#YGH-60 Silent Hawk
52 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
We do not need more blackhawks
Isn’t this entirely fictional as well
fictional aircraft aren't allowed
ahem isnt the GH-60 also fictional
we also don't need more airbusses or wtv

It's a badge vehicle 
okay? this is a variant of said vehicle.
yeah, from the bin laden raid
the rules say and i quote
"Any vehicle that isn't a real aircraft / boat, or a project for a real aircraft / boat"
The MH-60X and the GH-60 the game likely based it on is a real aircraft. Sure, it may have only flown once or twice to the public's knowledge. Doesn't mean it's not real. Thus, since this a variant of said REAL aircraft, it is not against the rules.
you might as well suggest the aurora then since "as far as the public knows"
i meant it could have flown more times, we just have no way to confirm. besides, is there actual physical proof of the aurora existing?
see above image.
it was not suggested, added as per dev discretion
okay. it's in game regardless. I'm suggesting a variant. there should be no trouble.

there isn't proof of the entire silenthawk or stealthhawk existing either, it's mostly speculation based off the above image and another image of plates welded onto a blackhawk
is there a picture of any part of the aurora aircraft?
there's plenty of "proof" as with every other napkin drawn aircraft lol
sigh answer the question. does the general public have access to a real photo of the aurora? if not, then since there is an actual image of a part of the MH-60X, your argument is invalid.
there are public sightings of the aircraft which are about as credible as the image you've provided of the supposed stealthhawk, there's no evidence connecting either to an actual proposed aircraft in service
are there any images of the aurora?
that's besides the point
my point is that there's not enough information or evidence to actually prove what the plane looks like assuming it exists
your point is invalid considered the devs added the GH-60 in the first place without that information or evidence.
it was added as a fictional vehicle as stated by the modeler themselves
i don't see a point
The GH-60 was added as a senior moderator vehicle, bypassing the requirements of being “real life”
It was then transferred to badge
The GH-60 already has many variants, adding more would be kinda fruitless

it has NO variants. it has plenty of advanced customization, but no variants or conversions.
Because every convertible variant is another slot of the vehicle that has to be managed when performing changes
It is a lot more efficient to put variants under advanced customization than as separate vehicles, and if such a conversion was added (we already have plenty) it would likely be the same case
idk what i was expecting when i made this. forget i said anything.
-# 


im sick and not thinking straight. i apologize.
Fictional prototype
