#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 1010 of 1
you have no fucking idea how polish education system works do you
Me in a normal conversation: ānobody even knows what a dog is anymore believe me, they used to call it a canineā
Or literally all Swedish speaking politicians in Finland because they are Swedish
Clearly not well enough if you're the best of what it produced
you could have googled it even lmao
Average Italian
My hatred comes from the consultancy class that plagues the center left. At least right wingers have THINGS to campaign on. Western liberal politicians are the most spineless pathetic people on Earth. I equate those that go for a political degree as those who retort a strict script when pressed by the opposition or media
Because of him I use "many such cases" a lot more often
Same lol
I say it and my friends are always confused
Yeah pretty much the consultancy class reigns supreme, itās a really disgusting thing which is why Iām trying to stay in a very specific lane away from electoralism
Mamdani is the western hemisphereās only major saving grace
Heās backed by a major consulting firm btw
Oh nvm my wifi was shitting itself
This why libs keep losing
Yes but heās distinctly separate from the consultant class
Where is the translate button
EVERYONE is a libs enemy
lmao
democrat shill class
Language barrier be damned
Heās distinctly separate
Heās just got a more slick consulting firm who knows how to make people appear working class
Or rather fighters for the working class
Next step will be having a government backdoor in Minecraft versions sold in EU
https://cyberinsider.com/eu-calls-vpns-a-loophole-that-needs-closing-in-age-verification-push/
Maybe Brexit was a good idea after all
Weāll be banning VPNs by next anyways itās pointless tbh
They have much worse systems in place already
The UK government giving vagueposts by saying āweāll be investigating the effects it hasā (leaving the option of banning it open)
EU framework is terribly neoliberal, major issue with brexit was a weird panic over sovereignty but wouldāve been good if they executed it with some coherent plan
Discordia about to die
A coherent plan wouldāve been CANZUK
The average support across all potential countries of a CANZUK union is like 75%
Whatever the UK has for age verification is worse than the EU and they already have it
Doesn't it include USA
They donāt actually care about āsovereigntyā they care about britishism
No
Well the anglopshere does but CANZUK doesnāt
USA is more anglo than NZ culturally
Ok my discord somehow half crashed
Discordia is now closed for maintenance
Probably more than Canada as well
CANZUK is the closest thing to a unified anglosphere
Itās not like the US is unifying anything
@sweet wolf Are you still here
Goodbye discordia
But still part of the anglosphere
The anglosphere is UK, Ireland, Canada, USA, Australia and NZ
How does it feel to share it with the Francosphere
Thatās the worst part of Canada
Servers are literally dying bro
Best*
I blame it on nobu
Thatād be British Columbia
Because it has British in the name?
If you close discordia it prolly won't open again
Because of the British now Canada is worse than France
Pacific Northwest
At least France has road signs with "stop" instead of "arrĆŖt"
Facts
Ontario #1 (I slept on an airport floor there because I got stuck during Covid)
Is it true that you guys already have age verification with the face recognition thing
Now I need to carry a pic of Captain Qwark with me all the times
#FuckMyPrivacy
My car has a camera that controls emergency braking and lane assist and stuff so it probably records me anyways
If one day you will be involved in a disastrous road accident the car will be able to describe your appearance to the doctors who are reconstructing your face
rip homie
next software update ur cooked
Thank god
I have 4 cameras in my car
Hi
Full 3d reconstruction
Discord is shitting itself, you facing it too?
Now you only need a probe to not leave out the interiors
It's fixed now bro, I called discord ceo
your personality will be saved in an .md file for LLMs and then you're back
bro you“re 16
Gifs aren't loading, for a minute it didn't show anyone's roles and I couldn't attach media
The fuck is up with these group chat discord servers
What's the fourth pfp on the call
Whimper
Legs
Iām a GROWN ADULT in 2 months thank you
I will be getting battered on the day
Why does it look like she self harmed
She did
Perhaps because she did
It's edgy bro lots of kids to weird stuff now
They donāt even do it cause theyāre depressed
You tell them you used to sniff glue and they look at you like YOU'RE the idiot
They do it cause theyāre fucked up
Itās TikTok Iām telling you
The difference between the people on Instagram and TikTok is STARK
TikTok comments are BRAIN DEAD
Tbh seems like things improved, when there were self harmers in my teens they weren't larpers
Insta taught me a lot of racism
Now I hardly hear about it
I had to delete my account tho my feed kept reverting to corn even though I just interacted with Bosnian real estate, Chinese memes and Turk propaganda
And unfortunately or fortunately the drinking and smoking culture is dying out
Genuinely saw a thread of fucking dipshits on TikTok arguing about there being a King of France and a King of Paris because this TikTok account is called Prince of Paris
Why are these people allowed to vote
The next Hitler will be someone addicted to social media
Put them on test, crash that car
Itāll be a groyper
Comment, 9013 likes
Why is he prince of only Paris and not the whole France?
Reply, 948 LIKES
Its just like medieval times (i asume) where the king of the whole country gave his most trusted people a piece of his land to manage as he couldnt do it himself. Now i think he isnt managing the city but hes just the prince
IDIOT!
what the helly
Call them again
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned Tehran against targeting US maritime assets Friday, saying the āred lineā is clear. #iran #trump #worldnews #politics #usa #israel
āThey threaten Americans, they are going to be blown up,ā he added, even as he sought to repair strained ties with Italy and the Vatican during a two-day visit fo...
āIf you threat Americans, you will be blown upā
This is the position of the United States of America
Mr Beast
idk abt business
Hop on bf6 bro we need a fourth šš
Mhm suuuuure buddyā¦. You realize that if you torch one of those oil ships itās like guaranteed setting your economy on fire right?
That threat is a paper tiger
Blow everything up and force them to compromise that you will never have to worry about it
Are you this stupid?
Seriously
Even you must realize the real reasons why the admin thinks they need this war
1
Israel told trump to do it
2
They want to control the flow of oil
Blowing up the straight destroys the whole reason for being there
Your own claim from the white house quite says the opposite
According to the white house, this is a military campaign aimed to achieve a regime change against Iran
To protect Americanās interest
Also.
This behavior from trump is impeachable. Hereās Senator Mark Kelly explaining his experience.
The same White House which constantly lies to the American public even which video footage literally proves them wrong.
They have proven themselves an untrustworthy source.
The white house is the supreme authority, representing the nation of the USA
No
It is not
Thatās not how it works.
Go reread the constitution and federal statues.
Your own claim is based on complete rejection against the claim by government of your own
Who has the power to declare war, break or create treaties and set policy.
Hint. It is not the White House.
Thatās the congress, but the president represent the state
No.
He represents, The Executive
Not, āthe stateā
Heās the symbolic person of the state
The state is a three pronged breast. One bearing three heads
The president, you know what president means
He enforces policy, he does not create it.
It means no other individualās power is above him, in your country
Incorrect
He could create executive order to implement some policy made by himself
With extreme limitations
And only under temporary conditions
Watch the video, it explains how trump violated the constitution which by law renders him unfit to serve.
and he can launch a military campaign out of the USA by his presidential power
No
He can only deploy for 30 days
without approval of the congress
30 days is actually after this war has been started
The fact that he and his admin keep calling it a war opens them up to criminal prosecution
also this fuel crisis isn't only affecting America, it is affecting more to other countries, and you could use it as a leverage to gain some significant interest
is it working now
bingo, the fear to be intimidated of an ongoing energy cut off is in effect, typical classic realism
yes, nice
it is not a war, yet
You have a very liberal and retarded interpretation of āinterestā
national interest, to be specifically
The national interest is solving the cost crisis.
The national interest is decreasing the housing crisis
not quite, the national interest is actually achieve self-independence
The national interest is securing our country against another viral outbreak
Interest is not whipping your dick out and seeing that itās bigger than the other guyās
Itās whatās in the interest of the people.
that's people's interest, not national interest
Hey. Dipshit. What kind of government is America
Democracy.
Run by and for the people.
The peopleās interest IS the nationās interest.
there is the social class in America, and people is divided in several classes
your people's interest only represent poor people and some middle class of people
that is a contradiction to the interest of the rich and the billionaires
that is only considered, the interest of the poor
not the general concept of people
the people who made the policy, who implement the policy, are all rich guys supported by billionaires
they represent the country, they are the guy who were in charge
šššššš
even if you are a constitutional republic
Good one bro
I'm demonstrating a fair point
and that is true
I dunno why I even bother gracing this dipshit with a reply when he clearly has no fucking idea what heās talking about.
Insult him in Chinese
yeah i was wondering when you'll figure out he has a humiliation kink or something
Yeah
Probably
Why the closer I get to the 256th galaxy the more political the names get
i just saw a young priest on facebook saying that lgbt is not people, its a harmfull ideology trying to depopulate earth and enslave people, because "its easier to rule over dumb and small society"
its easier to rule over dumb, uneducated people huh, don't you say lmao
Coming from a priest ššš
Besides the "not people", he's not wrong
i asked if he shouldnt be kinda forced to respect every god's child on earth, love your neighbour and all
"respect people sure, but not a devilish ideology that came from hell leads to hell and despises god, its in catholics nature to eradicate the natural corruption"
lmao what
fuck your neighbour i guess
Do gay atheists not understand that the LGBT community is in fact an ideology
Is it that complicated
you do understand that ideology aint a bad thing on its own right
anti-communism is also an ideology
do you like love comminism or something, i dont think so
remember that its only kinda fine on paper
It's not, I agree, but he's free to choose if he supports it or not based on his own values
You can't force people to accept your ideology
What's next? We normalise nazism?
sure, he's not free to just spit random bullshit to make a group of people look worse
idk how it is hard to understand for you the fact that your country is controlled by capitalists
Cope harder man
Based on his own values and morals they are worse, and it's not "bullshit" just because you disagree with it, that's no different than people saying that several genders don't exist
it is the definition of bullshit since he lied numerous times also in comments when i asked more questions, also as a christian PRIEST he is NOT allowed to do that even to nazis
personally, i think catholics should be able to say whatever they want about this kind of people-like creatures tho
What's the lie though
it is not a cope, it is a FACT
the fact is, you can't find a street broke ass in the congress
Hes not wrong, the us is run by oligarch billionaires wtf kinda take is that its run by the people
According to a Catholic gays would/should be:
- Deranged
- Corrupt
- Evil
None of those are lies from his POV
you seriously think that everyone is just gonna convert to being gay and will reach the goal of depopulation
are you saying that with enough amount of gay corn you could suck men?
And solving inflation, the chinese dude isnt wrong, thats largely a genz / young peoples thing
Old people want other shit hence why nothing ever changes
That's as plausible as someone claiming they were born gay, that scenario is entirely possible and plausible if you subscribe to Catholic values
you fr right now man?
The catholic church supports lgbtq marriage
and the pope said slay
this is amazing
You both have the same argument:
You: If we normalise the LGBT then more gays will be comfortable with coming out
Him: If we let the corrupt LGBT spread then more gays will spawn
It shouldn't
that was not what he said and i think you might be bi
have you ever considered that maybe
But the pope does and he can change the script so
unfortunately the popeās word means yall mfs gotta bow down and accept it
Karrin is unable to form a coherent thought without including a personal remark
im just making simple observations
I'm not religious. I said that it shouldn't have done that because you shouldn't cater to something you disagree with
This is why I think that Catholics are cowards
But there are other denominations of Christianity outside of the catholic church that dont
also even sodoma and gomora was about r@pe, not homosexuality. And technically, bible only says anything about gay men, so lesbians are completly fine
Because the Pope ordained something?
Which is genuinely disputable based on the scripture
which is hard to decipher since its 500000 years old
Times are aā changinā baby
Are you gay
Not only that but also for "Changing with the times" and modernising/alternating their values to cater to modern takes, like LGBT and abortion
No
So what
Religions can change, who says they should stay in the stone age
Back in the day kings would change the religion to whatever they wanted
Sola Scriptura says that
now its a bad thing apparently cause its too new
Not anymore
What makes it a good thing?
bible doesnt say anything about abortions tho, its referenced once when bible describes a priest making some kind of water supposed to "make her womb swell"
Itās progressive
and gives to a woman ofc
progressivism is fundamentally good
soooo there is a tutorial
It says one thing about lesbians but it's up to interpretation
what fragment, i didnt saw that i think
Anyways guys im really hyped about the new virus
Hopefully we get a covid19 esque job market again
An ideology being "progressive" (For you) does not make it inherently good (Unless it's just for you)
true, lets go back to bronze age
Somewhere in Romans it condemns "relationships against nature" but it doesn't specify what exactly, it just mentions women in it. It could refer to a different type of intercourse
This is no different than Islamists saying that the Quran is progressive
The quaran hasnt had any progressive additions bruh
Except it did, to the Torah and the Bible, so for them it's progressive
Gay marriages were legal in copper age Mesopotamia
why are you guys still awake
I woke up not long ago
Not catering to gays does not mean "Going back to the bronze age"
Not everything revolves around the LGBT
True
soooo lets take back right from black people then
What's this guy even on about
and women in general
that was once considered progressive
society also didnt really liked those too
Genuinely funny how atheists think they're different from religious people when they both try to force their ideology
I know I know Good Morning
The 1992 Danish sci-fi film has themes about this
basic human rights aint an ideology tho
Is it 00:38 there
Best movie they ever made
A film where gays and misogynists find common ground
You're conflating accepting gays with normalising the LGBT ideology
Yes I think most of them are
Maybe not most but idk
Usually only if they're men, they hate women because they steal a potential mate from them
youre the one talking about "Not catering to gays" tho and how something progressive might not be that good
There's also a schism between gay men and lesbians
how
It's common to develop hate towards things you know well or don't know at all
you think that woman could have a chance with gay men?
I keep a safe distance from people who are full of hatred
He means that they steal other men from women
Gossip is poison
"They can be gay if they want" is not the same as "I support and promote their political and social positions such as gender self-identification, changing traditional definitions of marriage and gender roles, and activism around representation and education", one is gays as a people, the other is an ideology
That“s true
if you dont believe that trans women are women then no, you're not fine with it at all, the idea is to accept people and dont force them to be how you want them to be because you shouldn't give a fuck
also i dont see whats wrong with education on this, its wrong to teach kids people like this exist and don't deserve to wish them death?
This is literally no different than their rhetoric, "If you don't think like me then you're evil and wrong"
i don't like my upstairs neighbour, im not gonna argue that he's less of a human and doesnt deserve to get the same treatment as the rest of us
It's wrong to indoctrinate your children to your ideology, regardless if it's as ISIS soldiers, hardcore Zionists, or gender-benders
how is that any kind of indoctrination
What's the difference between a Wahhabi brainwashing their child into believing Jews are pigs, and an LGBT parent brainwashing their son/daughter/it into becoming gay
For you one is good
For me both are bad
its literally impossible to being brainwashed into being gay. If those kind of things was possible, gay people wouldn't exist since they would be brainwashed into "traditional" values from birth
false, some studies proves that a kid has more chance to turn gay if he is exposed to homosexuals more than others
That's objectively false, if you normalise something for a child then it's certainly going to grow up to think in that way
also convertion therapy would work
you mean come out gay
And that's not exclusive to gays
no, i mean turn gay.
that its normal, yes. It's not gonna magically turn anyone gay. You can think that something is normal without instantly starting to like it.
If I indoctrinate my future children into thinking that Danish "people" are evil do you think they'll see them as good people when they grow up in a society that accepts that Danish "people" should be hated
What's exactly normal about indoctrination?
do you seriously dont see a dofference between sexual orientation and beliefs
I do, but I think this is the third time I say that you're conflating accepting gays as people with promoting their ideology
you seriously can't read and make informed assumptions or what
ok it was definetly interesting, youre getting slow tho
and you go in circles
"It's normal to indoctrinate your children because they might not turn out gay"?
interesting take
This is like the 4th time you resort to personal insults when you run out of logical arguments
sure man
same time tomorrow?
Shouldn't we remove straight propaganda as well
Or at least increase asexual propaganda since there is enough straight and gay propaganda out there
Yes
No
Propaganda is propaganda, it doesn't matter if you're gay
No point bro, you can't hold a civil discussion with someone who disagrees with you
It's a sign of low intelligence
Shouldn't you focus on straights then, they won the propaganda war while gays are underdogs
It's straights that own the economies and religions
Wym "you"
The anti-propaganda guy
I was just explaining to Karrin how his ideology is no different from religious rhetoric
She's not wrong tho Catholics didn't even condemn Nazis that much when they were in power
you'll still come back tomorrow to this tho
They are programmed to not hate anything or at least they claim to be but it's not true, I have seen a priest squash a shield bug in front of me in 2019
I still remember it and it opened my eyes
That's only true if you think pope Pius XI didn't exist
Another sign of low intelligence is surrounding yourself only with people who agree with you
I don't think he did much compared to their actions
But then could be simply because the Holocaust wasn't in full motion yet
I mean he did what he could as a pope, he criticized it and the church distributed material that worked against it, it's not like Catholic clergy wasn't persecuted either
This is pretty much what they do, or should do, with the LGBT ideology
Did he? He probably could have risked way more as the Pope. Also no the clergy was persecuted under Hitler perhaps, Italy gave power back to Vatican City with the Patti Lateranensi
Nothing says persecuted like restoring the literal country that it deposed few decades earlier
He did, and they had their own VIP section in Dachau for it, what else could the pope do? It's not like he could spawn God and stop it
the pope, how many troops he have - Joseph Stalin
Around 1000 of them died in Dachau, idk if it's a good idea to play numbers when it comes to persecution
He's the head of the largest branch of Christianity, killing him would cause a lot of outrage. And isn't Dachau in Germany
1000 doesn't seem that many, was it just Italian clergy or German, or both
And when did it happen, did it happen when Italy was under German occupation? Because this changes a lot
He used to have many troops, now he only has a bunch of guys in funny dresses
Neither, they were mostly Polish clergy
That's completely different then
How though
I'm talking about Italy since he even supervised the pact I mentioned earlier, literal pact between fascists and the Catholic Church to regain some political power
He didn't risk persecution from Germany because Italy was still independent
Mussolini didn't even deport all Jews to Germany let alone the Catholic priests
Killing Polish people is also the second most Nazi thing ever, it's quite expected. Catholics were somewhat persecuted in Germany as well but not Italy for sure
That doesn't mean that the church fully agreed with fascism, they were granted autonamy and independence and the fascists used that as legitimacy
How's the blame on the Catholics
This is a Martini take
idk why would they do it in the first place while their factories are facing a serious lack of labor problem
it is like fuck themselves, literally
He could have not sided with fascists and nothing would have changed, they wouldn't have been destroyed or anything
They didn't do much in Italy when they had plenty of room to
"Fascism" isn't "If they disagree with me I will treat them well" though
They chose independence instead of dying/persecution
there's no tolerance to disagreements to authority in national socialism
not only fascism
See even Minecraft gets it
They weren't risking death or persecution by then, 7 years between Mussolini coming to power and those pacts
He's the Pope, it'd be like Hamas killing the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, it would cause outrage amongst Palestinians
What's your point though, they shouldn't have accepted independence because...?
Israeli... arabs...
My point is that they had plenty of room to operate without risks, I already said it. The autonomy thing is just proof that they weren't really against fascism that much either, they prioritised politics over spiritual integrity
How's that not against facism when they opposed parts of fascist ideology that didn't agree with the church's teachings and resisted state control over religion, which is what fascists want
They just negotiated to protect its independence instead of being absorbed by the regime, which is an objectively good thing and doesn't mean they sided with fascists or didn't do enough
fascism is bad only because they lose the war against allies
communism is bad because Soviet Union finally collapsed
it doesn't really represent the whole ideology would have a huge fatal issue
it is just the way they implement it is wrong or either they dismissed the idea
Hitler lose because he use fascism but only for including a very few amount of people, the pure Germanic people, this basically exclude the possibility of recruiting soldiers from other minorities, use them to generate economic output, also intimidation and killings caused huge social and economy disruption
Soviet Union collapse, well they simply found themselves too corrupt under few corrupted regime and they give it up
Mussolini disagreed with Hitler as well
it is actually fuck your own war capacity and economy to use some extremely racist theory to exterminate the people in the country, it is useful and it kind of worked to convince people to provide justification for wars, but that is just a part
It's not really that big of a risk to say "yeah uh Italy should not follow Germany's path" as the literal Pope
What about Italy, they wanted to welcome Albanians into fascism and they were educating them on it
they wouldn't have an army that could retain Albania in the first place if they weren't fascist
they had some nice policy but their implementation is too lame
Mussolini's regime isn't a full takeover, it is a coup, it was appointed, it has compromise to high ranks
Hitler's regime is a full takeover, there is a huge difference
regime is always the core foundation of a country, regime comprises people, and the power is born because one there is the actual force which is through intimidation, and the other path is to transfer interests
so basically if you want to be in charge of a country, whatever its institution, constitution, law etc. you need support from a powerful group that would back you for their interest
for Mussolini, he was supported by landowners, capitalists, usually upper class, and kings are actually neutral or a little bit favor to him
But that's what they did?
They opposed totalitarianism, racism, and state interference in religion, you're saying they should've directly confronted Mussolini and his fascist regime
What would that lead to besides crackdowns
Hitler was mostly supported by the radical proletariants, upper class, middle class, almost everybody besides socialists and communists would support Hitler at that time
because Germany suffered greatly after WW1 and with the treaty of Versailles, people are expecting a new powerful leadership to abolish it
that's how Nazi party could cheat through this, and they were supported by a lot more people than Mussolini
based on that, Hitler could actually implement more policy, or even which would target against some class of people, because there is the base of the support to do that
but for Mussolini, he can only do is to mobilize more poors, indoctrinate proletariants, he isn't dare to do something with his support base, capitalists
so that's a core difference
how you would take regime and how much you have taken over without compromise, directly defines your power
By signing the treaty they pretty much legitimised fascist Italy, before then they were doing their own thing in the Holy See
if you are compromised too much, you will have a dead administration, if you don't compromise at all, it is extremely hard or not possible for you to be in charge in the first place
it is same thing why KMT have failed their land reform because landowners opposed it, and they are in charge because of landowners' support
but communists are successful, it is absolutely the same thing, same project, but they can do that because they were supported by proletariants, farmers
No they didn't, the fascists used that as legitimacy, the church used it to protect and secure their people
That's not the same thing
It's like saying I helped a robber loot my house because I left it and chose my life, instead of directly confronting him
Minecraft wtf are you on about
Name 1 successful communist country
The only good thing about communist is their songs
Why did they wait seven years
Imagine that someone robbed my house and seven years later I think it's a bad thing
Because his regime wasn't strong enough, didn't it start off as a coalition government and not a full dictatorship? It's not like they immediately knew how bad Italy would get under his rule
It's not like Italy and the church were on good terms either, didn't they beef ever since like 1870 or 1880
It's not a communist country unless you ignore a massive issue with it
it is politically and in administrative
only the economy has a capitalist way to develop
That it operates on a state-controlled capitalist system
It's not communist if markets, private property, and profit-driven firms exist
only for the economy š
china is communism politically, economically its capitalist
the real communism never was applied also btw
That doesn't matter, it's a capitalist system with a communist ruling party
You can't have your cake and eat it too
you can cut your cake in two, it wont double it, it will remains the same cake
Son that doesn't work with definitions of ideologies ššš»
i mean it is the same country, if i made that cake and cut it in two im still the one that made that cake, as china is communist with a capitalist economy, dont play smart if ure dumb
like
its still china even if it 'split' the country, that's what i mean in general
its a communist country, nothing more
communism is not even real communism lmao
"It has several things that go against communism but it's still communism because that's just the silly economy, which communism definitely totally isn't completely based on"
How
Reminds me of my friend who says he isn't racist because he doesn't see the others as a human race to begin with
And itās really only nominally communist at this point, CCP stands for Chinese capitalist party now
Itās exactly like communism if you ignore the lack of worker control over production, the state, money, private enterprise, billionaires, and only focus on the political system which is characterized by an autocratic government where workers have no input
Guys anybody suggest a perfect movie? Im tired of getting high expectations and at the end I jus found out that it was overrated
he's right tho..
We need to raze politics all together and start over from scratch, everyone has lost the plot of what things mean
No
Capitalism doesnāt require a fully free market to still be capitalism
Communism, in its core, requires abolishing private ownership of the means of production
no, he is.
racism is a belief that must have the belief of 'multiple human races'
just ppl wants to change the original definition
he is xenophobe
Thatās closer to socialism, communism has a lot more requirements but this is still one of them.
Socialism = socialized ownership of the means of production
Communism = socialism + various other societal requirements like lack of a state, money, etc.
Capitalism = private ownership of the means of production in combination with wage labor obtaining value through economic coercion.
Feudalism = feudal (in this case meaning land owned by the crown and managed by lords) ownership over the land worked by serfs, with overt coercion to obtain land rents.
I would like the Chinese National Socialist Party
Not (nazi party)
And it was one
Uses a term
Ignores what it means by definition
"Using your strict definitions neither communism nor capitalism can exist in reality thus your whole point is nonsensically pointless"
Uhhh okay šš»
I want to discuss something with you guys
I believe anyone can build anything, And I don't mean it metaphorically or figuratively.
I donāt see the Pyramids, the Eiffel Tower, or other such things as impossible or strange; what's unbelievable is that the ancients were able to build them with such primitive tools. I think it took them much longer than it would take us today, and that's not surprising at all.
And I don't mean any offense to anyone.
i don't see the problem here ?
Can I built an empire which can rival Rome
Well that mean we are not different in the opinion 
If you have money and power I believe you can
I mean would united nation allow me to build one?
How can say the people in power right now canāt do it? I believe they can start it secretly 
Maybe some of them started even years ago
But I don't want it to be a secret, like I want to directly start wars with France, Spain, Germany, Balkan, Tunisia, Egypt and Iran
Directly I donāt think it may be possible unless you have a really strong connection with so many countries 
And you have to have reason
And sorry for my bad English 

Which countries to exact, and what if France use nukes on mee
I wanna restore the Roman empire
that what you will have to face if you started a war
, and I donāt know what countries
But even though all if this you still can do itš¤·š»āāļø

Yeah no shit Sherlock I can definitely conquer them
nothing is impossible
hitler won the elections, and won over europe in 4 years
I ain't Hitler, I am kitler
Yeah for sure
don't have to be hitler, it's an exemple
you can restart the roman empire indeed
So how can I start give me the blueprint
take with you people that have the same mindset, not difficult (mostly italian nationalists)
ally with trump, so he helps you military
Ummm interesting what's next
Hello
make him think you're a puppet state to him
Sup
and at the peak moment do a 'tu quoque'
Hru?
I am good how ya doing
Hold on where are you from?
I'm fine too, what are you doing?
france, why ?
Nicee I am planning to restore the Roman empire
Oh noo you are a gual
Ah, okay then, I guess.
a what
Why would you help me restore roman empire
You don't know that you are a gaul
How old are you?
why wouldn't i
Wanna join me?
actually im from algeria, i just moved in france in my young age
67
Well, I don't know.
i just deny my algerian blood and curse it
Six seven??
Nicee, I want numedian cavalry
Why?
Yeah I am 67 years old
i just dislike it
im mostly a french nationalist and traditionnalist, i want algeria to be french
Wth, do you know France did to Algeria
Are you from Brazil?
i do
no?
Not you bro
be specific.
Then why do you like France
And why you have a Russian flag in your bio
why would i hate it ? because it killed people ? like almost the 196 countries in the UN ?
And Greek in your username
this, bc im greek orthodox
russian glazer
I mean they did kill
But France killed your people and destroyed your country
false
the people, the country, was french
True
Ohh now I got it
You hate Algeria cuz it's a muslim country right?
Yeah not shit sherlock you are right
It wasn't
no, false, algerian identity was like a legend back then, being algerian was being french, having french paper, french passport, as algeria was considered part of the hexagon.
unlike others colony as guadeloupe that was considered part of the colonial empire.
probably i do
Sure mate yk i ain't arguing with you i don't have energy for that
Well I'm myself an Algerian
Whatever i am ngl idc as long as i can survive
no shit akenny, i know who you are dont play dumb
Brother its was an occupation and it doesn't remove the native identity of the Algerians living there
Ik who you are too Ruth ig
what identity? except being berber, and others folk living there, there was not any algerian identity
it was part of the french country, it was not considered as a colony after 1830
Are you out of your mind, Algeria is a modern Nation but the people living there aren't, they are native to their land and they are not french
It doesn't matter, and it doesn't remove the native identity of Algerians
algerian is also a modern term, only used after 1960
By that logic the French aren't French either because they aren't Franks
are you stupid, im talking about nationality, not identity at the start, being french does not make you less berber, you could be occitan while being french its completely diferent.
Oman, as Alger or Constantine were divided into departments, in administrative speaking algeria was french and algerians WERE FRENCH IN PAPER, so what France did, its not to algerians but to it's own folk, french
They are french cuz they're living in France as a citizen
Weren't Algerians considered French
they were
But that doesn't make France the owner of Algeria, it was occupied by it
after 1848 the territory conquered were not considered colony but part of the mainland
exactly what Corsica is today
Berbers and Kabyle Jews too are occupied by Arabs
algeria was not a country back then
it's also not occupation
Ik but again that doesn't mean France can legally claim the region of Algeria
by that logic even Paris is under occupation
Colonization to be exact
By who?
different, Guadelupe was a colony, algeria a region of france, being born in guadelupe was being guadelupean, while algeria was being french
franks, the folk coming from north france/belgium/benelux
In 21ce you don't call it occupation, it's a part of France
during the XIX or the XX it was considered as part of mainland france
same as what corsica is nowadays, its the same thing
centuries also does not mean anything
are french from the franks ? is francia the territory of the franks ?
are germans french then ?
Thatās an oversimplification tho Algeria was illegally part of france but most muslim algerians didnt have the same rights as europeaans and people from guadeloupe were also french citizens for long perioids not just guadeloupean
most muslim algerians didnt have the same rights as europeaans
they also were not considered algerians but ottomans.
from guadeloupe were also french citizens for long perioids not just guadeloupean
they had both nationalities after a time inside the island, while being born in Alger in 1900, had to make you french, 100%, that's all. nothing else to debate algerians were french as it was a french territory part of the mainland
nothing to be proud of being algerians also, its a curse
its egomaxxing there
Is it because you risk being remigrated along the other Algerians
i don't think far right gonna win 2027, i also have the french nationality so i'm not getting deported, im not illegally in france
What about 2040 and later
It's always a risk
i'm still french in paper, i have no risk
when Bardella talks abt algerians being deported its only the illegals.
france calling Algeria part of france doesnt erase the fact that muslim Algerians were ruled unequally in their own landd coloniial powers always try to redefine occupied poeople however they want legally that doesnt suddenly erase slgerian identity by thaat logic every occupied people in history just stoppekd existing becausee an empire changed the paperwork,
nationality != identity again.
algerians before 62 were french.
Occupied people often have no rights or their identities (whatever that means) will get erased quickly
as it should be
Sometimes it's annoying
while algerians had rights (less than parisian but still almost same right as a french citizen), some president embraced the culture
berbers are not even berbers nowadays lmao
their identity was erased and it's not cause of france
If they kept Algeria it'd be worse, most French people would feel like they are funding it for no actual gain just like Italy with the South
True
And thats exaxctly the oversimplification france legally classified algeria as french terhritory but mvost mnuslim algerians were denied equalb political rights and treajted as colovnial subjects in practice they were french on vpaper doesnt erase that they saw themselves andb were treated aszlgerians
mvost mnuslim algerians were denied
that's where you're wrong, since algerians as you call are not muslim but african pagan.
How
islam erased their identity MORE than france did, and can't talk about ottomans trying to put them under a false caliph
berbers were pagan
Like everybody but they quickly dropped their religion
they had a lot of rites, that got erased after the romanization and moreover the islamisation
when Zakiah exist it's not difficult.
quranic rule of islam for pagans or stranger, its a tax that MUST to be paid or its wether being expulsed from the country and be banned, or being killed if they dont pay it, or convert
Zakat?
Isn't that a universal tax to donate to the poors
They have jyzia tax but that's for people of the book
Doesn't this mean pagans were cooked
Pre islamic north sfrica absoglutely had indiggenous cultures and belisefs nobody denies thdat but identities evfolve everywhere through history rome gchanged themm islam changed them france tried to change them too tht still doesnt make frrench colonviavl ruleu any less colonial another culturef influenced thvem first isnt really a defegnse of occupation
Oversimplification+propaganda
quran 9.
What?
nah i meant the jizya mb wrong term
it's in quran 9
Yes, I don't think it's used for pagans tho except maybe India
So basically you are an insecure Algerian
pagans, christians, jews, anything that were not muslim
Do you hate USA and Russia
What does that mean
They just killed or expelled them, or forcefully converted
IF there were any. I doubt there were more than three pagans given how many centuries Christianity was there
usa is hateable
Yes
Wasn't it mainly for dhimmis
I never heard of pagans living under Islam except in India and random Southeast Asian sultanates
Lmaooooooo why do you have liberia flag in your bio with Russia lmaooooo
That's Ukraine
it was for people that were not muslim in general
Omg, I am talking about the flag next to the Russian one
ottomans did it to most folk they invided
Ah, that's USA but I removed all stars except one
But it's unlikely any of them were pagan already
Sorry but are you stupid
Lmaooo you don't even know American flag but you hate America
pagans were not rare at that time
By the time the Ottomans set foot in Europe pagans were only left in Fennoscandia and northwest Russia
They were bro
it just means he or she hates 49 states except 1
not at all
By 1400 most of Europe had no pagans, and most of those left were unreachable by Ottomans
Maybe but lmaoo it's liberian flag a country in Africa
Far from the Ottomans
Even the first Turks who took parts of the Roman Empire only conquered Christians
islam conquest no
It was Christian heartland
All you guys talking about
Is just nothing
Perhaps some in North Africa and Egypt with the early caliphates but even there it's unlikely
Anyways
roman empire was christian, just go in asia or africa and itt was full of pagan.
Bye
The last pagan temples were already closed, how many pagans would there be
bro isfrun knows its not usa it just looks like it
you must be trolling xux like crazy
I just said I removed most stars, I know it has 50 originally
if a church close that wont make me not christian anymore
It doesn't deserve any star
closing property does not mean it does not exist
You can't cover up, that you didn't know how USA flag looked like
Lmaooooo
If a church closes 200 years ago and there are no texts on Christians I will assume their presence is negligible
They'd be very few if any
In Italy, Greece and Anatolia I doubt there would be any pagans left
Even Syria Palestine
it's like saying if i close and destroy the quran no muslims will exist anymore, its useless to specific that, its from oral
pagans are rare nowadays, but at most the medieval time it was not
Pagan traditions also relied on the imperial institutions and support
ofc
By promoting Christianity and dropping all pagan institutions how many chances did they have to persist
due of christian imposition
but middle east africa and asia were pagans
Vikings too quickly abandoned paganism except in Sweden there it lasted a little longer
Norwegians can larp all they want yet they abandoned paganism quicker than the Danes
Isn't the only evidence of paganism there in 7th century the Quran
They didn't even find idols of any kind
what you define by pagan?
And it's known that Arabs produced plenty of idols and altars to pagan deities up until 4th century
Pre-Christian religion, or Christianity with heavy syncretism from those
I hate America šµš·

religion outside of judaism and christianity, yes
Thing is the syncretism likely happened in 3rd and 4th centuries and then was replaced by the real deal after it
If that makes you feel better
pagans were not rare since even byzantine had multiple laws against pagans
it's not even a European country why would I know what their flag looks like
Because there were pagans in the Balkans tho
only in europe pagans were not rare anymore, in asia or in Saudi territory pagans were massive
Such as Bulgars and idk what else
?
so pagans were still populated and not rare
Ah yes Slavs were still pagan initially
If you don't know then you shouldn't talk about it
But they were unreachable by Muslims
Slavs and Bulgars were in the Balkans and North of the Black Sea
About Bulgars?
during muhammad time pagans are often cited
Yeah
Only in the Quran tho, weren't they?
Are you Bulgarian
The other sources mentioning pagans were not even contemporary sources
and some others scriptures from hadith, witnesses, etc
No
Thought so
i don't believe quran is true anyway it's contradictive
Bulgarians are based and can recognise a joke
It's more reliable than the hadiths according to scholars
What are you?
bc it's preserved
Most Arab sources about pagans don't even come from hadiths but tertiary material
Which makes it even less reliable
By the time Islam reached the Balkan Slavs have converted to Christianity for something like 7 centuries
They kept some pagan traditions but those are a thing even today
Bulgars ceased to exist by then as well, they mixed with Bulgarians and their Turkic pagan traditions disappeared with them
pagans are not only european, it seems you think pagans are only european
No I just mentioned Bulgars
in africa there is still a lot of pagans nowadays
We were talking about North Africa and the Roman Empire tho
Most of those people are far from there, and yes multiple religions coexist there
talking that the real berber identity was erased before france came
It was yeah
Berbers are like 1% of what they used to be
But those that self identify as Berbers seem to be more pagan, could be some form of romanticism
The same way nationalists tend to admire paganism
romans were stilll pagans, so it does not change much
Idk I feel like the core Romans dropped all their myths and beliefs
It's hard to find anything at all about them after they converted
after 314 yes
i heard theres some new virus called the Hentaivirus or sum shit, yall stay safe man šš¾šš¾šš¾
you're late
the hentaivirus is decimating the acne covered gooners by the millions
where is yo girl
she got diagnosed with that virus
pray for her š š š
wot
I am also diagnosed with the hentaivirus
heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
I love Rakia.
Hello
Hentavirus is spreading
U know the hentaigana?
contracting a disease from a rat says a lot about you

i've never felt so asian before
no it's not... it just evolved
just like the Gallic identity merged with some germanic tribes and became French
evolved is literally a synonym
are ancient egyptians existing ? no (erase) cause they evolved
an evolution can also be forced
hello guys, I really want to start studying the english grammar and vocabulary but i don t know where to start, and i m bored of learning from books, I m B1-B2 at english by i lack knowleadge about verbal times and modes, and many other things, my accent is awful and my vocabulary is poor, isn t there a site or something?? What do you recommand me?
If you don't want to learn from books then try watching videos instead
I learned English from SpongeBob Squarepants and Harry Potter
@plain ruin nobu just sent me a dm and he is insulting jelly for some reason and your name is also involved
His latest alt got banned last night
š
Send me an ss in dm
Omg let me seeee
Tell the rest of us
dm
Add
Apostate Prophet
It was the same one that was D Wood Jr a few weeks ago
which was it before
where he convinced a mod with that account
Yes
oh
i thought he made another more recent one
a new one after that apostate prophet one got banned
nope, not yet
Spongbub
this is yours date of birth?
our car is older than that
What? lol
2011 kids are allowed on discord? damn im old
it just really feels weird having a 15yo in the chat that gets child marriage arguments
or pdf talking points
technically discord allows 13yo kids i think
and thats even worse
It should be 16+
in poland its 16+

it is in some countries
https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360050817374-Age-restriction
Being on the internet too young just get you groomed especially on discord
Some people say it like itās a flex 
a 19 can also get groomed
its not a question of age
More likely to happen to underage minors
yeah i joined when i was 13 and i 100% agree, spent my childhood catering to mentally unstable people saying they will end it if we don't pay attention to them, this isnt the place for kids
ofc, its like comparing babies skill to walk compared to a 30 years old, even if he walks better both can fall
Most fked up people with those desires donāt find people over 18 suitable anymore itās a messed up world we living in
If we did a survey and asked women all over the world that had Internet access since they were a child thereās like a 99.9% probability that it has happened to them before (not real stats)
definition of grooming applies to kids and teenagers, mainly minors tho
lmao yesss also, i stopped getting unwanted pp picks when i turned 18
the point of grooming still applies if we take away the predator thing
thats just wild
we are talking about 15yo kid
manipulating someone to gets benifits is a form of grooming
Another scenario, if you did a survey and asked every single women if they have experienced a traumatic un consensual experience, almost all of them would say yes they have
we're talking abt underage being groomed.
sis wtf just scroll up
i know a group that manipulates young girls so they mutilate and send ndes or else it can gets bad
So real
cmon that's lit our topic
15yo being on discord, especially here on #š§ ļ½serious-chat is like asking for something to happen wtf
im more in dark romance
you fr right now?
I already explained why they do this to themselves earlier in a discussion
š
Exactly and especially putting like your own pic as your pfp thatās not even a question
r u fricking stupid ? i was talkign abt the groom point so the topic was grooming you also answered the topic of the grooming so you're part of it omfg
ure such a troll karrin
can't even find out what a topic is
cmon
yeah i knew a 16yo that got pregnant with 24yo man, that doesnt mean its normal
well thank god her acc is clear and she has the basic discord pfp at least
it's objectively bad morally to be pregnant early
i'd argue that 15/16yo experimenting with people their age is pretty normal tho
not to the point of having a kid as a kid ofc
sex should be only with your wife/husband.
Why
it kinda is man, same as toddlers and newborns playing with themselves, its normal to be curious about your own body
It is
thats literally why age of consent is around 15 most of the time
we're not animals, we dont fck everyone cause of hormones and whatelse, your body should be preserved for the one you wanted and will end your life
a 24 years old with 3+ bodycounts is disgusting
We are animals
Key point
we're not primals and barbaric.
wdym "we"
Whatās barbaric about sex
we got moral also.
..?
not sex itself, but having sex with a lot of people
24yo with bodycount of 3 is completly normal, as well as bodycount of 30
why do you care lmao what does it change
Thatās not the point
The point is not waiting until marriage
3 is normal 30 is wild
why would i love a guy that already saw 3+ women naked and entered em ? its disgusting
Thereās limits to these things š
marriage is a made up social concept why do we care about that
it isn't
it might be wild, its no ones business tho
On god
secular marriage is a joke
how.
Why do you have to wait until being legally assigned to one another to have a lil fun
what animals marry each other
As long as itās protected
you ever saw a shrimp marriage sis?
marriage is an union you do infront of God
soooo marriage didnt exist 3000 years ago? lmao
so?
it did
nice, leave her be, more options for us
Your outdated definition no longer applies ubiquitously
hmm so its not just a union in front of god is it
being traditionnalist is outdated?
š
Yes
i'd score a baddie
god didnt exist 3000years ago? lol
glad to be then.
Your god didnāt exist 3000 years ago*
your god or god in general?
abrahamic god
prove it
Uh no
apparently fcking anyone around is good, nice generation with good concepts
that's what u assumed.
it dates back to bronze age when marriages were "created" 2350bc in ancient mesopotamia
so no
marriage didnt involved your god from the start
they as made up as word "abrahamic"
js say u get no play #Blessed
nice biblical knowledge
Girl
actually i got a lot of men on me
i just dont want to choose randomly
so marriage aint a union in front of god is it now?
civil marriage also exists
it is
What yall talking abt why body count
i'd suggest you wait till marriage and fuck off from anyone else
its a joke, not even a thing
Marriage is a serious union that transcends simply being a playa
ive more than 3 body, i feel digusted of myself lmao
because ruth is delusional and tries to justify thinking that bodycount counts at all
Why
Itās literally normal
no
You canāt even tell most of the time
Why isnāt it normal
soooo by your own definition you say that you're a sl7t?
Literally everyone does it
what
i wont leave a guy bc he has more than 1 body, i just see it as disgusting
a default can be embraced
you have 3, you dont deserve him lmao
you should have waited till mariage, you dirty prostitute
Sooo true
you think im not aware
bro š
lwk tried to end my life 3 times bc of that somehow
Is Ruth a street walker, confirmed? Iām joking
and you try to lecture others? shut the fuck up lmao
Btw Ruth arenāt you 18
so it took 7 times to go āthis isnāt rightā ..?
yeah
nah i was drunk most of the time
18 with 7+ bodycount? lmaoooo
Body count more than zero at any point in life is kind of degenerate when we have alternatives
What the fuck is going on
So you were basically groomed
DRUNK SEX ALSO HAHAHA
i did a mistake, so yes i can
you reminded me of that ludwig meme
In vitro should be the only way to support our species
ure such a troll
Traditionalist lecturing us on the morality of sex
Imagine engaging in primitive body confrontations
Letās preach self love and our right hand