#Boeing A.T.T. / Boeing Model 767-611

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

cursive lynx
#

The internally-known Boeing Model 767 (Not to be confused with the later Boeing 767) was a series of proposals forwarded by Boeing to NASA under a program in 1971 dubbed A.T.T. - "Advanced Transport Technology".

The goals of A.T.T. were to create a Mach 1 airliner, utilising the historically low fuel prices of the period, and proposed cutting-edge technologies and brand-new fuselage designs to reduce drag. The A.T.T. program was shortly shelved and ultimately forgotten during the 1980's oil crisis.

The full story of the Model 767 series is extensive and its documentation largely niche, lending to its short program life due to the fuel crisis. However, details are plentiful through the proposals that were considered, with the mock-up for the tri-jet (and quad-jet T.A.C. program) configurations existing.

To note, Lockheed and general dynamics (under Convair) also submitted their own plans to the A.T.T. program, but were not developed as far as the Boeing Model 767-611 specifically.

I also believe this transonic aircraft could benefit further than its immediate sum and give it a secondary useful purpose; as a transition for players new to the game. Transonic aircraft can bridge the gap between subsonic aircraft and super-sonic transport aircraft, just like the Coronado 990A.

Relevant attached documentation and photographs show the rich information within the Boeing Model 767 and A.T.T. program.

Boeing Model 767-611 specifications

Cruise speed: Mach 0.98
Cruise altitude: 30000 feet
Range: 3000 miles / 5560 kilometers
Maximum payload: 40000 pounds / 18100 kilograms
Maximum passenger configuration: 199

odd stirrup
hazy niche
#

I hope there is nothing wrong because id love this

cursive lynx
#

Honestly the hardest part was finding the mockups

#

all the data is in those documents

hazy niche
#

Bro even provided the un-classified documents forgive

hazy niche
vague nacelle
#

e

cursive lynx
#

here's another scan, unfortunately the full resolution is paywalled. sigh.

#

also i think the altitude is more realistically 40,000ft as shown in the wing design loads, initial cruise altitude isn't maximum cruise altitude. ill leave it at 30,000ft though as-is, just a bit of discretion.

graceful geode
#

Hell yes

orchid ivy
#

Surprisingly good blueprints for something with no mockup (?)

cursive lynx
#

Whoops! forgot to attach it

orchid ivy
#

Seems to be a scale model rather than a development mockup

cursive lynx
#

Above is the T.A.C model

#

yeah, my bad

#

since the wind tunnel testing was so extensive, lending to the nasa-joint project, that is quite a heavy justification in lieu of a 1:1 mockup

#

but if its not acceptable, fair enough.

vivid heron
#

Peak…

rose nexus
#

I'm not sure but i think this is the NASA mock-up. It really looks like it and as far as i can trackit it comes from a correct source but i don't have a good visual at the tail to confirm it has a third engine.

#

But the wings looks like they are at a lower angle attached...

#

and as immage description this

#

''Boeing 767 NTF correlation test-611 11ft. w.t.''

cursive lynx
#

Yep! but that engine configuration is different from the -611. there's also these three images from the windtunnel testing, but the third engine is missing...?

orchid ivy
#

It's pretty much a normal 767

rose nexus
cursive lynx
#

that's probably a 767 test

#

not the model 767

rose nexus
#

probably. mb sorryµ

cursive lynx
#

yeah no worries

thorn hound
#

Mock-up this and mock-up that.. I see cool plan I hit YES

solemn basin
#

another reason why im against wind tunnel models

brisk cloud
iron tendon
#

american tu-154

#

it looks like a tu-154

cursive lynx
vivid heron
#

-# if anything wind tunnel models mean the project progressed farther than a simple desk model

cursive lynx