#šļ½english-questions
1 messages Ā· Page 48 of 1
Oh. Well you talked like you're a linguist so I was confused. My bad for thinking you know what you're talking about
"Was" because the noun (subject of sentence) that follows is singular, so you need singular verb.
The Lion Light system, developed by Kenyan inventor Richard Turere, consists of LED lights installed around the perimeter of livestock pastures. Powered with _____ the blinking LEDs keep lions away at night, thus protecting the livestock without risking harm to the endangered lions.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "energy collected, by solar panels, during the day"
- "energy collected by solar panels during the day"
- "energy collected by solar panels during the day,"
- "energy, collected by solar panels during the day,"
š Please help me.āļø
could someone check this out for me? feel like there are some words only existing in textbook
@worn sable 10k people online happy to help ( if you message me I assume you want to pay for a class
Powered with energy collected by solar panels during the day, the blinking LEDs keep lions away at night
-
is wrong because that's not where you put the comma in a relative clause
-
is wrong because you need a comma at the end to separate the 2 clauses (Powered with... + the blinking LEDs...)
-
is wrong for the same reason as 1)
Check what out? The highlighted words?
Thanks, @supple holly .
the glossary part
I have a question
They look like words I would hear if I was a middle aged man living in the US in the 80's
Not common, but they exist
Why does everyone expect that I have time to personally answer everyone's questions? 10k members online and I am the choosen one? lol
yea probablyš so thats why I need someone who speaks english point them out
cuz you're teacher grant
He asked politely, and didn't demand that you answer. And you're a teacher
If you don't have time or don't want to, a simple "no" would do
Of course he was polite
that is not the point
So you think teachers should be dm'd to answer questions?
Yep. The point is you went on here to complain about it when you could have just refused in the DMs
Well no one said you can't DM the teachers
Pls someone stop this guy
Kimcheese obviously
Because?
this is the greatest english hub beef of all time

I don't want to act as the police here. I may have gone off topic and I apologize. Did anyone have any advice for Eddie as to the answers to his questions?
here
I am off to bed. Good night š
I read this somewhere.
- Be a 'top-level-asker'
Most people are too scared to ask important, higher-status or more good-looking people for things.
They don't want to feel the sting of rejection, and they don't believe they'll get a yes.
But those that go far know that to get a 'no' doesn't cost them anything if they can be OK with the NO.
And so they ask thirty people who are 'out of their league' and get one yes that 'unfairly' propels them.
And I am okay with no of @novel moth .
And thanks to @supple holly for supporting me.
Also thanks to @novel moth for accepting and replying to my message, though you didn't provide answer.
Eloquent man. You are cool
The life spans of rockfish vary greatly by species. For instance, the colorful calico rockfish (Sebastes dalli) can survive for a little over a _____ the rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus) boasts a maximum life span of about two centuries.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "decade: while" 2) "decade. While" 3) "decade; while" 4) "decade, while"
Can anyone tell me please.What's the difference between and where we use could/would have and could/would have been ?
I never understood the usage of the semicolon
But I'm gonna say 4)
The conjuction "while" doesn't need a semicolon to connect two related clauses to each other. It just needs a comma
You might want to ask someone else to make sure
Thanks.
"Have" is active voice (when you do something)
"Have been" is passive voice (when something is affected by you)
Both "could have (been)" and "would have (been)" are used to talk about something that didn't actually happen, but could have happened (see what I mean?)
You're most likely going to see it in a conditional type 3 sentence
When external forces are applied to common glass made from silicates, energy builds up around minuscule defects in the material, resulting in fractures.
Recently, engineer Erkka Frankberg of Tampere University in Finland used the chemical_____________to make a glassy solid that can withstand higher strain than
silicate glass can before fracturing.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "compound, aluminum oxide" 2) "compound, aluminum oxide," 3) "compound aluminum oxide," 4) "compound aluminum oxide"
Okay understood... thank you for your help 
"Compound" is the adjective, while "aluminium oxide" is the name of the chemical.
=> "Compound" cannot be in the middle of the name, but has to be before it.
All other answers are wrong because you don't need a comma here
Thanks, Kimcheese.
But aluminium oxide can be the name of a chemical compound.
It can be a noun in this case.
Oh. I must have misread the question
The answer is still 4) though
Engineer used the chemical compound
=> What chemical compound?
=> Aluminium oxide
=> Has it been mentioned before?
=> No, so it must be written out and not be non-defining (between 2 commas)
This was my flow of thought to arrive at the answer
Wow, thanks. I have never thought like that.
Bengali author Toru Duttās A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields (1876), a volume of English translations of French poems, _____scholars' understanding of the transnational and multilingual contexts in which Dutt lived and worked.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "has enhanced"
- "have enhanced"
- "are enhancing"
- "enhance"
Millions of thanks to @supple holly .
The subject "A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields" is a book. One book. The next phrase also mentions that it is a single volume.
=> Subject is singular, so verb must be too
Circadian rhythms, which are controlled by the [bodies biological clock], influence body temperature, hormone release, cycles of sleep and wakefulness, and other bodily functions
Choose the answer to replace the underlined section that most effectively improves the quality of writing.
- "No change"
- "body's biological clock"
- "bodies' biological clock"
- "bodys biological clock"
2
Thanks.
After the United Kingdom began rolling out taxes equivalent to a few cents on single-use plastic grocery bags in 2011. plastic-bag consumption decreased by up to ninety________taxes are subject to what economists call the ārebound effect*: as the change became normalized, plastic-bag use started to creep back up.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "percent, such"
- "percent. Such"
- "percent and such"
- "percent such"
'It was obviously a tactical maneuver designed to make them let down their guard. But Walt was onto her. It wouldnāt work.'
Hallo! Could anyone please explain the meaning of "be onto" here?
Walt realizes what she is planning, sees through her tricks, etc
It generally means the other person is doing something sneaky but you know they are
These two sentences aren't related (both subjects are different as well). They're about the same topic but not the same point/thing, so you need a period mark to separate them
Thanks.
Studies have shown that employees are happier, healthier, and more productive when they work in a temperature-controlled environment.
Choose the answer to replace the underlined section that most effectively improves the quality of writing.
- "No change"
- "healthier, and they are more"
- "healthy, and more"
- "healthier, being more"
lol. There are four left including that question.
I'm in a meeting so might not be able to answer
Got it. Thanks, Kimcheese.
Take your time.
"It was getting quite a 'workout'". Can the word 'workout' mean something like test of your mental abilities?
Yeah, thatās its metaphoric meaning.
How to know wether to say the screen shrunk or went shrunk last time
"Went tight / shrunk" maybe?
I'd just say "The screen shrunk last time"
Please help me with this.
Which one do you think is the correct answer
second
It wouldn't be wrong, but the first
"and they are more" is unnecessary if they already stated the subject in the beginnning
Thank you, @mint seal .
The more diverse and wide ranging an animal's behaviors, the larger and more energy demanding the animal's brain tends to be.________from an evolutionary
perspective, animals that perform only basic actions should allocate fewer resources to growing and maintaining brain tissue. The specialized subtypes of ants within colonies provide an opportunity to explore this hypothesis.
Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?
- "Subsequently,"
- "Besides,"
- "Nevertheless,"
- "Thus,"
again, you should attempt the question first
Hegra is an archaeological site in present-day Saudi Arabia and was the second largest city of the Nabataean Kingdom (fourth century BCE to first century CE). Archaeologist Laila Nehme recently traveled to Hegra to study its ancient___into the rocky outcrops of a vast desert, these burial chambers seem to blend seamlessly with nature.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "tombs. Built"
- "tombs and built"
- "tombs, built"
- "tombs built"

If there are a lot of questions, I suggest you do all of them before sending them over. We don't do homework for you.
lol, I already did them all.
It is not a homework. It's a test. And the result? Failed. Not sure how many problems I did wrong.
They don't tell me what score I got. They just tell me I failed.
Your test didn't come with a solution?
Can't you send your test with your answers written on it?
And the number of problems? It's not much. All 13.
And I already solved most of them, thanks to Kimcheese.
"First", I would say.
2 would make it clearer and easier to say.
Peo is here. Most reliable Eng Hub member
Thanks, @forest solar .
The life spans of rockfish vary greatly by species. For instance, the colorful calico rockfish (Sebastes dalli) can survive for a little over a _____ the rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus) boasts a maximum life span of about two centuries.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "decade: while" 2) "decade. While" 3) "decade; while" 4) "decade, while"
I can't agree more.
I did choose it, thanks, Peo.
And I have two more questions that I got answers from other source.
Could you kindly check if the answers are correct?
Sorry to bother you again
When a plant in Seattle, Washington was redesigned for more natural light, the company was able to enjoy annual electricity cost reductions of $ 500.000 [each year].
Choose the answer to replace the underlined section that most effectively improves the quality of writing.
- "No change"
- "every year"
- "per year"
- "Delete the underlined portion and end the sentence with a period"
Someone told me that fourth one is correct.
I was sweeping over it once again and I found that it doesn't imply one to be "still seeing something until the present" to use "I ve seen"
It's talking about a reduction in cost. $500k is not the price anymore, it's just an amount. Besides, the word "annual" (every year) was already mentioned.
So 4) is correct
So it should be right anyway
Last problem:
Journalists have dubbed Gil Scott-Heron the āgodfather of rap," a title that has appeared in hundreds of articles about him since the 1990s. Scott-Heron
himself resisted the godfather________feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist,* the moniker he preferred.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- "nickname, however"
- "nickname, however;"
- "nickname, however,"
- "nickname; however,"
You already saw it, Kimcheese.
Someone says the third one is correct
I'm pretty sure 4) is correct
"However" signals the start of a new sentence (opposing idea) so there can't be a comma in front of it here
But because it's related to the sentence before it, we use a semicolon
Thanks to @supple holly , @distant oasis ,
@mint seal , @mellow geyser .
Special thanks to Kimcheese .
I am very grateful for your kind help.
Please bless my success in the test.
š„°
No worries, hope you have a good day or night
Regarding to the last question, please consider this.
Actually, I chose the fourth answer. And a native English speaker also chose the fourth. ChatGPT chose the fourth. And Kimcheese also chose fourth.
But I found this same problem online and there was the answer for it.
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation use between a main clause and two supplementary elements. In this choice, the commas after ānicknameā and āhoweverā are correctly used to separate the supplementary adverb āhoweverā from the main clause (āScott-Heron⦠nicknameā) on one side and the supplementary participial phrase (āfeeling⦠bluesologistā) on the other.
Choice A is incorrect because it fails to mark the boundary between the supplementary adverb āhoweverā and the supplementary phrase (āfeeling⦠bluesologistā). Choice B is incorrect because a semicolon canāt be used in this way to join the supplementary adverb āhoweverā and the supplementary phrase (āfeelingā¦bluesologistā). Choice D is incorrect because a semicolon canāt be used in this way to join the main clause (āScott-Heronā¦nicknameā) and the supplementary word and phrase (āhoweverā and āfeelingā¦bluesologistā). Moreover, placing the semicolon after ānicknameā illogically signals that the following information (Scott-Heronās feeling that the nickname didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the blues tradition) is contrary to the information in the previous clause (Scott-Heronās resistance to the nickname).
- Because you have already used annual in the sentence
Yes, @forest solar . Thanks. Please consider the problem above.
This is the problem I am mentioning about.
Should I choose the third?
I'll need to reread it a few times
š Thanks.
1
I think 3) is right yes. Sorry for my earlier answer. I thought that there was an independent clause after the blank space, but actually it was just an adverbial clause
If so then 3) is correct because the semicolon is to separate 2 related clauses. In this case, there is only 1, so we use the comma
Oh oops. Answer above @worn sable
lol, Thanks, @supple holly , @forest solar .
It is possible that answers vary between different people.
Think of it like this:
However, Scott resisted the godfather nickname, feeling that it didn't...
If you move the "however" to a more readable position, it's clear why you use a comma and not a semicolon
Usually exams try to have 1 single right answer to avoid dispute. Still exceptions but often it's just a subtle difference between the answers
Absolutely.
I would have left the however out altogether. It was not in spite of the nickname, that he preferred the moniker, rather he just preferred the moniker.
After reading the chat gt, i think it is just as confused, and it's hinting at the conclusion i have just placed here, but its not as good as RI and it's just gibbering on.
What is Hardy-har-har?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YztNYiZrzo
The "however" needs to be there because the earlier sentence said people called him "godfather", but he didn't like it. There's a contradiction here so the "however" expresses it
Well it doesn't need to be there but I think it sounds better with it
Sarcastic laughter
ive finally logged into a windows discord for the first time. I am so pissed with my phone, typing completely different messages to what I was typing. Long passages of crap from the AI keyboard. When I'd look up, it was meaningless and I had completely lost my chain of thought. Lets see how much editing I need to do with a real keyboard
OMG its just what I typed yayyayayayahhoooooo
yyaaaaaahhhooooooooo
so happy
s lets go back and see what kimchee is saying
Hey why you re not answering anymore @supple holly am I bothering you or what
I dont agree with any and including what you said @supple holly, because there is a comma following "however" in all options except #1. I agree with the use of however as a lead in to the complete contradiction (hence my choice of 1), but it must not be separated from the contradiction in this example with a comma, because it makes that clause incomplete, or grammatically incorrectly constructed with the comma. With a comma the following clause must be changed to :
Scott-Heron himself resisted the godfather nickname, however, feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist,* the moniker he preferred, he chose his moniker.
its a stupid sentence with the however, structure as it requires an alternate clause to follow it
I'm focused on another topic right now
so 1
Scott-Heron himself resisted the godfather nickname, however feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist",* the moniker he preferred.
Whatever. I guess I was right tho, and didn't like being talked like that. If you don't have time, next time just rephrase it. Thank you
It must have a comma after "however" because without it, "however" would be a different part of speech and wouldn't grammatically stand there.
Like I said before, if you just switch up the position of "however" and the adverbial clause, the sentence becomes simpler to analyze.
However, feeling that it didn't encapsulate his devotion [...], Scott resisted the godfather nickname.
You can think what you want, but once you give the wrong answer and insist on it without listening to others' opinions or verifying the answer, then you become the person who must rephrase "it"
I always listen. I just got problems with you here. And it's you who didn't verify the answer. Think again
putting the comma after the however, indicates that the following is a complete stand alone statement. If you read that statement, you will see that it is just one big adjectival clause
"feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist,* the moniker he preferred."
Nah
Consider replacing however with "and so it followed" and then "feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist,* the moniker he preferred." (+ rest of sentence that is missing here)
(OMG.... i've got a delete key also)
let me try and simplify the structure for demo purposes
The "however" applies for that whole sentence when compared to this one before it:
Journalists have dubbed...since the 1990s.
It doesn't apply to the whole adjectivial clause, because there are no contradictions within it. It is strictly to point out the difference between "people calling him godfather" and "him not liking it", which are 2 independent statements/sentences
The point of the "however" is:
People calling him godfather <> him not liking it
It isn't:
Him not liking it <> him preferring the other moniker
Hello sorry for interrupting you in the middle of the conversation..is really and for real and surely and for sure same ?
Peo hated phone keyboards, however preferring a computer keyboard. This is a full sentence. now if we put a comma after however, it turns the information following however into a new statement.... thisa can be written as 2 sentences thus: "Peo hated phone keyboards. However, preferring a computer keyboard." You can see that the second sentence is unfinished when a comma follows the however. It would require something like "Peo hated phone keyboards. However, preferring a computer keyboard, he bought one."
for real and for sure are adjective phrases applied to nouns, and really and surely are adverbs applied to verbs.
real means its correct, and sure means its certain
Oh okay thank youuuu 
The "however" isn't splitting the original sentence into two. Look at the second example in this picture. The only difference to its usual position at the beginning of a sentence, is that it's now standing in the middle of the sentence (stylistic choice or whatever). It doesn't have any effect other than to show the contradictory nature of this sentence when compared one before it
hey, who can help me in lear English? my level a2
Read the sentence with the pause at the comma, and without the pause and see if you can make sense of the second part if you use a pause.
@supple holly
Ask questions and people will help. If you want to pay for lessons, there is a teacher here who will teach for money.
https://www.hound-safe.com/cdn/shop/products/red-safety-cord.jpg?v=1654262235
is this can only be called a clip or there are some other names?
Clasp is an alternative
The pause must be there. We want "however" to mean "despite this"
Without the pause, it'd mean like "however much, no matter how much, in any way"
Bn so out for this into the sentence and read the second part and tell me it is a full message. What is it telling me?
Despite his hate for his godfather nickname,..... What
Read the what and tell me it makes sense as written there
The comma reemphasizes the following words expecting a complete statement to be used.
I'll listen later because I am at work
I think that's just because you're reading it that way lol. Give me a moment
@worn sable this is all for you
Pause however pause is basically a new sentence and so must have subject verb. It had no subject and no verb.
I keep telling you, it needs to be read with the earlier sentence to make sense
Yes, i agree, but the however, turns it into an independent statement
Because it breaks the however from the phrase
Feeling that it didn't encapsulate
= Because he felt that it didn't encapsulate
Scott resisted the nickname, however, because he felt that it didn't...
= However, Scott resisted the nickname because he felt...
Yes ... Keep going.. add the rest of it
Only and only if you put it at the front of the sentence, signaling that what follows is a sentence. It doesn't do the same when it is in the middle
But that's all there is to it
Feeling that it didn't encapsulate
= Because he felt that it didn't encapsulate
= However, Scott resisted the nickname because he felt (finish this with the phrase. It doesn't fit the structure as written)
However, Scott resisted the nickname because he felt that it didn't encapsulate his devotion to...bluesologist, (which was) the moniker he preferred
Seems perfectly normal to me
I would add a period or a comma before and after the however in this sentence.
In the problem presented, I would actually choose option 4
I am trying to convince kimcheese that a period if placed in the sentence as you suggest will make the whole, grammatically incomplete
now that im back on my new big keyboard... let me type it
Scott-Heron himself resisted the godfather nickname. However, feeling that it didnāt encapsulate his devotion to the broader African American blues music tradition as well as "bluesologist,* the moniker he preferred, ...
That was my initial choice
To be honest, I would rather put the However in the beginning of the whole thing. However, Scott-Heron himself...
If you do that, where is the main verb of the sentence after "however"
There is no subject or verb
YES THAT IIS WHAT IM SAYING
Where is the subject and verb?. That is the same regardless of whether there is a ';', ',' or '.' before the however. When you separate the however from the following with a comma though, you require a subject and verb to be inserted
but the answer then is 1 not 4
Oh, lol, sorry, @forest solar , @supple holly .
Don't argue with this.
Thanks for your effort.
You were friends, right?
You don't need to argue with such an English problem.
Both of you are kind and good guys.
Let's get it finished here.
It is for the betterment of mankind that we argue until the end of time, however it ends. (lol)
lol, great guy, @forest solar .
I raised a problem here for the first time today.
And I came to know two really nice ladies.
Hope you success.
lol, why did you edit it? You made a mistake?
š
I removed the comma,...
So as not to disturb my alpha waves
Sarcasm is not understood on the Internet.
Sorry for my sarcasm.
my phone died and so did my willingness to follow this topic. Good talk though, thanks for indulging me
nah we're mortal enemies even before you came
It was my sarcasm, when i put the comma in my post.

Edit "It's" to "It" so that it can be another sarcasm, Peo.š
That's my keyboard talking
Gottverdamt spell checker
I must learn to keep using my new computer discord.
Which one is more native - we immediately got used to it , we got used to it right away
both are ok. I wouldn't say no to either
the term immediately gelled usually refers to being compatible with another person. Getting used to can refer to other things, like rollercoasters
I met a new friend at the cafe. We immediately gelled (We had a good bond). I had my first ride on a boat. I thought i would be seasick, but I got used to it immediately.
I started plastering in my new job. I thought it would be hard and I would mess it up, but I got used to it immediately and it was fine.
The pilot fainted and I had to take over. I got used to the controls right away.
@charred hedge , sorry , but I'm no good at keeping friends or running hundreds of simultaneous DMs. Happy to chat here anytime
thank you very much, where are you from?
australia
wowwwwwwww
peo
how to understand
where to use which version of some phrase like
there are a multiple
of every single phrase
to say in another way
Probably the best phrases would be "In other words...", or "phrasing it another way..."
everything fits with our plan
this is all in line with our plan
which one is the best to use
A lot of times these sorts of choices are both ok. It depends on the context. What was just said before the statement to be used. both are ok on their own
both are ok structurally and message wise but the choice depends on context
thank you
š
it reminds me of something
can i say?
Are you burning the midnight oil? translate pleaseš¤£
you do better go home
how to say this one also
To burn the midnight oil is to be working late at night - https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/burn_the_midnight_oil
Is sigh and exhale the same thing?
They are physically the same thing, but a sign includes an emotional meaning
Ok. "It didn't used to be like this" this sentence I found, why it's didn't use"d" ? But not didn't use to be like this?
I've asked myself that for many years. I am use(d) to not knowing the answer š āāļø
hmm
you do better go home, it reminds me of something - these two right?
ok. I have had a think. "I am used to" is using the word "Used" as an adjective and follows the verb "To be". The adjective means "accustomed (to)". I am used, you are used, we are used, they are used [to] [Something]. When you are talking about being accustomerd to something and use this wording, it will always be "Used"
If you are talking about having utilized something in in the past then it will be I used to drive. Mut if you are fasmiliar with driving, then I am used to driving.
the presnt tense of this is of course I use my hammer. But also as I know how to use my hammer, I am also used to the feel of my hammer.
You are probably thinking of "You'd better go home" meaning, "You had better go home", or more directly "Go Home!"
yeah
) right on the spot!
thanks
you would better go home
i wanted to say this one thanks)
It is you 'd (you had) not you'd (you would)
Well off to JG class for some controversy.
what
you would do better go home
?
not right?
If you wish to say this then "You would do better to go home"
You'd can be a contraction of you had or you would. Most english speakers will say "you'd better go home." Or, "you should go home."
A semi colon is like taking a short breath rather than a pause if that makes sense.
- ādecade. Whileā as it appropriately uses a period to separate the units and follows the word āwhileā with the appropriate conjunction.
Here is a fun way to understand the difference. I hope this is helpful. Could/would have is like dreaming about what you could have done differently in the past. Itās like saying, āIf only I had made a different choice, things might have turned out better.ā
For example, if your friend missed a flight, you could say, āYou could have left earlier, and you would have caught the plane.ā
On the other hand, could/would have been is like imagining how things might have been different in the past. Itās like saying, āIf things had happened differently, the situation would be completely changed now.ā
For instance, if your favorite team lost a crucial match, you might say, āIf they had scored that goal, they would have been the champions.ā
Remember, ācould/would haveā focuses on the action itself, while ācould/would have beenā focuses on the situation or state resulting from that action.
Thanks, teacher. Please consider the problem and sample answer below.
The life spans of rockfish vary greatly by species. Forinstance, the colorful calico rockfish (Sebastes dalli) can survive for a little over a ______ the rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus) boasts a maximum life span of about two centuries. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A) decade: while B) decade. While C) decade; while D) decade, while
Choice D is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation between a main clause and a subordinate clause. This choice correctly uses a comma to mark the boundary between the main clause (āthe colorfulā¦decadeā) and the subordinate clause (āwhileā¦centuriesā) that provides contrasting information about the life span of rougheye rockfish.
Choice A is incorrect because a colon canāt be used in this way to join a main clause and a subordinate clause. Choice B is incorrect because it results in a rhetorically unacceptable sentence fragment beginning with āwhile.ā Choice C is incorrect because a semicolon canāt be used in this way to join a main clause and a subordinate clause.
Your answer is choice B).
And the sample answer is choice D).
didnt we already go through that question with you earlier?
Yeah, @forest solar . You chose the correct answer.
The teacher also answered to this problem and as you can see his answer is quite different.
So I just commented to teacher's answer.
probably because its early in the morning and Grant is answering questions while eating his cereal.
Yeah, maybe.
I am grateful for his devotion whether his answer is correct or not.
And Peo, you are in the late night, aren't you?
Thanks to you either.
Hello guys, does anyone know the difference between "pacify" and "mollify" ?
1200am
basically the same. pacify may be more commonly heard, given I've never heard the other word, but understand it as mollycoddle.
calm someone down
thank you
is there a difference between grumble and grouse?
i think they are the same
I think I've found the answer. grouse is informal.
oke
Unabated
How is it pronounced with or without the "ed" at the end
If you were to speak fluently
Can I ask you these kind of questions more often?
I pronounce it with the ed at the end
Damn, a lot
Yes, lemme think of an example
š
im having a linguistical crisis
I pronounce it with the "ed" at the end
yes
You would put the ed on if its past tense. What are you asking about?
Idk why
But I thought those kind of words were pronounced without the ed
If one was speaking fluently
Or rather with just a mild pronunciation
Depending on what s following
escalated is a word that has ed and is pronounced with ed. I have escalated the issue to management
pronounced with -e-d
I listended to a class with Nimi a week or so ago, and he was talking about words with no endings, but the thing is, as a native, I did pronounce almost every word in full nthat he said was cut short. Sure there are regions where they may sound like they are missing, but generally its not all slang spoken around the world. French is bad but English is no where near that.
I want to know what is soviet communism
Look up Marxism, Leninism
Before the perestroika Soviet era reforms of Gorbachev that promoted Eurocommunism, the majority of its history it went the formal ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) was MarxismāLeninism, a form of socialism consisting of a centralised command economy with a vanguardist one-party state that aimed to realize the dictatorsh...
@flat rune , Why did you become a public switched telephone network (PSTN)?

Public switched tƩlƩphone network ???
Can I help you with the question or did peo solved it ?
Basically yeah Soviet stands for the whereabout of Russian empire in the XX sec
Yes plz
Communism is the ideology culture and someone might argue economic regime foremost going on during that regime
So it is especially referring to the Leninism ideology and admittedly up to the stalinism
As peo said
Whereas marxism is a little bit more general
And influenced not only the Soviet Union but spread out much more broadly
And what is marxism
Marxism is the ideology coming up from Karl Marx, one of the most important philosophers of the history because of his influence over the world
Is a culture that s standing against the capitalism as a form of economic production based on an upper and a lower class
And which aimed at collectivising the productions means as a form of freedom and dignity
Hmmm I see
As good as it might seem, unfortunately no one has ever been able to realize it
I want to know what he means by this sentence :freedom was not only the recognition of necessity, it was the recognition of possibilty
Necessity vs possibly is one of the clear paths Christianism took over the paganism with
Endorsing the latter as its spiritual ideology
Can I say "Where do we stand?" to ask about a situation To enquire what is going on around us.
Hi
That sounds a bit weird. I would just say "what's going on?" Or, "What's happening?" Or, if the situation just occurred, "what just happened?"
OK, Thanks, but stand means something like to 'be in a state/situation, doesn't it?
Yes, but context is important. For example, I am talking to my friend and we're having a discussion about which is better, ketchup or mustard.
"I like ketchup better!"
"Well, I'm more of a mustard person myself. That's just where I stand!"
Stand can mean "to take a firm position," and "to tolerate." The change I would make to your original question is, "That's where we stand." That sounds like what a group of people would say when they all agree on something. Usually, if you use a pronoun + "stand" (I/We stand") it will not be phrased as a question, since you are stating your opinion on something. If you ask a question, you could say, "Where do you stand on this?" Or, "Where do you stand on the topic/issue?"
Bingo.
Also, "What's your stance on this/that?" Is common conversational English.
There are some good examples on this page: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stance and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stand#English
What about "I can't stand it" when you mean you can't handle something due to stress?
Good point, Jonok. That phrase is very common in English. Remember that, "I can't stand it!" Or, "I can barely/hardly stand it!" Are negative statements. For example: "I can't stand you!" Can be a brutal remark to make at someone.
I'm watching videos about daily conversation and make some sentence like "Sometimes when I doing my homework I drop off asleep" is it right?
It is a good practice to improve my English?
I understand the meaning, but I don't really hear "drop off" as slang for "fall asleep" in America. I would just say, "Sometimes when I am doing my homework I fall asleep." Or, "I fall asleep when I'm doing my homework sometimes." "Doze off," and "Nod off" are also common phrases that mean "falling asleep."
I understand, so can I use "drop off" for objects(I don't know)? " Can you drop us off on the entrace?"
Exactly. In American English that is very common.
"Amazon dropped our package off this morning, Mom."
"Hey Bob, can you drop the kids off at football practice?"
OOOOOH! I understand Ty ā¤ļø
if it's not a problem, could you give some tips to improve my english? I need to practice, mainly my listening, etc. But I have shame
Personally, I think that one of the best ways to learn a language is to inundate and immerse yourself with it. Surround yourself with English at all times, if you are serious about learning. Try to listen to only English music. Try to only watch shows/series and movies/films in English (when I am learning a new language, I watch movies/shows in that language and always take notes while I am watching). If you are a beginner, I recommend watching cartoons in English to start.
Thank you guys, God bless you ā¤ļø
ur wc
i have a question can anyone explain to me the deep meaning of this sentence :telling is not only a matter of retelling but also of foretelling
That sounds philosophical. I interpret that as: hindsight is 20/20; or, you can remember the past, but you can't know the future
Yes exactly philosophical and it bears a deep meaning
But for me I think he means the art of narrating is not only about telling explaining facts and revealing truths but it's about forshadowing anticipating what will happen in the future
should i put "s" in verb when i use does ?
No because u already conjugate the verb does so the verb it follows should be in infinitive
I need someone who can help me with a 'sentence'. š
Does this make sense to anyone? "Insidious dejection"
That would be a very uncommon choice of words. Of course, you could say "It is an insidious dejection." What you said by itself doesn't make much since without other words around it.
Oh. Well, if it's a title of a song, yeah.
Why do people say like this: You get that battery yet? You find anything yet? Instead of: Did you get that battery yet/ Did you find anything yet?
it's informal, so the grammar can be loose
Where do we stand, is asking, what is our place in a current event. Are we for it against a particular side, or proposal. This might be used in world politics... Are we with one dude or the other, or it might need in the office, do we want a project to go ahead or not. It also is used to ask, what is our status or progress currently. Eg; "Where do we stand with this project? We are stalled in development." And yes that includes what's going on, basically.
You could use the word "nod off". That's uk/aus/nz for doze or fall asleep
Crash out
Just the natural evolution of spoken language. "Did you" became "d'you" became "djew" became "you." Eventually written language followed.
Make sentences pls
hi !! I just wanted to ask which sentence is the most correct : "Which type of house would you consider building ? " or "Which type of house would you consider to build ?" ?
the first one. it's rare to have 'consider' followed by an infinitive
thanks !!
All are common.
thank you!
Hello can anyone explain me too the deep meaning of this senetence :the true american, whatever else he is ,is also somehow Black.
Your question makes no sense
Goodmorning
He added that Indonesia had contributed ācrucial evidenceā to the UK investigation into Arbus
Is this phrase correct ?
I guess yes that s the current vocab
Why just B2 tho, if I can use it, in the form of to contribute something to something, on the opposite of to contribute to something, outside of its financial meanings, I'd say it is at least C1
What's a crap?
Crap is synonym for āSh!tā except its not really considered as a strong swear word in comparison
wich one is better university
Oxford or cambridge ?
Hello!
Is it more common to say "what are you doing today" or "what are you going to do today" When you want to know someone's schedule?
If you crushed into them you re coming up with what you doing today
If you let's say are texting them going after a important event or something you re going with what are you going to do today
Oh! Thank you, I've noticed that instead of using future tense in english we can use present participles or continuous tense, is that right? why is that?
do you use the word 'brusque'
Because the future tense abide to a strict rule of unpredictability, whereas is if you were saying I'm going to do something you re basically implying you are already quite sure this is very likely to be happening
i have seeen it being used in books and articles multiple times
i havent heard it in conversations too much, but maybe i just did not pay attention to it, i dont know, i know i saw it being used in written forms
thanks
I hate it when Cambridge dictionary is not working
The site is under maintenance or something again
DidYou wanna grab lunch after this?AreYou sure you want that?AreYou John?DidYou pack for the trip already?
"Are" can be dropped, too. Sentences 2 & 3 show that.
@real carbon
"Hey guys, if someone have the time, could you correct my text if its in the correct tense? I'm learing for a test and i have to know what is right and whats false.
In 1825, there was still no insurance coverage available for items that were not fixed. This business gap was filled by the Swiss Mobiliar insurance company. This was an exceptional time because you could pay your premiums in kind, like vegetables or eggs. In the year 1861, following the devastating fire of Glarus, Mobiliar was compelled to pay a significant sum. After this event, everyone knew how important Mobiliar was. Today, Mobiliar has headquarters in Bern, Nyon, and Zurich. This is because the insurance company must separate life from non-life. I could provide a considerable amount of information about it. However, it would exceed the scope of this article. Life is in Nyon, non-life is in Bern. We also have about 80 head offices and as many branches. Abroad, we have no branches, but we have international partners who support us in other countries. In Switzerland, we have about 5,860 employees, and last year, we had sales of 4.5 billion.
Here, at the headquarters in Herisau, we have three departments. Thereās the claims department, where Iāll be in my third year of apprenticeship. There are also the consultants and sales support, where Iāll be for the next two years. So, itās all according to the plan. But before the last summer vacations, numerous people quit, six in total. This doesnāt sound like a lot, but since all came from the same department, for us, it was a lot. Among those people was the person who would have been in charge of me. Now, the head of sales support is teaching me, but he has a lot to do, and so everyone thinks he can assign me tasks. So it never gets boring."
Here's an alternative version created by chatgpt;
"In 1825, insurance coverage was not yet available for non-fixed items. This market niche was addressed by the Swiss Mobiliar insurance company. What made this era unique was that premiums could be paid in kind, using items like vegetables or eggs. In 1861, after the catastrophic fire of Glarus, Mobiliar faced significant payouts. This incident underscored the company's importance to many. Today, Mobiliar's primary offices are located in Bern, Nyon, and Zurich. This division is essential to segregate life insurance from non-life insurance. While I could delve deeper into this topic, it would go beyond the scope of this article. Life insurance is managed in Nyon, while non-life insurance is overseen in Bern. Additionally, we operate around 80 main offices with numerous branches. Internationally, while we don't have branches, we partner with international firms to expand our services. In Switzerland, we employ approximately 5,860 individuals, and last year, our revenue reached 4.5 billion.
At our Herisau headquarters, there are three main departments. I'm currently in my third year of apprenticeship in the claims department. I'll spend the subsequent two years with the consultants and sales support teams. Everything is progressing as planned. However, just before the last summer vacation, we experienced a noticeable staff turnover ā six individuals left. While this might not seem significant, it was noteworthy for us since all of them were from the same department. Among those who left was the individual designated to supervise me. Now, the head of sales support is guiding me. Given his responsibilities, many assume they can delegate tasks to me, ensuring there's always something to keep me occupied."
So borne and born are pronounced the same right
Oxford is ranked higher.
At our house, and at work we say... What are you doing today, but usually only in the morning as it's not really any good later in the day.
Usually asking what's happening now, but the person generally volunteers what they will be doing later, as that is just because now is boring 
I've heard it used a handful of times over the past many decades, if that's an indication.
Oxford dictionary on the shelf is always waiting for your viewing pleasure.
3 you john. Me Tarzan
Troll
What is the rule fur using hyphens and when not to? How would one know if a compound word should be open, closed, or hyphenated?
How could I use ālikeā and āasā? Ex: āI work as a freelancer of frontendā
Give me some examples
Because sometimes I forget the rules
I am looking like a
I work as a
Work them out by mirroring the examples you can find on the web
If you d like, it s fine.
This link is helpful - https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphens.asp
I ll be updating the discussion forums with short paragraphs wrote by my own, don't make a fuss on striking out whatever you feel like being possibly scratched better up off
Trying to write as it comes out of my pen
Is it that wrong ?
I know it is just be honest so I ll make up my mind and start from the scratch again writing as god is looking me after up for. After. Up. For.

You want to be corrected?
"Trying to write as it comes out of my pen" Makes sense, sounds literary.
Sounds poetic
Could anyone help a little? I have two questions. 1 What the difference between point at sb/sth and point to sb/sth 2 What does solid actually mean here - solid amount of evidence? is it a lot or it's reliable?
But for that I meant
If possible
š
With to point at you re most probably physically waving the finger against someone, or actively pursuing something you might be straining to reach
Point to can be phrased in a lot of ways
1 - First, sb/sth are words that I never hear or see as a native english speaker. I know that sb = somebody and sth = something. Here are some examples:
"Where is the red dot on the screen?"
"Right here! I'm pointing at it!
"Could you point me to the nearest pharmacy?"
"Point at" usually implies it is closer to the speaker, "point to" usually implies it is farther from the speaker. In conversations, "point at" usually means you are using your finger to point.
2 - Yes, "solid" can also mean "substantial," or "good,"
Yes, Elise, listen to noobdude I just tried
Thanks! I use Sb/Sth a lot. It's maybe incorrect but it makes everything easier. Sometimes I use Sb/S because S even shorter. (I use it in descriptions of new words)
*"Is that wrong?"
*"I know it is, just be honest and I'll make up my mind and start from scratch again. Writing as god is looking after me after
Always say "from scratch" and never "from the scratch"
What about this text
Is it wrong
I didn't want to post it here. I just wanted a proofreading of that XD
Thank you by the way, already been so much helpful š
Thx man. Ur really good at explaining stuff
Thanks, happy to help!
When you say "discussion forums" do you mean this channel (#šļ½english-questions )?
I think you meant to say "on my own," or "short paragraphs written by myself," or "short paragraphs I wrote."
"don't make a fuss" sounds like something an old person would say. I would just say, "don't hesitate to correct me."
No I m about to post it in another server ā
Okay, I see now
ā I see. Got it. Thank youšš
I m proud the second part of the text came out to be correct
"Striking out whatever you feel like being possibly scratched better up off" just came out of my nerve didn't copy it by anyone.
@forest solar where s my fluent role. I deserve it
you can take it yourself
Don't ruin the party
The tense sounds a bit weird. "Striking out" can mean "correct/change my mistakes" but since you are asking others you would use imperfect tense, "don't hesitate to correct me, you can strike out any mistakes you feel like would be better scratched off."
In general, "scratch off" and "strike out" as a phrase/colloquialism for "to change/alter/delete" has specific usage. For me, I only say that to my professors when they are grading an essay/paper of mine. Most english speakers may be confused if you use that phrase in conversation. I would just say "please make any changes you see fit" or "please do not hesitate to correct my English"
Perfect š
Read books in English is so good!
What kind of book would You recommend?
April in Moscow LOL, I'm "beginner" so I'm reading books of penguin readers
Unusual book, i would say. š
But keep it on, mate!
I recommand The Curious Incident of The Dog in The Night Time, I read it at school and it was fun and easy, it is still one of my favorite book if you want š
Hello. What's "Plain and simple" mean?
Very good James. But I'm not reading your chatbot
I've a question, when do we use "Toward and Towards"
It's not for you
It's for the person with the query
now who's the troll?
Could I say āGive me some minutes?ā
Or āGive me a few minutes?ā
ā but im putting as much time as i want to into itā
Is this grammatically correct
I guess it's quiet common to say put "liquid" into Sth. Does it sound natural? Why? Is the word "pour" bad or something?
???
You definitely can say "Can you spare a minute?" or "Do you have a minute?"
maybe give works too but it surely won't be very polite
can someone recommend me a2, b1 level books?
I can't. But you can start reading books for children. Much bigger vocabulary and much better narration, unless you need only grammar of course.
that's a good idea! thank you!
NP. I'm reading them on my elementary + (But I'm reading elementary books as well.)
good luck!
this is going to be a pretty difficult recommendation but i would go with "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle"
which is, hard to estimate, it has a ton of everyday vocabulary, but also some rare words related to philosophy or politics
also is very lengthy, so, maybe id say it is like B1+ at least most of the time, in certain parts it goes to B2-C1, if there is some philosophy in that particular part
the reason why am talking about this one is because it is very much grounded in reality and everyday life, the actions which happen are limited to everyday contexts like shops, parks, home, garden, basic things, but the author (Haruki Murakami) is also famous for using very complex stuff with this, so, id say he mixed both easy things with very difficult things
...but i probably won't have anything better, since the books am reading are all targeted towards natives and often include difficult ideas and points, so
Really but what's ur name in the book
What does "as well" mean?
I ve beend there too/ as well. Same meaning
Idk, but probably put sound a little bit more imperative
While you use pour it when you want to make sure the other person is clearly understanding what he has been said
I m shooting here I don't really know
Probably the "to" is too much here, is overdoing it. Just remove it, change "intoā in āin" for the purpose of making it sound a little bit more fluent, add a little bit of salt and here you are you done it
I m putting in it as much time as I want
šÆ
"as well" = also/too
Could you say the sentence you are asking about?
I think you meant to say, "I'm taking a shot in the dark"
ā ā„ļø
Hi guys/gals, what self-study books do you suggest me as an intermediate English learner?
for grammar, vocabulary, proverbs, idioms.
Which tense is suitable for this sentence and why? Are these both correct?
I'm studying Economics
I have been studying Economics
The sentence below emphasizes duration than above
What about the above sentence?
Sorry to say but You clearly misunderstood the question
how do you ask someone to charge your phone with their charger?
How do I distinguish between those?
I have a question about the tense I'm supposed to use in this sentence "He said he wants to " or "He said he wanted to", present simple or past simple?
Technically, the second one is correct. However the first one is considered correct now as it's used in spoken English. In formal English however, avoid using the first one
this looks like a good example I will investigate immediately! thanks
Something like 'put coffee into the mug' or 'put wine into the glass'
I guess he didn't both are suitable the meaning is changing
I will pay on Monday, don't worry
I can t, I m busy since on Monday, I ll be paying the toll
Both are correct it depends on the meaning
What difference about it
I will be paying > focus more on YOU in the tense, what YOU will be doing at that time
can I say ' somebody play at full strength ' and 'somebody play below strength?'
Somebody plays*
It's correct and understandable but doesn't sound good
Below strength tho just sounds very bad
Not at their best
Reining themselves in going full out
Can I say something like - OK, mate, I'll stick around to the lunchtime. First of all the question is about the preposition 'to'. Can I wait or do something to something that is a time period in general- to the evening, to next Saturday etc?
Didn't get it
I'll stick around for an hour (now is 11 o'clock) or I'll be waiting until 12. the same Idea but with to + noun
Can I use shall with I and we in affirmative form?
For example, I shall help you if you like.
It's better to use will for the simple future unless you are an official or something.
Kay
It's very formal or old fashioned
Yes
You can, it's correct
Infact, you can also say up to the dinner, but just to it's working as well
You have come to the right place.
Sounds very formal, didn't find anything about that in Cambridge dictionary tho
Maybe you wanted to say I m being consistent with the opinion of the others?
Or I m validating it with other opinions on the merit. Or with other opinions stating the same
What are the other ways to say: I made an error
I misbehaved / my fault / my bad / it s on my charge that...
I donāt understand about the willingness part
How do I use that.
Wdym?
I don't really know why people get to study this kind of s
You can get along with that use and meaning of will just mirroring it, in case you wouldn't get to access that vocab when you re gonna need it. Which already is tough to think, afterwards, once you tap into that use, you ll naturally absorb it as you did with the to be verb
Where are you from. I guess you do express you wether being leaning for doing something or not in the same way in your natural language.
If you don't want to do something, you simply go saying I won't do it.
By the way, kinda of side note due here, I remember "I ll see into it" is used as a formal way to say you'll take care of something. So it helps to have fixed that use of will as implying willingness when you come across these more advance expressions
You can be "willing" when you offer yourself to do a thing voluntarily
You offer yourself to bring out the trash every week, you are willing to do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOwMxmbwIQY
please watch this video
A Flight??
why do you share it to here
i liked the plot twist at the end, and the character development was also peak
How its going? İ want help , how can i read "brave" i cant read THİS (its hard for my language mouth)
Hi guys/gals, what self-study books do you suggest me as an intermediate English learner?
for grammar, vocabulary, proverbs, idioms.
idk books but I have a list for improving my english
links application
do u want it?
you're welcome 
Wow thank you for sharing it here!
My bad ,my mistake , i was mistaken sorry I'm wrong as well as ducky Lucky said
doesn't matter < 3
thx
Wc !
It depends on what you want to say
I write a paragraph and I say '' I usually spend time w my fam'' but used it once again
What s the level of these resources if may I ask?
there are many apps and links so you can adjust the level according to your level
Hang around
I often get dilly dally around my fam (I guess that's the correct way to use it, not sure tho)
Linger/tarry
Fool around
I m often abiding in alongside my family
these were very good suggestions thannk youu 
I, see. You can use less fancy words like stay or just be. Or you can say what exactly you are doing there, for example "lie around" But I'm sorry I don't know exact synonym
@lime vigil Actually I know one. "pass time". May be it is pretty close
I'll look thankss
hmm how can I use this
I usually pass time w my fam is this right
I'm not sure if it sounds very nice, because, you know, I just want to ask you - and what do you do there )) but maybe it is what you wanted to communicate
Or, are you pleased with that? and so on
You said seas and i didn't understood drops.
oh... What is w and fam? @lime vigil
with my family
Yeah, pass time is alright then
I thought of something different
okeyy thank you very much I will use this words
just in case. You need a subject with verb pass in** this meaning**. pass (the) time, pass an hour, pass a week and so on. You can't leave pass alone.
okay okay ı got it thank uu
What about "entertaining myself"
hello who knows a site or link where i can read and download books for free
Guys, what is the difference between "end up and end up with"?
Hello, guys. Which one is correct? "...'d chosen different color" or "...'d chosen another color"
Greetings, dear participants of the server!
Is there any sort of premade "fluency roadmap" with all the stuff any advanced learner with a solid foundation must cover to ultimately reach the level of their dream?
I think both are correct. It'll depends of context.
You can use either āchosen a different colorā or āchosen another colorā
Without context, I would say that āend upā implies movement of some kind. āWhere did you end up?ā Or āWhere did you end up going?ā The other āend up withā, implies some choice was made. āWhich one did you end up with?ā Meaning āwhich did you chooseā.
Thank you
Consolidate was always used by my teachers to refer to information, and in your case opinions. Consolidate means to bring together the key facts from your information and link then together, so you have a better picture of how it all fits together. By doing this you will remember it easier and understand it as a whole rather than just little pieces of random data.
I'll look into it (determine a cause or reason)
Or, I'll see to it. (Ensure it is actioned or done)
I pass the time by ...
I enjoy being with
I enjoy (activity)
I whittle away the hours (activity)
It's a surprise for the dedicated cataloger, or diligent student.
Dilly dally is a derogatory term used by the elderly to a person that is lazing about. One would not use it about themself. Same for fooling about. Abide is old language. Don't use in conversation about yourself. Only old stories or if you are Peo. Hang around is good.
@lime vigil
Spend time with the family is most common.
oh okay its great suggestions
thank youš¤
collocations are my weak spot. @lime vigil Sorry.
Hello, whatās different between Iām leaving and Iām going to leave?
Right!
Also what difference between going and about?
going to is more about predictions connected with something that you perceive. may be something bad... usually. "About" is more about neutral facts. look! The car is going to hit that tree. The the tree is about to fall. if you use going to to show arrangement or something like that... so that meant you decided - I'm going to cut the tree. About means It will happen soon for sure.
ing and going to work the same... I'm not expert, not at all, so you should wait for someone else to answer too.
EDIT. the same if you don't mean that you are leaving right then at the moment of speech... of course. If you do, there is a difference. )
Will you be coming formally than are you going to come?
Maybe he rather wanted to say: "what I m providing adds together / adds up with other opinions as well"
Tho I'm not sure which of em is the correct one
A bit late but...
@sweet yew
....
Is this correct?
āThe Communication Network of Womenās NGOā
i think so
what's the name of this equipment
spanner
or wrench in American English
Spanner in British English
@crystal urchin ... no I'm wrong. I've seen the word wrench in British too. Once...
np broš
My favorite animal is a cat or the cat?
can "stop off during the journey" and "break the journey" be considered the same
yep
a or the... can be both actually
I'm leaving basically means right now. Im going to leave can be heard sometimes for right now, but generally it's a feeling of little bit later, could be minutes or longer.
That is also what i was trying to say. Opinions are just another source of information.
cohesively, ``` the word **cohesively** is describing which word in the sentence?
I feel sad that you didn't get your answer, but i also have no idea.
Topics
Shifting spanner, to be more descriptive.. had the worm screw size adjust. Oh and adjustable wrench in usa.
š
I don't think Italian has a word for that. That s awesome
thank you, I have another question, all I can see is they are describing a word, but I do not know which word is it, how can I improve so I can notice which word is it?
Pick up the main sentence you re watching in
All these topics are presented cohesively
The adjective is referring to the subject
strumento che fa rimuovere i dadi 
Pffff
š
Just strumento for tool looks so bad
Hand me my strumento che fa rimuovere i dadi
Pousso avere mi strumento che fa rimuovere i dadi
Oh wait got it now. It's called chiave inglese regolabile (regolabile stands for shifting)
Didn't think about that. Well I m about to have my citizenship taken up
Pousso avere mi strumento regiabile che fa rimuovere i dadi
Not strumento "chiave inglese" that s how is called
So we call it "English key"
If you were to translate it literally
XD
Hardly a 'key' but...
That s it, chiave inglese! Cus it refers to the fact that it's matching with something, that s why key I suppose
Don't know what it is, but it's from England and looks like and allen key
Hand me over my shifting wrench! Sounds like you were about to add "bitch"...I don't know why
the tricky part to me is cohesively is an adverb, so I try to search for verbs because adverb modify verbs in my understanding, so I ignore nouns like topics
@forest solar hey!!!
š
Yes?
You re right. I m sorry
But yeah same rationale it just becomes clearer when you are used to the meaning of the words I guess
Hey just to prove the depth of English slang
So I know there are different slangs for different regions I suppose ? But I guess there are also multiple slangs for the same region, that s crazy to think
For example , to vomit. I found his slang in the dictionary as to barf
But I also heard to boke
And now I am seeing to honk
To puke
Fair enough if you re not regularly consulting a dictionary you are never going to be able to understand English as it is spoken in movies or such. Cus you thought you know how to say something which might even be niche, turn out you just know 1/10 of it
And the next thing you know you didn't get a word of what you re watching at. š
There was an exchange of blows. Is this sentence more colloquial than one might expect?
If yes, I suppose I can't say for example "there were shootings" as "there was an exchange of shootings", cus it looks like much more informal than the previous one, right
A good source for slang
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=urbandictionary
A place for you to lie about the amount of sexual knowledge/experience you have.
Shots were exchanged.
Sexual???
hi
How do you simplify present perfect with past simple, like Americans always do?
I'm sorry but I dont get what you mean, can you say it a different way?@acoustic geyser
British use Present Perfect more than Americans and vice versa.
I believe it just comes down to how different they speak and teach their language @acoustic geyser
It's better to learn just one way of speaking english rather then trying to learn American English and British English.
Each version is correct the americans by the looks of it just dont use "Have" or "Has" in that example
However
That example cannot speak for all america but I am assuming a majority would follow that way of speaking
Again it's just the way they were influenced when hearing people speak
OOH WAIT
I'm sorry I think I misunderstood your question
It's simply just how they choose to say it
You should always use the past tense when talking about something that already happened
But in some situations if your comfortable and know its correct you can use present
Like "he has gone to bed" or "he had gone to bed"
Same thing nothing wrong
very true, but anyway you need to know the second. I'm learning British, but half of my books in American. maybe even more... but in literature Americans don't often use the simple past instead of perfect... or I don't read enough or my books are low lvl
oh... I think this is all the same. The tenses are the same, but Americans in speech are often use The Simple Past instead of the Perfect.
I can understand them, there is not always something hiding behind what you say.
Especially behind routine or chores. But I don't like it.
Yes, adverbs can be a bit tricky. I was just talking with someone about this yesterday. And the simple answer is that the adverb can be used to modify a verb, an adjective or even the whole sentence.
can anyone help me please? the word Crowd (Noun). Why do I often meet it used with animals or even things? In my dictionaries this word is about people only.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peIAjPBwlZs from second minute. American English obviously
In this video, learn the difference between the Past Simple and the Present Perfect. We'll study these two English verbs tenses and compare sentences using both.
You'll understand how these two verb tenses are used in a natural context by native English speakers.
And you'll feel confident adding these two verb tenses to your vocabulary.
Pl...
Could you give an example of what you mean when you see it used with animals and things?
It all depends on the context it is being used in
there are always a lot of birds up on the mountains and near the farm building in autumn, but not these crowds of thousands and thousands of them
https://media-prod.fangoria.com/images/The_Birds_2.original.jpg
I'm guessing what is meant in that sentence, is that they're using the word crowd to refer to the large group of crows
Though that's incorrect
As it's a murder or crows I believe when referencing a large amount of them
You can still use crowd when referring to animals and things
You'll be understood
I think in that context it is referring to the large number all in one place. It isnāt just a murder of crows, but rather something more alarming because they are crowded together.
Hello can anyone explain to me this concept:repression of women
Do you mean āoppression of womenā which refers to social forces acting upon a group or ārepresssionā the use of force to subdue an individual or the practice of avoiding certain thoughts or feelings which is a more psychologically related term?
Another dumb question of mine, I think. What should I say?
"I want to know what the best books are"
or
"I want to know what are the best books"
I'm kinda puzzled by this kind of phrasing; I would be super glad if someone could answer this.
first one is correct, second one follows inversion which is used when you ask a question
"What are the best books?" is a question, for example, but "I want to know what the best books are" is not really a question anymore
like ofc you are asking about something, implicitly, i would say, but this is not really a question in terms of grammar
I see. Thanks for the help.
@mortal citrus share your view too lol, u stopped typing
i was just gonna say āthe first one is correct and the second sentence sounds unnaturalā
And also i was gonna talk about an article that talked about indirect question order
but then i stopped bc im lazy
okay sounds very kangaraussian
LOL
fenti guess what
if i fail at everything am doing in my life so far then at this point i maybe would just like to teach english in future, imagine that, although am not a kangaroo unlike you
so am not a native, which means my intuition is not as good, you kangarauusies have sixth sense for kangarrusian english
Omg yes teach english
LMFAO
True
it would be hilarious tbh, if i just, suddenly messed up something very basic and still worked as a teacher, id just die of shame lmfao
That happens
But not often
if it happens often then ur a shit tescher!
yes, am a sh#t teacher, so i teach sh#t
Oh my
sup, i have a question
can someone tell me the difference between "must", "might" and "shall"? in my native language they have almost the same meaning, so i CAN read them, but i cant put them in a phrase. so this is my question, how do i use those words?
Not sure But 'must' means [Something that's Necessary/Compulsory to do] , might [Maybe] and Shall [Willing to do] .
I must go to bed, I am not feeling well. I might go out tomorrow, if I am feeling better. Certainly, I shall be able to visit you next week.
Yes!
Lots of animals have strange sounding words used to represent a bunch of them. These are called collective nouns. This site lists a 'bunch' of them. You will truly be an expert speaker if you remember all of them.
Guys ehat is the difference if i say
"i slept for 2 hours"
"i was sleeping for 2 hours"
"i have been sleeping for 2 hours"
-
"I slept for 2 hours."
#Simple past tense.
Indicates that at some point in the past, you slept continuously for a duration of 2 hours. It means that the sleeping occurred and is now completed, or you woke up completely. -
"I was sleeping for 2 hours."
#Past continuous tense.
Means that in the past, you were in the state of sleeping for a continuous duration of 2 hours. It emphasizes the ongoing nature of the action.
(( to me: this Sentence feels like an unfinished sentence! Needed to be followed by an action! For example:
I was sleeping for 2 hours before I decide to get up and finally eat something. )) -
"I have been sleeping for 2 hours."
This sentence is in the present perfect continuous tense. It suggests that you started sleeping in the past and are still sleeping at the time of speaking. It emphasizes the duration of the ongoing action from the past until now.
Overall, the difference lies in the tense and the aspect used in each sentence, which affects how the action is portrayed in relation to the past and present.
'shall' is used in statements/procedures that are mandatory.
'Should' is a word that does not mandate the instruction.
I thought i cannot use "simple with duration of time"
but you can. Maybe you are thinking of something else
I just wanted to say that "i slept for 2 hours today"
and you have done that just now. Its perfect.
All three are fine. All three could be interpreted the same way, and could also be interpreted differently. It just depend on the context. What are you talking about just before saying that and just after saying it. That can set the scene. You could be talking about what you did after class yesterday, or someone sees you walking out of your bedroom, and you say these. It will be understood in the context.
What about if someone sees me walking out of the room
If I saw you walking out of a room and you immediately said "I slept for 2 hours today", I would probably be puzzled why you said it. If you walked out of a room and immediately said " I've just slept for 2 hours", I would probably think, maybe you had been sleeping in the room, and probably believe you just woke up.
Hmm. A bit confused
in what part?
Like the difference, it is similar
2 part makes me more confused
I slept: Simple Past I was in bed in the past. There is no indication of when, except that it was earlier in time. You can add a description of the point in time to make it clearer when it happened.
I slept yesterday. I slept 2 hours ago. I slept last year. Its a single point in time.
I was sleeping: Past Continuous Tense. You were in bed sometime in the past (Same as before). The difference is that it gives the listener the understanding that the moment you are talking about was a period of time. You slept from time A until Time B. However it does not mention the start and end time. Only that it was a period of time. You could add those start and end times to make it clear to the listener.
I was sleeping from 6pm until 8pm, then I woke up and watched TV. I was sleeping until the doorbell woke me up (no start time because not important. Only end time as that is the important part of the message). When the delivery man arrived, I was sleeping. ( A point in the middle of my sleep. I was already asleep when he came, and I may have been sleeping after he left)
@smoky steppe
Wow, let me check, thx in advance!
could anyone help me?
Is the sentence "I was figuring on singing at the party" wrong?
'cuz I used an online spellchecker and it said it's grammatically wrong
Okie, thx, what about "ive jusr slept for 2 hours" sorry for bothering you
That would mean you just woke up now, or around about now, and you were sleeping for 2 hours up until now.
Got it thx!
I have a fever for 2 days now
Is this correct?
It is better to say, "I have had a fever for 2 days now". Or you can just say "I have a fever"
how bad is the f word?
Hi Peo?
Depends on how you use it. Most of the time in colloquial (casual) English it's not a big deal to say but in a professional or formal setting using it can be insulting and offensive especially if directed towards someone.
The beauty of it is that it can be used in almost any way.
I was trying to find a good diagram for you but they were all low quality.
it is very good
you might even say, it is f||rea||king good
some day and one day is the same thing?
can anyone please explain to me why the sentence: āMany people have been immigrating to the USA since 1776.ā is grammatically incorrect
if it even is incorrect
I wouldn't say it's incorrect tbh, but perhaps someone said it was because 'many' is used here
Again, wouldn't necessarily mark it as a such, but perhaps because past simple is used as opposed to present perfect
"some day" refers to an unspecified day in the future. It implies that something will happen or be accomplished at an unknown or uncertain time. For example, "I hope to visit Paris some day."
On the other hand, "one day" also refers to a future time, but it suggests a specific day or a particular moment in time. It implies that something will happen or be achieved at a specific point in the future. For example, "One day, I will become a successful entrepreneur."
yeah the correct version is: dave has had a makeover recently
but both feels right
š
To me they both sound fine, yeah, but you just gotta know present perfect is usually used with 'recently' to refer to recently completed actions
okay thank you :)
someone say this sentence to me ''bc ur a bit slow''
What does it mean?
What's up everybody?
They were insulting you but it's not a serious insult. They are pretty much saying 'you are not smart'. Normally this isn't used in a genuinely aggressive manner and is more joking around or not serious.
Yes it would be incorrect, it doesn't really sound normal. What would be correct could be something like 'I was thinking about singing at the party'.
humm
And what is bc?
Ah, bc is a text abbreviation meaning "because".
And slow is what is referring to you not being smart
"Slow" doesn't actually mean that but in conversational English especially with the younger generation that's what it means.
i dont like this kind of chating

How do you mean?
Like you want me to use easier words?
no
other people i meant
Oh that they were being mean?
they use some words like (idk,btw,etc..) in the social media and its hard to get it
Ah yeah, I understand.
I see how it can be hard to translate especially when learning a language.
Always feel free to ask people here though, and you can always look it up.
You're doing great though!
Okay
Thanks for sharing your .....
I have no idea what i should say at this moment
Haha, no worries. I'm always happy to help.
Btw = by the way
Idk = i dunno
Wth = what the hell
Cuz = because
Duh = expression to express that someone already knows.something
Prob the most common ones
And then lol can be sarcastic
Hello I want to know what is purgatory in christianity this question not for english and I'm curious about that word
And what means spirit-lore in english
Well
Purgatory
It's a place where people are stuck between living and dead
They cant enter heaven
But they arent also dead technically
It's hard to describe
Spirit lore
I'll have to look it up to get s good understanding
What I found is that Spirit-lore is something to guide a spirit to the afterlife
Yes in simple terms it is
Ohh I see
But it isnt a nice place
No problem
Even as someone who is christian it's difficult
Yes unless your deeply devoted
Ohh I see thank you again
by prayer, the spirits which have been closed in purgatory can be made to enter heaven sooner than they normally would
i mean, alive believers are supposed to pray so that those spirits can enter sooner, this way
the reason they entered purgatory, and not immediately the heaven, is because their souls were not pure enough, so to erase the sin, they must wait, and to make this process quicker, their relatives should pray for god's forgiveness so that they can be forgiven and allowed to enter
well, at least that's what i recall from times when i used to be a catholic, now am not so can be a bit off
OK what about the difference btw orthodox christian and roman catholic and protestant š¤
Ty by the way
And this concept includes only catholics or christians and orthodox ???
ive no idea, i was talking about catholicism
other ones havent ever been poisoning my mind
OK I see
what does freaking out mean? on google it says "to lose emotional control from extreme excitement" but i thought it only means "to become extremely panicked"
Yeah as far as I know to freak out means to be afraid
Be scared also
I'm a native speaker and I'm preparing for PSAT testing, are there any strategies that I can use to get more right? In math I'm able to easily get everything right but I always seem to get one or two wrong in english
It can be both, depending on the context. For example, if you're freaking out about a test you have, it would be the latter (to become extremely panicked), but if you're freaking out because you did well on a test, it would be the former (to lose emotional control from extreme excitement)
oh i didnt know that, i usually heard people use it with the meaning of panicked, didnt know it could be used for positive meaning too
thanks for the explanation!
No problem!
Could someone explain me about the differences between license and licence?
Licence is a noun and license is a verb. In the US, it's only spelled license for both noun and verb.
š tysm
Is there a particular reason you are seeking a perfect score on PSAT. My inclination is to recommend that you donāt worry about it. You will do fine.
National Merit
I seriously do not want to pay for college
Fair argument. Do you use some kind of study guide for PSAT? Sorry I took that exam about a hundred years ago (I mean I am exaggerating a little) and I really donāt remember what sort of questions it has. I hope you find your answers. College is too expensive and student loans suck.
There are official practice tests for it that have been quite helpful. Other than that, I've asked my AP Language teacher for tips and she's given a couple very helpful ones, I'm just trying to get all I can for it.
hello
is there any difference between to faint and to pass out?
They are the same concept
The same, pass out sounds more natural
I wish you good luck, it sounds like you have been working hard so I hope you can achieve your goal.
Thank you š
is to faint considered more formal?
I would say so
Oh that is a question for me? In Australia it's used by a lot of people in general conversation. It does sound bad, but if one hits their toe on a post, they say fk. If they don't like a politician they call him a fkn bum. If they are just mad, they say fkn fk. Probably not used around the office in general work meetings, but one worker might be angry at the boss and refer to them as a fkn nob, or similar. It's probably the higher end of rude, but wont shock people if it's heard. The 'c' word is treated worse and would shock people a bit if used. 'bloody' is a milder word inserted into general conversation a lot more and it's typical street Australian. Same usage as f, but milder. If one is really mad they may say bloody bloody. If you are having tea with the king, you don't use any of these. If you are with your mother you don't either (maybe occasionally) if you are talking about something controversial, like a politician.
(Ps. I just yelled out fk, because my computer screen locked while typing this and i have to type a password in to unlock. That's typical usage.) I also yell it out every 15 seconds when typing on my phone keyboard.
Hope that helps. Not used in usa as much. Probably a little less in uk but i hear 'f' a lot on uk tv shows as well.
You and your eternal fight with your phone keyboard
Oh the usa are so conservative and censored they think the word is frack, because their parents were to scared to say it correctly and they learned the kiddy weird from tv and it's it from generation to generation. 
One emigrates to, and immigrates from, when they migrate.
Many people have emigrated to the usa since 1776
From where they migrate*
It is an insult. It says your brain is not running at the same speed as others. Meaning you are not intelligent.
ā ļø
A lot of slang and even internet abbreviation and rude words can be found in
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=urbandictionary
A place for you to lie about the amount of sexual knowledge/experience you have.
The belief is, you were not perfect on earth, even if you are mean to go to heaven. So you sit in purgatory for a period of time . The more bad you are on earth the longer you wait in purgatory. People on earth are supposed to pray for the dead to help them get to heaven quicker. If you are on earth and do things bad, the church used to issue 'indulgences' to those who do something good. For example if you said prayer xxx then it was written you could get ?# of indulgences to be used as credits to cancel some your sins or get out of purgatory faster.
Unfortunately institutionalized religion is built on thousands of years of stupid answers to questions that are written down and made law and become further from the basic truth of be good to people and god.
The nuns taught me that
For a lack of an answer the Roman Church and the Orthodox churches followed two different disciples of Jesus and they basically diverged over the centuries. That happened in the first few hundred years after Jesus. The protestants was a movement in Germany that broke away from the final Catholic Church in about 600ish years ago and was started my the writings of Martin Luther. It has a lot to do with marriage.
Additionally the Anglican Church was founded by king Henry VIII when he had a fight with the Pope about divorcing his wives. (Superficial history, with bad facts and dates, but wiki will give you a better detail if you wish to look)
Not sure who you have been talking to in the USA but some people use the word f*&k like it is a legal requirement. We wouldnāt use it in a business setting, if we wanted to keep our jobs. But people often use the word Fāk, motherfāker, or some other creative variation. IIt is used as a noun, a verb, an adjective. The use of this word goes across social strata and is quite prolific. People will use the word frack, frick, fudge, or freak as a substitute when they feel it is improper to ādrop the f-bombā like when you are at work or in a playgroup with a bunch of other moms. But that does not mean people donāt know how to say it.
Hi
a friend of mine said "did you ever hear...?" shouldn't it be "have you ever"? or are both correct?
Migrate means to just move. Immigrate is the verb to describe moving to. Emigrate is used with 'from' to indicate where they came from. It doesn't matter the locations.
I emigrated from Vanuatu. I immigrated to Samoa.
one could say ādid you ever hearā¦?ā Or āhave you ever heardā¦?ā If one were to say, āhave you ever hearāā¦that would sound very awkward.
uh sorry, i meant "have you ever heard", not "hear". was just wondering, cuz ig ive never heard "did you ever" before
I accept fk is used. But as you say: frick, fudge, frack, freak used by usa folk not used in Australia. The word doesn't scare Australians to need to water it down.
I think you didn't underatand my correction, the issue is that u said "from WHEN they migrate", but it's "from WHERE they migrate".
That verb is used to describe movement, a change of location.
No apologies needed. I think ādid you ever hear..ā sounds a bit less formal, but not incorrect.
My sentence is correct as i intended. "When a person migrates, they ...."
š
No, it was incorrect previously, u now edited it, and it works.
But the first "version" of your message was incorrect, the structure was flawed.
You think you know what that usage is about in the USA. I find that interesting and I would never presume to tell you why someone from Australia does the things that they do.
We live by us tv. š āāļø
TV is different than the way people talk in their lives at home.
I'm from there.
Some cred
mouse on a wheel
mouse in a wheel
which is the correct preposition?
It really all depends on which side of the wheel our mouse friend finds themselves
What do u think?
I like @Captain Olympus response to your question.
i have no idea
prepositions don't make any sense to me
i suppose 'in' but i need to use this phrase for a title that's why i'm confirming here.
I'd like them to answer the question first and then correct 'em of necessary
I think this is a good way to support someone else in learning
It would be 'on' for me.

'for you'?
On a wheel is like he is on top the wheel and "in" it's like he is inside
Sounds like that to me
Yes but mouse in wheels sounds weird
That's like him skating or sm
I've never heard anyone say mouse 'in' wheels
But also the second is on also in this case.
Hmm
see? it's confusing. we say 'on a plane' but we don't sit literally on top of the plane. 'mouse on a wheel' sounds more natural to me, too, but 'in' would make more sense for some reason
Usual for me to treat this as on the wheel, like on a ride at a show.
But location wise as drawn
Are you going on the ride. Yes. Well jump in
Yeah. There's a simple logic to that. For a vehicle in which you can move about, you use 'on'. Eg- on a plane, on a train, etc. For a vehicle in which you can't move about, you use 'in. Eg- in a car, in a helicopter
I think that one could probably use either in or on. As the mouse is surrounded by the wheel so the mouse is āinā the wheel, but is running āonā the wheelās inside surface like it is a vehicle of sorts.
@flat rune
okay, thanks. that's the reassurance i needed
The Guardian can be trusted for their English
exactly
Try reading good newspapers sometime
i'll definitely keep that in mind
They are very cheap cuz books can be expensive
i get my books for free)
===
I remember you [told/telling] me this once.
- Same thing?
- Any nuance?
:siprana:
