#Perseus Pals
1 messages Ā· Page 4 of 1
cropped out the bengal tho
made the resolution wallpaper scaling weird so itās just this part of the image now
Sick wallpaper though NGL
Beautiful wallpaper and
for showing the original source!
np
just realised these images actually look different from the concept, perhaps this is what the perseus will look like?
No no thatās old, older than the concept itself
That model was still halfway morphed between the old weird Perseus and the one we know now
You can see parts of the old first concept on the sides, where the docking port is
oh i see, i thought they were the kibbling
ah yeah i can see it now, some artifacts left over where you said
it is 
i donāt own a polaris in my hangar rn but i have one in asop
W CIG
i finna not get a polaris now
i will hold onto this nautilus to polaris CCU
and maybe get a paladin
especially rn where polaris is in this weird spot
I hope cig goes with a true ww2 style warship for the paladin, considering cigs definition of a gunship can range from the a2 to the perseus to the valkerie
where idk if iāll want it when percy comes out
because there will probs be a new better cap ship like idris
but even idris is kinda mid
iām sure itāll get up gunned
Upgunned railgun
and if i end up falling in love with the polaris in the next year or two
when percy comes out i can still get one
but theyāll definetly rush to get percy done now
so they donāt have to keep the polaris loaner up
So does the polaris replace the hammerhead or the vanguard
hammerhead probably, maybe itās all 3 though
Maybe considering its size
some people have a glitch where polaris isnāt showing up
but HH and vanguard still are
so maybe it is all 3
Also they better not rush the perseus too much, i still want a good looking ship without any extra last minute greebles and wierd function choices
You mean 2 right?
no as in polaris, vanguard and HH
šš»
Ah ok
I have a polaris in my ASOP
Pesoos
Officially staying a member of this club lmao
Looks like we are going to get a bunch of new friends because of the new polaris prices.
yep
Since the polaris got a big facelift from the flat panels and navy blue, I'm interested to see what happens with the Perseus
Do you guys think a release ILW 2025* is realistic?
thats wrong
iae will be pioneer
i doubt they will release pioneer, perseus, and ironclad together
Absolutely insane you think pioneer even has 1% chance of release next year lol
Last citcon Polaris was approaching graybox and had content cut and was rushed and released this IAE and you think a ship that they didnāt even have a white box to show off and is bigger and has game changing mechanics that need to be developed is gonna be done in 13 months starting from this citcon
Perseus I would say has 60% chance of releasing next year since Polaris is done that team is probably banging out the Perseus starting in next few weeks
no
im gonna say iae next year
shares 60% reusable assets of the polaris
which is why they fast tracked it over galaxy
I just hope they dont give the perseus turrets the same basket canopy glass as the polaris s6 turret. I want to keep the flat angled forward glass since it just looks much more coherent with the rest of the ship, or maybe make it into a solid metal armour panel and have the gunner see out of a surround 3d augmented reality hologram
Also the deed is done
š„
MMH MMH MH Noice
The long required upgrade from 3 months to lti was long overdue
I got 10 years on mine
i forgot my atls was an lti token and melted it lmao
lol
A true nightmare!
As a proud Polaris owner and lover.. I caved and got its little brother as well (itās gonna increase in price 100% so I got it for no regrets later)
Welcome to the fleet captain
I hope perseus is proper fleet defense
She will be, theres a reason why they wanted something between the polaris and hammerhead
all through phase 3 i wish we had percy to knock off idris turrets and pdc so the torps could hit
Maybe we'll get another save stanton style event next year with the perseus, no way theyll just release her without giving us an oppurtunity to rain depleted uranium tungsten rain on large ships
As long as Perseus main guns are not as big of a joke as Polaris size 6, 4 Perseus could probably take out a idris better then 4 Polarisās lol
Same.
Nah 4 Polaris torp volleys would be too much for defence systems
PDS wonāt stop 4 fighters, bunch of decoy size 3 missiles and 12 size 10s lol
PDS doesnt need to stop 4 fighters cause fighters cant damage capital ships
and rn the idris is easily able to shutdown 4 torp volleys from 2 polaris' only ever done phase 3 with 2 polaris' so i dont know what the upper limit is
ya torps are really ez to kill or doge are chaff
good thing our torps are just a distraction
890J can stop 3 Polaris.
Yea 4 Polaris is no threat to idris
oh come off it, all polaris needs to do is send a fighter to shoot out the pds and then launch the torps
No fighter or fighter trio is taking out an 890Js PDCs. It doesnāt hold enough fighters for that and the 890J has multiple large caliber turrets. The new weapon targetting mode doesnāt highlight PDCs either.
itll be balanced out later once the ACTUAL GAME IS MADE
honestly all this balance talk pisses me off, we should be mad about game progress rather than current balance
I paid for it now. It was placed in game now. So why was it placed in game if it isnāt useable now? Besides, how exactly do you think they are going to change it upon āRelease?ā
exactly.
We can be equally mad about all of those things.
people in this discord love to taste CIG all day, you cant say anything negative about how the game is progressing in development
like 4.0 cut features for a small example
Polaris sucks because there are a bunch of balance issues, because there are a bunch of missing game features, because there is a bunch of missing game development!
Dont even need go use guns, just point blank a missile and take it out with blast radius
I thought we complained a hella lot when something happens, remember the Galaxy base building thing? Mastermodes as well
dont get me started on MM
i said it would be a disaster from day 0 and here we are
still absolutely shite
Yeah, although i dont mind it since im usually doing pve, but its still kinda dumb, especially not being able to use countermeasures because theyre linked to the weapon system somehow? Thats too dumb, id understand this if quantum boosting was a thing rn, but without qt boost its just an unfinished feature that ruins the flow
Server Meshing > cut features
Server meshing is cool and all get to experience a broken no content game with more people in 1 session I guess
:feelsgoodman:
Im not sure what your Perseus plan is but shooting larger targets (capital ships) more frequently due to Server Meshing is what is what I guess my plan is.
Deliver box missions what else
Put that 50scu to WORK
Honestly could be a good armoured transport, like thos cash transport trucks that banks use, but meaner
Absolutely
I was kindof thinking of using the Polaris similarly
Get like 2-3 people to man turrets
Attention Hull E, this is your last warning. Stop now or we will destroy you
Phoenix:
The Hull E in question:
The Hull E should have 2 capital shield generators - double the Polaris, don't think you're taking that out with a Perseus tbh >_>
Why? They are both capital except it's from a line of ships known to be lax on security.
The Perseus isn't even really designed to take out capital ships to begin with, although it should be up for the job due to it's loadout and heavy armor
In what way?
I mean even breaking an arm off would probably extremely profitable. But it could easy be Hull B/C/D too
It's designed to be an answer against subcaps. Not caps
D is also a capital ship, but sure, you could potentially break off an arm I guess
It is better armed then a Polaris.
Also, capital shields but no shields in Nav mode.
I'd be curious to see those calculations, since the Perseus is forced ballistic and will run out of ammo at some point, so you could use 4x Ares Infernos for that (in a comparison)
You're not going to catch up to one in nav mode then - Perseus is 92m/s SCM at the moment, by it's Q&A 
Ok but Polaris Torps can't be used against a target that can shoot back leaving it with 2 X S6 and 8 x S4 and 12 X S3 although I doubt anyone wants to use the S3.
I was not even looking at the 2x S6 gun or torps at a glance, since those would run out of ammo at some point too.
It would have 8x S4 & 12x S3, without its torps & 2x S6
The Perseus would have 4x S7, 4x S3, for turrets, then the question is how much damage can you do before you run out of ammo - can you even break two capital shields, and disable the ship in that time
4 x S7 is more crew efficient, has longer range and is probably doing similar amounts of damage.
However, it is supposed to have special shells like, for example, Incendiary which may give it bonuses as well as having bleed through and the ability to take out engineering.
And 40 s5 torps, over 600k damage right there. I doubt the Hull series will get a PDC
The Perseus will have the same problem as the Polaris in an actual fight.
What's that, close enough for guns is too close for torps?
PDCs will kill torps unless the target has already been rendered helpless in which case why even bother when Lasers would do it for cheaper.
It's already covered in turrets which function as PDC, would be surprised if a 372 meter long capital ship does not get PDC too, considering the 890 got them.
I think it was just a bad example though, Perseus would be taking out Hammerheads and such just fine - but massive capitals, no, you'd want multiple Perseus' alongside other stuff
I mean most targets for raiding don't/probably won't have pdcs.
Ironclad, Hull C, herc, mining ships. Hull E is probably too big but still an example depends on how it ends up
Ironclad probably will. Especially Ironclad Assault.
I would expect all capitals to have PDC - the Pioneer even has flak cannons like a Javelin
Hull C isn't a capital, Ironclad would not have PDC either but it has decent (topside) turret coverage, Hercs wouldn't, Arrastra doesn't, etc
Yeah but assault won't have what you want, Juicy cargo
IIRC the Ironclad only has a single turret for bottom coverage, basically the perfect target then, theoretically

Just why?
It's just a heavily armored cargo ship
You're in space, just roll
"Heavily Armored."
Attacks from the bottom.
And if I roll with them?
Outskilled
Dang master and commander never thought Iād see another human who knows that movie
I'm just worried the Percy will be too slow even to catch subcaps haha
It probably will be.
I dont mind having to hold a site or slowly chase a faster ship, as long as my gunners have a firing solution and the guns are doing something whether that be chasing away ships, or keep fleeing ships stay fleeing.
What if the fleeing ship just⦠drives away?
Then the battle is won, the site has been defended successfully
Iām trying to kill them. Not defend anything.
If theyre cocky enough to turn back to you, which they might do because theyll underestimate the percy, you should be able to do that
Ok but assuming they realize I am superior, then what? That basically just makes me a fortress.
Then start playing this in the background
The official lyric video for Dreadnought by Sabaton, from the album The War To End All Wars.
ā SUBSCRIBE for more Sabaton: https://www.youtube.com/c/Sabaton?sub_confirmation=1
ā MERCHANDISE Official Store: https://sabat.one/ytdshop
Listen to the album The War To End All Wars: https://music.sabaton.net/TheWarToEndAllWars
Sabaton discography: htt...
This only applies to my Javelin. I am KOSing any Perseus I hear listening to ā”myā”ļø theme song.
Well dont throw a hissy fit when 20 Perseus's jump out of quantum and start wailing on your javy while we listen to ā¤ļøāš„OURš„ theme song 
"The Galactic Pilot" is a military march of the Earth Federation Cosmo Force (Cosmo Navy) of the Earth Federation. (Space Battleship Yamato: 2199 and 2202)
#spacebattleshipyamato #space #battleship #yamato #march #2199 #song #canzoni
I would easily kill 20 Perseus.
Kills 20 Perseus's after a solid 20 minutes of straight broadsiding and torp spam
Mfw 20 more perseus's jump in, all blasting the Galactic Pilot over global comms
Huh?? Iām not touching the torps. They probably cost more than the Perseus itself. Regardless, I shall simply kill the next group too. How many can there possibly be?
I bet the perseus will have a similar reclaim time as the hammerhead, so youd just get waves after waves of perseus's just jumping in every 15-5 minutes depending if they stagger the launches
I can probably kill them faster than that. 16 X S7, 12 X S4, and 8 X S9 guns are no joke.
True, but can your ammunition storage handle that many ships zerging?
I have Lasers so⦠probably? It has 4K SCU for bullets if I ever go off the deep end.
Sounds like a battle of attrition lol
This all doesnt consider the fact that perseus's might try and ram you, so if there were ramming involved then id imagine some extra component damage to your turrets and stuff
Perseus? Ram Javelin?
Voluntarily getting closer?
Okkkk
Oh, thatās right. I can just fly away.
The battle is won, enemy javy has retreated š¦
Ok but I outrange them. What if I just keep them in the zone where my S9s can shoot them but there S7s can shoot me.
First ship has armour, the second ship has guns
I have more of both of those.
UUURRAAAAAA
Yeah the perseus will have a disadvantage with chasing ships, i wonder how theyll manage the perseus scm, or if theyll change how they want the ship is supposed to engage the enemy. Maybe theyll just take the easy way out and just increase ballistic ranges lmao
They should. Ballistics shouldnāt be range limited.
You think theyll take the leap and make the perseus the first large ship with sniper cannons?
Sniper Cannons?
ballistic weapons being limited by scm vs nav modes is stupid tbh
if the reasoning is going fast requires more power so you gotta turn off weapons, what does that have to do with ballistics
percy and anything with ballistics should be able to just fire in nav
They said they were adding that.
I mean technically you still need power to fire ballistics just not as much as laser
At that point I would launch 4 torps and hope for an engine hit
Oh my
holy grail of savings
Literally
yeah the difference of just striking a pin which your finger literally can do vs generating all that kinetic energy from the ships power resources
from a star citizen ship's power systems perspective that's actually nothing
didnt they say in IAE show that the new Master Modes (called Operator Modes) will always allow weapons in Nav and SCM?
Its just a choice of being able to QT Boost in NAV mode or having shields in Combat mode
so power is only being moved from Quantum Drive to Shield Generator and back
NAV leaves shields on, but quantum mode turns them off. not sure baout weapons in NAV though
That's only 10% off is it not?
the idea is you grab a Carrack to Perseus WB CCU for $15. even though the Carrack and Perseus are $75 apart.
spend $15 on a $75 upgrade
That... is decent.
615 to 675 is a bit of a rough strip
besides the M2
it replaces an uncomfortable region of savings
My only savings are on Polaris and soon Redeemer. Redeemer is Via Paladin saving $40. Polaris... bought at $750 and it's not $925 saving me $175.
CCU chains are hard.
thats why I paid slightly more for a CCU'd greymarket one, not quite the biggest saving, but still only $310
No rank increases though.
rank increase?
I'm not likely to reach $1,000. im only half way and have a happy fleet
3 of my ships are referral reward base, and ht eother is the invictus Titan pack. also ive won 2 raffles. MSRP over $1000, spent $500
ohh concierge, yeah IDGAF, don't intend to buy more than what I have
Concierge, Space Marshal, etc.
its a 3d model actually š
.fbx or somethin
much more valuable
/s
also gives access to the high roller store for spending more
now did anyone here grab the paladin?
I did
Melted reclaimer cause I never used it
I do wished it had cargo tho, it does seem to be extremely fat, msr levels of fatness
yeah, but I really like gunships
I think I might just own all the cool gunships instead of useful ships
1 friend on? scorpius.
2-3 friends on? Paladin
4+ friends on? Perseus
1 friend on? Javelin.
2-3 friends on? Javelin.
4+ friends on? Believe it or not, also Javelin.
Honestly i'd say 2-3 friends is prob gonna be enough for a perseus
1-2 turrets plus damage control is reasonable skeleton crew I wouldn't want more than 5 people on a perseus
2 for the manned, 1 for the remoteturret/engineering is likely. so 4
there isnt really a need to man the automated pdts in the first place unless if its a massize battle
You'll want that flex person for sure
just incase
You have 2 guns and a pilot minimum
Leaving one person to fix the ship as you're brawling
there is remote turret that isnt PDC
?
what are you confused about
Does it still come with PDC then?
Or do you think they work like PDC when not remote controlled
no
yes
theyāre just bladed remote turrets
think like if you could control the polaris PDCs from a seat or leave them automated
theyād probably be better manned but do fine unmanned
Instantly replacing those with lasers. No way I'm having my pdcs run out of ammo mid fight
they might be bespoke
i hope not
but i bet they are
Those look like apoc arms gatlings
they look like these
hello fellers
behold, the beginning of my perseus chain which I will take another 2 years to finish
right after I finish my medivac chain 
the list rn is gladius, medivac, arrastra, perseus
May the CCU chain gods show mercy and prosperity for your Perseus chain
honestly i'd rather have a $265 perseus than a $355 polaris
but after what they've done to the redeemer idk if i should buy a perseus granted they could just downsize the guns lol
Its not like they can downsize the Perseus guns since S6s on the polaris cant even do any more damage than s6 attritions (lol)
they can only keep them s7 or upsize them to a nerfed s8
you are underestimating cig my friend
yeah
oh? I never seen that before
the suit lockers have a cabinet on top of them
oopsie wrong channel 
It is big too
Also the damage numbers arenāt coming from the gun either but rather the ammunition type you use since they said the Perseus bespoke guns will have different ammo types
I know, im just saying that these are their options (unless if they just give up on the s7 guns all together)
Thats until we get different shell types, i doubt theyll complete ammo types by the release of the perseus
Those are the guys who are salty about the polaris only getting upsized to s6 lol. Also i dont believe theyll actually downsize it anyway
I guess its just the matter of making the guns look like they belong on the perseus
thats a critical part of the perseus so i doubt they would release the perseus without it
True but they can just give it a single shell type for now and release the other types along the way
Downsized from S6 to S5. >Upgunned from S5 back to S6.
Nothing changed.
Thats why its funny
they will probably have 2 types for launch maybe more down the road
i think they only confirmed 2
Either way, itll be pretty awesome
APFSDS and HEAT-MP shells for perseus
shieldbreaker rounds
Upscaled to 8K for improved streaming quality
From high quality 4K file ( 27 gb)
Resolution: 3840x2160
Original bitrate:
Target: 25 Mbps
Yes pls!
id like to keep things simple and ask for APHE, pierce the armour and shred the internals
non serious suggestion, how would we feel if they brought the superstructure forward a little and had another turret mounted behind the superstructure? It doesnt have to be another s7 turret, maybe a smaller s5 or even an s4 remote or manned turret
not sure what we'd do with the captains quarters, either make it smaller or somehow fit it somewhere else, but thats assuming we want that extra turret manned ofcourse
Iām hoping we get rsi frigate that is just bigger Perseus but with the triple barrel triple turret layout of the rsi cruiser maybe throw Polaris size hangar bay between the engines in the rear kinda like galaxy
like a USS Cleveland sort of ship?
Polaris:
I can also agree with that.
Turn it to a medbed and im good
Sub capital ships and bigger drop ships should have a medbed imo
And capitals come with medbeds by default
Yea but Polaris sucks, it is wannabe military grade cap plus no where close to frigate status
it feels basically like the starter ship of capital ships
essentially what it is
It is.
decent enough at everything but overall meh, can do all game loops to get you started
literally a starter for orgs
itās the base to have before you get a better ship
sad reality
Theyāll eventually come out with a corvette thatās just better
I mean doesnāt odyssey get same size hangar better cargo same shields and better turret loadout
yeah except itās ātradeoffā will be something minor like āyeah this new one hasnāt got a brig or torpedosā š
āinstead itās got a size 15 dark matter cannonā
starts black holes in the enemies ship and rips them apart from inside
š
yeah i donāt think iāll need a brig with that
everyoneās getting sucked away
or itās just this from star wars
massive emp cannon on the side
yes.
Breaking news! Millitary corvette found larping as a corvette
I was thinking a perseus variant with twin/ single spinals would be pretty cool. I'm surprised sometimes that cig don't do more variants/modularity on their bigger ships to save dev time
43 weeks and 6 days left
43 weeks and 5 days left
a watched kettle never boils
But eventually it will
a watched alpha never betas
So what we looking at here a cutlass or small corner piece of Perseus
hammerhead ā¼ļøā¼ļøā¼ļø
cit con ?
IAE (more specifically the start of november)
lowkey i think we see perseus by ILW
yeah no
I feel like we might see paladin by fleet week
Would be a shame If they are that inefficient with pre built assets from Polaris that a Perseus size ship needs 10 month to build
I mean cig and plans donāt mix, see you bois at IAE for Perseus missing a room or 2
Theres also bug fixing and polishing too
Crap well I guess Iāll see you bois in 2026 fleet week along with the announcement day of sq42 trailer set for December 31st 2027
I was hoping to see perseus at ILW but then they said ironclad was already in development so if i had to guess it would probably be ironclad
but ironclad for def con and as a counter to it perseus for fleet week
wtf 
holy necro my sincerest apologies
I got $64 back with that ccu, enough for all tye new paints the perseus will get
i see -5$

43 weeks
If they downsize the Perseus guns I'm going to become a refundian
im gonna do a bad
Dont give em any bad ideas
If they make a military corvette I pray itās just a bigger Perseus with 3 turrets with battleship turret layout
Bottom coverage required!
Nah forget bottom coverage thatāll be its counter balance plus the rsi cruiser has battleship turret layout on top and no main guns on the bottom so it wouldnāt really be out of place
if ur talking about the perseus it has a main gun on the bottom
so does the bengal which is the big boy
We not talking about Perseus or bengal
hope none of the Perseus devs are in this chat to see your countdown
every message adds one week
lol
Awful. Awful balance.
you and your just outright wrong opinions always make me laugh
you know a ship not having all around turret coverage does not make it a goddamn bad ship right
or were you not aware
for a capital sized ship thats slow it is
Well donāt look at RSI cruiser you might be disappointed
Even if they did it wouldnt really affect anything, the countdown is more of a way for me to make the wait seem shorter, and its not like they have to release it on a specific day.
yea, but id hate to be the team making it and seeing the weeks fly by as they try to get te model carved out
ah true, its a double edged sword i guess
i wonder if theyll keep the console in the torpedo room
since there will definitely be some internal changes, what do we think the area between the torp room and cargo bay will turn into?
a medbay šø
i can see that
maybe they can just make the mess hall smaller and give the reclaimed space to a small medbay
Isn't that where the additional escape pods are?
oooh so thats where they were
i knew they were somewhere there, i somehow didnt realise they were in that space
mmmmhh yyeeeaaa
if a t2 medbay gets added to the percy im immediately melting the polaris
and maybe if the cargo gets a tad bigger
not much just if we can fit ursa plus a couple scu
they probably wont but a man can dream
i dont think itll be a t2, a t3 would be more appropriate for what the Perseus is, also yeah i do want a slightly bigger cargo bay for extra ammo crates
you probably already can
the ursa fits and looks like theres more room on the elevator
theres also a bit more space bordering the cargo lift when raised
thats even better theres more room on the edges
dunno if that will have the grids to snap cargo to tho
but they physically fit
i guess theres a walkway above it so it should be fine to fill in all the edges with cargo grids
from their saying it's an ursa or 50 scu
iirc
well 50scu on thecargo lift
no telling how much more we can fit inside the actual free spaces
if we re fitting an ursa we wont have the scus for more ammo so I suspect the cargo just might get a little bit increase just to fit ursa + s7 gun ammos
or another scu grid insade the cargo bay so we can utilize the elevator for more scu or a vehicle
is there a brig in percy?
no pretty sure
im fine with no brig, but it should have a t3 med bed minimum
just park a nursa inside
It should have both. Itās a patrol ship, itās probably going to have prisoners at some point.
you can still have prisoner pods in your cargo bay
the perseus doesnt have a snub and it cant dock with smaller or equal sized ships so it cant realistically do boarding
so it doesnt really make sense to have a brig since it will just blow up enemy ships instead of taking people captive
No Nursa no way.
the nursa fits with prisoner pods
i dont really like the idea of a brig in a ship like the Perseus, cause its not like youre going out to police an area. Its not like you could maintain significant force with a pretty slow ship either
with engineering can't you just use every room and airlock as a brig? Never saw why you would want dedicated cells that take away space. Would rather have more ammo storage.
Well probably, but most likely there will be a need to access any particular room for engineering
you can open the door by shooting them and they will be hackable in the future so its not really a long term solution
Perseus
Per
soos
yeah I dont see why you would need a brig
Why do we need a brig?
For the survivors
Survivors?
Survivors? You mean target practice
But jokes aside anyone really thinks brig will be more than just a gimmick?
Like npc crews will not come before post 1.0
Player crew will only use ist once or twice as a joke (like the Sea of thieves brig), you wont play again with a group that lockes you away for more than 10 minutes.
Random players will be fd up being locked away from playing and just log off/ sacrifice charakter.
NPC living bounty will just get frozen in these bounty boxes.
So I personally dont see the point.
Maby if you are into roleplay, but I aint.
Rather than being for npcs, its more of a bounty hunting type of feature for ships, if not a roleplaying thing. It depends on how much CIG wants bounty gameplay to lean towards "capturing players alive", they might not even be considered permanent solutions to capturing players, instead requiring prisoner pods like in the Cutlass Blue.
Its kinda early to tell how and what exactly a brig is meant to do, it also depends on if CIG still wants to keep death of a spaceman or just want to go an Elite Dangerous style of respawning
CIG also thought of making it so that when a player is captured, they can log off whenever they want but are considered to be in combat still, meaning that their player character is still in the holding cell, either waiting for transfer to a prison or to be rescued by other players
The holding cell, if DOASM is nailed down, might be a way of performing interrogations or be used as a hostage/be transported temporarily between locations.
Too many variables due to concepted features and systems, when the relevant stuff have been decided and finalised, we will start to understand if brigs will be useful or not
Brig systems for live player capture would likely have a 'submit' button for the prisoner to begin prison game play.
Lots to design in it's respect
well whatever path bounty hunting features and gameplays take, the Perseus doesnt benefir from taking prisoners
i take the prisoners in their own pods
naughty criminals get jettisoned out of the cargo bay
great quote from SPAZ "any of those guys give you lip, just toss em out the airlock"
oh I need to follow this.
I want my perseus
so uhh... we thinkin' ILW for Percy release?
I want to be optimistic but this game is kinda known for crushing optimism ruthlessly
IAE is a safer bet
pyro made 2024 didnt it?
iād say ilw possible iae pretty sure
Except they promised Pyro to release in 2020 
I personally hope for IAE because that means I can get my last CCU bits for the Perseus during ILW eventually and that lets my fly a Polaris until IAE 
they said the ironclad was already in production so thats probably what is planned to release in ILW, they could still manage to release both ironclad and perseus since perseus is using polaris assets but those are both larger ships so I would shocked for them to release them together.
huh
ILW is more military related no?
I thought UEE hated drake
so technically speaking, Perseus has higher chance
and Perseus was also already in production too......
It would be at defense con same place same time
Perseus has maybe 10% chance of releasing at fleet week, confident weāll see it at citizencon, ironclad at IAE
Have feeling the star lancer tac might appear at fleet week since itās just slapping extra turrets to it lol
lot more than extra turrets and wit perseus being small with just 4 turrets and missiles and sharing assets with Polaris i think i will come out a ILW
correct. UEE does not include Drake at ILW, wihch is why the run their own DEFENSECON down the street the day after
hello friends
though the Perseus is said to be in production, we dont actually know how far it is in its production phase, the greybox/whitebox announcement kept its progress vague as well
it might come if it was one of the ones in greybox
but greybox is the largest stage
so if itās right at the start of it thereās little chance but
i think we heard that announcement in november/december so
from december to may if it was in greybox at the time thereās a decent chance of them finishing it or at least doing what they did with the polaris at ILW
maybe
also they have said it shares a larger volume of assets with the polaris than the galaxy does which is why theyāre doing it first
which will also make it much quicker through greybox and LD0 etc
so it is possible, just depends how far along it was. they never specified which stage it was at
Just praying Perseus doesnt suffer Polarisās fate
are you talking about the lack of detail in certain areas?
if you are I doubt the percy will since its a much smaller ship thats already getting polaris assets to re-use so they have more time to make everything look nice together since they dont necessarily need to make everything from scratch
also talking of the over use of panel lining, as well as the main turret
yeah hopefully they dont go crazy in exterior detailing
I like the subtle detailing it currently has, not too much but still clean
they dont need to add much to the exterior imo, other than maybe a few more manuevering thrusters and what not
yeah i hope it keeps most of the concept art look
especially this
i swear theyll say something like "it didnt fit the vision" or "the way we wanted the turret to work didnt work with the concept design"
if my turret dont look like a ship ima be mad
The s6 turret on the polaris looks so harmless compared to this
thats because those are size 7
i do want those turrets to change though
i would like them to have similar turrets to the jav ones with a smaller remote turret above also controlled by the gunner
but thats alot of copium
the question is how are they going to implement the rover by and bottom turret at the same time
from the concept arts I see it's either rover bay or turret
and the interior distribution according the brochure it's not a bay but a ramp that opens from god-knows-where.
I was talking visually, the flat gun bays and the aurora cockpit for a gunners canopy
Pretty sure the rover bay was scrapped because of that
I hope it tuns into the Polari's ramp
opens from the side and doesn't block the gun
Though that be pretty aight, i think they want to reserve the free space opposite the docking collar for an ammo replenishment bay
If this is true Imma melt my Nursa
wdym
the bottom turret is on the rear back
the cargo bay that fits vehicles is in the front
it has the numbers "02" painted on it
the engine pylons cover it slightly so you dont see the actual barrels of the turret just the back portion. Its currently facing the back of the ship since its a rear turret
its facing forward
the rover only blocks its forward arc for a short time, and if you are landed i doubt youāre using that bottom turret to kill stuff anyway i donāt see the problem
maybe instead of a rover bay, they could put a medbay there instead
I feel like a rover bay would be more useful
yeah, id also like to have cargo and a rover
Just put nursa in it boom you get your rover and medbay
Tbh what I would personally love a Perseus inspired corvette, like they take Perseus and blow it up to size of Polaris, give it battleship turret layout like triple size 7, two turrets front of bridge one behind or dual barrel size 8 triple turrets, then slap a snub bay between the engines galaxy style, and give it cargo evaluator that can hold two nova tanks, has strong top but weak underbelly like the bengal cruiser, if triple barrel size 7 is chosen then slap a size 7 rail gun to the nose
I think there's one battleship variant of Bangle in the SQ42 part1
too big and overrated (still pretty cool), need us a cool hero ship thats 200m long
Just give us the Retribution at this point ......
those S7 on the Perseus better sound mean cause the S6 on polaris absolutly sucked.
the s6 just felt like scaled up behring c788 cannons, none of the bespoke feel even
they really shouldve made teh s6's non bespoke
maybe when the Perseus drops and CIG feels like their bespoke waepons testing is done, theyll let teh polaris equip any s6 guns
As far as we know there is no battleship variant of bengal by the time of sq42 battleships were being phased out due to change in doctrine however there are a few still in service but I donāt think they are RSI cause RSI is building ships to fit this new doctrine meaning RSI probably didnāt build battleships and would most likely be an aegis ship since messers were probably more inlined with battleship type doctrine
Yea plus the BB designation is tied to javelins for some reason in same trailer which most likely means javelin model is just a placeholder they donāt want us to see the actual battleships yet
battleships will probably be bengal-like ships with a shit ton of super firing turrets or sumn
bengal like in appearance
They could retcon the entire battleship being phased out (which then allow kitbashed bengal battleship) as there are two cruisers seen one with triple barrel and one with dual barrel which if I was to make a guess the dual barrel is the battleship both use same turret so bigger gun means take up more space in turret meaning less barrel aka possible battleship or heavy cruiser/battle cruiser, or dual barrel could just be an old dev model that they forgot to replace with the triple barrel tbh I donāt even think the devs know, so much sq42 lore is hidden or hasnāt been updated for what has been revealed so far or if anything has been retcon behind the scenes
i hope the battleships get laser or particle beam cannons, its gonna look like a Space Battleship Yamato game
If you look at the scorpius rear turret it's on a rail when underslung, I'd assume something similar to that, it slides on a rail between the engines when not in use
they better sound katoosh kasoosh 
I hope the Perseus launches with refillable ammo and maybe even different types of ammo. Don't want to have to leave the fight and rearm after a minute or so of shooting like the Polaris main turret
Real. I hope Perseus at least have flak and AP rounds
maybe the starfarer will become even more useful by then, both ammo and fuel replenishment mid combat
we could also get distortion and incendiary rounds too
Puwrsthiuos
I was hoping for some sort of internal system where you feed a scu box into the wall to replenish your ammo, Like a reverse vulture. Adds gameplay, choice, preparedness as a gameloop like how they are so fond of, and let's us stay in fights longer
it is likely that the unused side opposite of the docking collar will be use to house the loading system, if not towards the front of the ship in the cargo bay
there is a lot of space there, as well as it being directly opposite of the docking collar, so that if it is required, allowing for cargo to enter through the docking collar from one side, and ammo to be reloaded on the other
The turret is tucked between the engines while the rover bay is more centered
pe
they certainly overlooks physical rearming in the old design flow. one of the coolest parts of Space Engineers for fighters is fitting and securing the conveyors
if you look at the internals of the strlancer tac you can see they are playing with the idea of that
has the belt on the left feeding the turret
I wonder how much ammo we can load at a time, theyre probably going to be pretty big boxes if we are to reload the magazines in a good time frame
Especially for the perseus, though id imagine thered be a maxlift storage rack somewhere nearby the perseus internal reloader
that most likely wont be a feature the perseus releases with
im going assume manually reloading ship weapons internally is going to be a post 1.0 feature
the recent buffs to the Ares inferno and ion s7 guns makes me think that theyre getting ready for the Perseus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jqoxBJl6dY&pp=ygUOZ2FsYWN0aWMgcGlsb3Q%3D
Perseus ship parade
A 10,000 Subscriber special.
"The Galactic Pilot" is a military march of the Earth Federation Cosmo Force (Cosmo Navy) of the Earth Federation. (Space Battleship Yamato: 2199)
This song was composed by Akira Miyagawa.
this is also inspired by that project stardust thing
HER
MY LOVE I CAME TO SHARE IT TOO
Slightly more context for others
Shown in the background of the new pulse variant and racing suit
techncially, the Perseus is in the server banner
PERSEUS BANNER YEEAAAHHH
they had some 10x better ones
every ISC hides secrets like that
same
iām gonna say may is very possible for release
not guaranteed, but very likely
i feel like citcon will be when they release the Pioneer or BLD since either can be released either then or IAE
ironclad is DefenseCon and Tac/Perseus for ILW, so a 50/50 chance for ILW for Perseus assuming its all done and ready
we will have to wait till its ILW PTU
Pioneer is 100% next year more work required then Polaris
Plus we know bld will come before pioneer as they intend to have building in before pioneer as they have said building is not tied to pioneer whether that means they intend building to come out before pioneer or pioneer will come out before building but either way 100% cig probably doesnāt even know
i suspect pioneer will release with a lineup of XL buildings later. with only S/M/L buildings to start
S6
I think if the S7 canopy uses display window like the Prowlerās would be quite cool.
I think that should remain an espeia thing, but at the same time, a proper Esperia Multicrew gunship would be sick, like an Esperia Corsair equivalent
theres still the nova tank with its "see thu" canopy
if you want a solid armour panel for the turrets, just make it look like the 5in guns ww2 us ships had
something like this
I agree. The original design for the Perseus's turret is minimalistic and elegant.
I wonder would they straight out copy the S7 turret on the Javelin and then remove the S3s
there are no XL buildings
I mean I guess there could be but from the sound of their presentation on basebuilding it seems like the XL drones are just better at building everything faster and the only exclusive thing they can build is the supply dock which is what you need for making space station
so maybe building sizes will be xs->L and only XL is supply dock
mirai fury mx also has the camera system on blast shields
mirai also messes with alien tech so...
Acting like tier 0 aināt just gonna be a shack with a door that bugs permanently closed and camp fire that refuses to light lol
the alien tech isnt cameras....
the storm has cameras
i doubt Tier 0 will have any XL stuff
xl gives us hangar ccrafters ddont they?
smth like that
maybe small hangars available from small stuff
large from large stuff like galaxy
idk
i think the hangar crafter was only available as xl for ground basese
the only confirmed building thats XL is the supply dock that makes space stations
or at least thats what i understood but i could be wrong
oh wait, then yeah the hangar crafter would be large
Oh this
could i put 2 larges together to fit a pegasus 
š
how many large hangars to fit the retribution
like 14
a few
uhhhh
iirc XL hangers are nearly 400 meter long
and Large hanger are around 150-200
so yeah, 14 is a pretty close number
but that's only the length, not the width
and height
Wort
Anyone else thinking about using the Perseus as their daily driver?? I mean I know 50 scu isnāt a lot but itās still pretty good
I would use my perseus for running ERTs as that seems to be the best role for it
Some space for cargo if something nice is found, plus the fun of using big dakka guns for the gunners
ya'll think they'll sell perseus at the current price before it hits release in may? 
was thinking of upgrading to it right before price increase
It would really depend on progress done for it
They upped the polaris' price close to release
rip, guess I gotta hope then
If they talk about it at all in may then I would imagine a price hike
It'd be neat if they kept it at the HH price since their fleet doctrine are opposites, but Perseus, if built as intended from QnA stuff, could be pricier
Since ammo swapping and all that
I'll have to see around april lol
itll be my mobile base with a fury/nursa in the hold
Thatās what I was thinking too! Itās the best aggressive looking ship! I love the design, inspired by sharks and the guns and stuff on it! Tbh a med bed would be nice but if I die, Iām going down with my ship
Just slap a nursa in cargo bay and boom you now have medbed aboard
Not gonna happen every ship goes up in price when it enters production cause cig is really really bad at planning and knowing what they are doing
I agree. If anything if the HH gets an update in the future I could see the price of it rising to match whatever the Perseus is in the future
If theres ever rework to the HH, i bet theyll add a module to that gap in the middle
i wouldāve got an upgrade for that at IAE
if it releases in may youāre finished if youāre lucky it wonāt and you can get an upgrade to hold onto until itās release
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
We just got some new leaks that show the Perseus has been beefed up in terms of its firepower, today we'll break down the changes and discuss how they'll affect the ship once it goes flight ready.
All credit to @DrinkersWithGamingProblems for bringing these leaks to my attention!
New to Star Citizen? Feel free to use my referral code STAR-QQ97...
ITS HAPPENING
too early to know still but HOLY SHIT
THEY MIGHT UPSIZE THE S3 TO S4!!!
4 S1 PDTs!!!
@nocturne raft
nah no fucking way thats going live
those s1 ones i think
2 MAYBE cos its a military vessel, but 4 no shot
dual s4 remote turrets tho, thats tasty
4x size 1 pdc
2x dual s4 remote
considering that upgrade to s4 turrets, id expect those to be the way to fight back against fighters
War is changing
and the pdcs be the bare minimum to shoot down torps
seperate missile defense with fighter defense
it was always going to be that. i never subscribed to the idea that the remote turrets were pdcs
they were always just remote turrets that came with blades by default
that just means that the remote turrets wont be bladed, or atleast not commited to
but the fact a military non capital non luxury ship might get pdcs is pretty wild
blades are coming after perseus
yeh ofc. thats my guess. theyll just keep the turrets in as normal remote turrets as they were going to be, the perseus just wont come with free blades
i can live with that, its already a godsend the Perseus gest automated pdcs anyway
if we get any pdcs thats going to be fucking disgusting
without blades assuming u want both remotes covered yeah
pilot , 2x s7 gunners, 2x s4 gunners, engineer
for proper efficiency
i bet engineering wont be out till later this year, so its what we think we need to crew minus 1
i wouldnt be surprised if we get engineering around 4.1
but either way, yeah if u want all turrets manned ull need 4 + pilot
only time will tell, or unless if they already completed blades somehow
well, i think the ai they developed for pdcs was the groundwork for the most part
i have a feeling that CIG has to figure out how to switch from blade control to player control consistently without something breaking
that could be the main blocker for ship blades
possible
i imagine itll either end up something like u have to unplug and store the blades
or u can just power off the blades somehow
maybe, like a toggle on the remote gunners terminal
something like that yeah
cause youd just have to press a switch on the terminal to swap to blade control, then just walk away
make it a switch on the terminal without needing to "go into" the turret
interaction mode > look at switch > flip > sorted
if thats the case, hopefully the pilot or commanding officer can manually control the PDC states too
like how u can turn the QED on and off for the guardian qi
id guess the pilot would control pdcs
makes sense to be on the pilot hud
that would make the Perseus almost soloable, so i think theyll give the controls to someone else
all comes down to how blades are implemented. we know itll drain power cos u have to power the ships cpu
question will be how much power will that cost. cos more power u put into blades the less power ull have on shields, weapons and engines
cos in theory, ull be able to blade the s7 turrets as well
but having both s7 turrets and both s4 turrets bladed would be a huge trade off
cant get over that. no shot itll have 4 pdcs, even at s1. i mean if theyre enough to take down missiles and most torps, and theyre placed so they dont overlap, it shouldnt be a problem i guess
š«”š«”ā¤ļø Fucking YESSS!!!
My favorite ship just got better let's gooooooo
would ballistic weapon be affected tho? I mostly lower my energy when it comes to ballistic weapon e.g. Ares Inferno......
considering that ballistic weapons are basically OFF and ON, it just needs 1 pip for power (from current mechanics and assuming we dont care much about pdc capacitors), so itll free up so much power for other stuff
real
My people
Perseus 2955 ILW?
either that or IAE.
I kinda hope for IAE so I get a polaris til november, when I finish my CCU at ILW 
Poke
whutttt did i forget this existed 
This is going to be the "biggest" ship I'll ever own. Just missing a few more links in the CCU chain.
its going to go up in price too, atleast to 750$ so the "savings" will be more
but considering the potential changes, and new ship tax. If they add PDC's. easily 800$
sec
Yeap! End of the chain is locked in. Just was holding out for a 1 or 2 more potential warbond ccus if they come up this year at all.
unf i was gone from the game for a long time, so i only just started building lol. but im locked in
as well
planning to use the 400$ worth of store credit i have
Nice
If I'm lucky, I'll save a little more. But really just need to get some of the remaining holes and call it done.
im missing alot of ccu holes lol.
so i fixed a hole as i dont think that ccu will show up anytime soon (reliant mako)
ILW should be able to finish it
but ironclads also maybe coming out and they're going to go up
Dang Perseus really is hard counter to Polaris if it gets those 4 pdc, Polaris gimmick torps truly will be useless and those 4 size 7 will rip Polaris apart, easy disable that front turret and Polaris loses a chunk of its dps
it kinda needs them bro
its remote turret arcs are dogshit
1 gladiator you prolly losing š
wonder where theyll put these 4 pdcs
hopefully the back 2 yellows and reds
I also have that CCU basically done. 10 bucks outstanding.... Still hoping for a Gladius warbond CCU again.... A MAN CAN DREAM
good savings
maybe it does, but considering how theyve been going about what gets pdcs, its certainly an anomaly
yeah iām surprised theyāre making a combat ship competent in its role for once
but time will tell
could have 6 power pips and make the PDCs useless
lol
very possible. tbh the real challenge the perseus is going to have is power management. especially as we dont know how much the blades on the turrets will take up, or the size of the cpu
yeah
polaris jr ššš»
according to imadeitup.com, the Perseus will come this ILW
im slightly concerned ab the 2x s3 shields for something thats supposed to be fighting large ships but i guess thats where the "heavy" armor comes into play. Also confused on the remote turrets, iirc the 2 remote turrets the percy currently has are PDT's that have the option to be remotely controlled rather than AI controlled but they are AI controlled by default. So does that mean we are getting a total of 4 PDT's that can also be manually controlled or are we getting PDT's and then seperate remote turrets? the number of remote turrets matching the manned turrets has me hopeful its getting similar turret design to javalin where the main guns are manned but theres a remote turret above it controlled by the same person.
considering its meant to be heavily armoured, i wouldnt worry about the shields too much
gonna be face tanking most stuff anyway
also the remote turrets are not pdcs
never were, never will be
theyre just dual s4 remote turrets thatll come stock with ai blades
If we could get a full SCL or update on the Perseus, Iād be soo happy!
Eventually, maybe a week or two before the Perseus Patch
the remote turrets were pdcs
always has been, thats why they come with ai blades stock
based on the q&a they were never pdcs
the term pdc wasnt used
pdcs dont use ai blades
no they dont
If you want to be technical, the whole ship is designed for point defense 
yeah but their use of point defense in that context is misleading
its not point defence againsts missiles its point defense against large ships
Same definition, though
you are right however im arguing that the remote turrets are in actuality PDT's such as the ones on the polaris and your quoting the term being used for describing the ship as a whole acting as a turret against other large ships
point defence turrets were just called remote turrets that come with blades pre-installed
Yep, but CIG's definition of that specific term has changed multiple times over the years now
They do function as PDCs though, by default
fair

they never specifically said the bladed turrets can target missiles
but this was before they knew pdcs were going to be a thing
so they might
or if they give the percy PDCs they turrets might only go for ships
or theyāll let the player choose maybe with engineering
"PD guns."
Hope the persy gets em.
point defence could be just from fighters, the blades running them might not target missiles
Hope
Thatās not point defence. PD is the act of hard killing missiles.
My Perseus will hard kill missiles with its thiccc armor š
My S12 torpedos will hard kill you.
What does this mean?
Oh nice!
I canāt tell if youāre trying to act tough or joking š
Joking.
A Single S12 Torpedo will bankrupt me. I am uninstalling them on first spawn.
A single S12 torpedo could feed your family for many moons & send your kids to college
It could supply an entire family for an eternity.
are phalanx on navy ships point defence
?
they shoot aircraft or small boats
Yes. Since when?
wym since when
This is not a Phalanx.
?
The thing that takes out small boats and small planes. Although for planes, they primarily use SM missiles.
phalanx definitely shoots down drones i seen a video of it doing so
"Kamikaze Drones" Are just missiles.
Contains explosives.
Guided.
It's just a missile.
if it can shoot a drone it can shoot a plane
Missile.
mb i missed the source from 2017
Missiles travel toward the ship and attack at point blank range. Planes won't get within 100 miles.
okay but it could still shoot a plane if it was in range
same way the PDS works on the polaris
Yes. But planes will never come in range so realistically, no it can't.
yes but ships will never come in range of the polaris PDS but it still can
it might be a death wish coming closer than 2.2k to a polaris
or any ship with lots of turrets on really
like the HH
They often do. I have killed perhaps a dozen enemies yesterday alone and the same on Monday.
i wouldnāt fly my fighter in there
Nobody is crewing those.
The PDCs do very little damage.
but it still can shoot them
im referring to the manned turrets
you would not want to get close to those
I killed a Talon yesterday.
Depends on which ones.... I think a Phalanx would probably do more
The S3s do very little damage. Litterally less than a Hornet. The S4s... also do not very much.
Phalanx when?
itās got quad size 4s or 5s all over it hasnāt it?
2 Quad S4s and 3 Quad S3s.
And the Dual S6.
A hornet is just straight up better in every way.
itās also got 7 size 1s
I just hope the Javelin gets those, but I doubt it will. Should still have flak though.
They have a 1KM Range.
2.1?
It does. I don't have the pic on me but check through that video. There is an image of the Javelins Underside from the left and it nearly (12??) Visible. That makes me assume it will have nearly 50!
The PDCS only get 1??
a hornet is better than 1 of the turrets but not when more than that is crewed, 4 size 4s a hornet doesnāt even have that
Yes it does? The MK2A and Super both get 4 S4s and 2 S3s when fully equipped.
itās 4 size 3s and 2 size 4s
the ball and nose turrets are size 3s
the wings are the only s4 mounts
??????????
bro just posting random shi ššš»
Wait, what?
It was supposed to be this.
But yea, 4 S4 and 2 S3.
not 1k PDC range
those āsize 4sā are weaker than all the actual size 4 weapons so
good call for them to up perseus turrets to 2x S4.
Wait, what??
Size 4-. But closer to S4 then S3.
Agreed.
size 3.5
and you might as well just run lasers
regular SH turret for extra missiles
because realistically
every single ship has a 50% (most are actually more than 50%) ballistic damage reduction on the hull
And shields do a 30% reduction on ballistic damage too
So when you shoot a ship that has shields with ballistics:
- The shields reduce the damage by 30% (taking you down to 70% of the damage)
- The hull then also reduces this by 50% (taking you down to 35% of the damage that the number on erkul claims that it does)
I don't have the regular turret. I have the F7A MK2.
even that works fine with lasers
Ok but shield penetrating damage is good.
But S3s and the Hornets have bad capacitors.
Same as the Polaris.
bad ammo capacity for ballistics too
2000 Shots isn't that bad.
anyways that doesnāt matter, this is still the case as your second pair of size 4s are still atrocious and not real size 4s
size 3+ or 3.5 maybe
just because itās s4 doesnāt make it good at all
it is if youāre fighting more than 3 ships
Of what size?
I thought they were quite decent.
I dunno, maybe that's just me.
I still wonder why the new hornet has 1 more shield though.
Already bought.
(It's gonna get Polarised.)
to sell it
Sadge.
THIS IS WEIRD
THIS IS WEIRDDDD
WHATS WEIRD?
I guess they're really that big
sec
no
thats so weird
PDCs or the guns got thinner.
Ballistic PDCs?
Ballistic PDCs?
the turret is in the back middle, and the other is top back right?
but then we got substantially smaller fire from big gun location
look like big gun discharge
They didn't turn the big guns into Gatlings did they?
okay so the top are the big guns, they're just that big lol looked weird to me. better see them here. 
They look very thin.
distance prob
Where are my big guns??
where did u get this?
idk news in discord
im trying so hard to find any possible pdc behavior lol
theres this little spot but its hard to tell
Probably see more in later promo videos or ISC's
Right now they're teasing hard which means it's most likely 70% or more completed. Pdc's will likely be shown off in either a trailer or knowing Jared, in a sneak peek
They only teased once in ISC?
When is the next ISC?
Got teased twice. Though last one was a few months back if I remember correctly.
Where?
Not sure but should be fairly soon.
They talk about Supply or die event
Ooo
At the gym rn but I'll go back and look when I'm back home.
I could be trippin
I know a few ships got subtly teased recently but I'm excited for the perseus to be near complete
What ships?
Kraken had one or two cameos, legionnaire showed up in a hangar in the castra teaser, perseus in the recent cameo and the guardian had a few right before it dropped. Though I think the legionnaire got pushed back so we didn't see it again yet.
Why has Legionnaire been pushed back??
Beats me. I ain't cig
Imma edge until ISC and see if Perseus get teased
Krakens main cameos were about go get blown up by the Scorpius duo.
True but we also got the one in the new levski vid
Makes me excited for the aircraft carrier
Where?
You can find it raising out of the hole with one or two ships nearby.
Where is Levski?
This doesn't even look half done. It's missing a giant chunk!
They keep teasing me with it and I want it lol
Hacking, it's meant to be able to hack open airlock to board
Yes. And?
Well hacking doesn't exist yet and they've said that they don't want to add ships until their systems are ready



