#add collisions with planes as well as a TCAS system
67 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
already are collisions, look at clarence
No because (my opinion)
A. How would cross server work
B. Annoying af, griefers will mess up everything
some guy would stay in a blimp above clarence and eep setting it off
Yep
C. Griefers in ATC events will absolutely fuck everything up
Also floating point would be an issue
Even if the above reasons are don’t convince you on why it would be a bad idea
can be disabled in opzions
and if it wouldnt be an option, cross traffic wouldnt count
Also what would even be the purpose of it?

im sure thats against the rules mate
go play msfs
Überlingen (German pronunciation: [ˈyːbɐˌlɪŋən] ; Low Alemannic: Iberlinge) is a German city on the northern shore of Lake Constance (Bodensee) in Baden-Württemberg near the border with Switzerland. After the city of Friedrichshafen, it is the second-largest city in the Bodenseekreis (district), and a central point for the outlying communities. ...
Ain't no way self react
its literally a fucken small town
überlingen incident*

@somber moon
@lyric phoenix you didnt read the rules at all, didnt you
does it mention air collissions? no.
mhm...
cuz 97% of the time they are the same in every server
'more realistic crashes' 
isnt air colissions
by more relaistic crashes are meant crash animnations and if oyu strike a wing it falls off
crashes cover *all * incidents

i saw that
This guy is a leaf muncher
(isnt like we had 4 runway incoursons under 1 minute)
this is exactly whats written in rejected
wouldn't plane collisions make the game basically unplayable
everyone will just spawn kill
you can't leave the airport
anyway another reason such stuff is rejected is
with current code its basically impossible to make
our models dont have separate parts like fuselage/tail/wings
etc
its one thing together
Is there even a game with realistic plane crashes on roblox
so its impossible to add without remaking all vehicles
theres one but its like
1 fps gameplay

Don’t do that, okay?
And dont make a suggestion just based on wanting to recreate an air disaster
Going to have to agree here. The discussion of this topic alone usually constitutes to verbals and written warnings.
The optimization of crash physics in Aeronauitca would not only be something the devs would never do as we are not a plane crash simulator and never will be, but trust me, we do not need and do not desire people re-creating aviation incidents and accidents just because "it is possible".
Not a good idea. The idea has been rejected already in #rejected-suggestions , too
you know that a dude got suggestion banned for making suggestions to recreate real incidents
are you serious bruh ☠️
Even without the whole incident recreation thing, the physics just don't work for collissions, just ask HighAdmiral during the Viper event

