When using Arc Web to Channel through amother model, is the COST off the spell reduced by 1 due to Empowered Arc Node?
Likewise, does the other model with Arc Node still need to be in the spellcaster's control range?
#Beaker and Arc Web
chilly dragon
prime isle
The way I read it, since you channel through Beaker first, you will get the reduced cost even if you then use Arc Web.
Also, when using Arc Web, the second channeling model just has to be within 10" of Beaker.
placid schooner
No(?). If the arc web target becomes the channeling model the Beaker isnt the channeling model anymore, ie. No Empowered Arcnode. Becomes the channeling model . Funnily written, need Infernal?
charred ocean
The way it reads is that first you channel through beaker and get the discount then beaker channels through another model which points the point of origin
So the discount would still happen
placid schooner
That only violates the channeling and spellcasting sequence, but yeah. I think the main question is, is it channeling through the beaker to another model (which violates the channeling rule) or is it getting the discount (which violates the spellcasting timing). Hence the infernal ruling (from an closure perspective). RAW is confusing.
charred ocean
That only violates the channeling and spellcasting sequence, but yeah. I think t...
it specifically says "this model can channel" referring to beaker doing the chanelling.
violating channeling and spellcasting sequence in the rulebook is fine per this rule in the rulebook under rule priority
rustic roost
Checking
rustic roost
The new model does not need to be in the control range and channeling in this manner will reduce the cost
chilly dragon
The new model does not need to be in the control range and channeling in this ma...
Does that mean that you cannot use Arc Web if Beaker is engaged or under the effect of something that prevents channeling?
e.g.
