#Powerful Attack and Jackhammer
53 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Because Powerful Attack doesn't say you can spend focus outside of its activation.
If a rule that grants an out of activation attack allows you to spend focus on it, it'll be explicit.
So the rule restricting focus use doesn't specify an attack. It's just a general statement. That said, there are rules that just have a condition to allow for the use of focus usage out of activation like generator on the specter.
The wording not specifying anything about out of activation.
I disagree. Abilities tend to specify activation only.
In this case, the basic rule is "You can't spend focus outside of your activation", so that's what you need an exception to
Unless there's some restriction on spending for offensive related abilities, but I'm not sure there is
It's the same general templating that you see in things like MTG
Where "If a thing would only work if it carries an exception, it has it"
There's a reason I was specific in my initial statement
I understand the reasoning, but wouldn't that mean the specter would be unable to use its generator out of activation since it's a focus spend?
Here's an example of a thing granting out-of-activation attacks with the ability to spend fury.
Exactly
No cause it outlines that it can spend focus in that instance
The instance in powerful attack is when they make an attack
Powerful attack has the same outline though? If attack is made then can spend focus to powerful attack.
Calaban's feat doesn't specify out of activation either
It, uh, gives you explicit permission to boost them
Like powerful attack's conditional is an attack being made similar to how the Specter's conditional is being hit and taking damage for focus to be used.
Which you need because they're out of activation
My reading of powerful attack is that it gives explicit use of the boost as well.
Attack -> spend focus to get double boosts
It's not the same as a normal boost, which I agree would be stopped.
Thx Septic
To my credit, Travis indicated he would change them and the rules remain the same
Your interpretation wasn't wrong
Ah, thanks for the link
Cheers folks
Sadly, it's another one of those rules where you just need to have the ruling handy to point out when challenged. Since it works the opposite way from how the words in the book/cards read, and the actual rules haven't been updated or changed in the 6 months since it was previously asked.
Even then, it's not Powerful attack that's the issue, you can't use it. it's other abilities like Arcane Vortex that are nullified by this, except they aren't, by decree. So, you're not wrong to question it, because it doesn't make sense as written, it only makes sense by overriding that with a ruling on the internet.
Wasn't there something in the rulebook saying you can't spend focus out of activation or something?
Yes, that's exactly the issue. You can't spend focus out of activation, ever, period, unless specifically told otherwise.
But abilities like Arcane Vortex and Generator do not specifically state you can spend, so RAW they do nothing at all. This has been ruled to not be the case, but only because of the ruling contradicting the general rule.
When this came up 6 months ago the resolution was to just do it as the ruling states until they can adjust the actual rules, which they have not done yet and it's come back around to confusing a new person. The circle of life continues...
Sooo, we know we can't do it. But we are allowed to do it until it's changed?
No, you must abide by the Infernal ruling if you are playing by the rules.
Oh I read that backwards
Yeah I see what your saying. I'll keep playing it as Intended.
The ruling that you need to keep handy, which contradicts the RAW, is about Arcane Vortex and Generator, not about Powerful attack.
I'm aware. It came up a lot with Hades and his Wraith Shot
That was the source of the original question and ruling I do believe
My understanding as well.
Though in his case he can spend because he's spending a Soul, not boosting with a focus
Correct you are
Just one of those wacky warmachine situations where sometimes things work the opposite way and you don't know unless you know (and frequent the rules forums to know there even is a ruling)
Hopefully when they get the Rulings section fully operational in the app this will be much easier to convey at the table
Wish we had archival access to the old forums and wiki. But yeah, no worries.