#Perseus Pals
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
The ironclad is really really weird
Anyways
I wonder what the rules of engagement for a Perseus to kill a hammerhead with "ease" is supposed to be
Does Perseus try to broadside and engage from 5km? Because if the Perseus releases slow as fuck without the HP, those turrets on hammer will close the gap pretty quick
Honestly, I think nose on and staying at range is what itâll do best
I doubt the turrets can move much to the left and right
Once Armour is better realized, the anti fighter turrets in the Hammerhead will barely scratch Percy
It's be tempted to close in to distract it from the fighters
Even without armor mechanics I think itâll be the strongest sub-cap in the game, and with armor itâs gonna be so much better, as anything that isnât shooting at least s5 probably wonât do much
True true
Perseus Cockpit Cope
wtf!! is that real or nah @humble anvil
its a real image... but its not the perseus.
tbh tho
its strangely super close to what the perseus will be
you can even see like where the big ol s7 turret will go, and then you got little black boxes on the front sides as well. perfect location for some PDC
aslong the perseus didn't grew 10-20 meters as leaked
since then the bridge would be more likely at the start of the "hammerhead slit" instead of the upper turret
i dont want to poop on anyone wants or dreams for the ship
but idk about you Ravit. the smaller and more compact the better
well, yes, ofc lol
unless bigger means more cargo or and medbay, then i prefer that :p
if its not uncluded and it just becomes bigger then smaller is better ofc
smaller target, better manouvability (hopefully) and less pricy
still funny hammerhead is so huge compared to it, yet almost zero usefull interior xDD
i ran the interior of the hammerhead, i hated it
well its 80% hallway
I had somewhere a picture I made with a internal layout, how i would have made the interior layout of the Hammerhead
it had armory, 2 torpedo/rocket bays additionally
ofc removed the idiot slit too
yes Ravit, keep talking about ships yessss (watching invincible rn, but i enjoy a good talky)
In short: one hallway in the middle from front to end of the ship, turrets connected via X hallway section, and rooms left and right to the hallway
front had 2 torpedo rooms/missile rooms where the current hallways are
find it xddd
would have to remake it probably because i deleted it prob
not like it would take long
gonna remake it real quick
It was something like that (remade it real quick)
elevator is exit + second floor
Lol i gotta run throu\gh the interior again
so mine adds basically 4 rooms
and would move the captain quarthers to upper floor
Technically the missile rooms could also be modular rooms
like medbay, extra cargo, or missile
yeah if the added mass to the middle of the ship
singular hallway with branches would been nice
but thankfully, we'll have perseus soon
its just way more space efficient
but they blocked that by... well the fucking slit xd
oh yeah, also because the hallway would block access to the upper turret, that would be also moved to upper floor
its just funny to me, the hammerhead could've been such a great ship with just a "normal" interior layout xd
could've been a very great 4+player ship

idc, perseus will do the same job, but only needing 2 crew as skeleton crew
even better than needing at least 4 to be efficient
yuppppp!! Perseus will pop connies and above like balloons
hopefully
ERT will be so fucking easy
also @sullen seal as I said, the perseus club room 
noice
more Dakka !
also, Hammerhead interior fix 

I made the crusader one back then
also things you may have missed: Caterpillar can now lower its cargo lifts on the side of the pods, and first alien "NPC" in SC (4.1 PTU)
- probably valakkar for 4.1
sand worm đȘ± yay
next event ?
so we will hunt the valakhar ?
yep
noice
and can loot him then, and trade the stuff for ships
or special weapons
like, bone skin weapons
all ships are btw with military components
so its basically the PvE way to get military components (?)

Well, we first need explosive ammo, and then... then we can imagine it
I don't think there was explosive ammo planned
Guess the only thing that got area damage was plasma
High explosive was planned I believe
Along with Flak ammo which was on the roadmap last year
with a Star lancer TAC 
yeah thats already known for like 4 years

Literally told you i will put plasma in my buttom turret because of splash damage, or incendiary depending on if i do ground target missions or nah
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/en/comm-link/engineering/17915-Q-A-RSI-Perseus
HE was mentioned in the Q&A question, no need to rule it out
Roberts Space Industries is the official go-to website for all news about Star Citizen and Squadron 42. It also hosts the online store for game items and merch, as well as all the community tools used by our fans.
Q&A isn't really a source for that tho
Im just suggesting yeesh
Why the fuck would the Perseus need incendiary ammo
HE makes much more sense
Against bigger targets
just spreading fire in their enterior just everywhere, if you cannot kill it by pure firepower, kill it slowly by killing it from the inside
Okay then tell me where HE doesnât fall into the useful category here
Every cannon for the last 100 years has had high explosive and armor piercing ammo
never said its not useful, i just say that HE doesn't exist and isn't planned xD
I mean you donât know that
Otherwise it would be here
yeah, thats what the current normal ballistic ammunition does
so no need for HE
Aslong the bullet is big enough
A high explosive for a light target is better
Maybe thatâs the flak ammo
But if I use my Polaris s6 that explosion radius is ass, not useful
But HE is definitely useful
Ground targets for one
Ground targets Plasma would be better^^
And what makes you say that
tbf, the polaris s6 isn't exactly AMAZING
3,300 DPS between 2 guns
Well S7 isnât exactly a massive jump either
it's a very nerfed gun imo
especially with it being purely ballistic
it is though, S7 is the first anti-cap gun, s6 is an intermediate
But until we see stats who knows if itâs gonna be effective
ofc, perseus won't survive against caps
but the gun itself is designed for armor penetration
Since itâs bespoke hopefully it will perform enough better to make a meaningful difference
Well, yes but since there is no other that actually focuses on ground combat, plasma is the only way to go for that ^^
overall though, my point was that the polaris s6 is VERY nerfed and isn't really performing as it should
Yeah I mean the S6 has 92 armor pen already, which is amazing
2x bespoke ballistic s6's should not deal nearly 1,500 less DPS than a single ares ion gun
pretty sure the polaris only got the upgun from S5 to S6 for the front thing, because of ships like the perseus
so its not that easy to hug the polaris and it could take out a single perseus
nah, I think it's because it was an old concept. When the polaris was made s5 was considered anti cap, and the polaris also grew by nearly 60 meters
i mean it was also supposed to be a sub cap too not a cap 
any design before 2020 was terribly made and is pretty much a collection of what 5 drunk dudes can do
I think they made it in mind with maelstrom and engineering in mind, since the armor pen is so high, and released right before engineering was supposed to come out for 4.0
because no pre-2020 design survives the active production stage without pretty major changes
lol Perseus finna bout to upscale to S8 or get all of its PDC and 2x 2xS4 turrets
or an artifical buff to the S7 Guns
it'll stay at s7 because it shouldn't be a major threat to a crewed capital
currently the perseus will be a major threat to someone trying to solo or due a capital like the polaris, but otherwise shouldn't the end of them instantly
atleast temporarily
pretty sure it will get either way an artifical buff for the S7
compared to the ares at least
the only good thing about bespoke is that it can be buffed for no reason
without needing to balance around the entire gun class
so they'll change it depending on needs
Perseus is a threat to pretty much everything rn ingame
just like the polaris is rn
at least if its crewed
well we only have 1 military capital ship, and the perseus is designed to munch on sub-caps for breakfast
really only the polaris is gonna be a threat, the 890 and reclaimer, while being capital, are gonna die in seconds 
because assuming the s7 has the same alpha as the ion (5k), that's 20k alpha
true, god I hate watching my shields go down when fighting a HH 
will be more alpha dmg btw
because ion is laser, perseus is ballistic
yeah, I'm just using the ares as a basepoint, since they're the same manufacturer and size
not same manufacture xD
the ares was always gonna be worse
RSI / crusader
Luckily I could see a Perseus taking out a hammerhead, without even using the guns. The S5 torps could fuck it up good
same gun manufacturer
Obviously, but it "could" be a threat
If youâre a bad Perseus pilot, then probably lol
The other stuff we got rn besides torpedo stuff and polaris, aren't even a threat at all
If you have no PDCâs, the Polaris is a threat
meh, I doubt. The s5 torps are useless outside of PVE, and even then, the damage and speed of them is quite meh
seen enough bad hammerhead pilots so 
I would have liked for the perseus to have s9 launchers with like 4 torps total than a bunch of s5's
depends which torps you use
EM torps aka Seeker hit pretty often
heavy fighters are borked
Hammerhead canât outrun a s5 trip
even players
ik, but the slower the torp, the easier it is for a HH gunner to shoot it down
more time to as well
is it? I thought it was the slowest?
no
one sec
bigger = slower
am I schizoing
smaller = faster
S10 (polaris) is the slowest
at least till we get the S12 torps of the javelin
javelin torps are gonna 1 shot a polaris lmao
I still find it funny how in the squadron 42 video last year they showed the javelin dumping two of those into a ship smaller than an idris 
at point blank range
well it was the "fuck you in particular" range
yet when I torp someone 100 meters away I pay a 100k repair bill on my polaris 
I had a lovely crew member once that decided to point blank a 400i with 2 of them
oh damn
I thought it was that s5's were slow as shit, s9 were fast, and polaris (s10) were slow as shit
Yeah you ainât catching a S5 torp, it catches you
they were but that is super old info
also pretty sure there is something fucked up on erkul
pretty sure the S5 torp had 51K dmg
not 17K
They used to be 180m/s
was that during the PTU where they said fuck it, or before it?
before the great torp death PTU build
only time I remember is from over a year ago where they decided to make every torp practically useless
so far ik currently S5 torps are the only torps that can slide through PDC defence
because they're too fast
Hmmm are you sure it's a Torp?
I know of S5 Scim missles
Vanguard Harbringer Wiki
This game has really weird ways of classifying stuff
1-4 is missile
5-12 torp
1-6 subcap
7-10 anti-cap

There is no middle ground in actual classification
hmm okay

I see
well polaris is also considered capital, while its technically in naval combat stuff a corvette
and javelin just a destroyer
guess they classify it like "can it run on itsself for a very long time" = cap
yk she doesn't know xd
i know
She knows but she also doesnât want a call from Jared or chris*
But hey, Perseus info dump confirmed for ILW, right???
we want perseus release ILW not info dump 
It will release, but theyâll give us an info dump right at the start
At the start weâll get to tour the outside and look at other sales
And then one of the later days they just release it to PTU
I hope not, that'd mean it would be delayed for a while like the Vulture was =x
True 
We still have ISC this coming week though
Maybe theyâll show us some more since they teased it last ISC
teasing means nothing
remember the BMM? or kraken?
The BMM was a lie, it doesnât exist

And the kraken probably is one of the closer ships imo
Or even just the STY, they teased that for a year since it got pushed back from it's intended Alien Week launch window
People are gonna hold the BMM like stocks and when they finally release it people are gonna profit 
$300 ship that will be worth $1000
Ofc
In 10 years
all i know is with the new concepts etc, is that we will get some sub 100$ warbonds soon tm
gotta build an Arrastra before she's released
i cant wait untill i can go
yummy delicious Ursa on the Persy
the new hathor laser event looks fun
but its a bit stupid imo, because of the T0 item recovery
dudes just running it with zero fear, respawnining in picses
?
4.1 Hathor Orbital Laser Full Run and Explained | Insanely Awesome | Star Citizen
check out CitizenSpooner's point of view here
https://youtu.be/Y_zTv2Mm9XU?si=FjZeOkO0aCQFuiB8
music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzxHIEkwBziOzs8LI_2qJnw/join
Support Us Here
https://...
yeah i mean that will change so far ik with T1
otherwise any fps mission would be too easy
all that, just for a hole in the ground? .-. xd
average SC behaviour
anyways
yeah all that for a hole in the ground... hope in their update they put some good ass hand mineables in there
i mean they needed what?
a group of 20
40 min with infinite respawn, + non pvp + like 10 people
yeah
that sounds like way too much effort xD
yeah. As a casual, i do a few bunkers and get off. I definitely do not want to go through the effort of trying to join a group of people to make a laser go pewpew
i mean, i'll consider if its new merc missions etc
and its a chain tiered quest or something but
why would i participate if the rewards are shit, and it takes too much effort
fun? Shit SC is torture, that entire loop isnt fun.
More fun pulling stuff out of red boxes and dive bombing random ships in space for weevil eggs
lol what is happening
engines still on?
no lol, it somehow didnt go down like it got caught by the hanger
then the doors closed on it, it was stuck between the doors, and eventually it dissapeared and stored
the fuck 
every time I try to lower it with the ship being at a weird angle, it just disappears
guess you will have to claim it
oh yeah no worries i put claim on it and leaving for the night
i wanted to put the nursa in it.
Just hope the percy doesn't do shit like that since its prob like 15x heavier
but knowing CIG, it will xd
that i can live with
what i cant live with is them not having automated blades to the turrets on release.
or the additional pdc
idm waiting for the actual feature to come in.. but then its a question of. to blade or not to blade
this is genuinely so dumb.
Expedition . Exploration .....
Can it dock or must it land?
Tbf, the Taurus is a medium freight and is the same story
CIG for whatever reason refuses to balance the Corsair and Taurus
Haiii!
its like they're scared to make combat ships COMBAT ships
but have severe outliers like the Corsair and Taurus
I literally fear a Connie more than anything else specifically because itâs way too agile for its size, and it melts shields
wait till you fight a hammerhead xd
True, only good thing about a HH is the fact itâs easy to run circles around
Otherwise itâs a pain when it lights you up
Thatâs why I usually just run ERTâs with an eclipse 
I donât usually care about cargo (cause itâs usually shit), so I just go up and yeet a torp
if you do them in pyro they don't even have cargo 
With the Perseus you can do both đ
well, yes
Honestly, you could probably get away with 1 gunner if the remote turrets will be automated as the concept said
Cause the bottom turret is questionable 
was my plan either way to duo that thing
The biggest crew Iâll ever put on mine is 3 people, I donât want to fit an entire party in a single ship
Depending how they do it
We may be able to solo perseus in time
Ai blade and ai remote gunner
Sure not entirely effective but not reliant on others
And by that time armor will be in so half the problems in the game disappear because you're flying a heavy tank
Ye with your tears knowing AI Crew etc will be a long way if cig keeps that slow speed 
They have it with PDC but we'll find out with Perseus
We donât need AI crew, and thatâs not even on the 1.0 roadmap
Theyâll add blades, but thatâs more of a matter of balancing
They could do it now, since server meshing was the biggest thing holding it up (because server performance wouldnât handle so many things shooting/working on their own)
But they ainât gonna do that without making it somewhat balanced
See I see a problem with giving blades to certain newer ships, it's a bit unfair.b
Probably not until engineering at least because we need them to model how blades take up a computer slot
But they're military ships so should be fine
In the past they stated youâll be able to blade 4 out of 6 turrets on the hammerhead
Oh damn wtf
They can nerf it for no reason too
Yeah, but imo making them use a ton of power is already a pretty fair nerf
I foresee them making the guns with huge bloom so they're inaccurate as fuck so they can't hit light fighters lol
Itâs already hard enough for larger ships to balance power pips, so if itâs like coolers, where it takes a shit ton of pips to work, then having 2-3 of them will cost a lot of shield and engine pips
What does cooling work tho
Wdym
If youâre asking what it does, pretty sure reducing IR signature is all (will change with engineering ofc)
Polaris with a cooler off has its signature pretty much double
I see
Ship (with engineering) without coolers = let it burn let it buuuurn
Madman while being literally on fire
Pretty sure uncooled components will misfire and may cause fires
I do hope they get life support and ship fires in with engineering, itâll make it more engaging other than playing Tetris with a screen
Yeah, probably their intention, since other than combat there wouldnât really be a way for it to happen
Other than the pyro solar flares
And wear degrading
My ships donât last long enough to get wear and tear 
I actually donât think Iâve ever had one of my ships survive long enough to have physically visible wear

And Iâve only ever seen it posted so far on the vulture I believe
Vulture with wear and tear is nice though
Had it on any ship i used for the hauling Priority mission
Jesus Christ autocorrect is fighting me
Every update I swear it keeps trying to autocorrect words that are grammatically correct 

Imo shorten it by 15 seconds
jsut the end? would be somewhat boring
wh... what
?
MAYBE PERSEUS PAINT
Just not in game because it comes out 4.1.1
Not able to be datamined
Kraken enters chat*
Plus they're slowing all the heavy fighters down so persy can hit them
You think I'm joking?
Easy Yeet
We need to get through St Patrick's Day sales before we can even consider persy for leaks
They know people want it
Wait
Holy fuck ILW is 2 months away

Brother we must stand strong
I finished mine, almost 50% cheaper
đ 
You are HER

Bris. I'm genuinely upset, I looked at your banner and I'm happy again

Comfy times every time
Iris with their 78% off Perseus. That goes crazy
Huzzah!
Mine was full price. CCUs too complicated.
I at least CCU'd my perseus, my polaris on the other hand, I panic bought because it was right before the price increase 
I hate that I paid full price, but oh well, I've spent more money on other games
Believe in Wednesday 
im in the future rn, its monday for me, gotta wait till friday for the ISC
Oh, thatâs too much for me man 
đ
they did the same thing for polaris and only had the exterior at the showroom for ILW
i hope percy drops ilw but theres a chance it doesnt
have faith brother
the Polaris wasnt completed on time due to reconcepting and an internal layout overhaul, the Perseus has what?
also needs a internal layout overhaul and a "ammo feature"
i dont see why the Perseus would need an overhaul, let alone for the ammo feature either
Perseus is getting dropped on spooky season cause those guns are ghastly
I'll see myself out 
gu
I could be wrong but I remember that the original design got a ramp instead of a bay and they want it to have a rover bay.
they had already got an overhaul during its early stages, there is no ramp anymore
but were fighters not supposed to be good against percy? xd

Get rid of the patch above the airlock and turn it into a nose art with nameplate. Put painted on ears behind the cockpit on either side. Would.
NEED
THIS SHIP HAS A AIRLOCK?????
I love paints with colour gradients
I didn't knew it until I did this
now I want 

On the port side (left) of the ship, under where the logo is on the custom paint above
There isnt one on the starboard side, so only need to worry about docking to one side
I remember it now
Theyre also apparently putting a gunrack and suitblocker next to it too
Yup, just a blank wall, probably a possible place where the reload system will be
As far as we know atleast
In terms of a blank wall, not the reloading
the speed of the fighters doesnt matter that much
we still have to see the rotation speed of the turrets since those are supposedly slow to move
so even with the slower fighters they could still be too fast to track with the percy guns
Vaugh missions will be so much fun
âTry to soft death it!â 
Vaughn missions for slam?
Sex eggs
Hm
Hard kill kills the cargo?
Well anyways
Could probably even solo lol. Go get into the turret rq, and let PDC/PDT do some stuff
Snipe ships from 10k away
As they close in
The bottom turret is.. IS good enough
Which is elevator down and 1 room back. And you're in the turret
Not all of it, but most of it yeah, and it makes it really hard to get it out sometimes
Hm alright
would PDCs continue fireing if the target is soft dead
Tomorrow 
mhmm?
Today we get roadmap update and Stella fortuna
Tomorrow (Thursday) we get ISC
Please spicy News 
Perseus in the hathor trailer
wut
They're bringing the narrative team to talk about the upcoming station event and mining narrative
And it's kind of a war zone so maybe we'll see another Perseus tease
Maybe get a a quick 1 second broad side of the Perseus doing like an AC-130 run
There is the alien as well
I thought ISC is gonna be about mocap?
RSI Pussies
Fr
Only a matter of time before they put a full on fur suit in the game
Ya think with furries running the IT Department... That some gooner would figure out how to pressurize the fur suit
The only armor Set i would actually buy 
Cargo bay looks tiny when you see it like that
Forgot the other one lmao
The cargo space may only support 50 on a grid, but it will have side space unless they compact the fudge out of it
Ez 100 SCU
Yah think . Taurus n Andromeda, fit an ursa just like the Perseus I'm sure , and Perseus will be much longer
Actually
Nvm interior is a little longer than interior of Connie. Not by much
Ez 100
Oooh, so thats how they wanted lower turret. I suppose it couldve worked
Wow, they moved the turret quite far back for the final design
Why not just have a polaris ramp but only on the side opposite the airlock?
I like the newer design without a ramp tbh. Cargo/Vehicle elevator is clean, it has a crew elevator that goes to the ground and to every level, and still has side airlocks
why does this picture show the docking port as being under the cargo/vehicle deck?
did they change the design some?
In this episode, we get blown away by the new RSI Perseus and its giant guns, then we see what's up with the cool new tractor beam attachment for your Multitool.
Roberts Space Industries is a spacecraft manufacturer within the persistent-world game "Star Citizen" and its companion single-player spa...
o I see, I thought it was perfectly in line
It went through like, 3 redesigns before it was even sold as a concept. They also arbitrarily added the two extra crew, as said in that video
I just realized how much better the tractor beam used to be lmao
damn, give us the 2020 one
it's so much more responsive
You will buy the atlas
maxlift is still better than that for me 
Tomorrow

Guys would u suggest that I upgrade my Carrack to Perseus now and get a loaner or keep using the carrack?
I'd always recommend flying the ship yourself before committing a chain
Buy the upgrade, hold on to it, melt the upgrade if you donât want it or change your mind
You donât have to apply the upgrade right away
Ah wait, you wonât be able to get an upgrade without gray market
And gray market value is gonna be lower if you melt 
If they don't already have the CCU, they can just hold off for a bit. We might have a last chance sale on it. Dunno if we'll see a return of the -$60 WB offer from ILW & IAE 2954 though.
Perseus confirmed to have an Air Oven. 
Hopefully itâs similar to the Polaris, one last âget it now before the price increaseâ type thing
But not like the Polaris' "OH SHIT WE DIDN'T FINSH IT IN TIME HERE TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND SEE U AT IAE" type thing.......

was $458 after taxes for an RTX 3080 from a 3rd party amazon seller with decent reviews worth the gamble? @agile tinsel
yeah, just make sure you take a video of opening it
that's what I would always do for 3rd party purchases
if there's an issue you just give amazon the video and card back and get your money lol
its not sold by amazon, but i reckon if its fucked
amazon will still fight for me
otherwise amex will lol
yeah lol
looks like its a reasonable upgrade
im coming from a 2070 super
lol nvm, i wasnt expecting the amount of TDP

and its a 12 pin lol. im glad i saw it before it shipped
me who moved from a RTX 2060 to an 4080 OC
absolute W
Ravit ive been on the fence for a hot minute since my gpu is the 'bottle neck' of my system
but eeee
well good 4000 series are either sold out or extremely expensive rn xd
happy I purchased the 4080 just weeks before of the price increase
payed 1100⏠now it costs 2000-3000âŹ
Hey Ravit.
Why not sponsoring your Perseus friend a better PC 
oh shiitt hold up
i mean dont because
rules
Ships and Vehicles
⣠Modified several ships to behave as if the turrets are slaved by default
⊠Reclaimer = 2x front side turret
⊠Carrack = Top remote turret
⊠Valkyrie = Wing Guns
⊠Raft = Remote Turret
⊠Starlifter = Chin Turret
⣠Further Landing Gear re-tuning for Nomad, Blade, Glaive, and Talon ships
⣠Removed 300i cargo railing to allow for better cargo gameplay
So much pog
This is a nice quality of life for these ships, but could mean other ships get the same kind of "slave"
Perseus Top turret Slave? (S3/4)
would love if it's really "automated" to deal with small ships
Reclaimer: 4X S3
Carrack: 2X S4
Valkyrie: 2X S4
Raft: 2X S3
Starlifter: 2X S4
Hope it's automated by default
If it comes out with zero slave or automation . That's some bullshit
đ€
Perseus all turrets slaved!?!

I think it's very possible that the top turret will be slaved to the pilot not the size 7 Cannon
TBH would rather it be automated by default unless manned like the brochure says

The top turret S7 TOTALLY COULD
it's aligned with the cockpit. Would be SICK if they do
But reloading. So don't think it'll happen
Tbh I kinda have a feeling since the leaks saying the remote turrets were up gunned to size 4 and added 4 pdc is away for them to get away from giving us a bladed size 3 turret cause if they give it pdc then technically it has automated defense thatâs smaller then having size 3, and to make up for taking away bladed remote they upped it to size 4
Essentially giving us 4 size 1 pdc instead of 2 dual barrel size 3 bladed remote turrets and make us happy by upping the size 3 to 4 but removing the blade is my thought process which also allows them to hold off on making ai blades cause if Perseus gets it everyone gonna be like okay when is every other ship gonna get blade slots put into their turrets
perseus time
that's a very good name sir
I hope them testing out slaved turrets is a sing for them to release perseus soon
i hope it is them testing tech for the Perseus
ISC later eh?
Couple hours yeah
its about mocap stuff isnt it?
YE
Mocap Perseus reloading @crystal sleet
thatd be a beautiful teaser
PLSPLSPLSPLS
Perseus name tokens when?
Why??
I disagree. I am not in fact happy.
i mean tbh if true its probably for the bette, if the size 3's would essentially fill the role of pdc they would run out of ammo fast since they are ballistics and if true giving 4 pdc would mean 4 different targets could be shot at plus no need to worry about ammo ontop of the dual size 3 becoming dual size 4
uggggg
Ok but now all the guns can't shoot in the same direction. The superfiring arrangement was great. Not only that but they were also very capable of being minimally crewed where as now it will require more crew.
U too
4.1 PTU Ships ramming Polaris - Ramming fixed?
PayPal donations: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=NYKZER78YAXN2
#starcitizen #spacesim #Sciencefiction
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OJXg7MQsG_IVTPsmlmZYaxEPK4n4iqnhQx4oigIlJHg/edit#gid=1200824202
Erkul's DPS Calculator: https://www.erkul.games/calculator
Olakeen's Ship P...
THIS IS AWESOME
Perseus is going to be king of ramming
I mean all the guns couldnât fire the same direction in the first place the dual barrel 3 on bottom was tucked up between the engines facing rear, and ships like carrack getting top remote turret slaved to pilot Perseus might get same treatment
Plus if this is cigâs attempt to avoid giving us ai blades doesnât mean they wonât get bladed in the future when blades do come plus if true we still get 4 pdc that can target 4 different targets at a time if true and donât have to worry about ammo for them since they lasers
We do in fact need blades.
I wonder how computer's gonna come into play
Perseus has 2 medium computers
If that means one for each blades, would PDCs count in as well?
Pdcs dont count, since they are an integrated part of the ship
If i remember correctly medium computers have 2 blade slots
Oops sorry for double ping
Cause the polaris has accessable computer in the bridge which are mediums and there are 2 slots in each computer, and they said the hammerhead can blade 4 of its turrets, and the hammerhead has 2 medium computers
Ahhh delicious so the Perseus can blade all of it's turrets

crew -2
Polaris has 4 medium computers
Pilot is the engineer
Nah thatâs where you hire 1 engineer npc lol
engineer during combatâ
engineer after combatâ
Blades will consume power, so other than a little power micromanagement bladed perseus will be peak
Ballistic ammo 
ballistic ammo power allocation atm is just "Yes" and "Off"
just need to upgrade shields and quantum
Shields
- Parapet 60k shields 1700hp
- FR-06 56.1k shields 2000hp
Quantum Drive
- TS2 395k speed 2.19 Efficiency 2200hp
- Agni 383k speed 1.82 Efficiency 1500hp
- Baladin 339k speed 1.61 Efficiency 2000hp
Honestly, thereâs a good argument for keeping the FR-06
If your shields suck in the first place, I guess regen is more important because it allows you to get some distance and recharge faster
Anything the Perseus fights will tear through 60k shields
true, im might start looking for military comps again
Yea but Perseus is probably slow, so most likely canât run
True, but outside of player ships, the AI isnât very good at chasing
No need to run when there is a target rich enemy ship in your gunsights
Military comps will be great when engineering rolls around, since they are made to be tougher than the average component
Where did this shit come from
prob the SQ42 video from citicon
Perseus get grade A military Powerplant off the rip?
apparently
@crystal sleet and to think. Perseus will be the ultimate solo ship. Unrammable, PDCs, Cargo, ability to AI blade everything.
Beautiful
French kiss
Just need ILW paint
that is true, but dont let CIG realise that or else she might get nerfed down to a Corsair
They won't slave the top turret
đ
Ahhh Xero
Fuuuuuck
They know people want Perseus and we'll eat slop
ofc not, what did you thought? The literal design procress was "that thing needs way to less crew for the firepower, lets somehow increase it"
but having 4x S4 (or 8x S4) automated + the torpedos isn't that bad
Just that they have shit firing arcs, which i still hope they fix by replacing the turrets xD
if they end up doing quad s4 turrets, something on the Perseus is getting nerfed hard
Quad S4 was the initial leak tho
Yeah and the leak dude clarified it
oh shit
so quad s4, not dual s4 and not quad s3?
But that its still in progress, and nothing is in stone
I mean, I would honestly prefer something else over quad S4
just give it 2 more turrets of those S3 (s4)
but one ontop of the bridge, and one on the tip of the ship
or two secondary main turrets, dual s5 turrets. 1 behind the forward s7 turret and one behind the bridge
You just want your battle carrier 
instead of putting the gattlings on top of the turrets, put em on the sides
Still wonder if we will have to dock it or not, probably depends on if it will grow in size or not
Would be shitty for the cargo till the exterior cargo elevators get released
real asf
Put bottom gun up top, add a s4 under where the main gun would be 
honestly that sounds cool
they could just do what the jav has
and put the remote turrets ontop of the manned turret
so the gunner can use remote turret for anti fighter and main guns against big ships
so many things they could do
currently it's the same length(ish) as the HH so should be good for hangers
John Crew said it may grow but not to the size of Polaris
Its actually smaller lol
Did Perseus get bigger??
No, John Crew said that it may grow but not to the size of polaris
What is the exact difference and is there one?
extra large ship are polaris, reclaimer, and 890
basically, capital sized
rn the largest large sized ship is the carrack at 126 meter long
and it's so wide it just barely fits in the hanger
if something is wider than the carrack, it will likely have an extra large hanger and would be considered capitals
currently most sources says Perseus will be 100 meter long
haven't seen any real change to that yet
I will honestly be happy if they somehow made it even more compact than it is
A 100meter ship with the specs it's getting
That's so good
imagine they meant that the Perseus would grow to carrack size
Ah
See... I don't mind a big ship, but it's going to be weird if 50% of the ship is not being used
Sure I guess they could say ; armor so lots of armor, and compact interior
Like
If it's carrack sized, then they obviously have room to add more or stretch it out right ..
More Cargo?
or some medbeds and... Extra turrets...
I'm all for it. An extra 20 meters when the ships interior was planned to be the length of a Connie
Stretch it by 20 meters, easily slap a medbay in there
Quad S4 btw
going to be like the quad pom pom guns for ww2
they go mad and put a bloody t1 bed
NYAA
I just realized
How easy the event is
Lol

I thought you had to do big cargo six times... I completely overlooked the small SCU
That's significantly easier to do. Done in 2 hrs
yeah its decent, the problem is stock since i dont have a miner nor can we get more mining bags atm
Wha
You can get 192 SCU mole
Very very easy
Click repair and it cost 1 Auec, free bags
lemme see how much that is, i had bought a prospector and then gave up with the bags lol
fuck, i only got 4 mill
guess i gotta just use my ES and haul what Corundrum and copper i stocked up on at magnus
for now
No. Bigger is better.
bigger is better
cant have enough doors and halways to operate 2 guns...
It's a good thing I'm 6ft 1. 
Thereâs plenty of space forward of the cargo bay, they could easily extend cargo bay making it triangular or put a med bay there
There is plenty of space already they should just cut the mess hall for a medbed and delete the captains quaters...
Why tf do you have captains quater for a 3œ person ship?
And cut that crab of a king sized crew quarters and fit in a cell... Why is there always so much wasted space?
perseus?
me after finding out the perseus is a 6 player ship and not a solo ship with blades
So is anyone really going to fit Perseus with 6 people?? đ
well ive been able to get a hammerhead fully crewed a lot of times before, so it shouldnt any be harder now
If I get 5 of my discord to join a session we will go 2 perseus
Never have I ever seen 12 people maby lets say 10 cos no engineering crew one polaris
Those guys all pledged for their own ships. Full crewed will be a rare thing
i run with a group that often has more than 5 players on at a time, i think we had 20 players once in the vc
Thats impressive.
On my shards I never see a fully crewed ship
yeah theres no real reason to fully crew a ship currently as theres nothing to justify a large crew except for chaining large contracts
Larger crews end up being wasteful, I only prioritize filling the most important weapons, I donât want to split an originally 3-4 way reward between 6+ people lol
we'll just have to wait for gameplay loops and features that support/ require large crews and player counts like org stations and basebuilding
Kill the worm
c2 : Height : Height
23.0m
Perseus : Height : Height
21.0m
so this is a large hanger ship, a good amount of room on the sides so the hangar is a good fit.
C2 Hercules is a tight fit via width
If you expect to solo ships you should probably stay at corsair or smaller sized
Especially with engineering you wont be able to solo large ships since you cant pilot and repair damage
Seeing the perseus like that is kinda weird xd
Compared to a herc
Hm, so 32 boxxes won't fit probably only if you play some kind of tetris
but 24 SCU boxxes will fit
this is true! BUT, butttttt buttt but but... That is thinking so far into the future that it may not even come to reality.. I dont discredit what you're saying because that is their goal, but as of right now, and untill 1.0, or untill engineering is in. and EVEN then when engineering is in, there's so much we dont know and to what extent ANY of that multi crew functionality will entail.
We'll have blades, and npc crew eventually. Anyways in the moment, the key take away is; enjoy what is now, not what is to come.
but thinking about tomorrow isnt bad lol, definitely dont make a bad deal for yourself
we've seen how cig makes these great ships and they're shit the next patch.
idk
maybe offgrid
tbf, CIG currently obv works on making bigger ships slightly more soloable
Of course I mean offgrid 
i will solo the perseus, given the future and known info.
it will be do-able and quite possible.
not to an efficent scale that matters in a pvp scenario
my life doesnt need guns constantly gunned 24-7, or to be putting myself into a scenario that requires that
i will check something
i have a 32 scu box i think
from tip of ursa
to back
32 container?
its two 16's
so its technically one 32 xd
well then I don't see any reason why a 32 container shouldn't fit honestly
I mean - wait
the opening is also clearly bigger than the rover
And the room itsself even bigger obviously
So... taking the size of the rover
there fit at least 3-4 32 SCU container in terms of wideness into that thing
hmmm
the image has it like this
maybe 6 depending if the walkway is in the way
well yes but does that matter
thats how the cargo bay is
the direction
DEPENDING on how tight they make it
we MIGHTTTT
might be able to squeeze
The room has to be bigger than the elevator
and the elevator has to be bigger than the rover
it may not fit on the elevator but you could squeeze it still through the opening
and since the room has to be bigger than the elevator, aka also bigger than the rover, meanining it is bigger than a 32 container, they should fit, even if its offgrid
Ursa on Andromeda Clearance
yeah but andromeda isn't a percy xd
In the concept artwork there is way more space on the elevator
you'd think they'd strap this on the bottom of the perseus
afterall..
its got the same interior to interior length
thats the length of the andromeda elevator
and the cargo room goes from one hull wall to the other
while in the connie it doesn't
let me show you what i mean lol
just so we're on the same page, im trying to geusstimate how much room we'll have
its def a little wider
not just a little
its almost the same in the "legth" or wideness however you wanna see it
But its clearly like 5x bigger
Then this would be prob more accurate, but the airlock has to be very near the outside wall, wouldn't make any sense otherwise
clearly bigger than the connies bay
at least in terms of the "room" itsself
But the elevator will be not as "long"
since its a square
om
i think
you make the connie cargo bay bigger than it actually is
im ingame and i tried very hard to align with the model
sec
the connie cargo bay extends to the white marks
the white marks are the missile racks and they're inside the catwalk above the bay
no it doesn't
unless you mean other white marks lol
I meant the RSI marks, but I was a bit wide, the original rectangle seemed too narrow though
after much ingame comparision between marks etc, where the elevator is etc etc
i have come up with this.
but also apparently there's only one docking for perseus?
yes, its for some stupid reason assymetric
thats the cargo room, just my opinion with the side dock
as for the elevator itself
just my opinion
iddddkkk
i think i overexagerated the elevator
maybe more like...
because they did say the panels on the side are just style
goodluck docking with that flap on the side though
?
?
PERSEUS?!
@lone bloom anyways buddy i think it'll be safe to assume we could fit atleast 2x 32 scu boxes in
Got printed one myself too
the back red of the ursa is the width of the 32scu box
exclude the wheels
actually
the back fins of the ursa, not the wide part
is the width of a 32 scu box
thoughts? @lone bloom
I doubt the elevator will be that big but yea xd
I mean, if clearly 32 container would fit into it, why would they say that max is 50?
Or it was very poor guessing by the concept people
50 grid
50 is a weird number too
I think they'll change it
Ahhh 48 grid
They'll probably be stupid and not use the whole elevator
And leave a good foot off the edges to allow for no clipping
And then equalize it so there's no weird SCU number combination
I bet with you, the elevator will be a vehicle only spot, and ony the walls are planned for cargo
Like they did in the starlancer bay
OMMMM
And thats why its 50
Looks like car tracks



