#đď˝english-questions
1 messages ¡ Page 8 of 1
Without any context, it could both mean they went and returned and went and didn't return.
Though, for the 1st example I would more likely use "been" instead of "gone"
would you like to try explain more basicly. If this'' Where have they gone this afternoon'' mean can be they went and return why should i Use peresent perfect
You can use past simple as well.
Yeah I know but I try to understand their difference in that sentence
Now I am looking a website they are trying to learn like that
so I confused 
Yes, "gone" implies they haven't returned/come back yet
anyone here at this hour
Hello! In the following sentence is is or are used? New medicine for many diseases __ found
is
what dose I'll have to make do with just you then, won't I? mean?
Make do means to cope with certain circumstances, usually bad ones
And the sentence means that I will have to (insert meaning) with only you and won't I makes it a question
Please use can, can't, must, musnt, could, should, may, would, will in a sentence about beaches
Whee
what dose Wow, you're taking the whole thing no problem! mean?
"If I were a billionaire, I would donate a huge sum of money to organisations" is this good enough for second conditional?
I have a question. When we use "already" and "yet"?
is the sentence structure correct? (luck is a factor of hard work)
Already is used for events that have happened, or events done earlier than expected.
âIâve done my homework alreadyâ.
Yet is for events that have not happened.
âI havenât started my homework yetâ.
Structure is correct not quite sure about the meaning
Thanks!
is there someone here give me an explanation about this words EXPRESSION how to use in sentences
I don't like the expression on your face..
Ohh i see thanks fam
Can you give me more sentences if you dont mind
Expressions are necessary when you want to convey emotions
what does ( You know there's a word for players like you... ) mean?
Expression was adjectives or what?
It can be used as adjectives as well as noun...depends on how you put it to use
Mmm it's seem to be hard to use expression đ
It's fine .. you'll get used to it...
What's the same meaning of expression
Expression means the action of making known one's thoughts or feelings or to express one's emotions
Okey fam thanks a lot
I really won't used the translator but at this time i already used it because to your said
Your welcome
In this time of learning english you need use it, because you have to known new words. And then step by step remembering ones.
what does Oh, Yumi rike sound of that. mean?
"Rike sound'', maybe "Ride sound"?
what does erseware! mean?
That is not an English word
You are welcome
what does Pending activation. mean?
pending is like waiting for something. so in this case waiting for something to be activated
thank
You can use dictionary bot for definations
pending
[1] (verb)
To hang down.
[2] (verb)
To pen; to confine.
[3] (verb)
To consider pending; to delay or postpone (something).
[4] (adjective)
Awaiting a conclusion or a confirmation.
[5] (preposition)
While waiting for something; until.
/define
Hi, my English level is B2. I write in English without translation in my head. Due to grammar problems, I have this level. For example, I can't explain why I use different verbs. Can you give me the title of a book that will help me understand this?
Hello
Could you help me?
Is this sentence correct?:
none of my friends takes their day off on Thursday or Friday.
I want to say that I have no friend that doesn't work on those days
Is the verb "takes" correct?
I read that none takes a singular verb in formal speaking and plural informal speaking, is that true?
Take. But I would say none of my friends take Thursday or Friday off
Takes is singular. He takes Fridayâs off. They take fridays off
Okay, got it. Thank you so much. I really appreciate it !!!
What does it mean to say that a debate or speech is controversial?
I don't really understand the word controversial.
It means that it caused a lot of controversy in public, so the speech revealed an opinion completely different from the majority's one.
it means that there are many opinions about a specific topic
and which
it causes a disagreement
Is it more correct to say âi taught myself how to bike and swimâ or âi taught myself biking and swimmingâ
the former
How do I do turn on the camera on this server, what should I do ?
Guys I have this doubt. When I use the word People Do I have to say That people or Those people? Thanks...

Those people
Thanks I will make a sentence. Those people are known like rude people.

Maybe "known as"?
"Those people are known as rude people."
But, I believe this sounds a bit better:
"Those people are known for being rude."
Yes
Tbh, it sounds a bit off.
The meeting raced off on the question of whether a "state actor" could have been behind the anthrax attacks.
what does this statement mean? like, the anthrax attacks were an inside job?
yes if the quotation marks are put that way it seems like it
what does Hue Hue Hue! mean?
what does Should I even bother tying him up? mean?
In Brazil it was used a long time ago, for a long time, as a laugh on internet. Like: hahaha. But in a âmeme wayâ. If you look up on google you are going to see something about that, for sure.
It's probably a slurred "Yumi like the sound of that".
It means that someone likes an idea.
thank
thank
The full term is not a word in English, but the suffix "-ware" is used to refer to something being created and used for a task.
I.e. "hardware", "software", "dinnerware", "silverware".
thanks
Controversial means that the subject will spark public debate or a discussion fuelled mostly by irritation and hatred.
So a speech or debate are "controversial" because they're pretty often full of nothing and offer nothing new, they only really exist for people to fight and feel like they won something.
âLiverpool have only won two games in this seasonâ
In this sentence, the grammar should be âLiverpool has only won..â. But why does Sky Sports News put âhaveâ instead?
they made a mistake
typos happen
:P
no, has is right
anything else should be a mistake
Ik has is right but I mean I always see lots of mistakes made by BBC news itself
do you have a link to the article?
When referring to the place/ city of Liverpool, we always use has.
âLiverpool has a gang problemâ.
When referring to the football club, âhaveâ is sometimes used. It may be grammatically incorrect, but I guess a language is a living thing that changes.
âLiverpool have won the FA cupâ.đ
Context tells me that it is Liverpool FC, but also âhaveâ tells me the subject here is not the city of Liverpool. That is always has.
'state actor' means someone from a country's government. So, for example, did the North Korea government send someone on a mission to put anthrax in the mail? That's the question.
i got it
Hi guys^^ I'd like to ask you a question based on the text that i'll send to this chatroomđđť
Is the word "should" correct in the line "That Wednesday, I should perform presentation in front of the owner of the company."?
Thankyou in advance
Should have would've been better since the past is referred to.
And applying that little modification the sentence turns into "I should've performed a presentation"
sorry for asking again, but is "I should've performed..." is a present perfect form?đđťđđť
It is not in the present perfect
thank you for the answer and explanationđđť
No problem
I actually messed up a bit, it is in the present perfect
Sorry
I was a little distracted
oohh it's okaay. No problem, thanks a bunch for answering my questionđŤ°
Hi all, can anyone please tell me the grammatical structure of this sentence? In France President Emmanuel Macron has come under attack after an inquiry this year found the government had spent $1bn on consulting firms with âtentacularâ links with the state.
I can sort of understand what it's saying but not 100% absorbing it
thanksđĽ°
btw it's cited from the economist and this paragraph is criticizing the consultancy industry
The government spent money on companies that have power over the government.
That's as simple as I can make it
But why is âhaveâ used in football club? I dont understand
Have is plural. Unless they're defining the group as plural (something I've noticed from Britain), it is wrong.
Damn itâs so confusingâŚ
Collective nouns. Sometimes singular, sometimes plural.
Thx for the explanation đ
But when weâre talking about a football club, we use singular instead of plural
It's a British thing.
Sometimes they'll call individual companies plural entities, sometimes they won't.
Sky Sports News is a British media organization, so it uses so-called British English spelling, vocabulary and grammar. Collective nouns are often treated as grammatically plural in British English because they're considered to be a group of people. This is almost always the case for sports teams, but is also common for other entities like companies and government agencies.
North American English treats all collective nouns as grammatically singular.
Ohh that makes more sense. I understand now. Thanks!
Yeah. The unit is understood as a singular unit due to it, you know, being a singular unit.
yes
There was a
it is better to say "if there was a discount"
than were
i'd probably say so
yeah
no problem
đ¤¨
You shouldn't reopen those old wounds. It's idiom? What is it mean?
Idiomatically, an old wound is something in the past that brings up a negative emotional reaction, be it sadness, anger etc. So to bring up an old wound is to remind someone of a bad experience... but the experience can be any kind, since this is an idiom. A divorce, a break-up with a girlfriend... these count.
Also hi.
(waves)
Thank you!
I want to know where some people are within a region. Is this sentence correct: Where in Calahan are you guys at?
If you mean where someone is instead of where someone lives, then it's largely ok... but the "at" isn't needed and probably isn't helpful. "Where in Calahan are you guys?" This sounds like proper informal structure to me. (People are happy to contradict me. I'm not a professor!
that sounds more natural indeed. thanks
helppp
The people who hugged the trees" is a beautiful story that takes place a long time ago in India. Not only does it show the importance of trees and protecting the environment but also standing up for what one believes in. This story is about a poor girl named Amrita who lives in a village. She loved the trees. For her, the forest was life. She knows that the trees protect her village from desert sandstorms and provide shade from the hot sun. When Maharajah, the king of the village, sent his men to cut down the trees, Amrita fought against them, and saved the trees, this is what makes her a very dauntless girl. The story really falls into relating our own world too. People protect what they love and will make sacrifices if needed too. Amrita showed a lot of bravery in defending the trees, and it gives the readers many examples and key insights to not give up. In conclusion, it is to see a story with such courageous characters who are willing to fight for what they believe in, This is a wonderful story of courage and love of nature.
Maybe use located instead of at.
What is the exact meaning of ''kingsmen''?
Which one do you usually use nowadays?
1 â Confuse with.
2 â Mistake for
3 â Mix up (with)
This is something that I need to use many times, but Iâve never known which one.
2
Mistook is rlly common
Mixup is usually with objects
Confuse with is usually people
So mistook is like a balance and imo more frequently used
Roger! Thank you.
Np
Itâs a rank in some regiment but it means this-
An adherent (follower) of the king
especially a supporter of the British cause during the American Revolution
Or a customhouse (an office where customs duty are collected) officer
Thank you
Hi
np
Hello
What's the meaning of "being headed for somewhere". Could you help me with a short explanation? Please
And is "being headed to somewhere" the same?
I have this example
"I was supposed to be headed for Aruba on my honeymoon
means that you were supposed to be going somewhere
I looked it up. Headed for means you're going to arrive eventually, it could be a winding route. Heading to Aruba means you're going there directly and promptly.
Example, a cruise line with 5 stops vs. a direct flight
Thank you guys
Hopefully I can encourage people to ask questions.
Hi guys, do you have any recommendations to be faster in building the sentences in your head to be more fluid?
To build them faster you have to know the components well. People use idiomatic phrases like 'cheats' to get the message across, use "real English", but not have to think as deeply. Trying not to use idioms takes a lot of work, I think.
"i don't have neither dresses nor skirts"
could someone tell me if "neither" and "nor" are used correctly in that sentence?
This is right
But you donât need to include âdonâtâ
yea
you could also just say or instead of nor
nor is grammatically correct but if you say or people wouldn't question it
tyy guys đ
np
what does Kiss for luck? mean?
it's just an expression to wish good luck I believe
I've rarely heard it used but I'm pretty sure that's what it means
thanks
what does Mission first.mean?
Literally the King's men.
All of them.
Keep making sentences in your head with the terms and structures you know. Slowly incorporate learned structures and words as time goes on.
Doing it all in le head is very easy, though, so don't rely on it.
You shouldn't use double negatives.
"I don't have neither" = â
"I have neither" = 
Mission first means that the mission is to be completed before anything else is done.
Thanks!
what does( Eugh, this is gonna suck... )mean?
Whatever the guy will do will suck.
thanks
what does Hell, thy name is sewage drain. mean?
That sounds like a part of a larger quote.
I still don't understand no thanks
If I just work with the main quote, it's Early Modern English.
"Thy (your) name is sewage drain"
It's just calling the place, hell, a land of shit and piss.
thanks
Np.
Mfw English gave up on pronouns like thou and thy because they were for low class only 
You don't look at all too and You don't look at all, either. What different?
what does Don't give me the glaring thing, it's not going to work! mean?
it means don't glare at me/do something like a glare that is shared between two or more people as an inside thing, it's not going to work
like
ex.
someone has a funny glare, and the other people laugh at it
don't give me the glaring thing, it's not going to work!
so they're like telling them to not glare because they won't laugh
not sure if that makes sense
thanks
Can someone help me with this?
I have the sense that this kind of problem needs "your" answers instead of answers in general... so try to list things about the "contrasts" in isolation at first, and then you can decide how they meet in the middle, what kind of similarities there are between the two.
So from your POV, elderly, then young, and then you look at what is "not" so different that may apply to both
I grabbed this off Google
It's an example of how to use Venn diagrams, not an example of answers for your specific case, but maybe it'll help anyway.
Good luck.
what does Well, good luck with that, I guess... mean?
the latter
There isn't one.
Present participle.
There's nothing in the sentence that forces a future grammatical structure, so the verb is in the present tense.
When looking into gerunds, think of it like this:
Gerunds are just actions that become subjects or objects. "Getting", in this sentence, isn't either of them. It's a verb.
It's a dismissive way of writing "well, okay".
How do I know if what the mood of the speaker is speaking at poems? Any tips perhaps? I'm having difficulties at distinguishing what mood the speaker speaks.
what does Holy crap, did somebody turn the heat up or something?! mean?
DarkAngel: "Well, good luck with that, I guess..." is usually taken as an insincere or very weak wishing of good luck, i.e. I think you'll fail miserably, but hey, good luck for what it's worth...
As for that last one about turning up the heat, this is either literal if indoors and temperature is controlled through heating... or, more likely, idiomatic, where "the heat" is pressure or intensity, especially social intensity (like if someone on a TV show says something really stupid and 10 people stare at him).
At that point the person who said the stupid thing might ask rhetorically if someone turned up the heat because he is feeling the heat.
Stress tends to make people feel physically hot too, but that's a side effect.
thanks
Sure.
to be phobic of water or about water? can these prepositions be used indistinctively?
hey guys
i need help pls
in what ?
a paragraph
tbh i am not that good
ok
any tips for learning english ?
Read a lot of books aloud.
Dont read with mind,
read with sound.
And vocabulary, you must not leave behind.
umm, can u recommed me books ?
Sarah, Plain and Tall.
The Big Wave.
Magnus Chase
Adventures of Tom Sawyer
Pinocchio (old version)
oh also, comics can help
I got a question
What is literature in your opinion, and what is considered âliteratureâ to you
Different types of English books from around the world
Hmm, can you elaborate
Iâm having a little bit of trouble to interpret what I consider is literature
So I want to hear some opinions
Do âby itselfâ, âin itselfâ, and âin and of itselfâ mean the same thing?
No
||Also, cowboy bebop Stan?||
To have a fear of water is to have a fear of water itself. Having a fear about water doesn't make sense.
You're describing the fear about water at that point.
Literature would be books that actually mean something. I don't really consider Twain's Tom Sawyer any good because it feels.. stock, almost. He was, first and foremost, an author who needed money. That's why I would call Connecticut Yankee literature and Tom Sawyer "literature".
One has passion but is so miserably stock, the other has passion but was locked away until his death for having too much of it.
Like, you would find a LOT more from Relations in Our Southern States in terms of writing and cultural impact.
i have a sonnet
i was wondering if someone could tell me whether or not it is complete garbage
Put it in proofreading
alright
"There are times you won't like me." I'm basically talking about the future here but I feel like it should be "There will be times when you won't like me" but I don't know I checked this sentence on some grammar checking website and those said it's "grammatically correct"
Replace when with where.
The first sentence isn't right, but the second one is closer to your preferred meaning.
âThere will be moments that you wonât like meâ
Basic question:
Why, sometimes, there are questions that are written or are said with the auxiliary after the question word and sometimes without it ( auxiliary) ? Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
For example:
What does she say?
What she say?
I know, sometimes itâs just a âcommon wayâ, and they probably know the âright way.â Ok. Sometimes it just seems like: No, in this sentence ( question ) you donât need to use an auxiliary after the question word, though.

Pleeeeeeease, tell me that the right way ( grammatically ) is ALWAYS, A - L- W - A - Y - S with an auxiliary after the question word. Thank you in advance. đ¤
"What she say" isn't right and usually is said by learners when first introduced to the tongue.
Really, "what does she say" isn't said either. It's "what did she say", or "what is she saying". It's one of those lines that are usually reserved for specific contexts, i.e. someone not related to the conversation said something and the listener replies with "well, what does she say (about X)?".
This is the same for other questions without an auxiliary verb, i.e. "what you do", "what you doing", "how you do", etc.
I gave it some thought, and one could sometimes hear "what**'d** she say" as "what she say", because the light "d" and "t" sound similar enough to be confused for a learner.
The verb isn't excluded, just shortened for effeciency's sake.
Thank you so much. I was really in doubt, because even when you look up on google it send to you, sometimes, without the auxiliary, even a translator⌠then you: ? ( what ) but ok, thank you so much.
Translators aren't very helpful, even with Google.
Oh, for sure, I was just trying to remove a doubt in a fast and a little bit stupid way, after a fast little research, thank you!

Thankss
@near horizon I edited it if you wanted a weirdly exact definition
Sankyu!
Chonky
Yummy ngl
you just insulted the food community omg
It's a better name than "bull shaped" tbh.
._.
I am gonna put my question here so it's "intellect is to the mind what sight is to the body." Is this sentence grammatically correct? What does 'what' means here? I never saw any sentence like this before so I am A LITTLE BIT confused.
You think I'm joking?
The shape is literally called "taurus", Greek for "bull".
"What" here means "the thing that".
Basically, it would be better read as: "What intellect is to the mind and what sight is to the body are the same."
Tysm, I have another question. Emmm in this case, is it correct to say 'intellect is to the mind as sight is to the body'
I mean '... just like sight is to the body'
Yeah... I thought so
It's a little hard, since saying it feels utterly bizarre, but reading it makes perfect sense.
I'll just say "yes", since it makes sense when I read it.
Grammatically-speaking, everything is harder with writing, so I assume it makes more sense when I read it because it's something someone would write.
So 'what' is better here
It sounds to me like someone living in the 14th century would say something like this
It sounds much better tbh.
It's likely more that I'm being weird. When it comes to written English, especially something higher-level, I try to adhere to everything I know, whereas speech is determined by what sounds normal.
Oh got it, thx again. đ. I agree with you
Np.
can somebody explain to me the difference between astounding and astonishing?

There isn't really one.
In some very specific contexts, you could say that astounding is more positive.
Really, the reason that there isn't much a difference is because the words mean borderline the same thing.
Astonishing and astounding come from the same terms for, in their original languages, "to be shocked".
oh thank u!!
can someone tell me the difference between summarize and sum up?
Summarise: to make a summary
Sum up: to recap or to make a conclusion
But they are the same imo
They are the same thing yeah
thanx!!
What is your stand on the following statement:
Media sources are regulating the minds and reinforcing linguistic habits of the local people on a regular basis in a way that suppresses and degrades the native language by mixing languages and code-switching.
Just to be sure: the words like neighbourhood, colour, favourite etc... are used in Britain, and neighborhood, color, favorite etc... in USA?
Yes we do not use the âuâ in those words in America like they do in Britain/Canada/Australia
It's better than promoting a fake accent tbh.
You can't exactly speak to a wide audience without some people taking notes and/or copying the things they hear.
But it's a far cry superior to the high-class and actually fake accent most radio hosts or reporters had in the USA pre 1980.
Should I stick to an accent or it's alright to mixed up the pronunciation? My pronunciation isn't good and I'm trying to correct it.
Also, when I find a word like (lieutenant), it's pronounced like le(f) in British, I don't understand how (f sound) comes here, is there any explanation for this with examples of similar words?
Thank you for your help.
I like to think of it as the 'u' in 'lieutenant' being a secret 'v' because in ancient times the two letters were actually the same.
I've got nothing for 'colonel' though.
I think it probably developed out of the common soldiers using the English term 'leftenant' for the rank from 'left' whilst the educated higher-ups, who were giving the orders and writing things down, preferred the French spelling 'lieutenant'. Over time, in some places like the US, it was the French pronunciation and spelling which won whilst in others like the UK and Commonwealth nations, it was the English pronunciation which survived but still with the same French spelling.
Thank you
Mimic what those nearby in real life say and their mannerisms.
As per the reason for Lieutenant, it's just a French thing. You'll run into this problem a lot in English, just roll with it.
I.e. "Eucharist" being pronounced "you-kar-ist" and not "ev-har-ist".
A lot of English pronunciations are either made because of the attempt to stray from the French pronunciations or because people stayed close to the French pronunciations.
What are the rules for when the pronoun 'that' can refer to a person and not just a thing? Sometimes when it is plural it can refer to people but then only things when it is made singular like: 'those who live in glass houses should not throw stones' which scans perfectly versus 'that who lives in a glass house should not throw stones' which does not read well at all and must be replaced with the impersonal pronoun 'one'. Then you also have sentences where the singular 'that' can refer to a person like in 'that's my friend' but also ones where it cannot like 'that was given a choice' only for the latter to then make sense again if made plural and given the context of a conversation:
Speaker A: "Did you serve the other men tea or coffee?"
Speaker B: "Those were given a choice; they wanted coffee."
The rule is not clear to me at all; it seems arbitrary.
that is usually singular, those refers to multiple things
so "that" would be used for "that person" whereas "those" would be used for "those people"
That's when 'that' is used as a determiner. I'm talking about when it's a pronoun meaning it replaces the noun entirely rather than precedes it.
i can think about it
i dont really think about it when i use them its just natural i guess
It may have no rule at all and just be something that has to be natural.
it could be
I hope not.
Sentences like 'that's my friend' or 'that's the teacher' are what confuse me the most about it.
It would be so much simpler if 'that' could only ever be used as a pronoun for a thing.
i mean reading the original message i think that being for singular and those being plural makes sense
Yeah definitely.
in the first sentence you can't use that because you're referring to all people who live in glass houses
and in the speaker a vs speaker b thing, you should use "they were given a choice"
that and those are both incorrect
Using 'they' in that example definitely sounds more correct though I assumed they were equivalent.
I think the plural thing bothers me because of how it intersects with relative clauses. The pronoun 'that' can only be combined with the relative pronoun 'which' ('that which') but in its plural form 'those' it can suddenly be combined with not just 'which' but also 'who', 'whom', and 'whose'.
Talking it over has improved my understanding so thank you anyway.
np
True
I think I've worked part of this out.
both the pronouns 'that' and 'one' become 'those' in the plural
'one' can be combined with the relative pronouns 'who', 'whose', and 'whom' but not 'which' whilst 'that' can be combined with the relative pronoun 'which' but not 'who', 'whose', or 'whom.
Since 'those' is the plural form of both of them, it can take all of any of those relative pronouns depending on the context.
'one who seeks' becomes 'those who seek'
'one whom you serve' becomes 'those whom you serve'
'one whose path you walk' becomes 'those whose path you walk'
'that which you find' becomes 'those which you find'
that sounds about right
mhmmmm so I have one question đ "be a little less absurd." does this sentence sound weird or is it okay?
sounds weird
absurd doesn't sound like the right word there
maybe foolish
or irrational
Rich people show off money
Rich people boast money
Rich people brag about money
Differences?
Show off -> To tell other people and show how much money they have compared to the others
Boast -> To be proud/talk about abilities of achievement
Brag -> To talk excessively about money(how rich they are etc.)
Thanks Kiu
What does "hand yourself over on a silver platter" means?
To earn something without working for it
Thanks Kiu
...until the request reaches one of the true masters of time, a Network Time Server run by or referenced against the atomic clocks...
what does "referenced against" mean here? basically, the server uses the atomic clocks as reference?
how about ridiculous
thats good
"That" is a demonstrative pronoun.
Basically, if "that" can take the place of something previously defined or a phrase that is already known, it works.
You don't really use "that" as a pronoun for people in the sense of replacing them in the sentence.
"That is my mother", and whatnot. You don't use "that who lives" because you're defining a living person.
That is just used as a pronoun to determine what the existence of the noun is. It's used to grab the attention and to affirm what something is.
Sounds about right.
It means that you are being handed over like a goal or object to someone without any pretenses.
If you're talking about something being handed to the speaker on a silver platter, it means that the object is handed to the person without him doing anything and without any sort of drawbacks or something.
why everyone giving me different opinions đ
Because speakers say different things.
I'd say it, I've heard something like it said before.
-> bemoan situation
"be a little less (adjective here), would you?"
English is subjective
It sounds ok to me as well though
Does it make sense if I say "I am as happy as happy can be"
It sounds a little funny, as if âhappyâ is a person
It should be âI am as happy as I can beâ
Haha one of my friends used to say "I am as sad as sad can be" when she was sad
Lmfao
So it should be "I am as sad as I can be"
Where are you from, Tek?
Yes
China
Oh ur from China?
Yeah
Are you Chinese?
Yeah
Poggers, me too
Whut!?
Im ABC, Australian born Chinese
Woah, I was born and raised in china
That's cool bro
What language do you speak there?
I never thought I would meet Chinese here
Or, which one of the Chinese languages
Pretty sure theres plenty, but I barely encounter one too
Mandarin, and I live in the south of china
So I also know a lot of dialects bc there are plenty of dialects in the south
Ooh Iâm a Canto, and I grew up in AUS so unfortunately I donât know much
Ah got it
Bruh, you surprised me
Do you know Yunnan province?
No lol
HAHAHA
So you can speak Chinese?
Yeah, Cantonese but not Mandarin
I canât read or write either
Ah I cant speak Cantonese tho, lmao
Oh I'm learning Mandarin, but don't know enough to explain in it, apologies đââď¸
Yeah I feel you, Chinese is so difficult even for native speakers like myself
Where are you from btw
Spain 
Its fine, being able to speak Mandarin is good enough
I can speak basic phrases
But i dont have the vocab
I got more English treatment in an Asian household
Pogg. Omg so your native language is Spanish and you're learning Chinese. That's so awesome, good luck to ya
That's not a bad thing.
Thanks! It's fun when your teacher doesn't speak at 100 km/h
How do you cross out your words. Tell me pls bc I don't know
@plucky valley you pog
Do ~~ on both ends
Ah tysm
It's like learning English but your teacher is a native speaker that likes to speak the fastest way possible and with her accent đ
They speak on fire lmao
Would want to hear how much I can understand XDD
Wonder how long theyâve been rapping
Me pronouncing 4 characters in 4 seconds: 
Her: three sentences in that time
#đď˝english-questions this channel is now void of its purpose
Oops-
Mb, but it still serves its purpose. There's no one asking anything at the time so I wouldn't consider it illegal to have a small conversation đ sorry again
Goddamn
Well im going to sleep, nighty yâall
Nighty night, see ya tomorrow
You'll hear this said sometimes.
Hah, ty. So it is not incorrect
how do u say "what are u fighting for then?" in angry. in other words @flat rune
"What's this for, then?" or something.
I'd just say "you're doing nothing" but the above works.
oh thankyou!
u really are my life savior
Can you guys help me with the question?
what is your try?
I'll go with C, lmao
C for sure
A - Oxen are still dangerous as of right now
B - If oxen could have been fundamental to the Mesopotamians, it probably wouldn't have been listed as an example
D - Would be is just wrong as it's referring to people in the past
E - Again, oxen are still dangerous
pfttt I saw that you wrote B and instantly agreed
Hhh
I didn't see Babylon at first
mhm
So I have a question too
Is it "be diagnosed with" or "be diagnosed as"? Are they both correct or just used in different context?
Prepositions in English are so tricky
diagnosed with means to be identified with something ex. he was diagnosed with cancer
diagnosed as means the same thing but it's like... specifics? ex. he was diagnosed as a cancer patient
okay as uses a direct noun more often
it's hard to explain
like
let me give a bunch of examples
So it's "be diagnosed with a disease"
with:
He was diagnosed with autism at the early age of 5.
Many people diagnosed with lung cancer have smoked before.
as:
They are all diagnosed as diabetic.
My parents told me that I was diagnosed as sociopath by my therapist.
YEAH THAT MAKES MORE SENSE
I couldn't word it quite right
- (diagnose something as something) The illness was diagnosed as cancer.
- (diagnose somebody with something) He has recently been diagnosed with angina.
Definition of diagnose verb in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
no problem
Hi everyone, looking for someone to practice English with
please correct my grammarđ
Hi everyone!
Being
Thanks
Mom's garden
"little bit ridiculous" sounds weird, just use "don't be ridiculous"
What does "today" modifys
Today motifies held
Thanks
"During my exam week, I cried every night hysterically." is this sentence grammatically correct and sounds okay? @timber folio
I cried hysterically every night is better
and makes sense
it's adjective before verb usually
in English
other languages like French & Spanish differ
are those grammar checking websites a scam? đš (genuine question)
Hi Guys
Could you help me with one question?
What's the meaning of "crash on the couch "?
"Are you going to crash on the couch?
I don't get what crash on means.
it's just a phrase
to "crash" somewhere is to hang out there
like you might say "you mind if I come crash at your place later"
np
Typically itâs used to refer to sleeping on the couch. Usually when at a friends house. âHey man Iâve been drinking and I donât want to drive home. Mind if I crash on the couchâ
Got it. Thank you so much. Now everything makes sense
not really, but humans are a better source
Grammarly is pretty reliable just for grammar if you don't buy their premium or whatnot
default grammar checkers are also fine for spotting basic mistakes in your writing
google docs & word has built in editors
I use quillbot website
that one is for paraphrasing more
oy
what does this mean exactly?
"It is merit that explains differences of wealth between two individuals."
what does worthiness have to do with this?
It means sleep on the couch
There asking to sleep at your house
and another: what does this mean?
If you need to pay for it, don't use it.
Your sentence is fine, but it might be better to say that you were "in hysterics every night".
Honestly, I don't like using the term because it's not English, so it might be better to say "My exam week brought nothing but anguish, I cried every night."
Sure it's Latin in origin, but it's a lot more English sounding than
A word that isn't even in English 
It's okay, half of my rambling is kind of nonsense anyway.
Basically, you don't need to use "crying hysterically", just say "crying uncontrollably" or something else.
I saw someone using it and I learned it and now you say this (breaking my heart)
It isn't so much that I don't like you using it, it's more that I loathe how more of the "higher-end" English words aren't even English.
So, I generally teach people how to avoid using loanwords because at some point with them they become borderline either unintelligible or are outright extreme (hysteria means that you act like a woman, "irrationally", or with intense crying or laughter).
It used to literally be called "Woman's Disease" because only women become or can act hysterical.
oh :3
Etymology is word history. It's a Greek term.
I'm not sure what brought up this shift in English, but pretty much every "educated" term isn't English. If it refers to science or any field you would see in education, it's not really in English.
Etymos is just "word", logos is "study".
You could say "wordlore" and be just as accurate.
I always think etymology is so interesting and it helps you better understand the meaning of some words. One of my teachers told me the word 'history' is the combination of 'his' and 'story' so she think it is kinda full of sexism. But latter I searched it up on the internet. It shows that the English masculine pronoun 'his' is German origin but 'history' originated from Greek so they have no etymological connection. Now I feel like discussing the origin of 'history' with her.
It's just "ΚĎĎÎżĎÎŻÎą", literally "Istoria", but without the feminine ending.
People added the "h" because the Germans thought anything beginning with a vowel was insane or something, I guess. I genuinely don't know.
I think the meaning would be like...
"Story of learned peoples", or something, since "Istor" (in old Greek) means "expert", and "-ia" as an ending would sometimes denote a song.
Kind of like how the Iliad is called "I Ilias", "the song of Ilium".
By all means, the etymology helps. It's pretty much all I know in regards to English.
I don't know Greek lmao but everyday's a school day
Yeah that's true
Hi guys! "In fact, it's not right", "Actually, it's not right", and "If you want to race at all". What different between "In fact", "Actually" and "At all"?
They have similar meanings, but "in fact" is usually used to reinforce a previous statement, whereas "actually" is used to correct it. I've heard it both ways though so I'm not 100% sure whether there's a clear or correct difference in use
And "at all" in this sentence is just saying in anyway, if there's any possibility you want to race
"I'll race with you, if you want to race at all that is" = I will race with you if you want to race, if not, well đ¤ˇââď¸ I will race with you if you have a minimal desire to race
hi, guys! I am new here and I am not familiar to the use of discord. Now i am confused why i cannot send pictures in the channels #proofreading? The â near the placeholder is grey.đ
"in fact" is very often also used to correct a previous statement; I see it used this way all the time. From the Oxford learner's dictionary:
used to emphasize a statement, especially one that is the opposite of what has just been mentioned
I thought the work would be difficult. In actual fact, it's very easy.
You need to participate more in the text channels to get level 5 then a bot will give you the proper permissions
get it , thxđ
That's why I also added that I've seen it both ways
So they're not wrong in any case
Thank you!
Thanks!
hello! are "to put together", "to assemble" and "to set up" interchangeable?
In most cases, yes.
Exceptions are always there, but rare.
"In fact" is for emphasis.
"Actually" is to make sure someone understands the technical correctness of something.
You wouldn't say "actually, it's not right" to someone if you want to reinforce something, you would say "actually" if you want to basically say that someone is just wrong, straight-up.
Pretty much.
You'll find some contexts where "setting up" and "assembling" won't be interchangeable, but they're a little few and far between.
Thanks!
Thank you đ
Sorry for asking another question
I'm trying to understand a c1 word. Could you help me? What's a slot of time? xD
As far as I understood, it is a given period of time, in which something has to happen
Is that correct?
Yes that would be correct
You could say certain things have time slots
Could be something like an appointment where your appointment is 10am but they give you til 10.15 to show up
yeah like a time interval
đ Thank you so so much for your answers. They will help me a lot
- Him
2.Her
3.Building, action
4.eating, action
5.been, being
Whatâs the word or phrasal verb for starting, stopping, starting, stopping and starting something again and again and again in an inconsistent matter?
In other words, doing something frequently or infrequently at an irregular intervals
Isn't it "resume" ?
There are "resume", "restart" and "start again".
I'm still learner so let's wait to answers from native speakers.
This is my coursework, since English isnât my first language so there might be quite a few major issues that I canât recognize
Is it possible if someone can help me improve the places that clearly didnât make sense?
Good question. Thank you for elaborating.
I think posting the text in a more legible way and asking specific questions will help everybody help you
What is acknowledged ?
Definition of acknowledge verb in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
this may help
Thank you! ^-^
ok, sorry for being unclear earlier
It wasnât an ordinary day: rountine instructions were sent to us at the normal time, but there was something uneasy in the air. The usual greetings were nowhere to be found, but instead an order for the secret base located in Okinawa city of japan to implement ourselves immediately into defcon2. Without anytime for reactions; another piece of coded message had been received. With the same lightening speed, it was decoded. However, the relieve of believing that this is a total mistake fades slowly and painfully away. My blood was burning, as if they were racing to reach its boiling point; it was an order, for us to fire all nuclear heads located in different location. I turned around for the clock, it is currently 00:15, Tokyo time.
Time began slowing down, as my brain brought myself back to this piece of white paper, I was not convinced by the reliability. As if seeking for a rescue rod, I looked for the files containing the password for the permission of nuclear weapon usage, which were covered with dust, and waited for my next order. The next order came quickly; my heart beat increases propotionally towards every word written on the piece of paper had been read out. My colleague called attention to me, the passwords were the same. I could no longer remember how many times I went back and fourth with the password, making sure I have not made a single mistake. However, the slightest hope had been ruthlessly extinguished by a phone call from the rest of the combat team, questioning of the recent order. This was not a mistake. I hestitated, more than I should have done. To my surprise, none of the target were located in the soviet union, with a mindset of avoiding any chances of pulling the world into hot water, I once again questioned the authenticity of this order with my colleagues, but was answered with no hope to grab onto. Staring again into the clock unconsciously, the current time displayed was 00:17.
As if the existance of sound had vanished, the ringing tone of the telephone was hurting my ears. 'It might be that the opponents had already began a nuclear war', 'Maybe our operationer was in a rush and forgot'. More answers to my question of why there was no warning for this action came quickly from my colleagues with equally shivering voice. Shooking my head again; I was not convinced. The pressure was immeasurable, almost unimaginable how this much pressure was able to form onto my body with tiny area; I reached again for the telephone, but a scream violently brought me out of fear. "PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE ANY LONGER", I was stunned by the power of his words, but I was told on his target list, all 4 targets were indeed located in the soviet union. 'It is currently 00:30 tokyo time, it is currently 00:30 tokyo time', the radio repeats itself with a voice of a man.
'Grab the weapons, shoot that officer dead at once if any actions to fire the nuclear weapon was seen'. Seven long minutes have passed, finally clearing off my last doubts, I could not pay the price of spending more time. The telephone was picked up once again by myself, I decided to put this in a final gamble. Slowly typing in the number I had not once called, I dialed the highest chief in charge of this particular operation. Although I was frightened, but I was not hesitant. 'EITHER CHANGE THE CURRENT ALERT STATE TO DEFCON1 OR CANCEL THE FIRING', I did not care of the consequences of speaking with no manner. I wanted an answer. For myself and for the people who will be suffering the aftermaths of a mere accident. Time flowed slowly, tremendously slowly, on the other side of the phone, there were no answer. 'STOP THE FIRING AT ONCE'. The echo of this voicing reached deeply into my heart. There were no celebrations, there were no cheers; but only the sound of a man from the radio announcing the time of 00:45, and a sound of relieve as the gunners removed their rifles from me and my colleagues.
Iâm wondering if there is any phrases or sentences that didnât make sense or was unclear when you guys are reading it, if so can you tell me it or suggest another phrase in contrast to what I have written?
or any vocab that I should change
and is there any places I should add a particular phrase to make the piece of written better and more intense?
thanks ><
Since English is a foreign language to me so mistakes might be common
It wasn't an ordinary day; routine instructions were sent to us the same time as normal, but there was something uneasy in the air, a feeling I just couldn't shake off. The usual greetings were noewhere to be found, but instead for us to relocate ourselves immediately into defcon2, a secret base in Okinawa, Japan. Without any time for reactions, another piece of coded message had been received. With the same lightning speed, it was decoded. However, the relieve of believing that this was a total mistake slowly and painfully faded away. My blood was heating up, racing to reach its boiling point; it was an order for us to fire each and every nuclear head to a differnet location. I turned around to the clock; 00:15, Tokyo time.
Time began slowly down as my brain brought me back to the piece of white paper, yet still unconvinced by its reliability. As if seeking for a rescue rod, I looked for the files containing the password that permitted usage of nuclear weapons. Hidden away in a safe, a thin layer of dust had formed, and I waited for my next order. The next one came quickly. My heartbeat increased proportionally as each word was read out. My colleague snapped his fingers for my attention, but I was too distracted by what had hit me. Reality. The passwords were the same, nothing out of place or wrong.
Uh, can I ask, wdym by "the passwords were the same"?
so basically during the war
they will have a sheet of password
if they recieved the same password/letters from the commanders
they will have to do what it was original said on their piece of password
I could no longer remember how many times I scanned the text, letter by letter, making sure that I hadn't made a mistake. However, the slightest sliver of hope I had was extinguished by a phone call from the other combat team, questioning the recent order. This was not a mistake.
I hesistated, much more than I should have at that moment. I was trained for moments like these, yet the panic was settling in, adrenaline filling up my veins. To my surpise and great relief, none of the targets were located in the Soviet Union. With a mindset of avoiding my chances of pulling the world into hot water, I once again questioned the authenticity of this order with my collegaues, but was answered with still no hope to grab onto. Staring into the clock unconsciously again, the current time displayed was 00:17; only two minutes had passed, yet it felt like two hours.
Uhhh...
so like
thanks I kind of just spammed the colons and semi colons xd
during war
people have a password
if they receive the same password from the higher ups
they need to do what is instructed alongside the password
on the original paper?
and every individual possesses one
but I explained it horribly
yeah I saw lmao
every individual group
I'll try to adjust it more to what I understand
and uh
mc and his colleagues
they are
a group
yes
maybe I need a better word for colleagues
yes
yes
combat group
mmmmmmm okay then
I based this off a real story
Iâm trying to describe the intensity of them going against their higher ups to do what they believed was right
mmmmmmmmmmmm not quite getting the hang of this but I'll continue
my friend said the exact same to me at school lol
does anyone here familiar with forensic linguistic?
I feel like what I did was more like writing a descriptive written on another perspective instead of a creative writting
no but I can give whatever that is a try if you want?
@waxen mural Man, it's dragging too long but you do you
about the uh
soviet union thing
first you said
the bombs weren't going there to avoid world war whatever
but now all four targets are there???
all 4 targets were indeed located in the soviet union.
To my surprise, none of the target were located in the soviet union
gonna proofread smth else brb
sorry I was reading the text u wrote
lol i think I just wrote it so unclearly
I was trying to show
yeah take ur time
that in my combat group, we got an order to fire not to the USSR
yeah
...
I wanted to show that this is clearly a mistake
lol I wrote it so terribly
it took me like
5 minutes to realize what I was trying to write
and I wrote the damn thing lol
what do you think are the challenges of forensic stylistics?
I was stunned by the power of his words, but as stated on his target list, all four targets were indeed located in the Soviet Union. "it is currently half psat twelve, Tokyo time, it is currently half past twelve, Tokyo time," the radio repeated itself in a monotone voice.
As if the existence of sound had vanished, the irritating noise of the telephone stopped. 'It mig
WHAT THE HECK
ARE YOU WRITING
@waxen mural
you repeated that paragraph twice
As if the existance of sound had vanished, the ringing tone of the telephone was hurting my ears. 'It might be that the opponents had already began a nuclear war', 'Maybe our operationer was in a rush and forgot'. More answers to my question of why there was no warning for this action came quickly from my colleagues with equally shivering voice. Shooking my head again; I was not convinced. The pressure was immeasurable, almost unimaginable how this much pressure was able to form onto my body with tiny area; I reached again for the telephone, but a scream violently brought me out of fear. "PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE ANY LONGER", I was stunned by the power of his words, but I was told on his target list, all 4 targets were indeed located in the soviet union. 'It is currently 00:30 tokyo time, it is currently 00:30 tokyo time', the radio repeats itself with a voice of a man.```
differet meanings
???
yup nope I'm lost sorry I don't know
I had to adjust it to word limit
I'd do research but it's really damn late
oh, it's okay thanks
P2
The first one was my very first draft I had no idea how it got here
mk
@waxen mural does the telephone keep ringing
or does it shut up
since sound is gone
but it's ringing
keeps ringing
Iâm trying to persent a feeling of
Iâm distracted
so distracted that
ah okay so he's concentrated on the ringing
although a loud sound is present but I canât hear it
trust me I have some really cringe worthy writing only a year back
I like your writing
bit of a drag, but it's more descriptive than my fast paced plots
haha thanks
@waxen mural
I am once again lost.
so your combat group got orders to not fire to the USSR so ur panicking???
but you looked for the passwords to allow access to the nuclear weapons
and you're supposed to fire
why were you panicking-
confusion intensifies
I think I was trying to say
since this was during the Cold War
themcwas on the US side
The mc was
and it was very surprising that since the USSR was their biggest enemy
but the targets were not on the USSR
but on other countries
so letâs say like Mexico
so the mc is panicking since Mexico is a neutral country
not involved
just a note that my history is nonexistant but I'll try to follow along
more like a weird target location
thatâs why he was questioning the legitimacy
since it was weird to fire weapons at countries that was not involved
while in contrast the other group wanted to fire since their target is in the USSR, which was their enemy, so it makes sense
lemme shorten this to English lol
USSR= BAD to them
non USSR = good
so why fire the good
yes gotcha I'll continue my writing
ok xd
and hope it makes sense
nonetheless it would be many times better than mine anyways lol
at least the English part now make sense
This tale is all over the place.
yeah I was told this too
but because my teacher limited the word to 700-1000
I couldnât write too much about what is going on
sorry it might be very confusing
I think I have to improve on the settings
It's all fine. Give me a minute, I'll make the words more efficient.
For what?
for the entire kinda nonsensical plot all over the place
to be honest with you this was originally on paper
Nonsensical..?
but my teacher was confused by both my hand writing and this weird plot
so I was forced to write on one note again lol
Idk man a nuke going from JP to RU is a pretty normal idea.
That's literally the only reason the USA colonised Japan.
The plot isn't really nonsensical, no. The descriptions are wonky, but that's fine. They can be trimmed and enhanced.
I think it was more because of how I described the event
Tbh the only lines I needed were:
"none of the targets were in the USSR"
Makes perfect sense to me because the American Empire only utilised missiles for the Soviets. Iran, Congo, Japan, etc., were all either established by troops or money.
The idea of tossing a nuke literally anywhere but RU was so terrifying that it got General MacArthur fired during the Vietnam war.
He wanted to nuke China to stop them from flooding 'nam.
what is ânam
American slang for Vietnam.
oh
Anyway, give me a bit to finish up some things and I'll fix up the writing.
Thank you, with @timber folio I can probably summarize all the corrections and make it much better
If I'm misremembering that it was Vietnam, it was probably Korea.
The USA doesn't keep the Korean war in the education system, so the only war info I know is from my family history, since everyone on my father's side participated in every war the USA fought.
@waxen mural I finished and I'll send it in a second but like
'Grab the weapons, shoot that officer dead at once if any actions to fire the nuclear weapon was seen'. Seven long minutes have passed, finally clearing off my last doubts, I could not pay the price of spending more time. The telephone was picked up once again by myself, I decided to put this in a final gamble. Slowly typing in the number I had not once called, I dialed the highest chief in charge of this particular operation. Although I was frightened, but I was not hesitant. 'EITHER CHANGE THE CURRENT ALERT STATE TO DEFCON1 OR CANCEL THE FIRING', I did not care of the consequences of speaking with no manner. I wanted an answer. For myself and for the people who will be suffering the aftermaths of a mere accident. Time flowed slowly, tremendously slowly, on the other side of the phone, there were no answer. 'STOP THE FIRING AT ONCE'. The echo of this voicing reached deeply into my heart. There were no celebrations, there were no cheers; but only the sound of a man from the radio announcing the time of 00:45, and a sound of relieve as the gunners removed their rifles from me and my colleagues.
so like
gunners got sent to their location
tysm it honestly helped a lot
and uh
mc called higher ups
the chief told him to change whatsit or cancel whatsit
he didn't care about talking but he didn't talk???
and after 7 minutes or something the higher up said stop firing
and the gunners retreated
what
explain
please
yup lol
so firstly
the mc told the chief to change
because he needs his order
alert state defcon1 is to ensure firing
so he wanted the higher up to tell him face to face that this was not a mistake
this was talking about the CHANGE blah blah blah
change what... ;-;
the 7 minutes was a plot device but I was trying to say like the chief was making sure whatâs going on, to emphasize this was a mistake as he had no idea
okay okay okay
gunner was sent by the other group, they retreated as they was already in the mc room, they also heard the higher up saying this was a mistake
so orders were sent to stop mc from firing the weapon, seven minutes passed, he called higher up and asked abt the order, got the order to change the alert state/cancel the firing. slowed time, stop firing, guns down, day saved
is that it
no
wait lemme explain the whole thing with better English
okay
order was send by other groups to force mc to fire his weapons
as the gunners were coming, he dialed the higher ups contact
and questions the legitimacy of the very first order
if the nuclear bombs were supposed to be fired in the first place
after 7 minutes, the higher up said it was a mistake
there was no such order in the first place
ah okay
no nuclear bombs are fired
okay
day saved
do you want to include the direct dialogue of questioning the order
or just
subconciously mention it
this
okay
@waxen mural
fun
not even perfect
but
it should be 90% more understandable
yk
good enough
more than enough honestly
xD no problem
saved my life
have fun not dying
hmu any time if you need more help deciphering your writing
I'd be honoured to read more writing of yours
Deciphering is honestly the best word to describe my writing
pain reading it even for myself
so is my handwriting
@waxen mural I was giving this a cursory overview before writing it and noticed that you made DEFCON-2 the focal point for firing a missile.
I'm making this dilemma a little more specific in my edit of the paper, because DEFCON-2 just means "put soldiers there", not "fire nuclear warheads".
I've sent my edit as a TXT.
oh i didnt know that
from my research
what was defcon 1?
Yeah. Cuba was on DEFCON 2 for a while when the crisis began.
DEFCON 1 is "all hope is lost, toss every missile we have."
DECFON 2 is "send armed forces."
yes i think what i was trying to say is
the higher up send this decfon 2, however they wanted them to send the missiles
so they were confused
Yeah. I just made that more overt.
ok
wow
you created so much more tension to the story
thanks
my original lacked the tension and many more details
Np.
If you was to say the first one you would say "Did he die?"
The first is when you would ask what happened to someone. The second is what you would say for confirmation or for emphasis.
oops sorry mb!
does "tell me straight" sound okay in English? like when I want somebody to tell me about something without beating around the bush.
So for example: "I think you're not interested in playing with me anymore. If that's the case just tell me straight and I'll look for somebody else to play with"
Yes you can say it that way
Thank you! đť
Hola soy de argentina quienme enseĂąa hablar ingles
2
OK, I will answer the others and you tell me if they are correct. Pls 
This is correct ?
#2 is wrong
is "did you live"
Yes thatâs correct
Okay : )
Whatâs the other option for #5
Other than shone
was shining
Thatâs the correct answer
Does it tell you which ones were incorrect?
how did you make this kind of text here on Discord?
Does "heading to somewhere" sound natural? Do you know if it's good grammar?
guys, can anyone tell me what ''Deadly Decadence'' means?
Do you mean like saying. âIm heading to the store?â If so then yes. Itâs what a native would say
Decadence is excessive indulgence.
Honestly yes but i would remove the âtoâ
So
Is "I'm heading the store" correct?
I'm asking because I have a grammar checker, and it says that adding the preposition "to" is incorrect, even though it sounds weird to me because of my native language
It should be âIâm heading to the storeâ


