#Reformedot-3ds-off-session
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hi ๐ it's not guaranteed that a payment using a previously setup Payment Method won't require the completion of 3DS. It is up to the issuer whether they require 3DS for a specific transaction.
When you create and process the Payment Intent from your backend, are you setting the off_session parameter to true?
https://stripe.com/docs/api/payment_intents/create#create_payment_intent-off_session
Complete reference documentation for the Stripe API. Includes code snippets and examples for our Python, Java, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET libraries.
confirm=False,
usage="off_session"
this when I create the setupIntent secret
off_session=False,
confirm=True
and this when I create the Payment Intent via backend
Okay, with:
off_session=True,
confirm=True
it looks like it works
Awesome, glad to hear that helped!
Any way to charge a setup Intent using a subscription?
When I try (even with the off_session=True) it fails
subscription = stripe.Subscription.create(
customer=new_customer["id"],
trial_period_days=30,
items=[{
'price': restock.plan.recurrent_product.price_id
}],
add_invoice_items=[{
'price': restock.plan.one_time_product.price_id
}],
off_session=True
Users get charged for the invoice items first, but it fails due to 3ds
The PaymentIntent is not attached to the subscription invoice, and I need that
but without the PaymentIntent, it just fails
Can you share the ID of a Subscription where you saw that behavior?
This is the customer: cus_MOv8aR2GqsiIUp
I'm using test mode
sub_1Lg7HwEtfggJJ5D3j3ylwyLB the sub
30 eur first month, 20 eur the following ones
And this customer: cus_MOuyaUm4jmQjKT gets charged for the first month using the PaymentIntent, but is not attached to the subscription invoice, and I need that
sub_1Lg78nEtfggJJ5D3IfOrd3M0 ^^
Thank you, pulling those up.
For this Subscription you seem to be using our 3184 test card which always requires authentication to be completed, regardless of whether the card was previously set up.
https://stripe.com/docs/testing#authentication-and-setup
We provide this as a test card because when a payment is processed it is up to the issuer whether they will require 3DS to be completed for that transaction. During the setup intent process we prepare to request exemptions from 3DS/SCA on future payments, but it's up to the issuer whether they will grant those exemptions.
I should test with the 3155?
Yup, that would be the better card for testing if your flow is setting payment methods up correctly.
Perfect thanks, hopefully our customer's cc dont force 3ds always