#Galaxy Gang
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
galaxy will be great
This will be my large ship. đ
we could actually get our ship next year, isn't that crazy?
i honestly doubt but damn it does make me excited
why wouldn't we? Polaris is done. maybe they started galaxy already who knows
and polaris assets will speed up galaxy too
and the zeus stuff too. I think Galaxy is probably within reach before next Citcon, if not sooner
it's the main concept of next year (atm) so I doubt they'll release it for a small event. Either citcon or IAE (ILW is too soon)
i wonder if they ever start from the website holo viewer model when they go to work on a new ship
has anybody seen the galaxy in the tease?
I didn't notice it. Perseus though and I thought that was planned after Galaxy
did they even mention galaxy at all? like why not....
Absolutely nothing on the Galaxy at all. Really concerned at this point, given that they featured it in the base building panel last year
i feel like its been dropped for the starlancer BLD
i hope it still gets base building
Feel like 600i rework was dropped for it too
galaxy got shelved. Perseus pushed
Whatâs more concerning is that it didnât even make the 12 month pipeline teasers
probs cuz more want percy idk tho
Yeah seems they don't care about us.
well it's more profitable to sell multiple specialized ships than one modular ship that does nothing good and is a pain to balance
Where??
that's what im asking
nah
guys guys guys
in the tease were SOME of the ships coming in the next 12 months, and this was emphasised by whoever was speaking. not ALL of them were shown. there is still hope
you really think they wouldn't tease it knowing how wanted it is?
hopium is good. but let's be real we didn't heard of it since a year and this citcon would have been the exact moment to keep the hype up about galaxy
They said Polaris mid 2024, Galaxy late 2024, Perseus end 2024 or early 2025.
They never said that xD
Last Citcon!
Nope they gave theborder they would work on ships but never said a date except for Polaris which was "withing 12 months"
But be my guest find the moment they said that and give me a link. Ill happily reflect
I cannot. It is too difficult to find.
Yeah right last year citcon video are sooo hard to find...
i believe they said Polaris > Galaxy > Perseus
but also :/ (coming so soon , it , the galaxy)
TimestampâŠ
https://youtu.be/2otksAGrCOc?si=UYpoemCCOMS3Egdw
Took me exactly 15 sec
Presenting this yearâs newly released vehicles, with a focus on how lore of the past is shaping vehicles of the future, as well as a look at the pipeline itself and the new methodologies within.
00:00 - Talking Ship with John Crewe, Vehicle Director, and Ben Curtis, Vehicle Art Director
01:10 - Crusader Spirit A1
04:18 - RSI Zeus Mk II
15:30 - ...
And the Timestamp to where they said things?
Dude dont push. youre being annoying. Its a 40 min video and its easy to fast forward to a specific moment.
Youre wrong period.
Throwing unverified false informations on me without even verifying yourself.
Check your source next time
Prove it
This isn't hard, yo
They've already deviated from this by doing the MISC ships, so sort of hard to take them at their word, given that they ignored the Galaxy this entire Citcon
Yeah but nowhere they said Polaris galaxy and perseus were planned to release in 2024 like previously said.
Peoples take their fantasies for reality sometimes
Meh I was just commenting on the build order. I never believe CIG time estimates anyway
you pulled that straight outta your behind my friend
they literally never gave dates
Nice to see Brist is still consistently wrong about everything after half a year.
Fake News!
Believe it or not, also Fake News!
@stoic inlet quit trolling, or if you do, do it somewhere else and not in this thread
Just because I can't find proof doesn't mean it didn't happen. I don't intend to go back through a 6 hour video or whatever but I am quite sure that it did infact happen.
Regardless, I shall depart as requested.
it did not man
i can't be bothered to find evidence therefore it might exist is not an argument, when it's proven otherwise that they did not give dates
part where they talk about the rsi ships in that video is 37:40 to 39:44, go ahead find where they give dates
Your in a group of people who want the galaxy saying you know the release window of the galaxy while the rest say they never said that,
Out of all the places to say your thought is fact about something is not the collective around that thing, who grab what strings we can,
The galaxy had no mention at citcon, they also said their big ship focus was rsi but now the kraken and pioneer are both being worked on.
And a misc ship family just a bit smaller than it has one that comes out at IAE.
To me it seems the "focus" is gone and the galaxy is not a poster job like the Perseus was for the 12 month video.
Now we sit like mostly everyone else, no idea if our jpeg is next.
nah if they said Perseus release date last year I would've known/remembered and been waiting for it
all they said was Polaris being made first, should only take about a year and then galaxy and then Perseus so by that logic it would be polaris late 2024 galaxy mid-late 2025 if they re use lots of made assets and it's a smaller ship so it may take less time (although it's modular so could take longer) and then Percy would be sometime 2026 if they had done it this way
but I guess they've skipped the galaxy here
@worthy yacht you probably will want medical if you're going to use it like a mobile base like i am
ah, I plan to get it, but I'm holding off until they showcase more base building
I was gonna originally get the cargo mod, but figured there's no reason to when there are already so many cargo ships
especially for the price
because with doasm and when injury tiers matter on respawn you won't be able to just get respawned fully healed character say if your injuries were t1 and your bed is t2
you will need the t1 bed, and i think there was something saying lower tier beds (t3 is lowest iirc, as number goes down tier goes higher) do more dna damage or something like that to your character so that ties into doasm
don't quote me on that, i dont remember
it's up to a lot of interpretation because CIG has been so vague with it
buy in game tbh
it seems to change evry year
don't buy modules ever on pledge store imo
true, it'll probably be pretty fairly priced
might be nice to hold onto one with store creds but for 1.0 release they're useless
so when you get wiped you have it, but for release get rid of that shit
yeah
except maybe warranties will play a role on it so, idk. have to consider that actually
would be frustrating to lose a module every time
with warranty I assume you'll get the value back
still would need to purchase it again though
having warranty on the modules could be worth ngl
tbh, they did said that all things from cit con (beside Sq and basebuilding since it was just starting work) where gonna be released in the next 12 months
People tend to hear what they want to hear (and what fit their fantasies).
They repeatedly said "THIS will be released in the next 12 months" on different panels and sometimes multiple times in each panels. Imo it means what they just said was to be released in the next 12 months.
Those who understood that EVERYTHING said at citcon was to be released in the next 12 months might have misunderstood or made an hopium OD idk. But it doesn't need much braincells to understand it was impossible to get all three RSI ships in 12 months. Just as it was impossible to get star engine and pyro (it was said to be available January 2024 iirc lmao) in less than 12 months.
But anyway idc if people want to believe in unicorns. Galaxy is probably shelved having a drink with Merchantman right now. I got rid of mine actually so it no longer concern me
CR during his closing speach said that everything showed at citcon would come in the next 12 months. I wasnt talking abt what the devs said in their panels
but don't get me wronng, I am not saying it should have happened because CR said something. this is CIG afterall
Is there a chance it will be announced at IAE
Unlikely. I hope so but it wonâtâŠ
If so I'll trade my 600i for it
FrickâŠ
???hmm.
It gets worse
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/3/thread/galaxy-clarification/7328459
TL;DR - Galaxy confirmed after Purseus, and they're doing a "flashy thing" (acting like it never happened) on base building.
wow no base building for galaxy...
so is the idris going to lose the railgun when the anvil capital is revealed at IAE 
I'm pretty chill, we still have Refinery and Crafting though they did announce the Galaxy for Base Building and should stick to that.
But I do find it hilarious that the whole "treat it as speculative unless it's on the pledge store or in game" statement also applies to the BLD Lancer because it's not in store either.
Despite showing it off last year at CitCon there are no plans to make a construction focussed variant of the Starlancer.
~ CIG 2025
Heh now he's trying to soften things a bit
I agree that the design for drones doesn't work well with the underbelly module, however if you look at the BLD, the drones are coming in/out of the lower level on the side. This could have been handled via the Galaxy module too, simply by a droppable platform that the drones could come in/out of, or heck even just let them land/take off from the rear hangar.
At any rate the point is moot. I find the whole thing a little bizarre, because base building is still a ways off. He could have approached it completely differently to begin with, by saying something like "we're still trying to figure out how to best handle a base building module, so for that reason it won't be available when base building comes out".
Time to burn my galaxy. đ»
this is just shit
cig 2023: you get galaxy 2025 and you have base building!
cig 2024: you get galaxy 2026, no base building.
What is the point of the galaxy without base building lol
I'm not even pissed it doesn't have base building or is a year later, i'm pissed they gave us a timeline and an extra feature then took it away
More expensive caterpillar? A refinery ship???
large cargo and medical?!
medical galaxy fills a spot no other ship does
There are already so many large cargo options, it would be the only in game medical ship for a while, but thatâs one expensive medical ship
apollo has t1 but no snubs and very little space for supplies or a rover, and the endeavor is way huger
My copium huffing involves the fact that the Galaxy had other neat modules to begin with and uh... who needs base building... er I mean.. there are other ways to base build... yeah... 
Totally not needed, now take your $400 cargo/medical ship 
Hell
If basebuilding isnât coming with it
Why is it even delayed
Because they decided the Perseus would be easier because it shares more art assets with the Polaris than the Galaxy
No one has the refinery mod, or cares about it, cargo and medical shouldnât be an issue
Theyâll probably wait until the arrastra in 2026+ to even give it refinery
If they donât back out of that as well
Mobile crafting and refining capability is a bigger deal than people realize....
The issue is that itâs nothing to ride home about, we already have dedicated refinery ships that can do the same thing but at an industrial level
Galaxy with refinery module is a waste of money
Parallel processing to reduce bottlenecks will be a wonderful option
I thought people invested in the core Galaxy hull bc it will have the potential for future modules beyond the current three. That was the initial presentation for the strengths of a modular ship compared to a specialist. Not as good at any one task, but you can swap out and retain potential for additional tasks in the future
Or haul supplies to an org outpost with the cargo module. Then fly back to Stanton to refit to refinery mod, and come back and support on site refinement. It's not going to be faster to do so than two specialized ships - but it will only take ONE ship, for those for whom that matters.
Exactly, i am not sure why this a difficult subject to grasp.
SC has time sink traps EVERYWHERE, the Galaxy will be a cheat code to speed up objectives and offer flexibility to support services while being unmanned.
I just want the ship itself..
I wonder if CIG wold close my acc if I make a complain to the the Consumer Protection Office

After they get every cent from the BLD, then maybe we will get some news on a building module đ
Who knows how much we will be waiting for it tho
Probably.
Apollo does it better at 1/3rd the price.
@reef fableâŠ
Clown show, âno plans for base building moduleâ, to âfully committedâ in one day
An it was at this moment, they knew they fcked up
so tue galaxy is next after perseus? maybe thats why it wasnt in citcon, they are not sure if they can squeeze both into the next 12 months
When did it go to fully commited??
Hahaha so I went to bed maybe being wrong but turns out I was right. Go figure.
Huh??
Sounds to me like they don't actually know how it is going to work because the modular section likely only opens from the bottom and while landed large drones might not be able to get out easily.
And the BLD is different?
So it is pretty likely an issue of them not knowing how to actually do it.
The starlancer drones looked like they are attached to the sides
I get it though. Building a ship from scratch to make it work is likely easier than making a modular ship that is poorly designed for it work.
Uh... I don't think you understand how the Galaxy module section works if you think that's true lol.
Also, I went to bed reading John's statements and thought I might end up being wrong and have to admit that I was wrong about it losing the basebuilding module. I woke up and read the latest comments and nope they committed to it.
But yeah the Galaxy's middle module section doesn't appear capable of "opening" from the top. So if the ship is landed and the drones have to come out the bottom... and they're large drones that gives very little clearance to get out.
The new message
So now it is fully commited to being in or out?
Why not use something other than drones?
So completely upend their design for the system just to support a single ship? lol
Drones make sense for basebuilding. I'm not sure of what else would make sense that isn't in essence just a different kind of drone. And using a standard is pretty important for consistency in functionality. I own a Galaxy (Complete pack) and I was very much looking forward to buying the basebuilding module. BUT I do understand why it would be shelved given that it presents some challenges that they might not have considered when they revealed it.
Mech drones, yes.
And how would mech drones not have the same issue?
And yeah I'm just looking at the Starlancer BLD presentation and it looks like its drones come out the side.
Anyway, I do think they will figure it out... I just think they probably realized that it would be harder to implement than they had anticipated when they showed it initially.
well they walk around as opposed to flying.
Okay I don't think you are actually understanding the nature of the problem lol. It's the issue of space. There isn't much of it underneath the ship on level ground and a lot of land isn't going to be level. Unless that mech can compress itself to an extremely low size and still maintain mobility that wouldn't solve the problem and would actually create a few new ones.
Well can a person walk around down there? They said there were cargo lifts right?
Again this isn't an unsolvable problem. They could open up the back so that the drones can leave via the rear. They can simply have the drones leave before it lands. There are plenty of options.
Have you ever landed a large ship with a cargo bay on uneven terrain? It can be very problematic lol.
And the Galaxy doesn't look like it has a great deal of clearance landed. On flat ground it has enough to do what it needs to do but if the ground wasn't flat (as it wouldn't be if you're building a base) you might run into issues.
Yes, many times. Why?
Why would you not build on flat ground?
Uh what? You would, but that doesn't help the ship before the base has been built or any foundations laid.
But the foundations donât flatten the ground. The foundations are built on already flat ground.
No, foundations literally deform terrain. That's one of their main purposes. But this isn't relevant to that as the ship wouldn't be landing on foundation before it builds lol.
But I still assume it would be flat. Are the cargo elevators just not usable on unpathed terrain? Because theres no reason a human sized drone canât function if not.
It's very rare to encounter properly flat unobstructed natural terrain in SC. But anyway as pointed out in the main channel John pretty much confirmed what I have been saying that the issue is likely due to the drones navigation and how the Galaxy modules are designed. So I'm not entirely sure what more there would be to discuss.
How to either:
- Redesign it to be fine. Why canât they exit out the top or sides.
- Make the drones able to navigate in that space. How much space is there anyways?
not even sure what's the connection with the galaxy and foundations... they are not printing the buildings with the ships itself anymore
1 - they would need to redesign the hull of the ship to allow drones to exit. they could redesign the interior wall and let them exit through the hangar
They could. Again no one is saying it isn't possible or there isn't a solution. Just that as the Galaxy is currently designed... it isn't really ideal for large drones to be going in and out of from the ground. That's it. That's all it is. Doesn't mean it can't be fixed... just that it requires more thinking.
Doesnât the module have roof access? The ship is basically a donut isnât it?
i don't think it does. even tho it should.. so it can get changed for other modules
it should have top doors from where the modules to get out, and put back in, idk
Basically the Galaxy modules ONLY have exits at the bottom as of right now. Making an exit at the sides or top would require some degree of redesign probably more significant than people think. So if they didn't do that, then the outcome remains the same that they have to leave through the bottom. That space... is very tight to be having large AI flying objects go out of without colliding with either the ship or the ground.
No, the only exit for the module is underneath. That's that issue lol
redesign is kind of a big word for a ship that is still in early phases of concept, but i get what you saying
technically at the back too. there is a door between the module and the hangar
Yeah but that's a standard sized door I believe. So drones probably aren't gonna fit through there unless they opened that whole section up which I suspect they don't wanna do because then it'd massively expand the "hangar" space.
imo, they could redesign the interior wall and allow the drones to exit through the hangar, with a drone door
And ultimately it would turn the two rooms into one big room potentially.
drone doors
Hmm, that's a thought. Doors specifically tailored to the drones that can't be used for anything else. Or even perhaps a launch system that hooks up to that wall so that there's the doorway and two launch tubes on either side of it. Basically you clear the hangar, open er up then shoot the drones out the back.
Did y'all read this update already? Idk how I missed it earlier
Excellent?
Not really
Shows they can change back to dropping the module at the drop of a hat
Canât believe what they say
Fun fact, ground based pathfinding around terrain and the weird ass mazes people will make out of their buildings is a lot trickier than flying small objects in open space
This whole incident reeks of poor internal and corporate communications to be fair.
That and high level staff not knowing how to PR speak but trying it anyway and ending up with something that sounds corporate/detached but in a way that pisses people off.
I don't even care about the basebuildung module. I just love the design of the galaxy and there are plenty of modules to choose from.
Eh... that's not the takeaway I would have gotten from it. "Fully committed" is pretty much the exact opposite of "current plans". It doesn't really leave any room for dropping it. Not to say it can't happen but I would say it doesn't "show" that.
Well many other people do. Myself included.
chat
galaxy is the best ship ngl
anyone know when we can fly it
pledged it last year but i havent played in ages
probably 2026
4th best. Javelin, 400i, and 890J exist.
Ok⊠now I wanna know why it canât just have grabby arms!
Because it doesn't exist beyond a concept sketch or basic white/greybox and they haven't thought about the actual implementation yet.
don't forget folks, if it's not in the store or in game, it doesn't exist yet
And never mind what we've said before. It's all speculative.
Polaris is speculation 
The memes about pyro never coming were true
They probably can but it would be a lot more fiddly than with the Starlancer as the way the Galaxy is designed simply isn't suited to it as John said, and he isn't wrong. Having the only opening section be at the bottom does create that problem. Though of course there would be solutions. Having a mechanism that drops down and the arms pop out would likely work.
So⊠do it! I want my Galaxy build module!
ok bro
show me the snub bay, rover storage and 64 scu of cargo plus the space for all the crew that galaxy has on the apollo
and show me how it can have 1 more bed module so it can have the same amount of beds as the galaxy
It does have the same amount of space. They both have 2 modules. But the Apollo has drones which are better than rovers. No cargo is need. Drones also act similarly to a snub except it gets 6 of them.
galaxy has 1x t1, 2x t2, and 3x t3
apollo can have any of those in 2 combinations, it would need 3 modules to compete
you literally have no clue what you're talking about
They both have the same size modules.
galaxy has those beds by default
Grab the ships brochure.
the apollo can choose two of either 3
Galaxy needs to buy a module.
Its the Apollo that has them.
you're literally wrong
Nuh uh! Go look at the ship brochure.
you're literally goddamn wrong my friend
galaxy has 1x t1, 2x t2, 3x t3 by default
apollo has 2 of 3
It can choose from those.
Now look at Galaxy.
^
so galaxy basically has each module that the apollo can have in its med module, that would leave apollo with less beds
Check. The. Ship. Site.
Apollo has 2 modules, Galaxy has 2 modules.
They both have the same options.
But Galaxy costs a lot more.
They have the same number of beds.
Drones replace both of those and better.
Why do you need cargo on a hospital?
to carry your goddamn medical supplies?!
hello??
ok put your healed patients onto a drone and ship them off that way
galaxy and apollo are not the same kind of ship, and comparing them is simply wrong
Eh??
apollo is a csar vehicle whereas a galaxy is a small hospital
It is for collecting people from dangerous situations.
bro are you not reading
so a csar vehicle
Count the beds.
it's not a hospital it's a csar vehicle
bro read the screenshots i sent at you
It has the same medical capacity as Galaxy. What is CSAR.
You misread them.
apollo can have 6 TIER 3 beds
galaxy has 1 tier 1, 2 tier 2, 3 tier 3
apollo can have a selection of two of any of those three options
read
goddamn read
combat search and rescue
apollo is the ship you will send into the battlefield, galaxy is the ship that will sit in orbit wherever you're fighting or land far away and do your actual healing or respawning jobs
they serve different roles
Realization

i'm not shitting on the apollo don't get me wrong, it's a great ship, but to say the galaxy is an overpriced apollo is simply wrong
they serve two different roles, just like how a prospector and orion serve different roles. or a cutty vs caterpillar
apollo goes into battle, galaxy stays just close enough to battle
so the galaxy is a small endeavor and the apollo is a big pisces
I feel like I should get some kinna prize or trophy for reading that whole exchange...
fair
Man, the reading comprehension on display here is nothing short of astounding
i hope im not the one being memed on
Depending on how stuff like Trauma Echoes gets implemented, the Galaxy might be able to support 3 beds worth of triage/regeneration at T3 and then moving those that need it to T2 and T1 beds to remove lingering regen debuffs like trauma echoes.
It definitely feels like more of a support hospital ship.
^
apollo is csar, galaxy is small hospital, endeavor is big hospital
anything smaller or in between is csar or triage or emergency work
Apollo can probably as a hospital as well for smallee scale org gameplay, given you can do a 1 T1, 3 T3 setup. But it's definitely better suited for and designed for CSAR.
My general read on the speculative Galaxy is that it is generally a backline support craft that anchors operations but doesn't quite work in a vacuum.
Refinery needs others running mining ops in smaller ships to work as it doesn't exactly have mining capabilities of its own.
Medical has the Galaxy in more of a static backline than an active medivac role.
Cargo seems like it lacks convenient loading tools like tractor beams or the like and you have to load from the belly and rear. So it's probably better suited for moving large amount of stuff and regular trading rather than the time limited hauling contacts. There seems to be ceiling mounted tractors as part of the module for filling the bay though, so it's easy to sort inside with a bottleneck of loading the bay
Nah, I was referring to Bristerian.
The only way the Apollo gets more beds is if it gets 2x T3 modules
Then it shares the same bed amount as the galaxy, however it then doesn't have ANY T2 or T1 bed
If Apollo wants a T1 or T2 bed it gets less total beds
Meanwhile the galaxy will always have 6
Plus the T3 bed in the Nursa it carries and another T3 bed in a medical pisces giving the galaxy nearly more beds than 2 Apollo's
tbh in the back im probably gonna have argo personnel maybe
if it has space for a c8r ill have that too
if they make an argo medivac type thing i'll go nuts
I can't wait to see what we can cram in there. Seems like an Argo personnel carrier and a C8R could fit with some creative parking
Why the personnel?
I mean, I love the mpuv, but it's lack of quantum drive really hampers it
so you can send the crew down and stay in orbit
just use the pisces for that^^
now that you can snap chairs to cargo grids that should be doable quite easily
because if i ever use the galaxy in say org battles or JT, it will be to ship people on and off the ship
therefore more space for more people means more better
park it 30-40km away or whatever the safe distance is from AO and have 2 mpuv personnel rotating in and ouf
genius
This is especially useful in ground operations where you want your respawn further away from the action (though I THINK the T3 beds would still have that 20km distance like the Nursa does?), so your troops would spawn back up in the Galaxy, re-equip, then get ferried back.
galaxy is definetely gonna get spottet at over 20km range though
galaxy would have longer range for T1 and T2
do MPUV p have enough fuel for multiple 40km trips?
probably
if not I'll carry fuel
alright cool
if not, c8x or something
they better not fall
or honestly you could have a dropship, have people take an elevator down to it
or have the dropship open the ramp and back up to the galaxy lol
the concept art has the galaxy with a large dock door with a medium door inside of the same frame. so dropship wise a legionaire could dock with it
where did you seen that? i am trying to look for the pic
oh the interior pics
yeah but ramp backing into it is cooler
yea I would just do that and stick aload of chairs in there but idk if C8X life support is built for that many people, personnel probably is because it's literally a person carrier so it has to
i mean they can breathe in their helmets perfectly fine
when desync is fixedâąïž
else we all dyin
yeah but not for long right?
i mean that'd be cancerous for planet surface gameplay
yeah literally impossible
they'd be silly to add that
should be fine then, as long as you don't need to eat
GalaxyBros: Do we think we'll be able to fit a Terrapin Medi in the ship hangar? The C8R fits perfectly, but it might be nice to have the added armor and better bed of the Medi for field ops.
not a chance
And here I was hoping I'd find something I wanted to buy this IAE...
Walk off the ramp and fall out the hangar door...
no
Thinking of grabbing some of the modules while they're available... But which ones?
Or I could just knock them both into buyback over the course of a couple of days.
im on the 'aUEC buy modules' train. i aint spending the price of a AAA game on one room ofa ship đ
True, I think I'd like one to start with though. The Tali modules are like 8mil aUEC each, so Galaxy modules are probably going to be pricey aUEC wise as well, and having a ship with an empty room when you start out isn't great.
(plus there will probably be that point where they release the Galaxy but modules aren't purchasable in game for a few months)
i'm like almost sure the modules will be buyable right off the bat
yeah not everyone owns a module with real money
they could just have the base
and people who get galaxy as a loaner for something will need to get modules unless they just default to âgalaxy hopeâ for endeavour or whatever depending on what sets/packs you own
itâs like releasing the polaris without access to the torpedos or smth
releasing the hull b without cargo grids
itâll just be the ship thatâs exclusive for a bit
and me a galaxy owner that has medical and cargo modules may want to try refinery, so iâll be able to buy and use it in game
otherwise it just hurts galaxy owners if they canât use their ship, modules will be purchasable in game ship will not
like why did you spend 380 or 500 when it goes up in price to have a shell
with no cargo grid
In the event that you are allowed to use a larger snub in that space
you canât lol
thereâs doors between the hangar and module room on purpose
Yes.
The clearance with the doors open would allow one to park the nose deeper into the "empty" room if this functionality becomes available.
Based on personal assumptions or has the layout and door functionality been confirmed by CIG?
have you never looked at the ships layout? đ
Perosnal assumptions and ship concepts are a deadly duo!
like why did you spend 380 or 500 when it goes up in price to have a shell
I was answering this question above with a possibly answer
hmm there might be a door here
not 100% sure tho
we need a specialist to confirm
No worries, this is the fun phase of a ship launch:
- Functionality speculation
I'd hope so, but the Retaliator modules took a while and everyone who had one in game was left with an empty Tali with no bombs or cargo.
Hope for module availability in game, prep for them to be pledge store only for a patch cycle because CiG didn't think about the implications of having a modular ship without readily available modules.
is it just me or does the back door look kinda ugly?
yes
its just you
back doors are always beautiful
đ
no but the way its just massive with the tiny engines too lol
i think if it went flat then outward a bit the flaat again it would look so much better, and the engines should be a biiiiiiit bigger cause no way those can push that massive thing lol
the door is the one thing i dont like abt the ship lol
otherwise its a beauty
what ship would you put in it?
C8R
I want to see if a 135c can fit
it might
probably will
tuck the nose through the module room door frame
if the door can be held open
it probably cant to prevent larger ships going in
From the dimensions it does look like I can fit one in and park it at an angle and forgo some cargo.
Which is good enough for me.
Ya think it should have a brig module đ
that could be cool
tbh i think policing gameplay should be like âbring-them-in-warmâ contracts where you can go out and detain people and then out them in a brig while you drive to the mearest detention center
maybe like a ânet gunâ that can lock on to somebody
handcuff beam
Tesla Coil ray of death and incineration.
Burnt my jpeg. Decided just to keep the Apollo. Slimming down to solo or two person ships.
Grab a brush and put a little make-up?
is anyone doin ccu to galaxy? i got pulse lti but im dumb to make my way to galaxy. some halp? ty
I recommended stopping over here for CCU, very helpful with finding great deals:
https://discord.com/channels/82210263440306176/1079505748075221092
im awake
im asleep
Wake up again!
galaxy my beloved
Absence makes the heart go fonder
Anyone got any new news about the galaxy?
no
no
theyâll just do a âhey you can upgrade to the new complete pack for 80 dollarsâ
it's supposed to come out after the Perseus, and the Perseus is 12 month or so
The complete pack would have stated on its sale page if it updated over time or meant the collection at that point
I would prefer to avoid a Carrack type release.
And Polaris...
What features are still being developed for the Polaris?
Captains quarters decor, Refueling, rearming of ships in the hangar.
Look at the Carracks Captains Quarters compared to the Polarises Captains Quarters and see how bad things are.
Compared to the Galaxy's proposed features, these are/were insignificant.
What are the proposed features? Base building module.
The modules themselves are the features of the ship, like refining.
Yes. But what about those is that much different?
How the Galaxy functions???
those are NEVER coming đđđ»
do you guys think the galaxy will be good for high tier bunker running
mainly to collect armour and weapons
the bottom front turret seems great for taking out turrets
for the gun turrets
will it be 2 size 5s for each turret??
They're not pilot controlled, it's shields are only S3, and while we don't know the gun sizes, the turrets are S5s which should mean 2 Size 4s. Unless we get some turrets slaved by default I wouldn't use it as a hostile bunker craft without friends along for the ride.
With allies, yeah you can set it up with good medical facilities. Still not too tough and the large footprint is a problem but medical ships are always nice to have when doing bunker runs.
The galaxy turrets are dual size 5
BRO WHERE MY SHIP AT
Give or take a couple months 1-1.5 years
To go from "yeah we're gonna do the RSI big ships together because they all share design stuff!" to "Yeah nm on the Galaxy..." is a bit of a gut punch.
really do b like that
i was ok with the swap of perseus after pol instead of galaxy but when john crewe forgot it had been concepted yet alone us told and shown (kind of) a construction module coming it hit hard. nearly got rid of mine but i just love the look too much
i think basebuilding module gonna be a disapointment and CIG figured it out thus tried removing it
think about it: all basebuilding ships land then deploy drones meaning Galaxy will be deploying drones downwards thus this might limit drone size
you do not have to deploy them landed, silly argument imo
even if it does have to deploy landed unless your drone is literally bigger than a c8r it will still be able to go downward and leave
If you look at the TACBLD, that drone arm is pretty dang low to the ground when landed. I think they could easily come up with one or more solutions to the problem for the Galaxy, even if it was just a middle section that dropped down from the module, then had a swing arm that extended the drone, similar to the TACBLD's arm. Edit: Why am I saying TAC?
Well we dont know if ship drones require that materials are inside the ship so this could mean that Galaxy will need to hover whole building process
no not at all
a: access through the rear door
b: a seperate elevator with an automatic conveyor system going on it so the drones can request items from the ship
<3
Anyone know when I can next buy it?
IAE
Unless it comes out before IAE
(it won't)

you never know

guys galaxy next year!!!!!
apparently after Perseus yeah, from what was said at that citizen bar
I will fill my balloon with Hopium and dream of 2026's IAE with a Galaxy release.
Would be nice for people that pledge ships they get updates on their status
You did though, they said after Perseus, thatâs way more information than other JPGâs get
Wdym
They have said for months that the galaxy comes after the Perseus
In Beijing they said the Perseus released IAE this year
That puts the galaxy in 2026
They also said in Beijing that itâll use Zeus assets instead of Polaris assets (which the Perseus is using)
Ooooo
Galaxy is 20% chance for ILW and 80% for IAE
Of 2026...
Yep.....
yeah my money is on Nov 2026
probably ye
Do we think the galaxy will have a engine room or any other walk in component rooms?
maybe the side rooms by the hangar?
the oranges thingies are lifts so ton of room for just lifts
where my ship at
Probably IAE 2956
nothing but a traitor with that name
Imagine we had a torpedo module
my sweetheart
Is this ship out yet ? it looks so sexy
Next year :(
Sad đ„Č
we need moar space dorito
I was like "normal galaxy pic" then i notice the gun barrel
Then the turret
"how much visibility do you want from bridge?"
"none"
Do you fly from the cockpit or the turret?
both
the galaxy bridge isnt that much diffrent from perseus in field of view maybe at bit less to the side
but full front but only from the top is same for both of them
Galaxy's bridge is further in the front while the Perseus is more in the back and elevated
the elevation isn't going to add much cos the bridge isn't positioned to the side like the Pegasus concept nor does the glass go past the 180 degree point
this is my interpretation
the galaxy has the red view from cockpit then 2 side turrets and a bottom turret which has full 360 view of their zone horizontal and probably a 70-80 degree incline away from vessel giving a manned galaxy full view of all but its close above aft
the perseus has a big front basically sharing the cockpit view a top plus back small turret viewing behind it and a bottom turret which may be the same area view as the galaxy bottom turret
the cockpits basically have the same view but the turrets make the perseus side its worse sight line and the galaxy's the top aft
first time im getting back into this in months
will the galaxy get released before new year
im going to say yes
just my opinion
IAE Galaxy
then start pumping on Arrastra
i am really hoping it will
i doubt it but still
tbh i should save to get it out of buy backs
should pick up the CCUs to lock in the price this IAE
and then start a warbond chain
i havent ever done that before though
i will need help lmao
i want it LTI as well but i think thats too much to wish for lmao
no you could get it LTI for sure
oh nice
its a bit confusing at first but much much better than buying it out right.. there are options out there like gray market but still having to pay atleast 60% of the melt value up front which can be pricey
vs buying a $5 - 10 ccu here and there
and saving through the entire year
awesome
i have what 2 months until IAE right
i have 300 in store cred i can use
is there anyone who can help me get this going
Right @sonic gorge
Iris the Empress of CCUs may be able to explain this much more efficiently and quickly than i
but i can try untill she gets heres
so
lets take a look at the current shop.
the M2 Hercules has a Standard Price of : $520
But with Warbond is $485 ... so theres, $35 of savings
and you basically want to chain the warbond offers together
the difference is warbond is new money... cant use store credit
ahh ok
i am trying to not spend much money on this game
i want the galaxy but i do not want to spend ÂŁ300 lmao
i think i might do store cred until i can pay like ÂŁ50 real money
so i would do this
Get the Galaxy CCU. Probably Valkyrie to Galaxy this IAE
Starlancer to Galaxy is also an option. its $5 just to secure the price
can use Store credit for that
if you want to get the Galaxy LTI, will need to pick up an LTI ship of some sort ... There's something called. "Grays Market Shiv" which will be a straight to flyable
anything new coming Citcon, IAE, and into next year thats cheap enough to get the LTI token, then CCU with store credit for the Tac to Galaxy
awesome
that is a lot of help
i will probably keep this corsair pledged so i might do corsair to valk
then valk to galaxy
or
i cash in the Corsair
i buy an LTI ship
upgrade to the valk
then to the galaxy
well
upgrade to the corsair
then valk
then galaxy
and i have enough time to save up as well
thanks a lot
keep an eye peeled. đ see how it goes
CCU game says this atm for LTI 
yeah not happening lmao
after the 19th
i gotta save like a grand
so 5 weeks of work
then i can save for the Galaxy
we got a date for IAE??
also can i not save up and use a buy back token to get it out of buy backs
or does ccu chains not work like that
November 19th ish i think
ahh damn
aight imma need to grind the shit out of work then
you mean before 2025 ends? hell no
it'll be a 2026 release
If we get a galaxy citcon teaser, galaxy will probably release later this year of early next year
And im hoping I can snack 1-2 valkyrie to galaxy ccus
i doubt galaxy before iae 2026
idk with how much asset the apollo used (im salty about where this ship sits other than the cockpit and exteriro which are great internals and compnents less so) the galaxy might be closer than we realise
The galaxy and Perseus are pretty close from the kits and Design
Galaxy heavily relies on perseus and will be in (active) production after Perseus release
Probably already getting touched by someone right now
huh?!
its not gonna be before iae 2026
just not gonna happen imo

I agree but probably not before IAE doesnt stop us getting images earlier
the issue with the galaxy is that two of the supposed modules are things that CIG hasn't even hinted at being close
I fear that it'll just be another slop release like the carrack where its supposed modularity gets thrown out the door in favor of being an overpriced cargo ship
build a chain but keep options open for chain to become Arrastra in the event that the Galaxy is quite literally hot shit and a small construction ship can do what it can do but for a fraction of the cost (for building)
I want to see Galaxy succeed but seeing CIG track record in espsecially modularity... its just not happening anytime soon
at least the galaxy is the cheapest way to get a carrack still lol
carrack needs fixing, but they've been doing imrpovements over time, so hopefully they'll fix the cargo hold
Tbh
Look at the tally
We have cargo and torpedo
Only 1 is a real new module
That being the cargo modules
We are still supposed to get
Dropship module and habitstion module
Plus this
Titan Armour dropper 
Medical seems a bit redundant now that Apollo is huge
but i guess by that logic, hte cargo one is redundant because C2 /shrug
Galaxy has 20 potential respawns
3 t3, 2 t2 and 1 t1
6 spawns on the t3
6 on the t2
8 on the t1

We going back to station with this one
Olympian paint
Concierge
Blue and black
Hmm
Rough because Perseus looks good by itself
Wrong chat
Fkn hell
Sorry Galaxy Pals
wow, way to rub in that we have an in-engine shot
nah
its dropship with medical wym
a tali with med is much closer to medivac than the apollo sadly
6 s2 vs 4 s2 with more armour, loads of turrets loads of crew beds, so you can land and bottom turrets go extract while top defend.
with the growth but still medium components and lost drones in gameplay plan for now it sits weirdly.
galaxy med is a much better large hospital ship while tali could be a much better extractor large while medipin is a extractor medium.
the only way apollo beats galaxy med is how much will bigger ships cost to run and need engineering since apollo is a lot less mass, cheaper parts and a lower crew need
Connie will probably grow in it's rework
Connie casually becoming the size of a Perseus
apollo needed to be way closer to concept metrics, had a wider ramp entry or an elevator in the triage area for fast extraction
the amount of wasted space on that ship is diabolical
Galaxy would really be used as a mobile hospital if they dont change the medbeds
Since it would be come the only ship with a t1 bed
I would also like 2 paints for each module
3 Industriel paints and 1-2 medical paints
what
no
idris and apollo already have t1
idris got its t1 downgraded to t2
sure apollo already have t1
oh ye i forgot that
c8r intro to medical,
then cutty vs medipin, choose more beds or better bed
then apollo, more beds and better beds options
then galaxy med, adds more beds, rover and pisces bay
then endeavour hope, they flying hospital station
Thats on the 2nd floor
Pool table just screams rec room
I also like/ dislike the airlock placement
Being just a turn from the bridge
Okay
Just read the q&a
The room between the internal elevator and the component room is a locker room
i wouldn't call it goat, it's a jack of all trades master of none
ok at everything you want to do but it's gonna be equievalent to ships smaller in size given the role
Or that
I dont care about that tbh
Im just questioning if the galaxy could release before ironclad since she relies on the Perseus production
I think the Galaxy could because it's using Zeus Kit / Apollo kit, and probably even Perseus kit... THE RSI KIT
I'm so dumb
They close though
Galaxy was in production for a little before they swapped to Perseus because it shared with Polaris
Now they got a Mantis interior rework, Meteor, Apollo... They can cook the Galaxy.
Thats what im thinking
Galaxy gonna be on speed dial
But the modules are in need of proper functions
Unlike the tally needing to be claimed to be usable
galaxy prob iae next year
IC might be ILW
i mean yeah you may not care but being the goat of multi role and being able to do some roles ok is wildly different
it's basically apollo with hangar, better cargo grid caterpillar/worse c2, and the refinery we don't know much about yet
with the current state of game galaxy is just a c2 but grid is smaller because there's a hangar, there's no other reason to use it
since refinery is gonna be excluded from launch almost certainly
the only thing galaxy got going right now is looks, that's the only reason i'm gettin it too
I think we'll get all 3 modules since it was designed that way from the start
Tally is an unfortunate excuse of a modular ship but it was never meant to be originally but here we are
Also ironclad will probably be my salvage Plattform with the salvage starter or just a golem mining Plattform for the aaron halo
Galaxy will be more friend activity since we still need confirmation on drake ore pod compatibility
i also noticed that the galaxy is in talks on different discords
well it's carrack 2.0 so the fever pitch makes sense đ
and its cheaper than the carrack too
i also hope the cargo modules elevator has a grid
also this airlock is a dangerous placement
not like RSI to make it so easy to get in and out of their ships
i meant boarding
I know đ
a
also, found your reddit account? lol
https://www.vxreddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1nnhnyg/rsi_galaxy_what_is_this_room_does_it_belong_to/
there is nothing to indicate we'd get refinery module on launch too
it's not something that's already in the game so there's no reason why they wouldn't push it back
there are not alot of ships that fit the galaxy hangar
I canât currently look it up but those dimensions mean the wolf would fit right?
apparently not
galaxy hangar is 12m wide, 16 long and 6m high
wolf is 10.5m wide, 21.5m long and 4.2m high
wolf could fit diagonally
i think the diagonal is between 19 and 20 meters
ye its 20m diagonally
WHAT! I thought it was RSI?
smh
remember though the pad in the back does not include the 2 areas if 32 scu to its sides so some larger things could fit with cargo loss
with the way they're making ships nowadays don't you worry, they'll limit the hangar door to disallow ships bigger than xxs 
its just an invis wall for everything bigger than a pisces
but the scu place is like 2.5m
you could theoratically fit the wolf
but it will be a VERY uncomfortable fit
i would rather recommend the ironclad for wolfs
it can carry like 5 relavtively comfortable
The galaxy hangar is basically just a higher carrack hangar
With carrack having a 14m wide, 21m long and 5m high hangar
Galaxy: 12m wide, 21m long, 6m high
Carrack: 14m wide, 21m long, 5m high
galaxy does have 2.5m on either side for a bit of wiggle room
where is this picture from
Thats the Perseus from the July Monthly Report
Yeah I fudged up and thought I was in Perseus Pals
but where is it from?
Monthly report
July one, i believe
Galaxy pls
as soon as the galaxy is mentioned in a monthly imma start yapping even more
galaxy đ€€
Since the Apollo series is out is the galaxy next?
Its after the perseus
So whatâs after Apollo then?
The galaxy, because the perseus is coming at least at IAE maybe citcon
Ah ok
the perseus then galaxy
Dang, I just want my galaxy 
apollo then perseus then galaxy
Ironclad needs new tech, they might drop in close proximity
because cig never drops ships without their relevant tech
Or just cuts tech that isn't ready XD rip drones
Galaxy some shiiiiit
I hope we get like a data running module. That would be cool kinda like the drake herald but for the galaxy
I don't think that's likely, especially in the near future
Bit large for data "runner"
If the galaxy gets anything data I expect more like the endeavour
i might be overdosing on copium but hear me out..
doesnt match the schematics, and its too close to the Perseus release hyping. we have claimed it
Both don't match at all. Wrong Perseus seats, no tables, side windows are incorrect. I would even say that it matches the Galaxy more, but hyping the Perseus and releasing the Galaxy wouldn't make much sense.
(although, Idris release was weird too)
Itâs the Hermes (probably)
Bro is so drugged on copium he has no idea what the Galaxy looks like
I'm addicted to copium, but that's not the topic
so Hermes would be an RSI fast heavy hauler?
Saying it's the hermes is even more ridiculous btw
its just too close to Perseus' release with a 3 man cabin as a known fact
center seat probably slides forward, and the side desks were justgiven a holo projecting arm instead of desktop
Hauling version of Apollo
Btw, the sneak peek is titled "The calm before command"
Itâs also the industrial design of the cockpit for rsi, not the military one
which made a bunch of Perseus pals think they did a Captain chair in the middle, with twin pilot seats on the side
@clear vault Wait, your name even says perszeus. Wrong Gang buddy, get out of the galaxy turf
we are allowed here buddy
Galaxy was going to be my alternate. but i think Arrastra converted me
Another one huh
yea, i liked the portable refiner thing. but Galaxy has a bit too much Jack in its jack of all trades imo =/
Arrastra is such a beautiful ship.. can't wait
yea i saw its announcement and it looked so compact, a Mole competitor. then i saw the dimensions XD
gonna continue perseus coping in perseus pals
The design is just too good. Having a crew is realistic (Idris is ridiculous) and yes it has everything. Having a ship be modular is so good because people tend to change their mind about ships every time a new gets released. So, why not have every ship option 
New mining update? Sure, use refinery.
Org battle needs medical crew, sure here you go.
Large hauling? Sure go ahead
512 cargo is unimpressive, refiner is smaller than arrastras, cant mine, base building delayed, Apollo scale up makes hospital less valuable
Jack of all trades doesnt mean master of all. Which is fine
which is what my 'little too jack in its jack of all trades' had the issue with. its just not close enough to the real entries
Well, yes but jacks can turn into kings because it isnt even released. You know how they change everything once a ship gets released into the wild. peeps complain, and changes happen 
Someday.. someday.
Perseus got S8 cannons, maybe there is hope for galaxy
it's got like the same cargo as caterpillar with a hangar, it's got more beds with a hangar and space for rover, the cargo is less than a dedicated ship of it's size but what did you expect. and medical only looks worse than apollo because of the current state of medical gameplay which is garbage
refinery was one hte key uniquenesses i was interested in
and the large base build module for contract work
the gal med is better than apollo in everyway after this not the concept release of it
apollo and gal both large
no rover vs rover and snub
32 vs 64 cargo
2 crew vs 6 crew
2 size 3 2 size 4 vs 6 size 5
2 s2 shields vs s3
and the gal med has 1 t1 2 t2 and 3t3 at the same time meaning it has the most beds joint with 2 t3 mods apollo but with more medgel in them
that's pure cope
right now galaxy is just a fatter apollo that can carry slightly more cargo and has snub and rover
but is huge target
also saying they're both large is wild work
considering one is 73x54x14 released and the other one is 110x60x22 in concept
so will probably get fatter
its not a cope its my opinion, i pledged an apollo concept of a medium evac vessel with drones and a moon pool for body retrieval, what i got was a large vessel with lackluster defences for its size, no moon pool and currently very unlikely to ever get drones that has no meant for space for any form of evac assistance.
i might as well take a taurus with a nursa, it would cost less to pledge both, be an extremely similar size, has better defences and offensive capabilities, a snub and rover bay and a tractor that could extract bodies from the ground with enough crew for a pilot gunner medic and engineer rather than 2 men running around a ship the same size.
and guess what the galaxy has those same capabilities over the apollo too.
basing your opinions on the current state of an alpha that's in development and is changing is pure copium, if we get any proper balancing or refinement of medical gameplay the taurus with a nursa will be a joke compared to an apollo
and still most of your points are either irrelevant or outright wrong, like sure the rover and snub argument is cool but you classified both as large when the galaxy is way bigger than apollo and will almost certainly grow. the 32 scu extra aint gonna make it or break it, the crew size being 6 doesnt mean anything right now, all the argument of guns and shields are also irrelevant imo because in ships like these anything that can kill you is going to kill you and the size of your shields or guns won't be the defining factor
the fact is even though the apollo sucks as it stands the galaxy med is not simply better, even if things stay this way it still is a bigger target, and if things do stay this way then the rover and snub is irrelevant too
the moment cig gets their head out of their ass and actually differentiates the bed tiers in a meaningful way the apollo will be better
I don't get it. Every single Galaxy hater here are people who stick their glizzy inside the exhaust pipes of the RSI Perseus.
Like, wtf is this. If you just hate on it and nothing else. Go to your own channel/clubhouse, imo. 
I've a Perseus and a Galaxy. I think they're both going to be really goodđ»
I'm totally fine if people like the perseus, but they can spread their giga glazing in their own clubhouse 
What are your thoughts on this breakdown?
https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1odq888/soooooo_take_a_look_at_this/
My initial thoughts but it's most likely the perseus either way.
i don't hate the galaxy, i own one and love the ship, doesn't mean i need to cope and say it's better than everything
Basing my opinions on what I know, is how you have opinions.
Both are large by cigs classification on large vessels, they are both in the band for it. One is larger than the other but their ship class is large.
Double the cargo at least as well since the med modules has storage in it's concept just an unstated amount. Which allows for double the cargo or extra parts for vehicles and food and supplies for range.
Extra crew means it can man 3 turrets have a pilot and still have an engineer and medic, the Apollo has a pilot and 1 man running round like a headless chicken.
The difference between the Apollo and galaxy shields is 4x AVG depending on chosen shields, that 4x the time to avoid turrets and gunfire. Also means if what attacks your galaxy Is going to kill you the Apollo died ages ago, at least the galaxy gives more time for help since I'm not a solo player anytime for my friends to turn up is good for me.
The galaxy med at current is better because they is nothing it can't do better than the Apollo and that's not gonna change.
The snub isn't irrelevant if your target is in a cave that the snub can enter the Apollo can't, these exist on micro tech already.
The rover helps in bad terrain and weather environments. Try and land an Apollo on the rock formations of pyro 1 if your targets there the rover will struggle enough itself.
The Apollo is not bad, it does the job of medic, but the galaxy offers way more
If the Apollo is better tell me how, actively how
can't really argue with things like
"cig says they're both large so they're both large"
"3 turrets that will never get an angle on anything somewhat maneuverable nor will they do anything to the combat ships that are slow enough to get hit by them"
"more shields because somehow running from things isn't an option and we're completely ignoring that the galaxy will fly worse than the apollo"
"the current state of a gameplay loop that just got a bandaid in an alpha that's changing month to month suits this ship better right now"
None of these are the Apollo is better,
if your running so entering NAV size means nothing cos once you hit 600+ M/S nothing can keep up to shoot you
3 turrets with no angle? They are the same angles as the paladin has, also again if running doesn't matter your in nav, but say against bunker turrets if your target goes down to a criminal bunker 3 size 5 with a size 3 shield could take em out or use the rover, an Apollo ain't taking on bunker turrets.
The state of a gameplay loop that's bandaided is a very shit summary right now, the fact is CIG in the road to 1.0 had 2 boxes for medics, missions and beacons Vs all the other loops having 5 or so boxes.
Currently as far as we know medics have missions coming which will more than likely be NPC versions of beacons which are high likely to be combative locations, which a galaxy has better offensive and defensive ability.
Outside of that info all we have concepted are drones that are no longer planned, death of a spaceman which will just promote using medics over backspacing and old concept art of prosthesis which has never been mentioned since.
Tell me something the Apollo is better at, actually better
i can't tell you anything if you're so deluded that you're not receptive to anything mate
Literally tell me a stat or activity to do with rescue is better at, all you've done is try to put the galaxy down, how about you try to promote the Apollo, what does it do better.
I'll give you two, acceleration and quick access docking port to hospital Vs the gals docking port being the top floor opposite end of medical zone
I'm trying to discuss the genuine reason you think it's better all you have done is swing insults and go that doesn't matter like a crying child who wanted a strawberry ice cream while in a tool shed
I'm telling you man.. people with "perseus" in their name are just different. There is no point arguing
We're in too deep, and too close to release
Literally just a gunship and we're in there like IT HAS TO BE 64 SCU BECASE DIVISBKE BY 8
I hope Galaxy has its potential rounded-up like Perseus's was to make it's flexibility stand out
Just go crazy in the module options
my only ask for the gal is a top defence either another turret or a pdc since theres nothing up top currently
Jail cell room for prisoner transfer, Pheonix room for luxury passenger
"If every career is a world of possibilities, a Galaxy offers every world"
I'm not joining any discussion other than that the galaxy has modules and you can pick a poisen. You need one singular ship that has it all.
Arguing about the details about a ship that is literally just a picture is pointless. In the release the cargo can be 5000 scu with 50 Tier 1/2/3 beds. We wont know, but we can appreciate the design of RSI ships and the unique aspect of being a modular ship.
Stat balancing discussion go brrrrr
Redeemer had to die so Paladin could fly
Redeemer Looks like a Trex with those little S4s though
400i in the corner after being mugged for it components wallet
S5 Redeemer was my gateway drug to loving being a a gunship pilot
Loved banking my positioning to give the boys firing arcs and watching the dakka
yessss, literally
Cutlass was my first joint. Redeemer was my first prescription XD
But we're Perseus changing again. Back to Galaxy
It does need some top defense, hoping to see 3 or 4 PDCs on it
Saying "brb, taking a piss" while the party were sitting in the turrets in a mission against other npc ships was such aura from the redeemer
Classic 
my deemer experience was hearing a bottle or tin fall out the storage and exploding, think that was its release patch
Probably just 1 max 2 PDC, lets be honest..
id take 1 or a weaker turret like 2s3
oh yeah.. i remember those times too well. "Guys, this is the redeemer, dont open the mini fridge at the bottom or we die"
yep
death by swift delivery, the nuclear bean tin
Should have shielded the mini fridge so a can of soup falling over wouldn't self destruct
Galaxy's top angle is the broadside of a barn. For sure
Its literally a mini star destroyer if you forget about the tower at the back
i can understand not wanting it to have another 2 size 5 but giving it nothing up there is suprising but then again its RSI ship that isnt a combat vessel, they all have barnside blind spots, galaxy and zeus being the top apollo and connies except the androm being the bottom
Galaxy aint getting PDC
unless CIG changes their stance
unless you talking about Perseus? then yeah, prob
I think in a old concept talk the Perseus back remote turret the dual size 3 one was to act as a PDC if un operated but that was a old transcript statement if I remember correctly so who knows
im hoping
that those 2 remote turrets act as PDC
PDC
not PDT
PDCs (Missles and light craft targetting)
but fk it i geuss if they do pdc and pdt remote turrets
Can't wait to use my Galaxy with the refinery module and a friend in a mining ship đ Just mine everything cuz you don't have to be picky anymore. Maybe even use a third pilot with a freighter. Heck, why not a Hull C even đ
I will take the refinery aswell 
He's deluded? 
nah you're right i realise it's my own fault for not believing in the fact that "bigger ship > smaller ship in every way"

y'all are weird
You dont seem to have said anything to prove this mystical point that the apollo is somehow better so why dont you back it up?
No one here is saying that bigger ship = better
The galaxy is currently a better ship than the apollo for the purpose of a medical platform beacuse of the following:
- Increased amount of medical bays and beds to allow for better triage.
- An actual way to transport paitients in an out of the ship, such as with the snub hangar and rover hangar
- More armoured, and turrets wise a higher amount and larger gun capability
- Ability to carry smaller medical ships of its own in order to land or reach places the galaxy may not be able to reach
Until engineering is in place, which at that point any conversation we are having will likely be irrelevant due to huge changes we are not aware of.
The galaxy (at this current point of concept) is a far better ship than the apollo.
Dont get me wrong, the apollo will be a better budget ship, as it is 260usd compared to the galaxys 380+100 for the ship and module i belive. But in side to side comparison its not close
Spitting facts upon facts, amen
diffrences aside (perseus man to galaxy man) both are awesome :)
gunna pick up a galaxy at iae
if its on warbond or on sale
where have i said this mystical point of apollo is better than galaxy
i haven't said that, i just said that as it stands galaxy is just a fatter apollo so it's slower and a bigger target for having a snub and rover
which is literally what it is until cig makes changes to medical gameplay
and all your points are irrelevant in the current state of the game unless you're gonna run you galaxy medical in vhrt's or something or want to roleplay
howcome
want to elaborate?
one of those is going to win a fight against a constellation, the other isnt
one of those is useful for org v org, the other is a sitting duck in combat
increased amount of medical bays is literally irrelevant in the game right now, having an "actual way" to transport patients isn't really a thing as there's no downside to just tractoring them in, armour is irrelevant and "more guns" isn't really a major point on a ship like the galaxy (6 s5's that require literally 4 people to operate when you can have 4 corsairs or literally anything else?) ability to carry ships to reach places the galaxy can't sure is a point but if the ship isn't 110m in the first place maybe you could've just landed there?
Your now just moving away from your own argument because you know your incorrect?
armour is in no way ireleveant lmao, its what makes you survie or die. Guns are what win you fights.
Im not here to debate on the purpose of multicrew. We are talking about ship v ship.
if you had ever been in a large org op, you would understand the importance of recovery vessles and triage, especially with medgels implementation and the issues only 1 bed can bring with having multiple people die.
also my opinion has been that apollo galaxy and endeavor all have their own roles, i was simply stating that the galaxy has downsides compared to the apollo after someone said galaxy is just better than the apollo in every way, which it really isn't and won't be ever, they're different ships
ok that proves you haven't read half the things i wrote
emphasis on "current state of the game"
how is armor relevant in the current state of the game, tell me
one has more hull hp than the other
one can survive more shots therefore?
Im not here to say the apollo is bad
you think the apollo has a higher hull hp than the galaxy
ye that 10k will surely be the defining factor
what?
your pulling numbers out your ass
when the fuck did i say that 
i have no clue about the hull hp of the galaxy, nobody does, it's not released, what?
triage is like 110k and medivac is like 120k at least last i checked
both you and i, wether you like or or not both know that the galaxy will have a higher hull hp
signifcantly so
so that is how armour matters?
yeah and you know what? it compensates for that by being a way bigger and slower target
lots of beds will only matter if there is 'evac me and my 10 friends who all got shot' or if the treating time ends up multiple minutes
so in a fully realised game where medical is balancing, almost like that's been my stance this entire time
i don't get it, i love the galaxy and have one, how do so many people have a problem with me saying that the galaxy med isn't just simply better than the apollo 
Im starting to get confused. mabye you think everyone you talk to is deulsional because you dont know how to phrase your point
if you compare ship v ship. the galaxy is better than the apollo medical. no external factors
no
they are two ships of different roles and different strenghts and weaknesses
what you're saying is the hornet is better than the perseus
no it's not, and it's not the other way around either, sure in essence they both have guns that shoot things but the purposes of them and the use cases are so vastly different that they're not comparable
im not arguing what is better for daily driving or for multirole
i am saying
the galaxy
is better than the apollo
for medical gameplay
yeah i get what you're saying and no you're still wrong
more capability is not simply better than less, since there's tradeoffs that come with the more capability
that's like saying the perseus is better than hornet period for combat gameplay
or saying the reclaimer is better than vulture for salvage
or prospector better than orion for mining
you see how that's silly?
yeah that's what you're saying just applied to literally any other two ships
to every other gameloop
you're saying that one ship with more capability and tradeoffs is better than the other in the same gameplay loop, how does it not apply to any other loop 
reclaimer is a simply more capable ship than the vulture, how is it simply not better than the vulture?
a crewed orion beats a prospector ect ect ect
no shit?
but they apply to both
and the benefits of a galaxy outweigh the apollos, even with tradeoffs.
unless you must somehow dumb everything down to x is better than y it's silly to say that one ship is simply better than the other because there's nuance
no
lmao
Take 3 people
tell that to a player who doesn't make enough money to cover the running costs of the galaxy or doesn't have enough crew to operate it or just wants to do bunkers and doesn't want to deal with a huge ship
Put them in each ship
if you want to compare x ship ran in ideal conditions and y ship ran in ideal conditions that's just terrible reasoning because obviously an entire org running an orion with supply lines so nobody can mess with a loot pinata that's the orion will outperform a dude in a prospector
like yeah no shit hiring an entire software company will outperform hiring a single freelance software dev
ok why don't we take 1 person and put them in each ship
the fact is that the apollo is a ship that can be operated by very few crew, that can carry out the work of being a small-scale emergency hospital but is mainly a QRF hospital or very good ambulance/CSAR machine. galaxy is a hospital that needs more crew than an apollo and you're going to struggle running CSAR or QRF hospital in a hot zone, especially with small crews and no outside combat support
- running costs
it's like comparing hospitals to ambulances and saying hospitals are better than ambulances. that's simply not true, because while hospitals are way more capable than ambulances, the ambulance has the advantage of being a box of half-decent medical equipment on wheels. they're two different things
Looks like one of these vending machines where the chocolate bars always get stuck.
well there goes my galaxy... have fun perseus people... 
"error: missile jam"
"please carefully dislodge missile with a stick"
just noticed this wasnt leak discussion
im sorry galaxy people
so then why take an apollo over a medipin or pisces, less crew needs, less costs to run.
you've moved your goal posts 3 times now
first it was you telling me im wrong and that the apollo is better than the galaxy cos the galaxy is "a fatter apollo" a "huge target".
then said that cargo capacity and rover and snub carry are irrelevant in medical which is bull crap through and through. when pledge gear v0 ends we wont spawn with shit so medics who regen for parties near new gear on board on top of medgel on top of everything else ships will need like repair materials, components and fuses. as well as weather and gravity and environments are meant to make bigger ships struggle so as i said try and land an apollo in pyro 1 jagged peaks or microtechs ship caves. to which yuo had no response and just call me deluded.
then changed it to when "medic gameplay is balanced" which doesn't change anything i said as medically the galaxy has the same if not better medical bed access.
then said they're not both large which by cigs classification they are, just cos one is larger than the other deosnt mean the other isnt, a freighter and a cruiseliner are large, odds are the cruiseliner is larger than the freighter though.
i asked you to tell me how the apollo was better and gave you 2, quick access port and acceleration. you then just stopped responding.
now your saying my argument was bigger ship > smaller ship which is how idiots try to belittle arguments that's a falsification of what i said.
is a perseus better than a hornet in fighting is a depends. is it big ship fight or fighter fight.
cos a hornet aint gonna hurt a polaris but can hit a swarm hard in the right hands and vice versa for the perseus.
i said the galaxy med is a better medical ship which thats my opinion.
now your moved the goal posts to say you never said the apollo was better which you did in your response about when "medic gameplay changes"
then said that the gal med is irrelevant right now when earlier you were arguing future changes make it irrelevant. both are wrong, right now if it dropped in game the apollo vs gal of getting a med beacon in a bunker the main event mission if the turrets are active the apollo medic has to run 2km to get in an res them the gal could take the turrets out or land 2km away and rover it.
as for the future neither of us can speak of it because neither of us knows whats coming.
then you change your point from costs to run a galaxy vs an apollo to if you have 6 srew run a bunch of corsairs with your apollo so i can no longer take you seesaw opinion seriously. you are changing the narrative of my points to bullshit someone else, constantly changing to the point you making, belittling your own argument
"also my opinion has been that apollo galaxy and endeavor all have their own roles, i was simply stating that the galaxy has downsides compared to the apollo after someone said galaxy is just better than the apollo in every way, which it really isn't "
tell me then how the apollo is better, based on what we know not what your guessing as a medical ship.
when the fuck did i say that the apollo is better than the galaxy explicitly
cuz i haven't said that and that's never been my opinion 
yall are still at this?
Galaxy aint explicitley better, galaxy will be better for some, apollo better for others
exactly what i'm saying
he seems to think that i claim that the apollo is better and also he seems to think that the galaxy is just better in every way
both of those are not true so he's arguing with his own thoughts
for me, the galaxy will be better as i am a multi-crew player. For others the apollo may be the best option
for your questions
you take an apollo when you need a quick field hospital or very capable ambulance. it's not sustainable but you can treat a few heavily injured people right over there whereas medipin and pisces isn't able to carry a bunch of medgel or a t1 bed. the benefit of the galaxy over the apollo is that it can sustain the hospital for a longer time but as i said multiple times, emphasis on the AS IT IS IN THE CURRENT STATE OF THE GAME that is an irrelevant fact, as the amount of medgel you can carry and the beds you can have on the apollo is sufficient for anyone and everyone but an org. unless you really want that snub and rover for some reason.
when medic gameplay is balanced changes a lot of things actually because more capability does not mean a better ship instantly. just like you said it depends if a perseus is better than a hornet depends on the situation, galaxy vs apollo depends on the goddamn situation. the galaxy is a more capable ship but if there's only a singular person who wants to deal with the medical ship in your group then the galaxy is going to be a wrong choice because that person is going to struggle to extract any use out of that ship other than flying it to places because of how huge it is and when things like engineering come online it'll be even worse, whereas the apollo is a much smaller ship so easier to handle by a single person.
i don't get how i'm "belittling my own argument" by saying that 4 people in dedicated combat ships is a better choice than 4 people in a galaxy doing combat? that's been my opinion this whole time that the galaxy will suck for combat.
i've told you many times how the apollo is better, i'll restate it once more. when you have a crew of 1-2 you're better off having the apollo because the galaxy will be handicapped by the amount of people it has to operate it. the galaxy is a way bigger target so detectable way easier, it will be slower so some ships that will be able to catch up to the galaxy and destroy it's comps before it can run away will not be able to do that to the apollo, and your running costs will be way cheaper. the tradeoff is that once medical gameplay is fleshed out you will need more beds, etc. and that's where the galaxy med will come in. larger player groups will run a galaxy but if you're just a few dudes running around the galaxy will handicap you and the apollo is just a better fit
finally an actual response other than calling me deluded
i want to emphasize that more capability does not instantly make a ship better than the ship that it's getting compared to. it's a different scale and even though they are both medical ships if you can even understand a slight bit of nuance you can clearly see that they are intended for different roles and group sizes
i mean you just won't let it go and keep typing paragraphs to me mate
you are still deluded imo
also sure i will fix my "idiotic" statement that dumbs down your argument to "bigger ship > smaller ship"
"bigger and more capable ship > smaller and less capable ship in every situation because tradeoffs and nuances doesn't exist"
how do you guys find that much time to write all that
i type fast
i had a dream last night that the galaxy turned into a capital ship and was coming out in a month
Take a break from sc man
once in a dream i saw the creator of the rsi galaxy and i gave him a forehead kiss in appreciation because of how great those png's were, but even by doing that he didnt tell me the release date


Finally picking up my galaxy today :))
The instant it hits the pledge store I;m grabbing
i hope we get a salvation cargo variant, under slung cargo like auroras so we can shove it in the back of the gal (all hopium)
Imagine how expensive they will be when the price goes up xD
But.. what if you need it someday?
then you can aUEC buy them... probaly




)