain about shit like this are a vocal minority.
And they're usually terminally online
I understand what you're saying tho
This is post is mainly from the societal point which unless you're a women, you really have no say in what is okay or not okay for a female character.
True. Though I think it goes both ways
The amount of men and women in the playerbase who truly care about this issue is fairly small
Unless you are an anthropomorphic fox you really have no say in what is okay or not okay for an anthropomorphic fox character.
Very reductive reasoning and quite easily exposed too- Try a more persuasive argument.
this thread is still going???
Yeh man whys a man got an opinion on women's clothing. I think we shouldn't be able to criticize unless we are the same as the thing we criticize because that makes sense!
Why are you plebs criticizing nyx? Are any of you sentient Ais trapped in a dead human body??
Im actually on week 2 of injections in my arm so I can finally participate in kp discourse abt his design
I think theres enough examples of men not getting why fashion for women is the way it is. Doesnt mean you should invalidate everyone, but most definetly means that its common that men engaging in these things often just dont understand what women like to wear.
Or just generally dont understand alot of the things that are normal for women.
And i know most of you dudes that have such extreme thoughts on both sides cant seem to get it but ill say it again: Women dont exlusively dress for you.
i am an anthropomorphic fox I think I can have a say on matters around here
There are also enough examples of people misinterpreting, projecting, what-abouting, or otherwise immediately veering off the conversation in an effort to stand on a perceived moral or ethical high ground.
Again- this conversation is not about what women like to or dislike to wear. There are quite a few women out there with extremely different fashion tastes and what they wear is entirely up to them.
For the record, these are characters in a video game and are entirely fictional. They are not making any choices themselves as characters when it comes to designs, but rather the artists are in full control.
Attempting to lump the person you are arguing against into a class or group and then disparage that class for a perceived fault or shortcoming of the group is also a pretty poor discussion technique, for the record.
Lotta things need to be said for the record around here I guess..
So you agree that men often have bad interpretations of these things
Often enough to see that as a general problem
Because no other point was made, outside of me thinking choosing to wear a shirt is choosing to sexualize urself, idk what ure even trying to argue.
Yeah, there are quite a few examples of people who have presented their identify as male above have a pisspoor interpretation of feminist issues and discussions. You are in fact one of the main people who this describes.
Should you take every bad take arround these things or try to apply build up reasoning behind every clothingpiece of a fictional character?
Obviously no
Cool that u think that bro 💀
Esp at the current age, most of the time people with extreme believs are the main reason why these issues get ignored.
ure a prime example of that just like most of the people in here that caused the discussion to be ridiculed so heavily
📽️
You dont try to be reasonable urself, or argue, you just put up a strawman of me applying something to characters when i never did
You seen one of these cool pieces of tech before?
Classic luke behaviour: dont argue the points or give any examples, just say shit for the sake of saying shit lol
And then feel smart

Was what I said above not an argument?
Terminally online behavior, like I said
I didnt disagree with it, it was simply not argueing the point i made.
I don't really need to argue my point because your text, your actions both taken and not taken, and the ease with which you switch to ad hominem attacks illustrates the truth of my argument.
So i corrected it and explained why it didnt, but instead of just aknowledging that you went straight up "OH YOU HARM FEMINISM", again without anything xxD
you did this lol
like
youre so delusional man
And its like this every time u start interacting with me too xD
In what way is that a personal attack? I was pointing out that you are demonstrating the characteristics you seem so quick to highlight in others.
So you dont argue my points made, you just straight up attack me personally without any reasoning whatsoever, its good
I do the same thing but actually point out the reasons why i think that way and give examples upon ur own behaviour: AD HOMINEM!!
There is a reason it is the trolls and you left typing in this thread and none of the people who actually wanted to discuss this with each other..
The issue that u agreed with i highlighted? xD
And thats what u then point out towards me, even tho i criticize it and cant remember ever engaging in that kind of behaviour?
1:shes got no armor for a knight
2: she has almost nothing telling anyone that shes at all cybernetic
surely thats the reason, not that the game is just dead rn and people stopped engaging with things broadly and mainly me deleting messages trying to bump the thread for the past few weeks.
Tbh, just archive it and move on. It was a pointless discussion to be had regardless
This is some 2013 type shit
When we've moved passed and grown as a society when it comes to this
People will just make new threads and if we keep closing them theyll keep making them. I think the only real way of solving this issue is being able to time out people from making them or giving them a cooldown which i dont think im able to do non permanently. I think keeping this one open and trying to moderate it from people just bumping it without trying to have a new discussion happen (like a new character release or argueing other designs)
Theres a ton of similar threads atp
I doubt there will be anyone left at this rate to continue making them
Unfortunately your not an Ai trapped in a corpse or a death knight so you cannot actually critique anything about nyx according to my idolo nerryl
you could make that point about every thread, just look at the "i couldve saved the game" ahh threads
True
fair enough lamo.
Btw again, never said this
You made this point urself lol
but still like she could use some more armor
Please direct your criticism to the character with which your sex and species closely matches
Her boots are DOGSHIT
definetly, i think most people agreed on that
this is the kinda behaviour that actually caused for this thread to spiral btw. Youre not here to make a point, youre here because u cant control urself enough to just accept the points that were made instead of just switching to shit that noone said.
That is the logical conclusion of your point imo
The only point im here to make is that yours was stupid as fuck
Ah ok what was my point again?
Ohh you have dementia my b my b ill link it
Go for it. Id love to see it
💀
This is what I saw

Are you mixing shit up?
so does this say that every male has to have stupid takes about things that apply to women.
This is obviously dumber but I dont want to argue with this person
Does this say that u have to be a woman to talk about stuff that applys to women
Have i said that?
weak ragebait
Pls argue :3
ive seen better from you smh

its always peak cinema to talk to this minority of extreme people that think theyre the cream of the crop of intelligence but lack reading comprehension to a degree that i genuienly ask myself how they made it past the account creation without being offended.
Guess they got the paqt tutorial
the goat of making accounts
I need more people for the tournament, please join the game

XD
Diabolical saying Lol
If you take longer typing paqt will probs also jump in here and tell us to hop on arena instead 💀
Anyone wants to group to queue for domination
I already went into one, sorry

when im in a strawman competition and my opponent is a supervive enjoyer
The idea that a man telling you a shirt is worn by a woman to sexualize themselve combined with you saying men typically have bad interpretations of these things presents the idea that you did not seriously consider the point because a man made it and they are not thr best judges of why women wear the clothes they do. This like Luke said disparages men for a perceived fault without actually examining the argument. It could be that men are bad judges of why women wear the clothes they do and that person could still have been right about why that woman wore revealing clothing. I simply took that argument to its logical consequence. How can I as a human understand why nyx an Ai wears those stupid boots?? Humans have had bad reads on Ai before right? It dosent really matter what my argument is. Because some people have been wrong about it before that means my argument should be immediately disregarded
The moral authority on what women are allowed to wear without sexualizing themselves talking rn
bro just doubling down on another strawman
It was also a bit of hyperbole
the actual conversation you're referring to was talking about keyholes in women's tops, and you saying it's worn commonly without the intent to sexualise oneself
then me saying that just cause someone doesn't have the intent to sexualise, doesn't mean that a piece of clothing isn't societally seen in a sexual context
in the same way that i know plenty women who wear lingerie as part of an outfit, without the intent to sexualise
but lingerie is still inherently a sexualised type of clothing
I dont like that argument because its strawmanny and unproductive. Sexualization is a topic men should be able to communicate about without being immediately disregarded because of bad apples in the bunch. Furthermore even in the original argument its true that women wear it to secualize themselves sometimes. Thats not even a bad thing. I dont even see where the original argument was so bad it should've been disregarded

'you are a man so you cant have an opinion on this' is a stupid copout answer that means literally nothing
Easy revive
I am not offended by this (because I think your stupid anyways) but I guess it was important to clarify that point for the other dumbasses
i'm nb, i'm usually treated as "one of the girlies". i discuss these things with my female friends all the time
I dont rly care about gender and allat (thats why my pronouns arent listed) its reductionist and stupid no matter where you fall on the gender spectrum
you can wear alot of things as part of an outfit and its still not seen the same as it would be when worn alone.
The entire point i made back then is that at least where i live i see it quite common and that again, you are no societal or moral authority on what women wear.
Skirts are also often seen like what u claim about Keyhole tops, Cami are much much more revealing than keyholes and are worn by women in public in summer for example, i made a ton of points that u back then didnt even engage with at all just to make the same point u made back then now thinking i wouldnt just tell u the same thing i already said in the example
Incredible name calling
So based
I think the 4 people who actually take this topic seriously misunderstood that most people are just trolling you
Oh yeah I know
Thats why I didnt type an essay to u bc ur obv trolling
I'll just be upfront
idk why you say this like it's something to be proud of
like it's some big own
And like that's fine half the ppl in this thread troll to some degree
But nerryl actually believes what hes saying
it just shows you are disingenuous and can't engage in a serious conversation
Thats why I typed the wall at him
Because I'm not terminally online enough to give a shit like you.

Also he said im ragebaiting and I dont like it when my serious point is confused for ragebait
Le hyper owned!!
fellas is it terminally online to question systematic sexualisation of women in media
Yup i agree with the latter largely, it doesnt change that i didnt make the point that every man shouldnt talk or only has bad things to say, i didnt even state being a man as a reason, but much rather the thing that i wrote directly after that as a cause for why i think people say dumb shit on the internet
is it terminally online to give a shit about women and how they're treated
Yes
No
People have an extreme opinion and will say whatever they can to just keep that opinion, its just looks alot more stupid if its also something that is so stereotypical that its laughable hence why i brought up that example to begin with
it just gets thrown around at everything atp lost all its meaning. Youre terminally online nowadys for just liking a streamer atp
No, but how you go about it is
Omg thats a cute wolf
the ragebait was towards asachi who has been doing it this entire time if you havent noticed already lol
Wow you didnt give a single heck about this Darn...
Oh well
Now i feel stupid for typing that essay
Well, as i said, reading comprehension is something people lack in here broadly.
isn't it your job to make sure they don't do that
mr strawman has something to say about reading comprehension
True!!!
ironic
I dont think thats a reading comprehension issue i just think you weren't very clear about who you were referring to
Most of the people in here without reading comprehension are the people who are to ragebait
No lol
He was doing it towards me twice
Did he try to ragebait anyone else? Hes been argueing ur points.
I only ragebait back
he straight up said he doesn't believe in anything he's said
and you want to pretend he isn't ragebaiting lol
the entire ragebaiting attempt on me was to ridicule the points made to begin with
mr reading comprehension
Some people in here have a goal to ragebait and never to actually talk avoid the topic
And you allow them to derail
I think thats weird
where
Where
@flat grove are you trying to tell me this guy is not ragebaiting?

the guy who basically said 'im just ragebaiting yall btw i dont actually believe anything i say'
is not ragebaiting
give me a link not just a screnshot
You can search for the message with Discord's search function on the search tab
I cba to scroll through every convo and get cancer just to prove a point that you then wont do anything about personally
its just generally something youll be asked for since screenshots can easily be forged.
and i cba scrolling if someone already has the message up anyways
#1407460293281583124 message
Yeah man I think this is forged
Actually
isn't that like
your job
I was trying to reply to it, mobile discord is ass
reading comprehension has nothing to do with missing a message, its about understanding the message u read.
You cant lack comprehension in something u havent even seen.
thanks
The entitlement bro
im not getting payed.
If you already have the message up and ask me to act on it the least i can ask for is to make my life easier to just send me an actual link instead of making me waste more time for it lol
If you replace job with role does anything about that statement meaningfully change
No, obviously not, im not getting payed, i can accept dealing with assholes as clients for as much money i get payed to deal with it
im not gonna deal with someone being an asshole for free xD
how is it being an ashole for me to expect a moderator in a discord server to use the discord search function
yes youre an asshole if you pull up a message, already have it infront of you and know where it is exactly, get asked to use links instead because of the possiblity of forged screenshots, GENERALLY, not just because of this situation and then demand I HAVE TO do it myself because asking for u to provide me with something you already have infront of you is apparently outrageous xD
Like get a grip
Nasty read. Atleast soften the blow a little
For who? Dude was punching air
Since this post seems more like a place where people vent their frustrations, I'd like to say that I'm still not happy that Theorycraft chose a beach theme for several characters and didn't make skins for those same characters.
I wanted my
Elluna
beach themed skin, and all I got were drawings of an impossible dream

Theorycraft missed an incredible sales opportunity there 😔 🤚 That day I almost lost faith.
Nudeson summer skin
I still don't know how they managed to do two recolors of the base skin, but they didn't bother to make a beach themed skin.
Should've been a whole event with a beach themed map mannn
Ig if we make it to summer they can do it again
also thought its weird, even the meme summer skins in league are extremely popular
like look at pool party reksai
Its high quality
And creative af
And kinda funny
Like the goggles even tho mf is blind are what sends me
Gimme pool party oath
Would be peak
Or a beach themed beebo
so much potential, give him one of these rescue rings so he stays afloat and doesnt harm his circuits xD
Thatd be so PEAK
Hudson with suncream on his nose like the true boomer he is ong
Turn his hammer into one of thoose lifeguard floaties
XD
Bro comes in like Hasslehoff
SHEESH
Hudson summer skin were he has a grill on his back with sausages, his weapon has 3 different BBQ condiments as barrels. The ult is just a giant spatula.
Wearing an apron saying "Kiss the cook" or something corny like that
Nah make his ult a grill fork
But yeah
And all i asked for was a funny nose GET THIS MAN ON THE TEAM RIGHT NOW
that would go kinda hard ngl
elluna with one of these rings would also be funny since she was the og abyss floater, generally i think that skinline would go crazy on the more creative characters to begin with
Theorycraft, please listen to these kind and understanding people and give us beach themed skins (preferably Elluna).
Instead we got the millspec hudson skin thats REAL low ball and the one were he just has that dumb ass bald head 
That's what sells, not the hastily done recolors in Paint.
😔 🤚
I genuienly dont know who actually likes tacticool skins at all
At least league did it with their rather funsided characters (omega squad)
or they have stuff like headhunter akali that just fulfills that evil vibe enough to work for me
Well, we also have the Elluna Angel Soldier skin and the Oath skin, which are reminiscent of those from Odyssey.
cool skins 
yeah they are nice but i feel like most skins are kinda within that theme
But that might be just me
Im honestly not sure. Seems to just be a very "safe" and "easy" skin line to do
That's why I'm asking them to make skins with varied themes. If they had released summer-themed skins with the event they held, that would have been a good first step.
I'm not saying the skins that suddenly appear in the shop are bad.... well, many are very simple, and it's obvious they only put effort into one out of five.
its just after buying my first few skins i never felt like buying another
if that makes sense
its just the same shit in a diff color
Woooaahh woooooaaah chill woaaaah
But yes, I don't really want to buy any other skins, well, the Elluna Sanctuary one interests me
mostly because it reminds me of the sanctuary theme from Kingdom Hearts
off topic to this thread but you probably shouldn't spend any more money on a game that'll most likely have its servers taken offline within the next 4 months
I mean that's entirely up to personal preference
They can do what ever they want with their money. Might not be the best idea but hey. Their money
Yeah for me I rarely ever buy skins because it just doesn’t feel worth it to me. I’d rather buy new content / a new game for actual gameplay
But I don’t mind other people who like to have a full collection of skins
Okay, I appreciate your concern, but I must tell you that you haven't seen any announcements about the game closing in 4 months, so that personal opinion is, well, not yet valid.
Besides, I don't constantly buy skins in the game, I only have a few select ones.
So, here’s a female character from 1997 that does what SUPERVIVE should be doing: Pink Ostrich from Battle Circuit.
Any mounted character could be hella cool
probs hard to design but its worth the effort imo
I wana see supervives take on a rell type design
she'd have no armor and an inexplicable hole on her shirt where her cleavage is
also no transformation because that'd require a female build which is not just skinny young lady
Okay this is going too far
Points that are valid:
Character design is a bit generic
Obs gooner coded
Let this be my opinion
I just believe they wouldnt bother because by design theyd require going outside skirmisher/fighter with something unique. Dont think they have the resources, time or manpower to achieve this.
They didn’t make said characters goonable enough
They went for the middle ground, and received mid results by splitting their target market
One can define success by the number of posts on rule34
By this metric, supervive is lacking compared to it’s competition
Therefore, the only rational choice is to commit to either gameplay focused designs that clearly indicate the character’s role, or just full goon
As clearly, the artists cannot land the perfect middle ground due to insufficient talent
Convo ended, can we go back to discussing actual game design instead of finance
Neither matters at this point. There are years worth of feedback and discussion had on the game design of this game that has resulted in nothing. Maybe a dev had a crack at it and made the armory instead
Yeah fair
More or less using this discord as a sounding board for game design research at this point
dont bother with them, they cant be reasoned with
I mean you can say this about everything. Generally just making something that isnt as dps focused as the entire roster would actually help alot with variety.
But yeah, weve been saying this since early playtesting days
"give us something that feels like an actual tank"
Give us a guardian
To this day KP is the only thing that comes close but even he has very hit or miss cc
Oath also is alot more of a bruiser than an actual tank
i mean dude can oneshot
why even bother atp
I wish their combat design philosophy went deeper then just "Kill enemy". They cant really do a proper tank or enabler support cus every char has to be able to 1vX
yup which is imo the dumbest turn this game ever took
making a team game for solos is making a game for noone
They didnt commit to a vision. There is also the thing were they had The 👑 whispering sweet reset mechanics and clip farm mechanics into their ears.
And other content creators and closer playtesters who they seemed to actually partially listen to seemed to really like 1vX fantasy
Might have something to do with not having a dedicated combat desinger
Yeah or just someone whos ideas of how games like this should be dont really work nowadays
Like i still cant get around armory
Who greenlit that and how did they all believe its a good Idea
this has never been something people liked outside of singleplayer games ever
Like a lot could have been avoided if they just HAD an end goal and didnt "Piss while running" how a finnish saying goes.
Scandi sayings are banger lmao
Its a good one 
I play with a bunch of scandi dumbasses every weekend so i hear them alot lmao
theyre my goats
Well the desinger for it was the guy who said LOR failed mainly because it wasnt greedy enough and lacked retention mechanics.
Totally didnt have anything to do with the fact it was competing with FUCKING HEARTSTONE and had near ZERO super unique qualities.
(these days it has a niche as a cool cardgame roguelike and is doing pretty decent)
could also just be that virtual tcgs are dead but sure whatever xD
god bless the LoR lore tho
Like yes they COULD have been greedier with monetization, skins were kinda shit. But like that was deff not the main reason the game didnt do the best
well i guess retention can only be achieved with systems that make everyone that isnt ahead of the curve feel like shit
Surely they will want to grind instead of quitting lol
didnt do anything that unique and was competing with an established game of the genre
I feel there is a case of the devs at TC just being out of touch with their players. You kinda see it often with large game companies these days.
ill never get how people with those kinda mindsets have a job in this industry ngl
Like how out of touch with what people want can u be in this field
League has been nailing it for months now and theyre alot bigger all it took was to listen more lol
Im in uni rn for game dev btw. Ive noticed that half the people studying here are there just for a paycheck.
i dont think anyone makes games for money man
its one of the most brutal fields with the most shit pay
Its the main reason im not doing it
Thing is they wont make it.
Im kinda insane and obsessed with game design so I have a shot lmao
Gotta brute force it
I pray you actually have a chill live with it, I might work way too much because im just making software for db management and workflows for insurance and banks but at least i get payed enough to retire early
I cant fathom making games paycheck to paycheck for half of my life ngl
Its kinda weird how it works. Some people just get in due to nepo and never get thrown out. A lot of gamedevs grow an ego as well.
Then the nepo ones form their own studios were everyone is out of touch. Or they keep hiring people like themselves and then you get companies like Ubisoft
Ill never forget how they were complaining about Elden Ring UI lmao
"I STUDIED THIS THEYRE DOING IT WRONG" oh shut up
Seeing these AAA companys die nowadays is somewhat of a breath of fresh air ngl
We need more indie studios
Elden ring ui is ass just like how controls for ds2 are ass it just doesn’t matter because the games are so good
I dont think the UI is ass, its different but it works
You can ignore some polish if the game is a masterpiece
You dont need a minimap with 10 arrows and icons that show u everything around u constantly to be able to navigate
You can ignore some polish when it has little to no effect on the actual end experience.
I think no mini map is fine
The game used elements within their world to highlight stuff instead which btw, THE SAME DEVS PRAISED WHEN WITCHER 3 DID IT
That’s not ui…
not but its tools to free up space for UI that actually matters.
I’m talking about the inventory management and paging through items at npcs
Its a company culture thing. They are in their own inner circle, bubble.
Elden Ring could keep things barebones because they did a ton of other stuff
The Sony buyout in question
Calling the ui bad because its missing things it doesnt need is peak Ubisoft behaviour ngl
It wasnt surprising for me to hear, i had 2 friends that worked for ubi and keep telling me it was the biggest waste of time in their lifes
Kinda similar to vive dev obession with retention mechanics. If it doesnt improve retention imediately why do it?
I dont get where this bs even came from
no matter how many retention mechanics u add to ur game
if it feels like shit to play people wont engage with them
its so funny to me that they sacrificed most of their existing playerbase to get new players in that never came lol
But your opinion is invalid because I was taught at riot that all that matters is retention and marketing
Playertrust and fait has no meaning when our retention chart for newbies went up
I dont even think riot cares enough about it to the point that it actually harms the gameplay in any considerable way
Like the only thing i remember is when they added duorestrictions to soloqueue
Funny enough that fucked riot over too
That will result in you getting a random player on that level
They just have a titan that is too big to fail
But they released all those $500 skins and shit which lost a lot of player trust alongside other things
I dont think anyone really cared about those on social media man
But it wasn’t that big of a deal because league players are fucking addicts that could never step away from the game
Doesnt matter what our excisting players think because the new players will replace them and stay due to retention
I stopped playing because of it
I mean if that makes u stop, i dont think you cared about the game to begin with
I stopped playing when the first 200€ chromas came out
I dont like it either but its just skins at the end of the day, im still getting chests and i play because of the game like most people that stayed ig
I thought it was disgusting that a company would be releasing $500 skins and $200 chromas when the game is lacking quality skins and in a horrible state
It’s just disrespectful to players
They improved on the game alot and its alot better rn than it was 2 years ago, do you still think you shouldnt play it?
I dont think its disrespectfull at all, if it was a champ with no quality skins at all, id get it, but most of the stuff theyve released in that regard was for champs that already have a ton of skins
I never spent on league to begin with
The moment the 200€ chromas happened I knew it was downhill for skin quality. (it happened as I predicted)
These days I am debating on returning because they have been slowly turning a leaf and listening more to their players. Which I do respect
this was also adressed like 6 months ago
or 9 atp
It’s like what happened with tarkov and their $250 shitter edition
with the first battlepass skins beeing rather poor in design, so they ended up focusing more on making better skins
Yeah ive been waiting to see if they actually stuck to it
And most of the skin releases since have been better
the only issue that still remains is particles effects sometimes not being applied to like theyd be on other champs within the same skinline but i feel like thats more of a technical issue since it seems to apply to lux and a few others mainly
Once there is something that catches my attention Ill probably hop on league again. The new aram mode made me play a few games when I was bored and without my desktop. Downloaded league and played some augment aram with doo doo frame rate
Aram mayhem is the best thing to happen to league in years
and tbh, sr is also pretty good
soloqueue will always be cancer unless they actually ban trolls
I was never much of an SR guy. Neverhad the spare time to commit to longer matches
Just went aram with friends
im the opposite id rather have long good matches than a bunch of short ones
but i play aram mainly atm if i play league
I would have loved longer matches but. Doo doo internet, no uninterupted long periods to commit to league kinda stopped me from doing sr
These days I do have more free time cus I live alone and attending Uni (I am efficient with homework and classes so I tend to have good free time)
Just been wondering if to try dota 2
but Im affraid of crippling moba addiction 😭
Itching for a game like supervive but you know
I don’t think you want to use this example as what defines success.
Pokémon alone is a good enough reason how many “fans” of that franchise need their hard drives checked.
All attention is good attention
For sales at least
results may vary by level of depravity
And with that, Family Guy gets another season.
Would recommend making some practical projects / doing commission work
Unless you want slop for the rest of SUPERVIVE’s life, you have to pressure them into actual changes.
Agreed, made an entire thread on that
Main problem supervive has now is the question of if it even has the funding left to keep the game online
Maybe the devs could turn it around, but I wouldn’t bet on it
It’d be a far more rational decision to make a new project with what they learned from supervive
Will probably do it soon ish. Need to get my C++ basics down to be more confident in that
Nah skip that, straight up open godot
Make new scene
Make game
Do got a classmate doing a project so could join him
I actually spent the last 5 years working on a project, but I scrapped the engine I was working on.
You do not need to be a god programmer to make a banger game
I know
But on the bright side, the last 5 years were also used to learn the basics of C# so I can make an even better game.
Id rather start by designing simple systems and understanding how stuff works that way. rather then putting pressure on myself. or instantly starting a project I might not finnish due to lack of motivation.
It’s very niche but that’s where the market is
Not a bad idea, I started out by making a common api for all my future usages
It’s… a bit bloated now Kek
I have an idea for a game in my head. I dont have the technical skill to execute to the level id wish. So why not just design modular and simple systems that I COULD slot in to the game in the future when Ive accured enough knowlege and experience to actually make something
I know the designers have a allergy to armor but thats a bit harsh
Like an inventory system and what that could look like.
Simple project that works. Key being it is a FUNCTIONAL and WORKING code I can showcase to someone in a portfolio if asked
I feel having multiple smaller projects that are all working and finnished might be better then a few ambitious projects that I never got around to finnish due to feature creep and lack of motivation
Anyways its mid night I go sleep
Late to this but I would fucks with a character like this for vive
Much more intresting than most of the base roster
as someone who played a ton of lor it is definitely because they didnt monetise enough lol
it had plenty of unique mechanics idk what youre on
Do you also think them locking everything behind paywalls would have made the game better?
I'd say there are kinder ways to monetize content without paywalls
you guys are so active here.. wtf!
this place became the main Supervive discord n the other channels are just for newbies
two days ago, (or somethin) i read a comment , i think itwas jockertior
Jockertrion
let me check
bro talking about ui and then brings up hud as an example
you seem to have a lot of opinions about things you don't seem to understand for someone who complained about people having opinions on things they don't understand
ok u guys r talkin i dont wanna interurpot u se e ya
@trim ingot yo bro, i thank u so much..
You don't believe how much happiness and relieve you added to my life..
I've been on this platform since long time. and I read hundreds of lines..
I never until this moment, found anyhting close or as valuable as what you said my dude..
I think you don't mean what you said.. but I thank you so much.. for this..
I never knew it existed...
if you can guess what im talking about, which comment i mean, i will ssay that ur a genius
but thankyou anyways
@raven frost I thank you too both of you
somerthin he said, and then i did a research about it and it was true. then i came to write him a thank u msg.. i wrote these 4 lines, then got distracted n did't send them until now
i wanted to check what he said again.. and it appeared that you said it as well
i think before him
but i read it when he sent it
lets see if he will know. if not, after couple of hours (i will copy paste it )
patience
or if you will know
i think it's the most valuable thing you said in your life maybe
and i also think you don't mean it
i dont wanna judjge u, but just sayin
nice status you got
btw
someone french sent me dm, tellin me, why do you have this on ur profil;e ? i told him i have what ?
he said on ur bio
i told him i dont wrtite a bio.. i dont know i just keep it empty
Well thank you but im curious what did I say?
Im a little confused on what i said to make your day
you were talkiogn about something that doesnt look good
and you said, and before you on this channel @raven frost said :
this thing is ugly
how much ugly was it ?
it was as Ugly as >>>> ??
Sin
yes
I checkd where did you get this from
and I was very happy to know that.. and I really wish to both of you and everyone to know and be sure that it's the truth what you said
thats it.. now i have ot go! love yaaaaalll in case i got banned!
❤️
Took me 10 seconds
Didnt age well
Lmao
Your lack of shame and self awareness is hilarious
Mere Sequence 8 instigator
Begone
Says the mod believing that parasite machines are trustworthy.
In fairness he is still right
Your Hud is part of the games ui
Its not about being right or wrong for them they just oppose me with everything they can because they mad
Dont bother with them
If you cant argue the points made just make up a point that wasnt even argued
Googles ai quotes its sources directly you can klick on them and itll allow you to see something usually written by a human, its good for a quick overview if youre already informed enough and are able to view it critically
Guess i need to apologize for thinking that you were able to
Also hating ai unconditionally is at least as stupid as trusting it blindly
Its a tool. Use it well and its usefull
Im honestly just responding to people atp man T.T im exposing myself to braindamage so much i might have it myself now
real
at this point this thread is to argue over nothing
i don't even rember what the original purpose was
truly a war without reason
can we rename the thread to "fight club"?
Supervive in general has probably reduced my total IQ by around 7%
you forgot to add a 0
Thanks
What a great thread
Ik nerryl is dumb guys but are we serious arguing hud isnt a part of ui
We dont have to argue about everything
Here ill get us back to where we should be
We all know nyx does nkt accurately display the fantasy of a death knight but what about a reaper
Like I think nyx is a pretty good reaper of souls instead of being a soldier of death
Yeah
I think if TC leaned a bit more into reaper shes much more cohesive as a character
She would be a decent reaper
But rn she looks more like a bezerker than a knight or reaper
Design wise sure but her voicelines rly scream reaper
Either way if I can get a pentakill style skin for her I will be happy
SEZ U XD
the guy that started an entire argument about reasoning that i contradicted in the same message he took it from xD
The internet made people way too comfortable with themselves to the point yall be completely delusional publicy, with all messages still up and quoteable.
R u talking about me
?
You didnt contradict yourself in the message I was talking about first of all
The two statements u made could coexist
I didnt contradict myself, i contradicted ur dumb conclusion
Because i knew
Its not hard to tell
No you didnt
you guys rage at everything i say
then i pick everything apart
and then u stop responding
My conclusion stood regardless of what you said
I dropped it because you said you didnt actually mean it the way you typed it
I'm confused as to how this is even still a thing you are talking about
The reasoning was stupid I called it stupid and you said you didnt mean it like that so I considered it not a big deal
No, i never said i didnt mean it, i said directly on the message that the reason why that phenomenom occurs is strictly because people with extreme opinions are very vocal about it and that its just funny that the person doing it is participating in a very big stereotype, in the same message.
I didnt know it bothers you still nerryl...
I know youre dumb
but you should be able to get that much
It was never my "reason"
I never said so
Everything but admitting that ure wrong even once
XD
So instead of actually argueing points we just go and shoot stabs at eachother in unrelated conversations, calling me dumb just to say that im right
:D
You do realize that everything you are claiming others exemplify are also descriptors of your conduct in this thread?
And we are already back to fighting
Show me where i called anyone dumb for saying something right.
Oh no, youre gonna do what u did last time and just talk a different point because u cant.
I dont think it follows logically that you specifically stated the reason that you disregarded the opinion was because a man said it and then you say the reason is because "people with extreme opinions are very vocal about it"
You dont mean people in a general sense then
Do you think using a hyper specific test like that disproves the entire point?
You meant men
#1407460293281583124 message
that i even have to quote this again xD
Again how is this related to you specifically singling out men???
You dont mean too many dumbasses you meant MALE dumbasses
Yes? And the point the person made was wrong, thats why i called the conclusion dumb
Thats not me calling SOMEONE dumb over a point that was right
Like
XD
You said you disregarded his opinion because he was a man
You are not the authority on something being correct or incorrect?
That was your sole reason
So I dont understand these arguments about how it was actually general
Sure, if the statement was 2 + 2 = 73 that sure seems like a dumb conclusion
hey guys i think we should all stop talking and become friends
But we can restrain ourselves from calling other's opinions dumb, no?
So apparently, you are the authority on knowing what i meant to say, even tho you cant make any point towards it, because last time u tried u just went off the point to argue something else, which was also wrong
It was wrong
get over it
#1407460293281583124 message
I said this.
Again
Big circle around it
read it.
Same message btw xD
Like c'mon it's not even hard to scroll up and find a relevant quote of you arguing against the very thing you are actively doing
Surely, this means the dude is the reason why i thought the point was stupid, not that the point in itself was stupid
Whats not clear about my line of reasoning
And surely, I didnt call the opinion EXTREME in the message right after that one
SURELY
XD
Yes, a dude making a stupid point about what women should do is worse than when a woman does it
I mean sure its extreme but you make a very large point about how a major reason you disregarded it is because a dude said it
This mischaracterizes the argument though
It wasnt about what they should do
Yeah, I also don't listen to women when they talk about MANLY things. Imagine a WOMAN trying to have an opinion of FOOTBALL. LMAO!
It was about a reason why they do it
Same energy, no?
Good luck with that lamo
No i never did. The reason why i stopped interacting with it, is because calling out women for sexualizing themselves for wearing a top you personally disagree with is one of the worst things going on around that entire debate
Its on the same level of "she was wearing a skirt so she was asking for it" its not that hard to get that thats way worse to say than just being a man xD
Okay so that by a dude stuff was emphasized because you like emphasizing things unrelated to your point
This is a very large logical leap and you know that
It wasnt unrelated, i just said its much worse if a man propagates something wrong about women than when a woman does it. A man does not speak from his own perspective as a woman because hes a man
Thats not that hard to get.
Sexualization is not inherently a bad thing tho
Surely we are not going to take the worst presented argument in the thread and attempt to say that it is representative of the entire thread and all who have even possibly thought that there might be some uneven presentation between men and women characters in the game are 100% on board with it?
does a woman not reserve the right to sexualize themself bro???
They can choose to
That can be empowering for anyone
You are choosing my arguments for me. You can't do that
But you wont get that anyways
And who exactly is designing all these pornbait female characters?
He didnt speak over them though
Men.
He just said that could be a reason why
In response to you saying they do that
Im not sure where the disconnect is
My bad though. I can see you are very opposed to constructive feedback and self improvement. I will no longer make remarks in an effort to convey such meaning.
I find this argument extremely disingenuous
(That is mild sexism 🙂)
A bit more than mild
Bro shut up man xD, youve not made a single valid point outside of stopping people from bumping threads.
Which btw, i time out people for by now xD
What are you doing here
Yet you propagate blatant sexism and anti feminine points to be a feminist just because u want to be against me xD
There is a world where we can agree that secualization is empowering and can also tell a story with a character and also think that character designs in supervive are bland
Hot damn! As the determiner of correct and incorrect statements, that has to be true. Let me go find some women to demean.
🫡
Maybe
Yes, thats something that people determine for themselves, unless youre argueing facts. Most of the shit you tried to argue was either about things i disagree on you with or just stuff that was simply wrong
Who wants to become friends
outside of 1 case where i agreed with u because it made logical sense to stop nuts from bumping a multitude of threads lol
How is having a bunch of greasy creeps leering over you empowering, exactly?
Id also go back to this and say its not very hard to find data that women wear clothing like that in a sexual manner (sexual according to them) becuase they like wearing it and being sexual
Because that's what objectification is.
How do you start on the correct side of an argument and progressively post more insane shit
Yes. Women can wear tops like that to sexualize themselves. They can choose to. Women also wear alot more revealing stuff for the sole reason of comfort, especially in summer for example
So because a few women think they look hot in a top
ALL women are sexualizing themselves when wearing it
Smart take
Chat is fighting again...
the family's fighting again...
So you agree that they can wear it to secualize themselves yet you disagree with the argument that the chatter made thag they could wear it to sexualize themself?
Sad
Bc he didnt say all iirc
It wasnt a could
It was a direct statement that they do
XD
No he said, wearing the top is choosing to sexualize urself.
Can u find it btw
Its ok if u cant
Wow thats like whats happening
I personally think if he said it like that thats dumb obv
I cba, i quoted those messages multiple times throughout the thread and even if i did, youll disagree with me still and be like "yeah but"
But I dont remember that convo going like that
We should all be a Super Family
Ill just go, get my fries outta the airfryer
pop open a monster
and watch some trash taste
U quoted it but like
W Family
I just wanted to see the comment and decide for myself
Regardless of whether u find it or not
- Whether he said like that or not I think that statement should be disregarded because its stupid whether its a man a woman or an enbie saying it
I'm the one pointing out that saying stuff like "sexualization is empowering" is only helping the creeps who think they own women's bodies.
also i think if i actually look for the message, ill probs have to see his drawing of the dick cutout again and id rather not
just search for his messages and "top" youll deffo find the convo there
Im out fr now tho, the fries be waiting
- It is incredibly hard to believe your original comment was not made with emphasis on the men part.
BECAUSE that reads like a reason you stepped away
I dont rememebr this happening but im scared to go look now
Im not prepared to go that far for this
Knowledge has a price
You realize that in the process of making that argument you were very sexist?
Do you think maybe you should reflect on that
And what you said
Let me guess, I'm being "misandrist" or whatever buzzword's on your mind.
No
You were being sexist TOWARDS WOMEN
And I dknt think this is the first time you've done that
TBH it's less about creeps thinking they own women's bodies (as this implies intent, which is really hard to guess at without knowing the design team personally) and more about leaning into using sexualization to sell to gamers (which is easier to both understand and prove via observing the designs and comparing them between the genders)
In ur crusade against secualization ur making harmful statement and bad arguments about the people ur trying to defend
"Erm, you're the sexist one for pointing out the sexism!"
You didn't point out any sexism tho...
I've done nothing but point out sexism talking about this.
But I guess that doesn't count because it hurt your feelings.
TBH everyone getting focused on this idea of a specific clothing choice is pretty silly from both sides. It's both pointless and unrelated. Hyper fixating on it is leading to a lot of conflict that doesn't need to happen.
I personally think the keyhole argument is stupid
the dickhole was valid tho
i got my fries what did i miss
This discussion is still going on after 3 months…..
The keyhole is at least less desperate than Mercury's underboob.
You were sexist, it got pointed out, you then turned it like "no I'm the good guy here". You're doing that exact same thing here and have been.
The entirety of the conversation is pretty pointless tbh
In regards to the specifics of exactly HOW tc has done what they have done
The comparison between the body shape outlines was effectively the end of the thread
Yess lets end this Family Feud
As an ex professional lor player and current high level hearthstone player I feel I have to give my input here
Hearthstone was at an all time low when lor released so they weren’t really competing
Most hearthstone content creators jumped ship at the time because of how horrible the meta was
Lor was revolutionary as an online card game and yes it took some ideas from hearthstone but the main issue was riots endless desire to print money and poor marketing
The game very well could’ve been successful just never as successful as league or any of riots other cash cows so they made a p2w pve mode and called it a day
Also I cannot state enough
There was NO marketing done for the game
Sadly Im aware. Necrit probably did more marketing for the game then Riot themselves
lack of marketing was fatal. Dont think any amount of greed or retention mechanics would have helped the game. Which was my major critizism of said developer.
Really liked Lor. Udyr self dmg burn was a fun deck to play around with
Slap a few of these guys down with the Ram stance and youd chunk enemy nexus for a good amount
Bonus points if you got regen on one of them and now their attack and dmg removal aint doing jackshit
Peter from Family Guy would agree with that
I am familiar with that
u are not lying lol
that guy might be a good ragebaiter tho cant tell. he might be too committed to it and i cant see it lol
I wish I understood this graph, is horniness both the x and y axis???
well ye
the strawman GOAT
or i guess this is more of a comically false equivalence
this however is just another strawman
it's kinda funny how often you strawman me
i'm beginning to think you're arguing with someone you made up
like you read past everything i say and just argue with whatever point you wish i was making
You calling it a strawman instead of calling it a lie is literally just giving it everything it needs lol
i'm just a vessel for you to project your fictional debate opponent onto
well a strawman is by definition a lie because it is a misinterpretation of what i said
You said enough ridicilous shit
no point wasting your time on me cause you already won the debate against the fictional character you created
also this comment is a lazy cop-out considering you personally deleted said image
A strawman is by the definition not a lie.
Its a point made on something unrelated to the actual point that gets argued.
Thats why its called a strawman, you arguw something else to avoid argueinh something you cant argue to begin with, which i also never did
But yeah again, waste of time
you're just arguing semantics atp
but sure, then you were just straight up lying about what my argument is
not much better
I wasnt sure and i deffo wasnt going to check. I delete multiple things daily. Youre sadly not the only one crazy enough to post something wed have to delete
you seem to be pretty allergic to the search function for someone whose role depends on it
Sure whatever bro. Ill just trust the guy that doesnt even know what hes saying. I honestly dont care enough anymore to search out the specific messages
Just let it die and stop @ing me
why are u talking in the thread if u dont want me replying to it
im literally the op of the thread bro
I just hate quoting things for the 50th time just because u cant give up after saying crazy shit
Let it die
well maybe you should stop quoting things and look up the actual message instead
cause every time you've quoted it you have misrepresented the original argument entirely
Even if i did quote exactly what i said ud just argue it and start making the same points in a week from now
I cba
You did this for like the 3rd time
glad to see the personality of this character you've imagined is being expanded upon
Really need to stop wasting my time on extremists believing theyd ever change their minds
Youre too far gone
Peace out
#1407460293281583124 message
#1407460293281583124 message
i scrolled up one single conversation and you mischaracterised two seperate arguments
my goat
you genuinely have a talent for this
Right here. Most of the chain there for everyone that is interested in knowing why women show any patch of skin = they choose to sexualize themselves.
I made the examples with camis back then since its one of the most worn tops in summer here in germany and not seen sexually at all, which is usually a piece of clothing alot more revealing and you kept pushing back that any bit of cleavage cant be worn casually
The only talent you have is to argue this now even tho in that entire chain u kept trying that wearing specific pieces of clothing are inherently sexual which is literally the point i made. Even lingerie can be worn without the intent to sexualize oneself.
The entire function of a corset is to get a tighter waist for example that isnt inherently sexual either some people are just insecure with how they lock or just like the pressure it applies.
No piece of clothing is inherently sexual, they can be worn with sexual intent or not and youre not the moral authority to decide wether it is or not
"you kept pushing back that any bit of cleavage cant be worn casually" literally never said or implied that
Now stop bothering me for the love of god
"wearing specific pieces of clothing are inherently sexual" nor did i say this
again, you're arguing against an imaginary person
"Even lingerie can be worn without the intent to sexualize oneself." funnily enough this is literally something I myself said and you're trying to use it as an argument against what you think my argument was lol
Mb i accidentally deleted the quotr
Thats exactly what u did #1407460293281583124 message
Actual dementia
in that message i clearly state that most cleavage can be worn casually, and that it is specifically keyholes that have a sexual connotation
did you actually read the message you just linked
keyholes are a very specific clothing trait
not equivalent to just 'any cleavage'
#1407460293281583124 message
Yes the point were u basically went backwards on it and basically said "yes they can but theyre still sexualizing themselves"
Like theres not a ton of women that just combine mesh tops or other stuff with their outfits and noone sees it as something sexual or even notices its a piece of lingerie
Clothing isnt sexual.
and no i never said they ARE sexualising themselves
i said that there are certain types of clothing which are SOCIETALLY considered as sexual
i.e lingerie
There u go the moral authority on whats socially accepted again
accepted?
when did acceptance come into this?
you know that it's also just societally accepted to sexualise yourself right? or to wear clothing which is generally considered of a sexual nature, without the intent of sexualising yourself?
societal acceptance has literally nothing to do with this
you literally strawmanned me again there and now i'm having to argue that no, i'm not talking about fucking societal acceptance
Oh sorry. Gotta update the title, the moral authority on whats socially considered as something sexual again
XD
well i don't need to be a moral authority on it, this is a well established fact
lingerie is literally a type of underwear, first of all
You are not one to speak for the entire population.
and second, it is -- officially -- considered a form of intimate apparel
If logic is a criteria and the reason for it to be sexual is cleavage why are camis not sexual
They inargueably show alot more
well i'm not speaking for the entire population i'm speaking on what is broadly considered the societal norm
well 'just showing more' isn't really a criterium
Ah ok, so we have the authority on what is or isnt s criterium for sexual aspects too here
well i'd argue there isn't really a logical criterium for what is socially considered sexual clothing because it is entirely based on history
and on intent within the design
I dont think most people see a keyhole as somethint sexual. Theres lingerie that makes use of keyholes, but that doesnt mean every keyhole is inherently worn or even seen as something sexual
and yeah, i'll concede that i was being hyperbolic originally in implying all keyhole tops are considered sexual
I also think the main criteria in law for example is how revealing ur entire outfit is, its imo also seen as the main criterium by most people
yeah but 'revealing' doesn't usually equate to just a percentage of skin shown for most people
it tends to be more about what is revealed rather than how much
A hyperbole is an exegerating meant to be ridicilous and yet u argue me calling you out for saying something ridicilous for an hour again
This is why i wont even bother engaging with u anymore
Its the same shit every single time
a tall, long-sleeve dress with big cleavage will generally be considered more revealing than a short sleeved shirt with some shorts for example
a hyperbole doesn't need to be ridiculous?
it's just not meant to be taken literally
Youre so extreme in ur own mindset that ull argue with someone that doesnt even disagree with you just because being 95% agreeing isnt enough for you
You either get the 100% or the people you talk to are the devil
i don't think you're the devil
i just think you're not very smart
to put it mildly
and i think you engage in bad faith
I could say the same about you
i also think personally that you have a bit of a complex going on but that's not as relevant
You literally had to go back on what you said multiple times atp because you dont even know the words you use
Like my initial point to this was literally that the top is unfitting but acceptable and the design overall being nice and you still cant get over it lol
i think that you have to view the design through the context of supervive's previous designs
and that then the keyhole top becomes a very obviously deliberate choice to sexualise the character even when getting so close to their first non-sexualised design
it's like they have to tick a checkbox that says 'cleavage'
or the design isn't finished
I think that u have to view any piece of art on its own. All of svs early designs and generally most of the designs are not even something id consider up for debate for this to begin with
but the 'piece of art' is supervive
the game
it's one big whole
her design is merely a piece in it
the design exists within the context of the game
But even considering that, a ton of things go through an artists head when choosing different options. I think that its alot less likely for mercurys top to be an innocent choice than nyxs for example and i dont automatically assume that nyxs top follows mercurys just because mercury was made
The piece of art i was refering to are the different hunters, my bad authority on what a piece of art is
the mcdonalds just burned the previous guys' burger, and now there's loose charring on the bottom of mine. can i be annoyed that they didn't clean up the grill properly or do i have to go 'wow, they really cleaned up their act. my burger isn't burned at all'
luke said one 'you are not the authority on this' comment against you and now it's all you can say lol
Ah, the piece of art of making a mcdonalds burger
me when analogy
Lets make a comparison to something that doesnt even have people that consiously try to make artistic choices in their product to something that does
I think that its alot more likely for nyx to be made without trying to push some goonerbait than mercury for example. I can still think the top is unfitting without dumbing down the entire argument to "dont like the top so the entire design is bad and harms women"
Again i dont even like the top myself i want armor and just generally less streatwear ish designs, my issue is just not sexualization i just think the game tries too hart to fit that neonpunk category to be cohesive but just ends up having alotta aspects within designs that end up making alot feel very samey
You can even see this with skins
But we never even got to this point because youre so extreme about wanting to make the entire argument about a top that is literally worn casually to the point it wouldnt even stand out to most people in most of the world that there is no discussion about it to begin with
Yet u claim im the dumb one and im the one that argues in bad faith etc
Just move on.
i made that argument once and you are the one who kept bringing it up later on (while completely mischaracterising it)
Agree to disagree and free up the space instead of argueing stuff you literally said when you get quoted just because u urself realise after a ton of messages AGAIN that the thing you said was just dumb
Dude drew an entire dick cutout and still thinks hes the normal one. You only chime in here to put ur weird idea of sexualization on everyone
of course i'm going to argue you when you keep mischaracterising me
and i'm conceding that my original point doesn't really stand but that doesn't change the fact you completely mischaracterise it over and over lol
If you dont want to be quoted as an example dont engage in discussion. Dont claim to be mischaracterized either you literally aknowledged urself that it was stupid to claim that wearing a top doesnt automatically mean that u sexualize urself
.
i literally never claimed that
holy fucking shit
CLOTHING BEING CONSIDERED SEXUAL SOCIETALLY IS NOT THE SAME AS SEXUALISING ONESELF
You are not the authority on what the society sees
In some places this can definetly be true, while in others it wont
it honestly feels like you're trying to bait me into like saying some shit you can ban me for or something
because you are being comically obtuse
Clothing isnt inherently sexual its the ideas propagated by people that make them.
Lmao no
it seems the only times you can properly understand my argument is when you're trying to use it to argue against what you think my argument is
Neryll is it considered wrong by society if I were to type a slur right now in this chat? Would you take action against me by deleting the message or banning my account?
it's kinda hilarious
the two times you have actually said something I MYSELF was trying to argue, was you trying to use it in response to me
It causes alot of logical harm outside of societal norms too since slurs or at least the bannable ones here are usually things that are used or have been used to inflict harm at some point
Who are you to decide that? You aren't the moral authority on society
Im not. TC and the ones that made the rules are.
And its not society
Its this community
They sre the authority of whats acceptable here
you are not the authority on what is and isn't considered society
I just act on it
Oh, got ya. So you think I can go out to my predominantly black neighborhood and shout slurs with no societal repercussions?
Youre on their discord and agreed to follow their rules
Is it acceptable within that neighbourhood to do so
you are not the authority on what rules i did or did not agree to
Dang, so you think a good way to tell is to examine other people's opinions and sort of get an idea of what normal is
