#The SM situation
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
I won’t say much but Pledis was on the brink of bankruptcy when SVT debuted and they were big before Pledis was acquired. I don’t know what hybe is trying to say with this infographic but 
It’s basically Hybe trying to lie and make themselves look better even though they don’t need to really try that hard cause people know groups under Hybe’s success but not because of Hybe necessarily
It is giving “they made themselves super successful but I bought their company so imma say it’s my company’s achievement. Yay me”
As much as I dislike Hybe getting involved with SME, I kinda hope it will somehow weed out some of the SME management BS that gone on. Like we all know that the all kpop companies do shady/underhanded things, but what I'm hoping is that all this attention/drama will somehow end up helping make the industry as a whole be forced to make some changes. I'm not holding my breath, but a girl can hope.
Yee changes def need to happen
In the end I think SME and Hybe should be separated for ALOT of reasons. But also I still hate Kakao and want them to go FAR away (I'm still salty about the spotify thing)
Took out like half my playlist
Hmm... As much as I will side eye hybe for making it seem like they were the reason for making them bigger... The statement is not kind of false tho... If the word regional here means east/south east asia then there are not incorrect
Like they started charting in billboard Japan from 'clap'
But they don't chart the billboard global, billboard 200, billboard excluding US, billboard canada and Germany, digital song sales before 'ready to love' was released
I could be proven wrong from world albums and world digital songs charts.... But even loona cover of sistar "shake it" has top the charts
So as a carat myself i don't get the insulting part about it really... As they are one of the biggest group in k-pop with the greatest catalogue of music
Seventeen was already successful and global stars before Hybe they even had a million dollar selling album before Hybe acquired pledis like Hybe doesnt get to take credit for Seventeen’s success
Yeah hybe definitely can't take credit for that...let me set that straight... If we are talking about the sentence then... everyone has different metrics to judge someones popularity... For some it could be tiktok or twitter... For me it's charts and the range of online impressions in different regions, countries and ages
Anyways let me change it back to the topic... Hybe and Kakao needs to leave sm alone...sm really don't need any of them to be bigger
If it goes towards kakao... Sm could potentially be used as a cashcow for kakao for their own ventures... Most likely the artists may not get any say over their music and concepts and they could make them work harder for more output
Whereas if it goes to hybe... They will definitely takeover the company... They may tell that they don't have a say in other labels but I'm not believing that after nuest and gfriend. They most likely will disband the older groups without even questioning it...and the sm concept will definitely get muddled by hybe
Companies get money from fans but the majority comes from investors and shareholders.
But that’s not sustainable? The point of making a business is to get sustainable income to generate profit. Money from investors are not profit.
yeah
investors and shareholders are important to the business of a company, but the consumer is the most important part of the structure itself because without them there would be no profit or revenue for the company, its employees, investors and shareholders
consumer profit is the main priority to businesses and that does include investors and shareholders. Without a stable consumer profit, a business loses everything and shareholders will back off from continuing their support for the company
Money from investors is important as money from customers as without it you can can't expand.
Consumers are an important stakeholder but they are are not the only one, employees, investors and shareholders all have to be considered in any decision.
Yes but consumers are your main market. Without consumers, without customers, you have nothing to stand on
You can’t have your cake and eat it too
Consumers are important but businesses start from capital be it from personal investment or from a bank. Your right in saying customers are important but investment is also important as you do anything without the means of making businesses.
The business won’t matter if there is no profit thou. I’m not saying that investment and shareholders aren’t important but it wont matter in the end if there is no consumers/customers, the most vital part for a company to survives either than employees
Investors invest because they see a possible profit, shareholders buy shareholdings because they too see a possible profit
But it is the case of the chicken chicken and the egg. You can not have one without the other. Investment is important to companies but so is customers, both provide income for companies and allow survival and growth. Now say if its a co operative the relationship is slightly different
But that’s only because there’s a market for it with customers
If there is no profit, no customers, then these investors and shareholders will pull out
In the sense you have greater customer and employee involvement
CUSTOMERS and EMPLOYEES are important to the business
They are the reason the business/company exist and is still standing
Again without them there would be no investors and shareholders
This isn’t an opinion it’s a well known fact in business
No customers equal no profit
Only in co operatives where they have s direct stake
In the business such as with waitrose
I agree but that doesn't mean that there important for all businesses
As if you set labour at the right level
And the conditions are set right people have not choice on where they work
Factor in globalisation
The reason it’s one of the leading retailers in groceries in the UK is because of its speedy checkout process
And you have a utterly replaceable workforce because you set up where it is cheapest
And pay as little as possible
It is but its mostly importantly different to other businesses
As when the company has a good year the workers get a bonus
If where going by checkout speed lidle is one if not the most speedy
It’s a business where people buy things, it’s a business in which got popular because people liked what they were doing because of their staff, it’s a business that because of its popularity could have gotten more investors and shareholders. Everything is connected and one should not be undermined for the other but you should also acknowledge the power a consumer has over a businesses life cycle
And even then at the end of the day, profit is the main goal. Profit given by customers
Why did you think I mentioned stakeholders
All thing must be balanced for stability
And for cost benefit analysis
Not when you undermine the power that the consumers have. Not when you ignore that business relies on the consumer to buy their product. I never disagreed that investors and shareholders didn’t play a big role in business, what I’m saying is that employees and consumers especially are the businesses life blood. There is no argument about that
No matter how you want to reiterate it, profit is a business’s end goal. Consumers are the reason a business survives in the first place
Without profit there is no business, no investors or shareholders
This is not an opinion nor theory but a fact in business
Consumers matters
No matter how much you want to argue about it, this is the truth
Consumerism is an extention of globalisation and I would say Consumerisms importance varies with the cost of items in question. The world of high inflation and stagflation puts the reach of Consumerism rather shorter than its original birth in the sixties.
This has been a very Interesting thought provoking discussion 😊
I didn’t even mention the fact that small business don’t have the privilege of having investors nor shareholders but the reason they survive is because of customers who like what they do and always come back
Reiterating again that consumers matter way more than investors and shareholders
Yes and no, investment can come from oneself or from banks as long as they have a scheme for small businesses
Do you just mean making a business from your own hard work and money and then gaining profit from said business with the help of customers
What drives drives consumerism then? The drive for profit which goes between re investment, shareholders and investors.
No I mean putting your own money into a business.
If you’re talking about my autocorrection then that’s the only time consumerism is brought up, but consumerism is the protection or promotion of the interests of consumers. The growth of consumerism has led to many organizations improving their service to the customer
The drive and growth of consumerism can be attributed to politics and economics, not investors and shareholders
So making your own business with your own money by investing in said business which will then lead to a possible profit from said customers to make that self investment worth it and to pay it out if you got a loan for said business
Yes
Then the customer/consumer still matters in this situation because without them your investment is in vain and you will go bankrupt and in debt without a large turnout
Investors and shareholders wont matter if there is no stable profit from consumers
You can exclude the finalisation of the global economy as a reason for the increasing importance of shareholders, investors and stakeholders.
You mean consumers, cause again, without them the shareholders, investors and stakeholders will be for nothing and won’t matter in the end
But to put a cat between the pigeons what about utilities?
Without consumers, there is no business for an investor to invest in, for a shareholder to having holdings in, for a stakeholder to have stakes in
I will continue this later after work
I’m just gonna end this conversation because at this point I’m repeating myself over and over again because you can’t understand the fact that a business’s main goal is to make a profit which they get form consumers/customers. And if they don’t get said profit, it won’t matter if they have investors, shareholders or stakeholders, because the company will be defunct because there is no money and the investors/shareholders/stakeholders will pull out or try to sell their shares for as much as they can get them because their is no money coming out do the business
Without consumers, there is no business. They are the most important part of a business’ life cycle either than employees
Yes you can. The point of a business is to get way more than your initial business model and investment to the point where it basically becomes a money making machine without the help of any other investors. Why? Because you are your own investor at that point.
No.. That’s IF said business goes public. If it’s a private business then they don’t have share and stake holders
I mean.. Ofc initial investments are important but without income rolling in from what you’re selling, you’ll run out of business in no time. Just take an example from most startups
Yes
Wdym? The point of doing and starting a business IS to sell to customers and or clients. Otherwise, what is a business for? Lol
But think abt it this way @cursive furnace : If you are in investor in a company. And said company is not making any turnovers in like 3-4 years time. Why would you waste and burn money in said company when you can invest your money in another company that will have a faster turnover rate?
I’m sorry but…are you really trying to argue that consumers aren’t important in K-pop…? I’m starting to think you’re ignoring common sense because you just want to win an argument 
There is no need to bring up other examples of businesses like supermarkets, that’s completely irrelevant to this discussion. We are talking about K-pop, specifically K-pop companies, and it’s obvious that they can’t operate without profit from the consumers who buy albums, stream, etc…
Sure, investors and stakeholders are important but what’s the point in running a business if you can’t make profit? 
Anyways I think we should end that topic here because I don’t want us to derail from the main topic of the thread. 
Tbh I was thinking the same thing when they kept ignoring my explanations by either diverting the conversation or bringing up unrelated topics
SM created a website
The tweet to show It is SM https://twitter.com/smtownglobal/status/1632622178293383169?s=46&t=r_Qpa2wXhIH4MOi8RUAikA
SM 3.0 웹사이트 - Save SM 3.0
팬과 주주, 임직원을 위한 SM 3.0 프로젝트
SM 3.0 Website - Save SM 3.0
SM 3.0 Project for Fans, Shareholders, and Employees
#SMentertainment #SMTOWN
1877
951
Although right now there doesn’t seem to be it in English (unless I’m missing it)
"save sm"
please-
next thing you know it's gonna be a gofundme
these incidents so far are just the rich dragging the poor and middle class into their game, and those groups of people know nothing
K-pop powerhouse Hybe’s initial plan to gain stable management control over rival company SM Entertainment by buying more shares through a tender offer fall through. On Feb. 10, Hybe announced a tender offer for SM Entertainment’s shares held by minority shareholders. It offered 120,000 won ($92.60) per share with a goal to additionally secure u...
to summarize these articles, hybe was only able to attain another .98% of SM's shares. a lot less than they hoped for.
they were hoping to get another 25%
i wouldn't go that far, i think there are a lot of people poor, middle class or not that have a good understanding of how businesses work
This is.. good?
but really both sides want people on their side, seeking to give them a voice
so they're basically lulling people in with such apocalyptic statements that they'll take in their sides
well, newsflash for them, not everyone knows wall street-level finances and economics
and I just so happen to fit into the category that has no knowledge of economics
people honestly just make a big deal out of this...
i dont think its a good idea to drag a persons knowledge based off their social status...
i understand, i just think it was a stretch to generalize the poor and middle class and essentially call them clueless.
oh, my bad
you can know more about business as a middle/lower class person compared to a higher class person
my apologies
it's just that it's an issue that I really tire of hearing and I know nothing about it...just wanted to vent for a while
its alright not to know like even i dont understand half of the situation but lets try to prevent generalizations like this in the future :)
Kakao "SM Ent. tender offer for 150,000 won"
Kakao launched a counterattack to acquire management rights of SM Ent. They took out a tender offer card higher price than HYBE n plans to buy up to 35% of general shareholder shares at 150,000 won per share. https://t.co/eEJVqqS5za
151
102
the girls are fighting
the girls are do fighting
Sigh
Popcorn time
Kakao Outbids HYBE With New Tender Offer To SM Stockholders In Attempt To Secure 35 Percent Share
https://t.co/96Go5ZREb2
4177
397
We got a bid war going
Have you seen what the shareholders said
"Unlike HYBE, Kakao respects us," 26 SM Entertainment executives are in favor of Kakao's tender offer https://t.co/g8A6X7kRL0
1661
198
There is a lot behind the scenes we dont know apparently
inchresting
A breaking exclusive from Chosun: Kakao and Hybe have come to an agreement regarding SM. The details have not been revealed but the rumor is that neither will monopolize SM. Supposedly the deal will be announced soon
379
149
oop
The resting is inner but let’s see what happens next
Halleluya
Praise God Jihyo 🙏
idk what this means in the end but best outcome so far ig
No comment on that
...Sus 
Plot twist: SM monopolize Hybe and Kakao M 🗿
Just like that? After spending so much? I don't like this 
theres gotta be a catch...
Right 
like we did not just witness a week or 2 of hybe going insane over sm shares...
theres gotta be smth behind 
Mhm but eh we'll see
The future of SM is unknown. Music critic Kim Doheon gave a lengthy interview prior to the Hybe/Kakao agreement and said that no matter who takes over, SM Ent colors will change since the driving force behind their concepts was Lee Sooman.
1012
355
For instance, LSM was the one behind the infinite expansion of NCT and once Chris Lee took over, he immediately terminated that concept. NCT Toyko will be the last. The same with Kwangya. That was LSM's idea and it is unknown whether that will continue under new mgmt
350
135
I TOLD E.V.E.R.Y.O.N.E. LSM WAS THE REASON
I FEEL DUMBLY VALIDATED
WHY IS SME AT THE forefront of concepts? LSM. Why was SME creative, pushing boundaries? LSM.
Anyway--- not all the artists like it, that's fine, but gdi.
But that does mean LSM has failed tho right?
He was the one that initiated the HYBE deal
Ofc.. It’s HIS company that he founded
He already made the deal, meaning: He no longer holds a share in SM. Meaning: he officially doesn’t own any of the company
So he’s just a rich businessman that once owned SM now
Unlike JYP where JYP still owns a portion of JYPE
LSM still has shares I think. in 2022 he had about 18% and HYBE bought 14%
Really?
Yeah he’s still a shareholder in SM, he just isn’t the largest shareholder anymore
Ohh I see. But well, he still can't have the same influence as he did before. He's a minor share holder now.
Didn't he sell all his shares and the 14 come from elsewhere 🤔 I I'm kind of lost by now on event's
no, he still has 4% shares left and is still a shareholder
HYBE bought 14%
Oh thanks for the information ☺️
LSM didn't lose persay. He wanted to stop Kakao from taking over and he did

[Reply to:](#1073404857605701702 message) LSM didn't lose persay. He wanted to stop Kakao from taking over and he did
now...

Some people on Twitter are saying they are just offering to sell and havnt sold yet so I dunno for sure so maybe take the article with a grain of salt
I

So it was all for nothing then?
so much happened and yet nothing happened at the same time
exactly
Wait whaat?
Some people are saying that hybe got 100 million from the deal but I am not sure if this is correct 🤔
On 6 Apr, prosecutors raided Kakao and Kakao Ent over the allegations of market manipulation that arose during the acquisition of SM Ent. The case will be led by the Financial Investigation unit of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor's Office and the search & seizure by
845
226
the plot thickens…
The tea is scolding
the tea is on fire at this point
There is no more tea, it all evaporated
Chapter 10 of this saga I guess? Not sure
.disappointed
all men do is lie /hj
As a man i agree 😔
Lmao
What in the hippity hoppity is happening
Lord what is going on now...
It may or may not fully be related anymore but Lee Soo Man is apparently selling his shares to HYBE https://x.com/kchartsmaster/status/1763039033901367334?s=46&t=r_Qpa2wXhIH4MOi8RUAikA
Didnt he already do that and they sold them back to sm im confused he still had shares in sm??
He still had like 3% or something
but IDK if they sold the shares to SM or cancelled the bid.
Update cause it was discussed about HYBE having SM shares here before but https://x.com/kchartsmaster/status/1927282242528624741?s=46&t=r_Qpa2wXhIH4MOi8RUAikA



