#đ§ ď˝serious-chat
1 messages ¡ Page 888 of 1
force and control does not coming from morality, but from the force itself that could push people to do things at its course
you can't say I don't have moral because I use guns to point at crowds and force them to do things if that's your definition
but it is what it works simply which I hold the power, I deserve it, and that's my status
i wasn't talking about where force and control comes from, I didn't even begin on that, I said why are you saying they deserve or justified it? That's moral words.
I hold the power not because I'm justified, it's because I hold it
I hold the fucking material like money or gun that represent my power
since I hold it, I'm justified
that's it
._. that's moral word.
then I have to say you are saying bs on this point
Your sentence is breaking basic language.
I'm using very clear logic and explaination in a very easy way
you are trying to confuse it with your moral thing which does not even relevant in this equation
it is out of this totally
No. Not all all, You still haven't told me how does one gain power.
đ¤Ł
.
Eww, sure buddy Whatever you say. If morality is irrelevant stop using moral words.
Stop using justification and deserve
I don't give a fuck about your moral words, some words are obviously neutral and does represent some meaning
And this one isn't.
morality is a totally human made concept that based on one's subjective perspective which how things are justified to go
Smart ass, If you are truly not using morality, Stop using moral words.
that's piece of shit, purely
What's the countdown about?
Again if that is the case, Stop using moral words.
I'm not saying a subjective instance, I'm saying what it goes for now in reality which is total objective
you are trying to use your moral which is irrelevant to confuse with reality
Why did you felt the need to say this line?
nah dude, not gonna work for me
._.
Mashallah, make sure you don't get eaten
You know what? I am going to put your framework in reality, then I will ask questions.
go on
How does one gain power?
If power is absolute how does one get it?
in a struggle, who has the advantage against the other, holds the power
oh that's gore... of my comfort character...
in a survival struggle, who has the deadly force, who has power
._. how does one even begin having advantage over others?
in a money run struggle, who has the most money, who has power
How does one gain money?
How does one gain power? You still haven't answered it in a realistic way.
that was depends on different environment, different cases and instances, you need practical examples
somebody born in a rich family automatically gains power
that's the reality
I see, So why do they "deserve"? Power? Just because they were born in a rich family?
yes because they hold it, they deserve it, that's the basic justification to reality
you can't say it is objective to say one does not deserve it while having it
that's total personal judgement and bs
No. That's again a moral word, And sure where do you come in all of this? Are you rich? Do you have power?
ofc I have power no doubt
you have power to say something in this place
No one deserves anything, Not even happiness or sadness.
somebody got their eye turn blind that can't even know what we are typing right now
No, I meant the supreme power you speak of.
you get warned/muted for this
do you think in a survival struggle it's hard for you to beat him ?
that's the power
Why did you felt the need to type this?
I'm taking a fair example
That was irrevant.
No. That wasn't.
why it wasn't you might explain
Again where is your supreme power? Are you a ruler of some country?
It's a perfect stance relation between the case I mentioned before and this case
I'm not obviously, but I don't have to hold it to hold power ?
who said that you have to be a ruler of the country to hold power
What? That sounds so incoherent btw.
Then which power you have been talking about? You have been saying power is absolute, power is this and that.
no idea, if your level isn't that high to understand it
Why did you felt the need to type that?
because you called it incoherent
and I assume you don't have the capability of understand it
I was talking about the last part.
Sure. You know what? Keep your power fantasy. If you're just going to refuse that justification and deserve are moral words.
it is not fantasy, it is the world you live in and I live in
Why are you going to china
And yet I don't see the supreme power you claim to believe in.
Because I want to leave Europe just for a while
Chongqing, stereotypes are real afterall
Have you been there?
No, I've never been to China
That's great, you're white so they won't be racist towards you
I've heard it's among the toughest language
Yes it is. The Chinese language, for example, has four different variants of the letter âe,â all of which are pronounced differently, making it complicated and demoralizing.
that's wild
we never target muslim as a group that we attempt to wipe them out of our country
we only target terrorists, separatists, and who would violate the law of the PRC
đ¨đł Long Live the People's Republic of China
Who?
i see, thank you sir
Good Morning
Minecraft Glazing chinese Muslims wasn't in my 2026 list
Is 65 and 30 a problematic age difference?
don't wait until you're 65
Say yes or no
It depends on the person
Wdym
FBI HERE
they'd be at different stages of their lives
That's obvious. Let's say they are ok with it. Would u see it as a problematic age difference?
It's cruel if they plan on having children
Let's say no children. They do plan to have a long term relationship
No.
Really shouldn't matter then if it's compatible đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸
Well, I said something similar and got jumped đ
They were like how can u justify 35 year age difference
No need to, it's between the two of them if they're both that age, nothing odd or weird about it unless they plan on having children
Are you disagreeing for disagreements sake
me personally? no, they're consenting adults
Iâm gonna have a lot of little Minecrafts
Just see about it XD
Will you give them white people names?
No.
You people are reacting to it differently than the people in movie server
Some are granted some are not
They need to learn what is discrimination
Donald and Benjamin is probably his 1st two choice
go on
Letterboxd server?
Nope, I'm banned from there. I may have said they were pretentious cinephiles
There's another movie server
It has 85K members
lol i know someone who studies filmmaking who shares the same opinion
Banned for not thinking that Czechoslovakian masterpiece Marketa Lazarova (1967) isn't the greatest movie ever
They might win the most fragile mods in all of cord argument
He better not say that in Letterboxd server
Hello
Sanna 
crying out loud
I thought ts was a joke but I looked it up and it's a real movie đ

Really?
What
Lemme carry you
Idk.
HĂŠlio
Mamdani quoting the Quran is silly but honestly I loved it. Muslim fundamentalists probably were in deep pain listening to that 
Dumbahh
Sure, Come to papa.
Wow
Hi
You don't get it
He wants you to get "a load" of "this" guy
Wtf u guys talked
serious chat being anything but serious
I blame the mods for this.
Would you like to talk about something serious?
not at this moment
but itâs impossible to join any convo since they happen once in a blue moon
General chat usually more serious than this
bad apple lets gooo
illegalize legality
Thatâs look like imu sama
Yo whatâs up, this chat is mega dead.
This is what society does with those who think, shove then off into a box
Far away from the rest of society that would benefit with interaction with someone who is not totally normy brained
oh heyyy unclee nick ur here tooo
damn that was on point
Oh wrong channel
looks delicious tho
We are the downâtrodden, the ones pushed to the outskirts whenever we dare to think out loud.They donât ban us no, that would be too obvious. They relocate us.
They tuck us away in a quiet corner, a digital attic, where the âseriousâ conversations go to gather dust.This is what happens to anyone who refuses to run on autopilot!!!!
Hi
How are you
They call it âorganization.â They call it âkeeping general chat clean.â But we know what it really is:
a soft exile for the people who actually think.
And yet here we are. Still speaking. Still refusing to shrink ourselves to fit the room they gave us.If they wanted silence, they shouldâve picked someone else.
Ranting into the void because this chat is dead af
Why did you felt the need to say all this?
Exactly we scatter across the chats like guerilla philosophers because the main square canât handle too much thinking.
They tuck us away in âserious chatâ like weâre radioactive, but somehow we still end up everywhere.
Apparently we disturb the conversation, we bother them
But when we're arguing is precisely when the chat is most alive
They're always censuring everyone, until you become a robot like those corny people who only talk through gifs
Because exile doesnât demand silence. It demands a voice.
Poetic
And yet, it doesn't make sense for you to rant about it here.
God forbid a person express themselves
why is there a need of that?
If it didnât make sense to you, thatâs exactly why it needed to be said.
What do you even want to hear? Apparently nothing is giving you the answer you want
Contradictory sentence.
I want analysis and I am getting it.
If the rant feels out of place to you, that just means you werenât the audience it was aimed at.
Jesus you're insufferable
It's irrelevant to call yourself thinker.
Why did you call yourself "thinker" it's not a title.
It's a process, You can't call yourself "thinker" that seems fake.
Ok.
I feel like I'm in a woody allen movie
If thatâs all youâve got, youâve already conceded more than you realize.
Youâre right, thinking is a process. Iâm describing what Iâm doing. You, on the other hand, are arguing about labels because you donât want to touch the content.
That's what pretentious logic bros do here all the time
Malish
Anyway, like I was saying before the background noise tried to factâcheck the atmosphereâŚ
this is what happens when you shove the thinkers into the attic. We donât go quiet. We turn the attic into a forum.
They can move us around all they want, but the ideas still spill into every room.
And judging by the nods, Iâm clearly not the only one done pretending the box they put us in is the whole world.
And letâs be real, the only people bothered by this are the ones who never wanted it said in the first place.
Alright rant over
Most people are not very critical and don't like any type of conflict in general
I just think it's unnecessary to end debates on other chats
As if we are disturbing their peace
Calling yourself a âthinkerâ is performative.
But either way, Let's engage in the material if there's any.
Btw you're the one claiming yours "thinker".
That doesn't make any sense
Woahhh
You want to âengage the materialâ?
Great.
Last time we tried that, I asked you a simple question and you vanished.
If harming animals is unnecessary,
why support it?
You never answered then, so answer it now.
A person can't be performative just for calling themselves one thing
When internet ppl discover a new word is a hell on earth bro
who even needs one more pseudo intellectual
Ok.
I am not supporting it.
Why did you assume that? I simply said let them eat meat if they want, Knowing the consequences of their actions, or if they want to eat vegan let them eat vegan.
Iâm not asking anyone to applaud him, but donât write him off either.
Someone whoâs at least signaling they want to think is already halfway out of the fog. Most people never even get that far.
I think he's more into finding contradictions inside people's arguments rather then actually defending a point, but I haven't talk to him much
Saying âlet them eat meat if they wantâ is supporting it. Thatâs the whole point. If you think unnecessary harm is wrong, you donât shrug and say âlet them do it anyway.â
Iâm not assuming anything. Iâm asking you to take a position.
Is unnecessary harm acceptable or not?
You can elaborate if you want tho đ¤ˇ
You're using moral vocabulary.
So you do have a moral standpoint.
Lets see if he takes a position
If that is the case, you're just judging people from a morality.
But either way, my stand is letting people eat meat if they want, or not, their choice.
Hallo
So we should just let people r*pe if that's their choice?
Saying âitâs their choiceâ isnât a moral position. Itâs a way of avoiding one. Weâre talking about unnecessary harm. Either you think itâs acceptable or you donât.
Letting people do something harmful while claiming youâre neutral is still supporting the harm.
So Iâll ask again. Is unnecessary harm acceptable or not?
Seems like moral relativism
Hello there, welcome to our den of inquiry
Wow, Wild assumptions, I only putted letting eat meat, why did you assumed that it was my whole stand?
We are asking if Unnecessary harm is acceptable
It isn't acceptable right?
@sonic lion you are giving him space to dodge my questions, please be mindful
Why would you come to this conclusion?
I know, but it has to be wild to point the implication of your argument
Ok I'm gonna kick out lol
Hello there, welcome to our den of inquiry
You are saying unnecesarry

Yes I am
So
Again your point is moral when you claimed it wasn't from a moral standpoint.
And
Define unnecessary harm? According to which metric?
There're many metric, first is nutrition/survival, second taste/pleasure
Third culture and traditions
Fourth alternatives.
So you just wanted the dramatic effect knowing damn well that's not what I meant.
Youâre listing metrics, which is good that means youâre actually engaging.
So letâs use your own list.
If nutrition and survival are covered by plantâbased options, then killing animals for taste, pleasure, or tradition falls under unnecessary harm.
Thatâs all Iâm saying.
You donât have to agree, but you canât pretend the categories donât lead there.
So if I were to tell you, you were engaging in unnecessary harm would it be good of you to continue to do so?
No
yeah basically lol
Why do they fall under unnecessary harm?
so may I ask if you have considered the animals which get killed unnecessarily for you to eat?
I am understanding wrong something?
Because by your own metrics, nutrition and survival can be met without harming animals. Once survival is covered, the remaining reasons you listed
taste, pleasure, culture, tradition
are not survival needs.
Thatâs why they fall under unnecessary harm.
If a harm isnât required for survival or health, then itâs unnecessary by definition.
Oh It is vegan thing I tought you are talking about monetary
Like financial damage
Yes we are discussing veganism, and the harm we do to sentient feeling animals for unnecessary reasons
Why not?
If we ignore culture, taste, and tradition completely, then weâre only talking about survival and alternatives. But real world decisions rarely operate in that vacuum.
It isn't important for me I don't care
Realâworld decisions absolutely involve culture and taste. Iâm not denying that. But those things donât turn a nonâsurvival harm into a survivalânecessary one.
If a harm isnât required for health or survival, then itâs unnecessary by definition. Culture and taste explain why people do it, not whether the harm is necessary.
You said it wouldnât be good of you to continue to do harm when you found out it was unnecessary.
I'm out.
Why? You canât even stand on your own position you took
You're operating from moral absolutism.
Understood. I donât operate in a framework that ignores context, so Iâll leave it there.
I tought you are talking about financial thing
Itâs not moral absolutism to say survival needs and cultural preferences arenât the same category.
Thatâs just basic reasoning.
Youâre free to step out if you want, but donât pretend I ignored context. I used the exact framework you laid out.
Isn't it a net positive if we eat and hunt invasive species
And even make other products out of them, I've seen Australians make pots out of cat remains
Managing invasive species is a separate issue from eating animals for taste or tradition. Ecologists focus on reducing ecological damage, not turning it into a justification for harming animals in general.
And extreme examples people bring up online donât really help the discussion.
The core question is still the same: when harm isnât required for survival or health, how do we justify it?
Irrelevant to the conversation we are having, but I feel sorry for him.
Sorry, I didn't realizs the convo hasn't ended.
What are you guys talking about?
Phones, books, and art donât require harming sentient beings. Thatâs the difference.
âUnnecessaryâ doesnât mean âanything beyond survival is forbidden.â It means: if something requires harming someone, and you donât need that harm for survival or health, then the harm is unnecessary.
Enjoying art doesnât require killing anyone. Eating meat does.
Indirect systemic harm isnât the same as directly harming a sentient being when you donât need to. I canât live in a modern society without participating in some indirect harm nobody can.
But I can choose not to cause direct, unnecessary harm when alternatives exist.
Thatâs the difference.
@slender coral bro the fuck is that pfp
This aint the bro I know
@thorny steeple yo frenzy
Nobody can avoid all harm thatâs not the standard. The ethical line is simple: avoid the harms you can avoid.
I canât avoid every indirect impact of modern society, but I can avoid directly killing animals for taste.
Telling me to live in the woods is just admitting you donât have a justification for the harm you choose.
Its not hard to understand
I'm good pretty good wbu
Pointing out the difference between avoidable and unavoidable harm isnât extremism itâs basic ethics.
And calling me a hypocrite doesnât answer the argument.
You say youâre proâveganism, but youâre defending unnecessary harm as a âchoice.â
Thatâs not neutrality. Thatâs a moral stance.
Just own it.
Thereâs no false dichotomy. I never said âavoid all harm or itâs over.â I said: avoid the harms you can avoid.
Harmâreduction is exactly what Iâm doing, reducing the avoidable, direct harm of killing animals for taste.
And yes: if a harm isnât required for survival or health, then itâs unnecessary. Thatâs the ethical point Iâm defending.
You seem to not be understanding at all
Cool
Some Muslim fundamentalist on Twitter said that a woman who puts perfume and doesn't dress modestly is harassing men, a Muslim girl responded with this art.
Her perfume is assaulting the guy.
I take back my statement
Peak pfp
Vov
I love when art is used for progressive messages.
Traditional Muslims often hate art. They prohibit music, drawing, sculpting, and sometimes despise poetry.
warning for everyone I donât accept any Real Madrid fan in chill chat know your place
why
Go say that in chill chat đ
I did Iâm just warning every Madrid fan
hey im not
Ok I thought
Do people become vegan just to argue
im for barcelona
It's not justifiable, but if harming them improves the situation to the native species then I don't see why it shouldn't be encouraged, especially in places such as Australia where telling invasive species such as rabbits or even feral cows from native ones like potoroos or wombats is extremely easy
Always a dehydrated piss colored username btw
only thing that comes to mind from your color is Russia
Stop objectifying a woman, it's disgusting
Atrocities on women will unite hindus and muslims
Even me?
ngl i got da dark humor
Don't you remember we already discussed it
Whatâs this?
Ok I accept u as an immigrant
Never mind,I don't want to be near barca fans
Humour is subjective
Tumor is permanent
Which is in Uranus
Barca fans every year:This is our year the UCL will be ours.
Real Madrid should have a plan to how win against Barcelona
In comment section users who appear to be Hindus based on username are glorifying punishment for drinking alcohol and having intimacy
Ana mabarif arabi
WellâŚ.
Pak Defence Minister Trolls Own Country In Parliament | Admits Pakâs US âMiscalculationâ
'US Used Pakistan Then Threw Away Like Toilet Paper': Khawaja Asif's Big AdmissionKhawaja Asif said the costs of realigning with the US after 1999, particularly following the September 11, 2001, attacks, were devastating.
Watch!
Mint is an Indian fi...
Itâs Hamas leader saying âisreal will be free with the help of Allah â then the other man corrected for him said âPalestine not isreal â
Ik what exactly he meant by "israel will be free"
Assalamu allaikum
What?
Sholom
Am new to this server
Whatâs that mean
Hi
Welcome to the gang, I hope you make good bonds here while improving English
Alr
Free Israel from the idea of existing in reality
Fr
Nah
I donât believe Hamas
God help u get what you want đ
Unless it's K*rdistan
Am arab btw
Iâm Kurdish
Mashaallah, kefak ya akh
Get well soon
Martiniii is ex israeli, he lives in Bulgaria now
Meen byefhamni
Var var var var var var var
How can i see my grade
Dedee
Also directly, in order to get it for a cheap price it uses child labor and often slavery in the Congo and sweatshop labor. Not to mention the environmental impact of the electricity it needs or the production process.
Killing an animal and eating it is much less bad than owning a phone in terms of environmental and human impact.
Whereas if I went and bought beef it would be made by some well paid (compared to the slave/child/sweatshop worker) guy in Texas, and while there would be an environmental impact itâs certainly not worse than making a phone.
wtf
How's it in Bulgaria
Well the year is 900 and Iâm preparing to bring my pack of horses to go sack Constantinople but idk if itâll work
The First Bulgarian Empire was a medieval state that existed in Southeastern Europe between the 7th and 11th centuries AD. It was founded in 680â681 after a group of Bulgars, led by Asparuh, moved south to the northeastern Balkans, and secured Byzantine recognition and their right to settle south of the Danube by defeating â possibly with th...
OHHH
How did u time travel
It's easy
I saw some bulgar wheat
Go to bed
Are you having ur first schizophrenia episode?
Yes heâs a native Turk so he thinks itâs Istanbul
Constantinopole is on an incline
Iâm joking
Bluechew is working they say
No you're not
Incle
Incans
Indonesian
Incel
Ooh, i misspelt it
This chat is predominantly Madrid fans.You should go back to chill chat
Infosys
Out cell
Are you dad?
Are you unable to tell? What a joke
Who's the lucky one
Lucky how
Shut up and answer me
Your mom
Great lady she is
Hi
No she has issues
Uh.. sure ig
I need someone help urgently
@omar
You don't have choice
How can we help you
I do
What's that
Leaving your mom
Anyone knows about under world in Mesopotamia 

My freind she was angry on me cause my bad connection she thinks that was my fault she blocked me just left her masseges for me
What about over world
Can't help you, I ain't relationship therapist
Under world
Nope
Like under earth
No i just want
@ripe remnant
Make sure to toss the guide voodoo doll in and youâll be able to defeat the wall of flesh
Knows as the âdead world â
Get yourself better connection
I have but iwas not in home
You should help me if your feminist
According to the legends such as the Epic of Gilgamesh and Inanna's Descent to the Underworld. Itâs a place when someone die they believed that their souls were going to there
đ that's new kind of extortion but whatever. Best thing you can do is to apologise but since she blocked you, you can't really do it
You can solve it just in one minute just tell her about me
Inanna was the God of beauty justice and political power
@fallow shard
Quite the mix
I'm not ur pigeon
But your are human
Subhuman
I'm not ur mailman
What wrong if you will solve this just in one minute
Don't waste your time king, move on
Don't be Martiniii
I know
How possibly I could help, I'm not sending messages to randoms
Basically they had God for everything for example âAnâ was the God of the sky
âEreshkigalâwas the God of dead world
She is not random
Yeah just weird for beauty to also include political power lmao
She will be ofline
Anunnakis đ
Make new account and apologise
Simplest solution, she'd appreciate it more
Yes An anunnakis
Shut up
Anubis
I always not a feminist just because of this stupiditi
Making no sense
Do u know what else they were believed that whoever have a lot of kids they were living a good and great life after they died
Just debating stupid
Be respectful to my white friends, you can be disrespectful to k*rds
Sounds a lot like Christians lol

it was because their children would make sacrifices to the gods, and this would lead to the well being and comfort of the deceased person in the underworld.
And the kings would dedicate their own daughters to the temples to serve the gods.
did u infect my reels
Nope
I am not a simp like this
why are u still up at 3am
Because i am waiting you to send me messages
Oh weird
Helloe
Bonsoir
What's going on in here
Supporting child labour
signing this petition FOR child labour
Lowkey needs to make a comeback
Nowadays they just watch tiktok or they become gay
Gimme the details
It's not that complicated
We support children working
The moment the mines closed it became tiktok, 67, asexuality (Code for I can't find a bf/gf)
Thats kinda true
Children should work with moral people who works in industry
Even if its 2-3 months in a year
It's impossible here because of woke liberals, even the basic jobs for kids like delivering mail, babysitting, lawn mowing are more or less gone
They want them to study because "education leads to jobs" (We have 10% youth unemployment rate)
We always work if we dont the government will forces us
Or they will not send money to us
Maybe in ur country its different
where u from?
It is, if you're unemployed here the government pays welfare
Anarchism is the solution
Define anarchism
Abolish government something something.
Definition (noun): a political theory favoring the abolition of governments
I guess Oli would like that as someone living in a country with high HDI.
I will just live on a cruise ship
hopefully it will have a fallout bunker
And hot chicks
Government should make a land for a free for all where there's no law.
I'm not unemployed I don't rp as an anarchist
I'll make you my slave-femboy
Never met an employed anarchist
There are such lands
Every government has to provide a place for outlaws
That's another way to control information
And people
worse thing ever
There's a semiautonomous community like that in Denmark
Freetown Christiania, it's mostly druggies though
đđđ
Lowkey true though
They all settle in Sweden and Finland instead
How are things in Sudan?
i am in save place
thanks for asking
so you living in sweden
@high raven europe is my dream you gotta be grateful girl
Glad to hear that, I live in Norway, and yes it's a privilege
that's popular football player is from your country
so what is your major i am law students unfortunately
i really have to sleep local time here is 12 pm
goodbye guys
seeya
Live in germany
nice ig
Why asking lol
just to see the country, nothing else
Where u from
Hlo guysss
Howâs its going to day?
I have a daily routine in every single day, in my country local time is 6 am and this morning i feel so bored
Hey man me tio itâs similar
207K likes, 6661 comments. âMarch 7th Organizer: @i heart 21 savage ProjectSaveAmerica: @Nicole Global Strike Spread The Word !â
i thght thid was the uk for a sec omh
Globally
why does everyone says this
about asexuality
everyone is desperate nowadays not hard at all to get laid
Itâs not hard but it is hard to find someone who isnât obnoxious ngl
Cause itâs a bit hard to fathom I think
(Aka I donât understand it)
Exactly
Really?
It's not very hard to get it
Just ppl who don't feel sexual attraction
Yeah ik I just donât get how you donât lol
Just picture someone you don't find attractive
To ace people, everyone is that person
Not that strict but anyway
U get the idea
Yeah I get it
But I hear this all the time yk that ace people "can't get laid"
Men who can't get laid call themselves incels and go around murdering women
Yeah idk, I knew one ace person and they could never really articulate why they just got repulsed by the idea
Lmao for realđ
It's either repulsed or apathy
Its hard to articulate i guess
Yeah idk, I guess idk much about anything else because Iâm in a very conservative environment, so idk either đ like I can theoretically grasp and support things like rights and stuff but I can never understand any of these things beyond the definition lol
Hello Sir, How are you?
Thats because you don't feel it, it's totally fine
I'm doing fine I guess, not much going on
I´m glad too hear that!
what's up with you
I´m doing well thanks for asking. (I woke up 30 mins ago) đ
it's 6pm for me lol
for me its 1:38 am
why did you wake up
Because I went to bed at 5 pm
that's early
yes
Whatâs the countdown in your name for
Days until denial becomes a collaborator in the Chinese occupation of Minnesota (can be stopped if you rap)
of Austria
I´m spying for the chinese goverment
W
Hi
BREAD đ
Anyone to practice?
Yes, is my second day in this platform. I want to learn how to works.
If I rap can I arrange a deal where I can buy Minnesota and make it a new Somali region
Not with me but with china sure

@sonic lion
Is this sarcasm?
Bro you read the whole chat or something
How r u doing guys
I don't think so
Why do you think anarcho capitalism makes sense
As far as I know anarcho-capitalism is the only anarchist model that could realistically work in a large, complex society, because markets and private property actually scale, unlike the others. I don't see how you could have an economy in the others if you now wanted anarchy
It's at least feasible on paper
People who doesn't vote because they think all candidates are incompetent shouldn't be shamed
Oh my
I would argue itâs not even true anarchy to begin with, as anarchism is typically about dismantling hierarchy, whereas capitalism is very hierarchical. Without any government intervention in markets, the worst abuses we see of private corporations would only grow exponentially in both frequency and severity, as they only have to care about profit motive.
I think when compared to communities that rely on more communal living structures I would take the communal structure every time.
People who wish every candidate should just die because they are nothing but corrupt scroundrels shouldn't be shamed.
What do your name mean
ashura
does it mean demon?
That's my point, it's the only practical one out of the bunch, how would you scale communal systems?
I don't see how the others could sustain a modern economy, unless the point is to not have one
Yeah the point is sort of that consumerism is bad because of the environmental impact when we have finite resources. Itâs a more conservationist approach, and making worker satisfaction and worker control more important than efficiency.
At least in socialist/communist circles, Anarchist circles I assume are similar
Yes
Death is easy..we can come up with worse punishment
how most view anarchism more often than not is a caricature of it
How? How would it hypothetically produce a strong economy without markets or incentives?
All of those could work in small communities, I don't see one that could scale in a society like anarcho-capitalism
Hello
This isn't the place to say hello. People come here to show their intellectual superiority or just plain dumbshit
Tbh it's either this or venting about religion
Hello!

Religion is responsible for 80% of this chat probably..it's the oxygen of this chat

True Muslims will fast. Those who don't observe fasting without any valid reason aren't Muslims. I'm gonna fast and I'm not even religious đ
I belong to the group who's fasting because of peer pressure
We fast too, it starts a few days after Ramadan this year
Lent?
It's so nice to see people are going out to vote with enthusiasm in my country. At the same time low-key worried they might vote for the ultra conservative đ
Is it lent
If youâre menstruating you donât fast but you have to make it up after you finish
No
17-18
Not necessarily after Ramadan
No, it means you make up the day that you missed fasting
I need to add it to my calendar so I can start watching the new shows on MBC
After you finish menstruation
The most fucked up shows oat
I want to see what Cambodian Muslims are gonna be making for Iftar
Nowadays yes
Back in my days it was a new season of bab el hara
You fast for equal amount of days
Um zaki died a few weeks ago
It's over
saw you in serious chat, i have seen enough
Hm
Absolute classic
That sucks, abu jawdat died a few years back too
nothing, it was just a bad joke, don't mind it.
in a relationship, some other ships that exists but are not considered as married.
We can categorize it in "others"
What's unknown
Must be agnostic, they never know shi
ig even they don't know relationship they are in, they sure are thoughtfull
frfr
Sounds like E daters of English hub

Still it won't be "unknown"
@#đ§ ď˝serious-chat we all low-key gay
"I wish I were like a butterfly, living only for a season knowing only the flowers, far from the bitterness of this world."
Leiwands Kino Oida
Who is we
been almost 2 months
Selling drugs
well i'm not gonna waste my time dating around without any goal
no, my fiance is of the same religion as me
đđť
i threw up
Can you invite me to your wedding, I haven't been to an Asian one
I've only been to white people wedding, lesbian, Aramean and Muslim weddings
Mandean too actually
lesbian 
i like how it was casually mentioned in there
1997, it's when Ellen Degeneres came out
He's 16 that's before his time
Spoiler alert : it'll be a Muslim wedding
Congrats sister
May Allah grant you success in your life and May your children be non chopped inshallah
Praying extra hard on that my children wonât be chopped part
Iâve been saying it for like months đđ
.
I also thought you were joking
Invite me to the wedding bro I'll bring dogs for the bbq
I remember you said you're half Chinese
@shell hemlock assalamualaikum warehmatullahi wabarakatuhu
live free or die what?
BrBa S5
dont kill me with your cryptic lines
what are you bringing for the hot pot
im out
Waalaikumsalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
Whaddup whaddup
what's the correlation
Hi there
d_s_6_
This is what I hate about Russian stupid b. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSH6m6pjCzQ/?igsh=dnByazhwN2Q4MTA0 They were trying to make a trending video. A police officer came up to them and forbid I'm do that. Another police officer approached him and told him not to bother people. The girl had tears in her eyes. How boring must your life be, if such nonsense makes you cry. And also, stupid teenagers. I don't say police was right or something. what happens it just one second situation of misunderstanding that figured well.
ĐĄŃŃаŃнО Ни вŃкНадŃваŃŃ? ĐŃонŃ. ТŃŃŃŃŃŃŃ ŃŃки. ĐадО Ни ŃŃĐž доНаŃŃ? мС. ĐĐž Ń Ń ĐžŃŃ ĐżĐžĐşĐ°ĐˇĐ°ŃŃ ŃŃĐž видоО. Đа ĐşŃаŃнОК пНОŃади йОНŃŃĐľ но ĐżŃŃгаоП. (нО никŃĐž наП Ńак и но ОйŃŃŃниН пОŃĐľĐźŃ ĐĐĐĐŹĐĐŻ ŃŃОгО доНа...
147294
Lmao yes stupid b, you going to jail for jumping on red square
you don't need a modern economy to control everyone in your territory
@pseudo flume are u following the election 
all you need is shoot few rounds on the sky and execute all dissents
and you enjoy where you rule
I donât know when it is Ai, tbh
https://youtube.com/shorts/lsZZt-i0Qhg?feature=shared
that is even wild
Moloch, Molech, or Molek is a word which appears in the Hebrew Bible several times, primarily in the Book of Leviticus. The Greek Septuagint translates many of these instances as "their king", but maintains the word or name Moloch in others, including one additional time in the Book of Amos where the Hebrew text does not attest the name. The Bi...
are yall talking about the epstien files
sacrifice kids for god i thoughts that only appears in movie
but it is so crazy that actually existed that shit in human history
not god but for demons probably
humans practicing religions often is crazy
i dont think so no
genocide is attribued to humans, not a divinity
what religion are you talking about here
killed is also lawful taking life of someone
islam or christianity
God creates life, he has right to take your life also
a dad doesnt creates life
its more of humans free will and how they do crazy shit but you cant put the stick on god imo
a dad 'works' in the creation by uniting the sperm with the egg, tho he isnt the one creating
they love doing that
no, they united, not created
women eggs are made in the grandma, so is the grandma my mom?
it is just how life begin
no
parents doesnt creates, they unite its all u have to understand
you cant compare humans with god dude
real
we are created to die
the bad shit that happens for example zinoists killing children is human free will
when they eventually die
plus
theyre going to have to answer for their consequences
what is happening rn is why what God did in OT was good
Can you explain the holy trinity
like u can think whatever u want deffo, but when u eventually die (since no ones immortal)
ur gunna regret what u thought off
however they ask 'if God exist, why he doesnt do anything to stop wars?' but if God choose to act they'll call him a monster
3 hypostasis in 1 essence
is a man wrong to destroy his robot he made?
Robot is not a human
robot isnt a lfie tho
ok so im not wrong to torture animals, they arent human
u dont understand my logic, it is the point
What differentiates the three if they're all of the same identical essence
principles, monarchy of the Father also, one beget, one is begotten, one is proceeded
lol, it was ironic
it was very obvious bruh, he said 'they arent human' to me asking if it is wrong to destroy a robot i just made, dogs arent human, am i wrong to torture them then?
That's just in relation though
they are different by their relations as they have princples that differ
tbh im lazy to debate
0 difference, it's just about wanting your hands to be clean
so if you want to learn trinity read St.Augustine
Yes but if the differences are only in their relations, begetting or proceeding, does that mean they are not really distinct in themselves?
I'm not debating
its relative
i meant talking, or wtv
i just joined cause putting genocide term on a divine judgement is a fallacy
on what
its a term attribued to humans
yall still going at it dang
you dont say lions do a genocide if they kill a whole group
respect
do yk what genocide is also?
A real orthodox would say "It was worth it"
it was lwk
massacre isnt a genocide
my source? UN
genocide is a new term also
was made between 1945-1948 by the UN to clarify what was the holocaust
to put a class on the Shoah
send all the A
All Biblical genocides were justified and worth it
Why would it be wrong of a God to commit genocide against people who are wicked?
Standard practice
fr
as if death is also an end
'God is all good' is a stupid term
?
God is omniscient, he would know the consequences of every action. If he now did kill children, it would be because he know how they would grow up
we should fear him also
You're claiming that God made a mistake by killing the children
real
What
it reminds me a question
'would u go back in time, and kill hitler while he is a kid'
nope
If God knows what humanity is capable, shouldn't he just make us extinct bcs we're quite literally worst species
No it doesn't
'stopping' the freewill doesnt contradict it's principles
Ohh
Godâs foreknowledge doesnât negate free will, he can know what choices people will make without forcing them. If he judged children because of what they would freely choose as they grew up, that preserves human freedom while maintaining divine justice
So if he killed children, it was Biblically lore accurate and justified
Aigh can we do what he doesnt know? Nope
What difference would it make if he knew the outcome?
Its pointless then why testing us
What
Bro forgot he has a cross next to his name
Because he's omniscient and would know who would end up being wicked
Yeah that's literally how it works
His knowledge of a future event doesn't remove human responsibility or moral accountability
Wym special treatment
Even the innocents were struck
They were all gooked
Why would he though
To you yes
How do you know it doesn't all fit into the plans of an omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent being
Just for you or him? Because according to the bible God's plans are inherently just because he's perfectly holy and morally perfect
He could do anything but chooses to let humanity to destroy itself, what is so hard to understand
God's and your sense of justice may not be the same.
You're confusing God being rational with what's logical to humans
I think most do, because what you said is a category error fallacy
Insufficient in design compared to Gods yes
No, the confusing finite human logic with infinite divine reasoning part
Imagine a world where thereâs good all the time and no wrong or right
Sadly human logic is flawed.
It even cannot evaluate the truth value of the statement "this sentence is false".
Plus you try to disprove unfalsifiable claim. It's impossible, man.
Heaven?
Are you gonna fast for ramadan bro
On this earth
Well⌠yeah
Marshmallow
I don't see why it cannot happen on earth tho.
I donât think humans would be humans if we didnât have any flaws
Sort of
im not a christian nor do i hate them so im not gonna get involved in this one
Finite humans can reason, observe and learn, which they do, since they study bible/quran/torah/whatever to explore truths so no I don't think it's foolish to discuss something you understand only a little of, kindof like how we discuss evolution in science class but ignore abiogenesis
That's true.
And Congratulations on your wedding, sis
you guys enjoy
I think I get why they don't discuss their religion with you
Then why would religions push for science and invent the scientific framework
I don't think Science was created because of religion. It's created because people want to prove that they're right.
Doesn't matter, they invented the scientific framework to understand God's creation, look at Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Mendel
Not true, the scientific method was heavily influenced by religious thought
"Observation>Hypothesis>Reason" is literally a Christian assumption
My point is you wouldn't have it without religion
Is it tho because this is independent scientific discoveries in China in that era too.
From the article:
"Ideas regarding nature that were theorized during classical antiquity were not limited to science but included myths as well as religion. Those who are now considered as the first scientists may have thought of themselves as natural philosophers, as practitioners of a skilled profession (e.g., physicians), or as followers of a religious tradition (e.g., temple healers)."
Not the same, the scientific framework requires a scientific method, which the Christians pushed for because they assumed that they lived in a rational, law-governed creation where everything that could be observed had a reason
I never said science
I said the scientific framework and the scientific method, shitpost inquiries made by Greeks don't count
They believed in a geocentric universe, the four humors theory, the spontaneous generation theory, the elements theory, all of which Abrahamic religions systematically proved wrong
Both
Why? It makes perfect sense
They assumed that everything observable had a cause and a reason because their omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent God made it
None progressed as much as Abrahamic religions though
It is if we're discussing methodology
"I believe in homunculus, I haven't observed it and systematically tested it but it's not pseudoscience"
For the worse yes, and if not then it would take many many more years because it would lack a fundamental, critical thing
They'd end up just like the current ones, based on Abrahamic reasoning
Wym maybe
Basic science is "This can be observed therefore it must have a cause and an effect"
these type of people does not represent ICE
ICE is friendly, responsible, and it is with the glory of contributing the great country of the United States of America
I don't, if everything is pointless why try to explain it
people should be proud of their ICE officer, not these asshs who would try to block an emergency vehicle
đşđ¸
Which election?
The one u commented about
Huh, so you have faith in something?
Ooh, I'm not closely monitoring it, I did came across some reels
It was about the extremist party
It's 96 to 32 so far
?def believer
Definition 1 (noun): a person who has religious faith
Definition 2 (noun): a supporter who accepts something as true
Epic logical jump
wrong it's the song by imagine dragons
Well well well
32 for taliban?
Yes, their coalition. Not just em
Isn't it concerning, i told you about it, but blud said they're irrelevant
Your country will get shagged by radical muslims
My armpit is itchy
Leader of taliban party said something like "working women are equivalent to prostitutes"
And many young people support his ideas
Your country is already getting snagged by radical Hindus
Atleast our people are educated enough to not fall for their religious propaganda so far.
Out of 32, many were won by the party of students
Ooh nevermind, you're brain dead nationalist 
I was cretesizing your country, I also cretesize my country
But blud is smoking my country insted of understanding the issues
I'm a nationalist who has never voted 
Dude it's really easy to brainwash a Muslim
Wtf, lmao
You're just being stupid who doesn't understand bengali people at all
There is a huge number of people who didn't vote today (awami league supporters)
If their party was eligible and they went to vote. Jamaat wouldn't even get 30 seats
Religion politics might work in india. It never worked well in bd
stupid name
Can't relate
Man says shi like
modern environments (like co-educational schools) could lead to "moral degradation" for women
Anyway I'm lowkey greatful to not live in a Muslim majority country, alhamdulillah
Yours?
There's a belief, if u vote for someone and he does corruption and other bad shit. You'll be held accountable for their sins too

U live in something far worse
Sure buddy
What rhe
Wdym
my name is alpha woman coded
Me
Why would u be held accountable, bruhh
Definitely u
Eat a duck
browns together strong
U misspelled apes
Not em all
whats adonai
She seems smart
Umm isn't she the same person who ignored those r4pe cases basically and said girls shouldn't go out at night
She is, in our region it's rare to have educated leaders
She got multiple degrees
It was a longer clip she said it's not safe for girls (which is lowkey true)
Anyway, she should have made better laws n shi
It's good to have one every other century
It is but yk it's not true for every region . I mean u can be cautious and still go out plus she should educate the young ones how to behave also the grown ass men
Yes, you're right
