#šļ½english-questions
1 messages Ā· Page 41 of 1
clang, tinkle and ring what are the differences between those ?
"clang" is most intense out of all three of those and "tinkle" is the least intense
i have some questions regarding some potentially offensive words
like, when people say "you're being bxxchy" or "bxxch about something", how do you distinguish their actual mood? is it just a phrase to joke around about with friends, or are people actually irritated and this word is considered very inappropriate?
sorry if this question is inappropriate as well
If said amongst friends groups, it's just a way of saying the person is complaining a lot. If they are screaming and saying it, they are more annoyed also with the person. If it is a stranger, they are also very annoyed with the stranger. Not used by men so much unless they are +60 or is being passed down in a family where it was used commonly. Definitely still used by women of all ages.
thank you!
Can somebody recommend me a toefl book for me to study? I will take toefl in October.
I have a question for the native speakers
How often have you guys heard the expression "from the outset"?
What does it mean?
In what context am i supposed to use it?
chatgpt says stumble on something can imply that you caught your foot on something.
For me, rarely.. it just means āfrom the beginning/startā. You can use it like this, āFrom the outset, we wanted to help themā. This implies that from the beginning they wanted to help and they continue to do so now
other common ways to express this is āfrom the start/beginningā, āsince the beginningā or even āfrom the get goā (more informal)
But why would I choose this expression in place of "from the beginning"?
That much is not yet clear to me
they are basically the same, so whatever u want is fine
I see
Is it understanding the little differences?
Like there's plenty of synonyms for tired for instance
That too
oh yes
Sometimes It seems to me like some words or idiomatic expression literally have the same meaning
Like in the case of from the outset/from the beginning
Then the question is: what stops me from using the more educated one?
If they're essentially equivalent in meaning
tbh itās just whatever suits u, so if āfrom the outsetā comes to mind first then thatās ok
Yeah
Got it
Ty
Cat approved
āļø
Amazing
which is correct?
- "she leaves, and everyone has a fault about it"
- "she leaves, and everyone is to blame"
1st sentence seems odd to me, āfaultā doesnāt make sense at all so please clarify what u meant in there. 2nd sentence works fine.
I don't know what to tell you man. I've tried explaining how the different words will be interpreted to a native speaker. If you are satisfied with ChatGPTs explanation then by all means, use it.
can you give me examples where stumble means trip
I understand well that words can differ in meaning depend on the context
maybe i tried to do a literal translation from my native language lol. i just mean everyone did something for her to leave, in a way that it's their fault and they are guilty
He was walking through the bushes when he stumbled. = Would imply that something made him lose his balance
He was walking through the bushes when he tripped. = would imply that he caught his foot on something and fell.
Stumble rarely means trip
when does it mean trip? can you give me an example please
I stumbled on a small rock and fell.
I tripped on a small rock and fell.
Does stumble not imply I caught my foot on the rock there?
oh- in that case saying āshe leaves and everyone feels guilty about itā or even āshe leaves and everyone feels responsible for itā work perfectly fine
i don't wanna say they feel like that. let's say they don't know they are the reason. i just wanna say it's their fault. would the second sentence be the right one?
yeah in that case 2nd sentence is right
thanks!
What's the difference between surge and upsurge when both are used as nouns?
Sorry if I sound stupid but does anyone know the difference between ''had'' ''has had'' ''have had''?
They both imply you lost your balance, but tripping is more specific to why
As nouns, they are practically synonyms of each other, but there is a nuance that is hard to notice. āSurgeā emphasises more of a sudden, transient increase/rush while āupsurgeā is more of a sudden strong rise or something becoming stronger.
This is kinda hard but I'll try..
I can not understand. in which cases the ending of the third person in the singular of modal verbs can be done, and when not. since I read that they are not allowed, but at the same time I see examples of what is possible
He swims in the lake every summer
He can swim in the lake every summer
Maria loves inviting people over
Maria should invite people over

hey
can anyone explain the difference between ''i was doing'' and ''i have been doing'' ?
Yes. It means that the person has a very defined physique.
I have a question regarding tense mixing. Like in the following example, is it all right to mix past tense and present tense in the same sentence?
Example: How did he reach the top shelf when he is only six?
Context: Spoken right after an incident where a toddler supposedly fell from the topmost shelf. So the kid was still six right at the time when the line was spoken.
The first sentence is past tense and is no longer a continous action. The second sentence is also in past tense but it's a continuous action, for example:
"I was doing Japanese homework" means that the person did japanese homework in the past and they're not doing it now
"I have been doing Japanese homework" means that the person did japanese homework in the past and is still doing it
This sentence is fine
it makes sense because there are two different ideas just placed in one sentence
thanks for the feedback! š
thank you, then ''have been doing something'' is like I'm doing it from the past to the present and it's not over yetŲ
yes, that is correct
is there a way to 'brute force' reading exercises like how you can do with other exercises? or you just have to practice until you 'get the gist of it'?
Man you are back
You have to get the gist of it
Most you can do is read and if it is hard keep reading
āI have a bachelor in civil engineering and a master in architecture engineeringā
Other ways of saying this in a formal way?
also can someone do me a favor and proofread an email for me? 
yuh
Reading is based on three things: your ability to decode letters and words (how fast you can read), your vocabulary (How many words you know) & your knowledge of the subject matter (the thing you are reading about). Improving any of them will improve your reading, but generally people tend to focus on decoding and vocabulary and forget about expanding their general knowledge of things.
I have completed my Bachelor's degree in civil engineering and have also completed my Master's degree in architectural engineering."
It's already wuite formal unless you want to unnessecarily extend it
hi guys which one can is say?
"please slow down your speaking speed and use simple sentences"
"please slow down your speaking and use simple sentences"
"please slow down your speech and use simple sentences"
?
(ping when reply please, thx!!!)
Last two work best. When u tell someone to slow down u automatically refer to the speed so saying āPlease slow down your speaking speedā is a bit redundant
Tbh Iād rephrase the āPlease slow down your speaking/speechā to āPlease talk slowerā or something
This is definitely more common
And same
I agree with Fenti with the last two but by personal preference, Iād say āPlease talk/speak slower and use simple sentencesā
ohokk thx you guys so much!!
"there's a podcast i used to listen to to practice my english"
is this sentence gramatically correct? cuz there are 2 "to" in a row, so idk if it should be "... listen to for practicing..."
many thanks.
It is grammatically correct even though it repeats the ātoā. The second way is what I would say to avoid that repetition as it is more clearer.

@dusk fossil well, always when you have a modal verb or auxiliary verb the 3rd person verb goes to base form
do you know the modals?
modal is auxiliary, if I'm wrong please check yourself 
or prove to me pleas
no, the auxiliary verbs are "do" and "have", the first is used to form questions and negative statements in the simple present, and the second one is used in different tenses
the modals are just verbs that have no conjugation and always come along with another verb, even implicitly
@tough tide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_modal_verbs
you can read it ?
Modal auxiliary verbs are a type of auxiliary verbs if that's the confusion
š | puppy eyes š leveled up!
" They function as auxiliary verbs: they modify the modality of another verb, which they govern. This verb generally appears as a bare infinitive, although in some definitions, a modal verb can also govern the to-infinitive (as in the case of ought). "
Btw I didn't understand the question you posted prior to this
the issue has already been resolved. Thank you for your trouble
I've watched mrbeast's video and he said: See that crate in the field. Why it's in not on. And where is auxiliary verb and pronoun?
video: train vs giant pit. Time 2:46
I have a question for the learners
š | Parmenides02 leveled up!
ā¹ | Level up messages can be disabled for the guild with owo level disabletext
Don't you guys sometimes feel like you've learned every high-mid frequency word
But then another one pops up
Jesus this language is unending
Learning is a process that will never stop
No matter how much you think you know, you will always find something to learn
The Second Edition of the 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary contains full entries for 171,476 words in current use (and 47,156 obsolete words).
How do i know when to use infinitive or present participle after a verb of sensation in a sentence in the passive voice ?
Can you give an example?
The robbers were seen escaping/ to escape through a window
The use of a present participle implies they were seen while they were in the process of escaping - the observer didn't see the whole action. The infinitive implies they were seen from the beginning of the escaping to the end of the escaping - all throughout the action.
Ok Thanks a lot, it's clear now
š
?
Why is it "in" not "on"? A field is a region that can contain things. Something can be in a field just like it can be in a country or in a bowl or whatever else
It's mainly with sports that you consistently say "on" the field, but that's a different sort of field, a totally flat regular surface as opposed to just some region of land
And where are the auxiliary verb and pronoun? I think you know the answer haha. Nowhere. They're not there. The question really is why they aren't there, which is just because he's speaking conversationally. The person he's talking to knows it's a question by his intonation, and knows who the question is for, so it isn't necessary to include that
When I speak English, I sometimes pause in mid-sentence because speaking too much in English makes me nervous because I might do some awkward stuff, what do I do?
Do you speak quickly?
kinda
yeah, i would try speaking at a slower pace or at a pace that u find is comfortable. ik it can be hard when speaking to others, but thatāll be the best thing. youāll be able to think much more clearer but also have a bit more time to form your ideas
Yeah I'll try
Itās a good habit
Oh cool
I speak US English and know some Aussie accent so I could migrate to either of those countries
Those or these? what's the difference btw
Those - far
These - close
When it comes to countries or something like that
Aight
I would just say those
Thanks I guess
These are examples
what does state means in the name 'The Empire State Building"?
I just feel empire and state in the consequential order are a bit confusing.
The states personal empire building.
I wouldn't recommend getting through the hassle of picking apart the moniker for detailed lexical description. From time to time it's just the way it is. To answer your question, I suppose "state" in this context represents the specific condition the sustenance in question is in? As in "Positive/negative/progressive state"
but in case you really wanna get into the crux of argument or shall we say the person who named this mentality...
What do you think
you donāt need to know the accent to move to a country donāt worry about it
New York is also nicknamed āThe Empire Stateā
you can prob figure out from there
anyway someone probably named it that because it was a state that was (pretty much) an empire
Having exposed to a variety of accents and dialects, I can say with certainty it all boils down to the register/setting you're in. In formal setting, there should be very little differences lexicons and parlances wise. Sure you might find pronunciation of some words a bit off-putting compared with whatever you've been taught or used to OR idiomatic expressions that could take you aback, but overall you should be able to get around just fine.
You're free to dig into some oblique expressions, but like what others said, don't worry about it.
brotha thinks this is a writing exam
apology for the wall of text lol
got a bit carried away
google āGCSE English writing exam paperā then have fun
can anyone explain in a clear way why there's no 'a' before trouble in the expression like
I had trouble doing something
I had trouble connecting to discord
trouble is uncountable?
because before plurals enlgish drops the articles most of the time, like in this case: I had a trouble would literally refer a single trouble... which is kinda weird. Like how you would say: I had problems ā or I have a problem ā
hope that makes sense
Guys I have a question
It's a doubt I've been asking myself ever since I started learning this language
And It's embarassing for me as a intermediate, because it's literally the basics of english
Is It wrong to say "I told him that he was wrong"?
Because I don't understand if "that" needs be put there or not
Hello, I have been thinking about moving to the US or Australia or any other anglophone country and I wanna ask should I take PTE or IELTS?
It's entirely optional there, it'll be correct with or without it
A situation where you do need to worry about whether you can drop it is if it's joining a noun to a clause:
"This is the book (that) I told you about" - correct either way
"This is the book that will help you the most" - necessary here, because book is the subject of the clause that links it to
The problem Is that sometimes this conjunction just didn't feel right
Used in instances like the one I took as an example
Like a conjunction between two clauses, not as a relative pronoun
Idk
It feels wrong for an unexplicable irrational reason
I have the same feeling too, I put that in like "I told him that he's right'', and I'm afraid I would do something stupid like that
Grammar Is not the problem at all, for me at least
Maybe it's just that I'm not used to hearing it
That's why It throws me off
Yes
Alright then
Thanks for the insightful explanation regardless
Pun intended?
About "that"
True
Hey are you a professional teacher by any chance?
That would explain why you're so knowledgeable about grammar
Cool
My favorite part of learning languages Is vocabulary
And especially the etymology of words
unlucky that vietnamese has it very limited lol
I studied greek and latin back in highschool so etymologies make more sense to me
I follow an etymology acc on twitter and it is really nice
At least in english
Because it's an indo-european language
Have a question here I guess
As I said, from time to time I enjoy looking up the etymology of words and that helps me a lot
My method generally speaking Is not "methodical" or academical in any way
Yes, it shares a lot with mandarin in terms of that, I recall. Do you like northern or southern viet more? Or maybe you go for the central? Or everything possible?
Because I simply learn the language by approaching lived-natural forms of media
Like movies, articles, and especially YouTube
In this sense I like to diversify the contexts in which I learn new vocabs
For instance, I sometimes happen to watch recorded trials to kill time
And ofc that teaches me a specific family of words
And expressions
Literature also frequently puts me up against a variety of words I couldn't otherwise learn
Nono
Like videos of trials
Sometimes they're live
I would say my pronounciation is mostly correct if social anxiety and other psychological factors don't come into play
Meaning that if I'm alone I can speak straight up like a Brit
Otherwise my pronounciation and especially my accent are bound to get flawed
Italy
Not specifically
I don't pay attention to what kind of english I'm listening to
I'm more likely to be exposed to american english tho
When I go to YouTube
Let alone if you're an autistic person, like myself
Everything about english is easy to me, comparatitevily
When I think about Japanese and Mandarin, I look back
And I think that english is actually not so hard compared to those languages whose grammatical structures significantly differ from ours
I mean I don't wanna be misinterpreted
Make no mistake
Learning english is a serious business to me
But I feel like there are plenty of languages out there that would be tenfolds harder to learn
Because I'm italian, and that's my native language
German
Definitely
I'm getting my bachelor degree in philosophy in a few weeks, and I'm willing to continue my career in reaserch and academia
as you may know, there were a lot of important german philosophers in the past
I'm kind of fluent in English and yet I'm learning French, not directed to me but still
So german would not only be beneficial for my CV, considering my future expectations, but also essential to understand some philosophical works that are really important for us scholars in such matter
School and stuff, I at first wanted to move to Canada or Switzerland but I see the US, Australia or any anglosphere country which is why I asked should I take PTE or IELTS?
Don't know about France, Belgium or the UK
All philosophers have made some remarkable contributions to the subject, I cannot really choose one
I tried German but eh I kinda didn't like it
It's not like choosing a favorite artist
In philosophy it's different
Especially since I do not plan on moving to Germany or Switzerland
Here's the answer, Don't want to ping the teacher since it could get me in trouble
I'm more interesting in Aus then the US
I don't know to say something else about the US because politics
and I don't want to get into trouble
Kinda hard and complicated
Trust me, most reasonable Americans probably agree that America sucks š
Sure. Plato would be, I think, a really good suggestion for a casual reader
š¤š¤
Well the weather, since I like it sunny most of the time which is why I avoided Canada, the US is good though but Australia is more fun imo
He's not as complicated as Hegel or german idealism
IDK tbh
Another good author for you could be Descartes
And his "Metaphysical Mediations"
Descartes in general is like a decisive step foward in the history of philosophy, just as much as Plato and Aristotle
Aristotle Is the most important of them all, I would say
But I would not suggest It to someone who's not willing to dedicate their entire Life ti philosophy
I don't know about Europe either since a; the far right is on the rise and b; I don't speak many of their lanuagues and it would take a long time to do so
I told a dude I was 12 and he responded with "12 is lunch time", tha heck does it mean?? I'm scared
I guess I'll keep this here to see if people who know about PTE/IELTS can answer I think..
When should I use hyphens in a text?
I use this chart. Can't go wrong with it I'm sure
I see, can you show me an example in a sentence?
Heās saying that at 12:00 PM itās lunch time since it is the usual time people have lunch
āI'm trying to get ahead of framing and in-wall rough-in on the first floor, we have significant weather delays to recoupā
What does getting ahead mean here?
To āget aheadā means to do something in advance or to complete something earlier than the allocated time
When i ask someone "what time is now in your country?" and he/she answer me "15h30"
Anyone know what that mean? Is it 3.30 PM?
i need someone to help me w pronunciation for one word
cuz there is something i donāt understand
For example, I hear a light āFā in the word āInvolvedā, so what is this
ā15h30ā uses the 24-hour system which means 3:30 PM.
Is to storm off a common expression?
I see, thank you @mortal citrus š
I would say itās a useful and common expression to describe something/someone leaving somewhere angrily.
Is this correct?
"She always storms off without a word every time I talk about other girls."
Yes.
is the difference between "to conceal" and "to hide" in conceal implying hiding something specific from someone in specific? or are they interchangeable and i'm tripping
They are interchangeable, but there is a subtle difference. When you conceal something, it implies that you purposefully hide something from someone. When you hide something, you simply put something in a place where it will be harder to discover.
You got the conceal part correct!
can anyone help me anyalse a poem using specs/slims

That's actually pretty funny
What's the difference between these two?
- This is the country where I live in.
- This is the country in which I live.
Idk they have the same meaning
sometimes those structures, by which, in which, at which, on which, etc really confuse me. I have to read it over and over to get fully get the meaning.
where can i learn more about those structures
Prob just by more input of english and seeing when people use each of them
Homeostasis is the biological process by which living organisms maintain a stable internal environment.
This was the one I just read that took me a while to understand
Yeahh honestly i couldnt tell you why "by which" is used, but its definitely correct so i think probably someone else could help you srry
The first is grammatically incorrect because there shouldn't be an 'in' at the end.
Oh i thought it sounded funny
I don't think so
Youāll often see that with processes, youāll use āby whichā or āin whichā. In your example, āby whichā refers to the effect of the process (homeostasis). You can use āin whichā but that would describe what happens in the process. There can be some overlap, but I wouldnāt worry too much about it. Exposing yourself to more English will help with understanding prepositional phrases.
These structures don't have special meanings. You can combine any preposition with "which" and the preposition keeps its normal meaning.
"I live in this country" --> "This is the country in which I live"
"It will happen at that time" --> "That is the time at which it will happen"
"I walked through this tunnel" --> "This is the tunnel through which I walked"
etc
Well, you cannot. It's just not how it works with 'where'. You can't say 'in where I live' for example, so 'where I live in' doesn't work
The difference between "Iāve read" and "I had read" I know that the second one uses only when we are talking about the past, but Present Perfect also uses in the past and more often. I got a bit confused
(means) gerund or infinitive
āI have read + somethingā = I read it in the past and it's relevant now
⢠āI have read this bookā
āI had read + somethingā = I read it in the past of some other event in the past
⢠āI had read the book 2 times before he arrivedā
(means) gerund or infinitive
is there any difference in formality, and when is the structure usually used?
What is the best way to teach this structure to English beginners, besides telling them to expose their selves more to these kind of structures.
I wonder if there's a term for this structure
both are fine, but the 2nd is much more unnatural and dramatic
And the first is ungrammatical
There is not much difference in formality. It is usually portrayed through tone.
Is conjecture a common word?
the first is fine
'..where I live in' ?? How is the 'in' appropriate?
have someone else explain because I canāt find the words to explain it right now, but itās grammatically correct
run it through some grammar checker if you want, but itās correct
As if those were of any use
But they still detected it as an error
That speaks for itself
āThe architect has been sitting on the RFI for a monthā
Does sitting on smth mean waiting for it??
Yeah, some are useless, but 2 of the 4/5 I used detected it
Even that came as a surprise tbh
donāt know what to tell you
It's somewhat formal
Formal writing strongly discourages putting prepositions at the end of phrases, even though there's nothing wrong with doing it, so you see "<prep> which" a lot
Where we'd normally say "that/which ... <prep>"
Like "this is the tunnel (that/which) I walked through" for my last example (optional "that/which")
** It is one of the more common complaints in the workplace, and also one of the most regularly dismissed, has been temperature.** This complaint usually comes from womenāand for a good reason.
apparently the right answer is to keep the bolded portion
AA. NO CHANGE NO CHANGE Correct Answer
BB. Many people have asked the question āHow does temperature affect a workers ability to perform tasks well?
CC. There is a clear link between productivity in the workplace and temperature, and this link should not be ignored.
DD. DELETE the underlined sentence. Your Answer
but because of the 'it is' isn't it grammatically incorrect
hello guys i want ask you, what the difference among confess, acknowledge and admit?
confess is having to say something that youāve been wanting to say or ācome cleanā to, a cliche phrase would be, āto confess my love for you,ā
acknowledge is having known something/understanding what is said
admit is usually having accused of something and finally confessing it. an example of this would be, āadmitting what you did was wrong,ā
What are inferred signals?
Guys what is the difference between war and warfare?
war is an event, warfare is what happens in war
Can you make some examples?
Of how to use these words in sentences
Because the distinction Is not yet clear to me
āI went to war back when I was 20ā
āThe Vietcong were experts in guerrilla warfareā
warfare is an activity of war
What's the difference between WITHOUT and WITH NO?
So warfare is like a style of combat right?
I still don't get it
can be
but itās just the general type of activities that happen in war
no difference
without is more natural though
Please make some sentences as examples
I beat minecraft **without **getting any achievements
How did you open the door without the keys??
I make all my paintings without using references
Yes, He does this with no fear!
I did say that with no regret!
As you can see by yourself if it use "without" is flexible and you can end with a subject or an adverb while "with no" restrict you to use an infinite verb
But they basically mean the same thing, is just that "with no" feels more drammatic
uhmmm got it, make much more sense now, thanks :)
???
hello
Please correct me.
"it's fine, you just need time. the hurt will go through eventually."
the pain will pass eventually is much more concise and less clunky! Try that instead!
but does go through mean the same thing?
Should i write "Under that view", "On that view" or "Upon that view"? I was writing a essay.
go through isn't really a thing pieole say... atkeast not there
il need context before i can answer that!
ok, thank you.
my pleasure!
"Under that view, it is undeniable that the influence potential of colleges in the individual development is enormous."
yeah that's fine. Additionally with that view also works
Does the other two work too?
the word āinsultā is hard me, well the L is hard because is light
So, how can improve that besides practice
or is there something i should know before?
āWe table issues that don't involve the entire team until after the meeting. I want to keep things movingā
Does āto tableā mean āto removeā here??
In this case, ātableā refers to postponing or delaying the issues.
you are right, thanks 
What's the difference between space out and zone out?
There isn't any
Are these questions about English or questions in English about anything?
Make the tip of tongue touch the back of upper front teeth when you say L.
Zone out means more to relax and do nothing. Spaced out is typically when one doesn't know what's happening because they're on drugs for example.
Use 'Spaced out' if you are referring to someone else but not generally about yourself.
sure, thank you

Questions about English
Tabling at a meeting means to provide documented information to that meeting in respond to an agenda item or action and are formally minuted. Issues not on the meeting agenda are dismissed, referred to other groups or deferred until a later meeting, or 'other business' if that's a placeholder on the agenda.
Many a times I simply drop the L tbh
But don't do it unless you're confident about your speech
I replace the l with a nasal touch
Ummm come to a vc, I'll show you
How do I say "I have your children" in English? I need it for a uhh business deal later yes thank you
K it's fine you just need to hear
What sort of business deal is that

lmao there are 20 vc rn
Join 2.8
ight
You would say this like "There are kittens in my basement"
If you want to see them again pay ...
Oh. I was sure he was the one wanting to sell them
Thank you everyone. Very helpful also please don't report me haha 
Good luck with your trades!
You should have said this earlier. š āāļø
@tepid mica did you get it?
Yeah, thanks. So no touching the back of the teeth with the tip of the tongue
It sorta comes out of my nose.....
ur nose can talk
thanks puppy, love for u god bless u
Please don't let yo mind run wild
puppy eyes 
Tbh as a fluent English speaker I tend to drop a lot of syllables and still make sense cunningly
It's just a defence mechanism for every lazy person on this planet
i hear a light āFā from no where in the word Involved
i can do it better now
No. Do do that.
V is actually a bit challenging sometimes when you're speaking in a flow
So yeah it might come out as an f
puppy!!!

eee, im gonna try that, thx
The language ain't as irregular as you think. It's just with millions of speakers coming from various corners of the world, it has simply evolved to sound different
i see
dang i have like 10 years living in the USA, and I learned english with experience and practice, no program
I know the language and I can understand it, but pronunciation is what I wanna improve
That's what gave birth to the various dialects that exist in today's time
It makes sense
Good luck
F has the upper lip slightly forward of the lower lip. No teeth touching tongue.
V has the lower lip slightly forward of the upper lip with upper front teeth resting slightly on back of lower lip.
thanks ;))
i see, thanks Peo
Tbh F and V both originate from the same place(or at least near to same)
The difference is that one is voiced and the other isn't
wdym by that one is voiced and the other isnāt
I'm not very well-versed in phonetics, better to ask someone who does
From what I've heard, your vocal cords need to do work to pronounce a voiced sound, like v
But an unvoiced sound doesn't require your vocal cords to vibrate much
Both are voiced in English (retracted)
So f is unvoiced
I'm sorry but I think 'F' is unvoiced
I might be wrong but yeah....
You are correct with that vocal chords not on the f and used on v
mm?
Mind explaining?
Just agreeing with what you said. You can explain it to yourself.
No, you just confused me there
First you said that both are voiced
Then you negated your sentence here
By your definition of voiced in your statement matches anatomy of vocal chords. My definition was related to hearing the sound verses silent.
I don't think that's my definition? If I'm not too wrong that's what phonetic says as well
Like my balls after my skiing accident. They are two completely different things.
An unvoiced sound and a silent/dropped letter are not the same
I retract my statement
The very first example that comes to my mind is:
[Īø]- unvoiced
[ư]- voiced
Norms?
Bureaucracy... Forms?
Threads*
Forums i meant
Threads, Forums whatever they're called
What is this channel for? Posing the question to be answered in a forum?
Move along
Nothing to see here. 
š
what about spacing out?
Generally means the same. Drugged up, unaware of what's happening around them, rather than just relaxing (zoned out). But zoned out can mean similarly the same as being zoned in on something like a game, so they are zoned out to other things or people. If you tap on the shoulder of someone zoned out, they will zone in on you are be coherent. A spaced out person wouldn't and you probably would not want to be near them.
Spacing out is normally when one is in the process of becoming spaced out.
can spacing out mean like you're daydreaming but you're no thinking or imagining anything.. like being absent-minded, not because drugs or somethin?
can spacing out mean like the definition of zoned out you gave?
I just watched some anime using sub English.
some guy was walking then bumped into someone, then he said, "sorry for spacing out."
Watch out for anime people. They are the worst
what about this.. this is the def i was talking about
why should I watch out for them
daydream about nothing
Easily spaced out
so this isn't wrong?
Yeah you're in some sort of a reverie or might might just be thinking about something or not thinking at all
what about zone out?
is this correct?
chatgpt says synonym for spacing out is zoning out.
There're pretty much the same
Zone out is more like lost in some thought/in a reverie
Space out could be other things as well....
Like for example stupidly thinking about your favourite food(I mean your face looks stupid then)
The nuances of reality and culture will be washed over by automatons. Watch 'I, Robot'
Yeah I kinda agree with that. The key point is not to pay attention to the immediate surroundings
Hahaha
I fear that day might come
@candid gyro just keep this in mind
It just did
ok, thanks
Chatgpt can't tell you about these small things unless they're inputed in their database
And that'll take time
ok
These are the ways we understand the language and such an understanding can not be shared by some artificial intelligence
Ask chat gp how many words it will take to answer this question. Try it a second time and see again.
what question
I use chatgpt once in a blue moon
But have been disappointed the few times I've used it
"how many words it will take for chatgpt to answer this question? "
chatgpt says this.
To answer the question, it took 16 words.
Did it though?
should i send the ss
How many words in the answer
idk
Man vs Machine. Classic
chatgpt only predict next words, so if you ask it again how many words were used by the previous response it should get it right
ok
it says 17
And how many words are actually in the answer?
chatgpt isnt a credible source for english learning
is using chatgpt unreliable to learn English?
why
Someone decided to use it to understand English, but it doesn't tell the whole truth.
well the training data is based on the whole internet
and internet have tons of trolls
and mistakes
Garbage in, garbage out
what about the new one chatgpt 4.. is it the same
Chatgpt is the most stupid thing if you are trying to learn English
It just doesn't know
difference is that gpt4 is a larger model, so it may be able to find errors in itself
like what
Any kind of basjc Grammer rules and sentence structure
the devs curate the training data to some extent, but at the current point we aren't really sure why an autocomplete machine on steroids sounds human
My englush teacher actually tried to use it once and said it was complete garbage
so we can't trust that the text was produced via "human methods"
this is one of the answer
In your sentence, "I like apples, which you brought," the grammar and structure can be identified as follows:
- Subject: "I" (first person singular pronoun)
- Verb: "like" (present tense verb)
- Direct object: "apples" (plural noun)
- Relative clause: "which you brought"
- Pronoun: "which" (relative pronoun)
- Subject: "you" (second person pronoun)
- Verb: "brought" (past tense verb)
The sentence is a compound sentence with a main clause ("I like apples") followed by a relative clause ("which you brought"). The relative clause provides additional information about the apples and is introduced by the relative pronoun "which."
i tried sending a poem it wrote
seems reliable
its not credible
what is credible
error proof
Also the main sentence is incorrect
okay
i made the sentence
Should be "I like the apples you brought
it sounds odd but i think its fine
i like apples, and you happens to have brought them
i just told the chatgpt to identify the structure
It's important to listen to multiple sources of information to get a better unbiased view of information. Once people listen to one source, be that a chat automaton or a single news channel, one's views can be skewed and that can also lead to total unthinking acceptance even if wrong.
It needs the "the"
it could be interpreted this way
maybe it would find the mistakes if i instruct the chatgpt
Yeah but just don't use chatgpt unless you want to fail
chatgpt is better than my English teacher tbh
I get that
But don't trust it too much, use it as a stepping stone and fact check what it says
ok
yes.. that's why i always ask in this discord
to make sure
what question did you ask?
Ok nice
difference between space out and zone out
Same thing tbh
chatgpt said so
space out feels less severe than zone out for some reason
Zone out is just used more often in my opinion
what's the key difference
I think it's because of the z. To me whenever a word has a z it sounds special
what
must be the sharp edges, humans
It could be interpreted as i like apples, and apples are what you brought... Not necessarily sure if i will also like those apples.
Without the "the", the apples brought are not necessarily the same as in the first part of the sentence.
Yeah that also works just seemed more simple to add the "the"
those are two different sentences
If a native English speaker were to take a prepositional grammatical test, would they ace it or would they get some questions wrong?
Probably get most of the questions right, if not all
Could someone explain to me what the differences between below, beneath, under and underneath are?
can "pure" and "sheer" be used interchangeably when meaning "uniquely"? e.g.:
"everything i know is sheer intuition"
"everything i know is pure intuition"
I would say pure
Unless itās super formal i wouldnāt say sheer
i actually barely ever say sheer
ty!
Is obstinate a common word?
i would say no
Iām currently writing a paragraph about how gaming causes aggression whats a good hook to start it (topic sentence) I was thinking of something like a rhetorical question as I want it to sound interesting but idk what rhetorical question to use
"Sheer" means a lot of something
"Pure" means just that thing and nothing else
Both can be used interchangeably to convey the same meaning, but they don't mean the same thing
is there an alternative word that's more common
depends on the question
stubborn?
since it can be used for stubborn or persistent for example
"Cooking. You watch enough of it, you start to want to try it out yourself. Then playing violent games will also do that to you, right?"
you could say strong headed or strong willed
ok
exactly but persistent is also a synonym so it depends on the actualy sentence
thanks
yeah depends on the context
His obstinate stance prompts her to device a way to make her partner become compliant
i am trying to understand the sentence
stubborn i'd say
My teacher told me to do a short topic sentence š
Coz mine was a bit longer than that and sheās like thatās way too long
my paragraph is also appealing to family values and that if u play games u become aggressive which causes u to take ur anger out on ur family
Thatās the main point of the paragraph
Topic is gaming addiction shld be a diagnosable condition
How about
"When the law forbids violence, humans turn to something else to satisfy one of their most basic instincts-video games."
you should make points to agree and contradict it. elaborate why each points you make could be thought about in greater depth.
I feel like that might be a bit to much for school but I lowk like it
Nice topic by the way. I game 16 hours a day and frequently think about murdering people
HAHAHAHA
How tho
My whole essays ab how gaming addiction has the same affects as substance abuse hence we need to make it diagnosable so people can get the help
ah ok
find some sources online and take information from it to back it up if you didnt already plan to
Everythingās like done itās js the editing now
Thank you šš½šš½
no problem!! good luck in passing my friend 
ā portuguese is harder than spanish
ā you think so?
is the response correct? or should it be "do you think so?" or just "you think?"?
depends on the tone of your writing(?) if you want it to be formal it would be "do you think so?" but if it is informal then keep it as "you think so?"
even saying that is quite an open way of answering a question, and if someone were to reply with "you think?" it could be taken sarcastically or not as serious. in the end they are all correct it just relies on how you want it to sound.
keep in mind that the reason this works is because you can drop the first part of some sentences when it's unstressed like "do"
the same thing gets you questions like "you gone there?" to mean the same as "have you gone there?"
(which can be different from "you've gone there?" as a question)
thanks! btw i noticed u didn't start ur answer with "it" ("it depends on..."). is it possible to omit the subject in some cases or how does it work?
if i ask a question like that it means i'm kind of reaffirming what was said, right?
yes, plus it usually sounds a little surprised or like you didn't expect that to be true
that's the exact same process as what happened in your question
You can drop "it" at the very start of a sentence when it's weak, but it doesn't work if you drop it in the middle of a sentence (like "I think doesn't work like that" ā instead of "I think it doesn't work like that" or "how does work?" ā instead of "how does it work?")
you even hear other words like "the" or "a" dropped in the same place ("Thing is..." / "Same guy came up to me and asked...")
this tends to only happen in casual language but it's super common when it does happen
i actually speak like that, but i thought it was gramatically correct. is it? i mean, is it correct to drop those unstressed words at the start of the sentences in a text? as u said it happens in casual language imma assume it's not (?)
It's grammatically correct because it's a regular and normal part of the language
just because it's casual doesn't mean it's wrong, it just means you only normally do it casually
things can become ungrammatical if you do something that isn't a regular part of the language though, like "of my friends went there" instead of "one of my friends went there"
(just to show you can't do this with literally every short word at the start of a sentence)
even in a formal context? (text or speech)
formal ā correct
this process doesn't happen formally, so that means you shouldn't use it formally (or otherwise you'd be using the wrong style)
but since it does happen informally, you're perfectly okay to copy it whenever the style fits it
so that makes it correct but not formal
got it. thanks for the detailed explanation 
I will try to explain, but it may have cultural exceptions.
Under and below are basic informal uses to mean lower than. Almost everything I speak of and write in formal documentation uses below and under. I have rarely used underneath or beneath.
However, beneath and underneath have a meaning of below a surface. But it does not necessarily have to be a horizontal surface. For example "a smuggler had some money beneath his jacket, meaning between his jacket and his body, not been the jacket and the floor". Or "A wall had a coat of red paint underneath the blue paint when we were stripping it back". A wall had some red paint under it may be interpreted as on the floor below the bottom edge of the wall.
Most scales such as temperature, weight would use below.
Under is a positional word to describe where to find something, under the table, but both underneath and beneath work, but are too formal.
I just have a feeling that underneath and beneath may be used a little more in uk as they are old English words and could still possible pervade the older towns and country areas. Similarly new England states of usa. But for modern/international English below and under are fine for most, and consider using the other two words for those subtle positional occasions.
Someone can tell me when I have to add s in verb to a sentence
Like she tells us
Why
30 years ago, no problem. Unfortunately educational standards have been dropping over the decades and the poorer students of each generation end up teaching the future generations. The mix of internet speak into every language in the world means that all languages are losing their pure heritage roots. Sending messages to hundreds of people a day leaves little time to spell out full words or even use prepositions. Spell checkers auto incorrect people words, people leave the grammar to the machines. The only people that understand most language grammar terminology are those learning a foreign language to their own, because that is how one has to explain the matching of grammatical structures. Learning one's own native language doesn't require the grammar, just usage to get it correct. If one is surrounded by people using slang, prepositions and grammar go out the door, and the slang becomes the new language of the area.
So the answer to your question is no. I would put it at about 80% correct in AUS for its reasonable curriculum. 60-70% UK, and 50% of US folks. Esl students 80+% because they want to learn it, however many teachers from English speaking countries living abroad and teaching English are not necessarily qualified, and I've sat in on classes around the world and cringed at what was taught by some of them (see intro reason on teachers).
You add 's' when the verb is perpetual.
"Matt is running" is an action that will stop.
If Matt can/does run, you'd say "Matt Runs."
Example:
"Is the light working?"
"It works."
"Does she shop?"
"She shops."
Does anyone here play computer games.
So when to add the s
When the verb is continuous.
when the subject is singular, you add an s.
Practise some subject-verb agreement exercises to get a hang of it(read up the rules)
Oh
Only for people over 60, but I've rsrely heard it in people under that age.
So someone is keeping the light on. "The light is kept on all night."
Oh I was wrong
Basically third person singular
The light isn't keeping itself on.
"The light is kept on at night."
But if Sarah is keeping the light on...
"Sarah keeps the light on at night."
Yes.
any action that is continuous or happens regularly by a person in third person singular = added s
Oh so John jumps on the floor twice
Yes
Does it correct
Perfect.
Correct.
Sure
I'll be picky and say not really, but it's close enough
More like, "John plays football twice a week"
Your use of the S is correct.
But you should omit "in".
Stubborn will go well in all formal and informal situations and it's well understood.
Urban word you could use 'anal' or 'pigheaded'(less crude)
If it is not continuous or if the subject is plural.
Read up subject very agreement.
When the subject is singular, you add s. If the subject is plural, you don't add s
Or first person singular
He talks a lot.
They talk a lot.
She played once.
She plays regularly.
Of course š
Do you think so? Or 'what do you think? '. Would be better to sound native.
It is casual language. To be spoken only. Any actual attempt to write something should not use it, unless it's just a note to a friend or on the internet. Even reading it here does not look good or even match typical Internet chat.
In written, form placing it into even a basic story would appear uneducated, unless it was quoted text of a casual conversation.
In most cases one should not speak to older people like that either as they will feel the world is already doomed language- wise, or if it's a job interview, you may as well not attend.

Oh and if you are native Spanish or Latin, it is more common to do such words in those languages, moreso than in general English (apart from urban)
It's just straight conjugation of verb tense. I tell, you tell, he/she tells, we tell, they tell. It's just the way of the world. It's the law. It is, it was and always will be, so sayeth the law. Like so many languages, you just have to memorize them. There is no consistent rule. There are always exceptions and different variations and patterns that apply. I am, you are, he/she is,...
It was a rhetorical question.
hello everyone, i'm searching for a native english speaker that could give a little feedback on a presentation i have to do. in exchange i'm willing to help in the same kind of stuff, i'm a native spanish speaker
somebody could help me??ššæ
do you need help with the script or the presentation itself
Sure I'm down
But what's it about?
yo need someone 15-18 that can chats with me
that i can practice with my grammar gets improve
When exactly should i use ON and IN? Like:
There are cups ON the floor
The books ON the table
I'm IN your house
The keys are IN my room
For me, ON is for when something is above anotger thing, and IN is when something is inside something, is this right?
you got it right
Another question, can I use IN instead of INSIDE anythine or are there situations i must use one or another?
Same to ON?
in and on are otherwise pretty different i cant think of any situations where theyāre interchangeable or confused
you can use āinsideā as āinā if you just say āinside of [the blank]ā but inside is more or so used for being inside of a room or something like that
Uhmmm ok I got it, a last thing i would like to know is what you mean with [the blank]?
it just means whatever you want to put there
just a substitute for other examples
np
?define exchange
Definition 1 (verb): exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category
Definition 2 (noun): the act of changing one thing for another thing
Definition 3 (verb): give to, and receive from, one another
Other definitions can be found here
hey
Because I have a lot to talk with him because he same age as me
So we must know the same things
ok thanks.
btw, what does crude mean?
like makeshift or basic
if an axe was made out of a carved stone and wood tied together, itād be crude
i guess in the context youāre looking at it also means rude
As 'a bad idea' said above, it means rude.
By far as I know, "in" is related to inside and "on" is related to on top, may vary. But my question is when you refer to something abstract, like a concept, which one should I use?
Example: " The culture is based (in/on) the symbolic language aspects. "
what am i implying exactly by saying "don't you cry" or "don't you dare"? they have question structures but don't have question marks
hello, i want to make sure of something, can i use this sentence "you could pay after you have your meal". does that sound rude? or should i just use "can" in this sentence?
because afaik could is more polite than can
Is there any difference between these two sentences?
- He's inherently strong.
- He's naturally strong.
Nothing worth noting comes to mind. As a native, they basically say the same thing.
What does "to device"mean here?
"His obstinate stance prompts her to device a way to make her partner become compliant."
Devise means to come up with.. to conjure, to figure out a way....
are devise and device the same thing?
As device..
Like ability(mental thought processes too)
Left up to his own devices he'll blow up the place.
Not exactly.
Devise is a verb
Device is a noun
so is to device wrong there?
āHopefully she finds a new job and performs better than she did in her previous jobā
Is this okay to say?
yup! this is alright to say this, but in my opinion I'd shorten it and say "Hopefully she finds a new job and performs better than her previous one"
When do you say āi can only imagine?ā
When someone tells you something that you have never experienced before, and you want to empathize with their feelings toward it. Usually used in negative contexts, but it can work in some positive ones too
"I was in a car accident the other day."
"I'm sorry to hear that. I can only imagine (how scared you were, how horrible it was)."
"I have the best job in the world. I don't even have to leave my house or anything."
"I can only imagine." (Same meaning as "I want that job too" or "I'm so jealous")
Can you say "predatorial" and if so, what would be the difference between that and "predacious"?
Somebody can explain to me when I have to use has, have, had?
Is the phrase "to bide one's time" commonly used?
What kind of time is being used here "Never seen another girl this perfect"? I confused.
you probably meant *tense, that's the english term for them, other languages often refer to them as "grammar times", while english calls them "grammar tenses"
and that is an example of present perfect, but the author of your sentence skipped "have", which is common during casual speech/in songs/in movies
the original sentence may have been "I have never seen another girl this perfect.", but they skipped "I" and "have", to shorten the sentence, this is not correct in formal writing of course, but in casual speech people do this
Thank you. Got it.
Can sb tell me where I should put a come in this sentence:
'If you chose me for this placement I ensure you that I would use every possibility to benefit from it.'
After the word 'Placement'.
Another tip, I believe 'assure' would be better than 'ensure' in this sentence.
okay ty
Funnily enough it is the idiom of the day! But to explain it in this context, the sender is saying that they will have to postpone whether or not they will be able to do something until further notice, or in this case, until a problem is solved.
It's usually based on. A concept is based on something.
But you may say something like... Parts of the concept can be found in ... (the rules, specifications, syntax etc)
These are not questions they are imperative sentences. This is a command form of English (imperative mood). It's how you make a demand of someone else. More of a command than a request.
Eg
Tell me your name.
Pick up that rubbish.
Sit down.
Leave me alone.
If you actually require payment for the meal, whether that's before or after, you will use 'can'. It's basically giving the option to pay then. Using the word could it's subjective. It gives a sense that you could pay if you want, or not pay at all.
Using can is not rude. It's just normal speech and not interpreted as rude.
Using could in a sentence to another person is like saying... It's up to you if you do something or not. Eg
We are busy now. You could come back later. Meaning it's up to you if you want to come back at all. However in this case using 'can' would be seen as rude, as if you said. "We are busy. You can come back later" is saying, we are inefficient but we are expecting you to come back later whether you want to or not.
Can is used where you are making a convenient suggestion, and could should be used when it's an inconvenient suggestion.
i think i understand it better now, i sometimes confuses can and could, so thank you for your help!
The word device is basically a machine, like your phone, computer, washing machine. It was incorrect to use in the sentence.
It's perfect also.
Has and have are present tense forms of 'to have'. Had is a post tense form of the same verb. Use i have, you have, he/she/it has, they have,.. or past tense i had, you had he/she/it/they had.
For example: i have a drink in my hand presently. I had a burger yesterday. You have a good question.
you probably meant "he/she/it has"
I use it sometimes, but i like to use old English. But i guess i do hear it occasionally with people +25, who may actually like to speak with some experience.
I had my post auto deleted, so i may have made a mistake typing it again. Let me proof it. Thanks
Yes indeed. Thanks
no problem 
Is " A lie was told to them " an incorrect sentence ?
No, it's absolutely correct
Sounds perfect. It is an example of past simple in passive voice
I think the thought of it being incorrect might have appeared due to how ridiculous some of these passive voice sentences sound in other languages, while still being correct in english. For instance, "I was made to wash the car" makes no sense in polish and i bet in a bunch of other languages too, or "She was cheated on" is also kinda weird, but it is all correct
Ok thanks, i think my textbook is just broken lol
Maybe they just want to teach you some medieval english. I would not be surprised if I found out that it used to be incorrect, but like more than three centuries ago.
Lmao, it's probably bc my textbook is almost 30 years old
Way older than me. I should be refering to it per "uncle textbook", and not even question a single thing it tries to teach me. Not sure if I would benefit from listening to it in that case.
I predate that book. What did it say is wrong?
Hi everyone
They were told a lie.. is in active voice
and tbh passive > active for this one
yeah, but what they wrote was the passive
@dense oasis ..
and you are wrong
this is also passive
"Someone told them a lie" is active
ok mb
yes
I'm sorry
the fact that i gave up my helper role does not make me suck lol
finee, am just messing with you
'At 5 o'clock, my car will have been being washed for 3 hours' š
hahaha
fr
I approve of this one
I know you do

Idk there is no explanation
WaaaAAATT??? š
āāļøš
āāļøš
āāļøš«
Why
Take a left turn 3km before the old bridge.
"Can you be our guinea pig?"
Is that sn idiom?
Guinea pig is an idiomatic expression
I would say it's more of a metaphor, than an idiom.
but I guess it's so widely used today it could be considered an idiom
āI'm standing walls in Area Bā
Does that mean heās making walls??
Uh I don't think that sentence is correct
It doesn't make sense
In a building context, that would make sense, depending on the wall type as well. It would most likely be prefabricated concrete, or perhaps timber or metal stud frames. Can't think of any other situations where that sentence made sense.
how should i say if i'm not talking abt someone in specific, but a person? like in:
"one does what he wants"
ig it wouldn't make sense if i used "they" cuz i've started the sentence with "one"
Is minutiae a common word?
no
ok thanks
this is generally fine. ideally you use a gender neutral term when applicable but a gendered pronoun can often make it clear we're talking about a person in the case of generics.
your sentence isn't very unclear or ambiguously referring to an object, though, so I'd use they. not sure why it wouldn't make sense. "one" doesn't have a gender.
firstly i used "one" in the singular, then i thought that using "they" to refer to it again could let the sentence ambiguous in a way i could understand that i'm talking about other people. this way, "one does what they want", sounds like someone does what they [other people i may be talking about] want. same for "he" (in the example i gave), sounding like i'm saying one does what another person wants. cuz of this ambiguity (that i at least saw) i was wondering if natives would talk like that
I think in both cases, the issue is the same, but I don't think it's actually seen ambiguously. Starting with "one," I'm quite certain any native would interpret a relative pronoun as referring back to "one" rather than referencing a different entity there. This is purely based on context, though, and there's several instances where something like "They do what they want." could refer to a different entity in the second "they," but this is mostly a problem in a larger context. I don't think I would avoid this in the spur of the moment, as it's not really on my mind, but the better alternative might be "one does what one wants."
In any case, the revision explicitly references the subject and leaves no ambiguity, but I wouldn't worry about it In a mostly isolated context. Natives aren't too picky with pronoun choice.
so in a formal context could i still use any pronoun? or would "one" be the only acceptable choice?
I don't think there's a better option without changing anything else. Formal texts would prefer a gender neutral term when it can be used, and "one" is gender neutral, denotes a person, and is least ambiguous. I would use it, but I don't think "they" or even "he/she" is off the table. It just can't be wrapped in too much context that'll potentially change its meaning. That's all that really matters.
The sentence might have to change dependent on context in some cases, but that's fine. It's pretty standard to scan for ambiguity in the editing process.
There's almost no ambiguity with it in speech because there's usually an emphasis when referencing an antecedent not immediately obvious.
aight. thanks for explaining 
Drywall
Applied to timber or metal stud
I use one a lot in my chats. It's a bit of an odd form, but i would say... One does what one wants.
One can do what one wants to one's self.
As one wishes.
Is latinus. Is good (not)
The use of the one form in academic papers is not acceptable. I've tried it. Pure standard third person only. It can be very repetitive in a document if used, and therefore should not be used in formal writing. Conversation or conversational text chat is fine, or if writing Proverbs or such verse.
It's a good method when one wishes to advice someone of something without pointing that advice directly at them. For example if you are taking to someone about their drug use, but don't wish to direct an argument at them that they can take offense with... Such as 'you should not take drugs' is deflected with 'one should not take drugs' as it becomes a general statement rather than one directed at the person (you).
^ Academic papers definitely wouldn't use it. You'll see it in philosophical texts and other formal works that are less expressionally binding.
I have lived there since 2001 vs i have been living there since 2001. What is meaning difference?
Sam: āI'll write that down, too, and be sure to get rip rap ordered so it's resolved before your delivery."
Who is the subject of the second sentence? Sam or the person heās talking to?
who would be ordering rip rap?
excuse me but what does it mean? "idiomatic expression"
similar meaning but āi have lived there since 2001ā is better
An idiom basically
okay
There is only one sentence. However the second part, "... And be sure to get the rip rap ordered..." Is ambiguous when written and not in context. Dan is speaking the entire sentence. Sam will write down something.
If emphasis was put on the word 'be', it could become an imperative in which Sam is telling the person he is talking to, to get the rip rap. If the word 'be' is not emphasised it could be a straight conjunction of things Sam will be doing... Writing down something and being sure he himself will order the rip rap. With out inserting 'you be' or 'i'll be' in the message, it will be up to the emphasis on the word 'be' to make the determination of who is the subject.
There is no difference in meaning. The first would be more commonly spoken.
i rlly appreciate you taking the time to give me very detailed answers 
@dense oasis
omg I, I ummm, was busy, and it kinda happened that i actually couldnt ask you what I wanted to, sorry meow
Kk. I'm free now so lmk
hello, is the sentence "there are no places to eat" correct? i thought it should be "there is no place to eat"
" there are no places to eat there except one so-so burger restaurant"
this is the full sentence
Both are correct, just up to personal preference
As long as the verb agrees with the subject
oh i see, then its very easy to use
i might have been overthinking it lol
"There are no place__s__ to eat" - Since the noun (places) is plural, the auxillary verb (are) has to be plural.
"there is no place to eat" - The noun (place) is singular, so the auxillary verb (is) is singular.
Is that not what was said?
?define passion
Definition 1 (noun): any object of warm affection or devotion
Definition 2 (noun): a strong feeling or emotion
Definition 3 (noun): something that is desired intensely
Other definitions can be found here
What is the difference among full, whole and total?
?define assignment
Definition 1 (noun): a duty that you are assigned to perform (especially in the armed forces)
Definition 2 (noun): the act of distributing something to designated places or persons
Definition 3 (noun): the act of putting a person into a non-elective position
Other definitions can be found here
Full would be something that has reached it's maximum capacity... A glass or a stadium. Whole represents the entirety of an object. And total is the sum of parts. Something may be full, but not contain the whole of what it is full of. If i had 1/3 of an apple and added another 1/3 of the apple, the total would be 2/3 but it would not be a whole apple. However 2/3 of a chopped apple may fill (full) a small bowl.
?define cheerfull
:x: That word could not be found in the dictionary.
?define cheerful
Definition 1 (adjective): pleasantly (even unrealistically) optimistic
Definition 2 (adjective): being full of or promoting cheer; having or showing good spirits
?define cheer
Definition 1 (verb): cause (somebody) to feel happier or more cheerful
Definition 2 (verb): become cheerful
Definition 3 (verb): give encouragement to
Other definitions can be found here
@flat rune #šļ½bot-commands please
Can not, can't and cannot are/means the same thing right?
Yup
Prefer cannot and can't tho
how to say "00:06"??? Midnight and 6 minutes???
six minutes after the midnight / six minutes past midnight
same as 10:06 would be "six minutes past ten AM"
THANK!!!!!
Could also say twelve o six
He was bent on quitting his job even though he was making a lot of money.
Is bent on a commonly used phrase?
Not really, never heard this in public before. Nor have I used that in a sentence before.
More likely found in s novel than than real life use. However in Australia, i do hear hellbent used a bit in conversation which is the same derivation and meaning.
Im from the UK and yeah its fairly common. Everyone would know what you meant,
speaking from the south specifically, not sure how common it is up north
Is the word "declutter" a common word?
?define declutter
remove unnecessary items from (an untidy or overcrowded place).
fake it till u make it mean? thanks in advanced
I have one small question for you: I've seen you ask the same type of question recently. Why do you need to know if a word is common or not? So you know which one makes you sound natural or what?
Just a question 
i don't want to use the words that people won't understand and then i need to explain it
want to sound natural maybe be another reason
It means something like, to pretend to be good at something until you're actually good at it (and don't need to pretend anymore)
An example will make it easier to understand:
You get hired as a manager for a restaurant, but you have no experience. You lie to everyone so they don't find out, and do your best to act like a manager. Then one day you realize, oh you're like a real manager now. You don't have to act anymore. You have the same skills and experience as a real manager.
That's fake it till you make it
in advance*
I see I see. Thanks for answering
Thanks it's rlly comprehensive explanation
What does it mean when someone say "that guy plays in the snow"
it means the guy plays in the snow
typically playing in the snow involves snowball fights, making a snowman, sledding, and snow angels
could also mean cocaine
?define cheer
Definition 1 (verb): cause (somebody) to feel happier or more cheerful
Definition 2 (verb): become cheerful
Definition 3 (verb): give encouragement to
Other definitions can be found here
Miss those days
?define lament
Definition 1 (verb): express grief verbally
Definition 2 (verb): regret strongly
Definition 3 (noun): a mournful poem; a lament for the dead
Other definitions can be found here
Guys, "us kids" how come it start with "us" why I find it weird? 
Is it like "me kid" or "you kid"?
It refers to calling yourself and group you may be refering to.
so us = you and you're friends in the subject, or group you are talking to
an example
[my dad and his friends come to say hello and we chat]
My Dad: Oh, us kids were going to go and party tonight!
He is refering to Himself and his friends in a sarcastic tone as "Kids"
in relation to this. "Me kid" is not proper english and should be avoided. "You kid" can be used as an insult or "jest" (teasing) to someone who acts childish or foolish
Thanks, It seems that I'll take some time to understand this one šš
All good
to make it simple
Us kids is grammatically incorrect here btw. It would only be accepted informally since you are using the object pronoun 'us' when it's acting as a subject
I guess in slang and general speech it makes sense
Yeah I agree
But not in any form of writing like essays etc.
yeah ofc, only way I could think of using "us kids" in an essay would be as a quote
š
is the sentence "If he can establish a regular routine, it would make a big difference." correct? i thought with first conditional, it should use present tense
I would use present tense
Bludd
I'd say "If he establishes a regular routine, it will make a big difference."
right?? i knew it
?define cumbersome
Definition 1 (adjective): difficult to handle or use especially because of size or weight
Definition 2 (adjective): not elegant or graceful in expression
?define culmination
Definition 1 (noun): a final climactic stage
Definition 2 (noun): the decisive moment in a novel or play
Definition 3 (noun): a concluding action
Other definitions can be found here
?define omission
Definition 1 (noun): any process whereby sounds or words are left out of spoken words or phrases
Definition 2 (noun): a mistake resulting from neglect
Definition 3 (noun): neglecting to do something; leaving out or passing over something
Other definitions can be found here
?define loan
Definition 1 (noun): a word borrowed from another language; e.g. `blitz' is a German word borrowed into modern English
Definition 2 (verb): give temporarily; let have for a limited time
Definition 3 (noun): the temporary provision of money (usually at interest)
Other definitions can be found here
?define loam
Definition (noun): a rich soil consisting of a mixture of sand and clay and decaying organic materials
?define spathe
Definition (noun): a conspicuous bract surrounding or subtending a spadix or other inflorescence
anyone have an example for the word āspatheā?
Yes, it's used when people want to do a big clean up of junk around the house, office, or even cleaning up a computer disk. Also can declutter the mind, by relaxing a bit and getting offline and thinking about nothing.
ok, thank you.
'Us' is the pronoun, and kid can be described as it's adjective, used to describe 'us', to make it clearer who 'us' is.
It's a very niche and domain-specific word.
Do this in #šļ½bot-commands
Mhm probably not a very common word 
i dont think Iāve ever heard it in conversation so
Guys I cannot really get why "as" is here and what is the point??
I got it from a song
As I wither away, remember my name down the line
What if I say "As I'm withering away, remember my name down the line"
my theory would be that "as i wither away" does not put an emphasis on how quickly it is happening and if it is currently happening right now in this moment, it sounds less dynamic, while "as im withering away" sounds more dynamic, as if the withering was happening right now and it was actually quick, because it is already happening
"as" so like "while"
as i wither away also means it's happening right now though
both mean that it's happening rn
i think, at least
actually, maybe you are right, i'm not too sure anymore
?define unhinged



