#đď˝english-questions
1 messages ¡ Page 79 of 1
Hello
fundamentalism itself is following scripture or directions exactly as written,
for example a fundamentalist islam would not break a SINGLE line in the quaran, and takes it all literally
ive never heard fundamentalist being used for âdumbing downâ a complex matter though, I donât think itâd be literally wrong (if that makes sense?)
Which sentence should I use when I want to talk about my ability?
I am able to see
I can see
while using fundamentalist to describe paraphrasing isnât wrong because fundamental basically means the core or base of things I donât think Iâve ever used it before
both are fine
exactly the same thing pretty much
fundamentalist is like radicalist kinda
itâs more of an adjective
not really I donât think, itâs just added to describe something
sorry?
just to keep going, extremist comes from the word extreme, and is usually used to define those who take âEXTREMEâ stances on political or religious matters
fundamentalist is the same but itâs meant for those who take matters LITERALLY from the fundamentals of it rather than make interpretations or judgments
same for words like centrist, leftist, rightist, you get the idea
please note itâs 6am and I cannot sleep so if I sound like an idiot I apologise
are they both correct?
1 - I go to work by bus
2- I go to work by a bus
I think both sentences are correct, but the first one is more common. 'I go to work by bus' is how most people would say it. It's like saying 'I go to work on foot' or 'I go to work by car', you know? The 'by' just indicates that the bus is the way I'm getting to work.
The second one, 'I go to work by a bus', is also okay, but it sounds a bit more formal or old-fashioned. It's like saying 'I go to work on the red bus' or something. So, if you're talking to someone in everyday conversation, it's probably better to stick with the first sentence!
ty
how much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?
i think both r fine but i think the first one is better
thats not an english question đ¤
It's a question in english is it not?
Therefore it's an english question
not a question about english.
At least 2.
Please prove that eineiwnsuqakkans divided by 2 and squared is a rational number, knowing that iwbewisnaoeheodbwwnwnw to the power of 69 yields 3
Eleven.
The proof is insufficient, please perform a triple backflip with your bĹtt naked
didn't censore the viet u sound, FBI you lazy fmĹckĂŞrs
Any rational number divided by any other rational number yields a rational number. Any rational number multiplied by a rational number yields a rational number.
If eineiwnsuqakkans is a rational number, being divided by 2 and squared, it will remain a rational number. If it is an irrational number, these operations can make it rational (like a half of square root of two squared yields 0.25), but not necessarily.
Information that iwbewisnaoeheodbwwnwnw to the power of 69 yields 3 is irrelevant, as iwbewisnaoeheodbwwnwnw is not related to eineiwnsuqakkans and cannot indicate rationality or irrationality of the latter.
congrats you didn't get the joke, pasted it into chatgpt and you're feelin smart
Congrats, you did not understand that I did not use ChatGPT, and that I was joking. This is my sense of humor, which is beyond your understanding, obviously.
OK, young boy. I will. I am 63 now, I still may grow up a little.
#đď˝english-questions becomes silly.
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood it could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood
bro is out of our realm
so frickin real bro đ
Hello! I am confused, is it wrong to say " I went on a stroll''? Do I need to use preposition 'for'?
No, this is correct. It's a common idiom used to say "I went out to (action phrase)."
Although, you can use for to say "I went/I'm going out for a stroll" to convey you're actively going to walk for exercise or relaxation.
it's fine
i'd personally use "and I come from California" but otherwise it's fine i think
how to read a math paper,there are lots of word can't understand .how to remember these ... concept and link these one by one.I apologize if I disturbed the chats,because i just want to get the answer about this questionđ
For maths that worked for me is practice the past papers of whatever paper you doing and just get better at pattern recognition as most of the time you need to do the same thing for similar questions
repeat shi endlessly and it sticks
In English, has English native speaker used should for Obligation?
Thank you, now it's clear! I struggled with this phase so much for no reason, even changing it to "skroll" 
yes
What is difference between should be supposed and have to
should be and supposed to are pretty much the same
have to basically means âneeds to beâ
âi should go runâ
âi am supposed to go runâ
these are the same
âi have to go runâ
not the same, basically saying I need to run
Bruv... đŹ
Is it correct to say...
So, that's it. I'm going now, see you tomorrow.
sounds like there be some rules.well,i will try to find them ,at least to extract the common part in these papers that have same subject,thxđ
hello everyone
Good afternoon, could anyone help correct this passage:
"The AC sucks the heat from indoor and emits it to the outside, so when people passes by where the outer box of AC hangs, they can feel the heat being emitted."
Please help make it natural (not restricted to the structure above), thanks
âi should go runâ
âi am supposed to go runâ
these are the same
I have to disagree with this. At least in General American, I'd say "I should go run" means roughly "I think it would be best if I go run", whereas "I'm supposed to go run" means I'm being externally pressured by someone or something to run, like a coach or personal trainer.
What does the construction "somebody is to do something" mean? For exampl, "He was to make a choice". Also what "somebody happens to do something" mean? For example, "He happend to win the competition". And does "emerge" mean only "appear from something or out of something"? Because i often hear it being used as just "to appear". For example, "after 5 minutes he emerged".
I will appreciate your help
- "To be to do something" means "to be supposed to do something". It's used as a command, like a parent saying "You are to clean your room before you go outside," and for planned events, like "He was to arrive by 6:00, but he got stuck in traffic."
- "To happen" in this sense means that something is unintended or coincidental; it happens by chance. "He happened to win the competition" means he won unintentionally or unexpectedly.
- Indeed, "to emerge" means "to appear out of something," but if where the person/thing emerged from can be inferred from context, it doesn't have to be stated. "After 5 minutes, he emerged" means that he came out of wherever he had been, maybe a different room.
Thanks for such a detailed response. So can i say "the employee was to clean the table" because it means "the employee was supposed to clean the table"?
In the cooling process, the AC draws warm air from the interior and emits it outside. When people pass by the AC exhaust they will feel the heat being emitted.
Yep, exactly!
Is couldnt have v3 like, we want to do something but we cant do that?
Thank youđ
Btw, is 'exhaust' there a noun?
Hello, which one is correct: "She needs money bad" or "she needs money badly". I just can't understand how to use "bad/badly" in context of "strongly, much, very"
She needs money badly, I think this one is much better
Okay, and can one say "i was badly exhausted"? I mean, i want to know whether badly and "very", "very much" are interchangeable.
"We couldn't have done something" describes a hypothetical past scenario where it wasn't possible for us to have done something. It doesn't necessarily mean anything about wanting or not wanting to do it
For example,"Did you steal the money?" - "No, we couldn't have stolen it because we were at work." The hypothetical scenario is us stealing the money, which would have been impossible because we were busy at work.
Compare that to "We couldn't steal the money," which implies that we actually tried to steal it but weren't able to.
Yes
bad = adjective (describes a noun)
badly = adverb (describes a verb, adjective, or anything else)
In this case, you're describing the manner in which she needs the money. "To need" is a verb, so you would use an adverb.
Adjectives are sometimes used instead of adverbs of manner in casual language, though, so you may also hear "She needs money bad", but this is technically seen as improper.
I guess you could, but it sounds a little odd to me. I would say "badly" is more like "desperately" than "very".
You could say "She desperately needs money" (= she's desperate for money), but "I'm desperately exhausted" doesn't really work.
somehow I didn't see anyone responding to this one xd
yes, that is correct. sort of like "that is everything (for the moment)".
So "badly" in this context means "to so intense/extreme degree that makes one desperate"?
Something like this?
In me personal opinion you could use badly as there isnât much really wrong in my eyes, but Iâd rather use extremely exhausted instead.
More or less, yes, although it's not always interchangeable with "desperately"
Generally it means either "desperately" (eg. "to need or want something badly") or "severely" (eg. "to be badly hurt or damaged")
In the meaning of "severely", it could make sense with "exhausted". It's just doesn't feel like the word I'd choose in that case. I'd rather say "very/really/extremely exhausted"
Okay, so badly and very are not interchangeably. For example, "she loves him much" and "she loves him badly" are not the same. Moreover, the latter doesn't make sense to me
Okay, thanks
hello guys
is it correct: ?
⢠Have you made any mistakes when you did this work yesterday?
did you make any mistakes when you were doing this work yesterday
did you make any mistakes - past simple cuz of the keyword "yesterday", so a specific point in the past
when you were doing this - past continuous, because I want to express that they were doing the activity for some time and ask if they made any mistakes during that time
why my sentence is incorrect?
Thanks again
Same as your previous question. Present perfect tense is not used together with a specific past time reference.
"Did you make any mistakes when you did this work yesterday" would be fine, but you can't use present perfect if you also mention an exact timeframe separate from the present.
In some sentences, "badly" and "very" can be interchangeable. For example, "badly hurt" and "very hurt" are both possible, though I think "badly" sounds better. It's just more accurate to say "badly" is synonymous with "desperately" or "severely" than "very".
"She loves him badly" could work if it's meant to express some kind of desperation in her love, but yeah, it doesn't mean exactly the same thing as "She loves him very much."
(It could also be used with the other meaning of "badly", as in "not done well". "She loves him badly" = "She is not good at loving him.")
that's , without 'yesterdauy' ?
- "Have you made any mistakes when you did this work?"
but what about 'you did'
after all, the use of "you did" indicates a specific time in the past , becaus this is a past simple.
it is incorrect ?
Hey, can I use like this?
It could has been him
I would change both parts of the sentence to present perfect: "Have you made any mistakes when you've done this work."
You will sometimes hear people use present perfect and past simple together, but present perfect + present perfect generally sounds more proper
Can i ask for a question?
Dig up and dig out are the same aren't they?
hmm yes i've seen that. But how it can be used together?
It should be "It could have been him," but yes, that would be correct if you're speaking about an imaginary/hypothetical situation.
A sentence/clause can only have one conjugated verb. Any other verbs should be infinitives or participles. In this case the conjugated verb is "could", so "have" has to be in infinitive form (the base form of the verb).
Thank you. I can see the difference now
yeah I agree
?
I left the question i wanted to ask
oh mb
I don't know if there are any situations where they should be used together. It's just something people do sometimes. I feel like it sounds more acceptable in some sentences than others, but I wouldn't be able to tell you why.
Like "Have you made any mistakes when you did the work" definitely sounds wrong to me, while "Have you made any mistakes when you used the software" sounds alright, just a little less natural. But I don't know what the reason for that is, if there even is a reason.
For someone learning the language, I would probably recommend just not using them together.
pretty much but itâs more natural to say dig up
âiâll go dig it upâ
âIâll go dig it outâ
I canât think of a difference between the two of im being honest
i think most people would use dig up as I said though
I've seen this many times
ok , thank you
So dig up literally is about digging something from the soil and if you are using it in the context âdig out â is basically the same. However there are some other applications for âdig outâ.
For example âdig outâ means also to hollow something out as in to make a cave or even to hollow out a log to make a boat. Dig out can also mean to find somethingâŚI have a book around here that I thought you might like let me dig it out for you.
Now im getting now ty
Hmmm come to think of it âdig up â can also be an idiomatic phrase meaning to get more information about somethingâŚ.they hired a private detective to dig up more information about their spouseâs affair before they hired the divorce attorney
What is difference between
You should get arrested as well
You should be getting arrested as well.
"You should get arrested as well" is a recommendation or prediction, "You should be getting arrested as well" implies that the process of arrest should already be happening now
It would be awkward if I recommended someone should be arrested but thanks.
I need someone to write me cool joke stories 1-2 for job interview, dosent matter topic
Just use ChatGPT
what are these jokes đ
What are you applying for?
It sounds awkward as hell.
What is the different between connection and connection (stressing on the nn in the second word ) ?
It doesn't matter
Just opened topic
Only not 18+ jokes or something
đđđđ
If you're asking if there's a difference in meaning, then there isn't one. It's more of a dialect/vernacular preference.
Better than nothing
Hi everyone
i consider myself an intermediate speaker
B2
any advice
and some resouces to reach fluency
read more listen more use SRS, end
Okay, thanks.
You seem unloved and everyone here can see whyâyou have a personality that even a frog would avoid, and they leap at tires. Is 'leap at tires' idom/phrase?
"if i were to do" or "if i did"? when do i use each form?
What are you all doing
"if I were to do" is more used professionally or as to present something hypothetical. Depending on the context it can also be used at present tense.
"if I did" is more casual and could be used to present something that is more possible for you to do or as more non-hypothetical. This can also be used as something you did in the past.
Both of them can be used in different ways for different context
Were I to do
If I were to do
If I did
They are equivalent
The last is the most common, the first is the least common, but it depends on the person
Similar forms exist for the 3rd conditional too:
Had I done
Were I to have done
If I were to have done
If I had done
Again, same meaning
what is the difference between cant have and couldnt have
**"Can't have" **means something is impossible now or recently, while **"couldn't have" **means it was impossible in the past
they're the same unless you're talking about physically holding on to something
even then they're not much different but yeah
Hang on-can mean to wait (informal usage). âHang on, I need to run in the store and get something really quicklyâ Hang on also means to hold onto something. âPlease hang on to those papers, you will need them laterâ
Hold onâcan mean to âhang onâ to something. But can also be used to ask someone to wait either in person Or on the phone. Hold on is used when there is a chance what you are holding can get away from you. âHold on tightly to your hat it is very windy todayâ.
Both Hold on and hang on are used interchangeably
Hold upâcan also mean to wait (this is a slang usage). âHold up I gotta talk to my friend.â Hold up can also mean to literally put something up in the air âHold up the banner so everyone can see it.â Hold up can also mean a robbery usually involving a weapon âThere was a hold-up at the bank and the robber walked out with a bag of cash.â
There are also some differences in grammar, here is the list I could find
Quite a bit. There's the difference in dialect where Americans prefer to stress the r in speech and Britain stress the t. There's also the difference in denotation of some items and (maybe, not entirely sure on this) events.
E.g. A sweet crispy, breaded treat is called a cookie in US and is called a biscuit in Britain(US does a have different term for buscuit as well). There's alot more differences between them, so I'd recommend researching and learning what preferences there are in US and Britain if you're wanting to completely submerge in the English diversity. (This also doesn't include the difference in Australian English)
oh
thank u sir
Can u teach British English i really wanna learn it??!!
What does " how should I know that " mean?
You should learn all tenses if you want to learn British English.
it means exactly what it looks like "how would i know that"
Anyway, do you know when should I use past perfect and past perfect continuous in which context?
beuh the only language i speak is english and what the heck is a past perfect continuous
i dont think i can help there, sorry lol
We use Past Perfect to talk about completed action before another past action. Most of the time we use it with past simple to show the difference. For instance : "Paul had gone home when I arrived at the party". It means that firstly Paul went home and later you arrived to that place. So you didn't see him. In Past Perfect Continuous we focus on the duration than on the result ( Past Perfect) .The action took some time , continued up before another one in the past, so we want to emphasis it. Example : " My hands were dirty because I had been repairing my bike"
It means that the action of repairing the bike occurred before having dirty hands. Hope it helps!)
Hello againđť
I wanna ask about inversion after negative words. Is it grammatically correct if we do it in a nominal sentence?
I usually did it only for verbal sentence by adding an auxiliary verb.
Nominal
(Original)
The government is barely giving attention to poor people.
(Inverted)
Barely is the government giving attention to poor people.
Thanks!
The government is barely giving attention to poor people.
Barely is the government giving attention to poor people.
I don't see the difference. did you make a typo?
as I understood, questions and inversion work the same, but instead of what/why/etc.... you put a negative adverb first, so your example should work
im in the b3 vc and im practising for my b2 test if anyone is interested w speaking w me
"Lad" means a guy, used mainly in Ireland and Scotland. "Sound" means good or cool. For example, a "sound lad" is a cool guy. People often say "fair enough," but I'm not sure if it's common in the U.S. "Grand" means good or great, but it's different from "sound"
You can use "Grand" almost everywhere. For example, you can say "I should be grand" when talking about doing well on an upcoming exam. But you can't say "I should be sound" because it would imply "I should be cool", which sounds like you're boasting about yourself
Say "Fair play to ya" if you want to say "Well done"
Hmmm
What is the difference between lad bloke and chap?
same thing
british words for young man
anyone can please send me their quizlet playlists (b2-c1 level)
(I assume you meant "The government is barely giving attention to poor people" for the original sentence?)
The inverted sentence is possible grammatically, but it would be strange to hear outside of a literary/poetic context.
Yo
I heard that cant have sounds more British, is that true?
Yes, that's true. Sorry for typođ .
Thanks for the clarificationđť !
Now I understand better about the inverted version because of negative words â also applicable to nominal sentence
Yes! Many thanks!
what is the difference between humen and humans
sorry?
human is how it's spelt
humans is multiple
human is one
But the correct plural form of human is humen
Ohh sorry
"Humen" isn't a word.
-man > -men plurals only occur with words where -man is a suffix meaning "a man who is/does [something]", eg. businessman > businessmen, policeman > policemen. "Human" isn't one of these; the plural of "human" is regular.
Ok@round jungle
But police is uncountable but it takes plural verb right?
Like police are
We can say policeman is
5 policemen are
Artillery,infantry,police which take plural verb?
The american accent and the british accent differ in word's stree or spelling
Or letters
You should watch more documentaries,movies,series..anything that would give a clear idea on how it works and i suggest using english subtitles
Oh watch bridgeton
Yes, "police" is a collective noun that is always plural, usually as "the police"
But you can also say "police officers" or "policemen/women_*_" to refer to a group of police officers.
eg. The police are here or (The) police officers are here.
*Note that the suffixes -man and -woman for professions are generally considered old-fashioned nowadays. It's advised to use a gender-neutral term instead, like "police officer" or "businessperson"
If somebody said polices I would think they meant policies lol
they don't sound alike, but some people make some words the same way so...
Nice explanation
If I say " I have been reading your book " means it began at a point in the past and is still continuing
And " I had been reading your book " means it began at a point in the past and was end at a point in the past. Right?
Yes.
Thanks!
I confirm!
With my whole spinal cord, my thymus, my hypothalamus, and basal ganglia too
And my glutes
What is the difference between
I slept all day
I was sleeping all day.
Does the second sound more emphasis
Thnq it would really help...!đ
Not only as "finally"
The difference is in tense.
"I slept all day" means that from one point in the past (start) to another point in the past (end), you had been sleeping for that allotment of time.
"I was sleeping all day" means that at one point in the past (start) you began sleeping up to the current (present) time of being asked.
In some cases, ultimately may be interchangeable with in conclusion/after all. Since in conclusion/after all is used to come to a logical consensus of previous information, using ultimately can have the same effect. Conversely, ultimately has a more personal touch that doesn't always consider the information relayed beforehand; its use is mainly to side with one or the other on a personal level rather than logical reasoning.
Okay, thanks. And it also can mean "finally", right?
By the way, can i ask you non-english question?
Depends on the question, I suppose.
I wouldn't say they have the same meaning.
Finally means something or some action is the last out of a list or a repetition.
Ultimately means something is of the highest order or preference, hence having a personal touch as previously stated.
Sorry, i dont understand what you meant by "something of the highest priority"
Can you give me couple of examples where i can/can't use ultimately/finally, if possible?
Sure. Let's say that it's time to start cleaning the household for a family get together and you make a list of chores.
The final chore would be last on the list.
The most prioritized chore can take place anywhere on the list: the start, somewhere in the middle, or even the final chore.
The ultimate chore could be one that you find most amusing or most challenging.
Sorry, you're right saying that ultimate couldn't mean priority; I'll change it.
Thanks for response
Do you have Ayanokoji on your pfp?
I do have Kiyotaka as my pfp.
Do you read ln or just watch anime?
Both. I've watched up to season 3 and I'm currently on manga 4. I'll prob start the novels after I've done the manga.
Personally, i have never considered reading manga as i don't like its drawing. I am on ln year 2 vol3. It is the second island exam
Are you British ,mate?
Unfortunately, I'm American.
Why unfortunately. You sound like a great imperial unit
1 foxyboxtrot = 2.827 meters
1 ultrasupergoatfoxyboxtrot = 2.99 meters
"another server" is a wild request.
You can google English discord servers and find some probably
Please excuse the question, but there are over 200,000 members on this server, do you suppose you might find a friend or two here?
bro what is this pfp lmaoo
It is the otterborealis
Which salon should you go to as a beginner?
You mean for Voice chat or for texting chat?
Voice chat, for beginners like me, I don't have a B1 level yet
There are no real rules about where you should go. There are A1, A2 and A3 Beginner. But anyone can go to any voice channel. If you donât feel confident to speak you can just listen in, until you feel more comfortable.
OK, thank you, I'll do that, for the moment I don't feel ready to talk yet knowing that I don't have an accent, I can even say a complete sentence, it depends I can say 2 or 3 sentences that's all, do you have any advisors who could help me improve quickly?
Each room is connected to each level I imagine for example channel A0 is for beginners and channel A2 for people who have a good level?
Yes but people move around a lot to find topics and people they are comfortable talking with. I would offer to come speak with you. But I canât at this moment. Many people have accents, please donât worry you will improve your skill. I also recommend checking the events calendar and finding some classes you might like to attend. đ
Ok thank you for reassuring me, what are the events are vision classes with a teacher for example? I'm interested in how it's going please, for the moment as I have 0 level of English I don't have the courage to join salons and talk
When you click that calendar, it will show you all the events that are regularly offered. So teachers like me will have a planned program that they share. There are opportunities to listen and often there is time to practice. There are many useful topics for all skill levels.
OKok, it's perfect, it's great, thank you very much, you told me that there are events for all kinds of levels, right? The next event starts on July 22nd, right?
Yes, that seems accurate
Okay, thank you, I can't wait for it to start. Would you be there during the session?
My next session is not until Sunday.
Oh yes, I forgot that there were gaps between you and us, I'll be there, even if it's Sunday, I have a goal to have a good level of English before the resumption of classes for us
( European it's in September )
slkdfjlasjdfksakfheasfs
adf
s
d
fs
fd
s
d
fs
f
sf
af
f
f
f
ff
ff
f
F
real
Hii
hello
yeah
Hello! Is there any idiom (or phrase) about changing things easily, without thinking and hesitating? I heard one but forgot
Hey guys, the word "can't" is pronounced as /kÉn/ or /kÉËn/?
Or are there any correct way to pronunce "can't"
In the blink of an eye
although thats kinda focused on it changing quickly
I think grammar is a deep hole, I can't to see what is it in clearly 
Standard Southern British: /kÉËnt/
General American: /kĂŚnt/
Important:
- "Can't" is almost always stressed, and the vowel is NOT reduced to /É/ or /ÉŞ/ even when unstressed
- "Can", on the other hand, is pronounced /kĂŚn/ only when it is being emphasized (in both SSB and GA). Most of the time it is unstressed and pronounced /kÉn/, /kÉŞn/, /knĚŠ/, or even just /nĚŠ/
- Don't rely on the T at the end of "can't" to tell these words apart, as it's often barely pronounced or even dropped entirely. Instead, pay attention to the vowel and where the stress is in the sentence.
"It would seem plausible to assume that [X]" means that it seems plausible that someone would assume [X], not that [X] is plausible.
"It would seem plausible that [X]" means that [X] seems plausible.
It's possible the first sentence would be understood as "[X] is plausible", but if that's what you mean, then the second one is better.
polish A2 when

when I say so 
With a snap of the fingers or you can even shorten that to âin a snapâ
Or âit turned on a dimeâ
What does conference means
Thanks iotter and black cat!
Oh yes that's what I meant
No.
I mean, I would use that contraction when I should for expectation and assumption.
đ¤
No, because I'd means "I had (followed by past perfect)" or "I would"
I had fed my cat before I went to work. I'd fed my cat before I went to work.
I would tell her that I love black haired women, but I am scared. I'd tell her that I love black haired women, but am scared.
There are no contractions of "should" in standard English
(besides should not > shouldn't)
Different dialects can have their own non-standard contractions, but if there are any that contract "should" as "'d", it would be limited to only those dialects
could you tell him that before he made the mistake?
or
could you have told him that before he made the mistake?
which one is correct?
1st one is correct
The second one is correct. The first one should say âcould you tell him that before he makes the mistake?â
Hi all, could anyone help understand what a giggle laugh is like?
like "heehee." You can just search for it on Youtube or something
Thank you, btw, how come most sentences i read seem use it on girls?
usually not much of a difference, but sometimes:
- "could" implies you weren't able to, as in it was impossible for you to do it for some reason
- "would" implies you were able to do it, but you just didn't want to
OR - "could" is less sure than "would." Like, for example, the example right below the highlighted part can work with either; but if you use "would," you'd sound like you were 100% sure you would get the degree; while with "could" it's more like you would have the chance/opportunity to get it if you tried (but the important thing is that it was possible)
"giggle" is considered cute and innocent(?), so no wonder it's mostly used with girls. You can use it for kids in general too, but it'd be a little weird to use it for a guy unless there's a specific context
and unless you're Michael Jackson
Thanks, so when a guy passing by a group of girls in school, when they gossip and laugh about him, that's giggle too, right?
yes.
Thanks, there are so many type of laugh in English, it's confusing sometimes
Omg you giggle in such a cute way
đ
Aren't you polish
polish? why? no
Ah. Sorry then
The monument on your profile picture reminded me of somebody and I felt like you could be
It's ok, Thanks for the effort to explain though

What do you mean?
you'll probably have a better time answering other questions. đ¤
No!
Heresy
đ
What is the difference between
Let
Let's ?
Still wanna know??
Let's = Let us
It's usually used to suggest we do something, like "Let's go outside."
"Let" by itself means "to allow," "to not prevent": I let the dog (go) outside. = I allowed the dog to go outside.
Good morning everyone, could any native tell me what do you usually call the box of AC that hung outside the wall?
Is there an open-source English sentence database similar to Tatoeba?
Guys can you help me
I always use went like " you went home?"
Or "you go home?"
As a past tense
Can someone bring me examples
Generallly you don't use "went"but "go"
Maybe also depend on the context
Like, not "You went home?"
But, "Did you go home?"
I'm not sure exactly what your question is, but "went" is the past conjugation of "to go". You use it anytime you want to use "go" in simple past tense:
- You went home yesterday.
- I went to the store on Sunday.
- They went to England last summer.
"You go home" is simple present tense. You would use it if you were talking about an action that is habitual / regularly repeated in the present: "Everyday after work you go home and cook dinner."
Have any idea on organizing your English notebook?
I'd like to see the photo of how you organizing and taking your notes
Hello! I think I can share with you, let's go to dm?
this is not really correct grammatically, but yeah, some people speak like this. You should say "Did you go home?" instead. But some people seem to use the one you gave too even tho it's not entirely correct
Notebooks are inefficient. I use an algorithm, which distributes my notes to me over a certain period of time automatically, so that I can have time for reviewing everything and not spend too much time on this everyday. "Anki" is the software name. SRS, spaced repetition system, is the algorithm it uses and the one I mentioned
the only people who use them (notebooks) are the ones who did not find a better alternative, and resorted to notebooks cuz that's how schools operate
Yes and no. It's grammatically correct, but requires some nuance. Any sentence can be asked as a question without changing the word order, but the implication then is that you think the statement is true and you're just confirming.
Or you know it's true and you're communicating something else by presenting it as a question, like disapproval, judgement, or disbelief. "You went home? Seriously? Why didn't you stay and finish your work like you were supposed to?"
"You went home?" = I think you went home, but I want to make sure, or I'm implying some added meaning with my tone.
"Did you go home?" = A neutral question that I don't know the answer to. I'm just asking if you went home.
@charred hedge
yeah, I assumed they wanted to use it always in every context instead of did you go home. Cuz that's how some people do
Like some don't even know that there is a question form like "did you...", they always go for the first one you listed
Yeah, true
giggity giggity giggity
hi yall
hi
weird name lol
ik
Hi đ guys, my name is Westy. Recently, I noticed that I can't speak that good. Even though I was understanding , I just wanted to ask, "How to speak fluently as Americans?"
Is there a pronunciation tricks to sound the words as Americans
for example, was (/wez/)
Like the fear of making mistakes when speaking in conversation. Smh like that towards me to give up..
Hello, guys
I have several questions all at once
What is the difference between "to accuse of", "to blame for", "to charge with"? What is the difference between "wet" and "moist"? And is "to shove" is just "to push hard"?
Thanks in advance
Am gonna respond only to the ones that am fully sure about, so, not to the last one lol.
You can blame me for something. For example, for being unorganized and messy, it is something to blame me for. This is kind of an everyday phrase for many things done wrong.
But, if you blame for something, then you accuse me of doing it. If you blame me for eating your cake, then you accuse me of eating your cake. You form an accusation, so the thought that I did something wrong and it should be said aloud.
Charging somebody with something is usually used in contexts of courts, prisons, police, law enforcement, all this. If somebody is charged with something, they committed a crime and now somebody accuses them of committing a crime. They can plead guilty - so say that they did this and they're guilty.
Wet is when it's very wet, a lot of water sank into it. Moist is when it is not fully wet, there is some water that sank inside, but it's not fully wet yet
So accuse = blame?
no
not entirely
you blame me for eating your cake = you say that I ate it and it's bad. It focuses on you being mad about this, the emotion
you accuse me of eating your cake = you think that I ate it and you are currently saying that I should be blamed for this, somebody should be mad about this. It is most likely that I did this and you just point it out
Blaming somebody means that you think they're guilty and you feel they should take the blame, should feel responsible. Accusing them simply means saying that they did something wrong
Okay blaming is more about emotion and accuse is more about stating fact
Or not fact, depends on whether the one who accuses lies or not
But i got it
It is more about pointing out
Thank you
yeah the difference is kinda in the emotions and what the speaker focuses on. Accuse sounds more formal too
So in law context both charge with and accuse of are good, or charge with is more preferable?
charging somebody with something is very official and it means you most likely have some proof on this
you can accuse anybody of anything tbh. But if someone is charged with something then this sounds very serious already
By the way, not gonna correct you, but i want to clarify something. Wouldn't it be better if you used "water soaked into it" rather than "water sank into it". I have recently learned both words, and isn't "sinking" is more about submerging something under water and "soaking" is about getting absorbed into?
yes, you are right. The way I wrote this feels a bit unusual, casual
to describe it accurately, I should have written it like you mentioned
Okay, thanks. I have also heard about "getting convicted of" which means getting finally judged/getting finally sentenced, whereas "getting charged with" is just getting accused of
Tbh it depends on how we think about this right. I wrote that the water sank into the fabric. So, the fabric must have some microscopic spaces in itself that the water sank into. This way it makes sense. But usually I should just say it soaked into the fabric
Does "casual" mean "daily" in this context?
Nah. More like something I did not pay attention to
I have bad understanding of this word
I see it all the time
Kinda like casual outfit
Not making enough effort to choose some stylish outfit or clothes
This meaning i know
Casual outfit
But, i have also heard "casually" can be used as "done by accident" or "done nonchalantly, not giving enough care"
Is it true?
Yeah
So if i wish someone something, but i do it "casually", does it mean that i am not sincere enough or something like this?
not really. You are just not very invested into it, you're not really very emotionally engaged in it. You haven't thought about it a lot, or you say it with no effort
Oh, so it is kind of easy-going way of doing something, right?
If you were then you'd focus on them, like look in the eyes and say it with a serious voice. Then it would not sound casual
Thank you, black cat
By the way, could you say whether i am correct or not, if i say that "have to" is more about external obligations, whereas "must" is more about inner motivation which obligates one to do something? I mean, is it natural to say that "he must do sports to lose some weight"? Is it right to use "must" instead of "have to" here, because this obligation was made by himself, it is his inner goal to lose weight. So, will i be right, if i say "he has to go to work", because this is an external obligation which makes him go to work. The point is, i often see the two words being used almost interchangeably and i get completely lost when i read about "imposition" and "formality" related to using "must"
So it makes difficult to understand the difference
Guys i need complete texts prepared for job interview
Introduction yourself e.t.c
Can someone send me
You're right
That's pretty much as far as you can get by trying to understand it with logic. Later you just feel what something means and when it is used, after X thousand hours of hearing english
Hello
Whats the difference between
He is nice
He is being nice?
Like
Being + Adjective
Hello
Being nice,currently happening,he might change later or that is something surprising
He is nice,describing him completely as always nice
Send the hw
So this is the Idioms and I need to see which one is correct
Ig on the dole
Bedridden
Keyed up. ,tongue tied
9 off colour
10- broken hearted
Now I got it, thanks for your help
Who ?
Wait
your answers seem correct
Oh..that one tongue tied he already used it
Oh okayy
Help Bangladeshi Students â¤ď¸
Bangladesh's internal situation is very agitated.. Bangladesh Govt. and Student league with police source are being prepared to attack the general students of Bangladesh, Who are now in the street demanding for the reformation of discriminating Quota system in job and every govt. sector of Bangladesh..We need the international media focus.. Help us..Please give focus on our general students...So that if we are being blooded, The world can know this..
Please help Bangladesh Genarel students
We need help international Media
#QuotaReformProtest
#savebangladeshistudent
#ঢাবি #quata #ŕŚŕŚžŕŚŹŕŚż
Please save our university Brothers đ
I don't think you can say "he must do sports to lose some weight."
You'd better say "he shoud sports to lose some weight."
mate
sports isnât a verb
âhe should sportsâ
dawg
That sounds better
âhe should play sportsâ
itâs right I think but it doesnât sound like it
Anyhow, thx for your advice
np
Btw, where are you from?
Hi peopel
people*
which are some ways to say hello?
When should I use "siblings" instead of "brothers" or "sisters"?
@nocturne lynx
Hello so siblings is more general when you don't specify how many brothers or sisters you have.
By the way if you you have a one sister or one brother then you use "sibling", but if you have more than one then use plural form "siblings"
if you have zero, @silk tundra, would it be "sibling" or "siblings"? :]
it would be blinks blinks, cuz even if you blink, or you blink twice, they do not appear. They do not exist. You are alone in this cruel world
you can just say "have one sister" or "have one brother". No need for adding a/an if you gave a number before the word already. You don't say "I have a two cats" or "He has a one parrot", just omit the a/an/the in such places
Hello, can someone help me pass my English tests, they are very simple (Friday 9:00 +3GTM)
@dense oasis Thank you for the advice. I sometimes struggle with articles. đĽš
"with the articles", cuz you are referring to them, only them, specifically them. No i w sumie to rozumiem bo teĹź jestem Polakiem, tylko ten kanaĹ to nie miejsce do pisania po polsku wiÄc na tym zakoĹczÄ. So yeah, like this. Many polish people struggle with them cuz polish doesn't really have them in the same way, you could explain it by looking at a/an like some "jakiĹ, jakaĹ, jakieĹ" but this still is not the same as these words in polish
Whats difference between if only and wish?
what is different between "in" and "into"? I mean what does "Into" mean
Hello! Could anyone please explain the difference between "at the end of the day" and "in the long run''?
the content seems rather reliable
This short handout deals with which article to use before a noun -- "a" or "an."
the content seems trust-worthy
they even listed some exceptions
"at the end of the day" focuses on something being ultimately some way. Like, at the end of the day we are all humans and we make mistakes. Like a final conclusion. "in the long run" is used when youre talking about goals and plans in life, like "majoring in literature proved to be unhelpful in the long run"
Do you think how certainty of will? 100%?
Aaa like ''in the long run'' is more long-term right
Yeah. Like, in the long run, I think that my existence is absolutely useless and will be useless
Got it, thank you!
Wonderful
Good example btw
Thank you very much. Sometimes I feel like a poet. I wake up and think like this
I think it sounds like some symptoms of a disease that should be treated with sedatives and many other drugs being dosed regularly, but your version sounds cuter so I strongly believe you must be right

Everything that looks cute must be true
Can anyone tell me what does German mean here?
in German = in the German language
people in Germany speak German
Thanks bro
do americans sometimes use the second conditional instead of the third one?
for example an american might say
It would be better if you didn't help me(referring to the past)
or
It would have been better if you didn't help me
instead of
It would have been better if you hadn't belped me
Hello
Could someone say if âmay beâ is appropriate to fill that sentence âTomorrow I am going to speak to my neighbors and ask that the lights __________ reduced or removed.â
If not, what would be better to fulfill it?
ive already looked it up, but i still dont understand the difference between 'goods' and 'assets'. Could anybody please help me?
good is a word used for tangible item like food,clothing, etc
asset can also be sold and bought but they are a broader financial term that refers to anything valued owned by an individual or a company, e.g: real estate
you can ask chat gpt if google doesn't show the results you are looking for
I wouldn't say it would be incorrect to use may be in this example, but it sounds unnatural. A more natural way could be "Tomorrow I'm going to ask my neighbors that their lights be dimmed or turned off."
The phrase may be is more often used in a suggestive setting.
E.g. It may be useful my neighbors dim their lights so I can play on my computer easier."
there's alot of ways to say it i think
could be, are
That is another way.
hello, when does the book club usually starts?
Could I use should as a modal of possibility?
when will the conversational club be available? I need to practise on speaking.
Hi, I've got a question
How do I determine when to use 'nowadays' with the present simple and when to use it with the present continuous
@arctic tiger @flat rune check the event calendar near the search function under the server banner. All the scheduled events are listed there with the next meeting times.
Certainly
so how certain is it?
ty.. one more question
does the position of 'now' determine the tense of the sentence?
so how certain is it
e.g. He now shares a flat with his friend.
and
He is sharing a flat with his friend now.
so when it's related to the permanent situations around the present time we use PS?
thanks for helping me... I see that these two tenses (PS & PC) can be tricky sometimes although they look simple
Hmmm that is interesting think largely reliant on context as I have seen conflicting information about the degrees of certainty between could and should. However, I think generally should is more certain than couldâŚ.could means âI can do it but maybe I will not.â Where should means âI ought to do it, but maybe I will not.â
about 90%?
It would depend upon how strong the compulsion to do that thing is.
I guess
I would hesitate to assigns percentage of certainty to it
âI should save money but at the end of the week I have nothing left and still have not paid my billsâ would be almost 100% certain person will not follow through. âI should save money, but prefer to buy coffee every day at Starbucks.â Has a higher degree of certainty, letâs say 75%-90% that they could save money if they set different priorities.
Hi, I have the TOEFL test on wednesday, and I was wondering if by chance there was anyone experienced with it, who could give me some advice to score as many points as possible
You have lost the game already, should've been immersing by listening since a long time ago
jk. you didn't lose anything. Immerse as long as you have time left for it
You had me in the first half ngl
immersing boosts every single one of your skills anyway, especially listening
but thx for the advice !
these tests often like to ask you questions based on the text you were supposed to read, which I hate because my short term memory is very bad, but I think you can adjust yourself to this by reading short/medium articles and training yourself to visualize everything they've got. Focus intensively, kind of, realize the details
they do the same with listening, which I hate as well because am simply very bad at remembering who said what and why, but well training yourself to visualize what's happening and remembering it as... a visual story, might help
and get yourself regular 8h sleep + 2l water intake everyday, otherwise you can't focus and score high
yeah ive relalized that and im trying to specialize myself in these exercises to only focus on the arguments made in the listening and reading passages
I recall reading that sleeping less than this regularly has a similar effect on brain as alcohol
same for dehydration
Hello guys
I know that of the meanings of "to bear" is to "endure, to withstand", but does it also mean "carry"?
I am not sure about it
Greeting
bear verb (BRING)
[ T ] formal
to carry and move something to a place:
- At Christmas the family all arrive at the house bearing gifts.
- Countless waiters bore trays of drinks into the room
- The sound of the ice cream van was bore into the office on the wind.
How difficult is english? (compared to othrr languages)
Thanks
So it's related to "bring"
It depends on what languages you are talking about
For example, slavic languages are completely different from english
In polish, for example there are only three tenses (past, present and future). There is not something kind of "present simple" or "present continuous" in polish.
So, one of the difficulties that might occur while learning english is that there are much more tenses that one needs to remember. One needs to remember a tense's grammar and understand when it's suitable to use it
ok thanks
If we assume a question of multiple choice like this:
(Pronoun) now ŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮ (For example: to school)
- goes 2) is going
The answer is definitely "goes" because anyways we can't put "now" before the "is" right? If it's continuous then the sentence put by whoever in the world would be He ŮŮŮŮŮŮ now ŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮ to school therefore 'He is now going to school' and not 'He now is going to school' as it sounds both wrong and weird.
am I right ma friends?
Right!
He goes to school
He is now going to school
Now he is going to school
tysm <333333
depends on who's learning it, most europeans will find it anywhere between easy for the dutch, medium (for the french or germans or Italians), or rather difficult for slavs
if somebody speaks asian languages natively, like east or southeast asians, or some south asians, then the problem is bigger...
Yeah, I definitely agree with you.
Cheating bad
)
btw all studies cheating
Hello friends
Uh
Still need help?
Ping me if anyone needs help with anything Iâm almost always online
hello guys
Do "mesmerizing", "bewitching" and "enchanting" mean pretty much the same? Do the last two convey more magical sense?
@vale portal
depends on the context
i do believe the 2 convey more magical bits however
if you are talking about in lets say looks they are essentially the same
@crimson vortex
so can we use these words to refer to something extremely beautiful?
@vale portal Thank you. I have just learn that "compassion" means "sympathy", but if the verb derived from "sympathy" is "to sympathize", so what is the verb derived from "compassion"? It can't be "to compass"
and can one use these two words to express one's understanding of others feelings in informal way?
I am asking beacuse these two words sound pretty formal to me
Compassionate
Well
Thatâs the main one
Compassionating is one
And compassionated
Compassionated is past tense
While compassionating is present
@crimson vortex
okay
so adjective that describes a sympathetic person (compassionate person) is the same as the verb (to compassionate)?
Compassion actually means empathy, so empathize is the verb. You would call them a compassionate or empathetic person.
Sympathy means âto pityâ Empathize means âto feel with someoneâ
They are similar concepts but not the same
Empathy means you feel what another person is feeling, sympathy is you feel sorry for them
Sorry, i dont understand what exactly "feel sorry" means. Is it always related to understanding sorrow, miseries and bad things?
one can also say stunning, astounding, astonishing, charming, splendid etc
sometimes the word play never ends
Guys if i wanna introduce myself
Can i start with " my name is Daniel and i wanna tell you a little bit about me, now lets get to it "
Hello
"Futures for the red metal have fallen by over 5% in London this week amid a broad retreat thatâs also battered aluminum,..."
Why is there the " 's ", is it a grammar mistake or? âĄ
so does "feel sory" and "to sympathize" mean "to pity", "to understand someone's sorrow", whereas "to emathize" means "to understand feelings of others whatever they are (love, happiness, sorrow, fear)"?
okay
Thank you đ
mb for the misinformation
Oh, i asked ChatGPT and formed my opinion about these terms: "To sympathize" means generally feel sorry for someone. "To empathize" means deep understanding of others' feelings because you have experienced the same yourself. "To show compassion" means to sympathize, but be willing to or want to help those, who you sympathize with. "To pity" means to just feel sorry for someone, but their sorrow is distant to you and you might not understand their feelings whatsoever, you just feel sorry for them
by the way, can anyone explain how to use "to head" to mean "to go"? I have heard a lot of phrases such as "head to", "head towards", "head over", "head out" and i dont know how to use this verb properly. Could anyone explain how to use it and what exactly the aforementioned phrases mean?
https://tutor.afutai.com/ This website is great for all things learning. And you can quiz yourself!
"im going to head to the super market" (im going to the super market)
"im going to head to the gas station" (im going to go the gas station)
"i'll be heading over there shortly" (i'll be going over there shortly)
"they're heading towards you" (they're going towards you)
"stop! you're heading the wrong way!" (stop! you're going to the wrong way!)
"i don't know where they're heading" (i don't know where they're going)
"where are you heading?" (where are you going?)
"im heading in that direction" (im going in that direction)
"im going to head to your location" (im going to go to your location)
"im gonna head out" (im gonna leave)
@crimson vortex hope this helps
just don't say you're gonna give somebody a head
đđđđđđđ
I remember i told that someone
I wanted to say heads up
hello, whats the difference between 2 words: through and throughout
Hi, i saw a community on reddit called tiktokCringe, could anyone tell me what does 'cringe' here mean?
Thank you a lot!
very bad
This word is used as a slang when you feel awkward and ashamed about something funny or disgusting
So if I say
( that I do has nothing to do with you )
Does * that I do * work like a noun?
Thanksđ
No, this sentence doesn't make sense with "that I do" at the beginning
The correct form would be "what I do"
what based on mean like something is based on something
it depends what context it is used in
Guys as a hobby should i say "listening to music" or " listening music"
Through means to go in or start something at one place and go out or end at another.
E.g.
I drove through the tunnel.(Going in one side, going out the other)
I read through the book.(Started at the beginning, ended at the end)
Throughout means every aspect of a place of object.
E.g. There are a bountiful amount of red mushrooms throughout the forest, so be careful!
Exactly!
E.g. Spells are based on magic.
It should be "listening to music".
You never "listen something", always "listen to something"
Whats the difference between so too and very
That was just answered here âď¸ @acoustic geyser
Good morning everyone, is there any difference between "she is cheating on me" and "she is cheating me"?
I suppose both mean the same in modal use of dishonesty, untrustworthy, and all around crude behavior and actions. However, both do have different implications.
Cheating on me means someone has broken your trust in some way and doesn't reciprocate mutual feelings in a relationship.
Cheating me means someone has hidden information from you in a deal of some sort or just upright did not keep to their word.
"To cheat on someone" means to be unfaithful in a relationship (ie. to date or have sex with someone when you're in a monogamous relationship with someone else).
"To cheat someone" means to trick or deceive someone to get something unfairly, usually in the context of betting/gambling, making a deal, or doing business. For example, "She cheated me out of my money" means that she unfairly took your money, maybe by cheating at a bet or breaking an agreement.
Thanks for the explanationđ
Got it. Thanks for the explanationđ
You're probably right, but without that nessicary context we don't know.
Well, the exact question was "Does 'that I do' work like a noun?", to which the answer is a definite no. There was no evidence to suggest in any way that he meant as a fragment of a larger phrase.
My guess would be he was translating from his native language or another one where maybe "that I do" can be a noun by itself, or there was just some misunderstanding about the English form.
But I agree that it doesn't hurt to elaborate that it can work as part of a larger noun phrase.
"Anal" is slang that means "obsessively clean, attentive, or nitpicky"
Dude, that sounds kinda..... weird.
Are you angry at me?
... No? You made a comment and I added my thoughts. Nothing more. Disagreeing with something you said is not a personal attack. (And then I also partly agreed with you.)
what grammar does it work like?
"that I do" could work as a relative clause (eg. "This is the hobby that I do"), although out of context it isn't exactly anything grammatically; it's just a fragment.
My point was it's a definite no that it works as a noun on its own. It doesn't, unless it's something like "'That I do' is the first thing I heard him say." - if we want to count that type of use, then literally anything works as a noun and the question is meaningless, lol.
" ...no evidence to suggest in any way" seems very definitive and final
Fair, I suppose. Maybe the "in any way" is a bit excessive.
But the part within the parentheses lacks punctuation and capitalization...which could be taken as some evidence in a way
Maybe, maybe not. It's very common to not always use proper punctuation and capitalization on Discord. Again though, the question was asking about "that I do" alone, nothing indicating that he meant as part of a larger phrase. That's what I was referring to. You could be right that the part in parentheses may have been quoted from a larger sentence, who knows. But the question as asked was unambiguously about just "that I do".
what is difference between "we are managed to do something" and "we can do something" ?
"We are managed to do something" wouldn't be correct. It should be "We manage to do something" (simple present tense, would be kind of unusual to say but could work in the right context) or "We managed to do something" (simple past tense).
We managed to do something. = We succeeded in doing something. It's implied that the "something" was difficult and/or took effort to do.
We can do something. (simple present tense) = We are able to do something; we have the ability to do it. Depending on context, it could also mean we have permission to do it, or it might be a suggestion for us to do it
âlisten something is comingâ 
"listen, something is coming" ;)
xD Yeah, but not sure if this is the best place for that kind of joke with people coming here to learn English, lol. Wanted to make sure nobody got confused
Alr mb
Guys i need native speaker who can help me correct some stories
Who is willing to help me
Nah not really
Heyo
Present perfect tense is driving me up the wall
anyways
In our book, one of the present perfect continuous keywords is 'over the past [no.] + [time]' e.g. over the past 2 weeks...
but ain't this suitable for usage w/ the present perfect tense as well? the present perfect continuous tense is used for actions that began in the past and continue up to the present but that keyword doesn't indicate that the action continues up to the present time
e.g. I ŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮŮ a lot of books over the past two weeks.
ANSWER: have been reading
How would I know this continues up to the present
Well, over the past two weeks, so starting two weeks ago and continuing till the current day
this is typical for present perfect continuous
that there is a given period of time and it also includes present
I've been doing something for X. Have you been studying it for Y? She hasn't been attending her college for 7 months already. Since January of last year, I've been following joe biden on twitter
o yea, thanks for the clarification
"ain't" sounds kinda odd when the rest of your speech is not this loose, very casual, and low effort
just go for isn't if you can. I just suggest
Hi, everyone! I need some help with the phrase "try one's luck". Does this phrase always require a pronoun, or is it possible to use just "try luck" alone? For example, as a text on a website button
I see, thank you so much for the answer. Is there a reason for that or is it just a rule to memorize?
Hello, which school textbooks are you using to learn English? I need from A1 to C1 level... PDFs for free... DM me
اŮŮŮ Ůعا ٠ا تسدŮا
Since you need a short text for a button, consider alternatives, e.g.:
Try it!
Go for it!
You can place some text above the button explaining what it leads to, like: "Here you can test your luck", or "Are you lucky?" Certainly, you need to provide some explanation to the button.
It means "an intense, sharp, or striking quality" according to the Oxford Dictionary. In this case, a quality of the character or behavior.
What is an "Oronym"?
A string of words or phrase that sounds the same as another string of words or phrase but is spelt differently
ex: âIce screamâ / âI screamâ
Ice cream, not ice scream
What is the difference between ''could have v3'' and ''would have v3''?
the same difference as between could and would, but deeper into the past
these two tend to be used in the 3rd conditional, and mixed conditionals
Like umm... "If I didn't like thinking, I would have never learned anything"
this is a mixed conditional, if + past simple + future perfect with would
Or in the third conditional, which is If + past perfect + future perfect with would
Like in "If I had been able to be with her, I would have used my opportunity"
Also:
If I had had some money, I would have helped her.
this is more of a "I would have done it" situation, so I would have, if the condition had been true. Kinda like I do or I do not. Either yes or no. Just focusing on the action
If I had had some money, I could have helped her.
This is more about the ability to help, not exactly the fact of me helping or me not helping
"had had" cuz of past perfect
from "to have"
Dont get too beat up about her
Whats this?
Is it right?
"i was beating myself into the ground lately" is it right?
"You need to get your life in order" whats this
it works, but 'beating myself up' is a way of saying being hard on oneself over something
this is a way of saying your life is a mess and you need to fix it. maybe bills are unpaid or you don't have a job, so you need to organize and get back on track
Thanks
On the uptick , whats the meaning
it could be
"Im just not off to see the wizard" whats the meaning
'off to see the wizard' is a reference to the old movie 'the wizard of oz'
They are not gonna go and see the Wizard or sum like that
50 Cent & G-Unit links up with Complex's Joe La Puma for an episode of Sneaker Shopping at New York's Flight Club.
Subscribe to Complex for More: https://www.youtube.com/complex?sub_confirmation=1
Check out more of Complex here:
http://www.complex.com
https://twitter.com/ComplexMag
https://www.facebook.com/complex
http://instagram.com/complexma...
Here
Maybe he meant "he's not gonna go too deep into the sneaker thingy but he knows da basic stuff"
I'm not really sure brother but that's what I think
It's a reference to the movie The Wizard of Oz. There's an explanation in the comments
When do we use aint in what context?
In standard English or when speaking formally, you never use it.
Ain't is an informal dialectal variant of is/are/am not, commonly associated with the US South. I'm not > I ain't, you aren't > you ain't, he/she/it isn't > he/she/it ain't, we aren't > we ain't, etc.
BEV?
Also known as: AAVE, African American Vernacular English, BEV, Black English Vernacular
Hello guys, I am seeking a new friend who is a native English speaker. We can work together and earn something valuable together. Come on, friends! I am looking forward to your DM
Hi friends, can you help me?
I just wanna know if the following sentence is correct
"what age do babies crawl with?"
That makes sense? The word order is correct?
at what age do babies begin to crawl?
Ok, thank you
I don't study grammar but I notice that there is that pattern in which, sometimes, the word "with" stays at the end of the sentence...I'm trying to understand this
example: who are you going with?
the formal way would be: with whom are you going?
but people don't talk like that anymore
The problem here is that "with" is the wrong preposition. We say something happens "at" an age, or "when [person] is/was __ years old", not "with" an age.
Your order was fine, just not the word "with". It should be "What age do babies crawl at?" or "At what age do babies crawl?"
Note: You may find some resources that say that a proper English sentence should never end with a preposition (like "at", "with", "in", "to", etc.). However, this is prescriptivist advice and not accurate to how English is actually spoken. Most language authorities don't support this as a rule anymore, although some people still follow it.
(Prescriptivism is when you teach the language the way you think it should be, rather than how it actually is. In this case, this "rule" was created because people wanted English grammar to be more like Latin.)
Bravo thats a good point
Guys i need story about listening music, i couldn't find anything like that
About listening to music?
Hello, everyone! I need a native English speaker to help me judge the grammaticality of this sentence 'Jane runs too fast. No one can catch.' How do you rate its grammaticality?
no one can catch her
"No one can catch" needs an object: Jane runs too fast. No one can catch her. The rest is grammatically correct.
"Catch" without an object doesn't make sense in this context. The most logical meaning would be "No one has the ability to catch anything in general."
What do you mean by "story"?
Oh, I got it now! Thank you for the explanation
Hello I would like to know how to pronounce "know"
youve got like at least 10 different speakers pronouncing it there
forvo is a great thing for looking up pronunciations of words
while being free
so id recommend
you could also look it up in here
they got the IPA
If you're confused by the K, words that start with "kn" are only pronounced with N. The K is silent.
know, knit, knee, knife, knight and so on begin with the sound /n/
If you're confused about the different vowel in "know" compared to words like "now", "how", or "cow", that's just English. That difference just has to be memorized, but usually "ow" is pronounced like in "now".
Thanks đ
Illusion means something that is likely misinterpreted by your senses, while delusion means a false belief about the external reality occurring especially in mental conditions.
Hi there đ¤. I want to know your thoughts about keeping a journal or diary in English. What are there benefits? Is it useful for improving my vocabulary? What do you think?
P. S: Sometimes when I write a text I use a translator because I canât make up sentences.
So if I become more eloquent in my daily entries, will it work?
What is the difference between a plane and a airplane ?
More specifically if I describe a lot of things that happened to me during the day.
A âplaneâ is a tool used to smooth or shape wood. Planes were invented thousands of years ago. An âairplaneâ or âaeroplaneâ is a winged machine that flies.
Yeah, I do it but i suggest combine it, you know?
Btw, where are you from?
OK thanks you guys, i don't even know thats there was a tool named "plane"
It seems like you are from native English speaking country., it isnât ?
How to say learning something but like without actually learning it
Maybe thats called "to cram"
'i crammed for this test'
Hello. I wouldn't say writing a journal or diary would improve your English even if you write just in English since you don't have to adhere to English rules. Journals are more utilized as a common way to cope with negative emotions or even express positive emotions in a controlled environment.
As for improving vocabulary, I suggest reading novels/books or flipping through a dictionary and taking notes on words you don't know and practice their usage.
id say it does not sound very beneficial. You can try, but it may not bring any real benefits. If I could start over right now, and forget few thousand words that I seemingly know, then I would definitely immerse more (listening) and note down new words that I encountered. Not in a random place. I would, and I actually do right now, use SRS (spaced repetition system) in a software like Anki. It is an app to manage notes, and also distribute learning material over some time, very rich in features and free
Whats means "im from trenches"
'i'm from the trenches.'
it means you had a hard life and fought hard. it's a reference to the trenches used to fight in world war one and two
Gotta remember this one
Sounds so badass. And accurate. I should be using it
how was that phrase
like if im not mistaken, but not this one
if my mind dont lie me or something like that
something like if my memory serves me right
is there anyone here who is good at grammar ?
this is correct. or 'if i remember correctly' = often shortened to iirc
I haven't heard of the tool either, lol.
When referring to the flying machine, "plane" and "airplane" are interchangeable. There is no difference, except that "airplane" is a little more formal.
"Plane" can also mean "a flat surface or area", usually in a scientific context.
Can I use 'lessen' and 'lower' interchangeably?
lessen is more to reduce. lower can be directional or decrease
lessen isn't used as much as lower
Hi, using contraction like ÂŤÂ wanna, gonnaâŚÂ Âť in oral with strangers is too familiar or itâs common?
it is common and it can be used. Just avoid it when you are in a formal situation or you want to sound elegant/serious
if you want to sound very serious then you could, for example, say every word very clearly, leave 0,5-1 second spaces between the words, and avoid all the slangs and contractions. Like "I (one second break) want (one second break) to (again) do (again) this."
Or you are talking to a police officer, to a lawyer, in a court of law to a judge or somebody like this, or any other formal situation like talking to a boss or any other superior, then yeah you would like to avoid using contractions all the time
But that's not casual and chill anymore lol. That's very serious. Usually you just use the contractions, they exist for a reason
If I were to talk to you or any other stranger, I would definitely use contractions and slang words/phrases, and native speakers would too (they're often too lazy to speak without slang anyway)
hello, does "major" mean "the most important, the biggest". Does it imly "the most"?
For example, "sugar is a major source of caries" means sugar is the main, most important source, or it's just one of the most important ones?
In this context, it just means "big", "significant", "important".
If it were "the major source" instead of "a", it would imply the single biggest or most significant source
Hello! Does the phrase "2 years in a row" mean 4 years? Or no
as above. In a row means one after another. So, like:
Bird bird bird
Dog dog dog
You have two lines, each of the lines contains 3 words. The first line contains 3 birds in a row. The second line contains 3 dogs in a row
Thanks
And by the way, is it "to major math" or "to major IN math"?
And what exactly is "affection"? What is the difference between "affection", "fondness" and "love"?
major in math, for sure
My major is math. I major in math
I mean, I do not. But that's an example. You can also hear a word like "minor" in the same context
Some examples for you:
I minored in Spanish in college. I think you should probably major in astronomy and minor in physics. She chose physics as her major and minored in mathematics. He minored in international studies as part of his sociology degree. You couldn't major in linguistics at my college, but you could minor in it.
So what does minor mean?
Is it the antonym for "to major"?
So minor and major subjects are connected?
I confirm both
So if i major in math, can i minor in biology or not? Biology doesnt complement math
you probably can
If I major in Mandarin Chinese, I can minor in Japanese (I actually know this really happens at some unis)
Okay, thanks
By the way, can anyone explain this?
And what is the difference between "let go of something" and "let something go", apart from "forget about something". I mean, what is the difference on physical level
strongness is not a word, strength is the word
Okay, thanks, i supposed it was so
Also, what does "call out to someone" mean?
And what about "to speak up", but not in context of speaking louder through a phone
How do I flap t
Is the connotation negative?
I mean, one had wanted to conceal it before, but decided to speak up
What do you mean?
Okay, i see the difference now
English grammar doesn't seem difficult to me, but its vocabulary and prepositions that almost completely change the meaning of a word are the things i struggle with
"there are 21 countries or so" or
"there are 21 or so countries"?
or whatever?
Thanks a lot, because usually i use cambridgedictionary
Or collinsdictionary
By the way, do you suggest learning english by reading books? I almost never watch movies in english (sometimes youtube videos), but currently i am reading a light novel which is translated from japanese to english
alr ty
I do
That's me checking every 20th word
that's very good
I picked a very difficult book as my first one
And I do not regret
I'd definitely pick something difficult at first
Is it sarcasm?
But that's a challenge right. So, it's not very easy
it actually isn't
Okay,
What was that book?
Salem's lot by Stephen King
That's the way i've been unconsciously learning English for the past like 13 years lol
"10 soldier are estimated to be strong in the army."
Is it a correct sentence?
My question is that if we can use any adjective with "to be"
For example:
"The woman is thought **to be fat **according to average ."
"The painting is believed **to be beautiful **for many people."
Are these sentences correct? It just doesn't sound natural but correct? Or they are not correct?
correct.ďźI guessďź
So we can use any adjective with "to be".
Can you please say me those unrelated mistakes?
I come from China and want to improve my English through this server, but I find that many people don't pay much attention to grammar in daily communication, and there are many abbreviations similar to Chinese communication, which is a big challenge for me
- "10 soldier" should be "10 soldier__s__". There are 10 soldiers (plural), not just one.
- "... estimated to be strong in the army" doesn't make sense. Do you mean that there are only 10 strong soldiers in the entire army? And in what way is their strength "estimated"?
But yes, any adjective can be used in this way with "to be"
Thank you so much for answers
Okay it's clear now, thank you!
What means do your homework
Slang
Like the guy says im gonna do my research
Then the other guy says i would say do your homework but its alright
Good morning, what do you usually say about a building that's very old and have historic meaning?
I meant how would you usually describe a building like that?
what is the difference between: You mustnt park here You cant park here You arent supposed to park here
Yeah, to emphasize it's so old (probably have lasted for hundreds years or even longer)
That's what u would usually describe a building as old as that?
i wouldn't really use the first, the second is a statement, and the third is a suggestion/passive-aggressive statement
does musnt sound formal?
Thanks, if that's first word come to your mind as native, i think that's probably the word i look for
Got it, thanks again, btw, what do u call the paper a person holding in hands when making a speech?
maybe..hmmâŚI call it âspeech draftâmost of the time
If you mean a paper that reminds them what to say in the speech, you'd usually call it their "notes" or "script", depending on how closely it reflects what they say.
"Notes" would be if it's just that: notes to remind them of the points they want to talk about, but not a full draft of exactly what they'll say. A "script" would be if they've actually written their speech out and are reading more or less word-for-word from the text.
Im a beginner actually and was inspired by your explanation! Thank you very muchđĽ°
Very comprehensive, thanksđ
I have a question about the capitalization of proper nouns in Chinese fantasy novels.
In Chinese fantasy (xianxia) novels, characters go through different stages of cultivation (training) to become more and more powerful.
For example, one might start at the Qi Refining Stage, progress to the Foundation Stage and then the Golden Core Stage.
My question is: I know proper nouns have to be capitalized, but in the case of the names of the various stages (i.e. Qi Refining, Foundation, Golden Core etc.), is it grammatically correct to capitalize "stage" or not? Should it be "Qi Refining Stage" or "Qi Refining stage"?
After reading a bunch of manhuas, I think it's much more feeting to also capitalize "stage"
Not sure if it's grammatically correct or not, but it sure sounds much more natural
is there anyone who knows jijeele countryđŠ
according to the internet, it's somewhere in Somalia
Ok guys is me again
I make a sentence
What a wonderful period! I will finished my vacation course before we were be operating
Any grammar problems?
yeah, the "before we were be operating" feels wrong
What a wonderful period! I will have finished my vacation course before we operate the game. Does it make sense?
Hey
"The collective wisdom of a group of people is just going to be smarter than any one individual"
Means smarter than any individual group, or any individual person?
I'd translate it as the first option, google translate gives it to me as the second one tho
What a wonderful period! I WILL HAVE FINISHED my vacation course before we WILL BE OPERETING (/ or, playing the game )
This sentence is comparing the collective wisdom of a group to the wisdom of âany ONE individual â therefore the sentence is demonstrating that the group is smarter than one person.
Thank you iotter, it s a weird structure for my native language. I got it now, gotta make sure to practice it now
I think both @noble stag and @fathom helm gave you good options. I wanted to add another possibility. âWhat a wonderful period! I need to finish my vacation course before we will run the game.â
What is âused toâ exactly? Is it a tense, mood or something?
I used to play football.
Can I use would to mean was going to? Is there a difference between them in this usage?
Thank you
I would run but it rained.
I would go there but there were no more tickets left.
Can I use would like that?
Good evening. How do you say the time when minutes past the hour? Like 11: 05, if you don't say the exact time, would you usually say: it's minutes past 11?
hello hello and hello again
it's f*** difficult . i need some explain this sentence
why is "using this software" used in the sentence "have you made any mistakes while using this software"? Is it possible to use this together with the Present Perfect time and what does it even mean?
im sorry guys i repeat that
but i wanna understand
If you're wanting to say a number of minutes after an hour, you can say "it's 5 after/past 11." to convey it's 11:05.
If you're wanting to say a number of minutes before an hour, you can say "it's 5 until/before 11." to convey it's 10:55.
You can also use quarter and half for 15 and 30 mins, respectively, for either scenario above.
it is using this software, because thats what "while" and "when" demand
while using it = during the time when you were using it
during the usage
Thanks brođ
Your prof pic and the name, though 
I donât understand, does this mean that Iâm currently using the software?
after all, there is tense present continues
hello
it is not present continuous
"while using..." has no tense on its own
this is called "present participle", thats not a tense, its just the form of a verb that has -ing
so, "while doing something" doesn't even have a tense on its own
we know what it is talking about, the tense, by the rest of the sentence
so "I was doing the dishes while listening to music" is past continuous, etc, but "while listening" alone has no tense
"I was doing" is the tense that tells us when it was
Hi
Ive just seen a person said that:
i'm going to be saying
What does it mean?
Is it a prediction in the present or something else?
Um... what is the difference?
The words?
I mean which one should I use in the context?
I've just searched Google, it says that be going to be saying is focusing about continuous action than be going to say.
Oh
Anyway, thanks.
I give it hundred percent or i give it my hundred
I'll give it one hundred percent is correct.
"I give it my hundred" isn't a complete idea- it needs more info.
Put in work
hmm ok, thank you
and do I understand correctly that *I'm doing " means that right now I'm doing something?
put in 
putin 
yes, this one is present continuous. It means what you said, unless there is some context to change it
like "I'm scoring full marks on my finals next year" is also present continuous, but this time it's about the future. Cuz of "next year"
what the meaning?
kid is nintendo fun systemic cancer. ten? not nine, that is are when the is original. The bound is kid, just ten. Kid named ness, not the are is when the % is not ninten the do not is are when super big ten sister? Ness is the when are kid the white when sprite is mcdonalds %100. But if the the bullshit, i think! I
friend message me
Hello! Is it appropriate to say ''wound'' instead of ''insult'' ? Like here : " I didn't mean to wound you "
seems like it is
I wouldn't like to myself, though. I like to make my speech clear and avoid ambiguous things like this, when a word has few meanings. I usually would say "to wound" as in physically cut my skin tissue and harm myself
it must be
Hey
How to say:
"She thought she wasn't cute enough to make an impression at him"
But better I mean it sounds so bad to me that sentence as I made it up
Not at all
It works, but it sounds odd to me in this context. I would say "I didn't mean to hurt / offend / insult you."
