#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 864 of 1
It's either 1.5 or 2nd
govt and police both r fked up in India
Yes, tax players are getting scammed by the system lol
and im talking about your data u shared 2023-2024
West consider it as a developing country which is synonym for 3rd world, but i suspect your country is a falling country 
that's why i will try my best to leave india
š
Ig it's part of economic cycle
Your country is still among the most powerful nations, being part of security council of UN is pretty lit
let's see what's gonna happen with the recent india-eu trade
Who cares about the UN tho
And who cares about Russia in UN
Please don't, india is the best country ever, you should not leave it
Do you plan on going to Canada or Germany?
Do not redeem the card
That's racist
Bhutan it's peace there
š
Wow, curve ball
Why? They're very popular picks for Indians
Entire world does
Tibetan monastery is the only way
my relatives lives in germany, canada , USA & japan
Because the entire world depends on our energy sources?
are u ruski?
Yes
I got relatives only in UK and middle east, how muslim of me (I'm Atheist)
I got only in Germany and South Korea
Because you guys can change big UN resolutions
It's literally my cousin š
The hypocrites from Europe are in charge so I don't believe it
Ruski š„
Ukraine isn't the part of security council
Good countries to live in! There's a small diaspora of Indians in Sweden, an even smaller one here in Norway
The majority work in engineering
I'm talking about Germany, the UK and Belgium
hell nah not sweden
They say that Russia is a threat to Greenland while the actual threat is the US
It's not that cold if that's what you're thinking
And now they call China to invest in Europe
He is worried about @fresh flower
If anything, "cold" should be attractive to Indians. You can put on more clothes at -10°C, you can't take off more clothes at 40°C

Also they eat fish pickles in Nordic countries
@high rapids is the most European of all Europeans here
I wonder if he's still nationalist
Always been
@midnight badge your Spotify name is hilarious
Im thinking abt my 60s. I would rather live in peace. I already have acres of land in the moutains
predator? i don't even remember
Yes
See! That's the problem with people like you.
You cry foul for everything that the current Govt. of India does.
You cry when they're pressured to leave India - You cry whenever they're deported (Human rights are cited in these cases).
You cry when the central govt. takes charge and orders the state govt. of West Bengal with direction to provide assistance for Border Fencing for BSF. - You would CRY foul if the central govt. declare President's Rule in the state of West Bengal for making sure the Border Fencing by BSF is concluded (High risk of National Security)(The current Government of West Bengal is dependent on the Muslim Vote Bank and they can't piss off a certain community which leads to a lot of infiltration).
Please do it before leaving the country
Other challenges:
Complex Nationality Verification: A major, long-term challenge is establishing the nationality of suspects, as many enter without documents. Deportation requires a "green signal" from Bangladesh, a process that can take months.
Reluctance in Cooperation: Indian officials have noted that, at times, Bangladeshi authorities have been reluctant to accept that the suspected individuals are their citizens, sometimes even declaring deported individuals to be Indian citizens, resulting in legal disputes.
Legal and Judicial Hurdles: The deportation process is a long-drawn legal procedure under the Foreigners Act, 1946. Many immigrants challenge their detention in Indian high courts, and the Gauhati High Court has previously ordered the release of those held for over two years in detention centers.
Border Geography and Security Gaps: The 4,096 km border includes difficult, unfenced riverine sections and dense jungles that are challenging to man round-the-clock, aiding illegal, clandestine entry.
Document Forgery and Identification Issues: The widespread use of forged documents (Aadhaar cards, voter IDs) makes it difficult to distinguish between illegal immigrants and Indian citizens. Furthermore, Bengali-speaking populations in border states share similar dialects, leading to challenges in distinguishing Indian Bengalis from Bangladeshi Bengalis.
Lack of Formal Extradition Treaty: India and Bangladesh do not have a formal extradition or specific deportation treaty with detailed, streamlined guidelines for large-scale repatriation of undocumented migrants.
Long-Term Residence and Integration: Many alleged illegal immigrants have been living in India for generations, making their deportation legally and socially complex.
i will do plastic surgery & voice surgery before leaving india
After you're done reading this, try not to be the keyboard warrior/activist that you're and go through the challenges the Govt. of India faces in the due process and how the legal complexity is created furthermore when various political parties such as INC,AIMIM (to save the vote bank) and a few more Islamic societies (Jamiat Ulama E Hind, Association for Protection of Civil Rights - famous for funding legal aid for anti social elements) come in file affidavits and implead to be party in such cases which further delays the entire legal process.
I know it's difficult for you to understand the current political scenario of India as you need to come out of your echo chamber.
š
I shouldn't have said that
Jai shri chatgpt
So my crying is enough to stop goverment from enforcing law and order?
I prefer being called Mormon
Indian politics in serious chat was the LAST thing I wanted to see
My new wallpaper
the prblm is that there are many illegal torkish blood in India but the rate of deportation is very low. the govt should enforce the law more strictly and stop listening to human rights. They should a create proper big ass detention facility and throw them into it
If it's this hard to verify someone is bangladeshi, how do you know if someone is from Bangladesh?? Can you please provide a goverment data about it, or it's all based on anecdotal evidence?
How do you know it's many
That's around 1.1% of India
that 1% makes a lot of difference
especially in India
I was wondering which sources did Mr Jaiswal and Rijiju cited
who knows but that's all we know
source: trust me bro
this is so old ass joke. pls come up with smth new
i will as soon as you come up with their sources š
That figure was never backed by census data
even the Home Ministry admits that thereās no accurate count of illegal Bangladeshis in india Itās an estimate
go read wat i wrote
also i wasn't joking
Political guy says thing, fails to cite anything
that's what i said before
i dunno these stupid ppl lol they think they really smart ass
Who 
Me is smart jew
Shabbat shalom
anti & martini
you're one to talk, you've yet to prove that you're not
lol
read the whole chat dumbo
Damn, Iām sorry I wonāt question the government when no data is provided. Long live the government!
Lmao
i did dumbo, you couldn't even link that article that you were quoting lol
I donāt really buy into nationalism in general
keep ur eyes open
will be good for u
Yeah, you realize that means youāre just uncritically accepting a source
š keep up kiddo
One day I hope your education system improves so a more intelligent conversation could be had.
rn't u the one who isn't able to comprehend what i wrote before? Don't be over confidence
I suspect it's not a satisfactory source
India minister Jaiswal taken to court over 'sexist' remark - BBC News https://share.google/dKR9VtPcbQMRvUGiG
Youāre unable to comprehend that your worldview is reliant on something you canāt even verify lmao
The other guy was accused of 45,000 Million rupees scam
Tbf scammers see like a reliable source right?
An establishment or organisation would have been more satisfactory, quoting someone's words aren't a great source
Using the word more is quite generous, taking any politician at their word is about the same as thinking Trump is honest
Most politicians are scammers, even in your country 
99% of all politicians and 100% of American politicians ngl
Leave zoru alone
tbh no one really cares about all these things. Itās common across all political parties.
as i said before we can just go with the numbers since we donāt have any official deportation data and no government share the data or any kind of source.
and honestly getting an adhar card in India is easy.you just need to pay around ā¹5000. Thatās how fked up the system is.
Even the America can't show you the actual data of illegal mexicans. No country will show you the actual data
No heās betraying Palestine
So because thereās no data, you default to believing a politician saying something with no proof?
Damn. This is why general chat dead.
Take me
š I said you need to go with the data of the government not your own random numbers
No we can't just go with the numbers cited by politicians
Q. 1247 Deportation of Bangladeshis https://share.google/MJtkajZglN18yvAgb
yes we can
Holy fuck š
Is this real?
The codeās rules about slavery and religious discrimination are especially troubling. Several articles use the word āslaveā many times, and the code separates āfreeā people from āslavesā in legal terms. This marks the legal acceptance of slavery in Afghanistan.
https://thediplomat.com/2026/01/taliban-introduce-new-criminal-code-in-afghanistan/
This was official gov data
show the data of 2024
India āpushing backā Bangladeshis held without documents - The Hindu https://share.google/6UEh5jUR560nc8vgm
i dunno why r u showing me
āGovernmentā = whatever som guy holding a position of power says
2011 data
This was unofficial cited by a big news agency
you are not making any sense witih the data of 2011
@midnight badge this is from 2025
source - article ?
aren't you the one who believe in the officla data?
verified data
Ngl idk, there may be a Taliban law translate or a website where they upload their laws online, you may be able to find and verify
Big news agencies are better than corrupt and sexist politician, I hope third worlders get smart enough to understand this
still won 't make any sense
Idk if these cavemen have something like this.
Read properly
if you are asking for verified and official data then come up with the same thing
I just got off the phone with Prime Minister Modi. According to the prime minister, @pseudo flume is right.
that's what i also said before
we will be in the loop ig
You also said by default we should trust words of politicians who lack credibility because of corruption and sexist remarks
so you can believe in that and i can believe in that
I'd rather say shit hole
I think I saw a pdf of a translated Taliban law once but Idk, may be hard to find.
Also donāt insult cavemen.
if it's all about believing in source
Fair enough

Feels good to not support corruption and sexism
What are you guys talking about
š
Third worlders wouldn't understand it 
hi myself jew i feel attacked
As you should
Isn't it the guy who used bio weapons to rigg american elections?
š¤¬
I love this quote
I think finally weāve reached agreement, in a different way
i don't think so. made up sh*t by american politics
Also immigration fraud and best tool for diaz
i only care abt his perspective
Democracy basically means: Government by the people, of the people, for the people.... but the people are ret*rded.
there is nothing like democracy , its just mordern slavery

Am I on r/conspiracy again
let's create meritocracy
Every time someone says this ššš
Why do you think you'd be allowed to vote in a meritocracy
you mean just by talent ?
the same way in democracy but based on their skills and qualification
By what merit, I don't think they'd allow self proclaimed enlightened people to choose the govt. in any form
Meritocracy = idk wtf Iām saying I just want to say I want competent people in government and clearly everyone else doesnāt and so these other government systems clearly arenāt attempts to create a competent leadership š
It ignores the fact that classism, racism and sexism can affect where you start out and how you do
He was convicted of immigration fraud btw, it wasn't allegation it was conviction 
Ma anand shela also accepted the bio attack as far as I can recall
yes but why do you think you make the cut
make me leader i'll nuke š®š±
@turbid dome we should do the same, immigration fraud, let's bring Diaz to the land of Free
W
Great business btw
Bet, but I think before we bring Diaz to the land of the free we should give me time to get out
again i can't trust on that. He was banned in most of the country and I think politician will do anything to get rid off it
It's the same logic as when people say we need to go back in time, why do you think you'd be the nobility or the elite, you could be born as a slave
It's like people have this ability to assign privilege to themselves
Iām tired of freedom ngl itās time for tyranny
banned in most of the country ** due to some reason ofc**
Hm
Why
Considering the āyes I will believe what you say Mr politicianā attitude they would end up subservient
You'd have to bomb Japan too
nah we need to set up some minimum eligibility criteria to be a PM and president and based on the minimum criteria people can select them
atheism lol
Those already exist
The first criteria should be not being a p*dophile
š¤£
And Middle East
Why would they ban him for being atheist, doesn't make sense at all
š
ppl giving him everything and religion plays a vital role in politics
Isn't Osho a cult leader
have you read any book of him?
or listen to his videos?
I've watched Children of the cult
that's not even his book or video
Please do not advocate violence against countries or ppl, even in jest
Applies to you too
I know some random tidbits about him, he doesn't portray a good picture though, some say he was running a s*x cult?
It really shouldnāt tho
I'll keep that in mind
He was convicted of immigration fraud by the US government btw
Convict = guilty of a crime
Whose that
They didn't just deport him because he was loved and gov was jealous
Osho
Yeah conviction usually requires a jury and trial
politics is just another name of religion
it goes in hand in hand
Religion requires belief in the supernatural by definition
and i don't care about US government but the only thing I can say about his world pov
Fair enough
religion is based on belief system and the same is true of politics
Politics is just the interaction of people
He wasn't convicted, he was indicted.
"An indictment is a formal accusation or charge of a crime, marking the beginning of a criminal case, whereas a conviction is the final determination of guilt, usually following a trial or plea."
In 1985, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh (Osho) was indicted for conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, specifically regarding sham marriages to help foreign followers secure U.S. residency, and for making false statements to immigration officials
Politics - The interaction of people, governments and power.
Religion - The Belief in the supernatural.
Who was / is the best politician according to you
Thatās like saying whatās the best flavor of ice cream
Chocolate 
religion is too
religion is similar. in politics ppl believe that a politician will do what they promise. they try their best to gain the trust of civilians. in the same way religion is based on belief. many religion include belief in supernatural power and serveral don't. i'm refering to the general idea of religion not the abrahamic concept
See? Itās reletive
i don't really care. i just listen to him
and read his book
but it's been a while
i am just trying to make this chill chat 
LMAFAO
Vanilla is best ngl
chocolate >>
Politics isnāt a belief. Itās a concept term that simply describes and encompasses the interactions of people.
Religion is definitionally required to have a belief in the supernatural.
Politics is a term used to describe a sum total of observations.
You may be mistaking politics with various political values or personal politics
You can take parts of your ideologies from places books and leaders
Doesn't mean they have to be idolised, or a proof that they're a good person.
Politics is a subject term
Like science or math
Itās literally a subject of study not a particular value set
bhai as I already said your defination of religion is based on the abrahmic concept. There are many religion which isn't based on the "supernatural" concept
?def religion
Definition 1 (noun): a strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny
Definition 2 (noun): an institution to express belief in a divine power
so I'm going with the concept of belief
do you know buddhism?
do they believe in supernatural power?
Yes
They believe in Devas (Divine beings)
And rebirth and Karma
And Pretas (Demon/Satan) and the concept of heaven.
gimme a second mom calling me
Buddhist beliefs include, "The universe is viewed as cyclical, with existence spanning six realms (gods, demi-gods, humans, animals, hungry ghosts, and hell) governed by karma."
The essence of religion is believing in a bigger than life divine power. Even Agnostics that aren't truly religious believe in the concept of God as a being which is supernatural already. The only religion that deviates from that is atheism.
there are non theistic religions like Humanism or Naturalism that can be a better example of what you're trying to say
yes im back
Even then they cut it close and border more on philosophy
see even the concept of karma is different in buddhism. can you mention the verse number from the buddhism?
I couldnāt name you most bible verses
Oh...
yea that's what im saying. you are going with the westernize definition of karma. Even the concept of karma is depend on the philosophies
ig as far as i know they have different philosophy
Rebirth is inherently supernatural
and according to them they don't believe karma is all about bad and wrong
im not sure about rebirth and what's the concept according to them and even if i go by ur defination then you are right. But the core idea of politics is ideas & promises.
Politicians make sure that ppl believe in the promises that might be fulfilled. Without belief everything collapses. No one would choose that party. I agree with ur points that politics is about obersvation but it's not solely based on observation . when two parties fighting for votes voters decide based on their past work, personal preferences and the promises (so called manifestos) they make which may or may not be fulfilled
politics was never about any ideas & promises it is about a struggle between powerful groups
unfortunately we live in a democratic country
not in china
that's even more intense in democratic state lmfao
š„² then you have no idea about democracy
in a dictatorship the power is much more centralized, that depends on the leader's performance of handling the internal issues that would ease the intense of struggle
you have no idea about politics, at the fucking all
sure
good for you
in a democratic state, every struggle between interest groups and politicians is even open and could be represented in a very transparent way
also it deepen the split between the people
you know nothing about democratic and authoritarian and politics just by what you have said
you don't even know the nature of struggle and power struggle itself
dude is damn naive to think a struggle can't happen in a liberal democracy
@pseudo flume š
LMFAO
your idea and promises was all used by politicians and interest groups to scam you fucking guys to seize more interest
š¤£
even I could do that
how naive it is to think that idea is pure in where political struggle exist
dude got punched by reality because he's dreaming too much
and sorry I bring that reality on your face
again someone living in china talking abt democracy doesn't make any sense. ik u have read abt it in books but there's a huge diffeence between theory and reality. if u read the whole convo you'd understand what i said instead of acting illiterate and prentending to be dumb. there's no point in talking about democracy with a chinese person
I see you are trying hard to divert from the dumb idea you point itself to my personality or personal status, that doesn't make you look well a little bit
you are still pretty fucked with what you have said
and you are politically illiterate, with a little bit racism and prejudice against people who live in China also ignoring the fact that even if you live in a democratic state you are still nothing because you don't possess any power
politics is for people who holds power
try to get yourself another chance to being slapped by reality that might help you to learn a little bit
š
just like I said, you know nothing about politics, you try to divert to my personal issues but you know nothing about me too
all your idea is suck as fuck which is previously represented
š¤£
I would like to point out my argument again
it's been a while I never seen another guy would fuck around with me
how nice it was
I love it dude
do you live in a democractic country?
Hello @feral river would you like to talk on dms sometime later? I want to talk about China
first of all, that does not even relevant to politics, and second I ever been to a lot of countries, I ever stay in a democratic country for almost a year
you live in a democratic state to have a right to vote does not mean you hold any power to change anything
have you ever voted in a democractic country ?
no, I'm expecting you would say something next that is hilarious as fuck
but would you ?
again you have 0 experience and shit knowledge about democracy
LMFAO
it's a damn logic that if I ask if you don't live here a little bit you wouldn't even know this place ever exist
you have never voted in a democractic country
you don't even live in democractic country
All the democracy in any country is all about manifesto which are promises
dude you are getting yourself more fucked than ever right now
nothing more than that
you live or vote or do anything that does not represent you are participating politcs
do you know manifesto?
actually you are not, at all in this process to gain any type of benefits from just voting and election process
You are coming from a presupposition that China is not democratic
all you would believe your ideal and promises by other people would work for you but they aren't work for you at the fucking all
then enlighten me
all they do is seize interests for themselves
what you do, is pay your fucking taxes or go to jail

dude is so fucked that fucked totally you know nothing about political philosophy while claiming he know fucking politcs is promises
China does not follow the liberal democracy system (multiple parties, private property, capital centered laws)
while China is ruled by a singled party, it does not mean that it does not have democracy. It just does it differently
dude is not even being indoctrinated, he purely know nothing about it
he would assume a person from somewhere that is not democratic to know nothing about other issues
But China is democratic, just not in the western way?
besides he actually know nothing about politics
that is also proven by what he have claimed for
Otherwise it wouldn't be the people's republic
it is actually not, in general consideration
what do you mean by general consideration?
by defining whether a system is democratic you need several factors to meet
People's Republic of China do have every institution that could work as a democratic nation but it does not a democratic nation by practice
show me the democracy in china. The mere existence of multiple parties does not make a country democratic. can you name a single party other than the communist party that has ruled china in the last two decades?
Hail supreme leader
you have the court but court is manipulated, you have the government and election system but it is chosen by upper bureaucrats
that's not how democracy is working
š bro hahahahahah
China is not a democratic state by general standard, it is an authoritarian nation
by democracy you have different forms it is also not only liberal democracy with vote or election that only represent that you are democratic
there are a lot of forms of democracy that functionally could work
Thats exactly what I'm talking about. China is rules by a Communist Party only, but that doesn't mean it's not democratic. If anyone can be part of that party, then it is surely democratic (as long as it allows different perspectives within the party, which is what happens/has happened in china)
the biggest problem of liberal democracy is instability and would deepen the struggle between interest groups and people
also it made people especially upper class chase to use influence on society to seize more interest for their own
it is a result of pro-privatization movement
so China has a massive problem, the same one the USSR had in the post-stalin era with the ŠŠ¾Š¼ŠµŠ½ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŃŠ°, a de-facto elite while having a state that claims to be egalitarian?
nope, every authoritarian is also different
for example, USSR authoritarian system is still based on federalism and elective bureaucrats around 1950-1970s which is the most powerful time in the history
but it has also met a lot of stagnation and rise in inequality compared to the early years
they have a huge authoritarian central government in Moscow but also they have other SSRs which do have very little level of autonomy which does not have exclusive right or power against the government
that is very different between China
again, there are a lot factors that could decide a fate of a nation
you can't just say USSR collapsed because they are too stagnated
that's incorrect, there are a lot of nations stagnated but why USSR collapsed ?
š then what's is communisim ? that's what happens in communism ? only one legal ruling party that holds the power and the members of the ruling party act as an adviser
why didn't China collapse during the cultural revolution
yes of course, but you pointed out they were powerful in a certain time period, and i pointed out it had met a lot of stagnation in that same period
it does not make sense if you simply use one factor to explain it
communism is a stateless society so
it is, but it is not the main issue that they dissolved
i agree but thats not what i said
im just pointing that out
they were mainly dissolved because of the internal turmoil and division in the power core
so? did i say it's not?
especially that initiated by Gorbachev, and division caused by Yeltsin
these two people end the last hope of the USSR and finally made it dissolve
id argue it was because of bureaucratization and a creation of an elite that contributed to the coup in 1991
besides that, they already have huge economic issue, and regionalism is going very high
you implied it by saying "one ruling party". a stateless society cant have a party
corruption is also extremely rampant
people would try to use one factor to say, USSR dissolved because it is so corrupted, that is not true
country is a huge complexity of everything that happens and running in a specific field of territory but economy links and managing bureaucrats
yes i am aware
a country won't die just because of moderate starvation, famine, disaster, or even corruption, authoritarian, division etc.
it was a complex reason that finally give a result of it collapsed
it might be some of these reason by looking it usually but for example division
i just think there were leading factors, the ones i states above, but of course there were multiple complex and interconnected factors
but what case that a division could happen ? that might have a bigger issue behinds this, like internal turmoil, stagnation etc.
power is created by force
and it was irrigated by interest
it is absolutely not just that easy
that's why I say the last guy know nothing about politics because he think that politics is about ideal
politics is not about ideal even a little bit
it is a brutal struggle between interest groups, it is where people try to seize more interest whether inside of a country or outside of the world
it is a survival struggle between all people who live in this struggle where nobody could escape
as long as there are resources, they are interest that ready to seize, there are politics
and there are wars, compromise, distribution etc.
politics was never easy and it can be never easy, it is bloody, brutal but also finally bring the most people a better world
yeah
now going back to china
from what youve told me, it seems china has a problem with bureaucracy, authoritarianism and so on
how can this be solved so china can achieve communism?
I never think that is a problem
bureaucratic problem might exist, but that widely exist everywhere around the world
every modern government is extremely redundant
ofc we need a better solution to that, and authoritarian is inevitable in current world
that doesnt need to be the case necessarily, and it is feasible
we have to be more authoritarian than ever to win the struggle on the globe
as a country
you mean you have to be authoritarian so you can win against imperialism?
no, we don't have a struggle to fight against any imperailism
we only have one struggle in my view, is the struggle of seizing more interest for the country
so which struggle are we talking about here
nothing above the national interest
as the interest of the nation we are entitled to do everything
and what happened to the interests of the working class?
what you're describing is literally fascism
we don't have to care them pretty much, they are losing their value by time
we will use robots and AI systems to replace them finally
at that time their only value to fight for the nation on the ground
I'm a bit confused now. Where do you even stand?
and after we conquered the world entirely, we would have a better institution for all humanity
If robots and AI take all the jobs then how will people even survive
as I far as I know when the perfect times comes in, we should start national-wide mobilization
let them find their rule of survive on the battle ground to seize the interest for the country
they are usage of the people in the future, don't worry too much
so you want another revolution? what the hell
im a little confused on where you stand politically
I was under the assumption you were a Maoist
I don't stand with Mao Zedong's ideal on political struggle or class struggle
I'm not a communist
I stand with all powerful interest groups backed by the nation
they could be bureaucrats, capitalists, congressman
the real elites
and we will stand together to conquer for more
Interesting
Well that sounds quite a lot like fascism, literally
Everything for the state, by all means necessary
we are watching
is there any iranian here, tell us what is happening there
a horrible persecution?

how could they be against their religious leader, thats apparently against the religion right
Hm
They don't want Islamic regime in their country anymore they want freedom
All this guy is saying is "hm"
No more force hijab

This dog look like serial killer
maybe.................
Titan pfp
you guys's profile pictures are creepy!
I'd rather die than someone forced a hijab on me
there is no obedience to any leader in wrongdoing, so opposing injustice is not against Islam
Also we don't believe that shias are muslim

thats ...fine, what kind of reglion are you in , sunni?
I'm sunni muslim , not wahabi
'masks' are weirder bro
No one would force on u to wear hijab frenzy shut up
No reminds me of getting muted in the middle of me typing a msg
Hijab is a political sensitive and disruptive symbol that hold strong intent to cause an instability on society and did trigger the treason against the state
Wearing hijab in prohibited and will be sentenced under the law in PRC
Are u sure you're "beginner?
what is PRC
I like the pink color
Also ofc Iām a beginner
Plz tell me how to speak english
what is Plz..
You yap the most here shush
Embrace death then XD
Also this essay u wrote i agree
Muslim in prc?
'superior language'
Georgians


Really
We'd be Muslims by now otherwise
Yup elections are close, blud's jus mobilizing public opinion
Everyone deserves a place in our society
Assam wasn't only built by the Ahoms, it was a collective effort by every community
The So called miya community also has a great hand in the spread of Assamese language
They were called "No Axomiya Musolman"
What The Cm is doing is literally what the English Did to South Africans
Miya is a community, tho the CM targets them only - the people of the other communities assume "all the muslims" to be of the same community and mentality which is also not right
Hope We Survive Gng
A country in Europe?
Yes
Actually learn Georgian
International language
Georgia look like a female name
No offense but you kinda look like an owl in yo pfp
They are great pets tho- you can adopt one lmao
It was name because of saint George but it's actually Sakartvelo
i dont think you would call your mother tongue an 'inferior language'
I love white owls
They're pretty
The place where I live if you ask them if they are sunni or shia,they will tell you we follow the Quran
There is diffrence in aqeedah . So
thats crazy, whether its easy or not, cant represent your culture
It make a huge difference
just like if your family has less love than others, that doesnt mean they are not a qualified family, family also can be seems as a tool too
Hm
I Know, but if you ask there say they follow the Quran.They are sunnis
Wahabis*
You should follow both Qur'an and Hadith together
And also spiking trucks that carry beef in the highway
You can't understand Qur'an Without fiqh and proper understanding, you can misunderstand if you just keep reading the meaning or translation
We do follow both
Same, reaction when I saw a bunch of fully grown males,set a spike trap in a highway and caused a truck full of beef to swerve off the road and crush.And they didn't even check on the driver
Republican administration is doing the right thing to deal with such case
Even go to war
I never think about a place that is out of the first world
They deserve to be the puppet of superpowers
@fresh flower You da puppet
European domination is end after the WW2
People used to think there will be a cold war after the end of WW2 between Germany and United States during the war
Nobody expected that Nazi Germany actually defeat and itās a cold war between US and SU
Now the most powerful state besides Russia is either France or Germany in Europe
France is also being controlled by leftists the only hope is Germany to have the afd party in charge
And bring Germany back to the path of making Germany great again
They are a threat for all the time to both the Soviet Union now Russian Federation, and the United States
Europe is the biggest challenge that the United States ever experience in terms of financial power and economy
Euro is the biggest challenger of the USD dominance
it is not Russia and China threatening the US dominance in any aspect but Europe did threaten US a lot on this field
and this field is deadly important, that nothing could be more important to the US
if US lose the USD dominance it automatically lose its status as a superpower and all of its leverage will gone as well as the US global order will come to an end
only this is extremely important, also it did happened 2 major cases that US tried so hard to maintain its status
one is Iraq war, which happened after Saddam announced using Euro instead to trade and settle payments on oil
and the second one is boycotting the upcoming Asian trade and currency union which use nationalism in South Korea and Japan and China in early 2010s to boycott the idea of creating a East Asia Union like the EU
if any of these could be established, there will come to an end of the US dominance, and US will become a regular great power in the North America, lose their special status, lose the biggest military on the planet, lose their trade advantage, lose everything they could expect like the British Empire
that is a disaster to all people who live in the US regardless of whether you are rich or not
people are seeming to be naive to believe that they don't need to spend extra their healthcare money on military or for conquering something
but this world is about survival for the fittest, if you don't drop yourself in, you are out
and once you are out, it's not the issue where you are going to spend your money on, but you don't have that money anymore
Its 25c today
No more cold yay
According to Ibn Abbas (ra) in Bukhari 3851:
Allah's Messenger ļ·ŗ was inspired Divinely at the age of forty. Then he stayed in Mecca for thirteen years, and then was ordered to migrate, and he migrated to Medina and stayed there for ten years and then died.
According to Ibn Abi Abdur-Rahman in Bukhari 3547:
Divine Inspiration was revealed to him when he was forty years old. He stayed ten years in Mecca receiving the Divine Inspiration, and stayed in Medina for ten more years.
The same event of the Prophet Muhammad ļ·ŗ staying in Mecca has been given different amount of time in Bukhari which is the most authentic book after the Quran. This shows that narrations in Hadith need to be explored more with other sources to determine accuracy in regards to numbers, especially when dates of events are involved. The same applies for the age of Aisha (ra) that has different narrations with different ages.
Remember, a narration can be authentic but that doesn't mean the substance of the narration is accurate, especially when it comes to age and dates for those days.
Abu Bakrs' daughters born before 610AD
According to Tabari, all four daughters of Abu Bakr, including Aisha, were born before the revelation of Islam in 610AD. The marriage of Aisha to Prophet Muhammad ļ·ŗ took place one year after the migration around 624AD. Even if Aisha was born 1 year before the revelation of Islam in 609AD, this puts her age at around 15 during the marriage.
Age in Comparison with Older Sister
Furthermore, according to other historical sources such as Al-Nawawi, Ibn Kathir and Ibn Hisham, Asma who is Aisha's sister, was 10 years older than Aisha. She died at the age of 100 around in 73AH or 695AD. Asma was born in 596AD and was 14 years old when Islam began. Aisha would have been 4 when Islam began in 610AD. This means Aisha would have been born in 606AD. At the time of migration Asma would have been around 27 years old. If Aisha was 10 years younger than her, then she would have been around 17 years old during the migration and thus 18 years old during the marriage a year later. Or if other narrations are correct then she would have been 14-15 when she was married and 17-18 when the marriage was consummated a year after the migration in 623AD.
Age in Comparison with Daughter of Prophet Muhammad ļ·ŗ
There is also her age compared to Fatima, the daughter of the Prophet ļ·ŗ.
Ibn Hajar al-AsqallĆ”ni states in al-IsĆ”bah, citing al-WĆ”qidi, on the authority of al-AbbĆ”s (uncle of the Prophet ), that āFatima was born while the Ka`ba was being built⦠and the Prophet was thirty-five years of age⦠and she [Fatima] was about five years older than Aisha.ā
This again would lead us to conclude that Aisha would have been born one year before the revelation of Islam. This would mean that by the time of migration she would have been at least 14 years old and thus 15 years old at the time of marriage. Again this shows that the narrations of 6-9 are unreliable and shows different narrations and historians leading to different conclusions about her age.
Aisha remembers a revelation of the Quran
Sahih Bukhari 4993
While I was a young girl (jariyah in arabic) of playing age, the following Verse was revealed in Mecca to Muhammad: 'Nay! But the Hour is their appointed time (for their full recompense), and the Hour will be more grievous and more bitter.' (54.46)
Chapter 54 was revealed around 4-5 years after the first revelation to the Prophet ļ·ŗ in 610AD, so around 614-15AD. If Aisha was married to the Prophet ļ·ŗ at the age of six at 624AD, then she would not have been even born at the time of the revelation of this verse. Yet she remembers this revelation and was of a playing age during its revelation. Hence, this contradicts the narration of her being married at 6 or 9 and shows that her estimate of her age was incorrect due to the lack of calendars.
Furthermore, Ibn SÄ«dah and Ibn ManįŗÅ«r say in al-Muįø„kam and Lisanul Arab dictionary that āThe word jÄriyah means a young girl (fatiyyah).ā The word fatiyyah means an adolescent girl (shÄbbah). It seems as though they would use the word jÄriyah for a girl at the beginning of her adolescence because she is still running here and there [playing]. A 4 year old is not called a jariyah unless it is to contrast a male and female in the same sentence. Hence, in this case it refers to a younger girl who is almost an adolescent. She would have been around 7-9 years old when this verse was revealed in 614-15AD. This places her age at 16-18 years old at the time of marriage one year after migration in 624AD.
Aisha remembers the Migration to Ethiopia
Sahih Bukhari 2297:
(wife of the Prophet) Since I reached the age when I could remember things, I have seen my parents worshipping according to the right faith of Islam. Not a single day passed but Allah's Messenger ļ·ŗ visited us both in the morning and in the evening. When the Muslims were persecuted, Abu Bakr set out for Ethiopia as an emigrant.
Generally, children begin to remember and understand more complex things like the religion of their parents at around 5-6 years old. If we assume that she was born around 4-6 years after Islam then the statement of Aisha narrating her parents being Muslims at the age of her awareness and memory is useless to recount as it is well known that Abu Bakr was one of the early converts to Islam. If this were the case then she would obviously have began having memories and awareness while her parents were Muslim. However, if she was born 4 years before Islam then this statement is necessary as it shows that she was born before Islam but her awareness and memory began while her parents were Muslim as opposed to any other religion of the time.
Secondly, Aisha recalls the migration to Ethiopia which happened in 615AD, 5 years after the revelation of Islam. Even if she was married at 9 years old at 624AD then she would have been a few months to 1 years old at the time of migration to Ethiopia which is not possible as she remembers it happening. Once again this is proof that she was not 6 or 9 at the time of marriage as should would have been at least 5 years or older during 615AD.
Aisha was present at the Battle of Uhud
The battle of Uhud took place 2 years after the migration to Medina at 625AD.
Sahih Bukhari 2664
Allah's Messenger ļ·ŗ called me to present myself in front of him on the eve of the battle of Uhud, while I was fourteen years of age at that time, and he did not allow me to take part in that battle, but he called me in front of him on the eve of the battle of the Trench when I was fifteen years old, and he allowed me (to join the battle)." Nafisaid, "I went toUmar bin Abdul Aziz who was Caliph at that time and related the above narration to him, He said, "This age (fifteen) is the limit between childhood and manhood," and wrote to his governors to give salaries to those who reached the age of fifteen.
Sahih Bukhari 2880
On the day (of the battle) of Uhad when (some) people retreated and left the Prophet, I saw `Aisha bint Abu Bakr and Um Sulaim, with their robes tucked up so that the bangles around their ankles were visible hurrying with their water skins (in another narration it is said, "carrying the water skins on their backs"). Then they would pour the water in the mouths of the people, and return to fill the water skins again and came back again to pour water in the mouths of the people.
The Prophet ļ·ŗ did not let a 14 year old boy on or near the battlefield. If Aisha was 6 years old when she married the Prophet ļ·ŗ one year after the migration, she would have been 7-8 years old during this battle. Why would the Prophet ļ·ŗ allow a 7-8 year old girl to give water and nurse the soldiers at the battlefield? He could have given that task to 14 year old boys instead and save the younger girls from being so close to danger. This would also provide some experience and preparation for the boys to see what a real war is like. We can conclude that Aisha was older than 15 years old during the battle of Uhud.
Conclusion
There is more evidence that we could discuss but what I have provided should suffice. It is clear that we cannot determine the age of Aisha with certainty as many scholars have said, but there is more evidence to point to the fact that she was between 15-18 years old when she married the Prophet ļ·ŗ as opposed to 6 or 9 years old. We will never accurately know her age but I think we have enough evidence to suggest that she was not 6 or 9 years old when she married the Prophet ļ·ŗ. For anyone to say that the age of 6 or 9 years old at marriage is an established fact is being disingenuous.
gpt shit
its not gpt
i saved it cause islamophopes have nothing else except few arguments.
go to ask a muslim vc
This is longest comment I have seen here
š
cuz this ain't ask a muslim chat
is there any rule to not talk about this
yes
r u dumb? that's why they made religious vc to keep the shit there
ok sy bau
its your personal problem
way to avoid engaging with evidence
Imagine believing imaginary beings are real, can't relate
Blud thatās not how evidence works.
Saying āa book has inaccuracies, therefore this specific paragraph is wrongā is a logical fallacy.
Idc who are you ,
All of this is perspective anyway. If bro was Thai, bro would most likely not be Muslim. Believing in imaginary beings is cultural
We ostracize so many groups, but tolerate the fact that people are indoctrinated into believing unreal beings since childhood. That ain't right.
By that logic
Being born anywhere would make mathematics ācultural"
No. Mathematics is universal. 1+1 is 2 regardless of where you are in the world.
Believing in Allah is constrained to the Middle East. Believing in INSERT TYPE OF GOD HERE is solely geographical. Aboriginals in Australia have a different belief system, as do Native Americans, as do Chinese, etc. It's solely cultural.
that's what they feed into children's brain
If the paragraph is wrong, show one concrete inaccuracy
the idea that belief in Allah is āMiddle Easternā is just factually wrong. š
Prove it.
It comes from there.
Those books, Q'uran, Bible - written by MEN eons ago in order to find ways to instill fear in others so they obey, conform and comply. (OCC).
All the big three religions came from there
Are u Jewish?
Right, but arguably Christianity did a "better job" at spreading out and INFECTING other parts of the world than Islam.
How so
Missionaries.
Just like English came from England, Christianity/Islam are cultural things imported from the M.E.
I'm saying believing in God is cultural.
Some people wake up and realize there is no supernatural anything.
You donāt read hadith by cherry-picking one report;
when the accounts differ scholars compare and reconcile them
Some don't.
Idk man u sound like a Jewish to me
Never mentioned Judaism

I'm not Jewish, but what is your problem with Jews? I'm also not religious. I'm agnostic.
Hm
Suspicious
Gtk
Allah does not mean āMiddle Eastern godā
Allah just means āThe One Godā in Arabic,
a word Arab Christians used long before Islam geography explains language,
for real he don't want to get counter replied with talmud
It's obvious bro. If you don't see religion as a cultural heritage, you're just unwilling to wake up... And that's ok. It's your life. Believe what you want.
Culture affects the exposure,
culture do not effect the truth otherwise no belief, including atheism, would ever be rational.
Some cultures just blindly follow a faith but itās within your hands to ābreakā if needed that chain of cultural practices and choose your own path if it seems more convenient for your values. We all have brilliant minds to make our own choices and see the pros and cons of it.
Also From an Islamic view, Islam wasnāt invented in the Middle East
itās the continuation of the same belief in one God that existed long before cultures formed
Yeah, but your truth is completely debunked the moment you leave your geographical area where everyone believes what you believe in. If you were born in any other place, unless your family is with you and INDOCTRINATES you elsewhere and teaches you the ways, you'd likely believe different things.
Exactlyy what I've been trying to say all these time
Bro Geography explains what ideas youāre first exposed to,
and not whether those ideas are true otherwise no one could ever rationally convert, question, or change beliefs,
Wrong. Religion teaches "discipline", which means respecting authority figures and not questioning "THE WORD".
even the oldest scriptures are only about 6k-7k years old yet new religions try to frame themselves in a way that they exist way before despite having no concrete evidence for that. The same goes for islam, christianity, hinduism, jewish and etc
As I said, some may follow blindly some not and eventually establish themselves a clear path for future generations and gift that belief ^^
Religion is a tool. Don't you see it? Through the word of God, MEN get to oppress women, gays, the poor and many other marginalized groups.
If potential bias invalidates scholarship,
then no history, science, or academia survives skepticism has to be consistent
This subject is too complex to text about it. If y'all get on VC sometime feel free to ping...otherwise I digress
Respecting discipline isnāt the same as
banning questions
Islamic tradition is literally built on debate and questioning thatās why there are four major imams with different legal opinions, all accepted within Islam.
science is based on actual facts through observation and experiment
can u do it with the religious scriptures ?
You are right some may follow blindly
Itās already proven bud
proven wat?
How come can you imagine to have found real science when God already wrote that and sent those books on Earth
With most of the proven scientific evidences
š show the scienctific evidences
If only experiments count as knowledge, then history, law, ethics, and even parts of science itself disappear
of what exactly you want
Pff Iām not a theologist nor a book reader you can do your research on evidences found in the Quran if youāre interested
even the history has actual evidence of it
š
Why you laughing
Bias only matters if you prove where it distorts the claim
I read some parts basically
Not me reading a book or being lazy to show proofs change the fact those evidences are within the Quran
i said observation and experiment
do you know how historians piece things together and determine historical evidence and on what basis they do it? It's not like religious book you just believe in it
history uses real evidence, just not lab experiments.
They do use lab experiments like radio carbon and forensic etc to find the actual basis. History isn't about believing in things
Like quran, bible geeta
Me and minecraft (he's getting suffocated)
PSALM 81:10
You're welcome.
Whenever I play mc I get motion sickness
š i dunno why
Change the FOV
Fov?
FOV = Field of View
It's normally a graphics/video setting, in Minecraft however, the setting is not in the video settings menu
Too high or too low FOV can cause issues with some people's eyesight/motion
Ohh ic
Will try thx u
Quran is not a science textbook, it has descriptions of the natural world that were well beyond the knowledge of its time like **mountains having a stabilizing effect, **
the layered darkness of the deep oceans, **
and the staged development of the human embryo**
and many more .
These were written long before the advent of modern geology, oceanography, and embryology, and these are seen as evidence of its divine origin by believers.
minecraft does have fov settings, wdym?
Hm
epic peanuts
what qur'an wrote about all those 'ogy, was already known before qur'an, probably closer to the ancient greek.
so we can say pagans were two steps ahead, right ?
HI GUYS I AM BACK
Not sure about bedrock, but java has always had the FOV setting outside the video settings tab, unless they changed it very recently
add me in your server gandu
Even bedrock has
oh you meant that
my bad then, i didnt understand correctly
Idk if its in the video/graphics menu or outside of it though
In java its not in the video settings menu
Every other game, FOV settings are in video/graphics
Ohh now i got it
it is proven that is effective to name things after Trump will increase his popularity
we need more of it
we need everything that is around him
Make America Great Again
long before when? give the proof of that? which year? show the staged dev of the human embryo? quran is only 1400 years old and greeks r way older than that
even it's not a science textbook what's the basis of it
was it even great once
The Qurāan (e.g., 23:12ā14) describes staged human development in sequence
not as modern embryology,
but as ordered stages.
Greeks had speculative theories too, many of which were biologically wrong (like semen forming the whole human)
Do u study linguistics
No. this is history
and the same theology can go with the greek too
Youāre reading a translation literally and judging it by modern lab language.
the Qurāan uses classical Arabic descriptions, not embryology textbooks.
This is a linguistic mistake.
The Qurāan uses descriptive Arabic terms, not technical the biology.
ŹæAlaqah doesnāt mean a literal āblood clotā
it means something that clings or attaches, which fits early implantation; the verse gives stages in sequence, not a morden description or medical diagram
even if i take that clings its still biologically wrong
Itās only ābiologically wrongā if you expect a 7th century Arabic text
ig greek is more better atleast they gave the better explanation
š you can use any terms but the fact won't change that's why all the scientific discoveries in religious scriptures proven wrong
i would say this is the better explanation at that time
even before ur scriptures
Describing nature is not equal to doing science. Youāre conflating the two
what if it is
whatever happening in ur surrounding has some reason which is backed by the science
Galen guessed mechanisms and got them wrong later.
the Qurāan isnāt doing speculative biology in the first place
aren''t you the one who was saying greek were biologically wrong

šæ
Join
even if something is proven wrong you still wonāt believe that your scripture was wrong
Cz its not 
bro def has 0 point
except disrespecting religions there's nothing else any atheist debater know
sadly, all humans wants to be right
i need a femboy worshipper in my life

femboy god
goodluck
wtf
oh ok ok
i know, i just generalize smh. i dont hide it
r u atheist too?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Semen
Galenās model treats semen as the formative substance of the body
On Semen (De Semine), also known as On the Seed (Peri spermatos) is a medical treatise written by the Greek physician Galen. In this work, Galen writes about the physiology of animal reproduction, provides detailed anatomical descriptions of the reproductive organs and their purposes, and also deals with inheritance and embryology. The first boo...
What about jews
im a theist
to be rare ? dude ydk based atheism
i can tell you arent on any debate server
bro at that time it was fine. im using ur arguement. Atleast they knew the semen
oh ok ok
Zoroastrianism?
debaters are most likely toxic
Mentioning semen is not equal to claiming semen explains embryology.
Greeks made mechanisms; the Qurāan didnāt.
and if we still disagree Letās leave it there.

are you roasting urself
so in your religion you believe in science and recite maxwell's equation every morning
then go to the island to pay homage to hawking
they pray to the big bang
Vencord user
Isn't this guy is in epstien files 
Hawking gawking

then it same goes with the quran. You just don't wanna apply ur own concept on ur religious scriptures
I told u the clinging thing it's still biologically wrong and you also know it's biologically wrong.
do you live in 7th century or wot? is the quran meant to be eternal or was it intended only for the 7th century?
the way you guys start preaching out the no-god slogan it almost feels like a religion, cuz atheists try even harder to spread their word than some religions do
The Qurāan is eternal in guidance and meaning,
And not a frozen 7th-century science manual;
it uses timeless, non-technical language to point to realities, not to compete with modern biology calling that ābiologically wrongā assumes a claim it never makes
Hm
Hm
does god even know the term "modern biology" ? ig for him biology would just be biology since he already possess complete knowledge. so why would he say smth that could later be proven wrong by modern biology
Am i educating myself here
#š«ļ½beginner-chat thats the chat for 3rd world people
25-40k r*pes in your shitass country btw
per year
Did you hit your head again
r you a handsome latino then
Guys please fight over something its so boring
better you to read things
read your scholars
you learn about your religion tho
I do occasionally
i saw what straight men see in a girl now
U are an orthodox christian, arab, and gay
Crazy combination
Pick one struggle
It's more than ĵust that
We don't go on liking every other woman lmao
Maybe some do
thats where you belong
yes, and ?
bro ik
What and?
so what?
Why do you look for means
yes im lesbian arab and eastern orthodox, so? what's the matter
im like that naturally
im just always on a defensive way, dont take it deep, its normal
I mean some are hot and some are absolutely adorable or cute but I know that most of people with good face always have something bad in them
Yo
most people with a face always have something bad in them
No
When you pretend
It overflows
Always thinking in both ways while being along with such people is crucial
Since you never know when they actually do something
I like whatever is going on with you.
Why
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
I don't.
I'm joking
Who's capable of learning meta awareness and okish looks.
What do you mean by meta awareness solvent
It's a skill.
A special kind of skill to say the least.
It allows a person to realise they are thinking while thinking.
So basically, thinking on why are you thinking.
I see, but how will you know if someone is like that solvent?
The perfect example how it can be used is this.
Most people say.
I am angry.
While a person with meta awareness would say.
I feel anger rising inside me.
Not angry feeling angry different things.
Tests, I have my ways.
It's cool.
ty
I hope it's not a sniff test
Find one.
Something you can't negotiate if your partner doesn't have.
Yeah like I'm getting anyone

I just know it
that's cynical
Everyone has something wrong with them
Everyone has bad traits
A perfect person doesn't exist
Beautiful is not rotten
Ugly is not rotten
Everyone has something behind their back
BUT
That doesn't mean everyone is horrible
ALSO
Beauty is subjective
What is beautiful for you is not beautiful for someone else
For example most people find pimples ugly but if you would ask me they are very cute
Therefore an "ugly" face is not ugly for me
Which means everyone is beautiful
And everyone has a pretty face
If you like someone else's looks it doesn't mean they are going to manipulate you
Pretty privelage exists for people who are attractive to more people than usual but it also comes with it's drawbacks and people are not talking about those enough
The diversity in everyone's looks is beautiful
Everyone has their own type
I hate curly blonde hair but some people love it
I'm not a saint to think of others as if I have and will walk the earth like forever. I do things because I find them relevant and actually work in real life. It might not look or seem like a good thinking but I was never let down by my subconscious.
Eventually a line is crossed between right and wrong
And staying put is what makes me, me
Did people do anything bad to you or you just ran away the moment something felt off
Does that mean you do not observe your feelings and let your subconscious rule over your conscious?
Did you ever give your conscious a chance?
Is there a reason behind your thought pattern?
Is this a survival mechanism?
Is this something ingrained in you and is not in fact a survival mechanism?
I want to know more
What made you think this way
What made you connect beauty with malice
Please I'm dying to know the answers 
Meh it's not rocket science or something
Yes
I just do either way it seems right
It is not rovcket science
Why does it seem right for you
I want to know your point of view
Because I don't find enough negatives against positives
I need friend
Me too
I am 16 male
Ok
You
š
Underage š
Hello
š¤
You mean
Who is here? Xyz
Can you friend me
XYZ's gender is unknown
Dead chatš«„
In a church orthodox there is no acolytes like the church of rome right? @wet flax
orthodox churches, there is no formal "acolyte" like in the roman catholic church, there are altar servers (often readers or subdeacons) who assist the priest during the liturgy.
Oohh
I asked that question because I'm acolyte server in my church and I was curious because the Orthodox Church didn't have one
Tht belarussian guy maybe
No.
Is anyone still here
No
Um hmm
Can someone tell me how can I study in grammar š
I keep studying the rules and I keep forgetting it š
Anybody Living in Netherlands?!
Use it frequently ig? Like immediately after you learn something
Not now but Iāll soon
I mean Ik š but remembering all those rules is kinda hard yk
Iām just searching for another method
Idk

U did ielts test?
No, natives donāt have to do that stuff
Still do
Lilililiiiiiiiii where have u been
Oh right I keep forgetting
Someone in the chat here
Helloe
Yo
Hi chara
İts going goodd
bro leave me on youtuve
youtube*
i have a FOL thing on God existance
on my phone
which i dont have
first order logic
not rlly
prepare the tribe and chinese new year after that i wiill go to visit bangaldesh and india and then recently i am busy with work
do es religion need god or humans need god
humans need God
yww
why?
ofc you arent a theist
without God there's no meaning
meaning of what
many people suffering from war, but god does not help anything
theodicy
Oh cool hope u have funnnnn
you creates your meanings, nothing else
thank u
š 



