idk if the roll on the a343 is long enough

[gray wraith]

im taking off with 50% of the runway but the a340-300 and -200 usually use all of the runway

[alpine mountain]

What's the suggestion

[finite sinew]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1411067161937711175/1411077637853548664/POST.gif

[ebon portal]

#1020408036180893887

[compact wren]

I think it’s saying that the A340-300 is overpowered in terms of thrust?

[tacit osprey]

lemme try to translate

[tacit osprey]

"i'm taking off and in the end i still have half of the runway left to go. Meanwhile on a340-300 and a340-200 i usually have to use all of the runway"

it makes a6solutely no sense aswell

[compact wren]

no I think it's "I only need half of the runway to take off with the A340-300, but irl they need the entire runway"

[tacit osprey]

true

[umbral wing]

@gray wraith would you mind explaining/ developping your post more?
-# you may or may not get warned for this post currently

Are you talking about the planes acceleration being too high?

[gray wraith]

yes

i feel like its to fast acceleration compared to how the hairdryer engines usually are

[umbral wing]

do you perhaps have some sources to prove your point?

One that would show that at full throttle the a340's cannot do that

[twilit lagoon]

tbf this is kinda true

a lot of aero aircraft have weirdly short takeoff rolls adn the braking feels weak at times

[mental stag]

Typically they don’t really take up the entire runway

[velvet jacinth]

this is also because aircraft usually do not use full throttle on takeoff rolls

they're usually about 80-90% full throttle to reduce wear on the engines

[rigid mulch]

well this heavily depends on how long the runway is?????

also why is this in suggestions

[fleet island]

Uh