#Precision Fuzz
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
How's the shielding? I would be inclined to paint the interior with carbon paint
I've never had an issue with shielding in my printed enclosures. On one of them I did line it with aluminium tape but all it did as far as Arta was concerned was remove a slight 50Hz hum
"all" it did was remove all of the 50 hz hum?
Well the hum wasn't audible, just measurable. But it's not like I get much other EMI here
I've not picked up a radio station yet
Fair enough
But at the same time, if it does become an issue I have a bunch of aluminium tape I can use
nice. better manhattan than p2p by far
The construction is clean
is it time for the rule?
If there's no sound clips, it hasn't happened.
What, do you presume that yeti’s sounds differently broken than yours somehow? 😆
🤔 Though considering novel variations of the 431 fuzz … I wonder if it would sound any different to vary the bias current
Since the 431 holds a constant cathode voltage
Or anode I should say
Do you want a demo with amp + cab sim or without?
well, there's a different user and different surrounding ⚙️
former please
why two, i'm scare
One with just cab sim, one with amp and cab sim
This is fair; my snark is unwarranted
do it anyway
wow, even two different takes
Is the same audio for both
ok, then the second sounds less broken, maybe it's the copious reverb
good though, for a fuzz
There's delay on there too, the preset was called "Clean Every Sunday"
so clean
This one doesn't sound appreciably different between my single coils and humbucker which is interesting
it's past the critical point
it's worth mentioning that it cleans up just like a fuzz face
Yeah but I’m snarking because I’m in a mood and not because it’s funny so
I would be interested in how the precision fuzz sounds with a load resistor switch and a buffer
it's always funny! for me at least
collector load?
I don’t believe it isn’t but its for me it’s about intent
And yes, “collector” load
i have a demo for input buffer in/out, even if it's not your usual one
What I’m interested in is specifically how different collector currents would sound, the buffering would be just for output impedance
oh that one is good enough that it doesn't matter
for collector current, you'd need to separate the effect from bias voltage. for a ground down emitter we know what's left isn't voltage gain but input impedance change, for this i don't know but i don't think it's much
And the TL431 holds its bias voltage constant
https://soundcloud.com/discover/sets/track-stations:1147057138
"bonus" ac buffer is the normal one not shown
it tries to at least
It’s also internally more complex than a transistor, after all
Probably the broken sound it exhibits is that you’re basically shutting the power off to an op amp every half cycle 😆
be TL431
pull my own collector voltage down to 0 volts
.
that's fuzz for you
Fundamentally, maybe yeah
If we say fuzz “is” blocking distortion, well; this is a form of blocking
I don't think all fuzz is blocking distortion
let's discuss then
My 386er fuzzes but I discovered that the fuzz on that is just the chip oscillating wildly and interacting with the incoming signal poorly
I would assert that the sound of fuzz is the sound of blocking distortion, but you can produce the sound of blocking distortion separately from the phenomenon
Oh no I would just call that blocking distortion
"oscillating wildly" counts as "blocking" just as well as flatlining does
Maybe I don't know what blocking distortion is
in either case the bass components have completely overwhelmed the treble
when I say blocking distortion, I mean, "when an amplifier has been overdriven to the point that a small change in the input signal yields no meaningful change in the output"
or in other words, "the effective gain of the amplifier is zero, for however short of a time"
and I guess "wildly oscillating" counts as "zero gain" for me because it's unrelated to the input signal
Hmm so the 386 fuzz either sounds "fuzzy", perfectly clean, or the output cuts out. All depending on how hard you play
And all the time it's oscillating at above audio rates
many fuzzes are known to clean up
there is no circuit which is inherently fuzz, fuzz is something a circuit does
I agree with that
and there are circuits which are particularly conducive to fuzzing which we call fuzzes
lol pedal philosophy
I guess the difference with my one is clean and fuzz can be a matter of playing on one string vs the other at the same volume
which is no problem because fuzz is a phenomenon
this means what makes a circuit a fuzz or not, as well, is whether how you use it is conducive to making it fuzz
so, your 386 drive both is a fuzz for one string, and it isn't a fuzz for another string
but it might be a fuzz for the other string, if you just played louder
Oh it certainly is
🤔 I feel like this "a fuzz pedal is a pedal that's fuzzing" philosophy carries over well to guitar effects in general
too often we try to speak of some essence of a circuit but circuits don't have an essense
however the big muff will never be a fuzz
It does get fuzzy though if you crank it and boost into it
okay I can believe a muff will fuzz if you play humbuckers into it
we no longer have to say a big muff is a fuzz or it isn't a fuzz
we simply ask when it fuzzes
and if it is capable it is a fuzz
the theory of fuzz
Fuzznomenology
Fuck it this build is convincing me I should try to use the new big boi 3D printer at my work to make an enclosure heh.. our old ones were small and bad monoprice models which couldn’t handle it but our new one has a big bed
have you designed the case model yourself?
oh, thanks, i might do some edits and try it out
what program did you use?
for the modelling that is, im running into issues on translating the file to onshape
I used onshape
could be that im using the wrong measurement unit, what did you use?
Mm