#tpak-ach-oauth

1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

mental sentinel
#

You would only use the new ACH for new ACH payment methods. You would just continue using the old API for the ACH payment methods that are already verified.

#

It doesn't have any effect on the ACH payment methods that are already created

late iris
#

so you will support the old API forever?

#

because that would mean i need to use the old API to charge for customers authorized under the old API

mental sentinel
# late iris so you will support the old API forever?

I can't really say. Most users create the upgraded integration entirely separate from their current integration, then gradually bring their customers back onto the bank authentication flow in order to migrate them to the newest version over time

late iris
#

hm

#

we're doing a new flow and we just wanted to upgrade the authorization portion - what you are saying means I'd have a split and need to record what integration I used or force (or eventuallt force) existing customers to re-authorize

#

not very friendly to existing customers

#

So you don't really have an upgrade path is what I understand - authoriuzations are API version specific - are CC also that way?

silk bluff
#

Hi ๐Ÿ‘‹ I'm stepping in as @mental sentinel needs to leave.

late iris
#

ok

#

hi

silk bluff
late iris
#

this makes me grumpy

silk bluff
#

Understandably so.

late iris
#

why did you make it this way?

#

i will LOSE customers

#

i can move to another provider just as easily as implementing this

silk bluff
#

I didn't. But there are trade-offs with every choice and I was not privy to the discussions regarding the implementation of ACH as a Payment Method.

late iris
#

so, previously I have created customers in Strip, and I have used Plaid or your bank accounts api to do microdeposit confirmations, the accounts are attached to the customers in Stripe.

silk bluff
#

But there are ways to work around it and we can offer support to help you achieve those. So when you say you wanted to upgrade the authorization flow, what do you mean?

late iris
#

I just have to re-get authorization to charge them - AKA 'intent' ??

#

"If you previously collected an online mandate from the customer, you might have a timestamp, an IP address, or user agent information for them. You can use that information to create a mandate object.
If you previously collected payment and mandate information offline (on the phone or in person), you can create a mandate with offline acceptance."

#

is this the workaround?

silk bluff
#

You don't have to charge them. The SetupIntent object allows you to capture the authorizations required to correctly set up a payment method without charging the individual. It will require bringing the user on-session though.

#

And yes there is that approach as well. Creating the mandates yourself.

late iris
#

but all of my users already authorized me to charge them each month

silk bluff
#

Okay, so that sounds like the mandate creation approach is what makes more sense.

late iris
#

re: "you say you wanted to upgrade the authorization flow, what do you mean?" -- we are revising our UI/UX and checkout and we were going to do away with Plaid and get on the new API - but we already have customers we charge every month - didn't recognize I was going to need to gut and re-write the other parts of my platform that do the charging as well

silk bluff
#

However, both you and your customers have to be aware that those banks can request re-authorization of those accounts at any time for any reason they chose

#

didn't recognize I was going to need to gut and re-write the other parts of my platform that do the charging as well
What parts are you talking about here?

late iris
#

the part that does the charging each month

#

i just call your api with customer id and amount and it charges the method on file

#

you are saying or your coworker said I need to re-write that to the new api as well and split horizon existing customers to the old charging api and new ones auth'd though this new mechanism to the new charging api

silk bluff
#

Which API endpoint do you charge?

late iris
#

hold obn

silk bluff
#

And you said these are recurring charges. Are you using Stripe subscriptions?

late iris
#

POST /v1/charges

#

no

#

I said that in my opening query

#

these are not "subscriptions" per se - they are monthly charges for professional services type of thing

#

and our ACH charges are $2k - $65k per customer per month - some on ACH some on CC

silk bluff
#

And, in you testing of the new integration, you are having to modify your API call to /v1/charges?

late iris
#

I'm not that far yet. your colleague said I would have to

#

" You would just continue using the old API for the ACH payment methods that are already verified."

#

that implies some new API

#

" Most users create the upgraded integration entirely separate from their current integration, then gradually bring their customers back onto the bank authentication flow in order to migrate them to the newest version over time"

#

Maybe their answer is wrong, not clear, or I misunderstand them

silk bluff
#

No my colleague was correct. Payment Methods created using the new API are generally managed separately.

#

But as far as using for the default source on a Customer, that part should be pretty straight forward

late iris
#

so, I need a split system then if I upgrade to the new ACH authorization API

#

what????

#

now you are making no sense

#

I have payment methods on fiule for my customers

#

/v1/charges - do I need to change that - I just pass customerID into that like so

#

{
"amount": "315001",
"currency": "usd",
"customer": "cus_sjkdlhfsdkljhfkljsdhflksjhsaldkjfh",
"description": "Paying total amount of $3150.01 for xxxxxxxx"
}

#

i've obfuscated cus_ obvioulsy

#

because if I need to call a V2/charges or something then that is stupid

silk bluff
#

No

#

There ins't a v1/charges

#

not at all

#

Creating the ACH account object uses a new API

late iris
#

so charges doesnt change

silk bluff
#

But it assigns the method of payment to the customer and the charge goes through the same

late iris
#

just creating a new ACH payment account object

#

well, both you and your colleauge misunderstood my question

#

but now i do need to understand the intent thing

#

mind you I didnt do this - some really junior person that appears to have not had adult supervision at an outsourcing firm did this a long time ago

#

but, can I see "intents" in the console or do I need to use API?

#

I want to have my finance operations person confirm them for me before I try and build an upgrade path ...

#

argh, never mind that last question

#

found it

silk bluff
#
  1. SetupIntent - used to create and assign Payment Methods in a way that handles modern authentication requirements (like SCA)
  2. PaymentIntent - modern equivalent of Charges. Is able to handle retries, recover from errors, handle 3DS authentication
late iris
#

ugh

#

this project just got a bigger blast radius ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

#

Am I allowed to stay with the V1/plaid api for now and fix this mess later?

silk bluff
#

You can stay with v1/plaid and build this out in Test mode to make sure it will work for you before changing anything over

late iris
#

we can do it but this level of effort to re-write will wreck my timelines

#

this changes all kinds of stuff and is not a 1:1 swap

#

my flows all need to change

#

need new designs

#

need new error handling

#

blech

#

may as well call GoGlobal ๐Ÿ™‚

#

and recurly ... ๐Ÿ˜›

#

j/k - I'll discuss timelines with my team tomnorrow - this is going to require quitting for the night and a bottle of wine, maybe 2 bottles ๐Ÿ™‚

silk bluff
#

Well whenever you're ready we'll be here to answer more questions.

late iris
#

LOL

#

is that code for "deliver more bad news"

#

hehe

#

j/k - you are all, always helpful even if the news is not what i want

#

last question - b/c I am no Discord expert

#

will this thread live on for me to reference or do I need to save it somehow?

silk bluff
#

I suspect there is some potential ways to ease any transition but it might require more focused questions around specific workflows. I may have missed a thing or two.

#

This thread will get archived eventually but you can still refer to it and use the http link as a reference back in the main channel to discuss this topic again

late iris
#

that's pretty good lawyer speak ๐Ÿ˜›

#

thanks again and have good night/day wherever you are