#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
basically they opened up a HOLE through wich aliens could come to earth
what do you say
Yes, that's pretty much what would have happened if the event occurred as i described it. 
is that you in your pfp
Only if you look through a Xen crystal.
I think it depicts aliens who came upon earth after the hole has been opened and they were let in
jk
resonance is the waves things make?
@distant oasis can you help with this
seems make sense
sci-fic is amazing
and overwhelmingly confusing

is it right to say As soon as playing football, i broke my leg = as soon as I played football
it sounds weird to me, my first idea would be to say "as soon as I started playing football"
a burger is only a sandwich with BEEF between it?
so a burger with FRIED CHIKCEN in between isnt a burger but a chicken sandwich? 🤔
guys, check my sentence please: We, smart people, should rely on strong bureaucratic pyramid.
should it be "THE" strong...
or
"A" strong pyramid of bureaucrats?
As smart people, we should be relying upon firm bureaucratic structures
But you're Italian, Italians don't speak English that good.

I understand, but you have your own beautiful language.
what does 'drop words exactly mean?
It was from words dropped by chance that little by little everything was revealed to me
this sentence is from The Little Prince I am currently reqding
I'd better learn Italian than English.
Nah
Remove words
No
I mean
actually
i guess
pros vs cons
Good things about it vs The bad things
pros = good
cons = bad
“Where are you going to school” sounds a lot better in that situation
“Where do you school” doesn’t sound good at all
Large cascade ?
no. reads as sci-fi gibberish even in that context.
i need an explanation.
isn't simple present tense used to indicate an unchanging situation? in this case, he schools?
sorry i don’t know what simple present tense is, and i never would use “schools” (except when i am talking about multiple schools, plural)
Counter Strike is a famous 5v5 shooting game,
there are 2 sides - Terrorists and Counter-Terrroists
🤔 what does "counter strike" mean?
🤔 "strike" means a terrorist action/operation?
"strike" is used as a military operation in the context of war, not specifically terrorist. Attacks or raids, essentially. counter strikes are strikes meant to counter another strike, typically in retaliation or defense.

Those two questions don’t ask the same thing
in “where are you going to school?”, school is a noun here, and it also shows that that the”you” is going to it. But in “Where does he school” school turns into a verb, and it’s no longer asking where he goes to school, but where he educates.
The simple present tense form here is "He goes to school." or "Where does he go to school?"
Isn't the first sentence more often used in the present simple (Where do you go to school?) The present progressive sounds really off here
Since it's a kind of a permanent fact ,it is more likely to use the present simple.
Yea exactly
A burger where i come from is called by what is in it. Be it a beef burger, hamburger(same), chicken burger, fish burger, salad burger. If it's in a burger bun, it's a burger. If it's in a bread roll it will be a <whatever> roll. If it's between two slices of bread it's a sandwich.
@flat rune was correct.
A strong bureaucratic hierarchial structure.
Where do you school is not used. You may say, where do you study?, meaning what school do you go to?
peo why are you a peo
Ask a scary question. Get a scary answer.
Capsicum capsigo.
What does” last resort” mean again
I’m a native but I forgot and too lazy to look it up
for example a point in your life where you have no solutions of solving your problems, thats how severe they are, and you have to end them with a certain solution which is the only one, then the solution is hour last resort
The last chance/hope
*your
Last attempt
cut my life into pieces
this is my last resort
etc, i gotta listen to that again, it always made me crazy
sorry I meant to say “where do you go to school” I just mistyped
but where are you going to school can sometimes work
Elaborate?
Not really. Just normal.
👍
“Much has happened that we couldn’t see. And the future will be nothing less than the flowering of our inwardness”
How would you interpret this quote?
I'm a beginner in English but from my perspective this quote define that - " in our life there are multiple events are occurring and directly and indirectly which we can't see but that event are helping us to grow our selves . This impacts are on our core. Not in outer side. That means you are the future of yourselves.
I don't know how much is correct but I feel that way.
Is there any other opinions please correct me
when is "where are you going to school?" preferably used?
What do you mean?
"Where do you go to school?" and "Where are you going to school?" are used completely interchangeably.
I've heard both and I use both
I don't know if this question was answered or not but I do know quite a bit about half-life. The term "resonance cascade" is mainly just used a sciencey word and I don't think it really means anything. However, what a resonance cascade is is ||(fun fact: "is is" is grammatically correct)|| the act of creating a portal to another dimension. The Xen crystal was the catalyst, or the cause of the event. The reason why it causes it I can explain later if you want me to, but that's up to you.
Hey guys, how are you doing? Do you have any good resources to learn english grammar rules? I learned on my own reading and watching movies, but i always had a lack in terms on grammar
#📚|english-questions is a pretty good one 😎
both can be used at any time, I don’t know any time they can’t be interchanged, since they both ask the same question
For real though, I think the best way to improve in grammar is to just write something and see how it's write or wrong. Think of like a topic or something and just write about it. You can use a google doc for basic spelling and grammar mistakes, but don't be afraid to ask someone to review it too.
Is the word school as a verb not used to mean "to go to school"?
not sure what you’re asking, but school cannot be a verb there because it’s the object of prepostion, meaning its a noun
oh the verb to school means to educate
Because in my native language, I use a verb.
Dimana kamu sekolah?
If I translate it word by word.
It's "Where do you school?"
I thought I can use the word school like in my language, looks like it's incorrect English
School isn't really supposed to be a verb, but native speakers use it sometimes because English you can really use any noun as a verb and it can make sense.
yeah its a rare verb to use since teach or educate is there, but when someone uses school as a verb we’d assume teach or educate
Ok, thank you.
Almost every speaker would say "Where do you go to school?"
The terms "Where do you learn?" or "Where are you educated?" while technically correct are never used by anyone
And also, yeah, nobody says "Where do you school?" in english
An example of using school as a verb I know I've heard before is like this:
"I have taken the role of schooling my children."
Interchangeable with the terms teaching and educating just like @round field had said
It's my bad to assume that the word "sekolah (INA) and school (ENG) " are used the same way
is “sekolah” a verb in your language? or does it work like a noun too?
Dimanakah kamu .. sekolah? = where do you .. verb.
Dimanakah sekolahmu? = Where is your school?
oh ok
I feel like most languages don't quite have the same flexibility as english does when it comes to words. You can pretty much use words in any way you want to in terms of informal speaking and writing
though not literally any way
what do you mean not literally
people will understand it but it is not correct
no wait i guess it can be correct?
this may make zero sense but nouns can be used as both verbs and adjectives and I don't think it's incorrect to do that, but it's just that not all of them can be used like that.

honestly I agree
trne
wait who am I kidding
we use nouns as adjectives all the time
and I think a lot of languages would too
"news reporter"
and like a lot of nouns also have verb counterparts like "vote"
this is nothing crazy this is like every day speech 🤦
I'm just dumb don't worry about me
Admit it guys
Neither you do understand what language do you speak
Is such a mess
I wouldn't say I don't understand it it's more I never thought about it
trme
but I will admit english can be a mess sometimes 😔
sometimes?
no it is just a mess
all the times
always the times
what is trme
intentional misspelling of true
english is classified not by when it doesn't make sense but by when it does make sense
Fffff
trme
like the word "still" can be used quite literally anywhere in a sentence and still make sense...still
i think most adjectives can
it's a lawless land, english
You can only use still when it's not right after a verb but other than that just put it wherever you want 👍
i'm glad the people who came up with english left their homework for others to figure out
because there was just one group of people who came up with the entire language
Honestly I m founding it easier just focusing on the way you speak, meaning the pitch and rhythm of your structures. It s like english is designed to be spoken politely
Like I'm trying to get in the mind of an attractive businessman of XIVV sec and that s kinda working
lol
I mean if that's what works for you then be my guest
I mean there has to be a reason it's used as the international business language, right?
it must just be really easy to sound professional because there's not really a difference between informal and formal
When you say 'My compliment to someone', does it have to be accompanied by a compliment?
“That was an excellent meal! My compliments to the chef.”
Could you just say it and skip the first half?
It's usually pretty awkward to leave out what you're complimenting
Personally I would never just say the second half on its own
“That was an excellent meal! My compliments to the chef.”
This is probably about what most people would say.
But they may also say "Send my compliments" instead of just "My compliments". Probably just a nitpick though.
I would say “props to the chef” instead of “my compliments to the chef”. Just an alternative to what you’re saying :))
Oh yes
hi
"Where have you been?"
i am new in here
that's okay.
Present perfect tense when in interrogative would use "have/has"
"Where has he gone?"
"What have you done?"
"Why has it rained?"
Those are present perfect interrogative sentences
ok, Thank
What can u say when ending the phone call for ex when we answer a phone call we say hello so what can I say when ending the call
"Bye" or "have a good day"
"Bye"
"Goodbye"
"See you later"
"Talk to you later"
These are all ones I would use
Ok thanks lot
👍
Hiii, is there someone who wanna practise word formation with me?
helo
I also wanted learn english
Learning any language can be difficult. I understand.
I made one table with these words, so i need someone who wanna practise with me... So if is someone interested lemme know to my dm
I will be happy and thankful 😁
I can definitely help where needed but I dont exactly need to practice them so I dont know if that's what you want or not
hi friends. "i used to get terrible Sunday blues" what does this mean?
sorry, google couldn't help me
Just fill your environment with english, You'll be fluent in no time, effortlessly
hello
Hi
As far as I know, "Sunday blues" is a phenomenon when people start feeling anxious on Sundays because they know that they have a work or school week ahead of them. It's also a kind of anticipatory anxiety.
thank you so much bro
👍
Literally me
It's pretty interesting there's a specific term for that
for me it even leads to feeling like i wanna cry
of course i do not, but it really is very intensive and it fills me up with deep hatred, but i know i can change that, cuz it all depends on your job/school and how much you enjoy that right
Yeahh
Studying any language is very hard. It becomes easier if you are immersed in English as much as possible
I started wondering what could have caused this change, and it dawned on me that it was simply the switch in songs.
What does it mean?
It means that they suddenly realised
Its not that hard rather than other language. I think what makes learning languages hard it's because we lack of practice.
Actually what makes it hard is how we think how hard it is, if that makes sense.
That's my opinion.
Can someone describe me how "Friendly" is not an Adverb?
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but there are many adjectives ending in '-ly', which might make them seem like adverbs, but they aren't.
(A) The twins are / (B) often told that / (C) they are resembling / (D) each other.
We need to find error
Often been told?
Idk just thinking
write the complete exercise, there isn't enough context here
I feel like the point b is incorrect
But I m still trying to figure out how might we edit it
C is incorrect. The verb "resemble" cannot be used in a continuous tense
Some verbs in English (called non-continuous verbs) cannot be used in the continuous form. You can look up a list online. For your question, "resemble" is one of these verbs
You either resemble something (true) or you don't resemble it (false). There is no inbetween, because there is no continuous action of becoming to look the same as something else
Adverbs naive words that describe verbs. An action cannot be done "friendly". One cannot say like "He greeted us all friendly." -- you would say "He greeted us all friendlily." although most people would just say "kindly" or "nicely".
A prime example is a word like "likely" which completely remains the same regardless of whether it's an adjective or an adverb.
Got it! Thanks
All depends on the meaning of the word (unrelated to the way the word is written)
A word ending in -ly doesn't have to be an adverb
Or just 'amicably'
Almost no one uses that word that I know lol
I do
I don't know you
That doesn't stop me from using it
True
I was just saying I don't know anyone that uses that word
it's very uncommon
doesnt make it wrong it's just uncommon where I am from
I am peo, And now you know of one
I know nobody one person who uses the word amicably
You sound like a very amicable person. I'm sure we can continue speaking amicably.
that's very amicable of you
My pleasure
Hello
I can say: i have studied english for 5 years in the Uk
Can i say:
I have studied english since 2000 in the UK
(Knowing that NOW im not in the UK, and i only studied there from 2000 to 2005)
Since is only for actions that begun in the past and till NOW right
We can't use it to describe a period of time in the last like for
You would say, "I studied English for 5 years back in 2000".
Yes but its wrong to say since 2005 because now im not there right
If i were there now then i can
You are correct. It is wrong
Okay thank you
You can also say ... i studied English between 2000 and 2005.
Was just making sure because im teaching this grammar today.
`hello bro
Still valid, tho I agree it's relatively uncommon in day to day convos
hi. have any questions or are you just saying hi
Hi
I have a question of processing mental, like I forget everything when I want to start a conversation, I know the verbs and grammars, but my nerves start hesitating and I can't talk in classes (I'm Spanish speaker, and Asia origins)
there's something to practice, except reading and practicing?
There in no easy answer other than keep practicing and don't think too much about getting everything right, it is tiresome but languages grows on you more you use them.
This is probably because you are trying to learn everything at once and you should focus on one thing at time, 1 verb tense, 1 grammar rule and then when you get it you can start with another thing.
And you have to speak alone at your house for sure so when you'll have a conversation you already prepared
Which one is correct?
- Are you ditching from school again?
- Are you ditching school again?
#2
Hello, could someone please help me by explain this word in the context of the book I’m reading?
I can’t send it here because I don’t have image perms
Doesn't*
Not very helpful 🙅♀️ when seeking help.
Can someone explain to me how to use "had" and "has"?
HAVE/HAS:
I, you have
He/she/it has
We,they have
HAD:
Past form of 'to have'
What's the word?
Hello
Person 1: ................to europe?
Person2: yes, two years ago.
So what do we put in the blank here:
-did you ever go?
Or
-have you ever been?
I guess most people would use have you ever been to...
So we can say both are correct grammatically
Yes, it is grammatically correct
However it isn't commonly used
I would stick with "have you ever been to... "
Hmm ok thx
Hi, in one video a woman says "I never see her in yoga class these days" Can someone explain this to me? "never" and "these days" cannot be used together in my language. I don't understand why she used it in that way.
Never is indeed wrong to be used here
If you use "did you ever go" is like you are saying that the person has an obbliagtion to be there, while "have you ever been" is a general question
"don't" would be used instead
"Never" is something that it doesn't happen at all, but "these days" means that the person came to the yoga class in the past, there is a contradiction so is incorrect
but it's video of an English teacher from London... she gave this sentence as an example. I don't know how I can trust her if she made this mistake 😄 isn't it some kind of exception or special usage that I don't understand?
Must be something else
You sure that is not "I**'ve** never seen her"?
The difference is suddle but she used present perfect to say "I never seen her and is still true today"
I'm personally confused why she used "in yoga classes these days"
You don't use never in a case where something used to happen but doesn't happen anymore. For that you use don't
Subtle*
Oh no
i can't send here screenshot but it's really "I never see her in yoga class these days"
This sentence is correct. There is nothing wrong with using never in this context. 'Never see her these days', is basically saying, in the past she used to attend the class. But now (these days) she is never there (to be seen).
@amber junco said "I've (I have) never seen her", indicates she was never seen in class in the past nor presently. This is different to your original sentence.
The use of 'these days' is describing a time close to the present and includes the recent past. An example in discord would be:
Last year Jack was always in the English hub. Earlier this year Jack stopped chatting as often. These days (recent months up until now), I never see him here.
The use of never is confined to 'these days'. It does not necessarily include the distant past, when it may have been true.
When i was young, I smoked. These days i never touch tobacco.
Disclaimer: never smoked. 🧜♀️
But I never seen "never" and "these days" used like this and I can't find any examples
Saying "I never touch tobacco these days" can be a bit contradictory because "never" implies an absolute and constant avoidance, whereas "these days" suggests a recent change in behavior.
It would be more precise to say "I no longer touch tobacco" or "I don't touch tobacco anymore" to convey that you have completely stopped using it. This phrasing aligns better with the idea that you've quit using tobacco.
That sentence is correct but only because of the extensive explanation provided before it
hi all. How will it be in an adjective? "Sunset "hands
Hi guys
"We found a stray cat in our house and now it became part of our lives"
Why did we say "became" and not "become" here although we are talking about the present not the past
Is there a name for this grammar or something i can look up
Simple past of "become", I'm assuming this phrase is telling about an event in the past so is like a story and you can read it as "...and from that time it became..."
if the cat is still there, you have to ask about it
please write the complete sentece
Sunset hands
I have a basketball related question. you know, every NBA team has its own dance team. so, the Suns have "Suns Dancers," the Sixers have "Sixers Dancers," so why does the Blazers' dance team called "Blazer Dancers," not "Blazers Dancers"?
is difficult talking about names because everyone does whatever they want with their titles.
You should actually use "now it has become"
Anytime
It does, but as i say, it's confined within the limits of 'these days'. Absolutely never these days, but not absolutely in the past.
For native speakers, it doesn't really need such an elaborate explanation.
Absolute and "constant" avoidance... In your case the avoidance isn't constant
I feel as though the explanation would be required so as to not make the structure sound odd
I have a bottle of fine wine. I drink it. It will never have that fine wine in it again. But it did. But it absolutely will never again. Never doesn't mean absolutely forever before and forever to come.
I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean to say
Never is not time ad infintum
How so?
I can't think of a case where it wouldn't be
It had wine. You're definition says the bottle cannot be described as never having that same wine in it again because you say never means it cannot have had wine in it to start.
English does not use that (your) definition of never to that extent.
I still don't get the sentence you're using as a reference
Can you perhaps separate it from the rest of the explanation so as to make it easier?
If you're saying that you had a bottle of fine wine and then you claimed that it will never have wine in it and it does have fine wine in it sometime in the future then your claim is incorrect
You're claiming that the wine will never be in the bottle again whereas it is, so the two statements are contradictory
But since the later can't be false as it is a fact, the first must be false and hence is wrongly used in this situation
I bought a bottle of wine. It had wine in it. I drank the wine. It will never have that same wine in it again.
You are telling me I cannot use the word 'never', now, because there was some wine in it in the past.
I am saying that in English, you can use the word 'never' for the period from when it was empty until the end of time.
Another example: i have a letter and read it. I then burn it. It will never be read again.
You used "will" in the sentence which shows that you're talking about that point onward
Yes
In the original example 'these days' is equivalent to 'will' in this example. The use of never is confined to a period of time, a subset of time. It does not have to apply to all of time all the time.
🧜♀️
Yesterday i saw her in yoga class. Today i never saw her. (Not in the entire day)
Hello^^ Today , my english teacher said "english people don't say "i don't see" but they say "i can't see" . Is it right ? she removed 1point from my assessment....
She is bad in english, right ?
It is perfectly clear to me
Send me a picture I ll tell you if she s bad
I don't see why she believes that. On contemplating my usage, I use 'don't see' being 'I don't understand... ', whereas 'I can't see' is used more when i am speaking literally about vision.
J
hi guys could you please check my sentence and correct if needed:
The world doesn't transit to EVs. EVs are luxury for most people.
EVs as in Electric Vehicles right? If so, then I'd write this as:
"The world hasn't transitioned to EVs (yet). EVs are a luxury to most people."
Transit (v) just means the act of carrying something to another place
Transition (v) is the word you're looking for. It means adapting something, making it more common, or getting used to something
Also you use present perfect because it's not true now, but can be true in the future
And you say:
- a luxury for... = these people have it
- a luxury to... = these people don't have it
=> If not many people have it, you should use the 2nd one (to, not for)
My answer above
OK so I was thinking last night (it was night where I live) and I realised that I never even said that never is used for an infinite time
I said that the avoidance is to be absolute and constant
Which means that you can't have a little bit of tobacco and say that you've never had tobacco
Nor can you say that if you've had tobacco in the past
I kinda went with the flow and argued that "never" is used when the time period is infinite which was where I was wrong
Never can and is usually used in such cases
However, without previous context, I would still say that that statement is incorrect
Nor is it correct in this case for the same reason
However, because of previous context, I find this statement to be correct
I don't see why it can't be correct
Once again, I'm not saying that "never" is used in situations where the time is infinite
However, "never" is usually only used in situations where the amount of time is very long
So saying "I've never seen her today" would be incorrect
So would it be in the sentence "I've never seen her in the past few days"
You could use "I've never seen her in the past one week" but that still sounds awkward
You may use "I've never seen her in the past month"
And depending on the situation you would definitely use never in the sentence "I've never seen her in the past one year" to emphasise that you've never seen her during this time period
However, "never", in my opinion is never used where the time period is short
And as for future cases, it is used to emphasise that something most likely won't happen
Because no one is to know what is to come in the future so you can't say for sure that something will never happen
How long is very long? Who decides how long is very long? Isn't it all relative
So what might sound awkward to you, sounds normal to me
I agree "today" isn't a good use case for "never", but "these days" and beyond are acceptable
Hmm... Doesn't sound like a good use to me, at least not in the actual question
But once again, as I said before, this is just my person opinion
You can still say something like "Since (something happened), I never touched a tobacco again." Still works
So the usage of "never" is more nuanced than "you can use it here, you can't use it there"
Exactly... It works but with previous context
Hmm right right. I forgot that part
If you use it as an adverb of frequency, then all your questions will be answered
What's the difference between gate and gateway?
Nice
what do you mean nice
I mean nice question
thanks
Highest IQ EngHub member
Hahaha
Technically doorway and gateway is the same thing. The only difference is that doorway is through a door and gateway is through the gates
Is the plural for "ignoramus" ignorami or ignoramuses?
My immediate instincts would say ignoramuses
I might need to check once tho
No more debate ig...
I'd say ignorami because of cactus-cacti, octopus-octopi, colossus-colossi and so on
But I guess both work
gateway could also be both the actual gate and the road or only the road?
tf does the word even mean xd
technically, the gateway is only the road
in practice, noone calls them gateways
people usually only really use "gateway" in the metaphorical sense, or in computer science
someone who is ignorant, it's really just a pretentious way of saying dumbass
I see xd, well i guess it's a complicated word to make the one being called it look more idiotic
Is the belief that I could do "the thing" was false a okay sentence?
This is a okay question to ask in this channel right?
Hello guys
She........ In a few minutes, do you want to go with her.
The options are "is leaving" and "leaves"
Now i know the correct answer is "is leaving"
But the questions is why
why do you want to leave with her in a few minutes
Yes
Why?
Don't know lol i just want to leave
It's because this is something that is happening now right so we use continuous
Both are actually grammatically correct.
Then if im doing a test and this popped up what do i choose
Also shouldn't "in a few minutes" indicate that this action will happen in the very near future which requires continuous?
I would say the more appropriate choice is “is leaving” because as you said, it happens in the very near future. “She leaves” can still be correct… but may not convey the same sense of immediacy-
eh, imo it has the opposite effect, where the person saying ignoramus comes off as self absorbed but thats just my take
Did you get the answers from a worksheet or something?
present progressive can also express future scenarios, "it refers to a future event in connection with a present plan" as my grammar book says
yes but in the olden ages it mightv been like that
idk how old the word is but it sounds like it came from ye olden english
No someone asked me there ate no answer sheets
Oh
Ok
i mean neither "is leaving" nor "leaves" inherently implies how soon it'll occur
i actually think leaves sounds more natural
fewer syllables, more concise, sounds like something id say
No, the sentence is not correct. The correct sentence would be: "She is leaving in a few minutes, do you want to go with her?"
This is ChatGPT answer
But didn't give me the reason so i asked here
But i get what you said....
Yeah that’s why I said “may”
True
True
Erm
Well both are fine
Yes i understand
Thanks for the help
"She is living" sounds less harsh than "She leaves", the second one might suggest that you can't do anything about it
disagree
agreed
Argue please
Interesting
they genuinely both sound very neutral to me
she's leaving sounds more open and the leaves does indeed invoke feelings that it's unavoidable, though both neutral i would argue she's leaving sounds better
well that's rather peculiar
maybe its a regional thing
i personally wouldnt use is leaving
Geez english grammar can be confusing sometimes 😂
Both can sound like it’s unavoidable
maybe, or its because the type of sentences i read generally
Fr
true, she is leaving now. is also a way of making it seems unavoidable
cest la vie
although in this particulat sentence i would say is leaving feels best for me personally but i dont think it would be all too wrong to use she leaves
she leaves sounds verry resolute to me
In general i find natives less strict about grammar than foreigners who learn it
this tbh
but that applies to a lot of languages
Natives can’t explain grammar but we can tell u what sounds right😭
Is not a matter which sounds better to you but how natives use it, I heard many times "she is leaving" as begging of the action while "she leaves" is already decided and mostly done
Like they have more flexibility
hello! :D
Haha yes
think about it this way, "is" is a verb, you can genuinely add more verbs in front of it and it can still be grammatically correct without changing the meaning or implications in the slightest
"she is to be leaving"
is also correct
she is leaving is what i read in books and hear on social media platforms, I dont know how its used in every-day life by natives since I am not one but i would say she is leaving would the best here
sht i forgot to capitalize one of my I's
why tf does that even need to be capitalized
English had no institution for his language for long time so there are many exceptions and weak rules sometimes by grammar books, but most of it is clear
english is a descriptivist language, its institutions do not dictate what is right
thats basically all languages rn @amber junco unless they are more modernized recent ones
they merely document it
can any of yall proofread my thing rq cz i have a discussion bout the prject in like 15 minutes
etymology specifically but i should be able to answer questions on why certain word orders sound right, and why others sound funky
From what i see "is leaving" is the correct option to choose in a test because we study strict grammar
But natives are used to use grammar with more flexibility
Is not cause "she is(be) to be leaving" you cannot repeat the same verb on the same clause
yes, yes you can
you can absolutely say is to be
So if you want to learn real English you have to listen to natives talking
she's to be leaving is correct in most instances
nice
"he is to be executed by firing squad"
Yeah cuz thats who ur gonna be talking to in the real world
That sentence is correct
hello there, i am notfying you about your girlfriend, she is to be leaving for South Africa soon, you better properly say goodbye
Of course
You will never use it
she is to be your lawfully wedded wife
Like buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo
its a phrase that genuinely comes up
typically in more formal registers
but a common one nonetheless
I might use it in certain circumstances like for example, "she is to be leaving for London tonight"
i digress
i digress too
what have you had
i woudl use it in this situation indeed
should we maybe call a teacher for help instead of continuing this pointless conversation of opinions?
You can get in pretty stupid places in English but most of the native avoids too many words on their sentences, is not natural unless you are talking to a noble of whatever and even them they are dismissing this kind of speach
Lmao
brittish people exist
I'm living in the UK
well english is the bastard child of multiple european languages so very few of the rules actually make sense once you zoom out
But it has a kinda sense of command and control like you're saying that it will happen and it will happen
"she leaves" has the same effect
yeah thats the point of saying that
It's like whatever you do, you can't stop that from happening
thats true, i'm simply arguing is to be would be a correct sentence
Formal😒
i think you lot are reading too far into it lol
The root of your phrases gives nuances to what are you trying to say
how you interpret it makes no difference in this context as objectively its a rather neutral statement
It is correct, but I think "is leaving" would be better to be used in that kinda situation
each to their own ig
bleh
The way masses interpret statements is what makes the tone in a language
this phrase specifically, none of the ways its been worded are pragmatically different from one another
i get that pragmatic definitions are important but these ones specifically to most people, are effectively the same
how long have u been studying english for? (sorry random question)
its my first language
i just wasnt sure whether to take the native role or the fluent role as the country im from, while having english as an official language, isnt predominantly english speaking
Fair
i however, grew up speaking english and to this day speak more english than i do the local language
bilingual
Cool
indeed
That sounds more like you are native
i couldnt be arsed to pick up a new role though
Lmao
not entirely sure where id even look for it
that aside
"is leaving" might sound correct to the most people as thats how english is taught as a second language
but its not inherently better than "leaves", which grammatically, is how germanic languages typically would phrase that
You can use any form, it's a free country.
that was the point from the start
eugh
@mortal citrus do you think i should pick up the native role?
Yes
Better
¯_(ツ)_/¯
wdym
" china probe row adds to EU's green deal woes "
Is it row meaning dispute
Yeah and probe meaning inquiry
That s so tough
Yes. That is argument/disagreement in that context
Yes probe is inquiry
🧜♀️
When you don't want to be too specific, because it's not so complicated, you know?
Or maybe the other person already knows what you're saying, so you just mention it to get to the more important parts, you know?
Or you don't know yourself so you ssy some thing simple and follow with you know.
Only the passage that you're going through
"In today's society" or "in the society of today" for formal writing?
1st one sounds better
can you help me? is it "luxury for most people" or "luxury to most people"?
EVs are a luxury for most people.
For
what does "addressing" an issue excatly mean? 🤔
start to talk about it and to fix it
pointing out an issue and discussing about it
More stress on the talking part and less on fixing
💩
is this British caster speaking in a RP? 🤔
if not what region is he mostly likely to be from?
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMVk1YubLO0)
JUMP TO 27:20
http://www.esl-world.net/masters/season6/kiev/
Counter-Strike Grand Final: Natus Vincere vs. SK Gaming at the Intel Extreme Masters in Kiev, Ukraine
January 19th - 22nd 2012 CyberSport Arena
Intel Extreme Masters is a part of the Electronic Sports League. Check out our latest videos and watch our tournaments LIVE!
==-==-==
IEM:
http://www.inte...
The left one is from somewhere in northern england but probably not way up there, like if you drew a blob encompassing yorkshire and greater manchester I imagine you'd include him. His accent isn't super strong so I can't tell exactly. Could be a touch further south than that
The right one sounds very south-east
Can't be far from London I'd say
Anyway no neither of them speak RP, pretty different
But then almost nobody does hehe so that shouldn't be surprising
Forgot to ping-reply :)
Oh it actually shows their names
Ok yea they're well known enough that their birthplaces are on google lol
Rotherham (South Yorkshire) and Shoreham (indeed not very far from London)
can anyone help me with this question, please
“ Do the zakis live next door to you?
- No, but they……..
a) used to do. b) used to did
C) used to. D) are used to doing
C)
C)
C)
I don’t know guys but there’s a slight chance it might be C) 🤔
Does anyone know any good source for vocabulary and grammar?
I have an C1 and i am now aiming for C2
My weaknesses are grammar and vocabulary
Specially vocabulary
I’d love to know more how to talk more formally
Adverbs like '' with '', '' for '' where should we put them in the sentence? after the Object?
"sound" Is singular if the were many "sounds" they are plural
"sound" is singular so you use is
"with" and "for" are not adverbs - I don't understand the question
After an object?
I'm pretty confused too lol
depends where the prepositional phrase is
Damn is 1 am, I have to go
"For most of you, it does not matter."
"It does not matter for most of you."
Those are both correct
like what
also seeya later 👋
I would be able to talk about it if I $$ the whole thing.
had been able to see
saw
had seen
those are all correct
they're just in different forms
so it depends which form you're trying to use
If someone speaka really slowly, like at the end of every word and sentence,
We say that person speaks with a DRAWL? 🤔
For example how would u talk in a job interview
Or writing an email to a company
That sort if things
of*
Unfortunately, formal ways to say smth are spread out everywhere as far as I can see:
Phrasal verbs, e.g. to put in
"He put in for a transfer to the division..."
Compound expression, e.g.
"Money-laundering sting"
Simple vocabulary, e.g. "to buy out a company"
So it s very hard to be able to access organized data for that purpose, it might be a good idea to just start working together on it
@river basalt
Word of the day:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ygE01sOhzz0&pp=ygUgc3BhY2ViYWxscyBsdWRpY3JvdXMgc3BlZWQgc2NlbmU%3D
Lord Dark Helmet discovers the dangers of travelling at ludicrous speed.
An absolute hilarious scene from Mel Brook's sci-fi parody. The film was released in 1987.
I hope you enjoy it.
👍
Ehhh buckle this! 😂
Y'all, I know this is so random but what is antecedent? Like can it be two or more words? Or just the noun which the pronoun is referring to?
What if it is like "Everything in the jewelry case has its own price tag", what is the antecedent? Would it be the "jewelry"? Or "Everything in the jewelry"?
It would be ' everything in the jewelry case'
It can be a phrase.
An antecedent is the first clause of a sentence splittet by "if, because, than, so..."
There is no antecedent here because they are part of the same clause
They mean the antecedent of the pronoun

So Peo is right here... the entire phrase is the antecedent
What about "its own price tag"? Is not a clause
Wdym?
This is a simple sentence so no question of a clause...
Oh right now I got it
"Everything in the jewelry case has it(jewelry)'s own price tag"
Its when you are forced to use a pronoun
How about in the example "Few of the members on the girls' team had arranged their own transportation"? The pronoun is "their" since "few" is plural, but what about the antecedent?
Is it "Few of the members"? Or "Few of the members on the girls' team"? THIS IS SO CONFUSING 😭
The latter
Hi. Could you help me understand what the word "Cools." means in slang? I know that "Cool! means "very good, excellent" but I've never seen the plural form ("Cools") before.
Do you remember where you've seen this?
I've seen it in a private conversation with an English speaking person. 🙂 Do you think it's just a mistake?
Wait for someone who knows about it... I can't think of anything atm
Hi I need to write the sentence "Don't forget to phone me tomorrow" in reported speech. Any ideas??
whats reported speech
He/She/It/You/They told me not to forget to phone you the following day/the next day.
you can also start with "I was told to... "
thanks 😻💜
but like, it depends on the context, sometimes you may be able to just replace "tomorrow" with "yesterday", if, for example, you are talking about that event from the perspective of one day after that
but usually textbooks/tests like to teach to replace "tomorrow" with "the next day/the following day"
I didn't know about it. Thank you very much
thats like when u wanna say that "somebody told you to... something" instead of "They were like... [and literally insert what they said]" or "They said '[insert what they said word to word]'"
so
you are essentially saying that somebody told you something, but from the perspective of some time that passed already
for example:
He was like "just do this" -> is not reported speech
He said "just do this" -> is not reported speech
He told me to do that. -> is reported speech
I was told I should have done that. -> is reported speech
so, the words related to time like "yesterday" or "tomorrow" get replaced with "one day before/the next day/the following day" etc, this gets replaced with that, these gets replaced with those, the tense of the sentence that the person told you is also supposed to be 1 tense back in time
tbh all of this is lengthy, like modern speakers just say "He was like..." and quote what they were told, with none of those complications, but thats the "correct way"
They warned me not to forget to phone them the next day.
Just put a suitable speaker to your choice
wow, actually, i think i sometimes have an urge to say "to not do" instead of "not to do" lol
like "My sister was told not to leave the doors open." i sometimes say like "My sister was told to not leave the doors open"
which is... is it actually incorrect?
Nope, both r correct iirc
They have very subtle nuance in them
Talking about before: grammatically speaking, what is "some of" connected to a noun? Is as an adverb, an adjective or else?
Exemple: some members of the organisation
some = adjective
of = preposition
members = plural noun, the = article, organisation = singular noun
"some" is connected to "members", "of" is connected to "organisation"
because we indicate that there are certain members of an organisation, like there are some employees/participants of it, anyone working in it, and we dont know which ones exactly, we dont give the exact names, so we say "some"
"of" because we indicate what the members belong to
Do you not think that "he was like 'just do that' " is also reported speech, as "he was like" is potentially slang for 'he said' or 'he was saying something like...'
it is not
because for it to be reported speech, there would have to be those changes occuring
those changes meaning tense being switched to one before, etc
and they occur only after expressions like "I was told..." and so on, like i think ive even seen a list of those, but now i just keep on relying on my intuition so
hi guys, I wanted to find a word to described that I'm annoyed but not really annoyed, i found "miffed", but do yall have better terms?
I think you will be "bored" before you are starting to be "annoyed"
Also usually English people use "a little bit" to not sound rude
well, i am annoyed and want to convey that but dont want to use the word "annoyed" as it seems strong
yaknow when youre talking with someone in a formal setting, you dont want to use strong words, so im looking foor a word to demonstrate that i am annoyed but not be too direct (as that would be rude, imo)
The tense can be present or past. The aim is to convert what someone said into a sentence that you are now reporting to your listener. I can tell others that" you told me it is not", it's reported speech of what you said. If you argue with me, i may phrase my reported speech to others as "he was like so confident that he was saying it was not". That is still reported speech. I could also write this now in present tense and say "he is telling me it is wrong" .
A bit pissed
(not totally pissed)
please read my second comment
1 moment I'm getting there
pissed is stronger than annoyed and is informal
Anything less than informal, is sitting at the Queen's table. But let me think. I can only see in my head some pompous gathering so I'm probably going to over do the politeness.
im not in a rush and you dont have to answer if you dont have any
I can wait for answers from other natives too
Irked, bothered are alternatives. If it wasn't that bad, i would still be adding. A bit irked, or a little bothered.
Not a bother
hmmm those sound good i think, thanks!! ill see if theyll work with my text
But I'm in Australia, so pissed would be accepted in the office, maybe not to the ceo though.
no way really?? 😲
i mean if youre talking to colleagues that youre close with, sure why not
good day eeveryone
but not in a more formal setting 😰
Even an immediate boss or project team
If we had to call it boss 'sir' it would not be used.
huh i see
But that is not common
Let's say Australian business is reasonably casual. If a Japanese company has an office in Australia, then 'sir' would probably be being used. It really depends on the origins and formally of the company and the closeness of the bosses to the staff.
good to know, thx very much for the help!!
For instance i work in a 3000+ company. I sat next to the current ceo before he became ceo. I am also older. I am happy to talk at that level with him. A graduate from uni may be a little more cautious and be more polite. If i walk into an office where everyone is wearing suits, i would need a little less informal and more polite in speech. Some companies like law firms, accounting firms like the formally and force ties and suits. But the majority these days are not that formal anymore unless they have an image of professionalism that must be maintained. One just needs to judge each situation as it is presented.
@mossy birch
Well, I've not conciously taken notice of this word 'cools'. If i heard it especially online i word take it as 'cool, cool [...]', which still has to be interpreted in your local slang. But could be 'fine', 'totally agree', 'no doubt', and in some locales may even mean the opposite to cool such as 'cool/sarcastically', 'not cool its nerdy'.
A good reference for any slang is urbandictionary.com. . Bookmark it if you don't know it.
But hey, i won't lie. I checked it to see if there was something obvious and i got through 30+ pages of 'cool' without seeing a single reference to 'cools' but it's highly likely it's going to be a 'cool, cool'
interesting, cool to know
Greetings ! I wanted to ask about if someone passed the ielts test and got a good score , i really need someone to help and i cant afford a teacher so if someone is available to help me and give me some advices about the test , that would be much apreciated thank you very much 🙏
Yooww, another one. Neither is singular right? But when it is used like "Neither the cat or dogs want to eat their food", the pronoun should be their since the closest to is dogs. But what if it is only "Neither of the dogs wanted to (its or their) food"?
Should I still follow what I did in the previous one? Orr does it only apply when there is like an option (eg cat or dogs)?
dogs is plural
you use their with plural
even if you say
"neither the cat nor the dog want to eat . . . food" you would still use their
because you're talking about more than one thing
Ty
She said he failed the exam, didn't he/didn't she?
Could anyone here tell me which is right?
I think both are right but mean different things. "didn't he" means that you want to sure whether he failed the exam. "didn't she" means that you want to sure whether she has said the thing of his failing the exam. This is my opinion.
Thank u
You are checking twice if the information is true so you are referring back to the person who told you witch is a woman so is "didn't she"
so u Think “didn't she” is right, don't u?
Isn't it?
It's as@fickle nimbus said. You can use both, but they refer to two different meanings.
Who are you asking about. That depends on which to use
so u Think “didn't she” is right, isn't it?
I don't think either. You are the one asking. Who are you referring to?
I understood the different meanings. But the grammar book tells "didn't she"is more normaly
Yes. That is the more likely response.
Hallo
Hi haan
Didn’t she is the correct one because “she said”. She is the subject in this sentence.
thank u
anyway
Anyhow
What do you say when someone said "What year are you?"
i know they are asking the "year" but can i just say the generation? "class of 13th"
in a school
Class of ... It's good
If someone asks what year are you, and you are still in school it may mean just the cohort. Say 10, 11 or 12 or 1st 2nd 3rd final
Oooh okay thank you 👍
Hi! This is my first question here on this server. I am wondering if anyone can enlighten me on the difference of "I find myself loving her" and "I find myself to love her." I try these two on grammar checker and they are both grammatically correct. Are there nuances between the two? Do they mean the same?
What's the difference between being cocky and being cocksure?
Being cocky is having a sorta attitude annoying to others
I know what it means, to be smug or overly conceited. I'm just in two minds about the etymology or the relation between those 2 adjectives
Cocksure is someone who's conceited and arrogant
I find myself loving her is natural. The other would not be heard in general use. The 2nd does not really make sense.
Cocky is a tad bit funny... like when someone's cocky, they're doing it cuz they find it amusing
Cocksure is merely being overly conceited and arrogant
So people might still like a cocky person but they wouldn't like someone who's cocksure
The literal meaning of the second while syntactically correct is semantically incorrect, except for the completely obscure chance that is what you are doing.... 'looking for yourself because you may be mentally lost, for the purpose of becoming in love with her'. It sounds complex, because it is general nonsense.
@forest solar solve and resolve
What's the subtle difference between them ?
Oh, i thought they were synonyms
Please, could u explain the difference ?
Oh. Sorry. I thought you were referring to my previous response.
🥳🙅♀️
Lmao, all good
Thank you!
So, let me read this...
A basic view is 'resolve' means to bring something like a problem or issue to an end or conclusion. It may be done as required or possibly in a less than ideal manner. It can apply to say a dispute between two parties in a contract dispute or s conflict between two countries.
Solve is determining an answer to a problem. What are the steps required to find an answer. This could be a repeatable steps problem such as a mathematics equation, a rubics cube, a maze, sudoko etc .
'Resolve' is usually involving negotiation, and 'solve' just uses the correct series of steps or actions.
@swift briar
The first. I've never smoked.
yes
"Getting carried away with work" - you are currently in the process of being carried away by work
Are there 2 morphemes in the word "special"?
ik i mean does that mean getting too excited with work or what
Getting carried away basically means you're only caring about it or only worrying about it - to the point that you're overendulging in it
“I have never smoked” present perfect tense: you are saying something you have never done before. It doesn’t mean you can’t do it in the future.
You can say “I’ve been smoking” when this action started in the past and contunues to the present
funny that the present perfect and past perfect while being so similar imply completely different things
like "I had never smoked (before)" is almost almost followed up with "but" or "until" because usually when you say it like that it means you would have started smoking recently or something similar to that
The structure is basically the same: subject + had + past participle, but past perfect is tricky because you need two actions that are connected to one another. That’s why it’s called past from the past.
You don’t even need the second part of the sentence, which is implied with prepositions, but s connection with something is needed
However, at least in my case, students find quite hard to understand the future perfect
I find myself loving her, according to my knowledge is the correct structure. You have the verb + verb pattern (find) (love). Find is a verb followed by an ING verb (not continuous).
hello everyone
i'm kareem from egypt and i'm here for learning english if anyone can help me i hope so
either they mean a special area in a plane for the baggage specifically
or
or this, but this one is usually a train thing, so probably this would make zero sense talking about the planes, i call this, cuz i heard it being called like that, a "baggage rack" lol
The luggage hold is where non carry-on luggage is stored which is located beneath the passenger cabin.
^^
Jumatan day guys
That's called the overhead compartment. The luggage hold is under the plane, (under the seating floor)
Unlike a train, where it typically is a rack and so 'luggage rack', on a plane it needs to be closed (compartment) so the stuff doesn't fall on people in turbulence.
A question here. Which one of the following is correct?
a) The dragon's poison mist-spewing ability.
b) The dragon's poison mist spewing ability.
One with a hyphen between "mist" and "spewing" and one without.
Both would be ok. No one will care. No one actually reads the combination mist and spewing that often to notice either way.
@hollow night
But put the hyphen in.
thanks for the feedback!
How to write a ppa?
If you mean that the dragon can spew 'poison mist', it is one adjective, and there should be 2 hyphens, like so: 'The dragon's poison-mist-spewing ability'
thanks for the feedback! 🙂
guys is anyone taking IELTS exam?
i just finished ielts last month
Hi! Does anyone know if there is a difference in pronunciation between "Team" and "Teem"?
I dont think there is
ahhhh i see
okay
sometimes it is quite silly but it happens that non-natives use some noun to refer to something, cuz they think thats the name of that thing cuz that would be their native way of calling it, but then they realize it is absolutely not the way
or even worse, they heard it being called in a wrong way, they memorized this, and now they assume it is the normal way lol
thanks Peo
One should never learn the swear words of a language first. They will be the first words to be used when the actual word for a sentence can't be remembered or isn't known.
Exactly the same sounds.
hi everyone!
Whats he saying at the beginning? 🤔
(https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KOwwv21iMxk&list=PLCnUW44ywkDNNxUWaKLKM7u1oedMS3R8-&index=37&pp=iAQB)
I TWEET 6543 TIMES A DAY: https://twitter.com/launders
Esports content creator of the year - vote4lau: https://esportsawards.com/vote/
The pit player of all time, sdy played some great CS. In this video we go over the spot and talk about sdy, role changes, stats comparisons and NAVI's state/future. Enjoy!
ALL OF MY LINKS: https://find-...
Hello @All I want to know what is the best way to do an English assessment?
which is more commonly used, nearsighted or short-sighted?
nearsighted is a medical term for eyes
so you usually use short-sighted?
yeah
they have similar definitions
short-sighted: lacking imagination or foresight
is this correct and natural?
"That person is unclear."
If that person often talks and no one understands
"that person is being unclear" makes better sense
why? what's the difference than the other one
the second one is not as rude as the first
it can give off you are making fun of somone
Hi, anyone know what is the right word to call a small restaurant?
I always read through it all first, allocate some appropriate time for everything, and then did the easy stuff first and worked through the hard stuff last.
You may be best saying 'I didn't understand anything they said', rather than they were unclear, as the original may be related to you rather than them,.... Unless you know they are just waffling on, which would make you mad for wasting your time, in which case you can say what you wrote, as you are just stating a fact.
what is waffling on
I've eaten at some places with only 4- 6 seats and we still called them a restaurant. If you are looking for something to make a place then it depends on what it sells, what culture it comes from, then the may be some local weird that could be used. If you are needy speaking with a friend then saying I know of a (small, little, cute, cozy, petit, quiet) are all good adjectives to use with restaurant/eatery/diner/food place.
Talking without saying anything of substance or importance.
(like me with my long descriptions)💃
A bistro.
I see, thank you Peo!! Very helpful 
Thank you Fenti 
when I say I wish (name) were real should I use were or was
Can you say”im doing okay for the most part”?
idk - i could say like "i wish superman were real" and "i wish superman was real" and i've heard both
yes
thankss 
i'd say "was" feels more common but again i've heard both
do you know which one is grammatically correct?
I would say when dealing with like proper or singular nouns you'd say "was" like "i wish superman was real" but when using more general or plural nouns "were" usually like "I wish superheroes were real"
if that makes sense
yeah that makes sense but i saw once someone using were with singular nouns like u said "superman" so i was confused
yeah
like it's not correct but some people still use it
i think it's just a native speaker thing
yeah
thankss
If you are stating a fact, then use was. If you use it in a as wish or desire, use 'were'+ the infinitive form of a verb. In your case 'to be real'. Look up subjunctive mood for more information and examples.
so it's similar to " I wouldn't go there if I were you."
it's not real so I have to use were
that's also a pretty fair perspective
Yeah, 'were' here is also the past subjunctive
Hlo
I am just riding about past subjunctive
Riding about?
Past subjunctive
I cant understand what u mean by 'riding about'
Idk how to say that in English😩my English not good enough
No worries
I suppose you meant "reading"
Yes, that's exactly what i mean thanks
Oh I see
Hi can you tell me about grammar
And i though they were saying riding -> 'writing'
I suppose it could be, but I just went for the word with the same pronunciation (at least for my native language)
Without too much thought on the subject....
If you are speaking about something hypothetical, using 'if' for example, then the clause in the if would be in subjunctive mood. For example "if it were me, i would probably go to the beach". If ( phrase in subjunctive mood form) then ....
@cloud raft
I will remember it thanks
How can i learn new vocabulary?
I try too much to remember but just remember for a short time
There are various ways, mostly you will get them by watching or reading English media but you can also try a grammar book or apps I guess, Duolingo is kinda rubish but it gives you somehow the foundations
Watching stuff with English subtitles and stop every now and than also helps
Me too😭
When i dont know a word ,i’ll stop and looking for the meaning?
Is it the best way?
Reading/listening to (audio)books helps enrich your vocabulary tremendously
That way you can see how words are used in certain contexts
Plus it's fun (so long as you pick a book you'd enjoy reading/listening to)
Try and look for books or online readers that have a glossary. This is a list of the major words in a book or passage.
You can also put these words into a flash card program or even on paper flashcards and use them to repeatedly show you the words and the translation to your mother language. This will help remember them.
Alternatively just read books and look up the hard words in a dictionary. Also put these into your flash card list. When sitting on a bus or bored, pull out the flash card deck and read, translate and memorize. Spend about 5 minutes on groups of about 20 cards and as they become easy, remove them from the deck, until you know all of them. Move on to the next 20 word. 5 minutes, after about 60-80 words, put them all together again and shuffle and run through the words again, pulling out the easy ones and leaving the harder ones.
Yes, but i guess no also
how 2 poems 😩
hi american person,
is the ice cream brand 'Carvel' popular?
=====
Jam was practically 'spillling out of his stroller' trying to get another look as the babysitter pushed him away.
🤔 like water spilling out of a cap?
Ummm
🫡
i is good

Yes like when water over flows a glass
🫡
do i say “ I used to DO on a really good level gymnastics” or “I used to BE on a really good level gymnastics”
You can say "I used to BE AT a really good level of gymnastics", but a more normal sounding sentence would be "I used to be very good at gymnastics".
Yeah... add a determiner tho
Hello, guys. What does this mean? "stare the rocket of right thinking in the past" 
yes
death - could be "adjective"?
Nope, 'dead' is an adjective
thx
Can I use "dear" with a friend or is it wrong?
Dead and deadly are adjectives, 'death' isn't. Interestingly enough, 'deathly' could also be an adjective, and it could mean nearly the same as 'deadly', but it could also have a different meaning
Is it for an email or something?
yeah you would use Dear [name] ,
My dear friend zoro
Or you could say, Dear zoro
If u want to write messages
In a formal way
Hello, anyone know which is correct?
2023 Brgy election or 2023 Brgy elections?
Email hack checker: Has my email been compromised?
What does compromised mean there?
Hacked
Can anyone help me do my homework?
Elections...
Do it yourself first. If you have any doubts then ask it here.
You'll need to tell us your answer first
ok
Why can't I send a picture?
You need to reach level 5
I might have been sleeping - what does it mean? What does this construction mean?
it means that the speakers was probably sleeping, they do not say they were, but they say that maybe it was happening, likely, not certainly
*speaker
it is actually present perfect continuous with a modal verb "might", if you want the name of that construction
But ppc used to discribe something in the past till now
It is interpreted they were or may have been sleeping up until they made their statement.
(So present perfect continuous)
Also remember it does not have to be up until the exact moment, but it implies it was going on up until now approximately. It's not important the exact second, rather it's the essence of just until now.
What about if it conversation about the past?
You have to use past tense or be at past tense is to describe something that happend long time ago
"I might slept that time"
"I might was sleeping that time"
There is little to no difference between two in this case
Wht that perosn said med that construction
Like it was in the past and i joined the server and they told me that sentence
Maybe till that moment in the past??
Is it okay if I write "I have already sent an email to .... (email address)"? or should I say "at ..."?
To sounds better to me.
"to" is waay better
thank you
Not when it's after a modal
It can be completely in the past
Because we have no other way to make a past tense after "might"
We can't do this, for example. These sentences aren't right
The only choice we have is to use "have"
If you use "Have" shouldn't mean that you have just woke up?
"I missed that class last week because I slept in. I should have woken up earlier."
This is talking entirely about the past
Wouldn't you use past perfect for that?
You can't
"should" is a modal, so it has to have a bare verb after it
"should had" never works
Just like you can say "did sleep" but not "did slept", "can be" but not "can is" or "can was"
The 2nd verb is not conjugated
Oh I see, "might" is also modal
Wooow
hello
can i say "discuss over" here? or should the preposition be on/about? or maybe none?
"we discussed over the projects"
"discuss over" is about discussing while doing a thing, with, or over a period of time
If you are talking about the project you have "discussed about" it
You are not discussing while doing the projects right?
Thx
can u make an example with "discuss over"?
We discussed over the phone about the projects
We discussed over launch and we talked about the projects
We discussed over the week, giving updates about the projects
No proposition needed. Just can we discuss projects, i would like to discuss bad English, or let's discuss Taylor Swift.
We discussed projects over the phone
We discussed candles over dinner.
We discussed project updates over the week(during the week)
Peo always corrects me
at least this time I was almost right
Saw you typing
ty guys 🙏
Sorry but...
I have been corrected after

