Realistic crash (I've read the documents before!!!1)

[pine agate]

The document "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_2K1EMJ4rYiD3dLFKQ2iOXa8yqf6fC4rN215RFP0atM/edit?usp=sharing" states that "coding for every building" just to get the wanted realistic effects of crashing. Though why can't we just use negates? Since the world is made out of parts rather than meshes, and if it were to be meshes, then as is.

How: Duplicating the Collision part in planes
Models since it covers the mesh of the plane, this part (not `Collision', rather the new part) would have no collision and is scaled up
https://youtu.be/GA_-1AjbtCo?si=x7aIA5Ix8nTlChNe

Cons: Floating point, maybe minor memory problems if crash is in effect

[peak solstice]

[pine agate]

Create a crater using an-225

[wet stump]

Vri

Vro

No

[pine agate]

Yes

[wet stump]

What kind of shitty suggestion is this

Like

I'm sorry but this is

Not good

[pine agate]

Project flight type shit

Rather than making every building part by part which takes ginomosaurus amounts of memory, utilize csg instead, to avoid remaking buildings

[pine agate]

Maybe because I suggested this in the morning rather than late night where my brain is filled with theories

[wet stump]

Crashing into that one 250m parts building at anhedral:

https://tenor.com/view/pc-computer-cleaning-fire-explosion-gif-27016976

[fresh bronze]

Interesting idea, though the world is made up of a lot of relatively thin plates

so these crash negate balls might just create holes into the void

[pine agate]

Afaik, the world is not unioned altogether, they can be expanded down, which would stop submarines from going under the islands

Though, some places just above the sea would make the holes fill with water

I dont think below the plates are void but rather water, and I know for a fact that there are no places that go underwater for planes to go through

[wet stump]

Letting the adults argue over this while I just watch

[pine agate]

I'm still younger than unc yk

[pine agate]

Which means that the water(sea) is hardcoded flat surface and cannot be removed into parts to avoid filling the hole

[fierce edge]

yea

but like

doesn’t this game want to stay away from that

[pine agate]

It wants to be realistic, though not too realistic, everyone wanted some crash physics, though this is probably the best in my mind

Crash physics in plane is not possible, in Roblox as a whole

[fierce edge]

of course

[wet stump]

Sorry mb

[woeful falcon]

A nice idea but the aim of aero modelling is simplification

Doubt anything like this would be implimented

[tough garden]

uhhh

no

[pine agate]

Dang

Womp womp

[mighty ice]

You mean negating a hole in the ground with the shape of a collision part?

Planes aren't meteorites, they're soft and squishy

The ground itself doesn't get destroyed, they do

[pine agate]

Depends on velocity

The faster, the bigger the "part" gets

[mighty ice]

Velocity changes how much they'll split into their individual components

Also

A hole in the ground like that would look extremely unnatural

it makes no sense, sorry

[pine agate]

I mean, it can just use spheres rather than the shape of collision parts

[mighty ice]

They're not meteorites man

The most that can happen is scenery items get destroyed

But even then you see the crash site for a few seconds before going back to hangar

[pine agate]

How does the search and rescue crashed plane looks like

I know it doesn't make a crater

But rather just a PNG

[mighty ice]

Don't think I've ever seen that one

[zealous grotto]

also uh

a big reason why realistic crashes are denied is also to not encourage kamikazes

if we let buildings and terrain realistically explode like this, people might start vountarily crashing into buildings to see it in action

and i honestly couldn't blame them for wanting to try out a feature added by the devs in the videogame

[quasi mantle]

This tbh

As cool as it would be

Aeronautica is about not crashing i think

As 99% of gameplay

[inner cloak]

just make a hole after aircraft collided than make alot of part then uhh..

[woeful falcon]

This is cool but would take way too much brainpower and effort to add such an unaffecting feature

Better stuff could be done

[strong elbow]

where did you get the idea that the world is made out of parts

[nova olive]

most normal devs who aren’t trying to model every bump in a brick make their games out of parts