#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 91 of 1
Definition 1 (verb): ring or echo with sound
Definition 2 (verb): call to mind
Definition 3 (verb): to say again or imitate
Other definitions can be found here
What's the difference between till and cultivate?
till is breaking up the soil to prepare it for planting. cultivate is like a soil management that focuses on the layer of the soil. It usually happens after plants being planted
idk why but here is another difference
yes you can
what’s that. Haven’t heard of it before
This makes more sense
What's different between:
We are going to move at 1:00 AM
We are moving at 1:00 AM
Cambridge gave same definition for both and threw me off
Till: to prepare and use land for growing crops
Cultivate: prepare and use (land) for crops or gardening.
The same thing, but whit another words
college board
help
study
Studied
the subjunctive mood
Something happens in the past, innit?
studied
moving is like 80-90% sure you will do it. are going to move is just about 60-70% i remember
hello what is difference between i will and i am going to
Going to is bound to happen than will when we use for predicting
will can be used to talk about sth with certainty. be going to is used to emphasize the decision
please use simple english
will - you're 100% sure that the event happens in the future
going to - works as a guess / intention
i thought will is not 100%?
I will means you want to and you plan to. I am going either meant that you will or that you literally are about to start or on your way to do something.
I will is a little more vague i guess
so going to is 100%
will is 50%
They both are intended to mean 100% but going to can either mean right now or at any future time. I will is indefinite
Going to is usually more immediate than i will
makes more sense now
Yeah you can replace going to with 'i will' or 'im on my way to'
Depending on the circumstance
Hello folks, how do i go about learning the IPA? i want to be able to pronounce words accurately and further understand the intricacies of the english language. I want to, then broaden the IPA knowledge to assist some other languages too.
I don't know the best way but how i did it was reading the ipa in the dictionary for words i already know how to pronounce.
Aside from that its probably like learning any other alphabet
Ahh... that's thing. I am quite unfamiliar with the stuff. Infact, i came to know about it a couple of weeks ago. Guess I'll stick to watching some yt videos if i ever get the time
Most English speakers are very unfamiliar with it so no worries. I only am interested because i like etymology. DrGeoffLindsey has some good YouTube videos about that stuff c:
I am not exactly worried, i just want to learn it. I'll check the yt video out for sure. Thank you
The first just implies its not 1am yet. The second could either mean the first, or, that it is 1am and you are currently moving but it would be a bit odd to use it that way.
Guys im so desperate lool i need help with this- In sentence - Whistling in the theatre on opening night is unlucky. Is the phrase opening night - participle, noun or gerund phrase i cant tell - i thought its gerund my teacher said participle and chat gpt says noun
this is an advert for which I can stand 😎
"opening" is a participle, as it modifies "night" as an adjective.
it is not a gerund, as it doesn't work as a noun.
however, the entire phrase of "opening night" is a noun phrase.
Yesss that now makes sence omg🤣 thank youu
hi
Are any of the teachers here actual school teachers? im wondering bc i want to ask them something
I was a school teacher until recently. I might even get back into it someday.
Omg could you help me w/ formalist literary theory?
I am looking for tips on how to write better essays using that
"opening night" can be difficult to decipher grammatically. "opening" itself is being used as an adjective to "night". I actually agree with chatgpt on this one. It's a noun. But I may be convinced otherwise if someone brings up a good argument.
I'm not familiar with formalist literary theory, unfortunately. I taught maths and sciences.
guys
when do we say " done "
like
" i done drugs "
and
" i did drugs "
what is the difference between them
and when do we use them
They are the past or hypothetical forms of "can" and "will"
You use "could" a lot like how you use the word "can". It is what you are able to do in some imaginary scenario.
Ohh 😭 im done for
You use "would" a lot like you use the word "will". It is what you intend to do if some imaginary scenario happens.
oh thanks
ross can i add u to my gc
bc
ahh
my friends english is so horrible
same as mine
so everytime we make a grammar mistake
u correct it
I don't mind added, but I don't expect I would be able to devote much time to reading through it
Jane has a sweet tooth. She loves eating ice cream, and her favourite is strawberry ice cream. She eats it often but ___ she eats too much ice cream, she tends to fall sick.
Can I ask if the answer is when or whenever? I am slightly confused about those two, as I search it said when is expected to happen once, on the other hand, whenever is for repeated event
I done drugs is wrong
Your difference of when and whenever are correct.
"She eats it often but whenever she eats too much ice cream, she tends to fall sick." makes more sense because you stated that she eats the ice cream often, therefore her getting sick from eating too much ice cream is a likely and repeating event.
You would say "when" if it is more of a singular event, or not something really repeated.
"Call me when you arrive"
(whenever cannot work here because you arriving won't happen multiple times, at least not in this simple context)
four votes, if you look at the reaction from Alexei
what means freaking out?
how to use the word cut-price?
Cut-price is an idiom meaning a price that's typically well below market value, or very cheap.
"She wanted to buy that new purse because it was cut-price!"
cut-rate is also commonly used
"She wanted to buy that new purse because it was cut-rate!"
"Freaking out" means to lose control or emotion because of extreme feeling.
"She was freaking out because she lost her wedding ring only a week after getting it"
what does lowkey mean ?
It basically means on the down low, or chill.
"I lowkey love Taylor Swift" (The person saying this is trying to keep the fact that they like taylor swift quiet, or more of a secret)
oh thanks
buddy
no one loves taylor swift
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swifties
There is a whole article on this.
Swifties are the fandom of the American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift. Regarded by journalists as one of the largest, most devoted, and influential fan bases, Swifties are known for their high levels of participation, creativity, community, and cultural impact on the music industry and popular culture. They are a subject of widespread coverage ...
"swifties"
love ya
taylor swift fans are like 14 yo or 13 yo
I think the average age of a swiftie is 22
nope
maybe their brain is washed
or girls
alr gn zovixi
ty 
Hey you all, would you be able to tell me what 'disillusion' means without looking it up?
I'm just trying to see typical understanding of the word
Hmmm
Whenever I hear disillusion my first thoughts are unhappiness with a system or structure
so like
"He was disillusioned with how things were run at the prison, escape was possible any moment"
Does anyone here have any experience with the Five stars exam from bright language?
Oh, I've always thought of it as meaning 'wrong perception of something', as in 'he had many disillusions about himself', but apparently it means this??
disappointment resulting from the discovery that something is not as good as one believed it to be.
English be doing that sometimes
flammable = inflammable
there is no difference between these two words
why? idk
Ig it's uncommon enough to not be well-understood
the word
even though most native english speakers don't encounter it very often, you can define words just by how their placed in context
a song i listen to often is called "disillusion in a discordant system"
it might be tough for newer english learners but in contexts it helps natives or fluent speakers understand words without looking them up or hearing them before
self disappointment
you thought you were good, but you aren't
Yeah I normally do that
but I couldnt do it this time around for some reason
I'll share the vid one sec
Not enough context is my guess
Here’s one, without googling it, do you know what the word cajoled means?
If not here is a sentence that could help provide enough context.
“She was cajoled into coming with her friends to hang out, even though initially she didn’t feel like going”
https://youtu.be/LcOsWZWFLr4?t=98
it's 2 mins in, but I start the clip at 1:40 for some context
Get Nebula using our link for 40% off an annual subscription! https://go.nebula.tv/talefoundry
Or click here to watch any episode of Worldsmiths: https://nebula.tv/worldsmiths?ref=talefoundry
—
...is not being scared of it.
▬▬▬▬ Tale Foundry Community▬▬▬▬
Support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/TaleFoundry
Come join our community! ht...
I'd suggest watching the first 1 min also, but idk
do what you think is best
Versus a sentence without enough context for the word odium
“She had a deep odium for him”
I think I know cajoled already, jusst vaguely
but yeah that context helps greatly
eliminates my doubt about the meaning
Id guess reverence/respect but no idea
Right. No context
Odium basically means hatred
ah, looking it up, I was wrong
I don't think 'self-disillusion' means self disappointment here
Im struggling to get it tbh
ogh alright, I can try to transctibe it
I’ll be home in like 3 min you don’t have to
Hey. I have a question surrounding grammar in poetry. I am actually not well-versed in poetry at all, especially English. So, I am also unsure whether there are even fixed grammar rules when it comes to it. If I write a part in a poem which I want to be read quickly or in one go, but it concerns two consecutive adjectives, would it be grammatically correct if I removed the comma in between them to achieve that effect?
When he says cosmic bliss he means that sort of stuff where a character is influenced by a being beyond and wants to be sacrificed to them, is excited at the prospect of being one with them, rather than being terrified. An example he gave was a magical flame that enchants people with its beauty, and they start throwing themselves into it.
Here is what he said:
The comment section on that video didn't quite agree. A lot of you said that this whole cosmic bliss thing freaks you out, that it's weird to see someone run toward this kind of horror, weird to see them not just unafraid, but excited. The overwhelming sentiment is that this sort of unwilling euphoric excitement about the prospect of self-disillusion is somehow scarier than cosmic horror itself.
"This exciting, euphoric prospect of self disillusion"
in this context, self-disillusion refers to shedding misconception or illusionment about/with himself.
So the speaker is happy to remove misconceptions they have about themselves
It's used really oddly because disillusionment has a negative diction
this is like
a term called paradoxical
where you kinda make a statement that contradicts itself
i think thats because he is using it paradoxically
so for this context, self-disillusion just refers to how we treat ourselves and our own internal truths
but how does that have anything to do with the idea of 'excitedness about sacrificing yourself to a cosmic horror' being scary
I mean, how do our beliefs about ourselves factor into this at all
I feel like this has more to do with philosophy if anything
here we are basically just comparing self-disillusionment, or the eternal truths about oneself or values, to cosmic horror
self-disillusion = making yourself aware of your misconceptions about things
right?
yes but that's not necessarily how it's used here

here, self-disillusion refers to confronting truths about oneself, or their illusions
like
lets say, idk, Jimmy has a problem with lying
he lies all the time, whether he wants to or not. Not even intentionally he just does
Over some period of time or self reflection, jimmy self-disillusions himself from his idea that he is always telling the truth and realizes that he unconsciously lies
you can do this, yes
"The moon was a bright, sparking light in the sky"
"The moon was a bright sparking light in the sky"
it works better if the adjectives are closly related
"The desert was a hot rough landscape" (doesn't make as much sense since hot and rough are not similar, but most people will still understand it)
And if I added an extra space after a comma, is this usually achieved for a slower read in transition?
I see, great
Can you clarify here?
okay taht makes sense. But idk how it factors into the overall theme of that video. Running at a cosmic horror will not help you disillusion yourself and learn how some ideas you have about yourself are wrong
The way i interpret it is that, running at a cosmic horror (ie, doing something with no purpose or no real end goal?) won't help you realize your true self and won't comfort you from any lies you have made about yourself
"The moon was a bright, sparking light in the sky"
you don't usually add more than one space in english
Hm, I think I kinda get it. It's hard tbh
It can be. Understanding this subject would be difficult in any language, though
?def cosmic
Definition 1 (adjective): inconceivably extended in space or time
Definition 2 (null): of or from or pertaining to or characteristic of the cosmos or universe
?def universe
Definition 1 (noun): everything stated or assumed in a given discussion
Definition 2 (noun): (statistics) the entire aggregation of items from which samples can be drawn
Definition 3 (noun): everything that exists anywhere
Other definitions can be found here
For example in my bio I have this short poem.
It reads in the end "How vacuous, fallacious, audacious and shameless"
There is an extra space after the second comma, because I intend for there to be a slightly slower read in trasitioning from fallacious to audacious. Does this work grammatically, and also is this usually done (the use of an extra space) to achieve this effect of slower transition in reading? I hope this makes sense, ha ha.
yea, sometimes I don't know if the problem is with my English or what
Adding a double space is generally not used. From what I know, double spaces were common after periods in older english (like during the typewriter era) just for formatting, but otherwise double spaces in english are generally not used for any purpose, including slowing down someone reading
most people who see a double space would assume it was a writing or printing mistake
adding commas already makes the sentence a slower read
Unrelated, but wouldn't it be better to swap around shameless and audacious?
cuz that way audacious and fallacious rhyme
All the words rhyme though.
What she means is that fallacious and audacious rhyme a little better than shameless
(-acious ending compared to -less ending)
ABAB rhyming structure is super common, including in poetry
vacuous does not rhyme, nor does shameless
but yeah, Zov has explained what I meant nicely
(can I call you zov?)
(or do you prefer another name?)
Call me anything you prefer to call me
zov works fine too
Actually yeah, vacuous doesn't rhyme. I missed that. But that's fine. Also, I appreciate your suggestion. I do think you are right but I want to have shameless at the end.
fair enough, it was just a suggestion
Do what you think is right for your poem
Have you written any poems by chance?
In English.
Which one sounds natural?
I am able to see you
I can see you
2nd one
first one sounds excessively formal
I'm not much of a poem writer. I've tried but have failed to get satisfactory results
Thanks
Ah all right. I thought you could maybe just give a 1-10 rating of my little poem.
yea, Im not a good judge for that, sorry :>
In all honestly, I would give it a solid 5.5/10 (even though I'm not a super experienced poet myself)
All good
it rhymes, which is nice, however I think the wordplay is too complex for most people to easily digest
"ignoramus" i haven't heard in a very long time
it's just personal opinion tbf
like Scella said, if you want it to be that way then it's 100% up to you
I chose this worldplay because I wanted it to sound deep really
So if you noticed this, I think I achieved that
mmmmm
I still value that
I think having a really deep meaning to your poem doesn't necessarily mean it has to use complex words
If you want to read some good english books that have really good deep meanings, i recommend the crucble or the lord of the flies
True, complex and deep aren't exactly the same
even though they are more major themes that arc over the whole book, they still convey their meanings in a really good way
(which is why they are a staple in basically every american highschool english class lol)
Surprisingly that's one of my fav words lol
In this poem or in the langauge?
In English lol
I like that word a lot for some reason
In the poem, I like 'vacuous'
I don't see 'vacuous' much
my favorite is nefariously
I like the word mesocosm. It's like playing ping pong with your tongue.
I will consider them. I am recently looking for stuff to read, too.
'metathesises' is funny
I will say, the crucibles deeper meaning pertains to a very specific event that happened in the US when the book was written
very coolio reference from the author
I suppose I can download them as PDFs?
How can I look for other servers in the mobile application?
can't
only possible on pc
or browser discord
Wow, that's so weird
If you get an invite link you can join though
so you can look up servers
or ask someone on pc to invite you
I was about to look for a programming group or server
But I'll do it the next time I use the web browser in my pc
Through chrome
Are you all here to learn English? Do you speak by voice? Or just text?
Not all, some of them are here to help other people
I'm here to ask questions and answer what I can
To help other people with what?
What kind of questions? Ask one
I am partially here to socialise tbh. 
To help with what they need help with
No, like, English questions lol. This channel is for asking questions about English
same ngl
Oh, I understand now
I've DMed you the link to a programming server I found
Idk how good it is, I just joined to send you a link
Through chrome, you can join any server you want to
Thank you, you're too kind
with the help of disboard *
Discord as a website also has the discovery function
So you could use that
Well, I'm going to do a question about English, what's the difference between shall and should
Low-commitment socialisation
commitment kinda difficult
oh, thanks for telling, I was unaware of that
'shall' and 'should' are both auxiliary verbs, 'should' is the past form of 'shall'
'Shall' is used in case of the sentences in future tense .
While with he/she/they/James/Jane/it, you use 'will'
'Shall' is like 'will', 'shall' is for talking about the future in a strong and determined way ('we shall be on our way'), or imposing restrictions on someone ('you shall not steal')
'Should' is used for suggestions ('You should not eat that') or to express that something might or might not happen, something possible ('If he should speak rudely, punish him'), it can also be used when something is likely ('This should do the trick)
lol you didn't even join the server 
he doesn't have to
Ye, not saying they must join it. They were looking for a programming server, but they're on phone so they can't locate one. I just gave them a link to the first one I could find and was expecting them to join and, if they didn't like it, ask for another one's link
what if they are planning to join later
maybe they are, who knows
right.
not sure what the problem is
it comes off as rude when you say "you didn't even join the server"
i know the emoji there is meant to negate it but
tiny
Well, I'm sorry for coming off as rude
i understand
and i know you didn't mean it that way
i was just giving you a hard time

That's exactly what happened
Yes, I saw the vsauce video he uploaded like 12 hours ago 😈
ye thas where I learnt it from
that was really coool
it seems they have two names though
semordnilaps and emordnilaps
One is just plural of the other
nono, like, 'emordnilap' is 'palindrome' backwards, while 'semordnilap' is 'palindromes'
But both can bcome plural
as in
emordnilaps
and
semordnilaps
they both mean the same thing
I prefer the on vsuace talked about cuz it makes sense to reverse the singular, not the plural
but they both are used it seems
wikitionary has pages for both
Are must and need to mean the same?
Oh the key answer must be wrong then
It says the answer is when
I answered whenever
What is the diference between sake and profit?
This is the third time you ask the same question.
#📚|english-questions message
he may suffer from alzheimer
Sake is the reason you do something/your purpose in doing something.
Profit is just positive monetary returns you get from an endeavour that you invested in.
Sake is also a type of alcoholic drink from Japan
Not that, I'm a bit absent minded
I'm not sure if it's a real word
Yeaah i watched anime too :v give me a delicious sake my dear waiter
ye alr felt it in my bone lol (consider that as a joke i don’t intentionally want to hurt you)
I actually first heard about it from a yt short lol
I don't remember hearing about sake in anime, but I probably just passed it off as 'some alcoholic drink'
Which one sounds natural?
Would rather or would prefer?
I remember talking to this Korean guy, and he said that in Korea they have a drink also made from rice but it's called 'Soju'
That was interesting
Both are fine
I think 'would prefer' is a trifle more proper, but not much of a difference between them at all
Do "would prefer" sound specifics than "prefer to"?
btw, 👀 ^
A drink made by rice? 
That's what sake and soju are made from?
It's not made by the rice, the rice is used to make it, though
if that's what you mean
I didn't know that
Uh what
Likr a squeezer ?
no idea what you mean
'made by rice' means 'the rice made it'
as in, the rice acted to make the drink
So I wasn't sure if that's what you meant
cuz no, the rice doesn't make it lol
I mean i thought thr rice would squeeze the ingredients and so
You've asked about them before. Told you the same thing, 'would prefer' is a but more formal but they're basically the same
I never said it was made by rice lol,
I sadi it was made from rice
Now I'm just imagining rice grains running around putting grape in a barrel 😭
I don't understand this question, sorry
Jajaja
Sorry
I'm not used to involve with a vocabulary like food and making things
It's like i jumped that part and learned the , let say , philosofical words
For example righteousness
Yea it's alright. When [y] is made by [x], that means [x] does the action of making [y], but when [y] is made from [x], that means you use [x] to make [y]; [x] is one of the main ingredients in/constituents of [y]
ah that's fair, I can barely talk about food too
My food vocab is smol
but my whole vocab is tiny so eh
My problem is that i'm not involved about food or the most common words, because i don't find where to learn them because in the mayority it is learned in a daily life like doing things and i don't live in an english countrie so it's dificult to me.
Now i got you , ha you are good at teaching with illustrations
yea, it took me 5 years to learn what a spatula is for that exact reason 
Really? Hahaah
yea lmao
One day my friend started talking about a spatula and I was like 'what on earth is that??'
Also when it is about someone who talks about a place like a river where is a tourist's place and the guider start using unknown words for me to describe stuffs that are involved with the place it freaks me out, that is the same with al the places and situations where words are going to show up and better you know them cuz if not you are in a big problem :"v
That can be solved with books or documentaries I'm guessing, but I don't watch or read so yea 
Yeah we gotta work hard
I want to get a certification
Later on
Good luck!
Thanks , but i know it will cost a years to be prepared
is "Spend my days doing X for the rest of my life" a tautological statement?
can anyone help me with this, I just need to put these words into an ascending order based on these words
I don't think so
If you had said
Spend the rest of my days doing X for the rest of my life
Then yea
but since you can spend your days doing something without necessarily spending all your days doing it, you aren't repeating the same idea twice slightly rephrased, cuz the 'for the rest of my life' introduces something new to the sentence
thanks for the explanation! had me stumped for a little bit lol
No problem
Hi, we can’t do work for you here. Why don’t you give it a go and then we can guide you afterwards - I look forward to seeing your effort!
omkie
I already have answers
hope you can read it
Idk, I'd probably switch mumble and whisper, and scream and shriek
But I'm not sure
I agree with the order they are in, I think what Scella said would also be correct. These can be quite subjective
Is frosty really warmer than chilly 
mumble is more just incomprehensible sound, whereas whisper is just really quiet
who on earth makes those exercises
oh i didnt look at the others
or wait I had it reversed in my head
they got it right lol
Nevermind that, I had it the other way around lol
I can't really read the first :p
they don't seem that useful, but idk, maybe they are
Ive never done them so I can't judge them well
snail-like, sluggish, slow, swift, blistering, rapid, quick, speedy, super sonic
hmmm, maybe this?
snail-like, sluggish, slow, swift, quick, speedy, rapid, blistering, supersonic
Im not sure about quick vs speedy
but blistering is pretty fast I think?
and rapid is also pretty fast
ngl I really don't like this exrecise
ohh, I see
it's ignoring the main use of these words
none of us do haha
thanks for the help btw, really appreciate it
When we want to explain rules of a game, for example chess, why does some souces use indefinite article "https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_(chess)" while some sources use definite article "https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_(chess)" or use no articles "https://www.dummies.com/article/home-auto-hobbies/games/board-games/chess/knowing-the-moves-that-chess-pieces-can-make-186936/"?
np
What's different between these sentences?
He will die if he doesn't get treatment
He is going to die if he doesn't get treatment
In meaning there isn't any.
The first one just uses "will" to state the future instead of "going to".
I know only about the latter case and to put it simply it's a matter of style. I often see it in documentation when people want to be as concise as possible
I saw lots of natives used be going to with conditional form
I think in this case saying "going to" is more common.
That's all though. In meaning there aren't differences.
What is different between these sentences when we use them to give order and command?
You will give it to me
You are going to give it to me
Will is going to be more formal here.
In some contexts, “are going to” can be planned ahead while “will” is spontaneous, or unplanned
“After you do that, you are going to give me the baton.”
“You will give me that toy, now.”
I mean we use these sentence to give order and command
That's just the future tense, the imperative is for commands/requests
e.g.
Give it to me
Oi lads
Did someone try to scam us?
Anyway
What is different between:
It's supposed to rain
It should rain
Both used for expectation
be supposed to is to indicate an expectation based on other people, while should is to indicate recommendation.
hope this will answer you
personal recommendation*
None of them is correct.
So, what's the right answer then?
None of the choices fit the context of the sentence.
What was the question 
Is this A?
Yeah it's A
If you're wondering why it's not B, which was my first idea, that's because the sentence after 'however' isn't independent
I think the same would apply to C, but idk if it's ever proper to use a full stop before it
What was it ?
A link which hacks your computer ?
What is the difference between these sentences : Yesterday, i was on the road, going to my house but when i arrived i saw my house burning, so i called the fire-fighters. Yesterday, i was on the road, going to my house but when i arrived i saw my house burning up, so i called the fire-fighters.
pretty much the same thing
burning up somewhat suggests a higher severity to me but generally speaking it has little to no effect on the overall meaning
I felt like it’s a also because when I’m saying it it feels like it’s in the middle of one sentence . It’s like a unnecessary pause in the middle of the sentence that’s why I used the one with two commas. Tysmm 🙏
Yeah, you're not supposed to start a sentence with 'However'.
yea?
It's a conjunction so you're not really supposed to. You can casually, and it's very common, but it's not formally correct.
I'm pretty sure stuff like this is fine formally
There are not many who are privy to our past research; however, it will soon be made public.
Why a semicolon should be used over a comma here is that both clauses are independent; however, in F's example, the second clause was dependant, so we had to use a comma
Do correct me if I'm mistaken
Hm, I'm not 100% sure either but something about the second sentence being an independent clause seems wrong to me because of the use of 'it' referring to the research in the first clause. I could totally be wrong, but the semicolon just doesn't seem right to me.
it's independant in that it can stand on its own
Contextless, it wouldn't make sense, but it wouldn't need any other sentences to be grammatical
It will soon be made public.
On its own is a correct sentence
you need not have anything else with it
So yeah, it is independant
I feel like the context and the conjunction makes the difference. If the sentence after the semicolon started 'it, however, will soon be made public' i would agree about the semicolon.
your sentence is the same as mine, just with the adverb in a different position
Yes and im saying that the position of the conjunction in this case is what makes the difference with using a semicolon or a comma.
The position changes nothing
The reason being, if you could use a semicolon there, you'd be just as correct using a period as well and they are both options. It really depends on if you were taught to not start an independent clause with the word however. That's how i was taught but its not a universal rule, more of a formality.
The semicolon links two indepenent clauses, and the adverb makes the relationship between the two clauses more evident
It changes what word the sentence starts with. This is what i find when researching the rule "according to traditional grammar rules, you should not start an independent clause with "however" as it is considered a conjunctive adverb and should typically be placed within a sentence, usually with commas on either side"
If you want to start the independent clause with however and not follow this rule, a semicolon or period would be correct.
Conjunctive adverbs link sentences, so they often are supposed to come at the start of the second sentence. What people advise against is having 'However' after a full stop specifically
Yet even that 'rule' is more of a suggestion
But if you were to separate the clauses, however would be at the start. Thus, a semicolon shouldn't be used because an independent clause should be able to stand as a sentence on its own
But yeah that's only if you follow the 'don't start a sentence with however' rule
The semicolon makes it into one sentence, though. That means that the conjunctive adverb isn't at the start
You could argue that if we were to separate the clauses it would be incorrect to have 'however' there, but when a semicolon links them, they're one sentence, and 'however' is just the link between the two parts
It's pretty well established to use a semicolon before conjunctive adverbs
When however is used as a link like that its supposed to have commas. That's what i was taught.
Because an independent clause should be able to stand on its own as a sentence. 'It, however' would stand but according to the formal rules i know 'However, it' would not.
Because of the difference of emphasis on 'it' the clause is not strong enough to stand on its own when the sentence starts with 'however'
Yes, unless it's the link between two independant clauses; then, it has a comma at one end, and a semicolon at the other
Just like any other conjunctive adverb
There is nothing banning you from starting a sentence with one
People who say it's wrong are stuck with old conventions
It will be made public.
Is as much of an independant clause as
However, it will be made public.
And likwise for
It, however, will be made public.
They're all independant clauses
But when the second clause contradicts the first, you do not use a semicolon, its not a strong enough clause to stand on its own that way. And yes i said it was casually correct but formally not according to some. Just like the oxford comma.
If they can stand on their own, they're independent. If both are independent, then a semicolon can be used. The adverb plays no role here
Do you know what an independant clause is?
The way i was taught, the second sentence does not stand on its own but yeah it depends on the level of formality you're being taught.
No, obviously not, what it is/s
The 'it' in the sentence, to me, is not strong enough to make it independent.
You can disagree but at this point its completely opinion based. It depends on formality. That's all.
Okay, assuming you do know what an independent clause is, what makes 'However, it will be made public' not one? It has a subject and a predicate. I could ask if that sentence is grammatical, and I would be told yes. It may be missing some semantic context, but that has no effect on its status as an independent clause. So why wouldn't it be one?
Independent doesn't mean 'strong sentence', it means that the clause can grammatically stand on its own without needing any other clauses.
Being able to stand on its own is the strength.
Semantic strength of the sentence isn't a factor
I don't understand this part, could anyone explain it
These are syntactic catagories, semantic strength plays no role
You can use 'should' for predections when you want the thing you're predicting, is what they're saying. You can't use it for unwanted things
These wanted things can still be bad, it's just that they have to be wanted
The 'it' relies too strongly on the sentence before it when phrased as its own sentence, so it doesn't make sense to consider it independent, in my opinion. If you think it does, use a semicolon or a period. I wouldnt.
Oh I see
Thanks
Let's drop this. You evidently are conflating the semantic strength of a sentence with its syntactic standing as dependant/independent, and I'm sure neither of us will be convinced no matter how long the other rambles on
This hopefully clarifies my point. In the examples 'Because of the weather' is used the same as 'however it' and 'The weather caused' is like 'It, however'. The strength of the subject is what makes a sentence dependent or independant.
the second half would have to refer to the research: 'however, the research will still be published'. 'however, it will still be published' is not complete enough to me. if you think it doesn't matter then lets agree to disagree.
i hope so.
There are many versions, and even though [there do exist two versions] with [x], most versions don't have it.
Is this sentence correct you all?
Is it natural?
'There does exist two versions' is more natural
I see
Is that grammatical?
To use 'does'
Formally, would 'do' or 'does' work better?
Does would work better, there is like using he/she/it in that sentence so you'd need to conjugate do to does.
But we say
There is one
and
There are two
so obviously the verb conjugates acording to the number of what follows
So why wouldn't we do that with 'do'
and 'two versions'
I'm not sure 'does' sounds better, but it doesn't sound wrong in an informal context to me
I'm asking specifically about the grammar of it
There does exist is the emphatic form of there exists. The do/does is only there for emphasis. There is one and there are two are both like saying 'there does be one' or 'there does be two' and you can replace be with exist.
This tells me nothing about why 'there do exist two versions' is wrong though?
We use 'do' emphatically often ('They do like it'), just like we use 'does' and 'did' ('She does want that' and 'They did do that'), so what makes my emphatic 'do' there wrong?
There is treated like a location or a state of being so its singular. It would need to be plural to use do. They, we, groups, people, do. there, that, he, she, it, everyone, does.
I've been trying to say this sentence with both "does" and "do" in my head for a while now, trying to decide which sounds more natural. I'm okay with either one, I think. I'm actually struggling with this one though.
Technically, I think "do" is the more proper and formal way to form this sentence.
But I wouldn't be surprised to hear people use "does" like this in natural everyday speech
I'm pretty sure 'there' is a dummy pronoun there
I see I see, thank you soo much 💜
Ty for replyingto me
Is this b or c
What's your learning source ? Any book ? Any website ?
Or a paid course ?
guys i have question based on your understanding, dont look up at google or else, i need ur personal understanding about What is Pragmatics?
Is "pragmatics'' even a word?
pragmatics is like the study of language, part of linguistic
hm, okay
no cure
it's supposed to be
For "cape," however, the editors chose the C) novelist Lan Samantha Chang, author of Inheritance.
this can also be written as
For "cape," however, the editors chose the novelist whose name is Lan Samantha Chang, who is the author of Inheritance.
LOL
why are A) and D) the same 💀
Hey advanced people , how did you get to achieve c1 from b1 and how long did it cost you ? Please i want your answers
6 months are possible
Hi, can anyone tell me the difference between jew, jewish and hebrew. And can hebrew be plural, like hebrews?
Except if your language is composed by another alphabet
Or if your language is different from english
From b2 to c1?
from b1 to c1 is quite hard for non english speaking country citizens
What is your level?
Wvat about the french speakers ?
Is it easy to get c2 ?
Me i'm french and i haven't struggled to learn english
hard to say
for some it’s easy but for others, it’s hard
ig b2+
Nice, do you learn it yourself or you attend some classes?
both
i attend some english classes after class and self study at home
How
Me too, but mostly i study it on my own by watching youtube videos and chatting online
I dont know whether i already achieved B2
well it’s a good way to learn
Can anyone help me with it?
The only thing which is hard when lezrning english is phrasal verbs
That's so right
true
i can’t remember phrasal verbs
I'm using anki for phrasal verbs
It is the only way to learn the mayority
There are anki cards on google you can look them up and are made already to be used
I mean , anky phrasal verbs cards
jews are considered as hebrew, but not all hebrews are considered as jew. And a jew is the one who practices jewish religion
i read book and note down phrasal verb that i see lol
And jews are the only tribe who has persisted
The other 11 tribes are lost around the world
and pronounciation
i’m sucks at that too
I'd say, it depends on the people
And for the oral comprehension, i can understand english speakers but i can't understand the tv, the songs etc
That also happens to me
And i already know why
So Jew is a hebrew who practices judaism?
Can u explain to me why can't we understand the tv etc ?
I might have an idea
Because we speak the colloquial english
But not the normal english
On youtube when you listen to them you understand what they are saying because they use to speak with a exposition vucabulary so you are more used to it , but i tv, and series they used to speak sentences that you never heard nor the composition of the sentence and also if you miss a word it will be more dificult tu understand what they are saying , and that is why i'm going yo be serious with english and i'll set a goul with several topics to involve myself in its vocabulary
theoretically yes
It'll be hard
We do not live in english countries
I wish i was an english speaker
I recently realized it watching Men's serie on Prime video xd , they spoke a lot of sentences that i didn't see before, and these sentences are the most useful to us because that is what's going to help us at being able to speak a real life situation or at least to understand what a person is talking about when you were going to give an advice to the deal's person ( for example) .
I can't imagine how it's gping to be hard
I also noticed that almost all of us tend to learn texts and sentences that are spoken and used in a expositive situation .
And in real life , you aren't gonna hear that
All depends of the context and the place and moment you are
English also use a lot of sarcasm
And how to get through all of that
If you are a b2 already it's gonna be easier than me to reach c1 xd
I have got a plan for that
And is watching tv shows like "Men "
With english subtitles
And pausing the chapter when i don't understand the word
Also i'm thinking about writing down all the words i don't understand in a notebook 📒
But only about the words of the serie
Do not have netfliw
I can say goodbye tot his way
Yes but series there, are all like very inmoral
What did you say?
What do you mean by that
I can say goodbye to the way that you said
I don't have netlix
Netflix*
It's the study of language in-context
False
I've been learning for 6 years and still struggle with some things
I've been lzarning since the last year and i am good with it
Maybe you weren't involved with it
I've never seen someone who took 6 years to learn it
You still make many mistakes, and I'm not saying you're supposed to be mistakeless, but it does take more than one year to have almost no mistakes
When it comes to language, you're always learning
I didn't say i was perfect but i am good
As i said many times everyone makes mistakes
I'm not having a philosophical debate here, I'm saying that one year is not enough
To make a learner have such expectations because of your mistaken belief that you've mastered the language in a year is not fair, it takes much longer than 1 year to reach C1
And i am for the 3rd year learning english pasively
For french/spanish speakers it's easy
C1 is a truly difficult status to reach. To tell them it can be done in one year is inaccurate
I don't know ur native language @boreal ingot but i am kot sharing your opinion
Yeah i agree , i think b2-c1 is hard to master
kot?
Kot ?
You said that
I meant not
Oh, I see
The problem is not the dificulty , the problem is to see the words back again so that your mind could save the meaning as well as we did with the other basic words.
That's the big big big deal
Doesn't matter that you don't share my opinion. Just stop spreading false info about C1 being ssomething you just get in 1 year and done
I agree phrasal verbs are awful, even me i struggle with them everytime
I'm gonna sleep guys good morning i havent slep yet :"v
Actually it's been more than 1 year but i wasn't involved at this time but since last year i've been involved to learn it
My dream is taken around
:"v
Night night
Sweet dreams!
Gn
Nono, I get it. I just like to say 'night' when someone is going to sleep, regardless of the time
lol
That's why i said morning because now is recently rising up
Idk if it's correct but I do it. It isn't a big deal
Got it ha it makes sensr
Even google says that english so easy
Actually it depends on the people
So i am not wrong and you are not wrong
Please note that I'm not sure if natives do this. This could be an idiosyncrasy of mine, or it could be something common; I do not know
So yeah, don't follow it blindly
anyways, sleep well :>
I have been learning for 11 yrs yet I am a beginner 
in case of English, it's easy to form the base but might take you an eternity to get to a fluent/advanced level
Does the following expression make sense?
"The evil-doers' names were written on death's forehead"
You're right but if someone thinks that learning english is hard
I'd tell them
Don't learn chinese
Are you saying that death is coming for the evil-doers?
if so, I would say 'written on death's scythe'
After a bit of googling, it seems 'fate is written on foreheads' in some mythology. So maybe death's fate has smth to do with the evil-doers?
I would be hard pressed to derrive anything from that sentence without surounding context, but I am not the best with these literary things, so wait up on others' opinions
That the evil-doers must be avenged upon
I've not heard 'avenge upon' before
could you explain it in another way?
you have quite a bit to learn about punctuation :0
Learning a language can be really easy for some and really hard for others
I’ve met a few ppl in my life who are just terrific at picking up words in other languages
Their brains are wired for that stuff
Then oppositely I’ve met people who have passed several french or Spanish classes and they barely know a few words…
Who plays Roblox
Grammatically it makes perfect sense but im not sure why death would have names of people he's after written on his forehead. Unless he's looking in the mirror a lot? There is a common expression for something to be 'etched in ones mind' that might get your point across better. Etched is used instead of written, here, because a carving or etching is far more premanent than writing done in any unknown medium. So maybe 'the names of the evil-doers' were etched in deaths mind' or if you are looking to give that imagery of death having names on his forehead you could say 'were both etched in Deaths mind, and written on his forehead'. Also, you do not need 'upon' when using 'avenged'. The evil-doers' deeds must be avenged' 'death must avenge the lives taken by the evil-doers'
Hi guys! Does someone have tips on British pronounciation because i need to pronounce in British for school but I pronounce like Americans so if someone haves a little flyer with some tips like "dont pronounce the R or when its the same letters but not sound PLS help 😢
why not american?
like for me they are the same
I have a video that might be helpful to you but I'm not sure if I'm allowed to share a link, so i could dm it do you if you like. Its from my favorite linguistics YouTuber dr geoff lindsey
its not me its school and i hate British English but it's the official one
yeah why not!
you don't space before question marks 
Oh you mean comma etc ?
Oh, you mean comma, etc.?
you put a space before a question mark ("?") again 
But if i had to talk to a teacher etc i'd put them
no
look at your message again:
Oh you mean comma etc ?
what is the space after "etc" for?
Yeah, they're right. 'etc.' always has a period after because it's an abbreviation and a question mark is used in the same place as a period. You never add a space between a word and the ending mark of a sentence.
Oh yeah i have forgotten that
casually, you can ignore the period after the "etc.", but you should not add a space before a question mark
(this is just for style, but English has settled on that style)
But yeah, in casual conversations like discord or such though its nothing to worry about.
the space before the "?", however...
you won't see it even in colloquial English. avoid them.
Why do you hate it? Is it about the accent?
Ty for correcting me and reminding me that
What is the difference bztween these sentences : What are u doing?
What are u up to?
These two seem identical to me, however the latter is more informal
The words they use, I always have the American ones such as elevator and not lift, the pronounciation of a word that they use is different too even if the sound is written the same. When I check cambridge dictionnary, i always say the American one instead of the British one so i dont get all the points of the test and loose so many points just because i have an American influence...
Does it count for : What are you talking about? What are u on about?
That happened to me too
I had a test
Which we had to use the present perfect
oh the present perfect omg, i always hesitate between present perfect and preterit
forgot or have forgotten hmm idk x)
Even though your educational institution (I don't know whether you're school or uni student) demands british english knowledge, I'd say that american english is much more popular and comes in handy when watching most of movies or youtube videos. Personally, I encounter British content quite rarely, so I strive for gaining American accent
The sentence was : People are celebrating their victory because they have won.
I said they won
My teacher counted me as false
Though i asked the natives
Uni student and they want us to talk British BUT i watch Americans and that's the point, I WANT TO KILL MYSELF EVERY PRONOUNCIATION EXERCICES XD
Yeah in France they like to force us the British English, cool...
yeah, British accent is different and sounds utterly formal to me when watching any british content.
What about in ur country
Im french too haha
oh that’s sad
Oh ok lol
do they stigma american accent
Generally, present perfect is used when we talk about the past that has impact on the present (in this case, they HAVE won, so that's the reason they're celebrating). But most of american speakers and natives don't care about it
Its just UK is near us so all fucking teachers want British and very formal sentences
What about if something that happened yesterday has an impact on the present
Do we use the preterit
Depends on context
Or we still use the present perfect
lol in my school in vietnam they force us to study cambridge english and they hire an indian teacher to teach us lol
yeah
Usually we don't specify when the event took place when dealing with present perfect as the result is the only thing that matters
british accent sucks
TY
I like british people and prefer their english, however sometimes i prefer american english
and I have to learn it to graduate
eww
So when i said i have forgotten was it good or not?
American english sounds very laid-back to me and that's good
hard to hear british when they speak fast
i saw an Adele video, the singer, it was horrible how fast she spoke + had a very very pronounced British accent, it was horrible
yea i watched that interview too
i heard nothing tbh
although i can be considered as a good english listener
Like when i say : Today, we have a party that's why yesterday i have bought new clothes
i think yes cuz its still in the present
Merely buying new clothes has an impact
hmm... On one hand, we see the result, but on the other hand, we specify the time. Honestly, I don't know if we can write "yesterday" here
I hate present perfect
The simpler, the better
oh sad we cant send screens
For real
i had an entire page of exercises
yeah we use screens in French i thought it was the same
I can send
why don’t you use that’s why i bought clothes yesterday
lol
idk if that’s correct
For me merely buying new clothes has an impact to the present
Don't you guys have the "+" button on the left side of the text bar?
no
I did that because i got a party today
oh alr
i can send GIFS but not screenshots x)
what is mz
By the way, do you only use this channel or do you also chat in the other ones on this server&
oh ok
first time that i write in this serv btw
Are you a novice?
On the server or in English ? x)
server
oh, i have been using it since the last spring
and words of the day / expressions
?
on the server
oh, got it
i'm pinged for words and expressions
When do we use had had ?
But, man, if you really look for any good vc's, try those ones on the Anime Soul discord server, that are way more active than on this server. People there talk not only about anime, but about other life topics. So, just in case, you want to improve your speaking skills
.
What do you mean exactly?
yeah no idk im too shy lol
the 2/2 vc looks better its not a lot of people
Me too, huh, in that case, you can stay silent and practice your listening skills
a sentence with two "had" ig
Had he had dinner by nine, he could go out for a breeze before sleeping at 10 PM
where :3
i think he means had next to had so "had had"
okay
He simply wants a sentence using the expression "had had", right?
i think !
He had had his meal before he went out
Vampire are u a real beginner ?
Yes, learning for 11 yrs
U are not
He's not doing beginner's sentences
Ok
Okay, you can see it when dealing with past perfect
Past perfect is easier than the present one
Really?
Yes
of course, it is
It basically says that we use it when talking about an event that precedes the other one
when I was young, I didn't like the past perfect tense and the future perfect tense
wdym where?
me either
hard to use naturally for me
approx. where in Vietnam was the school located
Future perfect tense is easier than the prese.t onz
even though most past perfect sentences use the words "before" and "after"
like while speaking, most pf our sentences become simple past lo
Definitely not
But fortunately in AmE the present perfect and past simple are almost the samz
What is ur native language ?
in the suburb of hanoi
Hindi
ye probably
oki, thx
(i wish i studied there)
I understand why it's hard for you
why don’t you?
money
In french the future perfect is the same
"Bob and John got married fifteen years ago" or "Bob and John have been married for fifteen years" can someone explain me ^^"
it would sound awkward if you were using "had " all the time XD
one emphasizes when the marriage happened and one emphasizes the time between the marriage and now :3
(note: this is most likely incorrect)
its an exercise on present perfect or past perfect, its hard
ye
oh i see
so both are correct im not crazy?
both are correct
The first is the corrzct form
ye but many ppl are in the habit of it
like they just say had all the time lol
The phrase that is in use is "avenge on" actually, but using "avenge upon" might old-fashioned; archaic though, I found it in a dictionary
The phrase is in use is "avenge on" actually, but using "avenge upon" might old-fashioned; archaic though, I found it in a dictionary
whew! discord is drunk today
ah, right, but even they may might mistakes while speaking in a fast pace xD
i agree
maybe because had can be pronounced easier than have?
like this? "James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" xD this is a legitimate sentence btw hahaha
here it is with the proper punctuation "James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher."
lol but what does had had in the second quotation marks mean?
The names of the evil-doers were written on death's forhead, just to imply that the evil-doers must be punished for what they do/have done. My question was regarding whether the sentenced seemed natural or unnatural 💀
its kind of unnecessary but it puts emphasis on the having of the had. its like saying "did in the past have" aka "had had' but either is correct.
i remember there is a sentence “Police police Police police police police Police police.” after seeing this lol
grammatically correct ✅
how many more police's can be added here?
ah yes and the buffalo one, though, that one uses buffalo to mean bullying which is quite an obscure usage. "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."
@cloud badge Anyway, thank you Red sun
i think that’s it
yeah it seemed natural, and also yeah, using 'on' with avenge is not common these days as far as i know but it may be correct. no problem c:
yeah and the will one too “Will, will Will will Will Will's will?”
English sometimes funny tho
Alright, thank you
what does the last 'it' refer to here?
the usage of 'on' after the word avenge
use some relative pronouns man 💀
There is not the slighest doubt about its being incorrect, but as you have mentioned earlier, it's not very common these days
ah ok, interesting, I guess I just never heard it used like that, myself c:
alr, even if you haven't heard of something, it may exist in the works/pieces of literature
yeah, that was my point. I never heard it, so i thought it was interesting that is was correct.
English is very flexible, so finding out all the possibilities is cool to me :p
It's a behemoth 💀
I've sworn to finish reading all the literary collosus in case I don't die in a young age 💀, pray for me :pray:
oh i think ive heard of that, how many pages is it?
what do you think it is?
who is DF Jones?
hes an author who wrote a trilogy called the colossus or something?
what is it to you?
What's different between these sentences?
I will be in trouble if someone tells them my secret
I am gonna be in trouble if someone tells my secret
they both mean that the speaker will be in trouble but the first is more specific about who the secret is being told to. the first implied that the secret could be told to a person or group, while the second could mean anything or anyone, like, posting it on the internet, or shouting it out in public, but could also mean the same as the first one.
I forgot to add the pronoun
oh, so youre asking about the 'I will' vs the 'I am gonna'?
Yeah
they mean the same exact thing in this case
So are they interchangeable?
yes, but the second is more casual and natural, the first is a little more formal or serious, but its such a small difference.
It is just that I meant to exaggerate my statement to imply that I would read as many magna opera of the most famous English authors (authors that created their pieces of literature in English) as possible
Gee, after coming back to senses, I found out that this sentence conveyed the totally opposite implication; I should have used "correct" instead of "incorrect" there lmao
oohhhhhh, ok xD hahaha in that case, i hope you live a looong time xD and yeah, i did notice that about the 'incorrect', but i understood what you were saying there based on the context so no problemo
Is this one correct?
If I had had a sledgehammer, I could have smashed it.
(Conditional past unreal)
Was ChatGPT right? https://chatgpt.com/share/67570289-4480-8004-8718-66d4bf120939
yup, its correct, and the extra had emphasizes the having of the hammer in the past. you could drop it, but then it could be interpreted to mean that you didnt have and still do not have a sledgehammer. had had just tells you that you didnt have one at that time, but, you might own one, it just wasnt with you.
hello, i have a question
how do i say this number?
672,782
six hundred thousand seventy two and seven hundred eighty two?
am i wrong?
six hundred and seventy two thousand, seven hundred and eighty two
and goes after the hundred?
i thougt it was after the thousand
what do you mean?
like this:
that's only if its zeros
so 600
six hundred thousand, seven hundred and eight two
take it step by step
six hundred seventy two thousand and seven hundred and eighty two
this is wrong then
thank uuuuuuuu
so look at it this way
if you have 10
you say ten
acc thats a bad example
if you have 100
you say one hundred
because you are coming to the final zero
if its 120, its one hundred AND Twenty
but then if you go 123, its one hundred and twenty THREE
see how you are finishing with the final one
here on the 672
you finish with the 2
so it would be two thousand
as that corresponds to the thousands column seen here
hope this helps
okay so, the "and" it's just for numbers which final in 0
sorry
every numbers instead of 0
right?
Theophrastus’s review of the doctrines of earlier philosophers, On the Senses, no copies of which survive, is a lost work.
Is the relative clause modifying review or On the Senses?
Yet, they themselves survive without apology, with, instead, their simple claims and complex colors.
Is this a case of asyndetic coordination?
I don't think so, im not sure of your question
For British English, numbers greater than 100 and less than 1000 always include and between the “hundreds” figure and the other part:
Three hundred and forty-two
Four hundred
Numbers greater than 1000 include and between any “hundreds” figure and the figure less than 100, and then state the multiple:
Five thousand, three hundred
Three hundred and forty-two thousand, two hundred and fifty-one
One million, three hundred thousand, four hundred and twenty
Two thousand, three hundred and sixty-two million
That is, any of the three-figure groups in a large number follow the first rule before stating the multiplier.
She has beautiful eyes.
She has a beautiful eye.
She has the beautiful eyes.
Which one is correct and commonly used?
Poor beginners
you'll get to A2 eventually 
/s
First one only
A beautiful eye implies only one of them is beautiful or they only have one eye
The beautiful eyes make her eyes sound like a detachable product, are they prosthetics?
'Me' is the oblique first-person singular pronoun. It's used when referring to the speaker as the recipient of or one who is subjected to an action, most typically; it can also act as a prepositional complement. In a word, it generally takes an object role in the sentence and refers to the speaker. It contrasts with the nominative first-person singular pronoun, which typically acts as the subject, meaning it's used as the doer of an action. These pronouns' referent is entirely reliant on context, so they're deictic pronouns
What's avenging on? I've never heard 'on/upon' following 'avenge'
I'd say 672,782 probably
wdym
The first is the most commonly used.
The second means either 1. One of her eyes is beautiful, the other is not, or 2. She owns an eye that is beautiful (she took someone's eye).
The third would be said if 'beautiful eyes' is an established item or quality. Say we live in a world where once every 100 years someone is born with 'the beautiful eyes', if you saw them, you could say they have the beautiful eyes. It's like the title of an item that's one of a kind
Dumb joke, lol
I just wrote the numbers instead of actually writing out how I'd say it
As I said, dumb joke
Or with a picture of someone's eyes one might ask "Who is the one that has these beautiful eyes?" And then another might respond "She has the beautiful eyes" while pointing to the person
hahaha
Guys what is the most effective way to memorize tenses 😭💔
Which relative clause? I don't see one ngl