#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 92 of 1
no copies of which survive
In cgel it'd be classified under type II percolation i believe
So you could say it like 'six hundred and seventy-two thpusand, seven hundred and eighty two' or like 'six hundred, seventy-two thousand, seven hundred eighty-two' and yes this is common and accepted in casual speech
Itd also be more common to put the and in the 2nd half but not the first half of the number but both, either, or none are all accepted.
There's a song in the musical rent that is a good example. They sing 'five hundred twentyfive thousand six hundred minutes. How do you measure, measure a year' and that's how i remember how many minutes are in a year haha
to me, it sounds weird without the and
As a professor of linguistics, [it is essential that I be well-spoken and that I be refined in my diction], [as not to] let doubt as to my ability arise.
Is the first part in brackets correct? Have I used the subjunctive properly?
Is the second part also correct? Without the 'so'
(note, I am not a professor of linguistics I'm just making an example sentence to use the structure, lol)
It doesn't sound great but I believe it is technically correct and that the usage of the subjunctive is correct. The part that jumps out to me as being the most incorrect though is not in brackets, its the 'as' after the brackets. If i were to make a more realistic sentence (for the sake of discussion) as if i were a professor of linguistics, I would rephrase it like this.
'As a professor of linguistics, it is essential (that I am/for me to be) well spoken and have (refinement in my diction/refined diction), (as not to/as to not) let any doubt of my abilities arise.'
do you mean verbal tenses?
'doubt as to my ability' is wrong?
Im not looking for a realistic sentence, just trying to use 'that I be', though
But I do want to know how that's wrong
the that i be is correct here
I didn't write the realistic sentence for you, i did it for my own entertainment and for the sake of discussion, as i often do. Just saying because you always point that out whenever I add extra information. And yes 'doubt as to my ability' SEEMS wrong because you don't have doubt to an ability, you have doubt of an ability.
'as to' is its own thing though
Correct
Doubt about my ability
So how does it not work
I suppose it's best to pluralise ability
But I mean otherwise, what is the issue
Cuz im not saying the doubt is 'to my abilities', the doubt is 'about my abilities', and a synonym of 'about' would be 'as to', am I mistaken?
Perhaps it isn't natural to have two 'as'-es in such close proximity
Maybe that's what threw you off
But I would imagine it's correct grammatically
Thanks
By 'seems' wrong you mean it isn't?
i still dont understand the idiom ''as to ''
It seems wrong, as it feels unnatural to say and is not the prefered, common way of phrasing a sentence like that. It may be grammatically correct, as English is extremely flexible, but it's unlikely you'll find native speakers who would use that, and yeah, the double 'as to' definitely adds to that. It's just my advice for it to sound more natural and like a native speaker is saying it, rather than it sounding like an excercize for using 'as to' and 'I be'.
I see
Thanks
It's just another way of saying so, or 'in order to' pretty much.
Can mean either 'so as to' (in order to) or 'relating to'
Two meanings
I'd like to learn about linguistics, but no I'm not that well-versed in it
Kind of just an etymology/linguistics nerd :p
Id have gone to school for it if i didn't hate writing essays so much 😅
when I think of as not to
it would connect with a negative, not always tho
like, as not to cause harm/offence/alarm
yeah, you pretty much can replace it with 'to not', as not to is like, just a more flowery way of saying it.
you can also say, 'as to not' or 'as not to' interchangeably
sorry, I would write full responses and my thoughts etc; im currently in bed on my phone about to sleep, so maybe not
sure sure, hav a good sleep then c:
its almost 8pm here in new jersey c: thanks ^-^
Last month we finally got a chance to have a trip to E’mei Mountain, which we longed to do for ages.It was there that I was amazed 2. the most beautiful scenery I had ever seen! Can I put “at” in blank 2? The correct answer is “by”
Yeah, I asked ChatGPT about it, and it said the difference is really subtle. So I feel like this is not a good quiz😂
Yeah, that’s pretty much what I have found.
Thank you
Yeah, but I can’t quite feel the difference in its tone, especially when it asks you to fill the blank. I think it may depend on what the author is trying to say.
putting "at" in the blank would be wrong
Is it pork roll or taylor ham?
🥹Can you tell me the reason?
I don't know what the grammatical reason is but no one would say "at" in that situation instead of "by"
I know thats not very helpful
Or can you give me a similar sentence using “at”? So that I can try to feel it
I was amazed at how well he played the piano
I got it, thank you
Take your learning to new heights with our specialized Linguix. Gain access to in-depth definitions, explanations, and examples across various subjects and disciplines. Master complex concepts, enhance your academic performance, and excel in your studies. Empower yourself with the ultimate study tool.
Idk it sounds fine to me
yea like what does it mean
He took revenge on the criminal
I would have chosen by and not at as well.
Thanks 🙏🙏💀
I see, just looked it up. I'd never seen this usage before now
In my opinion, the second sentence could be used in a different sense
"She has a beautiful eye for problem solving", though it's unnatural but can be used in some context to imply that "she" is a "keen" problem solver. (Only in a figurative sense)
While the idea in the third sentence can be used like the following
"She has the same beautiful eyes as her mother"
The more you read, the more you learn, right 😅.
wow discord hates you lol
yea xD
I had that thought for the second one too
Anyway, this sentence doesn't feel very natural, how do I fix it?
context: we react on every welcome message with what number the person is lol
there are like 130 ppl there I think
every single*
Yea, there is even an expression "an eye for an eye", taking it as a reference we can form an other sentence
"The eagle has a beautiful eye for snakes"
(Figurative)
I don't see why 'beautiful' would be used
I see 'good' working, 'keen'
but 'beautiful'?
No reason
Using keen would make it a low-key
huh
yea
I don't get what youre saying
but it has the same meaning with the sentence "The eagle has a keen eye", but the first one would not be used in daily conversations
I just don't think 'has a beautiful eye for [x]' works
that's what I'm saying
You could say has a good eye for [x], a great eye for [x], a keen eye for [x]
but why don't you think it works?
I just don't see how beautiful works
in a poetic sense, given there is a context, it might do
ok so i dont really know whats happening, nor do i know english all that well, but from context, im gonna guess that yall are talkin about whether 'keen' or 'beautiful' should be used in the figurative on "the eagle has a ___ eye for snakes"
and on that, i think it could be situational, but idrk- keen would be used in describing how skilled/specialized the eagle is and beautiful i guess could be used as a statement of admiration, but again, im not too sure.
when you have an eye for something, you are good at noticing it. This ability you have can be good, it can be great! It can be amazing, but how can this ability be 'beautiful'
ditto
You are right, of course keen/sharp/acute would be used in that sense, like the point of a language is to get the point across, why would one be inclined to get people confused? But as you know, in the deft hands of a poet, anything can occur (apart from the wrong usage of collocations); we know how intricate, figurative languages a poet uses to animate his poem
uhhh
can i get some clarification on what exactly it is we are talkin about- you seem to have lost me 😅
Yea, you are right, the ability has been described as beautiful by the speaker, as 'beauty' can be subjective
Yea, you are right, the ability has been described as beautiful by the speaker, as 'beauty' can be subjective
Interestingly, the AI of ludwig seems to think it's fine, and it can find 1 exampel using it
Maybe it works, but it must be uncommon
Well more generally about the phrase to have an eye for something
Yes it sounds fine with the right context
To me anyway
(the other 15 aren't exactly 'have a beautiful eye for', just phrases containing all the words)
heres how I would put it- just from rephrasing that sentence (i am no professional, so ask someone else too just in case lol):
"Consider this, everyone. Some of us original members of the server will be the only ones here to have reacted to every single message in #welcome. There are hundreds of members now
"
ok so that was as good as i could get it on my dead brain rn, so feel free to completely ignore/correct/use/do whatever you want with the sentence above.
It sounds weird
You did change the meaning a bit.
when there are thousends
became
There are hundreds now
But this is much more formal that what I was going for :p
but I like that use of 'to have'
i see what you mean- in this context, i'm assuming the writer is baffled by the scenery, not baffled at the scenery. i would think that this situation wouldn't mean the writer was doing the action of or feeling at the scenery, if that makes sense. the scenery is the one "baffling" the writer.
in which i would agree. it does sound rather peculiar
oops sry- i saw you said in a following message there were 130 ppl there. 🙃
also the message seemed like an announcement, so i thought it to be formal.
Think about this, you all. We who've been around from the start will be mostly the only ones to have reacted to every message in #welcome when there are thousands of people here!
I feel this mixes yours and mine well. Do you think it's natural?
yeah that sounds great to me
nono, I was just having a 'think about this' moment
ah, so in a general chat of sorts
yeye
well then in that case, your 'blend' sounds great
thanks 
pork roll 100%. Taylor pork roll is on the package, it doesnt qualify to be ham, north jersey is WRONG xD hahaha
Id consider 8pm evening in the summer when its still a little light out, but, its been dark for hours so, id say night. :p
HEY
how do you studie english
I personally read books and when I dont understand something i look it up in the dictionary or online, and I watch videos about etymology and accents and dialects, but, Im a native speaker, so I mostly learned through school o.o
some things are just purely memorization. some things are pure preference. i think it just takes imersion to get the hang of really
i get stressed because written language is easy to learn but listening and speaking is complicated
well the good thing there is that, well, usually, speaking is much more casual than most writing, so you dont need to worry about rules, as long as the person youre talking to can understand somehow what you mean
what comes first ?
When do I use this structure:
What/when/where/how/which + to + verb
yeah i have no problem with english grammar i'm advanced at that
at least in a 80%
but people use so much words to express something that i stress
well, thank you for your advice @cloud badge
you english people use a lot of phrasal verbs
for example a robber who broke in to steal something
:v
this is a correct observation 😳
should I scare you with the legendary "put up with" :3
are you worried about not usung enough words? because honestly, usually poeple use more words when they dont know what theyre trying to say. the more concise you can be the better. unless youre like, writing poetry or something creative. its good to be concise. My english teachers would always tell us the KISS rule at the beginig of the year. it stands for 'keep it simple, stupid" cuz youll be easier to understand c:
jajaj
alright
hey
by the way
i never understood what is the diference between ''would and use to''
i use to run
i would run
its 'used to' and it means I did in the past but i dont or cant anylonger. Would is about the future. you can kind of think about it like a combination of will and could. I would do something if i was able but im not so I can not do it. I used to be able to. I wish i still could.
when people are asked to do something they cant do, people often reply 'I would, if i could, but i cant, so i wont'
alright i almost got it
theres a good joke from the comedian Mitch Hedberg, he says "I used to do drugs... I still do, but I used to, too"
hahaha :p
a little awkard and funny
yeah, most of his jokes were like that, i reccomend checking him out, he does a lot of word plays
So there is something natives can feel while non-native speakers cannot🤣🥲
Yes
But you certainly can also use 'would' in many cases where 'used to' is used, just like your example. 'would' has a more broad range of uses that 'used to' doesn't have. The way I always say it, the difference between 'would' and 'could' is the same difference between 'will' and 'can'. It's just that 'would' and 'could' are often used in the past or in imaginary hypothetical scenarios.
yeah like : i could help you but you didn't want me to
could you like to eat an apple for me?
they would walked at the corner's road until a truck arrived so close to them they got a shock.
i think the road scene is wrong

*would you like to
I don't think 'could you like to' is ever a phrase you should use.
or could you help me with something
Yes that works
haha yeah
You could say ' could you eat an apple for me?'
They do have their similarities. Let me think
i know shift is related at work
Like, they are almost the same thing, but the abstract image I have in my head for what each looks like is somewhat different
Right, as a noun, you can have a shift at work
But as a verb, the two words are almost the same
so i can use it as it were a switch
Like. Switching is like flipping over or swapping out with something else. Shifting is sliding over to a parallel, but different, function or area.
That's the image I have in my head
So, you can switch the lights on, but you shift to a different gear.
jmmm okay
Because, with the lights, you can change it by flipping the switch to a different state. And with the gears, you change it by moving/sliding over to a parallel gear
I've heard about the textbook "English idioms in use"
Hmm
Imagine you are writing a poem describing the essence of 'beauty' , where you have replaced so many adjectives with 'beautiful' , then it's more likely that you would replace the word 'keen' with 'beautiful' to engage the readers, while even the readers are sure about the poet's awareness of the fact that 'keen' is the most fitting there
There would be thousands of books regarding idioms, but you have to learn their proper usage in context, a book about idioms won't be able to teach you that. You must stick to literature (even reading articles or dictionaries might do) if you want to add them to your vocabulary
can an accent affect english? i mean like how people can understand what i am talking about
Yes absolutely
I am still a beginner in English. When speaking directly I can't respond quickly and I have to understand first. how I can speak directly fluently without stuttering and making mistakes? thank you
but when typing I can do it pretty well
It’s okay to be slow at first as that’s part of your journey, but these are some ways to improve:
Practise regularly, try and speak English as much as you possibly can, if that’s frightening for you at first, you can record yourself speaking and play it back to look for mistakes or use the #🗒|pronunciation channel.
You could also watch alot of English videos and movies, like consistently and for multiple hours and while watching you should shadow what they are saying, repeat after them or while they are speaking
Think in English: Instead of translating from your native language, try to think directly in English. This can help you respond more quickly and naturally.
Hello there! I have a question. How is the "lived" in "a long-lived sheep" pronounced? Please also explain the reason.
Levd
^
its more livd
Thank you. I couldn't tell if it was "láiv" or "rib."
Levd/livd but not leevd
Like the "le" in French but you add "–vd"
Ok Thank you. I am studying by reading ”The Little Prince”.
Is it possible to acces the phonetic symbols in the keyboard?
Maybe if you set up shortcuts to it but not that I know of
Thank you!
ah, ok, no worries
If you learn the alt codes and they're enabled with the language used on your keyboard then you should be able to. Standard us English keyboards should have them enabled by default i think.
Can you write down some codes?
The way you do it is you hold alt, then you use your number pad keys on the right of the keyboard to put in the code. When you've typed each key then you let go of alt and the symbol should show up. If it doesn't work you may need to click the num lock key. If it still doesn't it may be a keyboard language setting.
you can use the ipa keyboard on android devices I think
I don't know if there is a pc eqevelant though
I can't find anything on 'faf' that would fit the context, what word is he saying?
In this episode of Hermitcraft Season 10, Mumbo starts work on the Minecraft mega project that is the huge factory which will cover the giant industrial farming district on the edge of Hermitcrafts Magic Mountain.
ORDER BY THE 10TH (USA) TO GET YOUR ITEMS BY CHRISTMAS!
https://mumbo.store/
Filming channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/ThatMum...
What is the difference between these sentences : He got me through the wall. He got me across the wall.
It won't link to the timestamp for some reason, so check at 13:43
Also the difference between these others sentences : My journey is going to exhaust me. My trip is going to exhaust me. My going is going to exhaust me.
*these other sentences
Ty for correcting me
I listened to a music
And it said
My going
As a trip
At the beginning
I had no idead what it meant
Idea*
But when i translated ig
It*
I noticed it meant trip
As a synonym
the progression of the action
You should study means in general
On the other side
"you should be studying" refers that you should study right now
should study refers to the future, which means you will study
should be studying refers to sth that is currently happening, which means you aren’t studying now and you should do that now
You should be studying is often accompanied by now ztc
yeah, like he said
So my going is going is wrong ?
Thanks
i guess it's more metaphorical than other thing
trip and journey have different meaning
in that context, according to Gemini, "my going" refers the action leaving
Ty
Obviously, if you say it in a phrase like this " My going is going to exhaust me." it can sound awkward
how to write a good thesis statement and conclusion? i find it hard to write it well
What about set off, get out, get away, leave, quit, go out and go away.
Give me the context
that’s in an essay
why is there a space before the question mark again
?
the period is not right either... but technically not "wrong"? it's colloquial 🤔
no that's fine
It's weird but grammatical
My going to the party exhuasted me
for example ^
Now instead of 'exhuast' you're using the verb 'is going'
exhuast 😭
This to me sounds like you plan on going, and plan on what will happen after you go
I can't spell, but that's not my point
point taken
continue on
Oh ok ty when i reading that sentence
I am*
I see it weirdly
It's like, you're planing to go, and you're expecting the exhaustion
My going to the part is going to exhaust me, but I am free to sleep as long as I want afterwards, so it's okay
since 'is going' is really certain, you're very sure that going will exhaust you when you say that
Anyway, this is pretty formal, @flat rune. In day-to-day English, people don't tend to use possessive determiners with gerunds
And using 'going' twice makes it sound weird, but it makes sense and is grammatical
Yeah, it's talking about the action of going
gerunds are like the noun form of the verb, basically, so you can add 'his', 'my' and other possessive nouns before them ('The boy's running was starting to annoy her'). You can do this with most verbs
np
Also What is the difference between these : set off, get out, get away, leave, quit, go out and go away. Sry for all of that, i know all of them except set off.
I can'r express my hating on phrasal verbs
Can't
?
can i ask some irrevelant question here?
set off= begin to go
get out= to leave a building
leave= go away
go away= leave a place
go out= leave a room in order to do sth for entertainment
quit= leave a place (often permanently)
they are quite similar to each other
Depart
Hi guys , I want to ask how I can study literature ❔
wage or salary ?
Books and book clubs
:0000
:DD
Are theu inyerchangeable ?
Interchangeable*
depends on that context
Oh ok but most of time they are interchangeable, right?
Isn't it how one has to do it in windows?
do I have to install it?
Perhaps, what os are you using?
Ah, I am using a mobile phone rn
I don't use discord through lappy
Oh oh, im not sure then, you may have to download a keyboard app that has more symbols.
alright, thanks
Hes using the british slang word 'faff' usually used as part of the phrase 'faff about' which is another way of saying 'mess around' or like doing something that takes a lot of time but doesn't get much done in a relaxed unbothered kind of way
yea, it's a keyboard you install like any other language keyboard
what is it called?
I see I see, than kyou. It makes sense I didn't get much when I googled 'faf'
wasn't sure how to spell it
...
IPA
it's not some app
it's like, one of the language keyboards you can get
wdym
Lol ... for me it remains Taylor Ham. And a sub is not a hoagie either! Lol 😀
well, congratulations, you are objectively wrong and I will fight u over it.
hahaha
jkjk
Ok,thanks 
thoughts on "central jersey"?
hello, I have a doubt about what this means
Iwould say A
How do you describe cereal when it's not crunchy anymore cuz it was left out too long?
stale?
Same tysmmm!
Yup, stale can refer to texture change, or taste, depending on the food, because it's been left out too long or gotten old. My friend won't drink a glass of water if it's been sitting out too long cuz apparently it tastes stale to them.
Tyy
do i have to add "s" at end in a sentence like this - "what does that says about X?" or just the first one - does?
No, just “does”
It should be :
“What does that say about X?”
Some of these questions r like AP English questions 😭
What's AP
Sorry I'm really ignorant 😅
advanced placement
It’s like a type of high school course
Thats harder than it’d normally be
Those are SAT questions
So easier or harder?
Omg the sat was sat this week
🤷♂️
Lol
They r around the same lvl as AP questions
Ap courses r meant to prepare u for the sat
And basically go hand in hand
I see, I'm defo not AP-level English then :/
F's questions stump me sometimes
I don’t think it’s rlly abt that
a lot of people in ap won’t know the answer I bet or they’ll take just as long
Bc the emphasis in courses like tjat isn’t for you to have a super nuanced understanding of the rules and every logical thing or whatever
And instead it’s on like
Comprehension, vocabulary, and literary analysis
Ofc!!!
Anyway, I'm off to sleep. I hope you have a great day :>
Oh but don’t take my word for it I’m in ib (a similar program) so it’s similar but not the exact same!
Same gn!
What is the difference between deduction and prediction?
A deduction usually comes after a conclusion from evidence.
“The detective deducted that the assailant was stabbed by the victim because of the trail of blood that didn’t match the victims.” (Sorry best thing I could think of)
A prediction is usually a future deduction made from evidence. (But it doesn’t necessarily have to strictly be from evidence)
“He predicted that the former world champion boxer would easily trump the newbie who has never boxed in his life”
“He predicted that his favorite team would with their next football matchup”
Hey, wassup, do you guys have any tips for me to learn and practice comprehension and the meanings of phrasal verbs? I already asked for it here, and someone recommended me a YouTube channel, so I watched all the videos, but I still have doubts about it, and idk how to study and practice more and more 'till I master it well.
you would use 'deduced' rather than 'deducted' here. deducing is like taking out (deducting/subtracting) the relevant information from all of the information you have gathered, to come to a clear conclusion. Deducting is more of a math specific word, and means taking away from something. A prediction is more of a guess, usually one based on information you have, and is something you do before you have all of the evidence you need to decuce the truth. a guess about something in the future, while a deduction is more of an observation of the current truth.
what do you need help with specifically? I feel like most of those are just learned through memorizing and imagining what typically goes with what. so, id guess just reading and practicing using them as often as you can.
difference between deduce and deduct
one is to infer
one is to remove
your choice as to which one
Are they interchangeable though ?
...why do you still have the space before the "?" 😭
Dang
nawp
I forget everytime
they're not interchangeable at the slightest
May you give some examples?
i can see your confusion though, because they both derive the word deduction
and, in some ways of thinking, they kinda do have similar meanings
they both end up reducing the whole into a lesser portion
"deduce" is when you are narrowing down the list of possibilities, like trying to determine who is the guilty criminal when starting with a long list of suspects
"deduct" is when you are taking some quantity away from a larger whole, like when a teacher removes points for getting the question wrong
To retain their meaning, i must retain that deduce is for the cops and deduct is for the rest.
🤔
"deduce" is used by many others
i would say it is used when using reasoning and logic to come to a narrow conclusion
ok
Given your confusion between simple words, I deduce that you are not fluent.
there we go
(references to real people are accidental)
yeah, but maybe the meaning is more clear with added context, such as:
"Based on your thick accent and limited vocabulary, i deduce you are not fluent in English"
yeh; my example deserved some context
yeah i just noticed you added context before i did lol
it's okay; both our examples do differ by the word "that", which is something learnable :]
Oh i understood now
For example
I deduced that you killed my mother
I deducted you some ppints because you made mistakes on spelling
Am i wrong?
this is correct
yee 😎
your examples are perfect
Besides i did not make the mistake of putting a space before '?'
Do future perfect and future perfect continuous sound a bit unnatural?
Can I use the future continuous to emphasise how long a future action will take?
ah ok (English is confusing lol)
These tenses may sound a bit more formal or specific, but they aren't necessarily unnatural. They're often used in written English or formal speech to emphasise the completion or ongoing process of an action by a certain point in the future as youll likely already be aware
yep definitely, it's often used to describe actions that will be happening at a specific time in the future or to suggest a sense of continuity
As " I'll be living with my grandpa's house for a week? "
Hi, im currently finishing work - is someone else able to help this person please
when I use "training" or "train". For example " do you train every day or run?" Would the sentence be correct or should it be "training"?
You could say "do you train" or "are you training"
Wassup sir
What about induction. I really can't understand that one
Induction is separate, it kinda means putting in or bringing in
“He was inducted to the national honors society”
“The cold air inductor forces cold air into the engine to make it run better”
I'm pretty sure this has already been explained to you, but I'd like to add that the noun forms of the two are the same, 'deduction'; however, the adjective forms are different, 'deductible' (can be deducted) and 'deducible' (can be deduced).
Interestingly, I can't find such a difference for 'deductive'. It always means relating deducing, and deducting doesn't seem to have an adjective like that
Oh sorry, I didn't mean induction as in induct, but induction as in induce
Both share the same noun form
But yea, like, it seems to be a method of thought?
To induce
And it's somehow related to deducing
But i just can't wrap my head around it
Inducing means to cause something by control, or to successfully persuade
“She was induced into labor”
“He was induced into going on the boring company hike by a reward of an extra bonus salary”
This is what I mean
Induce vs deduce
It's smth in logic
And no matter how much I've read, I've failed to understand the difference
Oh I see
Induce is something that is done to something like to induce labor. Deduce is to reason or make a logical conclusion
So inductive reasoning is that more actively looking for answer while deducing is just observational
Inductive reasoning is like making a guess based on things you notice.
Like you can induce that “all cats have fur” because most cats you see have fur, but it isn’t necessarily true. (You haven’t seen every cat in the world so this is inductive)
Deductive reasoning is making conclusions using info you already know.
Like, you know that apples are fruits, so if you’re holding an apple you can say “this apple is a fruit” and it is true no matter what
Not really. Deductions and inductions don’t describe levels of activity, rather levels of conclusion and reasoning
oh, I guess that makes sense. It's a bit hard to understand. But wouldn't this mean that most of the time when we say deduction we mean induction?
Yeah it can be kind of hard to separate them
“The detective deduced that the crime was sloppy, because he knows that clean criminals don’t leave a trail of evidence to themselves”
Versus like
“The tourist induced that all lions are friendly because the lion he met today was very nice”
The tourist doesn’t know that lions are dangerous, so he is making a guess based on his notices, not from anything he knows
But the detective doesn’t need to guess that the criminal was sloppy because he knows that sloppy criminals leave trails of evidence
The detective deduced that the criminal was an amature from the immense trail of evidence they left behind. The detective then went on to induce the criminal would not act again for a long time, as that crime seemed like their first act of murder.
Have I used them corectly?
Never
We are talking about reasoning not the verb induced
wghat
The reasoning meaning can be a verb
I don't get why three people have misunderstood me when Im obviously comparing it to deduce
I've never asked that question
is it that obscure?
Deductive reasoning vs inductive reasoning isn’t much talked about. Since these forms of reasoning is a concept, then just defining it as a word is confusing
but my question was: whether the sentence has been worded correctly or not
You asked the difference between deduce and deduct. I said that I'm sure that question had already been answered, and just added soem additional information
you've
If i had really asked the question, i'd not have asked it again
You're confusing me with someone else
I didn't say you have
god damn and you call yourself fluent, fuck off. I just gave you some extra info about the words
i don’t think you know whats going on here, its best to leave out of it unless theres actual input
for which i am yet to see
Did you know the difference between the two words before you were explained to?
whats up, this place is a place for questions
yea, that'd be more reasonable
Mate, I told you 'You asked [x], I'm sure it has already been answered, but here is some slightly related information'
I know
But they are getting mad
I never said don't ask
If you hate me, leave me alone
I don't talk to you
theres no telling people not to ask questions
This seems to be just a blown out misunderstanding
maybe take a break from this, and come back later
with the question
They are angry for no reason
I have been arguing with @boreal ingot cuz of many topics
Time to stop that
So, they asked a question about deduce vs deduct. I came 5 hours later, and saw there already were some answers, so I said 'I'm pretty sure this has already been explained to you, but I'd like to add that ...'
And then just added some not directly related but useful info. They understood it as 'don't ask this question a second time' somehow
It hasn't been explained to me
If you don't know the context
Then don't talk for nothing
I'm fed up
you got two answers
so I said that I know it's been answered
Wtf
I Knoww
Time to stop that
I promise Im not saying anything about asking it twice
Why can't you understand me 😭
Liste, let me rephrase
so this misunderstanding ends

You said " it has already been explained to you "
No
It has never
Been explained to me
What I meant was this:
It has been 5 hours since you asked this question for the first time, so I'm aware that someone has already explained the difference between these verbs to you in these past five hours. I would just like to add some extra information about the noun and adjective forms of these words.
It was entierly just a note. I wasn't blaming you
I wasn't accusing you of having asked it before
I'm sorry if I somehow came off that way
ye, i think they misunderstood your intended tone
textual tones are always complicated to discern
😭
I hadn't looked at the end of the message, that is why i misunderstood

Sorry
Indeed. The other day I thought my friend was serious about something, but they were just using hyperbole
It's alright. I'm sorry for getting mad
Scella does have a tendency to sound blunt at times 😔
No problem
Yeah 
lmao yea
In the second sentence of the second paragraph, what is meant by "'un"?
probably this
Oh, well. And "right-down"?
Could be an alternative version of “one”
I thought it would be some informal word
@verbal heron the exact sentence you've shared is used as an example here ^
Look at the adverb form's quotes
here:
Oh, not the same exactly
but 'A regular right-down bad 'un'
is shared between them
A big thank you to both @boreal ingot @zenith ether
I was wondering what 'Work'un' would be though
I don't see how 'Work one' makes sense there
Hi guys
Dickens used "Work'us"
I mean he hasn't used "Work'un"
workers maybe
oohh ohh
I misread lol
I think it's a name
it would make sense
if you're talking to 'Work'us'
replace 'work'us' with any name and it reads pretty well
and it is capatalised
soso that's my only guess
Unless it's an Irish name
The setting is not Ireland
People in England generally do not have such names that have ' in between their names
Is Work'us an Irish name? I mean Ive never heard it, I'm just guessing what it could mean based on context
https://www.reddit.com/r/namenerds/comments/11sbf8a/why_do_some_names_have_apostrophes/
this seems relevant for why it has an apostrophes
Dickens used a lot of colloquials for a literary text in the 1800s
Ohhhh

I'll check it out later
thank you
nevermind that, Akuma's answer explains it well
That isn't related
Here, Akuma linked to this comment:
You may note that a few lines above this, Oliver is addressed as "my work'us brat". Work'us is the speaker's pronunciation of "Workhouse." Oliver (who is from the workhouse) is addressed as "Work'us" in the same way that someone from Texas might be called "Tex".
to paraphrase this without the stylistic accents the author wrote into the speech it would be "she was a regular right-down (people these days say down-right, it means pure) bad one(bad person), And its a great deal better, Workhouse (the name mentioned above), that she died when she did..." etc.
- Does my response make sense?
- Is my response natural? As in, is the sentence stilted?
What does the second part mean??
To stampede is to move quickly and in a panic, said of a whole crowd
They're doing a play on words, where instead of it just running through the family
it's stampeding through
You can't normally use stampede like that
but it's just going off of 'run'
its a little odd to tell someone what they do with their own hand but if youre going for sass that works ok, using "the mean of" is also not the best wording here, its a veeery math/numbers-centric word, and the average youre talking about here is more abstract.
Also since youre saying the have zero impact, zero already cant be positive or negative, so specifying that is redundant.
a double negative happens when you say "no impact" with "not positive nor negative", it makes you think 'no impact that isnt positive" before you read the next part. Id reccomend to replace the nor with or, or phrase it like
"you lose all impact on the average IQ of humans, be it positive or negative"
"you single handedly have no impact on the average IQ of humans, you have neither positive, nor negative impact."
the most clear would be "you have no impact on the average iq of humans, not positive or negative"
No, they said 'I bring down the mean', I said 'you have no impact on the mean'
Cuz they were calling themself dumb
And I was telling them that theyre not
athat theyre avrg
I wasn't really telling them what they already said
oh oh, i thought they were like narrarating an action or something
So here's full context:
Them: I'm so stupid
Me: no youre not
Them: I singlehandedly drop average human IQ by a few dozen points
Me: you single-handedly have no impact on the mean of all humans' IQ, not positive nor negative
Then to make it more natural id say "You dont single handedly impact the means of all human IQ, not in the negative, or positive"
or you could say 'neither in the negative nor positive" but using not implies 'not either' and either needs to go with or, while neither goes with nor
Also since youre saying the have zero impact, zero already cant be positive or negative, so specifying that is redundant.
a double negative happens when you say "no impact" with "not positive nor negative", it makes you think 'no impact that isnt positive" before you read the next part. Id reccomend to replace the nor with or, or phrase it like
So what I was thinking is
You have no impact, not positive nor negative
would mean
You have neither a positive nor a negative impoact, you have no impact
is this not the case?
yeah, just that first example there would need to use or, instead of nor
Why though? I already have a negation?
Not positive nor negative
not implies 'not either' and either needs to go with or. if you use neither, you use nor
either, or. neither, nor
Here it says that it introduces items in a series and indicates none of them are true without mentioning 'neither', but the three examples it gives do use neither
However
This seems to be what I'm using
yeah, if youre gonna combine not with either, you need to combine it with or, or youll get a double negative, if im remembering correctly. sorry im not 100% sure i just remember "either, or/ neither, nor" being drilled into my head in school. id look for more info but i have to leave now, i hope you can find some better clarity!
thanks for your help either way :>
Got it, thanks
I wonder, what is "trans" itself in the English dictionary? I heard some of these combinations : Translucent Transcendental Transparent or even Transgender
It's a prefix used to mean "across"
Or to indicate opposing sides
An example is "transport" which means to "carry across"
"transgender" is used like opposing sides, as in, their gender identity opposes their sex assigned at birth
Translucent and transparent are about light that can be seen across to the opposite side
@vestal hedge hope that helps
Robert wukosky is a great student but that young guy usually steals items from his classmate so he needs to recibe a punishment from the institute , let alone Jhon Kuwowsky, though Annie Eanoewsky is the smarter in the class, don't get me wrong it i just want to coperate for the well being of this School .
Is it well written?
What would be better: needs or must by the way?
It is a horrible text i made myself but i'm trying my best xd
transgender is like, going from one gender to another, its a combination of transition and gender, transitioning from one to the other.
its pretty well written, but its a bit of a run on sentence, and you would only use "smarter" if youre comparing her to someting else. if shes the most smart, youd say smartest. if shes smarter than john, youd say 'shes the smarter one in the class' (inplying youre comparing her to john). and must would be better, it more implies that the person saying it thinks he needs to be punished, but really, he just should be punished.
'trans-' means across
it's transtioning across from assigned to true gender
imo at least
I agree with Ross's analysis of it, and I've seen another person explain it like that too
when I asked about the word in relation to the 'trans-' prefix on reddit
yeah, i didnt specify which one was the persons true gender, its that theyre transitioning their body to show as a different gender than it had before.
going from one thing to the other, but yeah, theres some nuance to talking about that thats deeper than the word transition
Yeah, I see the idea behind how "transition" fits the concept of transgender, but I can't find any source that backs up that claim that the word has this etymology. However, I have found a source that backs up my thinking.
But it's essentially the same idea anyways. It's kind of a moot point
Both ideas work in the end
whats your idea ross
@sacred mirage
i believe it kind of started from cross dresser when the term for them, transvestite, became popular. the trans prefix was then used much in the lgbt community not just for 'vestite' aka clothing but also gender transitioning, but yeah, the 'trans' in transvesitte is transition clothing aka cross dress
Robert Wukosky is a great student***,*** but he usually steals items from his classmate***,*** so he needs to receive punishment from the institute
These are the eedits I'd make for the first part ^.
This part, I can't really understand:
let alone Jhon Kuwowsky, though Annie Eanoewsky is the smarter in the class, don't get me wrong it i just want to coperate for the well being of this School .
'let alone' doesn't make sense there, and I don't see what 'though' is contrasting, I also don't see how this part relates to the first part.
Right, thank you
I corrected the misspelling with a misspelling 
edited
@boreal ingot thank you very much
np, but if you could clarify context and what you meant, I can try to help correct the second part
mostly agree, but heres my take: "Robert Wukosky is a great student, but that young man usually steals items from his classmates. He needs to recieve a punishment from the institute, not only Jhon Kuwowsky. Although, Annie Eanoewsky is the smarter of the two in that class... Don't get me wrong, I do want to coperate for the well being of this School."
the last few sentences dont really relate to the first though, so it doesnt make a lot of sense
saying 'that young' man implies we're talking about someone else
who isn't Robert
no it doesnt, the 'that' refers to robert
Robert was walking down the street, and that young man was eating
^ sounds like two ppl
'That' can also be said while pointing to a young man
I made Robert a star now 
the and makes it sound like two people, but the sentence used but and the context makes it obvious
how is that relevant to the sentence :p
'the young man" would be better though, i do agree
i was just joking that to me it did sound like one person xp
To me it sounds ilogical, like contrasting the fact Robert is a great student with the fact another young man is stealing
it would depend on the emphasis used in the pronunciation of 'that young man'
or maybe you expect that young man to be like Robert, but you're saying that he is not
I think is less modal the way i wrote the sentence , if there would be a Tracher or a Director it would be more modal
Honestly, this type of sentence structure works really well when spoken aloud, where the tone can help provide context for who "that guy" refers to. But written, it's ambiguous who this refers to.
saying the young man makes it more passive, saying that young man makes it sound like theyre singling him out like hes the only bad one in the class or so
yeah exactly, its all dependant on emphasis
Yeah, saying it outloud I suppose 'that' does work
That's quiet well , i wanted to practice the two phrases i learned today," to get wrong someone" and "let alone something or someone"
@flat rune, mind clarifying the second part?
Yeah go on i really apreciate your opinions and corrections
You've misused 'let alone' sadly. You use it when something is less likely than something you've already said. It sounds emphatic
I don't like, let alone want to marry, him
dont get me wrong, your writing wasnt bad, but the topics were a little confusing, let alone the sentence structure.
I am not going to eat a single pickle, let alone a whole jar
[A] is not happening, so there isn't a chance in hell that [B] is the case
kinda like that lol
I think so haha , i read the let alone phrase from a sentence that was like : Basque is getting hard to learn , let alone my chinese
I think 'nevermind' would work better there
however, 2 does match up
It's likely uncommon, though
as I've never seen it, but maybe it isn't
not sure
Yeah that sentence is very good and ahaha kill 2 bird from 1 shot btw🤣
That one is good too
let alone is more about someting you dont want to talk about because its so much more of something than the first thing. never mind is not always for things you dont have the energy to get into a conversation about, it can be used for any related topic you dont want to talk about, usually irrelevant topics.
If you say 'nevermind' with enough emphasis, it can be used like that, but I agree, yea
yeah, the only difference is that let alone is always used with that emphasis, nevermind is not always
Yeah the text i had read was like that
I will talk to them regularly, so they think I'm their friend.
Why do we say 'so they think' and not 'so they will think'?
if you said it like that it would be because you want them continuously thinking youre their friend, not just that they will think youre their friend at some point in the future
if youre not friends yet, or they dont think you are yet, youd say the second
Yeah the first sentence sounds like you were meant
Xd
Like if you were hidding something meant being their friend
I wanna know the answer too, isn't it well written too?
I don't think you need the comma here
Ngl I don't get the explination :<
Yeah, I felt I need t oremove it but couldn't understand why I felt like that
Could you tell me the rule?
I am tired, so I will sleep
do I need it here?
Both of them are independant
and 'so' is a FANBOYS
Cuz it's just a shortened way of saying 'so that' to express purpose
Ig it's more of a subordinate clause when using so (that), so it feels more natural without the comma
This so is the fanboys version to mean therefore
Try googling so that/in order that
Do you have any comment on this? ^ if I could ask
'they think I'm their friend' vs 'they will think I'm their friend'
in that sentence
wft you talking about?
i think the first one it's about a current situation and the last one is something would happen depending if you first say : if i do X they will think i'm their friend , like if it would be hypotetical.
xdd i'm not intermidate so don't even take me into account.
It's right though, have more confidence!
Ah, I had already drifted off by then.Thanks for making that clear. But imo, representing "workhouse" by Work'us" would make more sense if the setting were in Germany, "hause" is the German cognate word for "house"
why do you say by then and not sence then , is it right or wrong the second one?
Here, "by then" means "by the time"."By the time" means "before the time some event occurred". I meant to say "Before she replied to me, I had already slept".
If I say "since then", that means "I started sleeping (right) from the time she replied to me".
like look at the following example: "Somehow we reached the station by time." It is most likely to mean they had reached the station before the train arrived
ahhhh
in spanish it would be in time
but as i can see is ''by''
''by'' has a lot of uses isn't it?
yes, it does
I'd interpret that more like a "by that time"
easier to internalize
yes it helps, thankss
even in my language, it would be "in time"
lolll
Here, has "was disposed to" been used as an adjective or a verb?
I think "disposed" is an adjective here
"was" is just a linking verb
You could replace the phrase with "was inclined to"
it's time to learn grammar
i haven´t taken grammar since much time ago
for a long time*
But the person despised Oliver, so it is highly unlikely that he would be inclined to be friends with Oliver
Hmmm, I think this passage is being very unclear about who "he" and "him" and "his" is supposed to be
It's hurting my head
But I'm nearly certain I'm correct in my analysis of that phrase
Mrs. vs Mr.
was + predicative complement + complementizer + copular (in the infinitive) + predicative nominative 
I would advise against using Oliver twist to learn English rules, phrases, and vocab. It uses very dated and regional slang, spelling that reads more like an accent, and odd phrases that uneducated people might have said at that time to make the story more immersive. It's good for learning how to bend the rules in writing, but not learning them in the first place.
what do you do when you understand 80% english spoken but you can't speak out loud yet as well as (just like*) your listening skill's improved?
btw what is the diference between:
Issue
matter
problem
subject
theme
thing
i always get confused among these words when it is about a ... well there you are ahaahah
Haha, I see what you mean! These words can be tricky because they all relate to "something to think or talk about." But each has its own nuance. Here's a simple breakdown:
Issue 🧾
Meaning: A topic or concern that needs attention or discussion. It often implies a challenge or a point of debate.
Example: "We need to address the issue of employee dissatisfaction."
Key Idea: It’s something that needs to be solved, discussed, or debated.
Matter 📂
Meaning: A general term for a situation, topic, or case that requires attention.
Example: "This is a personal matter that I prefer to handle on my own."
Key Idea: It’s broad and often refers to something important, official, or serious.
Problem ⚠️
Meaning: A negative situation or difficulty that requires a solution.
Example: "There’s a problem with the Wi-Fi, it’s not working."
Key Idea: It’s something negative that needs to be fixed.
Subject 📚
Meaning: The topic or focus of a conversation, study, or discussion.
Example: "The subject of today’s class is World War II."
Key Idea: It’s the main idea being studied, discussed, or presented.
Theme 🎭
Meaning: A central idea, message, or motif, often used in art, literature, or films.
Example: "The theme of the movie is love and sacrifice."
Key Idea: It’s a recurring idea or message.
Thing 🪐
Meaning: A very general word used for anything you can’t (or don’t want to) name.
Example: "Pass me that thing on the table."
Key Idea: It’s a vague, catch-all word when you can’t remember, don’t know, or don’t care to name something.
Summary
Issue = a concern or a debate.
Matter = a formal or serious case, situation, or topic.
Problem = something negative to solve.
Subject = the main focus of a discussion or study.
Theme = the deeper message or idea in stories, art, or media.
Thing = literally anything. 😄
If you'd like, I can give you more examples or help you practice!
Lol that's what AI gave me , i think i wont need you anymore , so i'll stop bothering you for a while xd
What does it mean for someone to get folded?
"To get folded" means to be defeated, overpowered, or knocked down (often in a fight or confrontation). It comes from the idea of being "bent" or "folded" like paper or a chair.
Example: "He got folded in that boxing match." (He got knocked out or beaten badly.)
please don’t use ai to help other people out, its not wise; not everything is correct and relevant
Okay sorry , i'll take it into account
Fold legs? Or get beaten idk...
i mean "to dispose someone to do something" means to make someone behave in a particular way or to make them do that work (found in OALD); that even makes sense as in the previous accounts, The Sowerberries hated Oliver, but had to accept him on the beadle, Mr. Bumble's request. And later, Oliver was offered to co-operate with Sowerberry, the undertaker in his work.
and "disposed" can even act as an adjective in "was disposed to be his friend"
If the phrase had been " was disposed to be Oliver's friend (by Bumble)", then no confusion would arise
The Sowerberries hated him but had to bear with Oliver's presense on the beadle, Mr. Bumble's request
The way Dickens combines multiple clauses to form a single sentence with the help of punctuations-the usage of so many colons and semicolons is intriguing but also makes it difficult to decipher the sentence.
What should I read instead of Oliver Twist?
Is any1 participating for the HCGEC?
What is HCGEC?
I have just googled it. It's a popular writing contest
Are there any rewards for first places?
hie
Yeah
Yup
an Internship with Havard Crimson
- money prizes too
btw if u r willin to register I have a discount code
orignal price for early bird (ends on 15th) is 15$ with my code it will be 10$
how can i pay
paypal or credit/debit card
those also make it so native english speakers have a hard time figuring out whats going on so yeah, perhaps something less advanced, "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee, "The Chronicles of Narnia" series by C.S. Lewis, The Diary of Anne Frank, where the red fern grows by wilson rawls, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and you can watch the movie too, its really good and follows the sccript exactly. Hatchet by Gary Paulsen, the outsiders by stephen king, The Giver by Lois Lowry
hello guys
Question: use first conditional.
- if you ________(meet) john, ________(give) him my best wishes.
Can anyone tell me the difference between involve and engage
In my opinion, "involve" is used when you got invited into an activity, while "engage" is used when you join that activity yourself
Please correct me if I'm wrong
"To be involved" with an activity means that you're associated with it, and probably doing something regarding it - whether that be actively participating or doing something behind the scenes.
"To be engaged" in or with an activity (or something else) means that you're an active participant at that moment (or in the general time frame of the activity)
is visa card allowed? And does this comp take place annually?
i want to join next year
yes to both
the competition will take place in mid 2025
nvm
regional round in Feb global in March
oh nice
sadly i’m snowed under schoolwork because i’m having a critical exam in mid 2025
bruh
which 1
graduate exam
oh
the most important exam in vietnam obviously
r u in highschool?
secondary school
oki
i’m going to high school next year
wats ur age?
i’m 14
tysm
I guess
I have a question about the capitalization of names.
So, okay, wuxia is a genre of Chinese fiction concerning the adventures of martial artists in ancient China.
I am currently translating a wuxia novel. In the novel, there's a kind of herb called the "nine yang resurrection herb."
It's not one of a kind. There are "nine yang resurrection herbs" growing all over the place.
So my question is: Do I capitalize the "nine yang" in the name? Because, in the multiverse of wuxia stories, "Nine Yang" is kinda a proper noun. There are plenty of unique skill names that have "Nine Yang" in them. For example, the Nine Yang Divine Skill. There's also the myth of the nine suns that were shot down by some mythological archer. And I think it's a unique term in Taoism. So "Nine Yang" is kinda a big deal, I guess?
I had been reading "To Kill A Mockingbird" till last week. I had been reading it online; I don't have its printed version. But I've stopped reading it for a while cause of my exams; its intricate vocabulary makes my dictionary, my best friend :))
Are online grammar checkers a good resource to master grammar, especialy articles?
As a frequent reader of wuxia, I say yes. You should capitalize it
Hi i have one question
Mas vou falar em português, pq não sei como traduzir isso...
Estava ouvindo uma música em inglês e o cantor disse "i am yours, e you are my"
Eu sou teu e tu és meu, mas tipo... pq yours? N seria you? Ou your? Porque colocar no plural???
Hi
Hi
If you like weird long sentences connected together with a bunch of semicolons and colons (I do; it's quite intriguing), you could try out Robinson Crusoe
Here's what my Brazilian friend has to say (I don't speak Portuguese):
She also said:
I can confirm that second part
Hoo thanks
By the way, here. She told me to send you this:
No problem
For the time being the books I am willing to read are: To Kill A Mockingbird, The Great Gatsby, The Picture of the Dorian Gray and Anna Karenina
hello everyone, i have a question. is were leaving correct in this sentence?
The answer my teacher gave me is: was - were leaving - fell. And my answer is was - left - was falling
It (be)______ cold when we (leave)________the house that day, and a slight snow (fall)_______.
Well I'll keep those in mind, maybe I'll read one of them some day
yes
Sure; I will read Robinson Cruso after I read the books that do not have so many complex sentence structures
oh so it's correct, right? thank you so much
ah well this is kinda funny to ask this, I still don't understand what's the meaning of "embodiment", is it like eh. To make things from not nonexistent to exist?
yes, "we were leaving" is correct in that sentence
thank you so much
both 'were leaving' and 'left' are fine
thank you 
I've seen one military instruction, and the speaker of the video says: "One important tip because the weapon's weight (...) otherwise the gun could dip and hit the ground clogging the muzzle". Why does the speaker use 'the' article for 'gun'? Even if we see the gun on the footage, isn't correct to use "a gun" or "guns" if we want to talk about guns in general, not about the instructor's gun?
When does she start or when will she start?
Which one is correct and why? I always used to “will start” but now in text i saw “does she start”
When does she start mean when you want to know when she starts at a scheduled time.
She starts at 6 AM ( this is a fixed time or it's in the schedule, she can't change that ), I would think.
Or it's a fact that's true.
Shall I ask Margaret to telephone you when she ?
a. should return
b. will return
c. returned
d. returns
c
are u sure , because im not sure
I thought it was an English test question so I answered as much as I knew. Don't take my word I'm not sure too
D.
i gues this is the right answer but i'm not sure
Hello guys, how are you? So I have a question for you. How can I use gerund x infinitive? I can’t set it in my mind rsrs
Could this be a?
Will return
The answer here is “returns”
When talking about future conditions we use present simple tense not future tense
So it isn’t “will return” it’s returns
I don't see why a wouldn't work as well
“Should” implies possibility or obligation. That changes the meaning of the original sentence
Since this is a time clause (condition based on time) you don’t use a modal verb
Additionally, if you say should it implies that you aren’t confident she will, but that doesn’t make sense in the context of returning.
“Shall I ask Margaret to telephone you when she should return?”
Even then it would make more sense to say
“Shall I ask Margaret to telephone you should she return?” (This implies that you assume she won’t return but in the case she does you call)
@gaunt mango Would “would return” work there?
Same thing as above
Would is a modal verb
You can’t use it with time clauses
And would is used for hypotheticals too
Margaret returning is a real future event, not something hypothetical
He is tired after _.
a. works all day
b. has worked all day
c. is working all day
d. working all day
Ah I see, you are right. Moreover, the structure and idea of the sentence would change if we used “would return”
What do you think the answer is
its d
he is tired after working all day is the correct answer
is this is your english homework or something
no i swear im studying and practice some random questions
no no
i need your help here please because i don't have any idea about it
Joe said, "Let me have a book of fives and one Air Mail."
He wanted to buy .
a. some stamps
b. an airplane ticket
c. five books
d. some stationery
joe wanted to buy stamps;
a book of stamps refers to a group of stamps (stickers you put on a letter), and air mail is a sticker used to indicate you want the parcel to be sent via air (airplane)
why its book and air mail i was confuse
this is very helpful i really appreciate
Could this be a? I need help on thiss
this comprehension is really confusing i don’t know how you’re a beginner
I’m intermediate but this is just practice I use for an exam coz we get similar questions and it’s good if u work on it
Plus I lack some grammar rules and I’m not good at some English vocabulary 😅
I’ve been speaking for my entire life and I don’t think any of these answers are correct
Yes A
Thank you sooo much 🙏
Ik it’s rlly confusing
That’s why I wanted to check with natives here and people that study English
I hate them just as u do too but unfortunately I have an exam on these 😔
A refers to them stopping after 10 seconds, a time period never mentioned in the passage.
B is contradicting because the paragraph refers to all sounds emitted
C talks about a variation of sounds, which isn’t mentioned anywhere in the passage
And D doesn’t seem like it can be correct because the research paper talks about all caterpillars, not individual ones
No they don’t mean if it’s found in the text. They’re just asking which finding could align with what bura and colleagues found
It doesn't have to be mentioned in the passage. It just has to support the text under the condition that the finding is true.
oh I see. it just says if their research is true which statement would support it and since none of that information was included in the passage I just assumed none of them would be correct because nothing would support any of the research made
If the species that do emit sounds only did so during simulated attacks, that would most directly support their claim that said sounds are directed primarily at predators
oh so it works in that way. apologies @alpine gyro I haven’t ever done a comprehension like this one
It’s alright! I been there before : )
I agree with A, also
Thank you soo much 💙🙏
This is after they said 'so I could become a villain and stop needing to sleep' in response to something I said
Is this bit correct?
others' minds' eyes
When we say
She saw two cats in a box.
Is 'in a box' modifying 'cats' or 'saw'?
Yoi
“saw two cats in a box”
"in a box" is modifying the "cats.” part. This means that the two cats are located in a box. If "in a box" were modifying "saw," it would imply that the act of seeing took place in a box, which is probably not what you mean
Is the word “luminous” redundant in the following sentence?
“The sage's luminous words were a source of light for the ragged people of the old town, elevating their daily lives”
Whats the difference between “put” and “gain” when we talking about weight?
As in to put on weight vs to gain weight? I don't think there's any noteworthy difference
Actually, I suppose the former is slightly more informal
I’ve just had a task where I need to fill the space and put “gain” or “put”😭😭 but alright thank you!
It should be 'put on', not just 'put'
So it's probably 'gain'
I don't believe so, no
who even says ' a book of fives'?
Hey guys, does anyone could recommend tools such as programs or apps to make research and improve my English?
google scholar i suggest
Stamps often are sold in booklet form, if the booklet only had stamps called 5s, or 5 cent stamps, itd be totally normal to call them that.
No, that's a good sentence
What is the difference between produce and product
alright, thanks
How does it work?
. You produce the product, so you make it
Or you go to the produce isle which would be perishable food
D because there's "is" in the sentence
Which one is correct?
I'm at the London Bridge
I'm in the London Bridge
The first one
Use “in” when there’s an interior. You can say you’re in the Tower Bridge (the bridge next to London Bridge) because it has rooms inside the bridge, but you cannot be inside something that does not have an interior. So for this, you can’t say in.
Use “at” for a general site, you can be at any location if you are in the general vicinity of it.
Alternatively, use “on” here to say that you are on top of it. For example, if you’re walking over the bridge, then you’re on the London Bridge.
TL;DR
- In - You are inside of it
- On - You are on top of it
- At - You are next to, on top or inside of it
Is there a way to memorise the preposition of location easily?
I see that makes sense. Thank youuuu :>
^
Grammatically correct but id recommend to just use 'in others minds' or 'in other people's minds' because the minds eye is associated with premonitions and imaginations, while 'in other people's minds' is more about opinions and observations. Not strictly but, that's the usual vibe of those.
Well, I'm saying other ppl imagine you as unsleeping, cuz of how dehumanized you are in their minds (they only focus on your being a villain). So it would make sense for me to use the one that focuses on imagination, no?
But thanks for confirming it's grammatical
Its still more of an observation, like it's something that would be logical and make sense for them to imagine. You could even replace it with 'in others opinions' and itd give the same meaning, so yeah, id recommend against the eye, its a mystical magical kind of association with that term, while the other means the same as 'in their view' 'the way they see it' 'the way they think of it' 'in their thoughts'

Hello
Do we often use "in" when we are in a open space?
or just enclosed space?
Yeah if you're talking about being somewhere that's contained within something else, like, im in times square, it's an area of new york city. 'Im in the park' 'they're in the meadow, on the field of clover'
Like, we are in the middle of nowhere?
well, the middle of nowhere is part of nowhere ig

