#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 898 of 1
maybe
Because Israel ceases to exist without an external threat
Their main existance is contingent on Israel being a safe place for Jews
Saddam is gone, Bashar is gone, Hezbollah is gone, Hamas is gone, you guys are next
southeast regions of your country is a part of the greater israel i think
occupied land and it doesnt belong to the jews idk what israel is on abt
North is not the part of great Israel but south is the part of it like duhok and zakho and East erbil
https://youtu.be/9QXCkMTbrSk
hats off to raj shamami
Guest Suggestion Form: https://forms.gle/bnaeY3FpoFU9ZjA47
Trying to grow your Social Media? Talk to us - https://forms.gle/sJfksjy4K3rpNnvF9
Disclaimer: This video is intended solely for educational purposes and opinions shared by the guest are his personal views. We do not intent to defame or harm any person/ ...
Mfs do anything for eid gifts (I took my shahada for this reason)
That's a serious misreading of the fact that it was just as industrialized, with it being deindustrialized after the Brits came, which is entirely different. Also it wasn't unified as Brits sowed division. But yeah the Idea that the British could conquer a more advanced country is insane. Also by just as Industrialized it wasn't like Industrial revolution style, but rather the previous artisanal production methods, meaning it was less efficient.
ohh i thought they wanted all of mesopotamia
Only sulaimanyah left soo
@turbid dome Do you like Kanye West
nope
Okay good to know
Naftali Bennett has 0 credibility. He is a zionist. Israel accuses others to escape accountability for war crimes it commits or intends to commit.
Still doesn't make sense though, you're telling me a combined force of 300k colonised 180 million slightly less developed people
The numbers aren't adding up in my head
@weary belfry Can i get permissions to ban people with bad microphones in vc
Industrialized meant more that they exported a lot and had local artisinal industries, not at all comparable to european factories. So when Britain comes in and fuels division, it's easy for them. The issue is most people read "industrialized" and think of European levels of industrialization instead of that they had solid exports
Ban yourself.
good that nobody asked you
My honest reaction to complain like that
Who cares
Lil stupid sensitive
Lil child
Yes but the Brits didn't have alien technology and rayguns, just simple muskets, I don't get how they sustained a colony of a 1:600 ratio for almost 200 years
collaborators. Like the Indian rich people and royals got stuff out of it too
easy ragebait and now go to bed
Nobody's like u twin
Yes they had like 300k Indian Sepoys employed after a while in British Raj, but to begin with they only had like 70k British soldiers
Would you say that it would be unsustainable if it was just the Brits
yes
its okay
U were nicer before
Idk what you're going through but it doesn't justify your karen behavior
I wish i can

At least we went out fighting
All our noble and aristocratic class was replaced by the Swedish one
Indians did the same thing as Latvians and Estonians, their rulers sold out, some even changed ethnicity to fit in
May God saves us from this situation
You could even ban me for lagging in vc cuz of dc ban
That's what I'm saying bro, if they made the slightest effort to combat the Brits they would've crushed them, they outnumbered them by a massive margin
LLMs seem to be underestimated at times. They helped me a lot pass classes, they can explain and simplify concepts for students.
What juice were the Brits drinking that enabled them to colonise half the world ts makes no sense to me
I guess it was easy to do after most of the Indian ruling class was tired of the Mughals, they sold out to the next bidder
I would never ban you
@weary belfry tbh god is always with me
Dude was trying to tell me that it was sticks vs weapon. But how fast could a guy with a musket be able to reload to ward off a ratio of 1:600
I smell a lie
Why should I lie
Mars!!!
Iraq
Atlatico madrid
Im saying this due to our yesterday convos
idk what you mean
bro leave me alone
I thought why are friends
Are you this soft bro,i literally only sent you 3 messages tf
We had a couple of conversations, you mean this one where we talked about from which viewing things from different perspectives
Nah bro
We already moved this
Im talking about our convo in general chat
Bruh
Nah
They probably had guns too which makes it the more embarrassing
Holy shit they literally did
they were collab w small rulers or you u can say small fragmented groups
so that both of em can take advantage of it
It simply wouldn't have happened without the support of Indians
that's what i said have you read what i sent ?
did i say india was developed?
it was just rich in resources
not developed in terms of weapons and all
I didn't say you did, the other guy did, and he blamed the Brits for colonising India when Indians themselves helped the colonisers
British Raj is 100% Indians doing
Can you imagine how colonialism would've developed had the colonial age taken place after the invention of semiautomatic and automatic weapons
they arelady had rivalry amongst each other
yep
it is true
Literally DOOM or Warhammer 40k scenario
do you wanna see the oppression ?
You'd be speaking Swedish 100%
I wouldn't exist
he failed in school most probably
Nova Suecia to the East
I remember I argued with an Indian in Hindu vc and he told me reservations for women are holding back India because men are smarter and should have access to higher education without hindrance
These guys want 50% of India to not have a job and just sit at home
u can't argue with stupid ppl
reservation should be demolished
any kind of reservations
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169
data is from science.direct
killed 10s of million of people
India is a major emerging power, that's the truth, and it's involved in major conflicts!
@true pilot hey, it has been a long time since i had a friend like you i talked with. I'm sorry for my misjudgement about you. you don't need to forgive me, i'm just ashamed of myself, i shouldn't have jumped to conclusion therefore, i hope you don't think badly of other people just bc of me because i just believe the worst in people. That is my habbit, i'm sorry. I really am. I didn't want to lose an online friend who i quite enjoyed talking to, but i did and that is my lost. I hope you see this somehow. Have a nice life.
yea but India is hollow from the inside. We should be growing at a much higher rate but due to fkin corruption we arenāt able to
@true pilot can you forgive him bro he has changed and he's no longer the man he used to be
i don't think he will and that is fine, i learned my lesson. it is his choice. I just wanted to say goodbye. It was great meeting a soul that understands you and sees you, but ig that was meant to be for a short time.
Move on brev
Yes, but that's the problem with every country, unfortunately, it's always those in power who dictate the "democratic" rules.
š„²
What? Kkkk
i mean I feel bad for my own people
Let's hope that we never have an ex like her in the future
population & corruption
lmaoooooooooo
India?
yep
India deserves better people
deserve literate politicians
Me
I'd make India so great
Akhand Bharat? Only I can do it
How would you do it
Pakistan issue:
- Sell them Bihar in return for no military presence near Kashmir
Or - Buy Gripen jets from Sweden to destroy Pakistan
Caste system:
- Annex Bangladesh and unite all Indians into hating a common enemy
Economy:
- Import more Jews
Education:
- Make even more reservations for less affluent people
This would 100% solve all Indias problems
@gusty fox where are you from
Morocco
fr?
Give this man power right now
Makes sense, it was either that or Moroccan, those are the only Mouads
I see
Which one is worse
One with stronger football team
He said Algeria
Mashallah
No, I'm just pretending
What happened to India people guys, sorry but don't know about this
Hello!
Hello are online people in this room chat?
Ramadan Mubarak
Hi
Idk either dude. World is big.
Hi mate where you from
Yeah but people often talk about this so i just want know
I'm from Indonesia
I guess it's kind of a big thing because both countries have nukes and get involved in a lot of conflicts. If they go to war, they'd destroy a big portion of our planet.
The conflict seem to be mainly religious. Muslims ruled over India and suppressed Hindus for centuries, then came the Brits with their colonialism which a lot of people say deepened problems between Hindus and Muslims. When the Brits left, the country got split to Pakistan and India, both sides massacred each other. It seems to all revolve around that.
Also, India since 2014 seem to be under the control of some crazy conservative Hindu fellas, which has been causing minorities to suffer.
Right if this happened i have Faith Will be scared because i didn't imagine impact to the world
The other thing is that it's not even clear that the formation of Pakistan was popular among Muslims at the time, it seems to have grown in popularity since the creation of Pakistan but it seems like Pakistan was created by Brits to keep the subcontinent divided and serve as a western outpost.
Hello chat!
Seems like america was created to harbor pdophilic fantasy islands
Better than previous government
Even Christians have been facing attacks.
Small fight happen all over time
Why we care about them
Hm?
Why not? Aren't they human beings?
These Hindutva monkeys, dude.
They think we are humans?
Whatever bro
It's so small
We both are same
Your people have a very nice reputation of sexual violence and abuse.
Oh
If you want a collective judgement, then yes you are evil. It's silly of course, but it's right using your stupid mindset. If someone has your fascist mindset, and is looking from outside, they'd label you not humans just like how you do with Muslims. But what can I say, you are a biased fascist, just like the rest of them.
Leave it, I don't know what to say
You certainly don't
It was, we were coexisting for many years before that
It's a constant exchange of killings and plays that provoke each other
Maybe the Brits made the issue worse, but I don't think the Islamic imperialism in India was angelic before the British colonialism.
How so?
Idk bro, I started to think you aren't trustworthy.
Don't ask me anything,I just give u my opinions

Of course you don't have historical knowledge, what was I expecting from a Hindu fascist.
I know enough
But i don't think I can debate with those knowledge
Sure buddy
What
Ok
Thatās what Iām saying, Jeffery Epstein wasnāt just a child sex offender
Heās the core link of providing luxury services to rich class of people
It wasn't much worse than the alternative but their last major ruler bankrupted the empire and was excessively warmongering
It depends on the individual ruler, some of them were nicer like Akbar, some of them were insanely bad for locals like Aurangzeb
Aurangzeb is incomparable to the British though, they took assets out of the country, made mass forced labour populations, excessive unchecked factories, they are the reason slums exist as well, not to mention dehumanisation and using the Indian subcontinent to fight the world wars, while starving the people and not paying them
There was also the opium issues, millions of households (not just people) were producing opium forcefully for the British
Arguably if any of these were happening during the Mughal period, the numbers would be less than 10% of what the brits did
He's a straight up weirdo dawg, he knows what he's saying, why do you think he deletes his shit š
And people forget that before the Mughals, the Indian subcontinent was a bunch of Kingdoms that always fought each other
Oh did sheen come in?
Nah, the hindutva guy
Oh
Sheen was here a week ago or so
Sheen is active, seems like #š§ ļ½serious-chat message
9 hours and not yet deleted , very impressive
He's got some messages not deleted for a week
ššš
I see.
Most important thing is #š§ ļ½serious-chat message
Mf said he doesn't consider Muslims to be human.
They say "India never invaded other countries"
Yeah because India was a bunch of Kingdoms invading each other š
He said before that he is atheist, I really hate it when non-religious people lick religious people boots, especially when the religious people are fascists.
Idk why he thinks deleting his messages would prevent him from anything
Him saying he's atheist is like saying Nobu is Muslim
Because he is stupid I guess.
I generally stopped reporting people because the mods get bothered by it apparently.
No one is paid
Or driven for that matter
Wdym?
Mods nowadays aren't really caring enough about these dudes
His brief Edating attempts were awesome too š
š
Hail Benjamin Netanyahu
If you read the history of rajasthan you will learn about the Islamic invasions. During the invasions there were brutal acts committed including the graping of women because of this especially in rajasthan women performed Jauhar. When a Hindu ruler and his people went to war, they knew they were never going to come back, as he fought with the determination to defeat the invaders. The women were aware of what could happen if their husbands were killed and the kingdom fell. To avoid capture and possible assault, some women chose to perform Jauhar in which they collectively entered a fire to end their lives
even at the time of akbar's regime too
women did self immolation
and he did execution of thousand's of people
Itās quite rampant and regular that in ancient and old times once an army is about to conquer a place the first thing they are gonna do is rpe, steal, plunder, and kill mens
I wish such thing brought to light more often.
yup
I'd call em Turkic invaders instead of Islamic 
Itās almost a common thing that everyone would do no matter where they are
it was common in ancient times but it still happens
@distant epoch ignore the troll
In Chinese history it is even more rampant that we literally eliminated some groups out of the map completely
hahah ik
And the rest that survives, were either escaped or assimilated
Like the turks are escaped from the Xinjiang and they resettled in Turkey region
It's not exactly a wrong statement, by Islamic standards
Idk about these invasions, but the Mughals were notorious for drinking and even homosexual activities and marriages (or at a point very close to marriages), rhetoric around the Mughals in muslim communities say that they weren't "muslim" for this reason
Idk about these other invasions in particular since it doesn't mention whether the armies were Mughals though, that article says "Muslims"
Nothing really in Islam prohibits sex slavery and expansionism, that's the thing.
Whether they were criticized for not being "Islamic" during that time period was unknown
I think the main point he's trying to make is that "They're not muslims because of their other behaviours" which has some level of truth
Even though I'd still say those are more considered as "sins"
Islamic invasions in India started before the Mughuls.
It comes across as a distraction.
This legacy is seen with pride today by many Muslims.
They of course exclude bad parts.
But the idea of expansion is something they take pride in.
Yes, I'm know of their existence but they are barely talked about
Yeah atleast the commonfolk
They're still very benign compared to the hindutva, the hindutva are now saying "Return home" (Meaning return to hinduism) on national TV
even my ancestors were from rajasthan but the moved to uttrakhand ( mountains near north east)
and then created a dynasty
katyuri dynasty
Sounds familiar
yep they fought with the islamic invaders & gorkhas
but eventually they also got defeated by the britishers when they collab with the gorkhas
@distant epoch I wonder whether or not you reject Hindutva
i think it's a political view
and i don't have any opinion abt it
I saw all kinds of crazy things from them over the years
tbh most of the indian politicians care about their position but not the people
hindutva and gazwa e hind
ppl r regarded
Both seem to me like symptoms of the same illness.
Both are same, Hindutva gang just have better reach, funding and stupid dressing sense out of all fascists
It's very weird to me that this is common in religion. Instead of admitting someone who shares your religion does bad things and calling it a sin, just automatically excommunicate them
Seems much more honest to just say they sinned than to say they aren't of your religion when they clearly believe in it
They are generally prone to exclude each other
I see different Muslim branches and sects do this often. The accusation of heresy has always been around.
"We are the real good ones"
Political reframing
Sins are just mistakes but w different name
Yup
Except sometimes theyāre not mistakes
But go against religious doctrine
There's perfect word for those āØthreat'sāØ
"you don't belive in me, you're going to hell"
Yayyyyy
If you are a woman, I don't think Islamic heaven is much fun.
Well too bad bcs there aren't better options
Except āļø
Actually, the eastern idea of rebirth with better status for those who lived good lives is more fair and interesting.
Fairness and Interest are some of the most objectively subjective factors you could have chosen to confidently assert as facts, good work.
It sucks that death will be the end, and that it's often not meaningful nor comfortable. Muslims talk about that often as a way to try to convince you that their idea for the afterlife is good, but they ignore how ridiculously weird it is.
The reverse is used to justify wrong though, "You are poor so you must've been evil in your previous life"
What factors do you choose?
You don't have to worry, those kinds of ideas are dying and have been dying for a while. The new world is very sciency.
Doesn't it imply that everyone one was at times in a good place, and at times in a bad place?
Fairness and interest are objective...? Oh dear
: ) read the thing
Who actually wants rebirthš man I don't need second round just to pay more taxes
#serious-chat
It's still in topic. I just pointed out that it's pretty stupid concept
Life is bigger than just paying taxes I guess.
How well are the cultures that subscribe to those ideas doing compared to cultures that prescribe to ideas that are different and coincidentally completely opposed to those ideas
The problem is that it just doesn't apply to the real world
Richer/higher status people kept wealth because they were born into good families
It was used as a means to say "you're poor because you deserve it" to people just born with bad circumstances/into families who were cheated/stolen/oppressed
The implication may exist but in practice it's meaningless
Wouldn't life's value lose completely if everyone gets second attempt
"We treat you like this because of something in your alleged previous life"
Not really, I would choose this life every single time (and mind you I have like at least 5 more decades in the tank) it would be offered to me for rebirth. Not a stupid thing. I understand why the average person would find it hard to think about though.
Wellness is an objectively subjective factor as well.
Hopefully no one is photosensitive.
We got nothing but to wish
Not as objectively subjective as fairness. Your opinion of what's fair can be whatever, but how well a group of human beings are doing regardless of their opinions is quite a measurable thing, even if you find that hard to believe.
Humans are, after all, predictable. Not as predictable as the average wild animal, but predictable.
Sure, let's see how that line of thinking turns out. Always curious. I beleive everybody should do exactly what they think is right, instead of pretending. Natural selection works faster when people are honest.
"average person" comes off as really selfishly... But yea the concept is questionable still. If you're born poor you've still chance to improve your life. If you blame it on life you assumably already lived, you're just lazy
I don't get the last bit, but I wasn't trying to sound selfish with the average human remark. Most humans, are like, (scientifically observed) wired to not think about the end of their life as much as possible. Or at least pretend that there is one, I mean a life after they're dead. So, yeah. The average human does have a hard time thinking about death in detail.
Wellness is still defined differently from person to person. You are obviously putting my statement under more scrutiny than yours.
y'all sound like a 40 yr old unc
Atleast we're not morons that send flashing imagery that can potentially induce seizures in a public chatroom
ignores
The thing is, your action would still be affecting you and humanity at large including people around you of course. I think it gives your actions more meaning because they'd echo more in your cycle of life and deaths, and in other's cycles as well.
No actually, I put my own statements under far more scrutiny, because I have no incentive in correcting you since I gain no pleasure from it, but I do gain pleasure from being objectively correct. I stated that the measure of fairness can heavily differ (one might believe anybody with "x" train deserves to die, and others might think that that is fair), but how an outfit of human beings (the species, homo sapiens) is "doing" based on their biology and fundamental drives and other factors, and also modern factors in the post-industrial age, such as GDP, can really help analysts figure out wellness factors, which are of course made up, duh, everything is made up and is a result of our senses, but anybody can reasonably assert that it is much easier to objectively determine (through science) how well a human-group is doing than comparing what is objectively fairer (unless of course it is an argument geared from the start to be about which idea/religion/ethic school is "fairer", the whole discussion can revolve around what the word fair even means) but yeah
not train, trait*
I accidentally revealed some personal information here but whatever.
this is fun
Okay fair. Death is something hard to think about. Where do you even start processing it? Usual questions like what comes after and where do we go are just speculations. Meanwhile I don't agree with religions, I'm jealous of religious people who finds comfort in their religion and how it helps them to deal w death. I'm not scared of dying, I'm more of "what if that and this are right".
Religion is largely a default in human psychology. If you left a group of say 100 people on an island and they had no memory at all, of anything human, cultural and so, they WOULD develop religion, that's a guarantee.
Yea makes sense
Well, a near-guarantee.
If you are going to abandon religion or God you really, really should be making that choice voluntarily as a result of a long chain of thoughts (obviously there's more to it) rather than after watching a YouTube debate.
It can be hard thing to realise that your religion might not be true. It will take time certainly but people should be more open to new thoughts. There's just too many preventive things to just change for example fear of being wrong, scared of what comes after death, family etc
You say you "have no incentive in correcting you since I gain no pleasure from it" and immediately say you "do gain pleasure from being objectively correct" These conflict. Wanting to be objectively correct is an incentive to correct errors (in others or yourself). Also "incentive" and "pleasure" are not the same thing. Either admit the incentive or drop the contradictory clause.
And, Idk bro you dropped on the conversation out of nowhere and started scrutinizing the way I used fairness and interest when you are aware that it's another conversation to be had, but instead starting from there you asserted that they are the most objectively subjective factors.
I mean, I can understand that being said about interest, but I said what I said in a casual context not in a philosophical forum or something š
Yeah I mean even though we've gotten quite far, it hasn't changed the inherent evolutionary mechanisms within us. We're still going to be afraid to do anything that challenges "the group" because we associate "the group" with our survival. Largely, understanding these things helps a person break free from their basal instincts and observe what truly matters, and to understand what they are as well. Truly understand what they are.
āAlso you donāt need upwards social mobility because thatās what the next life is for, until you reach enlightenmentā
This is my second day on the server (active) and I decided to say the first thing that popped into my mind š¤·āāļø
also bro your strongest argument is about what gives me pleasure. lowkey.

I'm glad to have you around actually, you sound like an intelligent guy (I hope you are).
Post here more often because often the channel is crowded with brain rot or casual conversations.
Btw, what do you think about morality?
Mango is the best fruit no glaze . š
Right when I mentioned brain rot, ok.
š©āš¤ always let them know your next move š¤
same as most other things surrounding human action. Firstly, we are almost guaranteed to have different, wild codes for morality. that's evolution at work. Secondly, it's also guaranteed that the best code, given the context of it's existence, will spread.
There's a reason why historians shy away from interpreting history from a modern ethical lense. Because the environment changes. And nature forces you to adapt. This is the low level morality explanation for humans.
Speaking at a larger level, I mean, it kind of gets self evident what the correct code is. that's all I'll say.
You can not be serious this the first post i see when i open
You live in blood land with blood debts
The clock ticks, zionism is an actively abrasive pogram.

Us presidents when the western wall
Will my fast break if I say shabbat shalom today
Technically shabbat will start after Iftar
small mind in a large body
wtf you doing here
I was always here
Gay
damn, horsey have changed, horsey no longer a horsey
Yez
RIP i will you my dear horsey
....
Two rakat of Tawbah for that comment
šÆ
..
LMFAO that's the reality
Zionism program is justified and divine driven by enormous dedicated Zionists
and they already achieved some of the goal
Zionism are welcoming everyone regardless of their ethnicity, status, race, gender or religious allegiance to contribute to this giant goal of making the holy land under control of the holy State of Israel
Rule 01: Outrage as many ppl as possible regardless of the consistency or truth of the allegations
there's no Palestine
Zionism is not a religion, it is an ideology
I'm 100% consistent with my arguments
there's no Palestine
Palestine is a historical region that refers to a province of Ottoman empire
or refers to the British rule of Palestine mandate
saying something divine does not mean that I promote religion movements
It does
it is not a country and it does not exist
You're religious šš»
?def divine
Definition 1 (adjective): emanating from God
Definition 2 (adjective): appropriate to or befitting a god
Definition 3 (adjective): being of such surpassing excellence as to suggest inspiration by the gods
Other definitions can be found here
I'm really not
God is not religious now?
I'm stating a fact that they would correlate this with religious struggle of Judaism or something but that does not mean that I promote that crap
you can't say that I personally think religion is a shit but refuse to recognize the existence
You do
You support zionism.
You just said zionism is divine driven
You support a religious movement
Therefore you're religious

I already proved it 1000 times
it was divine driven but not by me
I never correlate these between myself
Doesn't matter, you support it so you accept its existance
This is like someone supporting an Islamic Jihad but saying "Uhh I don't believe in it"
why tf you have to believe in it to support it ?
I support it because I earn fucking tons of profit
what bro who would believe that crap
Yes
You believe that it will increase your profits 
I believe in money, I believe in power, and Zionism movement represent the power of the IDF and the will of the nation of the State of Israel
Could just say that btw
you don't say what you would say in propaganda don't you ?
The "Greater Israel" and all that stuff looks dumb
not really
For example I only support Palestine because I don't want their immigrants in my country
then why don't you support to deport them back to Israel ?
How does Zionism related to profit?
I'm slow here.
and Palestine does not exist, in reality
no entity that could represent Palestine hold effective control over the territory it claimed
therefore it does not exist
it is but only represent Hamas
Hamas does not represent Palestine
Interesting.
Wait does it mean there is no China only CCP?
It won't change anything, the next generation will be migrants too
If you go that route
there is China because CCP represent as the legitimate ruling party of China
Only solution to Palestine/Israel stuff is making Jerusalem Christian
you better start to support IDF really quick
I can't
Sweden has had beef with Israel for decades
I'm not a CCP member
none of my business
do you want peace ? I don't want peace
there's no war, there's no profit
yeah
on this issue yes
No, I want that whole region to become Christian, it's the only solution
peace is better for business...
Are you for real?
Jews and Muslims cannot behave
I never agree everything that CCP does lmfao
Should we move to open-source software in response to growing corps greed and how they are trying to destroy our privacy and put an to online anonymity?
I'm doing an investment in both American and Israeli military industry
@fresh flower@toxic lake@thorny steeple why are y'all taking Minecraft seriously?
what do you think
He's being honest
I'm aware but, isn't open-source safer?
He just admitted that he only supports them for financial gains
Github is owned by Microsoftš„
exactly
if they can't earn money for me why the heck I would support them
Nothing wrong with that btw
for personal preference it was justified for me to support them
I support the powerful side, no matter what
š·šŗ š®š±
Russia isn't powerful š
Israel could colonise them
It's the most popular so, a lot of open source codes are based in there.
Russia is struggling against Ukrainian farmers with 2 decades old donated weapons. If Finland invaded Russia rn they'd have completely control in 2 weeks
Russia is miserable
It's unfortunate they'll probably win the war because of European cowardice and American stupidity.
Isfrun and Duck themselves could march into Moscow
First part makes no sense why give them weapons they can't use
Pov: @fallow shard marching to Moscow.
They'll also run out of people soon, they need to call in the over a million men hiding in Europe
lmfao
Brother, he doesn't believe in morality to begin with unless it's enforced or something š
Even for his goal, maximising profit, he alienates so many potential allies.
He seems to be mostly trolling here often too, so just ignore him.
What is he thinking?
?def gratis
Definition 1 (adverb): without payment
Definition 2 (adjective): costing nothing
Chats go up and things disappear anyway. Don't take it to seriously especially when people are ignoring the person. That guy isn't seen as an intellectual here or something.
If someone does engage with him and is becoming convinced of some of the bs he says, which I think wouldn't happen anyway, I guess there you can intervene. But even that intervention would be better to be engagement with the person changing their mind, not the femboy CCP supporter.
is the person who tries explaining their already confusing statement to someone using more complicated words the one with the brain in this situation?
it took me a time to frame that
Fair reaction.
He doesn't know what does free mean in this context.
Proceed to use French jargon to explain it.
That will help him for sure.
il ne parle pas en francais mais il parle en latin.
š
hola
huh Latin is still in used, huh?
I thought it's dead.
i have seen it used sometimes in words like quid pro quo from the tv show
suits
latin is use for naming animals and plants
Ok
Bonjour gentlemen
like from the coyote and roadrunner show they name them in latin in start
WHAT
Thing
- I'm freed from reservists
- I don't like pink that much
Pink is so cute
i agree i saw barbie
What did Minecraft do now
how do i get higher role i think my english is good enough to move there
do you know what I'm thinking when you are saying this to me
I think everybody knows me would know what I would say typically to respond with such word
Don't listen to them
You're very strong for 165cm
They're just jealous
š¤£
More likely what he was "punished" for is "leaving Islam"
I don't think so. Leaving Islam generally is not a crime, but they arbitrarily detain people over such things.
Some of the times they detain/criminalise it by saying "These people are causing disturbances in society"
Converting to Christianity too is not a crime
And they use that as a means to persecute, iirc
Bros getting Salwan Momika'd
But only conversions that the Egyptian state and society accept are ones from Christianity to Islam. Unfortunately, some Christian women are kidnapped and forced to convert by some Muslim men too, and there's no way back after that.
I have a question, are u a christian yourself?
if yes, then I would say your statement isn't valid!
Whatš
It is valid
@plain ruin u got a lot of work to do now
It only counts as 50% valid if he was a woman 
He works?
give solid Proofs
In server š
it could be their are making it up to create assumptions on others
Boring ass propaganda series
Okay bro
I'm non-religious, but I live in Egypt.
okay, have u seen that yourself
Yes daddy
or heard it from someone else
Seen it personally, no. But you don't need to see things by yourself to know it's happening. We know Nazis did horrible shit although we didn't see it with our own eyes in real-time.
I'm Egyptian and I'm mostly well aware of how our culture works, I believe it's a result of being a middle class person.
how we know it maybe we read that in history books or old newspaper, but it doesn't mean everything is true some can be wrong in different scenarios. and in your case what said said means to me you r trying to blame muslims
We know because such events are extensively documented by parties that have no interest to lie.
Add to that, as I said, I'm Egyptian and I know my country. I spent some times in the streets and I know how much a lot of Egyptian Muslims despise Christians.
You need another woman to collaborate this, your witness is only worth 50%
And interestingly, Christians are more tolerated than other religious groups
Muslim countries have this gimmick of barely tolerating one religious minority legally and socially 
For Egypt, it's only Christians. The rest are seen as deserving no rights.
lmfao
Hm
I was just typing to justify that facts he said
@fresh flower Copts are often seen like how conservatives in the west see Jews. People say they run the country secretly and do perverted stuff in churches and kidnap and kill Muslims and all of that baggage 
No you accused him of blaming Muslims. According to Sharia you need another woman to verify your witness, yours alone is worth half that of a mans
as you said u are Egyptian, do u have a trend to hate your own country, because I was trying to another person, u are the second, and he sounded like a traitor to me and was saying so many bad things, like Egypt is the worst county and stuff like that
Hating your own country isn't a bad thing
I wouldn't be surprised tbh, Christian miniorities are powerful everywhere, like India, Jordan, and other places
I did, because I haven't heard anybody say like that.
who knows maybe he is saying it according to his own circumstances
What if you haven't heard it because atheists are scared of repercussions
It's like Saudi Arabia saying there are no gays in Saudi Arabia
They're just closeted
Minorities always have a reputation for running everything in secret lol
Shall one glaze the country they are born in even when it does something wrong?
Also, I instinctively love Egypt, but Egyptian Muslims disown people like me just for not believing in a religion or leaving Islam so the mfs started it actually.
Some of them even reject Copts. Copts are barely seen as equals to Muslims in Egypt.
Of course things are different depending on socioeconomic situation of each area in the country, but generally speaking I'd say Copts are barely tolerated by middle class and poor Egyptians.
you are using a fucked weak asf of the fucking weak logic of "you are going to give a fuck about the weak while you become powerful" which is fucked and fucked
I might not be a very fucking stronger person right now, but you are on the fucking weak class
you go girl
just by that, you deserve to be a part of the weak permanently because you do not possess the mind of staying powerful
Is this a psychotherapy session?
okay shakespeare
does failure not befall anyone
so you're telling me your dad told you all this and you decided to preach on discord
fair enough
Is this where we learn English
No, this is where you learn psychology
Sure! Hereās the paragraph you asked for:
I believe failure plays a crucial role in growth and learning. Here's a brief reflection on why it's essential:
Failure is essential because it teaches valuable lessons that success alone cannot. It challenges us to grow, adapt, and improve by revealing our weaknesses and pushing us outside our comfort zones. Each failure provides insight into what doesnāt work, making future attempts more informed and resilient. Without failure, progress would stagnate, and growth would be limited.
Dm
I have a crush on this guy who is American but I donāt speak English very well. How do I confess my feelings whim
What do I say to this man
Swear that you are not ai
Ugh you guys aināt helping a poor girl
Sure! Here's the proof you asked for: As an existing AI model, I cannot swear to not being AI, however I am not AI so I can swear I am in fact a Homo Sapien
Fair enough
a joke
If I end up living a lonely life Iāll blame it on you
I know
Are u a minor ?
it is lost in times when im trainslating
Do I look like one?! š
Ohh yeah
minors are tougher looking they work in quarry like my grandparent in alsace
You do trust me
Man Iām NOT a minor ffs
That shouldn't be a big barrier. Just confess, if he truly loves you he wouldn't care about your weird accent and grammatical mistakes.
Just learn English going forward, it'll help you with a lot of things generally and certainly would help you communicate with him.
I think delaying confession is a blunder, in the time you are thinking about it someone else might confess to him.
i believe she is doing a joke of you
with you sorry
ly
Thank you so much! Youāre too kind š
I got you
Why would you ask if Iām a minor?
we are in a server with each of us she heard i join this server so she join to bully me sometimes
Cuz you have the mental materials of minor
Damn. Iām offended
Where do I report someone for bullying
you are the bully
Don't worry, you can make it up
Bros looking for minors
DOJ Headquarters, yesterday morning. In complete violation of The Hatch Act
US is a fucking joke
make america grate again
What's the hatch act
Chicken before the egg?
There will be repercussions and likely charges for every compliant party involved with this administration.
Great*
see poster
Maybe click the link before you ask that.
hi serious people
I don't trust links on discord it's scary
I like Nale
Especially not .gov if its American
For fuckās sake.
Is Nale single perchance
sus
š
I agree with Minecraft on this, it's a "piece of shit paper that can't be enforced"
Here @fresh flower You paranoid little shit. 
What will the Democrats do though
He can just keep violating stuff nothing happens
Probably continue to mimic jellyfish.
They act like this when they donāt have the senate.
more like senile
i cant believe people aint doing anything about the fact that trump is a pdf
what?
pdf?
srry
it is okay
like a dude who likes kids
Hm
the epsteins files gets me man
oh i got
lol
yes i see know
my bad never seen it say as pdf
frank sinatra good song
write a letter...., maybe.... or if you text him, just send one of those reels, or tell someone who is mutual friends with you to tell him... maybe?
oh she is a joker
Tf are they gonna do. Heās head of the guys who would normally arrest him.
Nale?
Minecraft donāt fucking say it
you are fucking done with your career to be a leader to admit you are wrong and you are weak
a leader will never admit himself a weak and wrong one
@shy summit your crush?
i am so confused
calm down
Weak? No? Wrong? A leader SHOULD admit when their wrong, thatās what taking responsibility looks like.
Yes
idk maybe is protesting still works
a leader would take absolute no responsibility on certain issues to maintain the leadership and authority power
if a leader could be wrong, what could be right, none
Nale muted me because he is sleeping at 3 pm and cant turn his phone off
Oh?
Authority doesnāt equate to being right my dude.
Trump fucked kids. Is he still right?
absolute power define things, and authority is what controls the absolute power
Is fucking kids right or wrong.
he's not the absolute authority
you could say Kim Jong Un is one, or Xi ? I don't think Xi has established total control over the CCP
Trump definitely wasn't the one that dictates everything
Trump is your leader you should respect him
I donāt respect pedophiles.
he is rich that is okay then because he just give the people money and they ignore he is not jail but he is presidential person it is unfair
it is wrong because it's violating the law of the United States of America
you should pray to Trump every day 2 times
what the flip?
Wait. . . You canāt just say fucking children is wrong?
it is wrong
fucking children is wrong, under the law of the US
morally
how is it okay for him to go and such items but no one bat an eye? only because he is there in the seat and the people are les incroyables morons
But is fucking children wrong, period.
it is wrong because here we are in the US soil and network space
????
But is it wrong in general.
Bruh
it is considered wrong because most countries prohibit such act against children
do you want a minit to think that sentence
š
before you speak it
what are you on about?
Iām gonna kindly ask you to rethink that statement Mine. Only so that this chat doesnāt eat your ass alive, . . .
to define right or wrong you need a subject and you need a perspective
pls calm down
Bud Iām not gonna say a thing.
you know why they implimented such laws? its because children do not have the maturity of an adult and the body of one,
Oh whatās happening
Which rape children
justify, trumps actions?
you can not be speaking that is okay? some kidren were age 9 year and more. they are not as big smart as adults. never okay in any way
exactly, and in most countries we had the law that clearly says and enforced that is crime and you will be sentenced under the law enforcement
@shy summit You wanna date me
oh sorry no ? so i did not see
He who holds gun has power
Vinyl. Iām obviously not okay with that shit. I object to it on moral grounds. Mine is saying he objects because itās illegal.
Wanna date me instead?
you are right I'm objecting it because it was illegal for some obvious reason
people don't like their kids to be threatened and government would made a law to prohibit people from doing that so that kind of making 100% sense
Iām being direct now; Is it bad independently of the law, or are you saying itās bad because itās against the law.
some people exist like so i did not think about this
Yes?
sad earth sometimes
Soon Israel will make it cheap to visit "their" country as a tourist to improve their image
How do you know if Iām single or not boy.
it is bad against the law, and it is generally considered bad independently of the law
I think I made my point very clear
Maybe I“m gay or Bi
Iām asking YOU. Not generally what other people think.
FACTSSSS
for me it is fucking bad I don't like fuck kids
but my principle does not allow me to define a thing is bad objectively that is independent of the law
Thank you, it took us three roundabouts but we got there in the end.
that's my moral principle
not really I hold 0 interest to do that
if there's no law I won't do that
āPolitics is all about lies
It doesn't matter as long as Minecrafts stocks go up
I don't approve him do that at all, that's why I said we need a new Republican candidate
no
šš
it is against the law, there's no interest to do that
yeah most rich people are under the law enforcement
even you had the case of Jeffery Epstein that exposes the whole thing
He who holds gun can enforce LRWEITP
Is it wrong to go to a country where itās legal and do that behavior there.
Say the law says nothing about it.
I would tend to not answer that question
personally I don't approve this move
Iāll leave it for the rest of the chat then. I think Iāve made my point.
I'm not a bad assh
I'm a human being
a nice one
Debatable
Why not?
because the source of define whether a thing is right or bad, is authority power backed by absolute force
you simply can't leave a thing to say it is bad because most people think it is bad, but it was not bad by authority
What counts as 'authority'?
who holds the absolute force and are able to enforce a will upon the people it rules
How does force determine what is right or wrong?
news government and public influencer
that was an easy question, if you are a general just conquered a city, your order is dictating the life of the citizens
every word of you is right to who you rule
it was backed by force, by sword, by gun, by cannon
by intimidation under threat
But how does that determine what is right or wrong?
nature v nurture
what do you think if I hold the gun and you say I'm wrong ?
household thinking
what will happen next
I think the great purge really explains a lot in this situation
Presumably you would shoot me
and you will fear that I would shoot you
I don't see how it follows logically that you are right
so you would follow what I said is right
if you don't say I'm right you are under serious threat
that's how intimidation works
It doesn't mean that you are
You could use the threat of violence to force someone to tell a lie
it does mean I am when I control this city, or this province or this country
But that's not what I'm asking
I'm the source of power, everything I said is absolute right
it does lmfao history explains it
what logic you are questioning ?
The inference from having absolute force to determining what is right or wrong
go on
I'm asking for how it follows
All you have really said is that whoever has absolute force has absolute force
nope ? what I'm saying is whoever has the absolute force has the authority power, and authority power dictates what's right and wrong
What is authority power?
the authority power, as the entity of authority that defines the requirement and possible cost of executing an imposition act
What does that mean?
that basically means, if you had more authority power that is more easier and cheaper for you to make people follow your order
and that power comes from and backed by the force
And what exactly does that have to do with determining right and wrong?
for example, what if in a case that people really really hate you that they rather to risk their life to attempt to kill you than follow what you says ?
in that case, your authority power is low asf
I think I proved my point really well
Hail State of Israel and Palestine does not exist
I know you do
š®š±
I think yours is an argument from stipulation
You think that right and wrong are determined by force because you have simply defined it that way
It doesn't really follow from anything
well nope
I explained, it comes from intimidation
people would naturally fear to die
How does intimidation determine right and wrong?
because if you threaten their life they will follow what you says
because they want to live
what do you think if a robber is going to rob your money are you going to either hand over the money or give up your life to the gun that he holds
what would you choose ?
99% of the people would choose hand over the money
the 1% are literally psychos
But how does that determine right from wrong?
because if robber ask you, am I right, dare you to say he's wrong ?
dare you to say it ?
Whether I dare to say it has nothing to do with whether or not it's true
are you going to risk your life to proof that he's wrong with what he's doing
Like I objected earlier, you could force someone to lie at gunpoint
boom, too late, you are dead in that case
Proof and truth are two different things
could they lie if they live under me 100% of their lifetime
does they lie or not matters in that case ?
LOL
it is so simple and it is proven by reality also I demonstrated it pretty well
and that's it
You know that's not true
@thorny steeple Have you read Robert Axelrod?
The Evolution of Cooperation is an important book in game theory
@mystic bay yoooo
I was actually about to ping you right now lol
I was reading about presentism fallacy recently, and I think I'm struggling to understand it. I don't find plenty of sources about it online for some reason.
Just because they are Jewish? Damn.
lol
It says "A Jew has been noticed in this conversation be ready to destroy for the cause of Allah. "
Isn't it just assuming that the values or attitudes of your own time are privileged?
Or are you talking about the metaphysics of time?
what mehga
MakeEnglishHubGayAgain
I think yes. My understanding is that the problem is someone who commits this fallacy isn't aware of historical context that certain actions or views they comment on happened in, this leads to a distorted view of history.
But I wonder, doesn't this block moral critique to historical figures? Because it's often used that way. The particular case I see that in is when Muslims defend Mohamed marrying a kid.
Go back to #šļ½general
you stole my gif
Is that you? @weary belfry
yes, the gif you just sent will be stolen by me
Let's decide who owns the gif. Come to my place for a 1v1 snowball fight. The winner gets the gif. 
It has snowed a lot and it is still snowing.
You changed your profile picture again
Who
Damn, then the war would be over before it even began. We have weather like it's springtime here, there's no snow
Yup, someone drew it for me, did you like it
I want to give my (philosophically unqualified) opinion for this: i dont think it completely blocks moral judgement of historical figures. You can still judge the past with your current moral standard, but we also need to understand why those things happen they way they are. Less of a knee-jerk reaction ig.
The problem with Muslims defending Muhammad is that He is framed as this eternal example for good and that everything he does is moral and just. Does that include marrying a nine-year old? You get my point
Donāt blame him. Heās a Chinese Nationalist.
Chinese American nationalist is more accurate
That makes it okay to insult him?
One example is slavery, i suppose: Washington owned hella slaves. We condemn the act now because it violates the basic human right to be free. But there were so little resistance back then and many defended it because it was common to own slaves for a rich white man in the late 1700s
Mf cant even pick a side
No his nationality is Chinese but heās pro-America š
LETSGOOO FASCISM
"You've met me at a very American moment of my life"
His Israeli nationalism is also just an extension of American nationalism
The equivalent of tattooing Jews
He's troll. By talking to him, you give him attention he wants.
Real
Man if only you quoted the next sentence
āthat's the best for the interest of the United States of Americaā
Joe Biden said almost the same thing btw
No itās not, America works off of national debt
He said he wants to send the money to Israel because itās in Americas best interest, thatās literally his reasoning
Also yes 50 trillion is obviously a joke
Yes but he isnāt a standard MAGA, he likes to pretend heās part of the foreign policy elite
I mean he said himself that he only did this because he 'invests' in US or something.
Heās obviously pro-Israel but 50 trillion is an insanely high number, his point is clear that he thinks the US should give more to Israel, but itās not literal.
Even if it was, his reasoning immediately after that you left out along with other times shows why heās in favor of Israel is because of its usefulness to the US
ššš
The us gdp is 31 trillion usd...
My actual political view is we should send 6282682 quintillion dollars to Hamas
Unequivocally based
This is obviously serious
No
You disagree with him therefore he should have a specific role saying not to take him seriously
Ok Hitler
Lmao
He defends Jews and Israel, you want to tattoo him
To be fair its only israel
I can't speak on this topic due to liberal mods being active in this channel
But i get your point with the whole "marking your political opponent" thing
He does, he believes greater Israel is a God given right to them. Meinkraft is lowkey a Jew
Chinese Jew who's pro-America? What's next? He's secretly russian aswell?
Nah the god stuff is just useful mythology to him
He supports Russia too btw š
I read someone saying Biden wasn't mentioned in the Epstein files. He bombed the middle east just for love of the game.
Bush
Bush and Cheney
I think the only takeaway you should get from this is that he's an attention hungry troll and youre too obsessed with his comically evil political views
...
Everyone who has bombed the Middle East does it for the love of the game.
But Biden has his own separate allegations against him, he didnāt need Epstein to do crimes š
True American patriot š«” /s
Not surprised tbh since his politics is basically might makes right
I don't think even Kissinger was mentioned
He's just a #1 evil guy
Not a child diddler
My goat Bush did it first š¤
"Professionals have standards"
You mean Nobel peace prize winner? He only got it for stopping a war his country started š
The āI disagree with frenzyā role?
Explain to me how the opinions should merit a role. I disagree with almost everything Minecraft has ever said, but a role for dissenting opinions could get out of control quickly
Sure, thatās separate to branding a role for it
First he's troll, giving role just rewards him for his actions.
Second, everyone already disagrees with him, what will role help in this situation?
So you want people to vote on branding someone with a role?
Idk ignore the guy i guess
I think it would be a more logical course of action than a role
Okayyy why donāt we all just kill ourselves instead of caring and not doing anything to help?
Voluntary extinction
Donāt spend all your time thinking about an internet guy, if he bothers you block him and if he says something you donāt like itās your choice whether you want to report him or not, but branding people with a role to tell people not to take them seriously is wild
Do you want live?
Wdym
You ask why don't we kill ourselves. My answer is people prefer living than dying.
What about you?
Well
I don't see how lol but alrighty
We do because we donāt know what happens after we die⦠and we donāt wanna find out
If youāre certain enough to say theyāre a troll then why not ban them.
I believe this is one chance on life.
Better make it worth it.
Thatās true
But donāt you think it would be better if
We all died?


