#Camera Advice
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
2006?
I mean yeah but they're still stupid competent bodies imo
as far as super budget bodies go they're one of my favourites
I had to get rid of my d200 recently
rip
I don't regret it in the slightest but I do want another one
(I bought it for the sensor, not bc I needed a cheap camera lmao)
so shall i get d200 then
what about d3300
d200 is 10 mp
i used to own fz72 which was 16
and i got it for 50 pounds used
but had some errors so i returne
what does it mean
Tbh
Idrk
But if your hell bent on detail higher is better, and full frame will be the biggest difference
@glad juniper is smarter about this
(I'm at work rn)

I disagree
because on full frame, you tend to have the same number of pixels on an APS-C body but spread over a larger field of view
so pixel density is lower
whatever you're trying to photograph will occupy less of the sensor, and therefore less megapixels will go towards the object you're trying to photograph
Not quite
what do you mean?
Since I'm too lazy to paraphrase here's some stuff from googly
Full frame sensors tend to produce more detailed images than APS-C sensors with the same megapixel count because the individual pixels are larger. The larger sensor size allows for larger pixels, which can capture more light and information, resulting in better dynamic range and lower noise in low light or high contrast situations. Full frame cameras are often the preferred choice for shooting at high ISO settings.
Don't get me wrong
APSC has their place and benefits
Detail isn't really one of them
define "detail"
full frame having better dynamic range and RAW files that are nicer to work with is true
FF being preffered for high ISO work is true
larger pixels is true
"more detail" is not true
all things being equal, you won't get "sharper results" out of a full frame camera compared to an APS-C one unless it's way higher resolution, your object is physically taking up less pixels on the sensor so you're going to have to crop in more to get the same framing, getting rid of more detail
plus like the real determining factor for "detail" or sharpness is lenses
inb4 assuming you have an FF camera and an APS-C camera that are both 24mp, you can see here that the APS-C frame has more megapixels spread out over a smaller area, literally giving you more "detail" for whatever it is you want to shoot, there are more pixels available per area than on the larger sensor with the same megapixel count
dx gets more out of the lens yes, but fx gives you more light and more pixel area to play with
hence a free-er crop
i'd much rather a low mp fx sensor over a high mp dx sensor
since there's a limit to how large you can make the pixels on an apsc sensor
purely in terms of perceived detail and sharpness however, crop wins
here's nikon's 20.9 apsc vs the new fuji 40 apsc
smaller pixel area
21-24mp is the functional "limit" to an apsc sensor
you can go higher but start to lose low light perf
I had some rodeos with the R7 and 150-600 and thought it was perfectly fine tbh
frankly Adobe AI denoise has opened up so many possibilities with crop bodies I don't think of it as a bad thing anymore
lmao adobe
I use darktable personally but someone else's lightroom account whenever I'm delivering to a client
because I can't be bothered to pay for adobe BS
this is also last years camera with a modern sensor and digi x
still a smaller pitch tho
personally pixel pitch isn't a massive consideration when I'm choosing a camera
tbf most nikon crop bodies were like 21mp or something, below the 24mp "limit"
R7 was just an example
I apologise if I sound argumentative btw
lol fair enough
nikon generally keeps their apsc sensors to 24
afaik its the same sensor in both the D3X00 and D5X00
really the only proper deciding factor for fx vs dx is a, what lenses did you buy already and b, do you have enough to buy an fx lens
cause crop factor sucks
400mm is fine for me on the D7500 at most airports but its the limit for the d700
like i can't really go much further
like i could get away with a 80-200 in some spots with the 7500
but definitely not with the 700
personally the crop factor works in your favour on a crop sensor for aircraft, you get closer to the action without having to get closer physically - either you’re forbidden from getting closer (fences), or you physically cannot (they’re in the sky and you’re not)
I can't imagine myself shooting aircraft or wildlife without the crop
i have to lol
i'm jumping to z in a year or so
so i'm stuck with fx either way
which i'm totally fine with lol
why do you think i'm looking to sell my 100-400 so i can get a 150-600
lol
well personally I'm broke and don't actually own a camera of my own other than a Canon 2000D and kit lens
any work I do is off friends' bodies and lenses lol
wrangling ancient DSLRs is kinda fun
huh
The 5X00 lineup is nikons intermediate bodies
so what do i get im so confused 😭
Better built than the 3X00 series but less features than the 7X00 series
what about the eos 450D
so what shall i get
my budget is 250
pounds
a D5200 is better than a canon 450D
real answer is: save up another 200 and you'll have infinitely better options
for 450 you could get a whole D7200
which would blow basically everything out of the water
talking about cameras, when the time comes that I need to upgrade my 7100, should I go for a d800 or look into mirror less?
it would take me another year
and i wanna do some spotting now
so i might get a starter cam
then upgrade in future
if i want
shall i get a D200? then?
@glad juniper
i found someone giving 2 nikon cameras for free but they have erros
errors
2 Nikon cameras Nikon d80 and nikon d3100, one with Err code and other with faulty focus. Both free to pick up, I don't want money I just want them out of the way.
take them cos they're free
ok
have it as a project and if you can't fix them, use it for decoration and buy a fully working cam
that's what I'm saying
find out what the error is
Or use the 3100 with manual focus
If your Nikon camera is blinking Err on its display, this video will tell you what might be happening & how to fix it.
If you are still having a problem make sure to isolate it to the camera or the lens by testing different lenses on the camera and different bodies on the lens.
Check in the comments below if there is still a problem,
someone m...
Could be as simple as some dust on the contacts
You can't be scammed out of free brother
Take a second to think about how hard it is to fake a camera
ok
i messaged them
to ask
💀
"Um excuse me are they actually free or are you gonna charge me or are the actually free 👉👈"
bruh i asked is it still available 😭
bazinga
Good price?
In near mint, desc just yaps about the other conditions
Sharpness looks mad too
I don’t know anything about the quality of the lens but that seems like a decent price
I'm surprised I still haven't bought a lens after all this time lol
Would ya'll recommend the canon 70-200 f/4 L USM
Me neighbor gifted a Canon camera I need professional advice about it
What kind
Well it's canon, so it's either reasonably alright or shit
There's really no in-between
It was pretty popular in 2006-2010
Does that mean it’s outdated
Name
Nikon D700
Paired with a sigma 100-400 for the taxi and helo shot
24-120 /4 for the ramp pic
How did you get to stand right there
Stretched my arms over the fence
@random prism I win
expired in '21 so its actually still good
(and its real superia)
fuck
lmao
i still have the 10$ dev and scan
mind you for 2 rolls
(the scans were 1080p)
you really should start cam scanning
your tripod can do the upside down thing right
no
it uhh
did a die
it was also 2nd hand from god knows where
i also says amazon
lmao
you could tape your negs to your computer screen and run it that way but you'll need a spacer
that sounds so jank lmao
i can make a little light box
i wonder
if i could use my moms schools
art room light box
oh that'd be perfect actually
it doesnt work well
the pixles mess it up
yeah thats why you'd need the spacer
yeah
are camcorders good plane spotting cams
nah i spot at daytime only
I mean it's fine
200mm isn't that great for planes but that also depends on where you spot and what you spot
Good is relative, it'll be better than your phone but a 15 year old camera will still outshoot it
Hell even a 20 year old camera will outshoot it
Shockingly, Temu sells 35mm film. It's not all it’s cracked up to be, however.
I don't recommend you buy this film, but if you do , use my link
https://temu.to/m/ubbtdmiwq1i
Photograph like a billionaire!
find me on instagram @max_madeit
shout out to u/Glad-Parking3315 on reddit for the intro
It's a picture frame I just took the back out
Or is that a phone flashlight under a sheet of glass
A old lamp
I tried cling wrap it was to weak
I just need a uniform white plastic
But I can't think of anything
That I'd have around the house
Get a styrene sheet from one of the hobby shops in Medford tomorrow
I wonder if ace has anything
They might
I still need to find a way to hold my camera straight down tho
Acrylic glass maybe?
Maybe but it's not white
I was thinking maybe a bed sheet
But that's not gonna work
Bingo I'll just cut a little bit out of this paint tray liner
Almost perfect
I could almost use my phone
Hmmm
You can if you have lr mobile lol
Just invert, set the wb and fuck with it from there as needed
It works 🤷♂️
I need a new eye price it yeeted itself at the airport and I couldn't find it in the grass
@glad juniper are my white balance settings just wrong?
This is everything inverted
With the temp as cool as possible
Without adjusting temp I get this
Use the building as white and adjust from there
Eyedropper my friend
Eyedropper
building is blue tho
The building in the bg isnt
lemme find a pic with real white
got it
wow this is way better
i just need to get the film to lie down ttoaly flast
Yep
it looks a lil hazy tho
like this is waht i got back from the shop
okay i think it was just my exposure settings
okay i think ive got it
we're getting really close
Keep in mind it's also supposed to be better than the lab scans
yeah
But yeah it's lookin good
any reccomndatiopns oh how to keep it flat when scanning it with messing it ip?
I've just been using these
All of my negs are pressed when I get them so I don't have curl issues
But yeah that probably works too lol
mine are warped especially the expired film
wow these B&W ones grain is way more noticeable now
Perks of cam scanning or otherwise diying it
It's sharper
Cons
It might look worse now that you've got it at a large res and has more dr than the box the film came in
ive come across something very peculiar
what i thought was sun flare is
light leak
but its not on any other roll or any other section of this roll
Goofy
happened during dev maybe?
I wonder what it was
back to faking aerocrhome lmao
pink
btw if you can't be bothered to use lightroom mobile, darktable is a super competent (free) photo editor - it doesn't have a mobile app though
every time I mess with film scans I do it in darktable
this kinda haze is super annoying to deal with
you have to make 400 masks and dehaze everything, annoying asf
why do all the shop scans look wayyy oversharpened
it almost looks like bad phone pictures
lol yeah
I stopped paying for LRC recently and went full on darktable, I don't shoot often enough to make LRC worth it
the only things I wish darktable did better were masking tools and (AI) denoise
I pay for light room it’s so good because it scans my image and chooses the best preset
Yes, but it always ends up like this for me. (i dont pay for lr and instead screenshot the preview)
Not really, you don't have to do all that much to scans
Assuming the negs good tho
in most cases yeah, I was referring specifically to when you get light leaks or tons of haze
yeah i just color invert them
and then use curves to make it look right
basically instead of just inverting you invert then move the slider to where there's actual color data
you'll still have to tweak them from there but it works 90% of the time for me
My neighbor has a ton of cameras that I get to try it’s crazy
*posts backlit photo
hot take: backlit photos aren't a bad thing and is a bad standard pushed by jetphotos
it's a bit more contextual than that but I don't think backlit photos immediately mean they're bad
you try anything new or different and some planespotter goes “well ackshually it’s backlit”
Yep cancel him
Depends
Sometimes they look lousy
I was really just bullying Maus
It's true he was
I bully him, he bullies me
i work at Million Air now, i didn't have a good opportunity to say so i made my own
No dice at croman or is this just a mean time job
Fair
What film should I shoot this weekend at the airshow
I've got my choices down to portra 160, ektar 100 or ultramax
idk
film i think'
color
film at an airshow is brave
I don't have anywhere near enough skill to do that
porta 160
I don't like ektar
ektar's blues are too much
(I've shot both porta 160 and ektar 100 a grand total of once)
Brother I have 3 cameras in my bag lmao, film is for the statics and maybe some slow flying displays 
ahhh
fair enough
And I ended up bringing the ektar, I want the sky to pop a bit more than portra would give me
I have a samsung dlsr and it's perfect
What mount did smasnug jump on again
Pk?
I do want a nx1 tho
That'd be a lot of fun
Hey maus, most photos look great on my camera screen and I can crop it without noticing a difference in resolution, but they look terrible when I see them on my computer screen. Is there a fix for this or is it just the change in the pixels?
What do you mean by a display issue?
well can you send us the pic
I'm gonna guess your pics are out of focus or overexposed and you can't notice it on the camera rear LCD
heres one example
I notice that it tries to do some auto sharpening aswell so that might be why
that looks fine?
@random prism
for me?
Zenit-e

What's the serial number?
camera at least
I'll find out soon cos it's at my friend's house at the moment
Next time I see him I will ask
Stupid fast portrait lens time
I wish I had an 85 f/1.4
closest I can get is 50 f/1.8
which is basically 85 mil on a crop body
how good is the focusing on them lenses
My friend wants to buy his first full frame Nikon, does he go for the d610 or the d800?
Imo neither, I don’t get spending on a cheaper ff camera, just save for a refurbished 850 or 750
The 600 and 610 have issues so skip those
The 800 is fine
810 would be better if your on a real budget
850 would be ideal
700 is good but it's definitely "old"
750 or 780 would be ideal as well
Didn't they fix the sensor issue with the 610?
i fucked up my settings
i tried to shoot at night but now theres a problem
the thingy where you put your eye to know what your shooting
its blurry
but the photos come out normal
unblurry
mmmmm diopter fuckup
See the dial near the vf?
Play with it
You can adjust the focus of the vf
is your lens cap on
no
is your focus set correctly
yes
can you walk me through what you did
uhhhhhh
i barely remember what i did but i reverted a lot of it
what i remember i did
its not fully black
its like
super dark
i took a photo of my pc monitor and you could kinda see it
do you know what your settings are?
it always used to
why would you ever have it on
its a huge waste of battery life
Ive got a Twilight display at an airshow this coming Friday with CF18s and all that, would you say leaving it on auto is best? @glad juniper
Nah
Set your auto iso limit to like, 1600 I'd say, and then just the normal aperture prio
Throw in some ev comp if you want to play it a bit safe
Underexposing about a stop would be fine
hello i need help finding a camera and a lens
im 15
and this wil be my first camera
pls DM if you think you can help
enyone?
what's the budget?
i suppose
maus and Kaden will help the most
are you fine with buying used?
any brand loyalty?
Yes
yes ofc
im thinking nikon or canon idk
I can help with canon, Nikon maybe? Maus is better at Nikon stuff
Oh
There is only one right answer
a long lens (as guessed)
So maybe something beginner
Yes
for nikon perhaps a d3000 or d5000 series cam
Start off with a Hasselblad I mean uh maybe 200D and like some cheap 70-300 or similar
considering hes a beginner
Nikon errrrrrr idk
your budget is 1k right @pastel sentinel
1k is a good starting point
perhaps (for nikon) a 5500/5600 and a sigma 100-400?
From what maus was saying you gotta be really careful with stuff from japan
I can't remember why
Lol
Im on phone rn
So kinda hard to navigate whit links
IL look at my pc later
This is the lens I use so I can vouch for it as well
Excessive "good" standards and potentially high shipping/import costs
There u go
Also tf sort of currency are we using here
Valid
Can anyone vc?
im using NOK(norvegian but im talking max 1k USD
OK that narrows it down a bit
Good for it's class, shit as a camera
Xd
so not ideal for plen spoting
it's good if you only want to stay in your back yard
lol
im going to airshows
and airports
and i have desided i think i wast nikon
Not even then
It's good if your a grandma who doesn't want to faff with lenses
Depends on the combo imo
A reasonably expensive body and a reasonably expensive lens is a good idea
But generally a better lens would be preferred
Both but to a point
ok ty
Here's a modern body and modern lens
And here's a body from 2008 and a lens from the 90s
Just as sharp
ahhh
ok
nice photos
im looking to use 1 117 american dollars
do i need more?
to get good aviation shotos
Again, to a point
You also gotta learn your camera
I take bad photos too and I've been doing this for 7 years now
wow
do you have eny good nikon combo recomendations?
@glad juniper ?
(sry for ping)
For 1100
Yes ik that's the budget
What are you looking for tho
Absolute best deal or a decent compromise or what
Best deal
Is that the 85 1.4?
50 1.8
@random prism
i think thats my issue
set it to something thats white in frame usually
no not that
in my camera
in LR when i use dropped
its still too yellow
when maxed
i fixed
💀
canon shooter moment
i was in auto
lmao
white blance
not mode
thats before
with new WB settings
after
now this is my issue
its blown tf out
yeah you can fix that
i'm still trying to figure out how you did this
like i said
my WB was all sorts of fucked up lmao
💀
💀
can enny one help me find a camera boody (nikon)(VC
Budget Camera for plane spotting in Mumbai RWY 27 area
honestly for Mumbai RWY 27 all you need is a cheap DSLR, kit lens, and tripod
I'm not saying I recommend getting a cheap DSLR and kit lens, but it can/has been done
like I think almost every pic Anshul Kadam has posted on jetphotos is from a D3500 and 18-55
Yooooo
I need help
I hound camera and lens
Nikon D7100
And Tamron 150-600(the first one 2013)
Is this good?
@glad juniper
I main the 7100 and it's alright
Considering you're a beginner it might be tricky getting used to it
Good body piss lens
Horribly soft, violently mid af performance and just generally clunky
Penny bether lenses for around same price (used)
I use the AF-P 70-300 4.5-5.6 which I got for around £230/$300
Absolutely great lens but I can't send any spotting examples cos I haven't took it to the airport
The D7100 opens a huge world of usable lenses
Penny sharp ones?
esp with the non cpu lens imput options
some of the sharpest ever made by nikon, yeah
Name of the lenses?
the ais 50 1.2 is a good one
55 /3.5
135 /2
the DC 105 and 135
ais 200 /4
200 /2
180 /2.8
28 /1.4 af-d
the list goes on
the AF pin is probably gonna be your biggest advantage with the D7100 over the D3X00 and D5X00 cameras
you could run the 70-300G or the first gen 80-400
Eny one whit like 500 mm,
200-500 5.6
the af isn't the best and its a bit soft wide open
but its reasonably fast
its all of your budget lmao
Honestly now that I think about it you might be able to squeeze an FX camera out of that budget
D750 or something maybe
D810 even
Those would be about 6-700 respectively
Used or new?
used
i mean if you stop down there's not a huge difference
i think the 70-300 is sharper at 300mm and the 80-400 is sharper at wider fls
like 80-200 or something
Бусти:https://boosty.to/pavelppk/donate фото товары:https://alli.pub/6tq5t4?erid=2SDnjeePzAL Телега: https://t.me/ppkyou AF VR Zoom-Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VS Nikon AF-P DX 70-300mm 1:4.5-6.3G ED VR
Примеры фото:https://cloud.mail.ru/public/3jjV/8jJQb3EMV
Группа ППК в ВК:https://vk.com/ppkpavel
AliExpress лучшие товары:http://got.by/34xpj...
thats also the DX version but still
they're functionally the same at equiv FLs and apertures
just depends if you want the extra 100mm
the 70-300 is also 900g lighter
The 70-300 is like 3 times cheaper
Im buying today guys!
TYSM to the pepl that helped me
And special thx to @glad juniper and @teal basalt
It's a pack whit D750
24 - 120mm
70 - 300mm
Camera bag
And alot more smal suff
Awesome
Sick
Make sure the lenses have no fungus and that the shutter count isn't too high
@pastel sentinel
Only used 5 times
Shutter count is under 3k
Realy looking forward to getting it
@teal basalt
That's a great deal
Send a picture if you can
Which 24-120
what is a good budget lens for plane spoting
Yes the /4 is good
USD 1k? (idk)
It's been my go to for edc work
what does the f/4-5.6 III mean? im kinda new to this thing
That's the aperture range
And don't buy the canon 75-300
Any of them
They're shit
Which brand?
any just compatable with canon
For canon probably the 100-400 mkii
this one?
the camera is on its way
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
@glad juniper 💀 do we buy the x-ray box from a hospital 💀
2 at that
Way big tho
thats actually not a bad idea lmao
It looks massive tho
And I don't want two
I could just go pick it up after work
I have the money in tips too
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Smaller but 40$ is wild
Nvm wtf these are 700$ new???
It's 50$ for a 6x6 one new
Im going to an airshow in a few days, and i thought maybe i could rent a lens for that day, does anyone have any lens suggestions? Its for a nikon d5600
And something that would be good for an airshow
@glad juniper @random prism ^
That'd be a maus ordeal
Idk Nikony
You've got four options right? Sigma makes a pair of 150-600s, optically they're pretty similar, the sport has slightly faster optics and is weather sealed, the contemporary is smaller and cheaper. Tamron likewise makes a pair of 150-600s, only the G2 is worth using. The G1 is on par with canons 75-300, horribly soft and slow. Nikon makes single long zoom, the 200-500 5.6, it's the fastest of the 4 lenses, but is also 100mm shorter. The af is solidly just "ok" to boot, but it'll do better in lower light
Personally I've shot the tamron g2 and both siggys and the tamron preforms better imo
That said, however, the tamron is softer on paper and people consistently get sharper results with either sigma
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
@glad juniper this look legit?
I'll offer like 55$
thank you!
👍
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Okay we try this
90$ a lot tho
My memory card adapter doesn’t work anymore… anyone have suggestions for other methods I could use? Transferring them to a computer is the last resort
I suppose it’s because of iOS 18 for why it doesn’t work anymore
id transfer to comoputer then oogle docs?
or onto LR on the computer and cloud sync
I’m thinking of using iCloud maybe
maybe
Photoshop express is free on pc right? Don’t bully be for this but I use the free Lightroom app on my iPad for editing
maus will bully if you even say LR
idk abt PS tho
i use paid LR on ipad it works fine
just lacking fetures
do i need to laugh at someone
no dont scare off the new kids
i guess
yes
im tempted to buy an iphone 13pro max
since my google camera is dookie
but then again
its apple
just get a smasnug 24 or something
expensive tho
ik someone who can give me a good deal in 13pm and seris 8 watch
he was asking 4 or 5 hundred
maybe ill find a used 23
or pixel 9
yeah i got a free 6a with a line
you could get a base s24 for 780
24 ultra has 5x optical zoom
23 ultra has 10x
intresting
I'm assuming the 24 has a better sensor or something then
Ah
ok so it looks like the ultra is normally 1299 but bestbuy has it on sale rn
we call that a "cope"
At this point I'll just buy a Gameboy 👍
have you heard of OnePlus?
A pretty not-so-known company but they're phones are class
Samsung ☠️☠️☠️
@glad juniper
https://www.kentfaith.com/KF09.101V6_76-inch-camera-tripod-with-center-column-and-cellphone-clips
thoufghts?
or
The SuperSlim tripod from Benro is a versatile and compact tripod designed to meet the needs of all types of photographers.
Compact and Lightweight: Benro tripods are known for their ability to handle heavy equipment while still being lightweight, whether you choose the aluminum or carbon fiber version the SuperSlim is no exception.
Specially...
Benro is good
yeah i like K&F it just feels gimmicky
80$ for the benro wirh shipping
or 60 for kf
yeah
im gonna get this open box one
80$ for a 130$ tripod works for me
In this gear review, I go over my initial thoughts on the Benro Slim Tripod, and take it out in the super windy New Mexico desert for some timelapses to see if it can handle the wind as well as my heavy cameras.
Benro Slim Tripod: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B071JYLS7K/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B071JYLS7K&li...
it can hold quite a bit of weight
shit i found a 20% of code too
66$
fuck yeah
Pog
hopefully its not a destroyed open box
It very well might be lol
Guess I can return it 🤷♂️
No where did it say sales are final
And I was about to buy the same one from marketplace without a mounting plate for 90$
Instead of scanning film with a mirrorless camera I decided to change it up. This time scanning film with film.
not what i was expecting
Is there any way that i can make good photos in darker enviroments? Today i went to take some test photos, and they turned out looking like this:
Would a cannon 100mm - 300mm or 75- 300mm lens be good for a starting lens for someone on a budget?
which 100-300
Not exactly sure if have the right name but the cannon ef.
yeah which 100-300 tho
@glad juniper it has like one scratch on the foot other than that's it's brand new
It did take like 2 weeks to ship tho
It does the upsidedown and fits in my bag
Cool that'll make scanning easier
Your phone
Better than a lamp in a cardboard box with the piece of plastic making it white
With film can lids as spacers
I use that as remote shutter tho
Didn't think of that
What now
o
yeah thats my shitty inversions lmao
i maybe buy that Nikon F Thursday
if i can get for 175 🗿
ais?
automatic indexing
ingles por favor
it alows for the meter to meter through the lens automatically
which was the case for mine lol
show
those are ais, yes
ah
but the F needs non ais lenses
o
or ais lenses with rabbit ears
nah not really
its comes with a couple so i should be okay
the big one is the ais lenses will work on non ais bodies but non ais lenses will have issues mounting to ais cameras
ie most cameras

its like 100$ lol
nikkor-S
that good or bad 💀
its quite good for its age
ah
soft at 1.4 but thats to be expected
the 85-205 sounds fun
no clue what brand or F stop tho
im thinking the vivatar F4
Sorry can you please explain what you mean I'm just starting out?
This one
ok so thats definitely not the 100-300
mr maus
would a wasit level view finder be needed...or could you just
not
just use it without a veiw finder
because 100$ is expensive
400$ for the plain prism is funny
still debating if i buy the F
i go see it tommorw
the wlf just helps with contrast/glare
you can definitely go without it
ok
i was told distortion would be an issue
tbh i don't think ill take the F
ive used the FM for not even a whole roll of film
plus the seller is a little weird and i dont really wanna show up at his house with 200$ in cash and he wont meet elsewhere
it'll also have the lil magnifier thing to help with critical focus
which is nice
but also you can flip it
esp the lenses
hell i'd buy one or two of those lenses off you for my own F lmao
bro is going to kill for the 50mm 1.4

if i dont get robbed blind by this guy
its like 30 mins out of town in Jacksonville too
unironically bring an adult
i am the adult
bring another adult
his facebook makes him look pretty old so my guess is he just doesnt like leaving his home
which is completely fair lol
if it dont match too the adress he sent me i dip
yep
and honestly given the market value of the total of the shit you could probably sell it all and make more than you spent
yh but thats much effort
fair lol
we'll see how tired i am after work 💀
take it to dots and get a years worth of film for it in trade in lmao
lmao
its not a bad idea and since you don't shoot much 15 rolls of stock will actually last you a year
if the meter really is shot then that'd be annoying
i also learned the FM has a double exposre switch i think
and all my glass does have rabbit ears
if the F's meter was stored without a battery you'll have a gooder shot at it working
they really are shit images
that doesn't mean anything if gramps forgot how to work the meter
true
tbh if i im not feelin it after work ill just hit him with the had to work late last min
which i have been doing the past couple days
101 and 105 randomly started doing turns today
makes sense