#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
so if i want to show to my friend Tenacious D beezleboss who's native in english, it'll be understanble for her without text?
yes
mmm I still think she'll understand it
okay i think that too
i found a high defenition version of this song without lyrics but its slightly delayed
daang
stairs and staircase are the same?
short answer yes, long answer is that a staircase is the whole structure, which is comprised of stairs. one half of a staircase is still stairs. two stairs is still stairs
Are As and Because interchangable? Is there any cases in which As can not be used to substitute Because?
what does it mean if someone has a pulse?
"he thinks that any female with pulse is hot"
oh okay
I would call this conversational English. You omitted the subject. Every native speaker would understand you, but your teacher wouldn't want you to write like this.
Actually, you're right. If she is breathing, she is hot. If she has a heart beat (pulse), he thinks she is hot.
Which one is correct ? 1. I just have talked or 2. I have just talked. For example - with my wife.
2
I think number 2. Thank you very much.
They are basically the same. Beneath is more formal and less common
hey any one here !
I tend to agree with the person above. Just off the top of my head the difference is in how we use the words. 1. It's nice and cozy here beneath the covers. ( I think this expression is fairly common but could sound a little formal. I can also say under the covers=more common, standard.) 2. There is a lot of dust beneath my bed. =sounds a little formal (It would be more common to say under my bed.) 3. Miners work below ground. (I wouldn't use beneath) 4. It is below zero today. It's kind of cold. (Again, I wouldn't say under or beneath)
Can somebody tell me the difference and when it is better to say which one and when? How are they connected or How are they connecting or How do they connect? Translate shows the How are they connected.
Clinging to the United States to seek “independence” is a dead end, and attempts to use the Taiwan question to contain China are doomed to failure.
"doomed to failure"? or should it be "doomed to fail"?
Q2. Answer is B.
Q.8 Answer is A.
Q.3 Answer is A.
Q.10 Answer is A.
Q.6 Answer is A.
Q.7 Answer is A.
Q.4 Answer is D.
Q.1 Answer is D.
Q.5 answer is A.
Ya Welcome.
Q.9 Answer is D.
"to get to the truth" or "to get at the truth",which one is correct?and why?
1 . I want to talk with people. or 2. I want to talk to people. Which one is correct ?
I think both is correct but we should use number two only when we want to talk (now) i mean in - this moment. Am i right ? or Am i wrong ?
or mb i should use "need" instead of "want" idk really
So I've been reading Guns, Germs, and Steel; I've came across this sentence:
"Sound evidence for the existence of human differences in intelligence that parallel human differences in technology is lacking."
What exactly does this mean?
I have no idea.
I suppose it's meant to look weird, so it's hard to tell
Hello everyone. A quick question:
In the word working, the ng part makes the [ŋ] sound, right?
I wonder: what sound does n' make in workin'?
I haven't read this book so I might be missing context but my best guess is:
"There is not good evidence that differences in technology are caused by differences in intelligence"
"In the toilet" "on the toilet"
Which one is grammarly correct?
On the toilet, if you were "in the toilet" then you'd b drowning by now
Can the word "hit" mean "get"
"let's hit the road" as in "let's get to the road"
do people still say "never mind" meaning "not to mention"
work-en
yes
better to say let's hit the road tho
people mostly say nevermind to get off a topic. a lot of people say "also," if you're trying to recall something
what about this
yes
np
It is not very common, no. In this case, it's taking the spot of "not to mention".
"Never mind" in this context is saying "not to mention".
It's not too common, no, because "never mind" with a space is an archaic saying meaning to pay no attention to something.
From what I googled it's a scientific term
I'm having a hard time understanding what he means by "human differences in technology". Human differences in intelligence means humans have different levels of intelligence, probably because of what's in our brain, in our body. Human levels of technology=? My body doesn't have any technology built into it. If he means humans have different levels of understanding how to use technology, ok. Also, the word parallel is tricky. It seems to mean these two human differences work together while remaining separate. I think it means we need more research to prove how smart you are shows how much technology you know how to use. 😅
what that means is there is no evidence to suggest that difference in technological advancement of different societies implies a difference in average intelligence level of people in those societies
The n in workin' is just n. I think you have to look at the i sound in both words. They could be different sounds. working=very short i sound; workin'=the i could be short i or schwa. Many people say kun.
You really need context. i'm not British but "toilet" means washroom for British people. I'm going to the toilet means I'm going to the washroom. So, I could imagine: Don't bother me i'm in the toilet just means i'm in the washroom. In the toilet also means I have a big problem. I made a mistake. I'm in trouble. I'm on the toilet sounds more like American English and it means literally sitting on the toilet in the washroom. We avoid using the word toilet because that is tmi. I don't usually want to tell you what I am doing in the washroom.
How about rest room?
Grammatically, they are both correct. 1. Is friendly. You will talk and let the other person talk. And you will also listen to them when they talk. 2. You want to do the talking. It usually sounds unfriendly because you are focused just on you. I guess it means you want to practise your speaking ability, but it can seem like you are being selfish because you don't care about the other person. If they talk, you might not listen, because your goal is to talk. "I need to talk to you" means you are in trouble.
American English. They also say bathroom for the same thing. I'm Canadian so we use a lot of American English sprinkled with British English and a dash of Canadianisms.
@hazy turret i think it's also a good idea to highlight that while what coolcat is saying is technically true, you should not always assume that it is going to be true for the person you're talking with. e.g. if someone, especially someone not native, says "i need to talk to you" that does not automatically imply that they are in trouble, it may just mean they want to chat, even if the underlying tone might suggest otherwise.
In Canada, a restroom is only in a restaurant. Restaurants in Canada also use the word washroom. It's rare to use the word bathroom unless there is an actual bath tub in the room.
Furthermore, that applies to every correction I make. And, I should add a Canadian flag to my name because what I say would be different from other native speakers. Edit: oh, i don't really need the flag, if you click on my name, it says Canadian English.
it's just a good idea to remember that while rules exist and it's great to know them, not everyone abides by strict definitions of words and phrases especially in informal english
sometimes trying to distinguish very specific meanings of slightly different phrases is counterproductive to actually understanding people
Thx for the explanation and the reason I asked is because in Danish language "in" means "i" and "on" means "på". We can't say "i toilet" which is grammarly wrong and people will laugh at it too and I wanted to know it in English too.
Toilet is commonly used in Danish language but thx for letting me know to use washroom

I on the other hand, think each individual should correct how they want to using their personal background and leave it up to the questioner to take it or leave it. I like variety. Unless the questioner asks for an informal response, I will answer however I please. And I recommend you do the same. That way we will get a more-correct answer.
oh no i'm not saying you're answering people incorrectly, i just want to say that some of these questions border on like esoteric knowledge that one shouldn't expect random people to know and use, so it's important for people asking questions to remember that just because something is technically true and the proper way to speak, oftentimes whoever they're speaking with won't be aware of it
Yes, definitely, Tone is so important to how you say "I need to talk to you" Serious tone=you're in trouble.
thank youu, and also answering your question about "Human levels of technology," I'm sure it means different civilizations have different levels of technology. For example, Africans have a lower level of technology than, let's say, Americans.
Well, that's a relief. I tend to like to write lengthy answers because I'm sometimes not sure what people are really asking. What do you mean by "random" do you mean people asking, people answering or people you might talk to as you go about your day? The word "random" can have a negative connotation. What do you mean by "whoever" you're speaking with? Do you mean other language learners or the random people or both? I often get caught up in the minutia, especially when i have some free time. 😆
"random people" is referring to those who the people asking questions here could be having conversations with online or in person, so basically just whoever they could be talking with
Oh. Thank you for that clarification. How did you correct my "you"? I made a mistake. I shouldn't have written "you" in my answer above. You haven't chosen a role. Your punctuation is great, so you must be a native speaker that cares about punctuation.
haha yeah, I am a native speaker! :))
But. How did you correct my "you". I have a suggestion, but I'm a teacher so I don't want to give you my answer until you tell me what you think: I think it means we need more research to prove how smart YOU are shows how much technology YOU know how to use.
This is my answer to your original question: I think it means we need more research to prove how smart YOU are shows how much technology YOU know how to use. I think my answer is correct but after reading your clarification I need to change the words "you" in my answer to another word.
ohh
yeah got it
let me think abt it
well the whole sentence is written quite weird
so i have to change quite a bit
my sentence is written weird? 😭 blocked forever
I think it means we need more research to prove how smart one is, in correspondence, to how much technology they know how to use.
LMFAOO
this is how i would write it
I should change you to "peoples"
no change you to "one"
whatever
I think it means we need more research to prove how smart one is, corresponds to how much technology they know how to use.=how about this one?
yeh. me too. but because of what you wrote about comparing Americans with other people...
yeah, this works too, i believe!
they did in fact use "peoples" in the original "guns germs and steel" book though
in short, possess means to have, obsess means to think of
that is true
they did
gee thanks. good luck with that assignment.
thanks!
Further to that, obsess means to not be able to stop thinking of that😉
Yeah, and also you could say "be possessed by", in that case the meaning is very similar to "be obsessed with"
now that i think about it, maybe this was the question? What's the difference between these two terms
i don't really know myself if there is any significant difference there
yeh, but they didn't ask about that, did they?😆 ( i hope you can understand my sense of humour!!)
yes. As you just noticed, one question leads to more. That's why i would like a pinned message on this page, for students to add context to their questions.
What is your precise question?
what's the difference, if any, between "be possessed by something" and "be obsessed with something"
i should also add that i don't mean "possessed" as in some evil spirit controlling you, but rather something occupying your thoughts
- Think of scary movies. The bad spirit enters my body and makes me do crazy things. haha. too late.
What other possessed by is there?
I would say no. There is no possessed by your thoughts. It's obsessed by your thoughts. (maybe with, but I have to think about that.
something like "he was possessed by the idea of getting rich"
which is basically the same as "he was obsessed with the idea of being rich'
- no. 2. yes.
by "no" do you mean that sentence is wrong?
yes.
because i didn't think of it myself i took it from a dictionary
if we go on wiktionary it does have it too https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/possess for example on wiktionary we have some quotes from literature with that word being used this way
The only way it could be correct, in my opinion, is if there is a crazy spirit in you too.
i'm thinking of the #2 definition on wiktionary that goes "Of an idea, thought, etc.: to dominate (someone's mind); to strongly influence."
truth be told, in that Shakespeare quote he does use "possessed with" not "by" so maybe the preposition is flexible but the meaning stays true
and the exact sentence i used was taken from here https://www.dictionary.com/browse/possessed--by
Possessed by definition at Dictionary.com, a free online dictionary with pronunciation, synonyms and translation. Look it up now!
I can't find this reference. #2 where? Is it literature? Which writer? Where did you get this example: he was possessed by the idea of getting rich
All of these examples are "something" similar to a crazy spirit is taking control of your body. The emotion is taking away your control, ok. It doesn't have to be an actual demon, but it is the same.
I love Shakespeare, but it's a damn old example. not current usage.
so if an emotion can take away your rational thinking akin to a demon, can an idea do the same?
maybe. I need an example.
I can't go to this link. but I also don't want this link. lol
can you see this one https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/possess
Where did you get this example: he was possessed by the idea of getting rich
Where did you get this example: he was possessed by the idea of getting rich???
i took it from that website you can't open for some reason
not sure why
probably a location issue
this is what it shows for me
this goes in line with the Cambridge dictionary definition
So, this clarifies what i said. It's like a demon inside him, so it is excessive. not a literal demon. AND this example is from the 1500s!!! SO, NOT common usage.
well the shakespeare example is from the 1500s but it does have some modern day quotes too
what we're discussing here is whether you can use "possessed by an idea" interchangeable with "obsessed with an idea"
from what i see in the dictionaries it is possible
And what would you say is the difference?
i don't know. That was my original question
maybe there is no difference
thats why i asked, because i wanted to know if the difference exists and if it does then what it is
I would say using "possessed by" because of the idea of a demon taking over your body is not so common these days. So, it includes loss of control and horror. Obsessed by is just thinking about it a lot, you can't stop thinking about it. no horror. maybe with possessed by, you can blame it on the demon.
i see, so the difference is that possessed implies a more sinister event than obsessed
makes sense
I wouldn't say it like that. Because when i own something, i bought it so i want it. In this case, it would be better to say having "someone or even an idea" in you that you don't want and you can't control.
Hello. Could someone please explain to me why his wish is in past tense and not present or future?
"I wish I was handsome"
i can't tell you exactly why that is how it's used, but that is definitely the correct way to say it. Read more here https://www.ecenglish.com/learnenglish/lessons/wish-past-verb#:~:text=In English%2C we use wish,my mom and studied harder.
Learn English. 1 FREE English lesson added every single day. Grammar, vocabulary, listening & reading
something about it being a "wish" or a "hypothesis" makes it become past tense
it can get even more confusing if you add more layers to the sentence, e.g. "I wish i was handsome, but i am not"
now suddenly it starts in past tense but then jumps back to present tense
Nice!! I get it now! There are even exercises to practice. Thank you so much! ✨ @vocal pollen 
hey can someone help me understand a segment from the book Guns, Germs, and Steel?
Can your reply with the segment you are referring to? 
sure
"It's easy to recognize two reasons why my impression that New Guineans are smarter than Westerners may be correct. First, Europeans have for thousands of years been living in densely populated societies with central governments, police, and judiciaries. In those societies, infectious epidemic diseases of dense populations (such as smallpox) were historically the major cause of death, while murders were relatively uncommon and a state of war was the exception rather than the rule. Most Europeans who escaped fatal infections also escaped other potential causes of death and proceeded to pass on their genes. Today, most live-born Western infants survive fatal infections as well and reproduce themselves, regardless of their intelligence and the genes they bear. In contrast, New Guineans have been living in societies where human numbers were too low for epidemic diseases of dense populations to evolve. Instead, traditional New Guineans suffered high mortality from murder, chronic tribal warfare, accidents, and problems in procuring food."
I truly don't understand his reasoning, and why this has any correlation in terms of "intelligence"
thank you in advance if you're able to help me
what he implies there is that in western societies a person does not need to be smart in order to escape death by disease, war or otherwise
while in the guinean society in order to live long enough to pass your genes, you need to have high enough intelligence to escape death
so in the guinean society only high IQ genes get passed while in western society any genes get passed
Hello, I have a question. Now that I'm in college they taught me that when I want to speak in future I can use the -ing form to speak about something already decided is going to be done, something certain, and Going to when I'm going to speak about something less certain, they haven't taught us Will yet, but when I was in High School and earlier, they taught that when I want to speak in future I can use both Going to and Will, Going to when is certain and Will when is less certain, they never mentioned about the -ing form, or I don't remember, probably the second 
How exactly does this work? All 3: -ing, Going to and Will, things got a bit messy on my end and I'm a bit confused.
whats biased in simple words
-> Were is used for situations where it is impossible to happen.
-> Was is used for situations where it is possible to happen.
-
-ing verbs can be either present tense or serve as nouns.
-
"Going to" and "Will" are relatively interchangeable.
Seeing one side or idea as innately superior due to outside reasons.
Effectively, being unfair.
whats innately in simple words
Inherently.
Woah! I had no idea about it. Imma go deep into this. Thanks a lot 
it doesn't mean that it's impossible, it means it's uncertain or hypothetical. it's the subjunctive mood
a property that you cannot separate from the thing you're describing. for example, a circle is inherently round, meaning you cannot have a pointy circle.
A hypothetical scenario, at least when the term is used this way, is relegated solely to the mind. Its properties are non-existent and often follow no semblance of rules.
The purpose one wishes for something is because it is, loosely, because it is impossible to attain otherwise.
There was a post that delved more into the possible/impossible aspect of "If I were/was", but I cannot remember it at the moment.
Ah, those are the terms. "Unreal conditionals" and "real conditionals".
yeah it's like an alternate circumstance. if it were sunday i would go to my favorite indian restaurant. that's not to say that it's impossible for sunday to happen, it's just that it isn't sunday
yeah i think our phrasing was just different. same idea in the end
Thanks.
So, if I say "I'm visiting my grandma this weekend", it's wrong?
that's correct
have a dream today, son (?) like i never heard this
yes I've never heard that either
So... It's ok or not? 
It is okay
hello lovely people, could you please explain the meaning of this sentence to me?
"The viciously privative employment of abstract characters and class names is, I'm persuaded, one of the great original sins of the rationalistic mind"
in plain EWnglish please
can i use the word cope on daily-use? Is a formal word to use?
what is 'privative'?
(of an action or state) marked by the absence, removal, or loss of some quality or attribute that is normally present.
I don't understand that, to complicated for me
okay then i'll leave it to answer to someone else
have you tried googling?
Like tewlad's answer, being privative means not having a characteristic/trait that something usually has
I guess if I had an example, you can think of a "privative soldier" as a soldier who doesn't have bravery, patriotism,... normally associated with being a soldier
I'm pretty sure the word privative isn't supposed to be used to describe people though
@supple hollywhat is an abstarct character?
What is the context here? Is it about coding/programming?
looks like it yes
Character here is like a letter, number or symbol (@#$%&)
Abstract means it is not clearly defined, hard to understand, or just strange/weird
no, not coding, that's from William James, 19th century philosopher
philosophers and their needlessly eloquent ramblings
anyway what is an abstract character in eloquent ramblings of a philosopher?
as simple as you can
and what is class names?
I have no idea
sure you underestimate yourself, you know what an abstract character is
@supple hollyan abstarct charcater is supposed to be an abstarct man or abstarct woman
@supple holly that act in a story in a specific manner
yes?
@supple hollyhere's what I have found
@supple holly your explanation of privatively was helpful
I swear to god
I'm Canadian. So, if I say Canada is the best country. My opinion is biased. What I say is strongly influenced by what I know, where I live. So, I'm being unfair, because I have not lived in other countries to really know the truth. So, I can't really compare with other countries, because I don't know enough about them.
Actually, the grammar is wrong here. It's supposed to be "I wish I were..." It's called the subjunctive. We use I wish+ past tense to talk about hypothetical/unreal situations. (If+past tense=hypothetical/unreal, also) The guy thinks he is not handsome=real situation. (I am handsome=unreal situation, but to explain this we use "I wish") His desire is to be handsome.
@flat rune how do you pronounce
"19th" is it like nineteent?
- -ing form to speak about something already decided like a plan: I'm going to a party this weekend. (pre arranged.) I'm meeting him at 10. (same) 2. be going to (less certain future?; maybe they meant intention) I'm going to buy a new dress. (I might not follow through) BUT be going to is also use for plans: I'm going to go to the meeting. I'm going to go to that party. 3. I disagree. I think will is used to mean certain. I will do it. (100% intention to do it at the time of speaking)
No.
"Nineteen-th"
I have a question. A sentence "Just because I don't say it doesn't mean that I hate you". Is the first part of the sentence a noun clause?
Also, can I conclude that "because" can be used to connect a noun clause and an independent clause?
As verbs the difference between influence and effect is that influence is to affect by gentle action; to exert an influence upon; to modify, bias, or sway; to persuade or induce while effect is to make or bring about; to implementation.
oh an affect
my bad
trynna find the better one
Influence has two main connotations that affect doesn't. The first is that of relation to process rather than state, so that something might affect a rock but rarely would circumstances arise where we could speak of that rock being influenced. The second, and weaker, connotation is of emotive response being involved; this is probably the connotation that makes it feel less appropriate to use in reference to a bike's performance. (We do speak of mechanistic processes being influenced, though, especially complex ones.)
@cedar loom
is this good
ehhh
I read a review about a series and the text mentioned a rich boy who was in debt after his father death, and I saw this sentence " he is saddled with enormous debt". What does it mean?
Saddle is what they put on a horse to ride it
So basically the metaphor here is that the debt is weighing him down I guess
is "possess" is an epic word for "have" or what?
Yes.
"Affect" means that something is altered or implemented directly.
"Influence" means that something is altered or implemented indirectly.
Basically, their only difference is that the former is a stronger version of the latter.
"He was saddled with X" is an older statement that means one is forced to carry a burden and keep it with him.
It is suggesting that he has no choice in the matter.
"Possess" and "have" are different in a few ways. Beyond "have" being casual and, well, having thousands of uses, "possess" generally refers to something more personal or spiritual in reference to ownership.
"She has confidence."
"She possesses confidence."
The former sounds weak, the latter sounds absolute. However, there are also cases of:
"She is possessed."
One cannot use "She is haved" here.
In most contexts, "possess" is the "cool" version of "have", because "have" is an Old English word, and "Possess" is a Latin term. This means that "Possess" was introduced into the English language later, and it held more prestige at the time.
You will run into this issue often in English, because Latin, French, and Old English used to be completely separate. However, when Middle English came along, and Early Modern English made the changes concrete, these various languages simply combined, to the point that the terms' only difference, truly, was the social class of the speaker.
so possess is aquire?
you said one cannot say she is haved
but what about she had
She had to do something
She had an object
She has to do something
She has an object
I possess the need to do something
I possess an object
I am possessed by a ghost
I possessed the need to do something
I possessed an object
I was possessed by a ghost
Thank you
"Possessed" in the example means that her self was overtaken. "Possessed" can be used to refer to ownership in a deeper sense than "have".
What does that mean?
I have heard someone saying "....."
Is this sentence grammatically correct?
go ahead and ask away
because practice is a thing i guess
i imagine when you leave you talk in your native tongue
so you just rewire your brain
i know i've been using a Windows PC for 20 years, then switched to a MacOS one for a week. When i got the Windows one back i felt like i forgot everything about how to use it
Same, this happens to me when i get gap even not long i get worse in speaking
Hey Poo
heyyy
Yes, i was thinking the same 😂
And we recognized each other
Just dont take a gap
i dont think thats a "learning english" issue, i think its more of a general issue
I just want more people around me who cannot speak my mother tongue so i can forcefully speak in eng
might want to identify it by name and look online for fixes
Thats the reason
Probably
I have also the same issue, because i think we more perceive through litening even though when we dont talk a lot but we listen them everyday
@vocal pollen what does that mean?
I mean the usage of gerund of "saying"
Watching English videos is passive=so you can't learn much. Using discord=active, you learn more.
the natural order of learning english is
1-listen like all baby first listen to their parents
2-speak. Aftr listening they start speaking
3- higher (writing and reading)
You said you did.
Yeah, but i think series can help
I totally agree. listening to a series, especially if your level is high enough and you have the subtitles turned off is a great listening activity.
listen to YouTube videos
Yeahhh
its all about listening bro just listen more even a good speaker are good listener
I on the other hand, watch a lot of k-dramas with the English subtitles on, so my Korean still sucks. AND i'm not learning much.
Oh, i press wrong
I agree and #4 teaching English will improve your English skill. That's why teachers try to get students to do a bit of this during class time.
How long you have been practicing ?
What is "you just put it at the end of a sentence or like?" I don't really get it
Ohhh wwoo
Also, I would recommend writing in more complete sentences.
So, is it correct that the way I use the gerund "saying"?
I had a session and i felt everyone was good at speaking else me , i feel bad little i just thought i should quiet myself but you just not need to rush, it will come slowly with consistency
See. you wrote a complete sentence. keep it up!

I feel i just need to come on discord everyday most of hours rather than going university
So i would more good in english
No, i didn't
I know you know. I was emphasizing that fact. Edit: I realize that it is a bit tricky to respond to the correct person when using this program. but try a little harder. it's possible to learn that. Also, it seems the way you are writing here you are writing quickly without thinking enough first. Maybe that's one of your big problems with learning a language. Slow down.
nice
help me in making sentence "do away with"
Yeah i also listen it newly
Haaha its ok just say it
Do away with means get rid of
Like end something
Ohhh no no
you can be more good here i swear
Dont compare
Mostly ppl here are from very long time and some are native
Dont compare
Same here🥺
Bro you and I are same
Thats why i was saying i dont wanna go uni
I just wanna stay here until i become so much good in it
Bcz if i go, i would meet ppl who will not speak eng and they will talk in my mother tongue
Yeah
This is also the problm

But we can give one hour daily i guess
Atleast must
Haha
Just normalize it
You know i just lose my friends
Due to it because i had less interest match with thm
Due to less interaction or connection
Whtever it was
Haha it is what it is
Lolz😂

Nothing can happen with the brain now it just stick
dont underestimate yourself
You will
You are good at writing btw
and you could be in speaking also
Just do it with fun
English is fun
😂
Yeah so just enjoy the process dont push yourself
Wooo
Dumbass
#💭|general to chat.
Hi guys, could someone explain to me the difference of He has retired and he is retired.
Retired - Past tense of To Retire
Retired - Adjective
similar meanings
"He has retired" is used when it's near-past
"He is retired" is a general statement
"He has retired from the job not long ago"
"He is retired for 2 decades now"
says nobody, ever
i just got a ping from someone that vanished suddenly

that was me
sooorry
i misunderstood what you were saying about the dictionary thing lol
I think it might be used in a formal context. Personally I would just use "look up" or "check"
yup
Your last example is wrong. It should be: He has been retired for 2 decades now.
Why did you put this here? What is your English question?
oops, wrong channel
Hi! What does "pity fight" mean and could you give an example of a situation where it happens between friends? Thank you!
Pity and Fight, both are different words ,as far as i know.
Ohh the way my friend described it, she said we would probably have small arguments in the future but those will be "pity fights" as she described
I see...
I think, i know, what she meant by dat.
Apparently its a "a fight against ur pity" but i still dont get how it works :'))
Ohh what do you think she mean?
What she actually said was, " there will be fights between you guys or maybe not in future, and for dat, both of you will feel, sad or regret bout it."
Awesome thank you so much, Sora for the explanation! ☺️
good catch means good thing you've noticed?
do americans often use staggering? or they prefer overwhelming instead?
they’re both fine to use
what’s the context?
i mean it's one of the meanings right?
i don’t know, i think it’d be better to say ‘good spot’
but i might be misunderstanding what you mean by to notice something
‘catch’ is more like when you get something, for example to catch a fish
like i've noticed something in video and told about this to my friend and he'd say "good catch"
hmm i don’t know
is your friend a native english speaker?
yes
i'm am native
Natives sometimes say it as a synonym of "Good job on noticing it" or something like that.
They use it when you notice something that they've missed or was hard to see
I'm native
I'm native too
hi, i have a question
idk if any of u could answer me
is the phrasal verb "fall out"(argue) used in the uk or in america?
sorry english is not my first language
i hear phrases like "we've fallen out of touch" or "fallen out of love" a lot, but just "fall out" i guess isn't used as much? not sure
oh ty, i've seen that too
the thing is, i just saw a video of a native man saying that it can be used to say that u argue with someone
he put the example of "i fell out with my gf"
and the guy is british so idk if that phrasal verb is used there in the uk or in america
falling out can mean souring a relationship. for example two guys were friends but then they had a falling out over money and now they dont talk
this is also used in the US
yes that's more or less used
but what about "two guys were friends but fell out over money"
ohhh thx
that usage i haven't really seen at all
this sounds odd to my but I don't know why. "fall out" in the present tense is used occasionally but i've never seen "fell out." "have/had a falling out" is much more common
no reason really this is just one of those weird things
ohh
so u think it's wrong to say "me and my friend fell out yesterday"?
like an example
i've said the phrase enough times in my head to the point where I'm not sure anymore lol. but I think that example would be incorrect not sure?
ooh ok
"had fallen out" works too i think
eh i'm googling it and allegedly you can say "fell out." maybe it's different in my dialect
really I wouldn't worry about it either way
¿Listo para más inglés? 🙌🏻 Aprende todo con los verbos compuesto visitando el link... Corre 🏃🏼♂️🏃🏼♀️ porque la clase ya empezó 👆🏻 https://bit.ly/3z9yzup #openenglishclasesenvivo
#OpenEnglish #Inglés #InglésOnline #AprendeInglés #InglésVirtual #InglésParaTodos #AprendeFácilYRápido #CursoDeInglés #AprenderInglés #CómoHablarInglés #InglésPrinc...
lol very thick british accent while speaking spanish
in min 15:14 he gives the example of "me and my gf fell out yesterday"
ik right
my friend, not my gf my bad
honestly i totally buy that "fell out" is correct. i suppose it's just strange to me because of my dialect
theres the picture where it says that
yeah the gf part maybe through me off. you wouldn't use this phrase for a romantic relationship. you would say "broke up"
ohh ok
i thought the same but he said it's more of an "argument" than a break up
like, he says it's not actually ending a relationship
are u british or american?
for me falling out generally implies breaking contact, no longer having a relationship that was previously there. but i'm american so I have no idea whether this guy is correct about british english, you would need to wait for a brit
i suspect that this phrase is just generally used more in the UK and its meaning is expanded. it has a pretty narrow definition in the US, but it seems to mean a variety of things in the UK
my first thought was that maybe it's a british idiom or something
exactlyy
yeah i guess in the US there are alternate phrases that capture some of the meaning. "beef with" for example i dont think exists in the UK
i'll keep that in mind
ig i'll just wait for a british person to answer my question
mmm beef
I've heard it in Europe and in the USA.
"We had a falling out."
"They fell out."
ohh tyy
What does boofheads mean?
Thank you very much. I appreciate it!
Thank you as well!
It sounds wrong to me. Maybe it's possible to say in a casual situation. People can say a lot of grammatically incorrect things with their friends. If you say: Me and my friends fell out yesterday, I'm waiting for the object. Fell out of what? A car? Are you ok? that's how I would respond to someone who said that.
Is there any difference to between "c'mon" and "come on"?
The first is just a shortened form of the second
a contraction, like do not => don't or was not => wasn't
I think what is interesting with come on vs. c'mon is that they sound almost identical
when spoken out loud
quickly
Hi, how do we say when two people are offended by each other. I mean, for example we're talking to someone and telling him/her that our parents had argument and they don't speak to each other. How do we say that to our friend?
Or for example I and my GF had an arguement, is that okay if I say ''We are not talking to each other, Jake. She wasn't nice to me and I think this way is better for me.''
And last question, what is the correct way to write ''all right'', I made some research on Google but I'm wondering what those who speak English natively think.
help
passer-by
what is おはよう or おはようございます in english? translate wont tell me
(ohayo or ohayou gozaimasu)
by=-passer
Can anyone here please suggest me what would be the right wording to say, "this topic/subject turned me on intellectually"?
I feel like using "turned on" is kind of weird to use in a decent document so I wanna replace it but couldn't find any suitable replacement.
maybe you could say "this piqued my intellectual interest"? (it might sound a bit odd though)
please could someone help @/rodrii
which is grammatically correct:
- Made in USA
- Made in the US
Both
merriam-webster is saying --> speed: : to increase the speed of : ACCELERATE , also speed up has the same meaning but I'm not sure. Speed up is more common among native speakers I guess
When talking about countries that are made of multiple names (for example USA (United States of America) or UK (United Kingdom) it is grammatically correct to use the article. For the most of singular-named countries, we would not use any article. There are a few exceptions from that rule (for example we would say "the Vatican (city)", not just "Vatican (city)"
Speed up is more common, accelerate is mostly used in formal language.
me too
"good morning"
its kinda funny
people sometimes ask me "What's hello in Japanese" and i never know what to answer
neither ohayo, konnitiwa nor konbanwa are quite like the regular english "hello"
''just ask it'' or ''just ask for it''
"the" is not a preposition; it's an article
Oh, right.
1.=informal, i've seen it on clothing labels. I guess, some Americans might speak that way. 2=more standard. In my opinion, you would need to write it this way on a test. The word "the" is said very quickly, so learners might miss it when people are talking.
the word "in" is a preposition in the two examples: 1. Made in USA 2) Made in the US. I agree with what you wrote, but please remove the word "preposition" from your answer. Only the word "preposition" is incorrect, so it could be misleading to a learner. If you removed the preposition/in , you would be left with the phrase "Made U.SA" which is incorrect.
maybe this is obvious for you: hi=informal greeting. hello=standard; Good Day=more formal. Are there equivalents in Japanese? I think those Japanese-language examples that you wrote are different ways to greet someone depending on the time of day. As you probably know: Good Morning, Good Afternoon and Good Evening are formal greetings for the different times of the day. Maybe in Japanese, they tend to use the formal way as standard.
yea that's the thing, their greetings are just so formal
i usually say "you could say konnitiwa which just means good day" but then they ask "what if i just wanted to say "Hi""
I'm not sure if there is a question in there...but I will pretend there is. I would say: Even though "good day" is considered to be a little formal in English, konnitiwa is the Japanese way to be informal/casual/friendly. (Would you agree?)
what he got bars means
if it's said about a rapper then it means his verses are good
The latter is. You will find "Made in America" on labels, but not "Made in USA".
This is because "the USA" is a reference to the entire country.
To be more general, "the" is usually said before acronyms anyway.
To be more specific toward the USA, it used to be "These United States", but it fell out of favour (mostly due to the war) and now it refers to the entire country as a singular entity.
"This interests me."
"I'm interested in this topic."
"Good Morning" (normal)
"Good Morning" (polite)
It will depend on one's personal preference, however "good morning" is normally reserved either for formal situations or one's partner/children.
It will depend on the context.
"Alright", generally, can be a confirmation of something or a way of saying something is of passable quality.
"All right" is generally a way of asking how things will be. It's a little strange to explain due to how specific the contexts are and how most use them interchangeably anyway.
"Speed" means speed. It isn't modifying anything. If you use it as a stand-alone verb, it makes most think you reference "speeding", as in driving faster than a speed limit.
"Speeding up" means that something is going faster. Literally, "the speed is going up".
Did anyone read the bite of the mango ?
no
"Whether you lease, finance, or own your car, it is mandatory to have car insurance" what does that mean in simple words
it means you have to pay for car insurance no matter which way your car belongs to you
whats lease and finace
lease is sorta like finance
you just pay for the car in small parts
like a bank loan
whats finance
means you get the car now but pay for it in small parts over many months
while leasing is like renting a car
but for companies
if you rent a car for a month, then you take the car from its owner for a month, and pay them a months worth of money, then return it
thank u
Hello. Could anyone help me to understand the following sentence? "We have time to make 20 cakes or 10 pizza" Does it mean we have time to make either 20 cakes or 10 pizza? Or does it mean we have time to make at most 20 cakes and 10 pizza?
Whats Conviction, misrepresent, unironically in simple simple words with simple examples
misrepresent is like saying someone is something they are not conviction is like being sentenced to something
It says 'or' in the sentence, so you only have time to make one of these two:
a) 20 cakes
b) 10 pizza
"arguments made our friendship drifted apart". is this grammatically correct?
"Or" means that it is one of the two, not both.
These are different terms entirely.
Conviction means that one has a firm belief, or one is firmly declared guilty of a crime.
Misrepresent means that someone is not represented correctly. Literally: "Mis", "not" + "represent".
"Unironically" is a somewhat a slang term. It means that someone means something sincerely.
They are very broad "races". They're not ethnicities.
An ethnicity is the combination of a culture and a group that lives said culture. The participants' origins or appearances aren't really taken into account.
"Arguments made our friendship drift apart". Is the correct version but your sentence was very close!
What do u mean by "very close"
It was almost completely correct.
Arguments made our friendship drifted apart
This is the corrected version
Thanks
You are welcome
What is the difference between: We all have had the same teammates and We all had the same teammates. Have had confuses me a bit.
i think i'd use "we have all had the same teammates" myself tbh
the difference between these lies in the context
you might say the first phrase when for example doing a comedic bit and trying to make a joke about teamwork
"we have all had the same teammates, you know, those guys who don't do anything and leave all the work to you"
something like that
while the second phrase is a more direct past-tense phrase that indicates that at some point in the past we were doing something and all had the same teammates
Thanks alot
Which is correct?
these kind of things
this kind of things
Ohhh I just need help
''I should like it back.'' --- I have seen this structure many times but I don't know why they use ''should''. Instead I would say, ''I will be happy if I can get it back.'' Anyways, how can we use that rule? Does ''should'' have a meaning other than the meaning similar to ''have to''?
"I have a book." --- why do we use 'a' in this sentence?
And can someone say, "I have book"?
No you can't say ''I have book.'' You can say ''I have a book'' or ''I have books'' or ''I have one book/two books/etc.''
Somebody will give you the best answer soon, but here is mine: for the reason I do not know, we specify the quantity of objects in English. A book, some milk, a piece of cheese etc.
Thanks.
"let me clarify it. your friend recived a flag due to a fraud item in steam he has no idea bout?"
can you say if this is correct
I would personally say: "Let me me clarify" or "Let me clarify this"
And for the second part i would say: "Your friend has received a flag due to a fraudulent item in steam which he has no idea about?"
Whats quantity in simple words
Amount, number
In a sentence?
quantity of things = amount of things = number of things
Oh yea
Am i the middle child cuz i have a twin and shes older than me
you'd be the younger child
although only technically
because younger by a few minutes really doesnt matter to anyone
and in some cultures the date of "birth" is actually the date of conceiving, not actual childbirth, in that case you'd be exactly the same age anyway
Hello!
guys, first time here.
I just got a feedback about a paragraph (7 lines) that I wrote in English for a job selection test (real chance, I am in 1st place atm) and the only thing they say is "there's a spelling mistake in line X" or "there's a Morphosyntax/Punctuation mistake in line Y". I've tried pasting the text in word but it doesn't show any mistakes and I can't seem to find any of the 3 mistakes they accused me of. I really want to make a good appeal against them (the appeal is also part of the selection tests). Can anyone take a look and give your opinion?
The three sections with pointed mistakes:
(1) ...criteria of “urgency” which is related to timely aspects that should.. – Morphosyntax/Punctuation mistake.
(2) ...to solve this” or “how long can this be left unchecked”. Last there is the “tendency”... – Spelling
(3) ...criteria that strives to describe the possible scenario... – Morphosyntax/Punctuation mistake.
Any possible argument to these 3 accusations of English mistakes?
For some context, this is the text. The mistakes are all in the second paragraph.
The GUT matrix is a risk management tool designed to evaluate the gravity, urgency and tendency of detected and potential problems, processes and its risks, thus allowing the manager to take the best course of action according to the entity’s policies.
Regarding the already mentioned criteria (gravity, urgency and tendency) of the GUT matrix, it’s essential to explain each one of them. “Gravity” is related to the degree of the impact that can be caused by the object of the investigation. Following, there is the (1) criteria of “urgency” which is related to timely aspects that should raise questions like: “how quickly should this be addressed” or “how long do we have (2) to solve this” or “how long can this be left unchecked”. Last there is the “tendency” (3) criteria that strives to describe the possible scenario that can happen if the situation or problem is left unchecked.
Taking these three criteria in consideration, a proper evaluation can be done and the manager can decide to accept, mitigate, transfer or avoid the related risks, thus choosing the action that is most adequate to the stablished risk tolerance and followed policies.
are those really the spots the mistakes occurred at
if they say "there is a mistake in line X" what do they refer to with "line"
how much text
without knowing more, i can say that i believe you need to put commas around the "which is related to timely aspects" part but that's about it
i'm not sure if the "which" phrase is just "which is related to timely aspects" of if it's the whole "which is related to timely aspects that should raise questions..." one
i think what they think is correct is that the which phrase is just "which is related to timely aspects", and the rest of the sentence is about the criteria of urgency
in that case "which is related to timely aspects" is a nonrestrictive phrase that should be used with commas
i would also personally put a "for" in the "how long can this be left unchecked" part but they didn't mention that so idk what's wrong there
i would also use "lastly" instead of "last", but that's not a mistake. What is a mistake IMO is not putting a comma after the linking word, whichever you end up choosing
but again apparently that part has no mistakes that they found
i have no clue where a spelling mistake could be in line 12 but it's all in cursive so honestly they could misread any part of it
i agree with the line 10 mistake at least
line 13 i honestly don't see anything wrong
the only two places you could put any punctuation in line 13 are before the two "that" words
but you don't need anything there
so idk
Someone told me that could be because the singular of criteria is criterion. I would never guess that, lol.
Yeah, I'm almost sure that when you use the wrong verb tense, or plural when it should be singular, it falls into the morphosyntax aspect.
well then good luck finding a spelling error
i can barely read all that cursive not to mention try to spell check it
hahaha, it's 5 straight hours for 70 questions and 2 essays. We end up rushing it, but my letter was still among the most readable ones.
i fail to understand how does that make for a job interview
It's not really a job interview, it's a state selection test for auditors. There's still an oral test.
- criterion. 2. these (I think you are referring back to the word "questions") 3.
strive(I would call this a subject-verb agreement mistake. oops. criterion not criteria [tendency=it=criterion] **good luck with the job. Amazing writing! Seriously. Your only appeal is that most native speakers make the criteria/criterion mistake. I tend to always use the word criteria even when I'm talking about the singular.
It's British English. I just heard that kind of structure again on Netflix. I would say: I would like it back. [I will be happy...=incorrect. I would be happy If I could get it back=correct]
1.=casual English, don't write it if it's for school, job, etc. These kinds of things=grammatically correct 2. =incorrect (This kind of thing=correct)
Thank you!!!
Thank you.
It is him whom i know.
It is he whom i know.
It is he who i know.
Which is correct?
First one is correct
Why?
Can you tell me the reason?
Because it says him as his gender next to whom but you need to add word that to I know
an object comes after "it is" and 'him' is the male object pronoun. "whom" corresponds to "him"
Thank you all.
You're welcome
Anyways do Present Perfect and Past Perfect grammars used often in the exams?
I'm a teacher so...
Help me i'm noob.
Choose the correct option to complete the sentence.
She had an idea and ___ her friend.
(did calling to / didn't called / was calling / called)
Thx for help 🙂
Id choose called if she did call them but if she didnt i would say didn't call
Was calling is much better choice
Miku's choice is the best option
Which pronoun comes after to be verb? Subjective pronoun or Objective pronoun
Hot dang I'm really good teacher
is it whose or who's
It is definitely 'called'.
'Was calling' is incorrect because that wouldn't work with 'and'. You'd need to replace it with 'while/when' instead
'Didn't called' and 'did calling to' are grammatically incorrect, so not those.
Grammar articles suggest you use a subjective pronoun after 'to be', or any other linking verb.
This is because the verb is renaming the subject, so the pronoun has to be subjective as well.
Look up 'subjective pronouns after linking verb' for source. I'm not on my personal laptop right now.
That said, you'd still see many people use objective pronouns after the verb. I think that's considered acceptable only in spoken/informal English
I'd just call it six hundred thirty six. Anything shorter would sound unnatural
Yup
Six thirty six
deadass is serious?
Deadass means serious
Ill pit it in a sentence: "I saw a car flying"said Jane "Deadass?" said John "Yeah i saw a flying car, deadass".
I read this in a book "it yields results of a fashion" ,, what of a fashion means?
Please can i have context
In this context, it has the same meaning as 'in a way; somehow"
"Deathbed" is where one lays to die.
"These kinds of things."
Plural to plural. "This" is always singular.
Articles specify number. "A" means "one".
"I have a book."
"I have one book."
- You may want to remove the quotation marks or add a comma prior to "like".
- Do not use "or" for lists. Use commas instead.
- Criterion, not "criteria", combined with quotations. If you reference one category, the term is "criterion"; "criteria" is for multiple categories.
It's strange that they simply write "morphosyntax" as the error. It is like referencing a grammar error as "writing problem". Wow, truly?
Hello Can I ask question about how I did on my IELTS practice test? I just want to know if I did good or bad..
Hey can anyone help me with my english assignment about "Appreciating Work". I need to find a text example about Appreciating work in a formal text and informal.
I can help if you would like
yes please, i would appreciate it
What does respect the grind mean
Respect the grind means respect the hard work
ok
ok thz
She had an idea SO she called her friend. ALL of the other choices are wrong. (I can't really understand why your example sentence has "and". The only possible reason that I can think of at the moment is that it is casual English. That's the only time I would use "and" in this type of sentence.)
What I want to know is why do you need to know? No one speaks like this and most people would just say or write: I know him. I think the 2nd one is correct. Why? old grammar. When you answer the phone, the formal way of answering is "This is she/he/Bob." =Subject +be verb+ complement/subject pronoun.
Both. Who's that? That is Bob. Whose bag is that? That is Bob's bag.
@flat rune, invites are not allowed!
I want to ask something if anyone can help me with. I have been in this server for almost a year but I never took the first step yet in learning what I joined for.
I felt the server is overwhelming and I don't know what I should be focusing on.
I want to improve my English speaking for my career in software development.
I don't know what should I focus on, is it the voice channels or something else along with it.
I would appreciate if someone could be my guider through the server and how to make the best out of it.
we can't tell you what you need
if you want to improve speaking skills then speak more
if you want to improve something else focus on that
we can't tell you what you need to focus on as we don't know what exactly you need
for software development i imagine you would want to improve your vocabulary around technology and programming lingo
i don't think this server has any rooms that are that niche
There are some people with that niche though
you can definitely find people who are into that and learn from them yeah
but it's not something we can do for you
You could tell me what channels do I need to check to improve my speaking
that what I meant
You can ask things that you dont understand in this channel
we have chat rooms for general chatter to improve social skills, voice rooms to improve speech and this room for questions
proofreading for checking your texts
judge my accent for checking your speech
to be completely honest i don't really see the value of the voice rooms in this server because they're usually devoid of many native speakers to learn from
but they help me with understanding different accents of the world as they're full of people from all over
I noticed that but I thought there will be like events or something
but i don't think there is a very high chance for you to enter a voice chat and stumble upon some programming talk or something
to get the native speakers for the voice channels
well they do have events
natives hold some teaching sessions
i don't really like those either as there are too many people for individual improvement to be very pronounced
I cant do voice calls but i can help you if you would like
and it's also somewhat manageable to find a native to speak with you, but finding a native to speak with you about software development is probably gonna be pretty tough
I would appreciate that a lot.
Dm's?
Any topic would be fine just to improve the speaking in general
Sure.
the adjacent Bluebonnet Classroom server has weekly sessions with natives
and there's only like 4 people in those voicechats so it's a lot easier to actually get feedback and back-n-forth talk with natives
if thats what you want
but the sessions are like 30 minutes long so it's not nearly enough
so far i was not able to find a place for daily speaking practice with natives
Do you recommend any other sources? other from the server itself?
apart from the obvious stuff like Omegle or something
i didn't really search much anyway
just googled "discord servers for learning english" and entered all of them
Did it help you by any kind?
not by much
this server is the best by far though
i mostly just check this room an the proofreading room, don't really ask my own questions as i rarely have any, but just seeing what other people are trying to learn and learing alongside them from natives answering questions is quite helpful
however when it comes to speaking practice i'm still exactly where i started
which is fine by me, english is just a hobby for me, unlike people who need it for their job. If i was more serious about it i'd definitely invest more effort into it
But i feel like just self-teaching english by taking online courses, reading english books and watching english shows can help you a lot more
covers most of the bases apart from actually speaking to people which has therefore become my worst skill
Same here, I read a lot from programming articles that all in english so I learned to read more faster and watching courses for programming as well made me understand whoever speaking english without needing subtitles
But I'm bad in grammar still xD
That how I learned englush
i learned all of my grammar from reading
dont need anything else
but exercises exist
can find lots of grammar courses online
i would not recommend learning grammar from this server though
way too inefficient
you could've found out your answer and moved on hours ago if you just googled it and you're still waiting for an answer from a native in this chat room
why bother
i reserve this room only for questions that google can't answer
and most grammar is easy to just look up
I thought I would find efficient way to improve speaking here.
That what I came up with from googling, joining English discord servers for voice chat but as you said, native people rarely go into those channels
can probably get some of them to talk to you directly if you ask around
just dont expect them to randomly appear i guess
I want to say smth i'm new here in this server i just entered rn , the most things that helped me recently while watching movies without any translation to my mother language is songs , reading and now i added podcasts plus youtube channel it was rlly helpful and it rly helped me alot which is linguamarina. I want ask if u have any idea about website that translate the words in simple way from english to english ?
a dictionary is what you need i guess
translating words from english to simple english
I already have one (oxford mini dictionary )
an online dictionary of course
if you dont understand a word google it and most likely you'll get a simple explanation
But some meanings it seems a little bit hard for me or i don't get it that much
Like i got a new words today which was context and discourse
Preched
One more thing i just got hired in a english acc that spotted in north america , alright, so how can i get improved faster ? So , i would stay more in the company wht i mean , everyday i take 1hr and a half maybe for english only to study new things or learn new things wht else would suggest for me to get improved more and more
Whats a program in university in simple simple words
you can just say college program
i feel like just doing this is good enough
Thats seems better
Whats college program
In simple words
Whats a program
I . Dont understand
I'd like to ask if there's a word in English, which is responsible for a part of human that judges their's actions rightiousness.
A feeling of moral responsibility.
conscience
Hello
Let me ask the meaning of "wash around" from the sentences below / I try to find in dictionary but I can not.
Even if the cup is not insulated, the heating will be inefficient because the flame will wash around the sides. You're better using a saucepan or similar container with a wider base. The steel will overheat and get the oxidized coating in an insulated cup because it is not cooled by water.
I think it means the flame (from the oven/cooking place) will spread around the sides of the cup.
ok Thank you:)
When to use does in a question form
- John was publishing comics until 15th of May.
- John had been publishing comics until 15th of May.
Which is correct?
Does - He, She, It (Present simple)
Does he go to the store everyday?
Does she like to read?
How long does it take to get to England from German?
Thank you so much bro
But What's the difference
Between
Is that was a six
Or does that was a six
I m very confused literally 😔
both
Could someone explain this sentence, please? I didn't understand especially "...out of single university colleges..."
"Other universities developed during the 19th century out of single university colleges in provincial cities."
which is proper - all year round or all year around? or is it the same?
It means how universities developed from single university colleges.
they are the same - all year around sounds more formal
They are both correct, and they mean the same thing. ('had been' hints a BIT that John might still be publishing comics, it's just that he's doing something slightly different now)
Could someone help please
(trying to see the difference between 'is that was a six' and 'does that was a six')
@crimson narwhal "it's always the late ones that get/gets the smallest"
Neither of those sentences are correct. You're mixing two completely different tenses (present simple and past simple), as you are using does and is with was in a single sentence. This only appears in cases of more advanced syntax, so in this simple example it is incorrect. The correct form of this question would be "Was it a six?" if you were talking about the past and "Is it a six" if you are talking about the presence.
It's always the late ones that get the smallest.
The subject is ones
So you have to use the word get like you would use for a plural.
tnx!
In informal English, both would be acceptable. However, the word until often goes with past perfect tense. Let's say that 15th of May was a point in the past. That means, that the action of him publishing his comics happened in the past, before the point in the past that we are referring to. You assumed correctly, that we would need a continuous tense, as John released a new comic once in a while, before 15th of May. That's why, the grammatically correct sentence would be "John had been publishing comics until 15th of May".
Some verbs need "do/does" to make a question. Example: have. I have a computer. Does he have a computer? (Does+third person singular+base verb) The negative form also needs do/does: She doesn't have a computer. Be verb is special; it does not use "do/does" to make a question. I am a teacher. Are you a teacher? Is he a teacher?
@crimson narwhal @minor galleon @floral reef Thank you very much 
- That sentence looks wrong OR: It sounds like someone wrote the word "was" but actually it looks like a number "6". 2. =incorrect. Don't use "does" with a be verb.
no problem
Imagine one day we wake up to a world with no paper.
In this sentence, is it correct to write “wake up to” or should it be “wake up in”?
I think both are fine, but "wake up in" sounds better
and it should be "woke", since this is a hypothetical situation that wouldn't happen at all
at the time being*
Oh! :0 I see. Thank you very much! ^^
what does it mean "imma"
slang for "I'm gonna", which is also slang for "I'm going to"
thanks
Thank you so much brothers
@minor galleon @kind ivy @crimson narwhal
It would be best if you spoke or wrote with others casually. With the level you are at now, one will only truly improve with conversation.
Without the "the" article before the date, both are incorrect. Both are correct grammatically. Their use depends on the context of the sentence.
What does mandates mean in simple words?
"It must be done."
Thz
Wait whag about in a sentence
U must complete ur mandates n duties
Thx
yw
Hello
Can I ask you guys a thing?
Do u know any English word for " a cupboard that is used to keep dishes, utensils"?
why the heck mannerisms are always plural?
what does "consequence" mean?
it means you have to face something terrible or whtvr
Have means
To possess
So how in ,
Let's have Lunch
Means to eat food
ex: u and ur friend had a deal and that deal was "to cream in the cinema, but if u didn't do that u have to drink vinegar"
@flat rune what does all of the sudden means
i understand
@flat rune "if u didn't do the dare" or "if u don't do the dare" u have to do 10 pushups
"All of a sudden" means that something happened within an instant and without forewarning.
It depends on the context. The first is for when you reference the past, the second is for when you reference the terms and conditions in the present.
"Have" does not mean only "to possess". It can also refer to making an event happen or experiencing it.
What is the difference between "nor" and "neither"?
i have a question, is it correct to say "he is very hard working"? and is it "he is a hard worker" also correct?
Hello! I have one question for writing sth really important
winning and succeeding in placing second for His Excellency the Mayor of the Eastern Province's award for enterprise resource planning in data technology management
does this sentence sound correct ?
I need a pro help on this
thank you in advance
im not sure what you are trying to say but that is not a complete sentence
I want to state that the administrative department has won the 2nd prize sponsored by the mayor of the eastern province among the other administrative departments in data technology Nd enterprise resources planing
Somehow I want to create an attractive sentence for my CV
I'm just having difficulty to do that
Squeezing my brain to do it
Most of the time we use both of them in same sentence
These both use in such manner that you don't like any option
For instance
Neither i like chocolate flavour nor of strawberry
(To understand this better)
I hope in your mother tongue also there will be such pair of words
Where you wants to express i don't like any of these option
He is a very hardworking person and he is a hard worker
Both r correct sentence
I will never suggest anyone to use Google translator
But in these case that will be helpful
Put that sentence there and translate it in your language
That will be helpful
InshAllah
tysm!
In spanish we have something similar, thanks, now I understand it better
Nor is kinda like the negative version of or, and neither is like the negative version of either.
Thats how i would put it
can anyone tell me if "get it together" is the same as "get your act together"?
pretty much the same but go on is a bit rude
Example: you can continue sir.
Go on then what's taking so long.
it's only rude if you use it in a rude way
for example in this scenario there would be no rude context: "Getting donations allowed him to go on/continue travelling"
hey guys! quick question is it
“it will take me 3 seatings to finish a bowl of salad” or “it will take me 3 sittings to finish a bowl of salad” ?
i see.. thank you
What’s convenience in simple words
Why we dont use "than"with "outweigh" and can someone help me in knowing the word
comfortable
What is the word that sounds good? Is it "may", "can" or "will" on the sentence "how __ i help you?" Or is it based on the situation
you would pretty much never use "will" there, but "can" and "may" are both acceptable. The difference between them is that "may" sounds even more polite and subservient
tbh you could forget that last part and just think that "can" and "may" are completely interchangeable with no noticeable difference in this context
"outweigh" already means "weigh more than", that's why you don't use "than" again because it's already implied in the word itself
thankyouu❤︎
Did i make the correct sentence?
eg: your dignity outweigh your regrets.
no, that's not correct
tbh i'm not sure what is that even supposed to mean
but if it holds some meaning for your context you'd still use "outweighs"
Like your dignity is more important or significant than your regrets
So how it would be use in terms of outweigh
i would not use outweigh at all in that sentence
but if you want to, at least write "your dignity outweighs your regrets"
Ohhh it means its not giving the context here
Like google always answer me
Benefits outweigh the risk
i am just unable to comprehend it in different contexts
Thank you..
hallo does anyone know if its sitting or seating
sitting
guys: If I was you.../If I were you...?
were
thx
Yes.
"How may I help you" is the common business phrase.
could anyone pls tell me :(( srry if i bother u
thank u!!
Ur welcome
can anyone check my paragraph please? I am preparing a cv. the paragraph is that:
I am a Game Developer who has proven himself with various projects, worked with and led teams, ambitious, determined and excited, very passionate about programming, games and game making, and has been working in Unity for 3 years.
i would add an "is" before "ambitious" and "very passionate"
isn't it like "I is very passionate"
sory if i am wrong :)
i used google translate and it was putting "is" too
I am a Game Developer who has proven himself with various projects, worked with and led different teams. I am very ambitious, determined, excited and very passionate about programming, games and game making, and also I've been working in Unity for 3 years.
I made a few changes see it. If u think it's okay u can use this
thank you so much :)
It's alright
where are you from btw?
Well "may" feels more polite "can" is used in a casual sense while will should not be used in this phrase cause it changes it's meaning
India
you no longer refer to "I", you now refer to "who"
so it would be "who is very passionate"
oh thanks
is the meaning of the word "ideology" the same as the meaning of an opinion?
they can mean something similar but ideology is a lot stronger
ideology is like a doctrine, something you live by
or you could say ideology is like a set of opinions that one abides
"enough time" or "time enough"?
such as?
in a general sense "enough time" is correct, but you could for example say "I've seen this time enough to know it's not going to be the new world record" if you see say a marathon runner get a particular time at some spot in his run
oh thx
could also i suppose say something like "Is this time going to be enough to win" and shorten it to "is this time enough to win" and it'd still make sense
but those are very fringe cases
guys, is it "stick around" an idiom or a slang?
Type in one word to complete the sentence.
The train arrived an hour ... So, he must be home by now.
Because you correctly wrote "who has proven", that means your subject (who=a game developer=he/it/she). So, you need "IS very passionate" because you were talking about yourself in the third person. I hope that is clear. If not, let me know.
No capitals on "game developer." Example: I am a teacher.
early.
enough time is more standard. I have enough time to do it. Time enough sounds more formal, used in literature. But, I can't think of a real example. I googled it, but all the examples sounded forced. My go-to answer is that "time enough" must be British English. Hopefully, someone British can give some insight. I would like to know.
"That was exactly what I had never meant
Which you always believed that I was. "
Here should I use "was" or "did" ?
You need more context. Try to finish your sentence. ...you always believed that I was a hard-worker. OR ....you I always believed that I did the right thing.
To add to what the person above responded. Did you mean "...what I had never meant to DO or BE?
I was talking about the last word of the 2nd if it made any correct sense or not
hello can someone help me in dm plis?
THE short answer is the whole thing is wrong. BECAUSE you don't have a complete phrase. you HAVE to decide if you want to say "what i had never meant to DO OR BE. Choose one and then that is your answer.
Okay.... I got it
I wrote it as a line for my poem
So, you added the word "be", right? If you don't. It's wrong.
Suppose if we add To Say after meant
Then what should be the next step
then both was and did are wrong.
Which you always believed that I meant. Is one possibility. But i just noticed meant is said twice. so not very poetic.
Okay.. so would it be like if we'll add BE in first line then we'll have to add was in the last or if I'll add Do in the first then have to use Did in the last one?
Please rewrite it.
It's too hard to go up and down
Wait
"That was exactly what I had never meant
Which you always believed that I was. "
Here should I use "was" or "did" ?
You said both are incorrect
Okay.. so would it be like if we'll add BE in first line then we'll have to add was in the last or if I'll add Do in the first then have to use Did in the last one?
So said my lines were incomplete so I had to add something after "meant "
never meant to be.=grammatically correct (just add "TO be "to your first line.) BUT i'm not sure that is so poetic.
"That was exactly what I had never meant TO be
Which you always believed that I was. " (SORRY, i kept forgetting the "to".!!)
Yeah okay I agree with you thanks for the help I really appreciate you I know I troubled you in this but I just want to say that To Be actually becomes a different thought for me and when I wrote it I had another sense or thought in my mind
Because I don't have all the context. It's hard to know if it fits with the rest of your poem.
Can't we just add To Say instead of To Be
That was exactly what I had never meant
Which you always believed that I was
You pretended to know me better than the most
Your false claims my dear, pulled me out of the world lost.
This is what I had written
to say sounds nice. Which you always believed that IT was. How about that?
You pretended to know me better than ~~the ~~most
If it makes sense then it's absolutely fine to me 😅
That was exactly what I had never meant to say
Which you always believed that IT was
it's a really nice poem. 😊
But what is IT here ?
As I have used " I " in the first line as the subject
maybe it=that?
that=also seems to mean the misunderstanding= "what I had never meant to say"
I'm sorry 😔 I'm really a stupid person it's very difficult to write when English is your second language 🤦🏻♀️
Okay 100% correct thank you so so much
It's hard to explain things by writing. Mostly, it sounds right to me and now I am trying to explain it.
Yeah exactly
I don't know when i should use "do" (does) and "did"
do is present did is past
i do my homework (nowadays)
i did my homework (in the past)
could anyone tell me cuz i looked it up and some pages say it's a slang and some others say it's an idiom
Hi guys, could somebody explain me difference between present perfect continuous and present perfect. One source say that present perfect we use to say something which happened in past and present perfect continuous we use with something which happened in past and it's continuous to present and will be in the future. Something like that!
But why I can't say
I have waited for you for 3 hours
But:
I have been waiting for you for 3 hours
Maybe I'm seeing this guy now and I say this line "I have waited for you for 3 hours"
Now, I'm not already waiting for him.
And I have seen many examples when I couldn't understand why I can't use other tense.
I will be happy if somebody explain me this difference or differences
Have a nice day
hello, I have been studying English for several years
and i faced this problem 
I have a language barrier, I can speak fluent English alone, but in front of people I'm scared to do it and I start to stutter
how can i fix this?
Hello everyone, I noticed a problem that in Ruae( close reading) I struggle to understand the question and the meaning which makes me lose marks. What can I do or any tips to fix this?
Firstly, try to join small groups, even better if they are homies. Secondly, perhaps you get struggles by speaking because of timidity.
I saw it just now, thx
i have a question, is "you made that up" the same as "you made up that"? like, are they both sentences correct?
when alone, only the first one is correct. if the sentence is longer then you´re also able to use the second
for example
You made up that. incorrect
You made up that idea. correct
this is actually a very good question because I don't know why this is
ohh thank you!!
yup. sorry I don't know the explanation tho lol
