#đď˝english-questions
1 messages ¡ Page 36 of 1
What
The English dictionary doesn't stop to amuse me
No itâs the concrete jungles
It's referred to as many things.
Concrete jungle refers to its urbaness in particular.
Where dreams made of
Got a good question of you guys
What is it
Great song.
Yep
How common/frequent have you guys stumbled upon the word "ubiquitous"
jay-z version of the song is the best
Oh, I've seen it.
I have never seen that word
Hahaha
It means common
maybe heard? but just reading nope
It's not ubiquitous at all, though.
In simple Words
Yeah, donât know it đĽ˛
present, appearing, or found everywhere.
"his ubiquitous influence was felt by all the family"
It's a very literate term.
Yes
Sometimes academic.
True
Outside of advanced reading or college education? Doubt you'll see it.
What about ambiguous
Much more common.
Yeah
Yeah heard that
Ambiguous is a very good expressive word
I would say it's almost a top level word. It's one of the first words that comes to mind in context.
That i use in my writing
To describe things that are grey
He gave a very ambiguous answer to my question
(Very unclear answer)
Donât know how to explain it actually
Neither, and we use nor for neither.
Basically if you asked if i feel great or terrible and i say that I feel red
That's an ambiguous answer
And I should be unambiguous to that question
One of the issues with many students in formal essays is ambiguity. It's generally not advised.
The main issue is that arguments should be made wholly, and ambiguity can make a reader doubt your knowledge or research on the topic. A confident writer makes a confident argument.
English teachers definitely pick up on ambiguity.
It's a fun one.
Language is much more lenient than it seems.
There's plenty of different ways to express the same thing with a different tone.
Expressionism is truly fun when mastered
Not having restrictions or blocks, just flowing and floating
I have plenty of blocks. I wish expressionism was that simple.
However, I am the type to proof as I go.
It's really isn't
Not even for natives
Let alone an ESL nobody like me
Some people just let it all flow and clean up the pieces later.

An approach I'm actually trying to convert to
It's not for me. I'm far too caught up on the delivery to confidently move on.
It would be fine, were I to at least write more down before working.
I've been also learning to speak slower to have time to actually be more engaging
Having confidence is truly powerful
Americans actually speak quite fast.
It's seen as confident by most and can be captivating in its own way.
Quality of what you say > quantity
I believe this to be true, and I'm also a slower speaker. It's mainly because I mind what I say and what I think much more before saying it.
It can stall a conversation, though, so many filler words are necessary.
I'm glad you said that
You have one of the most complex instruments in the world - your voice. Yet when was the last time you sat down and learned how to use it to its fullest potential?
The STAGE Workshop is a 2-day immersive experience, where I take you through the foundations of communication and presentation.
stageworkshop.live
Once and for all, learn how to m...
I think that's a helpful video for people with slower speech, for sure. Filler words aren't the save all.
â
You can say hmm only and ONLY if you need time to think firmly about it
I think it's less common in quicker, informal conversation though.
A lot of Americans take pauses as a chance to interject and derail.
It's often infuriating.
If you wanna appear as a very confident person u must drop the umms hmms and you knows
In formal speech? Absolutely.
Yes
Formal, businesses and anything in between
Informality is somewhat irrelevant in this conversation due to how flexible you can be.
It depends. I wouldn't make note of it if I didn't have to consider it.
However i forgot that this is an #đď˝english-questions and I'm sorry for going on a Tangent (Bad habit) if you wanna talk about this more we can move to #đ§ ď˝serious-chat but i barely have any gas left in me so i might just leave it at that.
I think it's fine to leave it at that.
Longer conversations in here usually aren't a problem as long as nobody is being blocked.
Hi, are leaf and leave pronounced in the same way?
Nope!
Theyâre not pronounced the same way
The pronunciation of âleaveâ is extended
Leaf:
Leave:
thanks, for me i can only realize a very very little difference
Yeah itâs the âeeâ sound ainât it, but in most cases even if you pronounce them the same way, people can understand based on the context of your sentences
So donât worry about it too much
thank you good to know lol
What would "knot up" in phrases like "losing has my emotions all knotted up" mean?
It means something like your emotions are jumbled, confused, a mess. You can't clearly tell how you feel but you know it makes you uncomfortable
but why the "up"?
"Knot up" is a phrasal verb, which is a verb combined with a preposition or an adverb.
"Knot up" is similar in meaning to "tie someone (up) in knots" which you can see in the Idioms section: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/knot_1
Definition of knot_1 noun in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
phrasal verbs are often confusing for me
Hello guys! Could you give me advice which sentence is right or more usual?
1 - But weren't you supposed to do that last night?
2 - But wasn't it supposed that you must have done that last night?
Definitely the first one. It's clearer, grammatically correct and is also in active voice, which is always preferred in English
The first one. No negotiations. No second thoughts.
The second one sounds very awkward, has some grammatical mistakes and is kind of a mixture of both active and passive voice
So I'd definitely go with the first one
same honestly, i had to read the second sentence 3 times
reading it makes my brain have a seizure
Wait... Are you sure?
Cuz that one makes no sense whatsoever
Or at least that's the way I see it
No they're saying that they're failing to understand the meaning of the second sentence cuz of the way it's written
||As a joke||
That also happened with me
yeah
its kind of like
its as if you were to eat some chicken nuggets, but for some reason also drink a carton of milk after them, thats how that sentence felt like lol
that just doesnt work well together and could potentially make you nauseous
or eating saltine crackers with orange juice and ice cream
Speakinh from experience?
no, but i saw an old friend do it before
People, stop making the guy feel so bad đ
i meant the sentence not the person, i bet they are a great guy
do you mean âraisedâinstead of âraisâ
in the present tense, people picked up the box. and I tell my friend. that the box was lifted
I am not a native English speaker. I need to learn how to make a passive voice from an active one
what the difference between these two sentences:
"i adore candy factories, and I want to own one someday."
"i adore candy factories and I want to own one someday."
if we analyze that, do that two differ each other?
Example
Active voice: âThe boy picked up the boxâ â> The subject (the boy) performs the action on the object (the box)
Now to to turn it into the passive voice look at how this sentence is constructed from the active voice
Passive voice: âThe box was picked up by the boyâ â> The subject (the box) is now receiving the action and âwas picked upâ is the passive voice. Forming the passive voice uses a form of the verb âbeâ (be, am, is, are, was, were, being, been) followed by the past participle of the main verb.
my assumption is "raise" instead of "rais".
the present verb is RAISE
the past is RAISED.
the continuous is RAISING.
this verb is a regular verb.
Do lots of practice examples to master this
I asked a question. please answer the question
I asked a question. please answer the question
erm..
To me, there isnât a difference aside from the comma
Same idea, the missing comma can mean a different tone (higher intonation) or speed of the sentence. it doesnât take away the meaning
one example is
"the box is being raised by the excavator"
they answered it on the second part of their response
When do I put "the" in the correct place when writing a sentence?
No. I see better. they increase sentences to simplify themselves.
no excavator. I didn't say a word about it
It depends what sentence youâre writing but itâs usually placed at the beginning of a sentence
"The" is kind of article in a sentence
and if youâre talking about a noun, but there are other uses
Youâre misunderstanding the situation a little bit
you misunderstand because I'm asking a question here
I get your question but both people had answered it correctly.
if you didnât understand, ask them in more detail
not
@mint seal I'm asking a question. which means it depends on me whether they understood me and correctly. otherwise you are egocentric
I'm confused
What are you saying ?
iâm also confused
use the when you have already mentioned something in previous sentence. otherwise, the reader will be confused. For example:
"Casablanca is a luxurious neighborhood in this country. the village there mostly costs more than 1 million dollars."
and you can use the, if your reader has already understood the topic you discuss.
"The Earth we live on is the only planet human can live."
@supple holly why are you ticking. the chat does not understand that you need to make a passive voice out of two words, instead they make long sentences, they just make it easier for themselves to decide
?..
You canât make a âpassive voiceâ sentence with just two words
It doesnât work that way
Either your question wasn't clear enough in the first place or you're just choosing to not understand. I think the two answers above were clear
The long sentences they provided has passive voice
THE RULE TO MAKE PASSIVE SENTENCE AS WELL AS PASSIVE VOICE:
be form + past participle
be form members = is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been
@dusk fossil
exmaple:
The child was struck by the car.
@dusk fossil
They example they gave is literally the exact same as this
now you can make it yourself
not
How is it not the same?
if this channel does not make you understand, search it on any browser yourself
then come back here to recheck
because you add nouns, and so on .
but you need the meaning of those words, similarly that conjunctions, prepositions, auxiliary verbs, pronouns are acceptable
"box rais "
in order to say something, you must first understand, you cannot understand that you need to correctly compose a phrase in the passive voice from those words, instead you insert these words into your sentences
@vagrant copper there is one task. grammatically say it in the passive voice

Passive voice could only be applied if someone or something performs an action on the subject.
"he was taken to the hospital"
"The fence is being painted"
not always . I already checked it
Please give me an example
my mistake that the browser Google or Mozilla i use to search for that thing comes to an incorrect answer.
if the noun you mean is like "by people" or somebody, better not to mention it on your sentence, so it would be like:
active sentence: "The people help her to finish her work."
passive: "She was helped to finish her work."
@dusk fossil
"The fence is being painted"
here is an example, it does not indicate who paints
are you talking about something like "I will be finished by 5 o'clock tomorrow" ?
no need to mention by whom she was helped
what?
it is being implied that someone is painting the fence
fence cannot paint itself
@late topaz you said that the proposals should be indicated. I said that it is not obligatory to indicate who performs the action on the object
it is hot here d*amn
I am not asking for examples. I asked how to make that phrase correctly in the passive voice
scroll up above, many people have already helped and given you explanation
not
do not equate your worthlessness with others.
I never said that you should explicitly state who is performing an action but you are correct.
Regardless if thereâs a noun or not, itâs still passive voice
I only meant that you can't use the passive voice if the subject is the one doing something
Please be nice to others.

I know. but the sentences change, itâs hard for me to explain it, but I shouldnât, because you are a native English speaker, you should know how washed away it changes when something else is added. in other cases, itâs not a question, I asked a specific question, itâs already more clear to me, why do I need this
no need to clarify what is passive and active voice. I know. I ask how to correctly compose that phrase grammatically in the passive voice
I did not call the chat here useless, but there was one person here, such
The subject is merely absent in the sentence. It is UNDERSTOOD that someone is doing the job.
For example: The thief was caught.
It is understood that that the thief was caught by the police or other designated officials.
For your example: The fence is being painted.
It is understood that the job is being done by a professional/servant.
This can be done only when we know the subject is very obvious and it would still make sense if it's not mentioned in the sentence
ok you are trolling me. I condemn it.
I know you were talking about that person, thats why i said it wasnât nice.
Here is everything you need
I asked the simplest question. how to make it passive voice - "box rais "
you mean RAISE?
And we said a simple thing that** it's not a sentence** so we can't make it passive
The box was raised
The box is being raised
The box will be raised
etc
it's not good to tell me where to go
I just wanted to clarify where we don't mention the subject in passive voice. There's no wrong in learning extra information than to what you came here for, right?
Well then, take a look at this term as a suggestion
I'm just surprised that native speakers can't connect two words in the passive voice
@dusk fossil here's your answer....
cuz those two words don't make a sentence
your question was wrong to begin with so, it led to a big confusion
! the word RAIS does not exist !
is it possible to make it clear that several people raised, that is, to make it in the plural
Only using the context.
then you'd need to add 'by several people' at the end of the sentence
Russian is a different language with their own rules, you can't do the same things in English as you can in Russian. I sense this plays a significant role in your struggles
THIS
in order for the sentence to exist, you need to write it correctly, which is what I demanded. I didn't create confusion.
âŚ
Let's just say we were not on the same page
Agreed.
do not touch the Russian language. it is out of the question in this context. I asked you a simple question about how to make it into a passive voice
Noeliza let me get a few things straight
Your 'simple question' was very vague and wrong which led to this confusion.
context? from a verb, but if a noun is mentioned, the object that does acts on the object, then in this case it can be in the plural. did I understand correctly?
They did exactly what you asked. Everyone here had wrote their sentences correctly and precisely. The examples you gave followed the same or similar structure to what the others had wrote
You can't expect us to magically read your mind
@serene plinth two words. make it a passive voice. you don't even need to think about what to do -_-
Cuz those 2 words are not a sentence and if it's not a sentence you can't make it passive
No. only one person did it perfectly " JOHN"
stop being so stubborn and try to understand where it went wrong
Not just John, everyone
in order to have a sentence, you need to write it competently, and this is similar
Weâre trying to help you understand why your statement was wrong
was yours competent enough then?
I just see better. I asked a question. I don't like your selfishness. please do not write to me
We are mere English speakers and human beings, we don't work magic here
We can't read your mind via telekinesis
People chill out for a second here
If you want to get a proper answer from this channel from now on, first check whether your question is apprehensible
I don't even get the question
miracles are not needed. there are two words to make this a passive voice, and one person understood how to do it. and other people write their invented sentences where it is easier for them to understand. I don't need simplicity
Just don't... stop right there
Would somebody care to explain?
Ok then let me reword everything. 'Box rais' does not have a passive form. FULL STOP
Guys I would like to request all of you not to drag this any further.
Iâm not being selfish. Youâre not co-operating with us at the moment, which makes everything else harder. Even one of our most trusted English teacher is trying to help you right now
aight then
Please stop the quarrel
Oh I see, that is the question
The thing is, to make the passive voice of a sentence you need a subject, verb and an object
Seeing as your sentence only has two of those, it'd be impossible to make the passive voice of the given sentence
Mujtaba we've already gone over all this
As it does not meet the required condition to make a passive voice
They simply refuse to accept any of our explanations
I wouldn't be surprised if they come up and ask how this answers their original question
Maybe one other person who insists on the same explanation might be enough to change their mind
You never know tho
I didn't call it the passive voice. I asked how to do it, this does not mean that you canât do what you need to create a passive voice. "JOHN" did it and for this I thank him very much.
A man tied two words into a sentence, and here you are making sentences with some kind of locomotives
Wait... I've got a question of my own seeing this whole discussion
What's the passive voice of "write a letter"?
I didn't say you can't do verbs "to be"
because it is necessary for it to be right. and before that, people just made up their long sentences
"Letter is written"
But the original statement was an imperative sentence. Your answer is a statement
So wouldn't that be wrong?
Oh, you mean that's the whole sentence
Then it'd probably be "have a letter written"
nope
the last thing I want is for people to be eating food they dont enjoy.
Where'd that come out of đ
This sentence means that I want the 'people' eating the food they dont like?
@sacred perch a person has come and does not know how to correctly make a specific sentence in the passive voice correctly. and other people write their own compositions.
that's why I'm still surprised at how people teach here
It was a question hehe 
"The last thing I want" means you don't want it to happen
It really sounds like something that occurs often as a result of a habit or an instruction (or a set of). "The recommendation letter is written, then sent to the college admission board where it is decided whether the applicant is worthy of an interview"
We all make mistakes and we're all learning here, so it's quite OK
Then
It means like this: Last thing I want = I dont want people to eat their dislike food?
Ehh what? I didn't have any question
Yes
But I do. It sounds peculiar to me
It means " I want people to eat the whatever food they like, I want them to enjoy themsleves"?
I thought the original question was just putting the phrase "write a letter" to passive, so that's why I said that
Yes
Kinda
Thanks!!!!!
You're wrong....
I was. But I corrected myself
But the statement doesn't contain a subject, so how'd you make it?
and where have you corrected it? I'm sorry but I can't find it
@serene plinth
Wait I think I am mistaken somewhere
that's wrong as well in accordance to standard grammar rules

Why? Instead of only saying why it's wrong, shouldn't you also explain it?
ahh mb
It should be- Let a letter be written.
I'm sorry
In any case, my question still remains the same
Why is "Have a letter written" wrong then
There is the sentence structure for "have/get + something + V3"
umm sorry, but which question?
How'd you make it, considering the fact that it doesn't have an object?
@serene plinth this question
You mean it doesn't have a subject? The hidden subject is "you", as in the listener
The object is "a letter"
Imperative sentences are a special case. They follow a fixed pattern.
I think you've definitely read/heard this famous conversion:
Active: Open the door.
Passive: Let the door be opened.
No, it's missing an object because I'm the subject being spoken to and asked to do the verb. However it lacks an object to whom a letter is to be written to
But because the subject was hidden in the active voice, it'll be hidden in the passive voice as well, since the sentence is also an imperative
I think the only way to turn this sentence into a passive is just changing the verb/the way it's written. The actual subject (you) doesn't change, or else it wouldn't be an imperative anymore
Are you sure you've never heard something like "have my car fixed", the structure I was using earlier?
Huh? You are saying "write a letter" to someone else right?
So the subject should be them, not yourself
But are you sure it's the passive form of the very sentence in active voice you're thinking right now?
But in that case won't you be asking the person you're speaking to, to have the car fixed by someone else?
Whereas, in the imperative form it should be "fix my car"
Well, I was taking it as someone was saying it to me, but you could also take it that way
If it isn't then why would "let a letter be written" be? The verb you're using is "let", the verb I'm using is "have"
"Be written" or "written", neither are passive verbs. They're just forms of verb to make the sentence sound like a passive
Did I just not say that imperative sentences are a special case and they follow a rule?

Honestly, that does sound as though you're telling someone to have it done by someone else
And the rule says that it cannot be "have a letter written"?
Just depends on the context. If they're saying it to you, it could also mean you should get it done
I probably wouldn't have taken it in that sense because it sounds more like you're like you're incapable of doing so, so get someone else to do it for you
Kinda the statement you'd use incase you were in a car accident with someone and you tell them to have the car fixed cuz it's their fault and not yours
Well that seems like the best option here, because "let a letter be written" doesn't sound much different from what I suggested. Let a letter be written by whom? Additionally, the verb "let" itself means you don't have any effect on the object itself
the rule says:
That is just the screenshot of the sentence structure
Then do you expect a clause be written there instead? Like Newton's Laws of Motion?
OK so technically speaking, I'm the one being asked to write the letter. So where in this structure does it indicate that I'm being asked to do the order?
I might be misunderstanding you. You want to change "fix my car", an imperative sentence, into a passive sentence right
Well you said it's the rule. Shouldn't it at least say "the only way to write a passive imperative sentence is to use the following structure"?
Let a letter be written by you. (does that clarify things?)
Yeah, though I took "write a letter" as an example. But yeah, that is what I'm trying to achieve here
Pretty much
If the passive is unclear, that is why people use the active. You can try to change the sentence into a passive or active, but there is a reason they exist separately
Ok, then let's go by this. It is the accepted way of converting an order into passive.
And what does it say about mine
Idk tbh
Then I'm not sure why you were so against it
Touche ig
However if you give an exam on that, don't write your example. The teacher is most likely to mark it down.
It's what I've learned and used all my life without any correction. So I don't think it's that much of a taboo
Correction from other people, of course
Interesting discussion though. I have to go now but would like to continue if possible

ic
Converting an imperative sentence into passive voice involves making changes to the sentence structure to emphasize the action being done to the subject. Here's how you can convert the imperative sentence "Write a letter" into passive voice:Original Imperative Sentence: "Write a letter."Passive Voice Version: "Let a letter be written."In the passive voice version, the focus is on the action of writing the letter rather than on the person performing the action. The structure of the passive voice sentence includes the auxiliary verb "let" followed by the main verb in its past participle form ("written"), and the subject of the original imperative sentence ("a letter") becomes the new subject of the passive voice sentence.
This is what chatgpt said when I asked it the same question
I'd still like to say that 'Have something done' is a special passive construction
Well I guess it's valid. But I wouldn't rely on ChatGPT too much. Just my opinion
it isn't the passive voice of Write a letter
Yeah, ik
I don't use chatgpt

Oh yeah, and it also said that the emphasis of the sentence is on the verb in this case and not the person being asked to do so
Couldn't add that part because of the word limit
I mean... in 'write a letter', you have a verb and an object
so I don't see why it was a confusion on your part.
It's quite obvious that it's '(You) write the letter'.
So I would be the subject and the object
Which was confusing me
object is 'a letter'
OK, that clarifies it greatly
But making the passive voice was a challenge in itself
If you had asked about 'A letter is to be written', I wouldn't have been able to answer maybe
That's when you memorise some things : p
Thanks
explain what?
I just wanted to brag a little about the PDF I found on passive voice
I am pretty sure it covers it whole

My English book has it all as well
I wish I could send a few pictures but I'm too lazy to do that

@late topaz wanna vc?
such a mood
I know I'm asking a stupid unnecessary question, but what would be the passive voice of "go do something" like "go do the dishes"?
I wouldn't mind
man i think i need a better understand of active and passive too
specifically passive
after reading all of that
Tbh
Passive is never used in such cases
And if used then it'd be once in a blue moon
So I wouldn't worry much about it
what cases?
'Go do the dishes'.
Unless you're sitting in school learning active and passive voice like I am

Then again Iâll never get the oppurtunity to learn the names of the grammar rules cuz i dont have time and its pointless
You'll not get such sentences. It has two verbs making it almost impossible to follow the standard rule
It is indeed. I know them as I'm a non-native English speaker
Go do the dishes would be active voice imperative
OK that's kinda understandable, but our school has a peculiar liking to make English unnecessarily difficult, so you never know
But imperative passive voice would be something like: let the dishes be done
Yeah it would
And the passive voice seems be like "Go, let the dishes be done" which sounds very wrong
Yeah, non-natives understand grammar better
Or it simply doesn't have a passive form
But where'd the "go" go?
the go is gone
Go is an intransitive verb. It will never have a passive form
Anyway, I actually don't see anything wrong with the sentence "Go, let the dishes be done" apart from the "done" part.
I'd say "Go, let the dishes be washed"
but that has a different meaning
from "Go and do the dishes"
Yeah lol
That sounds like you're telling the person to go away and let the dishes be done without them
yes
Go, make the dishes done
I think this is the only thing we have in hand to explain our incompetence
is closer
Love it haha
What about that voice chat you wanted by the way?
Nay I'm just bored so looking for ppl to talk

well, I brought my mic
So if we were to replace the "do" with "wash" the sentence would become "go, make the dishes washed"
Sounds kinda magical đ
OK, I'll take it
I would've loved to, but I gtg
Sadly
but the most popular way of saying something grammatically similar would be "Go make your parents proud"
When you don't see a way, you shove the blame on others
Is that passive tho?
The most important lesson I learned is that a sentence can contain more than one voice
I don't think it'd have an active voice in that case
separate clauses can be different voices
But that's impossible... You can't have passive voice but not active voice, can you?
Oo just saw this .. no you can't... Or atleast that's what Ik
Have the dishes done 
I stand by my answer
Where's 'go'?
Hahaha
That was what the entire convo was about
The emphasis of the sentence was never on "go", so it is unnecessary
Interesting
I guess I'll settle for imperative sentences not having a definite way to convert into passive voice, at least without changing or losing its original meaning
It certainly makes it more ambiguous
(You) paint the fence! <- Imperative active. (You) get the fence painted! <- imperative passive
so you need to get the fence painted, but it's not explicitly states that YOU have to do it
Hi, I need a help đ I came across an idiom "in apple-pie order". I understand what that means, but I don't know how to use it. Is the correct sentence "My bullet journal is in apple-pie order." or "I am very good in putting things in apple-pie order." ?
@supple holly sir / mam
What is the difference between
The car has been being washed
The car has been washed
"Has been being" is not wrong, but it's soo old and feels awkward to say
Okay
yeah like as the person above responded, plus here maybe a native would be needed to judge this properly, but the continuous aspect of "the car has been being washed" (thats present perfect continuous with passive voice), makes me understand that as "we do not know if it actually was washed, we know it was just being washed"
cuz continuous tenses do not say the thing was ended
while the example you gave at the bottom is present perfect with passive voice, so definitely the car was actually washed and now its gotta be clean
I am not a native speaker, but I can testify that a native would prefer past continuous "The car was being washed"
yess
Your English is very amazing
Might as well be a native

No 1 will second guess that
What does "round up" mean in "they are rounding up a wheelchair for you"?
they are bringing a wheelchair for you
"Should"sex workers contract an infection,
they tend to"put it down"to "bad luck," says Chiwawa.
"Most of them prioritise making money over the risk."
đ¤ should===if?
đ¤ put it down to=== blame it on?
...
Yes, that is correct
What does a holy foul means?
Could you please provide some context?
John the next english helper
well, I really would like to be, but:
A) I need to build my vocabulary
B) I need to know grammar
C) I am building experience answering questions, because I am searching them online. I do it even if I am sure about something.
but it's all hectic for now
Does this apply for all object or only objects with wheels?
Is there a difference between
He is asleep
He is sleeping?
not foul , itâs âholy foolâ.
well, the phrase "round up" means to 1. arrest 2. gather people, animals or things in one place
which also could be interpreted as bring, if the object is singular
"round up a car for me"
short version: holy fool is someone who behaves in an eccentric manner (mad or stupid), yet marked by inner sanctity. Holy fools are people who are highly spiritual and posess gifts of insight and prophecy. They have profound understanding of life and despite their unusual conduct are quite respected in the society.
Here are some sources I used:
No difference.
asleep is an adjective and sleeping is a present participle ( adjective that was formed from a verb)
Is there a example?
"The great Russian cultural tradition is the matrix of Tarkovsky's mind. In my opinion, Russian notion and Holy fool culture are the two most obvious character of Tarkovsky's movie view."
"Who Is the Holy Fool?
An example of the Holy Fool is in âThe Emperorâs New Clothesâ by Hans Christian Anderson. The king believes that he has a magic outfit that can only be seen by intelligent people. When he walks down the street, no one is willing to admit that the king is naked, for fear that theyâll be called stupid. Only a small child yells out over the crowd, âThe king isnât wearing anything!â The child is a Holy Fool."
By the way, I just came to the realization that the word "fool" is sometimes used with another word or set of words that signify a particular activity to mean "person devoted to something".
for example:
the movie Forrest Gump: "that boy sure is a runnin' fool"
so, the boy is devoted to running
by using that logic we come to the conclusion that the Holy Fool is someone devoted to faith
It's too ambiguous to be viable in an actual conversation.
hi
thanks,but I am afraid I cannot rest. I need to prove to myself that I am worthy of the title
Bro
You english is light years ahead of many people here
I know a lot of words, if you were ask me to define them, I'd be stumped
Its fairy fine
Yeah thank you for being a great person JOHN!
just to ask, how do you be one
i help some family friends speak english so I just wanted to see how well I could translate it with other people
By having a frequent record of being helpful kind and active
kk, thanks

@mental terrace i can see that you're new to server, welcome
And enjoy your stay
thanks again lol!
If i'm active enough...i can be one too?
anyone can be an english helper
The more you contribute to the server the more perks you'll earn

Boosting, helping others, having quality conversations in vc, behaving etc
They'll reward you for being a good member
Of the community
Say I don't feel like joining vcs, do i still have a chance at being a helper?
yes!
there are many oppurtunities, not just vc
okk ty <3
tyvm

That's what happened to me 
Hi, I've got a question on which form of 'be' should be used in "Only you 'be' [something]". Example: is it "Only you 'is' left" or "Only you 'are' left"?
is
it refer to single subject
cmiiw
Kinda tricky but my gut says âare.â
But i dont have a reasonable explanation
the only thing i can say is that, as a native speaker putting âisâ sounds weird
i help some family friends speak english so I just wanted to see how well I could translate it with other people
That is incorrect, the word you is always used with the linking verb are, regardless of the meaning. This might be tricky in some cases like the sentence I just wrote
because I am not actually treating it like a pronoun
and a simple name of something instead
so it will always be:
You are left
@late topaz teach me ur ways
Yeah the whole question is to know what "Only you" is.
I don't know why it sounds like I could use 'is' instead of 'are'...
trust me, it sounds weirder with âisâ
but ofc John provides a valid reason
Only in some cases of informal speech people use IS with you, but I don't see it at all often
ok thank guys.
If I were sure of myself I wouldn't have asked anyway ( đ )
I found it! We form present simple as " subject + verb (-s in 3rd person) + object"
(that was just for the pun)
Oh yeah, I know about that xD. In my example I just found it weird that I my 'ear' seemed to be ok with 'Is' in that case. That's why I was confused and thought it may be an exception like the sentence I wrote just above.
Thanks anyway! Appreciate the help.
In English, the pronoun "you" always goes with plural verbs, so "are" is the correct answer
Oh it was already answered by others
Hi everyone! I want to improve my speaking skills. Does anyone know how I can find a partner to practice with every day?
Hello, there are people available in voice channels every day, you should try talking to them. I am sure you could make a few friends and practice with them later
I have a question to the native speakers.
Thingamajig or thingamabob? Which one do you prefer?
tysm
I say thingymajig/bob
I like them both but I think i use thingymabob more
you?
The second one
i use thingamajig usually but bc itâs kinda long most people just say âthingyâ
thank you all for useful feedback
Can someone help me understand what a word means in context?
"It took me a little more reading of the smaller print for me to realize that it was a patent - and not issued to Tobias Hawthorne. This patent was held by Xander" this is from a book btw
What does "patent" mean here?
I searched for the meaning but it doesnt make sense with this text
a patent is usually a document that officially recognizes patent holder's rights to some intellectual property, e.g an invention, a specific way of doing something, recipe, etc
As far as I know it is the only definion of the word, but I might be uninformed about other definitions and usages
was that helpful?
Yes, I have seen that meaning but before in the text it says that it is in a plaque
Unfortunately I cant send a print of the book here
The full context is like 2 epub pages
then it is probably a copy of the document used as a decorative piece
plaque is a thin piece of metal with something inscribed on it
what exactly is unclear?
You explained it well, I just dont understand it
A plaque usually shows an award right?
So how is a patent in a plaque?

sorry for the bad quality
im using my phone
im on a walk
Thankss. Enjoy your walk
is everything more clear now?
Its still not but Im just dumb so I think I wont understand no matter how many times someone explains.
I wanted to send prints of the whole context but I cant in the group
you can send them to me in DMs
Thank you, really
itâs like an achievement
Don't call yourself that, I am sure you're not dumb. It could be challenging at times to understand what the author had in mind while writing it. Perhaps, you've spent a bit too much time thinking about it.Take a break and come back when you feel your mind is fresh
to show that âthis was my creation!â
if someone were to make a cool invention, they would show that it is theirs by making their patent (The thing that proves that the invention is there) into a plaque (an award or achievement
a bit like a university degree
I understand it now, thanks
Thank you
np!
I think I get it now, its like if someone participated in a competition and they receive a "this person participated in said competition" paper. And they put it on their wall for ppl to see
That paper basically shows that that statement is true
it can mean that yeah
Hi guys
I wish i wasn't going to london next week
I wish she was tidier
Isn't it wrong to use was and wasn't here ?
Should be
I wish she were tidier right?
technically both should be "were", but speakers these days would go with both forms
I see... So if we are talking about casual speaking then we can use both
yes
I wish the n word never existed
Thank you
Hi guys, how to lose the nasal sound?
Äą dont know
Speak from your diaphragm rather than your nose.
But how I can do it?
It takes practice.
Let me post something that might help
If you want to truly learn what it means to speak from your belly then practice daily with Darren's premier 8-week online home training course 'Improve Your Voice' below...
8-WEEK ONLINE VOICE COURSE: https://vocabilities.teachable.com/p/improve-your-voice
PUBLIC SPEAKING MASTERY COURSE: https://vocabilities.teachable.com/p/public-speaking-mas...
Try following this tutorial
Thanks đ
first time that word was useful for me, i thought ill never see "diaphragm" second time in my life lol
i just used it today
it's also a fairly common term in singing
improper positioning and form regarding the diaphragm is typically the folly of any vocalist
sing lying in down? horrible diaphragm movement. instant difference when standing up and letting the diaphragm do as it pleases
but i digress
its also like you speak more confidently when you have your back straight and you are not hunched
i guess at least for me
bad posture puts internal pressure on the thoracic cavity, so that checks out
@bright pulsar @odd oriole you guys have been a tremendous help in this channel â¤ď¸
Thanks as always for helping everyone
And your continous support is drastically appreciated
drastically lol
ur drasticđĽş
U too fenti
Don't laugh at my expression
bruh
guys, im always confused about this, how do you pronounce a noun then with 's, for example boss' or james', do you say it just boss and james, or bosses and jameses?
yes, that's exactly how you pronounce them
uh... which one?
so to make it clear, a sentence like "my boss' watch" , you say it like "my bosses watch"
i know its confusing in written form, i hope you understand what i am asking
I understand, and that's exactly right
"my bosses pen, jameses car."
may be more helpful to see it as a z sound
okay thank you so much for your answer! that problem has been bugging me for so long
@bright pulsar i want your opinion
Chris' and chris's
Which one do you prefer using ?
That's why i asked about yours
Where you from ?
I see, thanks â¤ď¸
oh so both chris' and chris's are correct? i remember reading online chris' is the correct one
The apostrophe without an s is the less accepted form. MLA and AP both recognize "Chris's" but not "Chris'". The Chicago Manual of Style does allow for "Chris'", but the usage of "Chris'" is less conventional in British English.
but you can use both
pretty sure you can also use Chrisâ
really it doesn't matter in anything informal
yeah, I didn't say you couldn't
I'm just pointing out which is more common
the only time it really matters if when you have a style guide you're supposed to adhere to
inferior discord font
fr this is doodoo
It's a pleasure đ
This is usually fine only for proper nouns
Can you say in English 'haevily advertise'?
They advertise a paid subscription heavily in their app.
Heavily?
Yeah you can say that
I personally would prefer placing heavily before advertise(a stylistic choice)
it's somewhat stylistic
Alright, thank you.
there's a genuine reason to most the time

sometimes the sentence can be more difficult to read if the adverb is placed too far from the verb it modifies
"In the overgrown garden, he found, beneath a twisted and gnarled tree, the ancient book surprisingly."
Complex sentences become awkward or difficult to read if an adverb is too far from the verb it modifies, and there's usually a problem with ambiguity if other phrases are added
So, which is better:
To utterly destroy the earth
Or
To destroy the earth utterly?
Personally, I prefer "to utterly destroy the earth"
But I feel like the other version carries more weight/sounds more impactful
the sentence is short so you can use either without really impacting readability. it's stylistic there, but I personally prefer the first. the latter could work fine in a different structure as well, like kim said, for more weight/dramatic delivery
Kim, we have enough evidence. You wanted to utterly destroy the earth all the time. You are going with us.
~ your FBI agents
You're gonna smile like this, but while being held in custody. No parole possible. The sentence will not be suspended.
Sincerely, FBI
ruthless
Megalodon: the superpredator that ate its siblings
in the womb
đ¤ they would eat their siblings while they are still in their mother's belly before they are born?
((megalodon is an extinct species of shark, half the size of a whale) )
Yes. That's a typical shark's behavior, not just a megalodon's, if I remember right
nature is savage
like mate stop procrastinating
What it means
Nature is metal 
r/
it means stop spending time on entertainment, rather than achieving your goals
do some work
we all need to đ
Ty
đ
can you use fragrant in a sentence like "You are so fragrant"?
I dont think so. I dont know exactly how to explain but I dont think so
Im not an expert so lets just wait for the fluent and native ppl to say something
not really, it sounds really unnatural
if you wanna say that someone smells nice just say âYou smell goodâ because fragrant is a more specific word ive seen used more for objects that smell good rather than people that smell good
If you mean to say that someone has a pleasant smell, you can say "You smell good".
And if you want to use the word 'fragrant' in a sentence, you can say "I love the smell of your fragrant hair".
btw you can use the word âreallyâ rather than âsoâ in most cases like this, itâs what most people would rather hear
Hi ! how should i use " ain't" ?
âis notâ informally
âThat ainât goodâ
'ain't' is a contraction word of (am not, are not, is not) it is basically a negative. You can say "I ain't coming to the party"
"Ain't" is a replacement for "isn't", "aren't", "am not", "have not", "has not".
You can replace these statements with one you mentioned, for example:
Isn't she coming to babysit your sister today? -> Ain't she coming to babysit your sister today?
We are not going to listen to you. -> We ain't gonna listen to you.
I am not into people like you. -> I ain't into people like you.
He hasn't got any money. -> He ain't got no money.
It sounds very short and not very proper to some people, for example to me it kinda reminds me of slang used by afro-americans in movies, or in rap, so it is not really a clear and nice way of speaking.
but despite all that, people use it
itâs used in AAVE and southern US dialect
ah yeah
ok, thanks y'all
why aren't you guys talking ? is this right
Yes
what about this
why you guys aren't talking?
â
A very common phrase in this server lol
aren't needs to be before you so the sentence becomes a question (could you explain this please)
this isnât
âwhy you guys arenâtâ isnât right
yes that's right thank you man
It is correct, just depending on the context
it isnât correct in any context
itâs literally just wrong
Why ?
it's wrong
âWhy moxy is not talking?â
aren't always before you
âWhy he isnât talkingâ
ok this is sometimes correct but the first one isnât
youâre missing an âareâ or âisâ before âyou guysâ
there is only one single scenario where it can be correct but itâs a really far stretch so
.
a single situation thatâs not very common isnât right to say that it can be correct based on context without saying the only context it can be used in
why did you react with true to my wrong message
âThe group lost receptionâ
â(Is that) why you guys arenât talking?â
itâs only correct in like that scenario
but even then thatâs wayy too niche to say itâs correct
exactly thank you for the explanation
np

its wrong

same as "thats what I mean", you dont use present continuous here
this is also incorrect, you do not use "why" after hence
but you could say "Hence this is why I said so"
but this is not what was said
you do
what he said is correct

@mental terrace https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/19/hence-why/
well, I don't know much about anything
You are also wrong
but it seems to me that a professor from Washington State University would be right
Shakespeare and the Bible keep alive one meaning of the old word âhenceâ: âaway from hereâ (âget thee henceâ). Thereâs no need to add âfromâ to the word, though you often see âfrom henceâ in pretentious writing, and itâs not likely to bother many readers.
But another sense of the word âhenceâ (âthereforeâ) causes more trouble because writers often add âwhyâ to it: âI got tired of mowing the lawn, hence why I bought the goat.â âHenceâ and âwhyâ serve the same function in a sentence like this; use just one or the other, not both: âhence I bought the goatâ or âthatâs why I bought the goat.â```
ive used âhence, whyâ more times than I can count
Then you were wrong and you are wrong
On the other hand, https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/79673/hence-and-hence-why
and it can also be interpreted as
âTherefore (itâs) why youâre wrongâ
The phrase "hence why" has a long record of usage in literary works
After reading the various replies my mind is still inconclusive, however, the above answer: "incorrect, but nobody cares" seems to fit best.
I have always thought of 'hence' to be a word used in written communications in order to be succinct and formal, so when I hear people using the term 'hence why' in casual spoken conversation it really irritates me for some reason. It is probably due to the fact that the people saying 'hence why' are usually not very well educated people trying to sound important or clever.
Lately, I have even heard journalists and politicians saying 'hence why'. It appears they are using it as a synonymn for 'so' or 'therefore'. I quote this recent example from a political journalist:
"...both parties are free to set their own policies and priorities, hence why this story has been running in the past few days."```
I'm just personally too used to saying hence why, idc if it's right or wrong, as long as people understand what im conveying
"...both parties are free to set their own policies and priorities, therefore this story has been running in the past few days."
Although, adding 'why' to 'therefore' does not make sense:
"...both parties are free to set their own policies and priorities, therefore why this story has been running in the past few days."
Alas dear fellows, it is quite infuriating, hence now I must go hence in bitterness, in debt to your mercy.```
itâs quite similar to this actually
natives know what youâre saying so itâs gradually just going to become the normal and then correct phrase
languages are flexible
natives also know what am saying when i say "that are a apple", but it does not become the norm

but many people are not saying that
look, what is a norm, but something found in abundance?
many people are saying âhence whyâ
English questions
English arguments 
i havent met them, but i guess you must be correct
it would be correct is most English speakers were to use that yes
if*
like âgottaâ
or âainâtâ
ain't no one's gonna say that
languages change, so this is an example of that
sleep well
Did you assume his activity ?
it's 5pm in greece and 10 am in the eastern US

You said "sleep" well
a good afternoon nap after arguing about something unimportant
Honestly unnecessary arguments > politics economy
And you literally have a cursed nickname lol
Black cat is quite argumentative at times lol
I just like to mess with you
mine has grown +2800 in the last year
I feel a bit overwhelmed
word list
the words that you either don't know or cannot define well
i also meant word list, most of them i know by now tho lol
I am bad at practicing what I preach
You should try to be a priest maybe
what's drawl?
Closest word to drawl that i know is drool
what's the difference between brooch and broach?
exalt \ exult ?
I don't know
đŚ
Yeah, Moxy help us all
Even as a native Iâve never heard of âexultâ đ (not denying that it exists)
Oh this one ive seen, am not saying i remember it tho lmfaoo
Hey but you know what John
It actually makes sense, think about this, exultation
what's the difference between hunching and slouching?
i would send you mine but that'd be .apkg plus i dont even wanna try cuz thats too large of a file lol
they are the opposites maybe
I havenât heard hunching before
it sounds familiar but
but you must
yeah Iâve heard that
have heard of the phrase "I have a hunch"
natives are wild sometimes
yeah one of the em words with 2 meanings
having a hunch is completely different then hunching forwards
a hunch is like âI got a feelingâ kinda
either way, I only have 7 years to hone my english skills to perfection
thank you
if I think like âyo that alley is suspiciousâ then itâd be a hunch to not go there
you're already perfect what do you mean...
John make me perfect
hunched (forwards) is where youâre leaning forwards, like crawling through a tight space
slouch is like sitting down with shit posture
A bad idea, what would you say about:
tilt forwards, lean forwards, slant forwards
are these correct
lean forwards is off but rest are ok
bye again
Yeah i guess it should maybe be like "lean towards" or something
Your naps are very short. But I hope you can get better at them. Good luck
they're power naps
10-30 minutes
English hurts my brain
no, last one took them like... a minute or two, i wish i was able to nap that quickly
I think there's a condition that allows you to fall asleep instantly
I wish I had that
it's 1am here
in Australia
Yes, but I do not like the idea of being smashed with a floor board right into my temple, or nape, or head, or forehead, or whenever possible, and then napping for few hours if it goes correctly, but napping for few eternities if it goes wrong
but they ride kangaroos to bend the time
timezones in australia be like:
Kiu can I have a question, chances are it will not be too intelligent
Wait I'm confused, have?
What sort?
John you kinda felt my spirit in that deleted message. But my question was actually supposed to be if they have ever ridden a kangaroo.
Have you, Kiu?
liar
I know more about my Chinese culture than Aussie...tbf
are you chinese too?
like i sound weird here cuz am not myself, but my implication was that "are you both"
yeah
mhm
i dont understand how mixed races work cuz they confuse me a lot but technically my nationality is Australian but my ethnicity is Chinese
me?
vm
n
nvm
LMAO
Yeah, but we can not help the fact that english became lingua franca just cuz its natives killed the most people, lol
I don't know what it means
have you ever seen "Rudolph's Shiny New Year" from 1976?
What languages do you speak then
Except for kangaroo english
Cantonese, a little bit of Mandarin and Japanese
and Music
you speak music?
is that a metaphor that your english is like music to people's ears?
I want to speak so many east asian languages too. But my skills are limited to japanese that was once N3, and now is a random mess of legacy thoughts with a bit of absolutely incorrect pitch accent
Nah I'm talking literally
God give me time
It's fine, take your time and you'll be really good at those languages again
you have all the time in the world
Thank you, John. I have always been convinced that you were the God.
well first id need to make my english usable, now its weird
now its like a radioactive waste from all the nuclear reactions inside of nuclear power plants
your english is sublime
The statement requires proofing.
okay, this is british slang, so took me a bit:
So that is an annoyed person.
no, you were correct to assume it meant "a nasty person"
I learn british english
the image above says "a man that you are annoyed with"
Is it your habit to annoy people?
No, but if it is yours,then do not mess with me. I can defend myself with my boiii, the bear!


