#The female character are not just oversexualised, they are straight up poorly designed
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
#1407460293281583124 message
Let me just forward this so people who are actually in good faith see it.
that thing is disgusting lol.
and saying its not good faith bc u are offended i think that something u are praising as a good design is some sewer trash is too funny
this guy mad hes not getting to goon to what he likes
LMAO
im gonna lose my mind LMFAO i looked into that game cuz i never played
like 99% of the cast looks like its furries
thats the game where everyone makes inflation mods
so u think a rat with a karate belt is good design?!
for the characters
im gonna lose my mind bro this is fake lol
yea idk man
idc what they goon to
And that’s without getting into the other female characters Rivals Of Aether has.
Just because everything in your life revolves around sex doesn’t mean everybody else’s does.
if you want a rat in a mech suit why does it need to canonically be a woman for you
genuine question
so they are all skinny ladies too in that game huh?
weird... u are praising that game and have an issue w this game.
Well, if we’re going by your strawman, it would be a breath of fresh air compared to most of the female Hunters in this game.
and the only difference is that game is fully of animals this ones full of humans lol
why
how would it change the gameplay
at all
"it would be a breath of fresh air to have a female rat in a mech suit"
that goat lady is wearing 1 article of clothing covering her crotch how are u not enraged at that design lol.
i just couldnt imagine caring about this ngl
You’re just being a moron for the sake of it. The goat lady Absa isn’t meant to look like a hooker.
lmao i feel that
thats why shes naked
also as a guy who doesnt know this game
i didnt think it was a woman
are you saying pink hair makes it a woman?
let me guess the karate rat that looks like she does karate also doesnt do karate? good design./
You’re just pulling out all the Gamergate crap, huh?
no idea what that is
what is this guy saying LOL
terminally online boomer terms i guess
fr
By your logic, one of her inspirations should put some pants on because they’re in a kids game.
alien created in a lab with no genitals
put some pants on
all the pokemon should put pants on
bro you are really bad at arguing
almost like one of the games has animals in clothes, then some naked ones, and the other game has all animals without clothes.
does pikachu have clothes does bulbasaur have clothes does charizard have clothes
hello?
delusion.
see the reason pokemon arent sexualized is because they arent designed to be sexualized
this guy has CANNONS on his shell and still is not wearing clothes
by putting a tube top on a rat and giving her boobs you are sexualizing it
that is their design
and you requesting a tube top and boobs on a rat
why are u posting a game with ppl in clothes that has one lady character naked and saying its the same?!
LMAO
makes you a goooonerrrrrr
the pokemon fr are just mon. mon stands for monsters. none are wearing clothes.
ur karate rat game has clothes on. that means removing clothes makes it weird.
By your logic, Paladins objectified children because Talus isn’t wearing a shirt.
man u are on something.
With how much of a dumbass you’re acting like, that sounds like something you’d say.
bro wtf r u talking about hahahaha
its so funny that people think the devs are going to read any of the threads in this discord
just talking to a wall for fun all day is quite a way to live
i just feel bad cuz some of the ppl that are saying they want better female designs are not crazy and have decent ideas or points, but u just leech onto their viewpoint to push ur karate rat design and it makes them look almost as nuts as u lol
in the discord for a dying game based around mechanics and high skill ceiling
The only reason I’m this angry is because of dumbasses like you misdirecting the entire topic.
I was just like everybody else, but then you people decided to completely derail the topic.
And now that I’m fighting back, apparently I’m the bad guy?
Go fuck yourself, you stupid prick.
They do actually read them. At least the ones that aren't 1000's of messages long. Sometimes they'll check in on them but less likely
no one said youre the bad guy
you are putting that mindset on yourself
all we said is that we dont like furry karata rat woman in the female champ discussion thread
because it was my understanding that this thread was in response to the underboob on mercury
u are posting dogshit designs saying they are better than designs that are clearly better. u are freaking out callig ppl pornbrained while posting naked animals from ur game. like hello?
which it is, and is true
that goat lady is NAKED man
and i think EVERYONE agrees that merc underboob is probably too much
and that sure, there could be better designs than woman with boobs
and from there it seems
that you want to goon to a different type of content
and would like your preferred gooning material in the game
which is directly antithetical to the op
Again, go fuck yourself for completely missing the point.
u do that to urself first
Do you go to zoos just to tell the people there to put some pants on the animals, or is it different because you’re too much of a pussy to rage bait irl?
with ur lil karate rat naked goat lady game
are u crazy?
why does ur karate rat have clothes on
i just told u it makes sense for animals to be naked that is why pokemon makes sense. but if ur freak game has animals clothed, then maybe they should all be clothed bc that is the norm in that universe?
ever think?
Apparently it doesn’t matter either way with smug morons like you, so I don’t see the problem.
Ok, so you’re just lying about wanting unique female Hunters.
how does me saying a naked character in a game full of clothed animals is weird mean i dont want unique hunters? LOL
You just want to wack off to nearly all of them with how much you’re projecting about this.
u are doing ur freakazoid thing again where u completely ignore what someone says, put ur own view on it, then reply and argue.
yea ok mr naked animal game player.
🤣
That’s you, prick. You’ve been doing that for the last 30 minutes, and just projecting that.
You looked at a design that was never meant to be sexual in the first place, and then immediately acted like it was a sexual thing.
no actually kura just keeps saying "lets keep the gooning to a minimum"
That can’t be healthy.
Then why dogpile someone for something that was never meant to be sexual?
i didnt
You either don’t understand nuance, or don’t care enough because you’re a prick.
Sure, dude. Tell me all about it when you joined in with kura.
thank u bro u can read LOL
I don't think there's any major complaints not alr heard a thousand times
i never said the karate rat was sexual btw? i said her design is disgusting.
There is room to complain or talk about other stuff too
ur little goat lady being naked tho? thats weird.
Alright, explain why it’s weird.
when ur game has ppl fully clothed and one of them is naked yea its weird buddy. how do u not understand that?
why is it ok for one to be naked while rest are wearing clothes lol. and they arent some mythical alien btw they are same thing as the rest of the cast an animal.
Is anything about Absa’s design sexualized to you, other than the porn rotted part of your brain that says “no shirt = sexual!!!”
there shouldnt be i think the discord should be deleted
its not about being sexualized to me u gooner. its about it being weird in that games universe. why is there a naked animal in a game with clothed animals?
pokemon is not weird cuz theyre all not wearing clothes. why put clothes on a character then remove them for a single one?
and to make it worse...
heres the funniest part
THAT CHAR IS A GIRL LOL.
Because the design isn’t sexual in the slightest. That’s just your brain projecting.
You're kind of projecting your own dislike for the character designs when a good amount of people actually like them. A lot of them aren't even similar when you look last body types, which isn't even most of their main thing.
Both sides are to an extent kind of just saying "i like the design and you don't screw you". Idk about this being a healthy convo
wait
like u cant be serious u shouldnt be in this discussion if u are playing that and think thats a good design man
omfg LOL
so you think that mercury boobs are sexualized, but you think a naked woman in another game isnt
Goalpost moving isn’t going to work, moron.
a couple of them do wear clothes actually
this is more amusing than sitting in queue for unbalanced game so im enjoyin this
So thats not a real argument
where did the post get moved to
Try again
ah shit u got me...
articulate it for me
this guy wins gg
Instead of accepting that two things can be different, you just shoved it onto another hypothetical you created.
This guy just wants to project everyone as gooners, so what a female goat isnt wearing any clothes
Guess what
Maypul is a female ferret and doesnt wear clothes either
and she was named after Dan Fornace (the game creator)'s wife
so what now
no actually what i did was ask a question and you didnt answer it
Exactly.
I’ve seen toilets that aren’t as full of shit as @rotund crystal and @hollow crane.
it would be weird if she was a random person
hahahaha
so he married a ferret gg
you guys are arguing literally nothing
im not arguing w this guy lol
we are talking about sexualization of animals in a furry game with no relation to this one
hes delusional so i cant rly argue w him
I have 1500 hours in Rivals of Aether
its just talking and having him yell random shit in the background
IDC that I've travelled to tons of RoA tournaments and met actual furries, no one is going to try to tell me that its a furry game
u play that karate rat character?!
And you came in to hijack a completely valid argument.
Nobody’s perfect, but there’re no point in you trying.
this thread was created as a response to mercury having her boobs out for no reason and now gooners are saying "WE CAN FIX IT BY ADDING FURRIES"
The game itself isnt furry even if it does appeal to furries
furries arent unique or interesting designs either
for the record
its 2025 they havent been for a decade
Wait thr naked goat we were taking about was absol?
And also, theres characters like Kragg who is half rock
He's not a furry
he's a scaly
can be rock furry tho
It always struck me as “What if everyone was a spacie, but only with animal motifs?”.
As a rivals player (didnt play 2 tho) ROA is not a furry game
what is a furry game then
The characters are furries sure but nobody who plays it is like actually a furry
well there u go brah
brother
i wonder if sonic fox played it then u are wrong
Watch live at https://www.twitch.tv/jarek4gamingdragon
Support me on patreon! https://www.patreon.com/Jarek4
Join my discord here! https://discord.gg/K5M2wbf
Tweet @ me here! https://twitter.com/Jarek_Dragon
Donate to Jarek FOR FREE using gawkbox! https://www.gawkbox.com/jarek4gamingdragon
Sonic fox played MK
Proof that I was a top Rivals players
Is that a furry game?
Top 8 at Heatwave which was a supermajor and I travelled to all the events
I am an authority figure on this topic
I DONT CARE ABSA IS NAKED NO ONE IS GOONING TO THAT FCKING CANCER CHARACTER
Yeah but like ROA is not a furry game is the point
ill say it again
this thread was created as a response to mercury having her boobs out for no reason and now gooners are saying "WE CAN FIX IT BY ADDING FURRIES"
furries are not unique characters. putting fur on mercury wouldnt fix the issue this thread was created about
LOL
and derailing into "what about this game full of animals?"
I AM THE AUTORITY FIGURE HERE, EVERYON ELSE SHUT UP
is so stupid
UNLESS YOU CAN POST YOU HAVING A BETTER ACHIEVEMENT THAN TOP 8 AT A SUPERMAJOR
instead of a girl w boobs out... hear me out... what if she was a goat lady...
kura moving the goalpost once again
I dont think the take of thaylt we can fix supervive by adding furries is shared by a majority of the people in this thread
Olympia was just used as an example of good character design
the goalpost is in fucking space because no one is even on the fucking topic lmao
Nobody said that, you fucking prick.
This entire topic started because SUPERVIVE has too many bland, uninteresting female Hunters, and you decided to turn it into something it wasn’t.
I dont think shes good but ok
the topic was "mercury hsould cover her boobs up"
what is the topic btw? i just jumped in without reading the full context, and chose a side randomly.
wait this is a mercury thread?
this thread was made when merc came out. its about her underboob and how shes just a girl with boobs
Supevive girls are uninteresting
brah its just some boobs
hahahaha
i see more when i go to the beach
its abt the body shape of ladies being triangular
so youre back on our side
cmon breh
lets go
upper body shape lol
If you’re not gonna add anything substantial, then get the fuck out and let the grown ups talk.
@rotund crystal @hollow crane
and saying its bad design
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
boobs are ok as long as its not on an ANIMAL
whats your elo btw @heavy magnet
Im personally of the opinion that boobs aren't inherently bad
hold on honey pause my furry game, the adults are talking...
so you ARE on my side
Its rly everything else that is an issue
i have the same opinion boobs are very not bad 👍
no one knows ur side cuz ur opinion isnt exciting
anyone else share that opinion...
the exciting discussion is the goat one
i dont have an opinion i just found an easy target
The main thing i want people to take away from this convo is that roa is not a furry game
Also play roa
Idk abt 2
Of course you’d say that.
You’ve done nothing but miss the point of everything for the sake of leeching off of everybody else.
But roa is fun
its a furry game
Post a top 8
Yep
this guy just freakin out cuz we called him out on his shitty taste of characters lol
No top 8? Opinion discarded
yeah im leeching off the 4 people in this "female design problem" that no one that matters cares about
Ive top 8d a RCS
karate rat purple arm disgusting design...
naked goat lady in game full of clothed animals... weird...
no idea what this is youre talking about a game i dont play
Ok so you dont what wat ur on about
ive won a bunch of smash tourneys back in the melee days
Not a furry game
Fenrir is right
Oh, what gave you that idea?
smash aint shit compared to furry fighter
@heavy magnet how many hours in supervive do you have and whats your elo
Roa is way easier than melee
oh, then i wouldnt like it
and im not impressed
Idk how 2 is
Was if the fact that these two jokers talk like people that would be better off either jumping off a bridge or getting their Discord banned?
Never played it
so this guy freaking out over an easy mode fighting game with an ugly karate rat saying its good design?! WTF
you cant say "i won a top 8 and its easy"
@MisterSixtyFour how many hours in supervive do you have and whats your elo
NOW UR TELLING US TO KILL OURSELVES?
woah man too far...
@mods
Its slightly harder than PM
wait who called the karate rat good design?
i might like it then, i played melee but pm was my love
Way harder than like 4 or ult
mrsixtyfour
enjoy ur naked goat lady and karate rat man... dont need to tell me to kill myself...
the angry guy
Who said that? I gave you an option.
All the new characters outside like the original are cancer
HIM
Dan fornace was on the PM team iirc
he said the character design
Something tells me you’re reading into this way too far, man.
tetra is cool
slightly interest now
I mean in Rivals
@MisterSixtyFour how many hours in supervive do you have and whats your elo
its an ugly karate rat with purplew arm to me. makes 0 snese lol
for once in ur life you are right
why even do karate if u got a purple arm id just go destroying ppl w that arm
i dont understand why anyone should care about someones opinion on supervive if they are in silver with like 30 hours of play time
Idk about roa chars bc when I stopped entering tournaments I started playing Katie from the workshop
When I did tournaments I played zetterburn doe
Don’t give this guy the benefit of the doubt. It’s clear they’re just trying to distract people.
gg. the guy who got top 8 said im right so mister sixty four (top 64 ahaha?) ur wrong
kenneth on the right side of history
they made some of the cancer workshop characters into actual in-game characters....
distract people
bro
this thread is MEANINGLESS
it is a WASTE of TIME
the workshop characters had cool mechanics but all had rly rly cancer gimmicks
They didnt make rhe one i mained into one so I didnt rly care
you are being distracted by TYPING in it
distract ppl from the secret karate rat fanbase rising ... u caught me
The thing with these threads that i wonder about is..do people consider brall oversexualized because you can see his nips? What does an "oversexualized" male character look like? Its always only female discussions.
Let's find out #puttheminthongs
watch out theyre gonna call you a sexist for not understanding the difference between naked men and naked women
#nakedvoid
brall got his pink nipple removed so someone did feel some type of way abt him at one point
Honestly…it’s the same things that make some female characters objectified. It mostly comes down to certain details having the spotlight put on them.
Think that was a super common thread in the bug-report, its prob why they removed it
mistersixtyfour doesnt even play supervive he just wants to goon to the character models and he cant do that to mercury
It’s called nuance, which a lot of people either seem to struggle with or completely ignore for reasons.
Exhibit A:
if its true its a fair point
So, what is your opinion on shirtless nipple guys?
he dont mind
As long as there’s not emphasis on that, they aren’t objectified.
I’m sure someone here is going to try and move the goalposts when I say that.
he likes naked goat ladies too so why would he care about shirltess guy
i hate how this dude argues
its
bad point
buzz word
anger
in that order
over and over
how is there no emphasis on a dude with his boobz out?
he just half naked brah...
at least big fat hudson has some decency and wears a shirt
Hm. Do you think its possible to not sexualize bigger then avg boobs? I feel like regardless its always noticed even if not the focal point.
because theyre boobs
Right
idk who needs to hear this but sometimes, some people
they see boobs
and they sexualize them
@heavy magnet I just have one question for you since you keep on defending the naked female goat in the other game you play. How do you feel about Elluna being covered up in the beach banner, do you think she should be naked? That's all I need to know from you
Yeah, actually.
It’s mostly about emphasis, and not certain design elements.
Oh great, I thought you were on my side too.
THINK CAREFULLY before you answer
ahahahah
No, I don’t think so, because Elluna is a child.
WTF?
All I'm gonna say is I have you mate in 2
elluna is 24
My eval bar is all the way topped up right now
ah hell nah this guy
Guys I rest my case
I didnt wanna pull that card but sometimes you do what you gotta do
love this kenneth dude holy shit
Yeah, mods lock the thread, we got the gooner already.
What case? You just decided to turn on me for no good reason because you’re a smug prick who doesn’t understand nuance.
this is more amusing than superivive queue
the mods are now mentioned
I have been summoned
dont lock this place is good to have a chat
Thread has devolved
Oh, so when you don’t want your “fun” to end, you say the mods shouldn’t lock the thread?
Play roa 1
Go fuck yourself like every other prick here.
u think u have a word on what the mods should do after telling ppl to kill themselves?!
Fenrir is right btw
where?
Both of us got top 8 so we can speak objectively about the game
uh earlier he told me and nuts to jump off a bridge or something
sixty four guy told us to jump off a bridge for not liking furries
idc about it all in good fun ... right misterSIXTYFOUR (not even misternumberone?)
He didnt mean it, it was just over the top banter during a heated moment
need new server rule: no talking about the female champs
64 is getting heated, and nuts (and maybe kura now) are goading. best to shut it down.
yea we just having a discourse feelings get involved sometimes
havent goaded yet
chill
Although I do not agree with my opposing interlocuter, I would never ask for him to be silenced.
He is a good dude
im not goading i think that karate rat is so gross lol...
kenneth did way more damage than me
What the fuck did i just read through
Guys please
i mean u tell me man that karate rat is disgusting right
We are but fellow philosophers that walked down different paths
Its not furry
your entire thing is trolling, nuts. It's like, your MO.
Also can we get the next male supervive character in a thong
not anymore
I think that would keep things fair
Dang this thread moves fast
i calmed down when i hit master
then hes unique.
this went off the rails, and people that like... 80% agree are going for each other's throat because of a snowball of uncharitable reads. I'm sure the topic of character design will come up again, but feels like this one is not in a constructive mode atm.
i hate to be the one to say it but nothing constructive will ever come from a discord thread
i think its closer to 95% agreeing on the original topic:
merc underboob is unnecessary
i think most of well adjusted people also agree that it doesnt really matter at all
and that the game has bigger issues atm unfortunately
im trying so hard to understand mistersixtyfour's argument in all of this
someone summarize?
hes a gooner who wants furry champs and hes jumping onto the merc design bandwagon to try to get there
okay i thought so
and then responding with whatever topical buzz words might devalue the opinion of his opposition
"goalpost strawman gaslighting"
then when hes backed into a corner he just insults them
then people like me and kura and kenneth saw the thread like we're demonslayers
now you know the whole thread
its actually crazy how kenneth setup the most obvious trap card and he walked right into it
It was really back and forth tbh, u had to have been there. At one point multiple people were accusing kura of moving the goalpost all the way to the moon
but somehow he came back stronger than ever
a true underdog story
Mercury is so uninteresting to me that i dont particularly care. Game def has way bigger issues then character looks.
her kit is cool tho, moved closer to an actual support
idk if thats good for the game tho tbh
cant even enjoy the rest of mercury's character design bc them things be hanging out too much
lol
100hp on ur health bar is more than the size of her boobs
Everytime Im loading in my just assaulted
Interesting. I think i was like oh lol and never thought about it again
I see my glorious Felix i look over and its straight tetas
i think every female champ should be in a niqab
The tetas are bigger than Felix
and should be happily married
I'm on the menu a lot (we all are) so I see them hangin out all the time. We spend a non-negligible amount of time viewing characters front-on
you play her?
still want to claim you're not baiting?
My biggest complaint is that they feel out of place in her design. Like an afterthought to make her more appealing to players
Yeah she's fun asf
shes very fun
Swear when I went to unlock her her tetas slapped me in my fucking face
the underboob maybe but a woman having breasts isnt out of place imo
Yeah it's just the underboob
buried somewhere in there is my point: she seems spread thin on visual design elements, and the random underboob just is one more compromise to articulating her charactr.
That is true if you main her. I guess..im just not very sensitive to it? I dont know.
i think we all agree though
unironically
on that front
and her skin is dogshit
if her boobs have to be out rework her skin to be gooner but actually make sense
Her face is so uncanny its creepy
i think her face is cute dont talk about my supervive waifu like that
its mostly that i feel like alot of the faces look kinda similar
I feel like they could of went alchemy nerdy cute or something and no underbooba
But i dont care. In a dirty shrike main because i like to feel op
i used to be just like you
its not rocket science though. give mercury glasses and a wizard's big flowy robe or cloak.
if she has to have her boobs out put her in a sports bra like the rest of the cast
I just think having her bazongas halfway out isn't doing anything in regards to delivering her character and gameplay through visual storytelling.The more women this game has with big bahoogas hangin out the less impactful Eva's design is overall.
Sexuality is a very potent avenue of character design to explore who a character is and why they are the way they are. It's just that as the waters get muddied by adding more of the sexiness, the less that it actually ends up saying about the characters and the less visually interesting it is.
It's like how everyone was doing souls games for a while and it got very overplayed
Now the genre is all but dead outside of FromSoft games
Too much of a good thing kills the good thing's value
no one can make dark souls besides fs
by that logic tho
they should just stop making this game
because fortnite and league exist
Wat
u cant compare "everyone having sexy champs" to a whole genre of game
every game ever made for the rest of time will have women with big boobs
i dont love it but i think we know its reality
It was more of an analogy that too much of a good thing can be a bad thing.
Even people addicted to adult content end up needing to keep upping the bar on what they consume as the regular stuff starts doing it for them less and less.
So I don't think booba are exempt
I don't mind hot characters. I just think that it should fit their design better and they need a good amount of contrast in the roster or their design will fall flat
yeah but i dont think trying to have the 4000 people playing this game (half in asia) fight the entire marketing world by reducing the size of mercury's visual breasts will fix that
Yea thats fair.
Yeah like we're definitely not at the iversaturation point yet
I mostly don't like Mercury's design because of how it feels out of place
she literally just needs a robe
If another Eva-like character eas designed where being hot was the point I wouldn't mind at all
a big robe that covers her whole body
that would tie the entire champ together and fix the problem everyone has
Okay well maybe I would mind. But that's a little off of the current topic
And a different argument altogether
Next character thread? Maybee
Lol
I'd just point to the community redesign that was made within like 2 days of her reveal. It made her look so much more cohesive overall and it was more than just changing the booba. Lemme grab a link
yes pls
I kinda wonder in 2025, if like people have a vision, would it be better to just have a censor/censored toggle for original vision and more acceptable?
i think that the money and time requirement for this make it not worth thinking about
#🎨│fan-art message
I might have wanted to see some more detail on the white shirt, but overall I prefer this one significantly more than the og.
I love the softness added with this design, it really adds to the support/healer feels. The coliur changes on her metal elements also hit a bit more for me.
Maybe. Surey mercury toggle would be simple? Some designs may be tougg
ngl at first glance all they did was make her shirt longer
i get that they add frills and stuff but i didnt get the feeling she was a girly girl from the before or after
i feel like a big robe would make her seem like shes actually an alchemist
I'm not too crazy about the pointy gloves but I can see how that communicates she's also a damage threat
Yeah like protective clothing cinsidering she's working with dangerous chemicals lol
Of SOME sort
Generall healers in video games have some form of white as one of their main colours, Merc has some but maybe not quite enough imo
id agree with that, but think green would work too
since alchemy
Yeah that could vibe for sure
Depends what green though bc it's harder to use that as a "good guy" colour
Jusging from her design they want her to appear more friendly and less foreboding
zeph does it
True. He has a pretty light/desaturated shade of green iirc and his other design elements seem to help balance it out
i always do
sucks that that guy stopped responding ngll
now im bored again
u guys wanna see a crazy play i hit yesterday?
hahahahahaahahaa
even my tetra posts are me oneshotting dudes with relics!!!!!!!!!!
time to eat my icecream
What ranks do queue times become awful
diamond
not only is the time awful but playing is awful cause u still get gold on ur team
u can do it
nice. i like ghost in abyss a lot actually lol i get so many low abyss kills cuz ppl eventually tap glider a tiny bit
anyways... this discussion not abt that...
yea i think ill be there soon. i usually queue duos with someone and we haven't really fit a difficulty wall yet, but solo queue sounds miserable
agreed
fr, its supposed to be about boobs
I feel like we all basically agreed and this is the most active thread
yeah im just using this as the main chat atm
i do kinda wish the top topic was something more relevant to the actual issues with the game but what can ya do
its been beaten to death
true
and everyone has a different opinion on what the issue is
there are people that will tell you this is in fact the game killing issue
there are people like me who will tell you its the marketing
there are pros who tell you its the solo q expereience
there are people who have no critical thinking that say player count is the issue
i dont even mind a thread being about the designs or boobs. but this thread i really dislike lol. talking about a triangular shape for all women then ignoring some triangles on dudes. saying oath is a rectangle when u look his top half is triangular etc. like that stuff is annoying to me.
i read a lot of the top of this thread and i was kinda laughing a lot because i just didnt care but it felt so serious
and to relate that as bad design is the annoying part. u can find a diff way or reason for saying its bad design. maybe u dont like boobs being out thats fine but saying a triangular shape bla bla like wat?!
it is srs bro...
dont fk w our triangles
lmaoo
lol
its because its a discord
everyone thinks their words have weight and that they SHOULD say them
and if you have a topic sort of adjacent that you wanna discuss
you just throw it in the adjacent thread
I feel like thats just 2025 and internet for sure. I don't know, i dont really get offended and if i don't like something enough i will just walk away
Classic
current internet users were simply not built for it
they werent forged in the fires
hyper sensitive era, i miss old internet
bring back gatekeeping, let things stay coool
so true
old internet was literally the most pretentious cringe shit ever
disagree
you must have been in a different corner of it, and thats on you
but when my runescape friends sent me cool emo songs on youtube
it was very fuckin fun
and when i shit talked randoms after pvp they could handle it
I find modern social media is so cringee
its a poison
old youtube was oozing passion
old internet was people doing things for a reason other than monitary
clickbaiting garbage everywhere is rough
current internet is a bot farm for extraction
That was so funny to read
thank you
holy shit he left the discord hahahaha
this is the power of 45 poop emojis, never forget that
nah it wasnt even his thread hahaha
Was he upset female characters look like females ?
he was upset that they werent furries, yes
His bio says it all
oh oh, careful. That's what I said and I got a 12h timeout
😄
I'll be careful thanks for the heads up
mistersixtyfour was genuinely one of the most sane people in this thread btw
That ain't saying much cus no one was sane when they were typing in this thread
He dmed me and said hes sorry he just got rly pissed off at them
He quit supervive now
I had a guy quit cuz I told him the forge resets every season
that guy was not sane. pete/miles are sane. that guy told everyone to block me the first time i spoke in this thread because i disagreed with it lol.
He was not sane but he was quite the competant interlocutor, calling out every time when someone tried to move the goalpost
I'm sane? Holy shit that's great to hear
dude was kind of a loose cannon
seemed to let his anger get the better of him
which is unfortunate
I think the wizard guy was the most sane out of anyone here. Keep it a buck. Game needs more wizards
He was sane when he wasn't calling people predators lol
The one banned for what, an antisemitic crash out?
Nah he was always a clear parody sock puppet mocking anyone asking for representation in games.
Yeah fair
Kura you have shown you can be very dismissive and rude, I’m not surprised that someone would react to you rashly in an environment like this. To say he is not sane is very cruel, i think you should try to find more humane ways to say you dont fw someone.
that guy literally told me to kill myself. i should find a humane way of saying i dont fw someone?
please read before talking. every single one of that guys msg was dismissive and rude. i at least listen to ppl and reply with my own view, that guy just says anyone that disagrees is simply a gooner who loves big boobies and likes to wack off to mercury.
and to random losers that tell me to kill myself over a characters body in a game yea i am rude so what? im not rude to any of the other ppl? there is a reason for that.
I did read before talking please dont speak down to me. I knew it was a mistake trying to be civil and ask for kindness. He already left, you dont have to be that way. This was a mistake, i cant deal with people this harsh I’m not built for this.
how am i being harsh for saying someone that told me to kill myself is not sane? and how is that comment more acceptable?
bro WAHT how did i miss that
i dont think kuras message is harsh
this last one at least 😉
I missed most of it myself. The wizard guy started necro'd the thread to insult Tiamat, then when tiamat clapped back they did what seemed like a dog whistle (several emojis including the star of david?). I think the bigger issue was an explosion they had after the fact, which got them turbo banned by mods.
and all messages purged
LOL
for the crashout, or was something deleted you're bouncing off?
thread keeps pinging way more messages than are here when I check.
only reason i asked
what the fuck lmfao
He was the guy who started saying supervive girls were being dressed like hookers so im a bit skeptical of calling him one of the sane ones
I've seen at least 5 different girls today wear something like crysta, soooooo yea...(it'd prob be higher if I went outside more lol)
The weirdest part of that is That's a lot of women in gloves.
our media has kind of conditioned us to associate any moderate amount of skin showing to equate to sex-work or a lack of social dignity in women
Practically all adult media when I grew up in the early 2000's was very all in on this
I mean... "sex sells" is very popular.
50 poop emojis. LET'S GO
Man shut up. It's all phrasing of the topic name, and this is just the last instance of a half dozen recent threads, most named less confrontationally and negatively (and gee, as a result don't have the same reaction). It's always the one phrased negative enough to get a reaction that people decide are a referendum on the community.
Nevermind the fact a bunch of those are just paqt sock puppets
#1401018031722729552 message
Hi just chiming in to add the to the point that phrasing and language used is very very important to the conduct of ensuing conversation. This thread remained largely respectful throughout
I went out of my way to write it as comprehensively as I could to keep the topic on track
shouldn't have had to, but I did and it worked
Im not allowed to use palestine flag emoji im pretty sure thats anti semetic
🇵🇸
Cant react with it
Huh
interesting counter point
Guys, we can go much higher. Let's reach 69 poop emojis to seal the deal
cant react with any flag, its a bot that translates to that language
or it should
not sure if its working
sure just boost the server and u get a new color
Wanting more diversity in female character designs seems perfectly reasonable, until you start narrowing it down to say "no body shape sliders", "more non-humans", "more unattractive characters".
1st: You can call it a strawman to say that means more 'fat' 'ugly' or furry characters
But it really isn't. After subtracting 'sliders' 'human shapes' and 'conventional attractiveness, that's all that's left
2nd: Once you realize that the people asking for this are just looking for subversion of norms around REAL-LIFE women's appearances you realize just how unhelpful it would be for a character designer to actually take that advice.
This is because all the good character designs I've seen are done 'constructively'
Take Celeste: ice dancer/ballerina motif with a magical tutu of icicles. Conveys a unique but simple theme perfectly
Contrast: Zarya from overwatch. Built like a truck to be subversive. Haircut to be subversive. Entire design seems oriented around what the designer DIDN'T like and makes for a meaningless design
They could release a clone of Reksai (from league) a giant monster who digs underground, with mandibles, and it wouldn't matter. This clone could be female, just like Reksai, but it wouldn't move the needle for those wanting more diversity among female body types, because it's not human. They could easily have made it male and it wouldn't matter except to be subversive. All of its unique intrigue would be overlooked by these people who only care about how subversive it is
TL:DR subversion is not meaningful because any interest it generates is only in contrast to what's being subverted
ERGO the only thing that actually matters is 'constructive' character design, and 'female body type diversity' is just a distraction from that.
news flash for this chat...
what this guy yapping about bro
just give me my hot booba women and ill swipe
is there anything more to think about?
thats not what hes saying
hes agreeing with u guys
hes saying if a small group of people claim to want interesting characters but then say "there are only skinny boobed women"
they dont care about "interesting" they care about sizisms
when they gonna make female pudge from dota2
i think every female champ should look like eva
honestly just put eva in a different color outfit so i can tell them apart
but reuse her model 10x
and every male champ should look like kingpin
I and a sizable chunk of the internet disagree with Zarya's design being meaningless. If that's how you choose to interpret it that's a totally fine take to have. But the fact remains that she is instantly recognizable and a beloved character in the Overwatch cast.
I simply disagree that a meaningless design can achieve that.
Especially if they're not conventionally attractive.
It's about visual appeal
idk what ow characters look like let me go check
I don't think Supervive has a design that isn't visually appealing in some way
But the designs become much less distinct and by proxy less striking when every other character looks like a reskin of their body in different clothes
Each Vive design in a vacuum is a good design
But when it becomes a standard of twigs, the next twig in line has a much harder job of differentiating herself and standing out from the rest
Mercury stands out because she's a bit bigger and has a big ass hat
I like that
i agree on the surface but if one twig has ice powers and a ballerina outfit and the next twig has a cowboy hat and a gun i can still tell what kinda spell theyre about to cast on me
Yeah I agree on that
and u know im not trying to argue
im just sayin from a gameplay perspective thats all i ask for
thematics
Yeah and that's valid
I just think there's a lot of room to really lean in to what makes them different, and that can reflect their gameplay better visually as well if done right
fair
If Zarya was as thin as Mercy her design would be all the worse imo. She's an off-tank and her build needs to reflect it
do u think the solution is to rework current cast or to have these "different" characters come in every once in a while?
sure but diva is a full tank and she is a skinny kpop idol
(weak argument)
(actually its a really bad argument on my part)
Definitely just be more conscious about it going forward.
(im just bored)
The current designs are fine. If the vacuum gets expanded in a way that they start to stand out against the rest of the female roster in the future then it kind of solves the issue
In some form
so what % of the cast that have stronger/bigger/heftier/different designs should be designated to being female, specifically so that the female cast dont all look the same?
cause i think thats the issue u will run into when arguing with internet people
once u say "x% of y has to be z"
thats when the babies start cryin
if u see what im sayin
Tetra specifically I might want to see bulked a bit though. She's tankier than half the dps cast in the game and her build is skinnier than almost everyone else female or not.
Doesn't matter if she's shredded, bulk is bulk. Muscles typically indicate a threat or strength, size typically indicates health or defense. I think Tetra has a disconnect in that regard right now
i think tetra should have the illaoi build ill give u that one
I think designating a specific percent is too much. Stuff like this has to come naturally during the design phase on a character by character basis or the designs will come out worse for wear.
for sure, but if theyre not imaginative for the next month or two and one doesnt naturally come around then we just have this thread repeated again
Ideally just having their bodies reflect their health/damage/mobility capabilities is my baseline.
Yeah. Part of me wonders whether this is a role choice issue (the role they choose for new characters) instead of a lack of intentionality with bodies in design issue.
Nah he's just typin up something
thats kinda where i was gonna go next
Probably a long msg
like, if they knew next champ was a healer, and what the kit would be
it was always going to look like mercury's build
physically
I'm utterly baffled by this point. Like... It comes from a state of so many hilariously obvious inconsistencies. Celeste's design is a pure articulation of her theme with 0 outside factors. Zarya must entirely be built out of contrarian influences, has no visual language to speak to other than "subverting expectations" , is somehow not successful in anyone, and clearly the designer didn't like their own design?
Nah, was just making sure I was reading the post I was replying to right
word
Either way
Zarya's design is proven to have mass market appeal
And is very iconic
I don't think the argument that her design is meaningless comes from a place of bad faith
I just think it comes from a place of poor understanding
Or personal biases
Like I can call Hatsune Miku an uninspired meaningless design
But I would be very wrong
Despite my personal distaste for that style of design
Tl;dr:
It feels like I just read a "I don't like this so it's bad" take
I'm not calling it bad faith. I'm saying it requires slanting the respective design critiques so much they are held to hilariously different standards, complete with presuming the desire and mind of the designer.
ik im sayin for the post in general
not every lady is a freak of nature built like a deep freeze
some ladies p chill cool hobbies like crystal scientist that also happen to be fit (crazy right in a place where she perma fighting n movin around) 🤷♂️
what if they were also a rat
and they used their crystal science on their fists
to do karate
Okay. But not every woman is 18-29, thin, athletic, and pretty. People broadly are not saying conventional sex appeal or conventional body types should never be applied. Just that it should not be an exclusive requirement to letting a female character exist. You pose it as "why aren't you letting them be x" when the critique is "why are they only x"
bump
I think it's gotta be a pretty fluid fraction
And it's not easily quantified
Very vibes heavy thing imo
I think the perfect ideal is probably to have equal amounts of every type. But I'm hesitant because I wonder if in the noise of the diversity everything will suffer for popping out less. Maybe this wouldn't be an issue if the designs were quality enough. I'm not experienced enough to know for sure.
There shouldn't be any set percentage (and I think supervive is neither the worst of this trend and has done plenty of better moves alongside a few disappointing moves) of whatever type. There just shouldn't feel like rules that restrict female character design in they can be, what they can look like, and what kinds of interest they are designed to spark.
aside from merc having underboob can u give me an example where theyve failed to do that?
i think even aiming for "equal parts of every type" puts designers in a box instantly
because it is saying "alright guys dont forget when u ideate for the next champ we DO need a fat girl"
"keep that in mind"
100%. That's why I mentioned earlier that it's gotta be a vibes based thing and not a set percentage.
again keep in mind im speaking from the point of "this is what the internet is going to say"
idc either way, ik i keep saying it but still
i just play ghost
yea they are 😏
I will say, just to put on a note of positivity, the animal diversity in this game is quite good. We have a bunny, a fox, and a monkey. I hope we can get a cute cat like Yuumi next ^•^
i want a wolf
yeah a naked one that does karate
Something I've before is that individual designs are not an issue (or at least not as much an issue), but the fact they always conveniently steer to a much more narrow cluster of design priorities adds up to a trend. Tetra one could argue works as a small, petite young woman with overlarge gauntlets. She's young, inexperienced, and dwarfed by her own power or legacy. But they chose that archetype over any where she was say more physically built. Myth is a mystic archer who (less so now, but very much so originally and still somewhat now) has ghostly themes, yet at no point was she like, emaciated or ghostly in any way that detracted from her being attractive. Little diversions where they keep them in a safe zone of character appeal in a way that, in sum, builds to a fairly strong pattern, and clearly male character designs are not so limited.
well shes an archer i think that would dwarf her being some sort of spiritual medium
or doubt that being a medium would make her slow somehow
and i guess youre speaking from a more thematic standpoint
idk its hard to build any sort of meaninful character backstory when i still dont even know why theyre fighting
or what supervive is about
or literally any single thing thats going on in the world
are there any champs you think would work fine if they switched from a guy to a girl?
Oh okay, so wat characters have their archetype or narrative set up in a way that benefit from them being a specific gender, or would at least hit very differently, versus characters whose gender is agnostic or at least peripheral to how we read those characters?
yes
I made an argument, then followed it up with what is obviously an opinion. Of course I don't know exactly what the designer of Zarya had in mind when creating her. I was just saying that it SEEMED like Zarya was just created with a social agenda. Other non-generic Overwatch characters don't suffer from this.
Also I never said 'subverting expectations' I said 'subversion'. In this case what is being subverted are social norms. IE I was arguing that Zarya was created with a social agenda and not with 'good character design' in mind, and the design suffers as a result. Really just strikes me as a future-soldier 'Rosie the Rivetter'. Agitprop.
Also worth mentioning is that I am slightly biased against Zarya in particular because her haircut exploded in popularity and I find it ugly.
Counterpoint is that people who remember Overwatch 1 fondly as the cultural phenomena it was may be biased towards liking Zarya's design, where I don't think it's aged well. If Zarya was released for the first time as an Overwatch 2 character, she'd be seen as painfully generic.
All of what you're saying here are valid observations. I just think it's a good thing and not a bad thing.
IDK why you think Tetra isn't muscular. She's the only one with fully modeled and sculpted abs in the game.
Sure, Myth has a 'ghostly' element, but she's also a huntress. If we presume she lives off the land, she'd have to be strong. She's not a ghost herself...
myth
i dont think the texture argument matters at all here
I suppose your right, the point was really just that Tetra IS muscular.
She doesn't need to be built like a male powerlifter. She is what a really strong woman would look like
Depends on how you're defining her strength. She'd have great pound per pound strength, but she looks 100lbs at most meaning that her max lift is significantly lower than a more built woman.
ok, have to act in good faith here
No, I don't think Tetra falls under that category. I think she could be way bulkier to really sell that.
Again, Olympia from Rivals Of Aether did that way better.
Even though she's scaled down to stay in scale with everyone else, you can really get a sense of power from her design.
i agree they could build her like illaoi but they wanted a vi champ
What I'm getting at here is that he body does not sell her strength relative to the reast of the cast. She still looks like KP or Brall would crush her without thought. If she's meant to compare, she needs to have a body that sells it.
...All I can think of is Kingpin dunking Tetra into a basketball hoop now.
When you're dealing with games like this, body size is completely divorced from strength. Now I'm imagining Tetra with arms as thick as Kingpin's
I'd agree if the visual disparity between female and male characters wasn't so big
so what are the options
we need a fat girl, a huge muscle mommy, and a child?
several people are typing
Anyways, I think anything goes as long as it's not something that looks like it could have been made in 30 minutes with HeroForge.
...Actually, no. HeroForge has actual options for female character design. 
Not inherently. With designs based around tools amplifying strength like Crysta's cannons or Joule's electricity you can get around needing a relevantly built body. Tetra while amped by her gauntlets has moves in her kit that would require her body to support the kickback from the strength the gauntlets provide (Charge lmb, rmb). This isn't a realism thing, it's a cohesion thing. She looks like the kickback from punching kingpin would send her tumbling, she doesn't have the weight to ground herself in the punch.
She seems to draw from fighting physiques but with the amped fists. Fighters need to be able to plant themselves because without it their punches would hit like nothing
And that's with regular fists on a regular human
Fun question! Sorry for the delay, had to try to put a toddler to sleep.
As you allude to the fact they've yet to find outlets for direct character lore in game have limited them, and that limits our understanding of character lore and how 'critical' someone's gender is to their character. At a glance I would say
Ghost seems to have lore (some kind of military background) that while not exclusive to men, the basic disregard for the lives of soldiers and the inhumanity imposed upon them is easier to do as a guy.
Jin and Hudson aren't inherently masc characters (the grim edgelord made into a weapon and the gruff mechanic are tropes that have worked on female characters before), but come down to relationships - we know Jin is motivated to avenge a younger sister his grafts made him forget, and Hudson is supporting Bishop and you could easily see as having a paternal role to her. Of those, I don't think Jin's 'I need to protect my younger sibling' is exclusively masc, or even necessarily hits better as masc. Hudson is more convincing works better masc just because we assume a certain aloofness, an emotional remove or inability to state care except through service, and that kind of fits (that's not true of course, just narrative tropes).
Kingpin, Void, and Saros all could work as women, but would probalby end up hitting different. Kingpin is voracious hunger and braggadocio the character - you can put that on a lady, but you'd have to commit to being a specific type for that not to land a bit differently. Ancient sages you kind of truck in different references - if Void was a woman we might start thinking of her more as a witch (either in the 'wisdom of the cosmos' or 'wild card outsider' ways). There's a paternalism implied in his character, and going femme would make it more a maternalism. Saros it's really just how we read his devotion to Helia, the sovreign of the Sunswept. Each of these could work another way, but would read a bit differently.
Carbine, Felix, and Wukong probably could all work femme. A ruthless bounty hunter who got uploaded to a robot after a botched job is hardly a masc-only trope, Felix's social rejectiona and scrappy lil' loony tune aspect is pretty divorced from gendered tropes, and Wukong seems a wide eyed adventurer on a Rumspringa equivalent - outside eschewing the sun wukong ref a bit, that easily can and has been done on female character.
Zeph and Brall are big black holes. No reason to think they couldn't be done femme, but that's unknown.
Oath and Beebo are dudes in name and language only - neither has anything like genitals or socialization as we would know it. There's still something in that we assigned these pretty sexless beings the idea of being a dude, but that's outside our scope.
no worries on the delay i will read in a moment as well ❤️
i feel like shiv is already female carbine, thematically
i dont know the lore mind u
I think they both try to hit similar types of cool, certainly
The slick and ruthless gunslinger
In terms of lore involvement I think he's a bounty hunter with a grudge against the mark that totalled his body, she's the enforcer for an evil cyberpunky empire of resurgant elf-equivalents
Tl:DR - Beebo and Oath could be literally female with just changes in language, since they're beyond really counting as either narratively
Carbine, Felix, Wukong, and probably zeph and brall work either gender,
Kingpin, Void, and Saros would probably read a bit differently though you could find a femme equivalent without much issue
Jin and Hudson work both ways but could alter our sense of the relationships that define their motives, though I think Hudson's flavor might be more influenced by his gender than Jin's in that.
Ghost is largely unknown but is implied to have a role of martial service that usually is more easily explored as masc.
- Rosie the Riveter as a hero shooter character you say?
That's pretty much exactly Rosie the Riveter
yeah, 100%
My larger point was not that Tetra is bad design. Her design works for what character they chose, by and large. But they conveniently chose the tropes and vibes that would push her towards a more safely marketable body type than say one where she has a more zarya style build. And it's okay in a vacuum they did that. But they seem like they're conveniently funneling their female character types to those same couple of clusters, and that's a specific choice that I think limits their design freedom.
not enough fanservice
Not to say Zarya's build was the only other choice ofc. I personally would've gone with more Junker Queen
I think for Zarya there was a thought of 'hey, we're trying to make a varied cast representing how anyone can be a hero' and that bled over somewhat to being encouraged to do female characters outside strict beauty standards kinda-sorta. Like, she's buff, has some arm bulk, and tall. It's really not radical.
That said I think she articulates her character fantasy well. She's a heavy weapons soldier. Her outfit does a balance of showing off her physical power (bared arms) and her more armored legs and torso. Her hair being short speaks to a practicality and physicality in both elements of her background (weightlifter and soldier), and the weapon does a great job of being futuristic, militaristic, and clearly super heavy - she's pratically wielding a mecha's arm. Her scar, while aesthetic and carefully not marring her attractiveness, also gives her this scrappier, tougher feeling.
The dyed hair specifically I think does several things, but isn't about articulating a social agenda. I think in part it's to show a flair of indivuality (similar to her shoulder tattoo), a sort of thing to say she's standing out from the crowd in a way, helping allude to her celebrity, quasi-propogandistic element in the army. It also helps defy the western expectation that stereotypes Russians as being dour, grim, and cartoonishly pragmatic - here's a splash of the colorful, the impractical. That eye-catching nature also speaks to her role as like, someone who is taking on attention to protect others. That's in her narrative, and that's in her gameplay, and the visuals reflect that too. It's also probably a way to have her step out of the shadow of the invariable TF2 Heavy comparison, who is also big russian with a huge underhand weapon. It also also probably is just a good color complement to the blue that dominate her outfit.
Her visuals are not about strict adherence to a clear archetype (though some elements are archetypical), but they do sell her character well in many ways.
1st paragraph of your response:
I didn't accuse Zarya of being a radical departure from beauty standards. My problem is that the design is in SERVICE of defying traditional norms for women generally. Rosie the Riveter is literal propaganda. My complaint is not even that I disagree with it, it's that propaganda =/= art because it's too soulless. Zarya's superficial resemblance hurts her design. It's not 'constructive', it's 'deconstructive'. Deconstructive = boring, because it piggy-backs the concept it's subverting instead of being original. I will reference this point later.
2nd paragraph:
This is just standard tank design language. There's not necessarily a problem with this, as long as it's not the only constructive detail.... but it is. Scars, tattoos, big build, massive weapon. All par for the course for a tank. If the only thing unique about her is deconstructive it's a bad design.
3rd paragraph:
'...flair of individuality...'; '...celebrity quasi-propagandistic element...'; '...defy the western expectation...'. And you're argument is that this ISN'T about a social agenda? Not making a great case. Heavy from TF2 is a great comparison because he's the archetypal tank, and has a very boring design. The only elements that make Zarya 'step out of the shadow' are deconstructive, as I've said.
HOW THIS ALL TIES BACK INTO SUPERVIVE:
You, MisterSixtyFour, and Miles to a lesser extent all have the same theme to your argument. You all seem to want more deconstructive design elements in Supervive's characters. The problem is that by creating characters that are meant to defy IRL social norms, they become conceptually linked to those very same norms. Supervive female characters ARE samey and adhere to IRL social norms. That's true. But what makes them good is that they are also constructive. It really seems like the devs did what they should, which is ignore IRL norms altogether.
TL;DR
- Deconstructive designs are bad
- Constructive designs are good
- Supervive female characters ARE samey
- It doesn't matter because they're constructive
- Please stop asking for deconstructive designs. Go (way) too far and you become Concord.
holy based
Wait, do you seriously think expressing a female form to strict beauty standards is pure art, and that art must be apolitical to have 'soul'? Like the notion that going against the grain of beauty standards is soulless politicking and therefore deconstructive and therefore bad, but slavish adherence to a beauty standard to fulfill a marketing quota is just art and constructive and therefore good and soulful and not political, is so wildly unfounded in any theory of art.
Hell, it seems like you're saying any art which defies expectations of the canon is deconstructive, making... all modernist or postmodernist or subcultural or non Western art all bad art. It's the logic that makes regimes declare halls of art 'degenerate' for being the wrong style or wrong form or wrong politics.
The constructive vs. deconstructive line seems to be "is purely playing to expectations or upholding social norms", which is as a standard is arbitrary, soulless, and itself, propagandistic.
I'm just confused about what constitutes "Deconstructive" art and why it's a bad thing? One of the biggest hit Anime in the last 15 years was One Punch Man, a deconstruction of the superhero and shonen genre that has soul abounding from within
THIS IS A REPLY TO PETE:
To your first question: no. I'm saying adherence to beauty standards is irrelevant and that good character designs are agnostic to this.
Character designs COULD in theory be deconstructive in some ways and still be good if they are also constructive in other ways. It's just in practice you never see this. Pretty hard to 'build' and 'destroy' at the same time. When a designer goes out of their way to be deconstructive, they miss out on opportunities to be constructive.
Modernist art can still be constructive if it's incidentally modernist. That's fine. Postmodern art is unironically garbage. Just because certain evil Germans had those halls of bad art doesn't make the bad art better (also I would appreciate not being compared to them implicitly, thank you).
Dw I gotchu I know you were typing that well before my message was sent
Because anime narratives are more broad than character designs in terms of what they can accomplish. One Punch Man being deconstructive of superheroes doesn't hurt the enjoyment because it's also got a full constructive narrative of its own, which is what people that I talk to seem to actually appreciate
Great characters generally
No opportunity cost for being deconstructive like there is with character designs
I'm was just saying the logic of constructive vs. deconstructive, and the logic of politics that are not strictly conservative to the values of the canon and society are pernicious and anti-art, and the selection of what deconstructive elements are acceptable and what are not follows the logic practiced by censorious regimes.
I have a critique of the social agenda part of your response if I can have a sec to type it out
Are perceived social agendas or politics in art not entirely dictated by the person viewing the art? If you see it that way but another does not, does thay invalidate the design for them because it is invalid for you?
I think a design like Zarya spoke as political activism through design for some, but spoke more as a design itself for others
Canon provides a 'jumping off' point from which original designs can and should vary. Canon is the trunk of the 'tree'. Deconstruction is when you dispense with the tree altogether, prune the branches, try to cut it down, or claim that the soil is as good as the root. Postmodernism is the most soulless anti-art I've ever seen. It devolves into stream-of-consciousness built of nothing.
one punch man is good
Like there is definitely artist intention in what the given piece conveys. But at the same time everything is political to someone. I think everyone likes politics in art, just not when it's the politics they don't want to see which is super valid.
To your question, 100%. It's all subjective. The common mistake is thinking that makes it any less legitimate.
depends. modern art is often labeled art purely because of what the artist is projecting onto it
but im talking about bad art
and i dont count bad art as art
and also art isnt subjective its up to pair of nuts
and no one else
That's the spirit. Unironically good take said ironically smh
Idk man, I think Vonnegut's pretty art personally.
I needed this today I am so stressed lmao. Thanks for making me chuckle
Isn't this view of post-modernist art the same part of the cycle that happens every time a new style becomes culturally relevant?
I'll need to brush up on definitions to make sure I'm sure what I'm talking about before continuing this convo. Unsure if I'll have time I am at work
Please don't listen to my yapping. Please just focus on work. No one should get canned over wasting time on discord
Nah dw I have a lot of free time. We're appointment based and I'm caught up on upkeep
The next hour or two is either we get a walk in or I twiddle my thumbs watching youtube
Absolutely. New styles are usually more deconstructive than previous ones, and therefore worse, except that what redeems them is that usually new things can be made from the pieces of what came before. You can only destroy so much of the canon though before there's nothing left to work with, if that makes sense. There's nothing more destructive that comes after postmodernism, because postmodernism has no meta-narrative to destroy.
Anyways postmodernism is getting really old. The sooner we can start building new meta-narratives the better, even if they're just recycled.
Supervive has almost perfect representation among female characters. We have overboob with Eva, Underboob with Mercury, now all we need is sideboob and all angles will be represented lol
My argument is essentially: embrace norms and deviation, reject deconstruction
Idk that feels like eating spaghetti with different sauces everyday. It might be good but it's still just noodles
I personally enjoy mold breaking art
And I think that - including post-modernism - push art forward as a whole
Forward towards what?
I think it's more like eating Japanese cuisine everyday... which once upon a time is exactly what the Japanese people would do. Nothing wrong with that...
Toward something new, something exciting. Pushing the standard of any medium forward is always a messy process with lots of misses and failures along the way. But the incremental successes add up
Take cgi for example. It was always good and interesting in its own regard, but through decades of trials, successes, and failures it's been driven to capabilities no one could have dreamed of in the 80's
You can apply virtually every innovation to this method, including art. Things will be bad before they get better. But even through that a diamond might strike out and put everything else to shame (Spiderverse, Mob Psycho, Fallout: New Vegas, etc)
I just think stagnation and norm adherence is the death of creativity overall.
But then it's bad to eat multiple cuisines, or try someone doing a weird new twist on cuisine? How... how do you think we established cuisines in the first place? Like, you're couching this in terminology that sounds like theory, and the subjective opinion of 'I like the classics' is fine or whatever, but you're ultimately applying this to say having female character designs outside a narrow beauty standard is unartistic because it forwards a social agenda (that is 'women are people that can be cool in more ways the being conventionally hot, and it would be cool to get characters who reflect that variety'), and that maintaining the same body type is good because it works within a canon (in this case, the canon of video games only making women look one way to appeal to x beauty standard for the conventional wisdom of it sells good).
Like, you can have a subjective opinion, but if we're regarding all innovation as suspect, all 'politics' as anti-art, and anything that critiques the canon it's within as nihilistic slop that is unable to make its own tradition, we're risking embracing a lens of guys on twitter really mad we're not making marble statues in the greek style.
I mean hell some of the generally considered greatest artists of all time created art that was considered trash during their era
Wait my point about great artists has a glaring flaw
I rescind it
It's not at all bad to deviate. I eat sushi all the time and none of it is 'classic' except maybe the California Roll (which itself isn't ''''''pure'''''' sushi, but pure sushi isn't real). I'm advocating that Supervive's female character designs should transcend norms by variation, not discard them. It doesn't even matter that the norm in question is 'female beauty standards'. We don't have to go back to the Flappers of the 20s with women having pencil-thin physiques. There's no value to adhering to modern beauty standards specifically besides adherence itself.
Innovation isn't suspect, deconstruction is just not a valid way to achieve it. Politics isn't anti-art, it's the deconstruction that's anti-art.
The problem with the angry twitter men mad about sculptures is that they have nothing to offer besides their opposition to what they hate. That's deconstruction as well.
At the risk of opening a can of worms, I'm pulling ideas from Nietzsche
Always a dicey move
Nothing wrong with reading or finding meaning in Nietzsche's words
I know he just had his reputation ruined by charlatans
Though I can see how some folks would latch on to that negatively
I wasn't being down on Nietzsche. Just agreeing with bart's half joke that it's a can of worms to bring him up
Yeah I was responding directly to him dw
All it takes is 1 fascist government to ruin a philosopher's reputation smh my head
all jokes ofc
I just want functional institutions, rich cultural traditions, and a busty woman with a 5 ton hammer in my live-service vidya game lmao
Mostly just the last one
God help any dev or mod trying to read this. My heart goes out to you
I think the line of deconstruction vs. deviation is what is baffling me then. I don't see Zarya as pure, nihilistic deconstruction. She fits many tropes of a protective tank figure, has a few innovations, and has a clear narrative within the canon. The celebrity athlete that sacrifices her career to fight the good fight. She's basically Russian Pat Tillman. You can not like her, but she's not pure dada.
Similarly, I don't think looking for more variety is deconstructive as you define it. It's not about constantly and thoughtlessly defying a beauty standard, but rather conspiciously allowing female characters to tell the story of their character better through their visuals, and that those stories can be just as varied as those of male characters. If saying women can be as many types of characters as men is destroying our canon, then our canon is a weak baby canon that deserves to get bodied.
That's not saying we can never have hot women. Just that if editorial fiat demands we make all women the same seeking the same sort of appeal, it's less artistically interesting, worse character articulation, and also sends a weird social message (one I would call a far more anti-art thing than whatever editorials helped make Zarya). Not saying TC is purely doing that, just I hope they get the space to express the creativity they clearly possess for all characters, in a way they have not in the past seemed entirely free to.
curious what the flaw was to your underappreciated artist bit
I guess I hadn't really thought of Zarya in that light. I might have been unfair. Maybe my view of Zarya is tainted by characters that share those deviating traits who are just mindlessly deconstructive.
Your second paragraph is almost spot on. Telling story through visuals is kino. All I would say is that if you completely depart from norms associated with human appearance, it no longer matters what the gender is. Oath and Kingpin being male or male-coded doesn't matter very much. Maybe a little. We don't need to dispense with modern notions of what's physically attractive in female or male characters to get sufficient variation. All humans male or female in Supervive are broadly attractive, except maybe Hudson, and that's really not holding the game back from getting a female Kingpin or Oath.
Add a female or male Reksai clone, doesn't matter
There's no unfairness there
It's just better if there's some root-idea holding things together
The flaw was that we are talking about successful art in our immediate time. The artists mentioned were famously hated/unappreciated during their time
Also unironically the most productive conversation had in this thread up until this point
Thanks for being good sports you two
Crazy what can happen when we're not immediately aggressive lol
To add to this I think the unappreciated artist bit is cohesive to the discussion on pushing the medium forward, just not as applicable to immediately successful designs
i redownloaded deadlock and HOLY this roster is oozing in variety and personality
yes they also have sexy bad bitches dont start with that
JUMPSCARE
obsessed with this queens crouch

I do like the variety there. It's not like there aren't attractive characters on the cast - gheist and mina have that, and it's central to their design. Then they got the adorably earnest garghoyle vigilante and that snake dirtbag (though her model is temp and will probably end up more snakey - there's a wip running around, though I don't think it'll be any more attractive).
supervive wouldve made her have an underboob dfSAKJFSD
It's an even distribution system. The release was 1/3 a velma expy and a mean girl in thigh highs for the dudes, 1/3 a shirtless byronic sad boi and sadistic eldritch being with posh manners for the ladies, and then 1/3 a beligerant goat man with rancid vibes and a matt mercer doing a hilarious cajun accent as a literal murder hobo for the freaks. Something, something, sex sells.
wait they already have a bigger roster than supervive 1.0.... 
im the freaks matt mercer has a godly voice
I mean they may have supervive beat in dev time, even counting all the closed alphas of project Loki. It went through like two different thematic overhauls. And again, benefits of sitting on an infinite pile of money
Wouldn't say it's fair to compare valve to TC
Yes, comparing a young company with a single game against VALVE, the company that produced 5 billion dollars in 2023 with a sales platform focused on video games and with more than 1 popular game, sounds a little unfair.
Who should we compare TC to? I feel any comparison would be unfair to TC
like hydrogen bomb vs coughing baby
i actually dislike most of the deadlock characters
i dont like the mafia vibe at all
but thats just me not them
marvel rivals has infinite characters to pick from but they can never make a character cooler than lash
The dude who lead development for dota 1 and dota 2 is the lead for deadlock he's had a lot of experience
It is set in like.. alt 1949 so that's kinda just the style. Half the cast are on placeholders too. Not saying ya gotta like it. Just contextualizing.
Wait, are there more newsboy caps than fedoras?
no i know, i played a lot before i got banned
How do you get banned in a game not even out yet 😭
Worth noting that vipers animations are so key to her character feel that literally no other body type or anything less snakey would work. Her whole character is built around co stantly sliding and slithering while gunning people down and it feels SO good to play
I can't think of a SV hunter that is that dependent on animations for their gameplay feel. Maybe Joule?
u used to be able to pause whenever
and i thought it was funny
dev said i got reported 15 games in a row for pausing as soon as the game started
but they removed it after my ban so, youre welcome everyone
Can still insta pause the game
Probably just banned for abusing it
Pauselock haha
I mean the animations are typically pretty good. Consensus on tetra's gauntlets went from finding them awkward to finding them fitting based on animation in game.
That explains why you can buy a point and click cc active item...
TRUE I forgot about her
ok that is funny actually
I'd also regard the amount of expression kp gets out his monster arm as pretty solid.
Yeah I might just be riding the high of playing viper for the first time last night and being blown away once she clicked
Building all slide distance + gun items makes her a crazy fun mobile kiter constantly slithering around
Honestly she really reminds me of the animals from Rango design wise
Just humanoid enough to help people relate
But solidly animalistic to heavily lean into her snakey qualities
I look forward to her having scales that resemble a pencil thin moustache
Yeah lmao he likes insane stuff
I'm just glad I play at an elo where no one really buys that stuff lol
defo not a game I want to get to the top end of
It's one of the few games I think has an almost infinite skill cap tbh
While we r on the subject of deadlock
Supervive needs a lash
And he needs to be in a thong
Thats my contribution to this convo
I raise you Slingkini Hudson
Thats good but is it lash good
only if his slam is an ass slam
thats what im saying
tbf i was 5 stacking and we took turns pausing
until the other team left
my winrate was 100%
@untold fox Oh hey, there's the second time Concord got mentioned.