hidden trail
I declared permissions on a group of command so that only people who have the permissions can use them. The commands are visible but unusable, but this isn't how it's supposed to work from what I gather from this GitHub issue: https://github.com/discord/discord-api-docs/issues/2355#issuecomment-2132147037
An example from a low ranked user in a discord who *does not have the ManageNicknames permission.
glossy marshBOT
hidden trail
Forgot to include this picture in the thread, but this is what the user gets if they try to use it
ancient hound
The RequireXPermissions attributes are just simple preconditions
hidden trail
This command is perfectly functional however
ancient hound
The `RequireXPermissions` attributes are just simple preconditions
they only add a runtime check for the permissions
what you probably want is DefaultMemberPermissions attribute
this one sets the base permission required to even see the command
hidden trail
Alright thanks sir 
ancient hound
this one sets the base permission required to even see the command
*unless overridden in server settings
hidden trail
@ancient hound just to confirm, I don't need the [RequiredXPermissions] thing if I have this one, right?
discordjs docs seem to confirm this
ancient hound
<@394209945513361408> just to confirm, I don't need the [RequiredXPermissions] t...
You don't need to
but sometimes you might wanna have both
for example for some moderation command
hidden trail
Right you need Kick perms for everything, but some also need Ban for example
ancient hound
You don't need to
but sometimes you might wanna have both
for example for some m...
just so a stupid server owner doesn't grant @еveryone perms to destroy the server
ancient hound
just so a stupid server owner doesn't grant @еveryone perms to destroy the serve...
and then blame the bot 
because obviously it's the bot who did it
hidden trail
🤖 
For all pratical cases, is there a single one where you would NOT want [RequireUserPermissions] to impact [DefaultMemberPermissions] ?
i.e. in what scenario would you have [RequireUserPermissions(GuildPermissions.KickMember)] but NOT the equivalent for DMP ?
(other than for easter eggs/hidden commands) wait no DMP overrides RUP if it's higher
ancient hound
For all pratical cases, is there a single one where you would NOT want [RequireU...
Where you want to explicitly let server admins to fully control the permissions for the command
hidden trail
But then you would also not have DMP, right ?
If you want a server admin to control the permissions entirely, that implies DMP as well
ancient hound
well i can't think of a good example rn
ancient hound
~~(other than for easter eggs/hidden commands)~~ wait no DMP overrides RUP if it...
it doesn't override anything really
DMP just tells the base permission to discord when u register command
while RUP/RGP does a bot side check
