#777-100

34 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

gaunt coyote
#

So the model with the DC-10 style tail does not exist really, but the one with the 727 tail did steamhappy

Stats:
(From simple flying https://simpleflying.com/boeing-777-100/#:~:text=The 777-100X was a,it as the 777-200.)

The 777-100X was a 250-seater Boeing 777-200 shrink that could fly a range of 8,500 nautical miles (15,725km). It would have had a 6.4 meter shorter fuselage than the 777-200, and it would have a maximum take-off weight of 300 tonnes. The same engine would have powered it as the 777-200

Would have the same engines as the -200 (presumably PW4000s as this was an earlier design, and the prototype 772 was equipped with these)

Presumably the same stats as the 772

@warm patio

IMG_7686.jpg IMG_7685.jpg
Simple Flying
Why Didn't Boeing Build The 777-100?
warm patio
#

firstly rule 1a

#

secondly

gaunt coyote
#

Seems to have been developed from uhh

IMG_7687.jpg
#

Whatever this is

#

Correction, according to the secret projects forum (Ty for aberbee for showing me this) it says it was supposed to be powered by JT10Ds

#

Which is the PW2000

dapper jungle
#

Doesn't make sense

odd birch
#

just use dc-10

Boeing_777-100_Trijet_Concept_Model.jpg
#

ez fix swag

swift wolf
#

Can u not just use a dc 10 at this point

odd birch
swift wolf
#

Mhmm

odd birch
swift wolf
gaunt coyote
#

the reason this doesn't exist is because

#

yeah

#

that

patent prism
manic matrix
patent prism
tawny jacinth
#

POV:
There is no L-1011

"use dc-10"

There is no 727

"use dc-10"

There is no dc-10

"then just use the god damn md-11"

#

dc-10 = solution for everything😂

odd birch
gaunt coyote
#

just because they have 3 engines doesn't mean they look similar

small stag
frail swan
gaunt coyote
frail swan
#

Probably its just one of those wannabe AvGeeks that dont know anything more than A330 and Ryanair

gaunt coyote