Going forward, **do not DM or tag/reply

[vapid summit]

@timber fox Hello. Regarding application #1190, we received a notification about an issue with the balance display. We have checked and confirmed that the balance is displayed correctly. Could we ask you to re-examine this matter? We are ready to provide any necessary information to clarify the situation.

[vital spoke]

@lofty pike given some ambivalence in the latest update of Faq, can you confirm that voting with implicit address is still points-giving/qualifying?

thanks:)

[lost kite]

I have the same question. I hope they return the old rules.

[vital spoke]

I don't think it has been changed. Just want to be crystal clear

[tame bluff]

That's pilot task, right?

[lost kite]

Yes

[lofty pike]

wdym re: FAQ?
my understanding has consistently been that as long as the transaction's memo field contains the tpknam that you registered for the Shielded Expedition, this will transaction (and any qualifying ROID) will be associated with the registered account

[vital spoke]

the latest faq underlines importance of voting with validator and not implicit. Just want to make sure implicit still counts as formerly stated

[lofty pike]

ah! there are two different things:

1. passing a governance proposal: needs sufficient voting power. operators with lots of stake on their validator should vote with their validator to help get a proposal passed
2. getting ROID: requires including registered tpknam in memo field, regardless of what you use to vote with

[vital spoke]

good stuff.

thanks