#šļ½english-questions
1 messages Ā· Page 33 of 1
not that they spell them not correct, its on purpose but you knew that
I once did it on purpose and a beginner corrected me
š
you like roasting me dont you lol
lol
That's quite offensive....
Jk lol
I was in a bad mood that time so I was kinda pissed for a bit
they wanted to have their moment for a fraction of time, and you gave them their time to shine
so kind
I usually just avoid provocative people
i ignored them
if you want a general idea of how to structure then theyāre still good but yes not 100%
same
If we were to separate slangs, yeah
Lmao
There's a word my brain just doesn't want to understand for some reason no matter how many ppl try to explain it
It's so weird
what is itš±
i can change that
hehe
it's fine, no reason to be offended by someone trying to help
Oh my
Not againš
I know...
Yes
I can tolerate loud noiseš¤
My tolerance to loud noises is good
not sure but i keep things short and quick, at least thats my imagination, when i type comments like on discord and i really do not care about them being perfect that much, if i were to speak formally or something then i see myself how flawed my comments would sound lmao
Yes
OHHH WAIT
Oh shoot... i forgot to bring an apple
thats not so surprising, the most surprising was when i saw they put learning thai in the profile description here

Australia :))
Oh okay
8:33 am
almost school
because, why would anyone study thai?
I have english 24/7 period
nice
do you read books ?
I hate books
Books are overrated
BAHDHSHD
books are underrated
Ty
I'm underrated
you're authentic
Authentic English
Not enough
Or is it C4
thailand nice
yeah i mean i actually did not mean to mock you, the truth is i love asian languages as well, but i have no time for learning them, i used to learn japanese and i almost passed N3, but i resigned and not even attempted because i realized it took too much of my time and i really just cant do too many things
no clue lmfao
nice
Damn
I kinda wanna take an iltes exam
But i have no real use for it if i were to take it
Expect for..bragging about it online
i didnt take the official jlpt, i was about to sign up, but eventually i did not pay the fee so i just, did not even take it, even though i guess it was possible for me to really pass that one
I wonder if reaching C2 is very "impactful" lol
I feel like very few people in the whole world actually are C2
not really prioritizing english only, i have a lot going in my life, and i worry a lot about my career and my living, like money in particular, so i just study programming and english, because i know there's like, nothing i can do except for these two things to improve my living, and japanese is a terrible choice when it comes to being useful in my region
like if i didnt worry that much then sure i wouldnt have even given up on japanese, but i already did so, maybe gonna continue in the future, or just drop it forever and start korean, anyway these considerations are very unrealistic for the present moment
Basically when u are C2 u are taking the language academically
Oh nice
C2 level of English is essentially a native level. It allows for reading and writing of any type on any subject, nuanced expression of emotions and opinions, and active participation in any academic or professional setting.
The last bit is essentially the core description for it
sounds a bit... odd, like i bet there is a ton of natives who are not C2
nuancedš±
C1-C2
i love that word
it leaves us with many questions i think, would C2 speaker be able to read the english version of the bible and not struggle? would they understand technical language in programming or any other profession thats packed with unusual terminology? idk...
ive probably used it like 50 times in my essays
It's a very good word lol
In writing
š¤
hi, is "ive finished it a while ago"correct? or should it be "i finished it a while ago"?
Nah. Profession jargon definitely isn't part of the specification.
both are correct
iirc you use have when you dont specify when its finished right??
C2 means u understand "English" programming and any other subjects are different
They can learn HOW to program
I finished it a while ago
past simple
well i can too, and am doing it, despite not being c2
only in english
.. ignore this
thats past simple tho
C2 has nothing to do with professional jargon.
i did a very good job of ignoring it
U did
okay thank you
no problemo
Idk why but B2 C1 C2 are vastly different
The amount of effort u gotta put into it is crazy
Jumping from B2 to C1 is basically a HUUUUUGE jump a very drastic 1
Me with french
like i can say "Flatpacks got broken on my arch, i hate rolling release distros, even if i used them since i installed my first debian-based distro two years ago"
im just stuck
B2 pleatu is a real problem
and C2 speaker would have no clue what i mean
It is
I was only able to escape it
By forcing myself to saying thats in not comfortable saying
And saving words that are useful in specific scenarios
Do ask me why i have some of them saved lol
i learned "clingy" the hard way
Yeah

No
"Recklessness
No
What's the difference
repulsive ā> extremely unpleasant
impulsive ā> acting without thought
omg surreal
Unpleasant as in
like ew
i just need to stare at this chart for a good 30 minutes
Would u describe impulsive people as reckless ?
I'm bad at grammar
I rather waste my time learning what "repulsive" mean, than learning grammar
Bc the school system failed me
Lmao
All of us
Please help im in math class
Pay attention
I hate math so muchš
I got B in math
Lol
When i usually get A+ in other subjects
No
Your sentence wasn't very native
Well if you were born in an English speaking country and grew up speaking it then what would make you question you being a native speaker?
Lol hard to type sarcasm I guess haha
what is to catch up on?
Iām trying to think of a way to explain catch up on without using catch up
to update yourself on
could you use it in a sentence pls
I need to catch up on the news because I havenāt watched it in a week
^^
Basically keep up with
And this one?
My friend and I went to a restaurant together to catch up on news since we have not seen for a long
On THE
The last bit of what u said needs improving
are you really playing overwatch at the same time that you are answering the questions?
Lmao
If you are meeting each other to catch up on the actual news, like on the television, use ātheā if not you can omit it and add āsomeā and it would have the meaning āto catch up on each other, sharing events etcā
So depends on what you want to say
like to catch up on each other news, because we have not seen each other for a long time
add āeach otherā after seen
how
Yeah donāt use ātheā
Although I would omit news all together in that sentence and say catch up with each other as opposed to catch up with the news
Yep
My friend and I went to a restaurant together to catch up since we havenāt seen each other in a while, is how I would say it
Thatās a nice way to see it
say*
@queen wyvern If u really want to include ānewsā say āsomeā before it not ātheā
That's a very coherent sentence
Wow
š Thanks
so im 18 and in two months ill be graduating
so do you guys have any advice of what to do? im thinking of pursing work then drop out to school
i have a sentence written as follows:
This kind of policy can't be removed without making the sentence unclear or significantly changing its meaning.
Sometimes, I know the meaning of this one, but I don't know what the name of this structure of sentence is. Please, I need your favor here
thanks
The grammatical name of this sentence is called a ācompound sentenceā. The āorā is a coordinating conjunction that makes up this type of sentence as it connects two clauses together which should be preceded by a comma.
i hate commas lmao
Restrictive/essential clause is the type of clause that makes the sentence unclear or changes the meaning when removed.
okay let me browse it
What's a clause ? I know it's related to grammar and or within that
But i forgot
A clause is a group of words that contains a subject and a verb that have a relationship
Clauses contain both a verb and a subject. They could be complete on their own or require additional context to make sense. There's two categories: independent and dependent clauses. Independent clauses are complete on their own and dependent clauses are not. Relative clauses (like the restrictive clause) are a type of dependent clause.
Restrictive vs non-restrictive can help you distinguish between using āthatā and āwhichā in a sentenceš
That sentence which was
Nothing
guys i have another question. It is about restrictive appositive (which is also known as essential appositive).
His car Ford is being fixed.
Could I conclude that he has more than one car?
Or it just tells the car we are talking about?
Thanks
Ford like the brand of car?
But to answer your question, that sentence does not imply that he has more than one car, the sentence is merely specifying that the car that is being fixed is his and is a Ford
V-8s optional frfr
This example is a little faulty because the exact sentence you used isn't natural to me: if he had one car then I would've said his car, a Ford, ... and if he had multiple then I would've said his car, the Ford, ... or one of his cars, a/the Ford, ...
but as you have it written now it sounds like Ford is a name he gave to his car, not the brand name
(because there's no article before it)
okay okay, the previous was my mistake. Now, the example is fresh from the website.
"The popular search engine Google receives more than 8.5 billion searches a day."
Can we take a conclusion that because there are many search engines exist today and the sentence only refer to the Google itself?
this website i visited
Yes because there are several āpopular search enginesā google is added into the sentence to specify that it is referring to Google
does the rule also work when talking about specific areas, like
"The female student Anna is 18 years old now."
I do this because there must be more than one female student.
Yes that is correct
oh okay
i was confused because the website told me that restrictive appositive is possible to indicate the quantity of something or someone, but the chatgpt said the opposite.
bro i meant not the example, but the conclusion i had
Yes I was saying that your conclusion was correct
Be careful with using Chatgpt, it may not always be correct. Sometimes it says things that donāt make sense.
okay bro. i totally get your point
Have you had any bad experiences ?
chatgpt is an extremely unreliable source of information, there is a ton of good reasons why a lot of companies banned their employees from using it
maybe it mines out the most general info in a good way, but when its asked more technical questions, about some specific topics, then it oftens suggests obsolete information, and later, asked about the same thing again, reflects upon the mistake, but thats too late if someone trusted it from the first response
it can't really make sure that what it says is 100% reliable, like it was trained based on a ton of data, but it has no way of filtering literally every single thing and being sure it provides whats really true
Agreed. I still can't believe why people use it so religiously. I've seen some people use it to ask about their English questions, like is this sentence valid or how this grammar point works; even though Google exists and at least with that you get more choice on which source you want to use
ohhhhhh thx so much for the explanation!! 
How can I learn phrasal verbs and idioms or other expressions?
Why we donāt use infinitive verbs with some auxiliary verbs?
I can go
why not āI can to goā?
In Bulgarian which is also info European langue equivalent of ātoā is used with all. Why we stopped to use it in English?
I can (to) go
I should (to) go
I must (to) go
How to learn is subjective to the person, where to learn is a different story
Huh? English is English, Bulgarian is Bulgarian. Why would they follow the other's grammar rules? 
If you're asking why English is the way it is, well, it's just the way it is. They didn't stop using infinitive verb with aux verbs, they never used it in the first place
There's no 1 absolute method of doing it
āIt is what it isā is not enough for me. Why they didnāt use āin the first placeā? I wonder that. Is there some kind of logic behind it?
im interested in the different story
Well
Literally go to google and type phrasal verbs and or idioms, and learn whichever one you like, and u can ask us if they're a good one
Or alternatively
U can use these channels
Maybe if you use an ouija board and ask the creators, yeah. Your question is like asking why does 1+1=2. It's just how basic math works, just like how English grammar is with the grammar rules. Just like how all languages work
I could ask you the same why Bulgarian uses "to verb" instead of its bare form. What would the "to" really add to the sentence
Uniqueness

They're probably asking about something that's more technical, like the history of it or something, or how they've concluded that 1+1=2 (which is basically an easy logic to understand)
1 = single body 2 = double bodies
Single body + single body = 2 bodies
Thatās another good question.
We donāt need that board. Sumerians have invented writing. We can read what our ancestors wrote and learn about them. Also languages are not mathematical. They are not natural. We made them up. It is normal to wonder why we made up some parts like how they are.
I can even ask why 1+1 is 2. I can wonder what I want,
If you donāt know the answer or if you donāt want to answer you can skip to answer it.
I think my answer was already clear
To be fair you just said that they are the way they are, which is not a very "informative" answer.
I don't mean to take sides, just being objective lol
Not everything has to have a definite answer. It's like asking why the word question is written as question. Is there any specific rule to it? Any reason why it must be written like that? No, not really
Why do English have that number of verb forms while other languages have more/less? Maybe it's simply because they just wanted it to be that way. So that's the same with how infinitive verbs are used. They set clear rules about when and how it's used, but there isn't any real reasoning behind it
So you're saying since we live we don't to question why we're living, it's just the way it is ?
I think you misunderstood the point I was making
I think living and a grammar rule are two very different subjects
Not trying to argue with you, just trying to understand the logic of what you said
They are 2 different subjects, needless to say but, if we go by that logic that you just said it can mean what i just said
I said "not everything has to have a definite answer". I didn't say "nothing has a definite answer"
Uhuh
Anyway my question has fall behind.
Why we donāt use infinitive verbs with some auxiliary verbs?
I can go
why not āI can to goā?
In Bulgarian which is also indo European langue equivalent of ātoā is used with all. Why we stopped to use it in English?
I can (to) go
I should (to) go
I must (to) go
I don't think anyone here that's online rn has the answer to that question since they need to know the history behind it
You can search in books that talks about the history of languages to know your answer
I have searched google and couldnāt find. I think I need a key word or key phrase for better search.
Maybe someone knows. I have just asked maybe someone who knows see my question.
I honestly doubt that, but I'm not speaking for everyone, just saying my guess.
I personally can't answer that question because I'm not into history or majored in linguistics
So, sorry.
This is why I don't think English learners should focus on learning grammar like this. Even I, as an advanced native speaker, have no idea what stuff like infinitive verbs or auxiliary verbs are.
My point being that you do not have to know what an auxiliary verb is and why you cannot use it with an infinitive verb to be fluent.
but you'll need to know what they are if you're aiming for a high score on an exam, which could affect your job or immigration, so it just depends on what people are studying English for
Eh, perhaps, but perhaps not. I'm only a 17-year-old high school student but through various tests I've found that I have the English proficiency of a college student. Plus I've always gotten excellent scores on English ACT tests, which are entrance examinations to admit you to a college or university. Yet I still have never worried about what an auxiliary verb is.
"Advanced native speaker"
That gave me anxiety reading it
Sounds very technical and scary
I say that I am an advanced native speaker because, believe it or not, you can have a poor English proficiency level even being a native speaker. So, I say that because I am a native speaker and I'm also very competent with speaking and using it.
It's only useful in an academic setting
Tbh
Like why would u learn about chemicals if you're not gonna be an alchemist for example, sure it's good information but not "essential"
Yes i know what you're saying
Natives doesn't = good English necessarily
No, I don't think so. I tend to have a much more rich vocabulary than most people my age and it's been very useful for allowing myself to have conversations and express myself and convey my thoughts clearly and succinctly. There are more benefits to having a high English literacy rate other than just in the academic world.
But, you're talking about being very expressive, I'm talking about knowing terms that are too technical
I donāt wonder because itās necessary. I donāt even study English. I study Bulgarian and saw that difference and wondered why. I like to learn this kind of details. I like to study about this kind of details. It gives me joy.
There's a difference between learning things that are too technical for the average person and too expressivs and rich.
Oh, I see. So in that case, you have backed up what I've been saying. Why would you learn what auxiliary verbs are if you're not going to be an English professor? Sure, it's good information, but not "essential."
Also understanding logics of something helps you a lot when you learn or teach.
Yes im on ur side lol
Why waste time/energy into learning something that's not useful SUBJECTIVELY to you
I'm not gonna be an English teacher so why should learn what "clause" is for example.
If learning the word "clause' gonna increase my english score in tests then yeah, it's worth it
Other than that it's not
That's my take on this whole topic of importance
The preposition ātoā is omitted after modal verbs like can and should because it lost its prepositional status in the English language. In Old English, the ātoā has always been omitted just like in Modern English. The modal auxiliary + infinitive constructions omit it except for āoughtā.
Example:
Ic canne rune writan ā> I can write runesā (Rune = ancient Germanic letter)
As seen in the Old English example, āwritanā is the infinitive and doesnāt require the ātoā, it is simply placed after ācanneā (can) but with the direct object in front of ācanneā which is āruneā. This is still the exact same in English except we place the direct object after the infinitive āI can write runesā but that doesnāt concern the infinitive. Hopefully this helps.
hi whats the question
Why we donāt use infinitive verbs with some auxiliary verbs?
I can go
why not āI can to goā?
In Bulgarian which is also indo European langue equivalent of ātoā is used with all. Why we stopped to use it in English?
I can (to) go
I should (to) go
I must (to) go
Which book did u steal this answer from ?
Lool
I summarised it but it was so hard to find
@cloud canyon https://oldenglish.info/advanced2.html
An online educational resource for learning Old English
It doesnāt just talk about Old english it relates it to modern english
@mortal citrus Thank you so much
Ofc
hi there, native speaker, I would only say 'have to' is the only time where you wouldn't omitt the prepostion
i think its the exception
Same with āoughtā
otherwise any other verbs you omitt 'to'
yes, bout ought is very rarely used. I haven't heard that in a good while
Also that's really impressive, being competent at a language is a very admirable accomplishment, i wish i could have that level of fluency lol and you're what 17 ? Makes me jealous
This also isnāt a modal verb
I've been learning English for 10 years and im not even close to you.
Yeah not used at all with speaking
Or being very expressive, not event remotely
saying ought is very archaic
True
Aussie
Get oughta here
I sometimes hear that people use āshouldā something like āwillā (future tense). What it means in that usage?
I canāt remember any example sentence
Lmao
I should've and would've but could've gone
so an example
'i will go to the store' (future tense), they say 'I should go to the store'
i ought to
heheh
what a weird word
ought
bdhshdh
lets keep it that way
I think it comes from British English
Sounds about right
do u have a favourite english word
Oughtdated word
Yes
Spill
King/black
Oh interesting
Shall isnāt used at all in speaking
Yes
I have heard it in English(England) shows
Lmao
In informal discussions, āshallā is not used
What about formal? What does it mean?
shall is only really used in the first person
True
Why would I use shall instead of will
Yeah
King is such a powerful word, when you hear it you get shivers, king of the north, kings landing, pirate king, has such an impactful impact on us
Black sounds very mysterious and cool and intriguing, I also love black like the color, black blade, black fire, etc
Okay but what does it mean?
Amazing
You shall not pass!
But i would say 1-king 2-black
you'd use shall as a way saying something will happen in the future
its more in formal speak
Shall sounds very poetic
I like Kingburg š¤£
Burgerking ?
You should not pass!
but should is used more often
He shall face severe consequences for his recent actions.
and shall sounds pretencoius and too formal
Yea!
Does it has possibility meaning?
Yea i'd say they're interchangable
Yes
For black, I love Black Mamba Kobe
Does it have
(Thanks fenti)
š
'should' and 'shall' are basically interchangable
I also wonder why we use have/has in some tenses.
I have gone.
In here why we use a word which means possession?
I have
You have
He/She/It has
We have
They have
š
yes
Yāall have
Ooo
y'all have is plural second person
Yāall ā> You all
english doesn't differentiate between singular and plural second person
unlike the romance languages i think
Yep french
yea i'm learning italian
Learn Bulgarian. 7 million people speak it. Just wow! So many!
Oh nice
Hmm
Plural = have
Singular = has
I, they, we, you = have
He,she,it = has
no but i like learning italian
it has this flow that english doesn't have
its very elegant
u must like english tho
best way to describe it
italian flow beats french
i must say
well yes i'm a native speaker of english
ok good
idk some natives dont like english
i joined this server becasue i'm curious how people learn english
to me it seems like a mess of a language to learn
Lmfao
Why wouldn't they ? English is such a fun good language
š
Learning isn't the main objective of this server
from learning italian to like idk a2/b1, english would be a pain in the ass to learn
People make friends here, get to talk to people to learn how to be social, they get to learn about different cultures
Even tho this IS an English learning server it's not the ONLY thing. Just 1 aspect of it
makes sense
helping others is rewarding
i love being able to answer questions
would be extremely rewarding
im trying to find french buddy
While it's not physically rewarding, it can be emotionally satisfying
lmao
fr
how do you find it
are you a native english speaker?
yep
ahhhh yea
You can check their roles
Everyone's role
Thank you guys can help us here!
š„°
Idk why but i feel like my speaking/social skills are like market stocks, they increase and decrease
And i can't point my finger to why that is lol
interesting simile
u practice every day?
I don't talk to people everyday, (both languages)
oh ok
Idk why my performance on any social activity depends on my mood for the day
hm
do we have any advanced english speakers in the chat right now?
Yes
who
I'm a beginner for today
Me, moxy (as of now) thereās also Big Chungus
but moxy said she beginner
.. bshdhd
No, i got downgraded
For today
Damn okay
I'm like a 4G connection lmao
Did u have a question?
š
Yes
so since you are an advanced english speaker what is a very loong english word i can say to impress my crush
like not veryyy long
You could say anything r u looking for anything specific?
LMAO
but thats veryyyy long i cant say that
@swift briar be serious lmfaoš
He/she said long lol
is she a fluent speaker
BSHDHSH
yes very fluent
@flat rune Maybe if u want to complement ur crush u could use adjectives like āravishingā ādelightfulā āenchantingā ..
which country is she from
that would make a difference by saying something regfional
regional
I bet European
So i say to her you are ravishing right?
Yeah
Astonishing is a good word
Breathtaking
^^
we are both from the UK if that helps
Classic
From or living ?
pour a pint into ya
Lmaoo
If you're from the uk how come you're a beginner
wait fr ..
i like that word what it mean
Amazing
i live in UK but not native
gotcha
pub as in puppy?
Yall call bars pub ?
Well we say bars but also pubs
a pub is a type of bar
often you go to a pub for a meal, for a beer or watch sport
Yes
I can't differentiate bars, they all look alike
A store where u buy booze
okk so i have to go to pub
a bar is a place you go to drink, a place to buy alcohol to take home is a liquor store
You don't have to
Damn
wait
I mean when u go to a bar you buy drinks
yes
Is what i meant
Will it still help if I go by myself?
š
For what ?
help you to go to a pub
its a social place
you can go on your own
wait you're not advanced?
its best to go with someone
I ain't fluent for S#$%, my fluency depends on my mood.
fair enough
I'm a native speaker
wow
Fluctuating quite regularly
Really
^^
Maybe
its literally me with french
i'd say to help you, compliment something about her
i cannot be a perfectionist
personality
But i rather be harsh on myself than overestimating myself
And be stuck
Living in my own illusions
guys i googled for a big word and it says it is pnemonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoisis is this word good?
sometimes being harsh can force ur brain to not repeat mistakes but still
Nah my word is better
LMFAO
but it says thats the biggest word possible
100% she'll marry you
Tbh size doesn't matter, sometimes saying "i love u" can be more impressive than saying that word u just sent
Lol
it's not about how long the words you say are, what matters is what words you choose and how you say them
Cyclopentadienyl-propylcyclopentadienylruthenium is a longer word. š±
hehe but i am not saying I love you just yet
try not to waffle on as well
Yes
Sorry fenti ā¤ļø from now on i shall refrain from being harsh on myself.
Good
well but i am not sure she'll like me saying some random organic compound haha
impress her with 2-methylpentanol
chemistry rizz
(pls dont)
I need to get a hepaticocholecystostcholecystenterostomy in the village of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch because I used too much methylenedioxycyclopropylmethylamphetamine.
Sounds good to me
she will say like a compound twice the size of that trust me she's smart š
Lmaoo
I see, flexing your fluency at its fullest
I'd rather avoid organic chemistry guys lets think in some other directionš
perhaps physics is the way to go
.
What ?
what's system failiure
That bot came out of nowhere
no clue
i think it was trying to ask me to not say words bigger than 20 letters or something but not sure
Here is just not for chat. Only question and answer.
Depends if the discussion is relevant to an aforementioned question. We're here to learn, and sometimes questions need further clarification
I would like if you take a moment to consider my application and reply me with the best of your circumstances and consideration.
is this sentence good
I would say so
I would say 'I would like if you could take a moment and consider my application.'
I wouldn't say the second part
too much in one sentance
yeah
I would be grateful if you could take a moment to consider my application and reply with the best options available given the circumstances.
perfect
chatgpt wrote this
yea sometimes AI is a great tool
sometimes
I think you should join spelling bee š„²
i recently learned "ophthalmologist", until this day i only thought of "optician" and "eye doctor"
i know that optician is a different profession
Where?
Guys, would you lend me a hand with the meaning of āset us upā?
The costumes for the show, they set us up in this world.
It means "to make something more immersive, to make it look like it belongs" in this sentence
So the costumes make the speakers look/feel like they belong in the show's world
Usually it means something negative though. It means "to trick, trap someone"
Satisfying enough. Thanks a lot.
hey, I write a correct sentence, but when I talk, I do something wrong in grammar.
anyone has a solution.
it happens sometimes
maybe you know the grammar but you dont really feel it too strongly when you have no time to think and analyze
it helps to listen to english on daily basis
a lot of "what feels right" is just automatically inferred by our brain from what we hear other people say, this is how we learned our native languages, and this is also how we build the intuition in other languages, so
i think thats the solution, like there is no way to speak properly if someone doesnt even listen to the language regularly
don't we have to say "generation HAS ..." in the second example sentence?
British English convention. Collective nouns may use the plural verb if each individual in the collective could be treated independently. Not standard in American English.

i remember seeing it few times and i was 1000% sure it was terribly wrong
lol
but most of my english is coming from americans
In American English, yeah... it wouldn't be weird to assume it's wrong.
TIL woww thats interesting, i didnt know
My generation has
My generations have
I say generation is Singular
Hihi I need help plsss
- What tense is used in this sentence
- Change the sentence to a question sentence
-
my brother said you sounded upset
-
they found the longue underground
-
I'll count down while you find the nouns
-
he measures the weight in pounds
my brother said you sounded upset- Simple past tense
they found the longue underground- Simple past tense
I'll count down while you find the nouns- Simple present tense
he measures the weight in pounds- Simple present tense
There are many ways you could make these into question sentence otherwise known as interrogative sentences.
The easiest way would be to use a helping verb or a modal verb such as (Have, has, had, do, does, did, would, will) in the beginning of the sentence, then add the subject (the person/ the thing the sentence is about) and then the verb (the action that is being done) and duplicate the sentence.
For example, the sentence 'they found the longue underground' can be changed into a question like this-
Have they found the lounge underground?
Here, ****have ** is the helping verb, they is the subject and found is the verb
The other way is to duplicate the entire sentence and then add the question in the end- This is called a question tag...
The same sentence can be made into a question like this-
They found the lounge underground, haven't they?
Here too you are using a helping verb followed by the subject. The only difference would be that if the sentence is positive, the question tag will be negative.
my brother said you sounded upset- Did my brother say you sounded upset? or My brother said you sounded upset, didn't he? (Here, the highlighted sentence doesn't give the same meaning. So, you need to pick a question form that will not change the meaning of the sentence)
they found the longue underground- Did they find the longue underground? or They found the longue underground, didn't they?
I'll count down while you find the nouns- Will I count down while you find the nouns or I will count down while you find the nouns, won't/ wouldn't I?
he measures the weight in pounds- Does he measure the weight in pounds? or He measures the weight in pounds, doesn't he?
"Long time ago." Can I say it without an 'A'?
I know that Putting an A is grammatically correct, but what if I remove A and how does it sound like?
It is grammatically incorrect to use this phrase without an 'a' before it.
'It was a long time ago' is correct and 'It was long time ago' is not. The reason we add an 'a' before it is because we are speaking about a particular period of time.
Is this expression correct? "has the responsibility for doing something"
Yes but the sentence is incomplete
I found there also is another expression that "has the responsibility to do something", I think both of them are correct.
hi
3rd one is simple future tense
how to read "t" in "mutton" on earth?
thanks, ron
thanks Moxy-poxy. Here is ur 1$ šµ
in the sentences "i`m working" the word "working" will be a participle?
I am also interested in this question being answered, because I've searched online and found information that it was indeed a present participle as well as a gerund. So, naturally, my extention to the aforementioned question is: Is that true? How can you tell those two apart when it is confusing? (I know that gerunds function as nouns and participles function as adjectives)
It must be JUST a participle, right?
I don't know how to tell either. For now, let me ask you another question. participle works like a verb? since in Russian the participle does not occur in Continuous tense
participle is formed from a verb
A gerund functions as a noun in a sentence, while a participle is part of the verb
Gerund example:
I like swimming. Swimming is my hobby.
=> Swimming is a gerund in both cases
bleeding ankle would be a present participle from the verb to bleed
Please read the message carefully
in the example you provided it is apparent
I is the subject pronoun
like is the verb
Well, isn't that the answer to your question. How to tell them apart = How they function in a sentence
why, then? I have to speak with the participle, what am I doing now if I need a verb. why not such an offer? - i work , i`m work
When is it confusing
well, I don't know. I was confused by an answer online from english stackexchange
I got a table right here hold on
okay, so gerund is just a noun?
right?
It acts as a noun, yes
and participle is also acting as a verb so it's a bit ambiguous?
nvm I confused myself, thank you
but still
what the hell was that answer
it must be wrong, then
Just think of the gerund as "the act of doing something"
Like, "swimming" as a gerund is the act of swimming
So I am swimming, it is NOT gerund because you are not the act
You are performing the action, so it is participle in a verb
thank you
I hope that answers your question as well
What exactly do you mean?
example "I'm working" I'm talking about the present tense what I'm doing now, I'm talking about actions, so why do I need a participle if a verb is needed here, I don't understand it
not
Present continuous. The verb consists of:
The auxiliary verb "be" + the present participle of a verb
Both of these combine together to form the whole verb of the tense

Anyway, if you don't want to use a (present) participle, use a different tense. But then that'd change the meaning of the sentence
ancillary connects objects with an addition. Maybe a linking verb here?
Auxiliary verbs need another verb form behind it, not an object
Only transitive verbs, linking verbs and complex verbs need an object behind them
I am English Helper yes
makes me anxious
I just like the color pink
couldn't you just ask for it?
Probably not
in the sentences "i`m working" there is nothing behind it, I don't understand you
The auxiliary verb here is "am", with the present participle "working" behind it
Here's the formula for the verb of the present continuous tense again
why is persons a word
and here ?
Moscow is a large city.
never knew that there were 3 different forms of verb+ing (adj, verb, noun). Always thought it was just gerund 
Why english is a language.
i thought you helper
I only help when I'm knowledgeable
who is more knowledgeable than you
Everyone
"Is" acting as a linking verb. Linking verb can have a noun or adjective behind it. So:
Moscow is a large city.
Subject + linking verb + (determiner + adjective + noun)
why is persons a word
English moment 
Can you give examples of the difference between an auxiliary verb and a copula. I have ceased to understand
Persons is mostly used in formal or legal contexts, to refer to the group of people mentioned before. It's to make sure they only refer to those people and no one else outside of those people
While people is generally used in the same meaning as "everyone", as in there is no individual, just a large group of people
you were right
Persons is often used in formal, legal contexts to emphasize individuals as opposed to a group.
Copula is a linking verb. Like I said, linking verb is followed by a NOUN or an ADJ. It is used to mean the subject = something, like adding characteristics to it, like:
He is a basketball player. He is tall.
An auxiliary verb is part of the verb of a sentence. Auxiliary verbs include "be, have" and the modal verbs. You use auxiliary verbs to determine the tense (which is also the meaning) of the sentence:
I am working. (Aux verb = am; present cont.)
He has left. (Aux verb = has; present perf.)
okay, new question.
Is 'running' adjective or present participle in the following sentence:
'She bought a new pair of running shoes'
im red color. this is linking verb Im working. this is auxiliary verb
Right?
The present participle is functioning as an adjective
"Am" in the first sentence is a linking verb
In the second sentence it is an aux verb
Yes
participle is a verb similar to an adjective, but it can also contain an adverb, as far as I know
the question remains-
it turns out that the auxiliary verb is only needed for the participle to become a verb?
Only in some tenses, like the continuous and perfect tenses. You MUST have an aux verb, or else it would be grammatically incorrect
In simple tenses, you don't need an aux verb
Oh yeah I understand you now. Yes, you're right
Yes, it is a present participle
An easy way to identify a gerund is to question the main verb of the sentence with 'what'
For example- I love swimming.
Now you question: I love what?
Ans: Swimming
Therefore swimming is a gerund
Understood.Thanks a lot . You helped me a lot.
and if I say " the toy decomposing on the table"
I'm not talking about real time here, but in general. can't say that?
You can say it. When it is happening (the past or the present) will be up to other information in the conversation so far
This is a case of a reductive relative clause. You can look it up to read more about it
it`s clear. but can i tell?
Can you tell what
Sorry I don't really understand 
the toy decomposing on the table.
dad working at the factory, too tired.
man helped me here. but thanks for trying to help. but unfortunately about the questions, I don't understand how it should help me to understand. I am from Russia
You can use these phrases yeah. But they're not full sentences yet, only noun phrases
clear, thank

@supple holly
I have thinked here
when I say this to a person. so it`s possible? - "you is clear ?"
so it's possible? : so possible? - what role does it play"it's" ?
Try this website: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/impersonal-verbs/#:~:text=Impersonal verbs are verbs that,ā or āit's snowing.ā
Sometimes you just want to talk about something without being specific, so you use the subject "it". "It" doesn't need to mean anything, or anything specific at all
Your example is a case of this
Thanks. Can the phrase "you is clear" be so?
It should be "you are clear". The pronoun "you" always use the plural form of verbs
But if it's a question then it should be "are you clear?"

exactly. I forgot. thanks
Do you need help 
actually when i think about this then english has it so straightforward, like with present participle
my native has like few groups of them
of equivalents, kinda, to "participle"
@supple holly if I want to tell a friend that I work at all, and not that I have a process now. then it will be like this? - i work
Uhh I don't really get your question
example:
"are you working in your life?"
"yes I work" - It's right ?
(I'm not talking about now, but descriptions of myself)
Kinda a strange question and answer in my opinion. A more natural conversation would be:
"Do you work?" or "Do you have a job?"
"Yes, I do"
It should be that simple
so how do I say it in present simple ? So ? "i do work"
topic "do" I have not studied yet
Just "I do" is enough. The other person will automatically understand you do what based on their question
I not need workarounds. i need a solution
Uhhhh that's the solution
I don't understand what you're trying to do
i want to tell a friend in present simple tense that i work, swim, poop
You just did
"I work. I swim. I poop"
it`s cleat. it's just that one native speaker told me that he might think from this phrase "" that I have a job and not that I work at all.
so i asked ^-^
Don't trust everything natives say
just my opinion
I try )) it's good that I'm the kind of person who asks too many questions 
@supple holly I have a feeling that the adverb is always placed after the verb, are there any exceptions?
Not always. You can still place it before the verb (especially if that verb has an object)
I quickly leave.
I quickly give the cake to him.
Those are examples of adverbs before verbs
i know that for example Japanese almost always places adverbs before the verbs, but english is most of the time the opposite
tbh polish does the opposite of english too, now if i think about this english really makes no sense
That's the beauty of it 
that's how it is. do I just have to remember this or are there rules about this moment ?
Most of the time you'll be fine just saying what feels natural to you
But adverb before the verb is almost always grammatically correct (I can't think of a scenario where it isn't but there could be 1 or 2)
it`s clear, thanks )

@supple holly sir/mam
What is the difference between
She has been fired
She got fired
Could you explain
most natives dont give a crap about their language and just speak it but they can still spread misinformation about their own native language so yes true
"has been" is progressive, "got" is past perfect
"she has been fired" is when a person got fired and is still unemployed ig
otherwise its not really a natural sentence imo
||"got" is actually just simple past passive|| 
ye true im busy rn so im not paying attention to tenses
Is it so
"she's been fired from her job for a while now" has the sort of intension that the person that we're talking about got fired from her job and wants it back
If you're using them to talk about the same recent event, both are fine to me
The only small difference is, "has been" means she's still unemployed
While "was" doesn't tell you if she's still unemployed or got a new job
So if you're retelling a past event, you won't be able to use "she's been fired", especially if she found a new job afterward
actually it is possible if we're talking about the same company
"she's been fired from company 1, she now works in company 2"
it's complex and it's better not to talk about that in order not to confuse people tho
they'll get it with time
immersion
@frail quest thank you
I agree I agree. Good man
I agree with this, but it also might just mean that she's been fired recently
also true yes
actually that doesnt seem that natural
"what's up with her"
"she just got fired"
American?
"what's up with her"
"she's been fired"
this seems unnatural without adding smth like "for a while"
english
Ahhh interesting then
there is no morphological difference in american and british english
both have essentially the same grammar
although those in lower classes in america tend to speak weirdly
Collocations mate
there's currently a diachronic morphological shift where the hypothetical conditional past is being replaced by the same form as the conditional past lmao

no relation
many americans nowadays say "what if i was" instead of "what if i were" when speaking in the hypothetical conditional past tense
Hasn't it always been like this
thats the only example i can give rn
nah
havent noticed this sort of behaviour with english ppl
It does change things a lot. Certain grammatical differences are there
I mean, hasn't Americans always talked like that
nope
Like they didn't just start doing it recently
proper american english has the correct form in hypothetical conditional past
"if .. were"
if you're asking me when they started doing it i don't know
Huh. I'm not a native so I wouldn't know. But that's always been what I heard. I only knew about "if were" once I started learning English seriously
Interesting though
Overall they're the same language so the similarities overrule
what are you on about mate
we're talking about a general rule that is the same in all English dialects
what similarities are you on about
What does "This is personal" mean and when do you use it? Can someone explain me specifically? Because when I searched it, I didn' t understand at all. There is no such as this phrase expression in my language ;-; there arent any explanations about it
"i am taking this seriously and it means a lot to me, most likely i would also think of it as a secret"
depends on the context
but if someone tells you this, then most likely they mean it is not an information they would like to share randomly to different people
like
"Ok, this is gonna be personal. So...I was actually in love with her." = the speaker loved her and tells you that, they wanna show you that it meant a lot to them and it feels like a secret, or they are emotionally attached to it
like it's private
not something they would tell most of the people
or maybe "It was a very personal issue to me, you should have known that." = sounds as if you told that to some other person and you were supposed to keep a secret
they were*
hm
nvm
missed the "some other person AND you"
missed the "some other person"
my bad
I promise I am not dyslexic
okay it's fine
what is the difference between their and there?
āTheirā signifies possession of the third person plural pronoun ātheyā.
āThereā signifies āat that pointā.
[There is a lot of people at the house] ā> You can replace āthereā with āat that pointā if that helps you.
[Their house is full of people] ā> āTheirā means that they (multiple people) own the house.
thank you! 
Hi all.
the impersonal verb is only "it", and as I think it is not used in speech, but only in the text, right?
Okay, So it depends on the situation.
So this is how it works? : "Okay, this is gonna be personal. So... I was actually in love with her." = "Okay, this is kinda like one of my private thing / secret. ...." But I don't really understand the other one, the bad situtation.
So I know that the phrase : "I took that personal" means the one is taking something very offensive and finds it and angry and being pissed off. (or if you can explain it more specific, that'll be great, I am not used to this kind of english phrase) When you say "This is personal", I get that in this situation, you're in your angry mood and can't stand it. But what is "this"? The feeling the one's having? The anger? Is it meant like = "I was keeping this anger towards you as a private but I've been very mad and impatient these days. Now I'm telling you I'm pissed off."
Spongebob Squarepants
Season 2 episode 16
The Fry Cook Games
In this situtaion, What's the 'personal' for Patrick? The anger towards Spongebob?
And also in this situation, what does it mean? It's confusing. He said he is seeking for revenge, so it sounded Rad is saying "I have an private anger towards someone who I want to revenge.", But after I heard explanation from you, it felt more like "I'll tell you my secret story, come here and listen." What exactly is he trying to say?
depends, "this" can mean different things
in this phrase
for example in the spongebob recording i think what patrick meant was that the action of licking feet of spongebob is very important to him, so it is personal
he wants to be alone with his foot, and its so important, its personal for him
yeah, this phrase doesnt always mean the same thing, it can be positive or negative, but either way it is important to the person
he has a private anger and a personal drive for revenge, so it is personal to him, because he finds it very important to himself
while patrick has a private need and a personal drive for licking the foot, so it is personal to him, this time the meaning is positive, but either way, its important
"I took that personal" may be very negative and angry, if the context suggests it, or actually positive, if the context allows this
"She told me she loved me, and it was personal to me..." = he was told she had loved him, and it was very important to him, he most likely felt a positive feeling, joy, and felt like its a personal matter between him and her
but "to take something personal" doesnt have to mean the same as "it is personal", the first one usually expresses negative emotions, the second one is really used for everything from positive to negative
"and this... is personal" could mean it's very important for him to seek the revenge, like i dont even know this cartoon so, but thats what i assumed from the clip
yeah, this one is positive, but it can also be negative, while "i took something personal" is mostly a negative expression
"this is personal" and "i take it personal" are different expressions
the first one is just the usage of "personal" adjective, the second one is a set phrase
are you sure it's not "personally", or either is fine? (in the latter sentence)
i think the correct grammar is personally
but some people say "take it personal" too
I take it personally
I would probably just say "i took it personally"
Don't take it personally