#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 860 of 1
You were not wrong
#š§ ļ½serious-chat message
People like me and Nale would strongly dispute that.
Cough Cough. Rohingya genocide.
Please do not delude yourself my dear.
Rohingya refers to bangladeshi?
Christianity is as guilty as Islam and whatever other religions you could name
I don't think so. They are Muslim minority in south Asia and south east Asia.
Ok how?
Crusades?
The Rohingya have faced decades of discrimination and repression under successive Myanmar authorities. Effectively denied citizenship under the 1982 Citizenship Law, they are one of the largest stateless populations in the world. About one million Rohingya are currently living in overcrowded camps in Bangladesh, most of whom fled Myanmar in 2017...
Oh ok then jain are peaceful
Salem, the Crusades (obvs low hanging fruit), modern discriminatory practices, several genocides.
the opposite I would consider if you are talking me supporting an evil side
Yeah⦠they aināt exactly any better.
what is even that religion about? Never heard about it before.
I will clear this in 3 to 4 points
First: the Quran does not prescribe death for leaving Islam Belief and disbelief are repeatedly left to Godās judgment
Second: this report refers to zanadiqa, a historical term for people involved in political rebellion, or violent subversion not someone quietly changing belief
Third: even in this report, it is about state authority and courts, not individuals
Vigilante killing is forbidden in Islam
Reducing Islam to a single historical report while ignoring the Qurāan and centuries of scholarly debate is exactly the misinformation I was talking about
Jain and parsi
justice or evil is subjective in broad general concept of public standard
Kinda hard to say that Christianity is peaceful when I look out my window and my several local churches are preaching to end my existence.
Iāve explained my position clearly
And now lām not interested in going in circles
I don't think so when you have fault in your own religion you should blame others
it is not when it was in Europe
It was worse arguably
it is not before slavery abolished
Hm it's tit for tat
If Christian does something doesn't mean Christianity allows it. Crusades main purpose was to bring the lands that were invaded by muslims and Christianity is most targeted and mocked religion
I would have a huge respect to people who have a commitment to support their life, but none for anyone use this commitment as a way of scam to push people into a deep hell while plunge everything into dust
Guess you know better than scholars
As Iāve said several hundred times now. Those actions are informed by Christian teachings
You cannot separate the two
There is corollary causation.
that's why I would suggest if everybody should be allowed to follow any religion or ideology/commitment, but using this to influence society is prohibited
that was quite different from what we used to say 'our view' which is the view of CCP bureaucrats
I'm much more liberal than that
If you say verses commanding death in your scripture are no longer valid or were changed by humans, then you are admitting you donāt follow those commands anymore
That means youāre not following the text literally youāre interpreting it
And thatās exactly the point Iām making
Thereās a reason most homophobic people are christian, why most anti-lgbt legislation is voted for by christians, why most anti-trans people are christian,
But capitalism and nationalism are fair game./s
This is not a hard thing to see
that's politics and ideological so
And itās not to say Christendom is worse or better than other faiths
just leave that space for guns and wars to solve
Tradition is the enemy of progress and often the oppressor of minorities
and give people a common right of believing anything they want
war is the supreme court of the civilization of humanity
but we don't have to use the most expensive way to solve the issues
I don't claim this that I know better than scholars
Iām saying people should study their own religion seriously and understand scholarly debates before using selective quotes to attack another faith
you want to say conservatism but I respect that you said tradition instead
now I have to agree because I'm quite anti-tradition but not conservatism
I donāt have to, you said it for me
Just because something is old, does not grant it my respect
tradition is much more right than just being conservative
I can tho if I go out and kill someone for religion doesn't mean God allows it
But if you did it because of religion and a thousand other people ALSO do it because of religion, itās time to start dissecting what about these teachings is radicalizing people, and galvanizing them to violence.
You should apply same logic when someone do that in the name of islam.
^^^^^^
if you pull a spectrum on considering how much right a person actually are, there is the one that you may not endorse traditional stuff but also respect the de facto situation
We don't agree with it because it was written before Jesus and he denied it and for you Muhammad was the prophet and you follow whatever that mentally ill guy says
āMentally ill guyā
You canāt even grant the same grace to another personās faith as your own.
But islam allows it Christianity doesn't
Even your bio @rugged gyro screams prejudice
Personal insults donāt strengthen an argument
Muslims believe Muhammad ļ·ŗ was a prophet, just as Christians believe Jesus was
Disagreement doesnāt justify disrespect.
Christians still do it because of their religion though.
actually you could find an excuse to justify violence in every religion
and violence isn't a bad thing dude
This is what gets my goose. Here you are saying Christendom doesnāt endorse all these bad things, @rugged gyro But then youāre being discriminatory on the basis of religion.
Make it make sense.
only you use violence in a situation that you shouldn't use it is bad
violence is not the goal but the way to realize the goal
violence itself is neutral
For real
even it is bad defined by who has in charge
if you are the emperor and you sign the execution order against who you don't like that could work
send anyone to concentration camps, not a surprise
you used violence maybe that's not the best way to deal with it, but that could work
and you pay the price of using it
I mean your bio is clearly a statement against refugees from Middle Eastern countries fleeing to Western countries.
How do you sit here and justify blanket assumptions about these people?
@rugged gyro
How the fuck am I going to respond all these wtf
Your own god says to love the foreigner and welcome him into your lands as if he were your own.
Yet look at your bio
Yes I'm against Muslims living in my country
Hey!
How can I understand movies fluency in English??
I never said vigilante killing is allowed in Islam.
Mohamed is clear with his words in the report. Quran changed it's philosophy toward multiple things through it, whether its drinking alcohol, Nikah al-mutah, etc.. and the idea that god will judge people does not negate that Muslims could be commanded to kill those.
Also, you are wrong about zanadiqa. It simply means someone who is an "atheist", it was used and still used to label Muslims who don't follow mainstream ideas, not strictly rebels. No mention of rebellion in the Hadith I brought.
ZindÄ«q (pl. zanÄdiqa) is an Islamic pejorative applied to individuals who are considered to hold views or follow practices that are contrary to central Islamic dogma.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zandaqa#
ZindÄ«q (pl. zanÄdiqa) is an Islamic pejorative applied to individuals who are considered to hold views or follow practices that are contrary to central Islamic dogma. Zandaqa is the noun describing these views.
Zandaqa is usually translated as "heresy" and is often used to underscore the seriousness of the religious views of the accused indivi...
Oh nooo how dare I
there are no refugees, only people who intend to invade a western nation by ideology influence and resentment caused retaliation
Thatās not very christian of you
š±
I'm gonna respond all these when I'm home
also they are refugees does not justify they should be accepted in another country
Aren't they supposed to take refuge in the first safe country
Iām just saying. You say others are misusing your religion. But youāre not even abiding by those principles either
They do. Top countries that take Muslim refugees are Muslim countries surrounding where refugees flee from.
What do you mean by that? The first world should accept refugee is that what you mean?
What's the first world
I'm saying they should take refuge in the first safe country
Generally but not always. Especially if the countries theyād flee to have the same problems theyāre fleeing from
United States of America, People's Republic of China, Russian Federation
Western countries
Just because I follow Christianity doesn't mean I can't have my opinion on immigration
I support massive deportation actually

Hm
Basically you said that refugees escape to nearby country they think they will be safe, correct?
That tracks
Deport all the illegals
And most of Muslims too
When Ukrainians flee from Ukraine the first safe country usually is Poland and it's reflected by how many live there
Europe
you must support Trump administration
But they arenāt illegal
No one here is that evil
I once met someone from Gambia and he said he was a refugee in my country
But aren't there at least 5 or more safe countries between Gambia and Finland
talking about immigration, how can I (a Brazilian) can go to the US nowadays? legally
Epic
I don't like trump but trump over kamala any day
You only wish I was racist
My brain is bursting
How, Trump is pro-Russian

Hm
Yeah we gotta pick and choose let the smart ones stay and kick low iq inbreds and everyone who demands sharia law, assaults women and kids, who doesn't respect culture and destroy churches
It can't be a coincidence that every single thing Trump does, except the Maduro arrest, benefits Russia
Problem with that is neighbour countries aren't always friendly y'know. Ideally we should help each other but country also have its own problems it need to solve too so, you can't rely them to take all refugees.
Busting?
Did you just call muslims inbred and low iq�
Kamala is woke and stupid
Yeah but they don't kill Gambians in many of those safe countries, for example if I were a refugee I wouldn't end up in Japan, that would be ridiculous. It's far from where I live and there are many more closer safe countries
Real
well they aren't low iq but they should be deported because they clearly violate laws and commit crimes and attempt the cause a national security disaster to the nation
It's better than being pro-Russian tho, Trump may help deleting your country from the world map
A thought just spawned in my head: Why is english so painfully slow?
I know 2 languages: polish and english. When I compare them to each other, it is much faster to convey a message in polish than in english. I know that languages have different speeds, but that's not what I mean. I've noticed that english takes much more time to express simple thoughts, for example: | I don't eat vs Nie jem | | I don't think so vs Nie sÄ
dzÄ | | I've been thinking vs MyÅlaÅem | . English is very blocky and bad at delivering information in fast speed. I think both of these languages could be considered as slow. English should compensate by being spoken faster, yet it isn't.
Noo
also they are mostly illegal aliens in the country
That would be so inappropriate
Hm
Inbreds are low iq ones they shouldn't be marrying their cousins
they would used to commit crime and use their ideology to influence society which damage the national interest of the country
Perhaps you should take a break, drink some water, reflect on what you said and reconsider if that was appropriate for this forum.
I'm sorry for you guys in Caucasus but literally your countries are small and some of you (Armenia and Azerbaijan) allied with Russia, Russia only has Turkey opposing them there. Your countries may stop existing in some decades
Nah I'm good
I insist
It's one of the shittiest place to exist geographically
hey @misty zinc , @stable magnet ,
well isn't Baku the largest oil fields of Russia
I don't want to
I thought Azerbajan Soviet Socialist Republic was still part of Russia
No it's Siberia
Girl you are 36 years behind
You will be muted bro don't argue further š
no
Isn't this allowed in Christianity too
Hm

Stop goooning.
I don't 
Lies
Sure buddy, whatever you say.
Noooooooo
Hi ily
Ihy.
why the heck you are this liberal I wonder damn much about it
What's happening, why is this chat always an active war field

at least I got a field for Republicans
Actually I have an interesting story
Why should one not be liberal
Hail the Supreme Leader
Weāre not deprived of education enough to have one of those
I hate you for ily.
a good reason to abolish DOE
This is a clown-ass take
proven educational scam to indoctrinate people to become liberals
I join this question
Ugh 2026 is hurting my brain
Yes
How? 2026 has been great.
Brother liberal bias is generally a result of knowing more, not indoctrination.
I'm exhausted, physically and mentally. Too much has been happening
Yes
That's why you should take a bath
Just too eventful
If being correct is woke then my eyes are open wider than the Mariana Trench.
AHDHDJDBDGUSBDHDI HOW'D YOU KNOW I WAS PROCRASTINATING ON THAT
Stinky. Go bathe
I just came back from gym I really need a shower
ššš» Okay fam
No you need a bath
get yourself a bath
In a good way or bad?
a nice one with warm water
that's because they didn't learn very much about conservatism philosophy
some candles
School doesnāt teach liberal or conservative philosophy
idk anything that would make you relax even bottles will do
It teaches facts
I'm not saying they should defend slavery and racism to be conservative but at least hold a position that is swinging between these
Thatās not schoolās job
between slavery and racism?
It teaches you to function in society. Tolerating your peers is a requirement to a functional democracy.
Thatās not woke thatās just preschool shit
by telling people everybody enjoy a human right regardless of their nationality ?
that is out of the line dude
š
yes exactly that
Lmao that's the most liberal thing you could think of?
saying everybody even aliens deserve US constitutional rights
Minecraft is a grifter don't listen to her
it's like what in the fucking shit
Brother, itās teaching kids not to bully others
Thatās it
Have you ever met an alien?
The fuck are you on about
Slightly negative leaning
oh really then why he's about to abolish it
if it's just teaching kids not to bully
Trumps dumb
Trump is smart asf to defend his interest group and Jeffery Epstein
don't question his IQ
Because if you call something woke then get rid of it, his dumbass base will think he did a good thing, not realizing he just cancelled suicide watch campaigns
??? That's so horrible of you to say

What the fuck
I genuinely think Minecraft is a troll hired by the russian government
that's not a secret, everybody knows
Heās Chinese
That's not in the way of it

Far right politicians in poland get hired by russians all the time
He's smart for protecting a p*dophile?
Ok buddy, Good luck man.
Thanks, likewise
I think that requires a level of subtlety Mine does not possess.
well Jeffery Epstein wasn't just a p*dophile actually
He seems to have views that think states don't have moral obligations, and that on a state level whoever has power can do whatever they want. But in addition to that, he often seems to be just trolling here.
he's one of the core link that provide the best services to upper class people
There's a clear distinction between Intellect and morality for Minecraft_652
āThe best servicesā
Mine, youāre soundinā really fucking sus right now
that's what he have done, well that's the reason he had so many links with these top bureaucrats even the President
they have to redact the file almost entirely covered or else it's gonna be a huge drama
omg I just got what you mean lol.
again I'm just talking about the truth, I didn't defend him neither his activity, but he is the man to serve these people
People of the serious chat should file an appeal for Minecraft to shorten his name for easier conversations
How does āPedo Defenderā sound?
I shall file an appeal to give Minecraft a serious-chat ban
I'm not a fucking p*do defender
they are not serious at all
Itās been tried.
š
they tried like 5 times
how are you still standing heree
What came out of it then
Getting rid of Mine is like trying to ban Ronald McDonald from McDonalds.
Heās a clown but heās our clown.
because I'm Minecraft
Minecraft is invincible
no
He actually got muted and banned multiple times. They'll eventually have enough of him I guess.
I had federal immunity
He's kept as an engagement bait for newcomers, I think
He baits people to argue more
The fact that you donāt realize why is both sad and funny⦠š
SHE'S HIRED BY THE SERVER STAFF
Capitalists finding profit in capitalists
you would enjoy and glad that I'm not that right to support racism and slavery everyday
Minecraft how's life in Taipei?
not pretty bad I never been to Taipei
Exactly
Do you live in Chongqing?
Epic horsey leader no way
š
nah I live in Jinan
No she lives in a Kunming suburb
I MEANT NANJING BTW
I thought sheās he
Jinan is the capital of the province of Shandong in East China. With a population of 9.2 million, it is one of the largest cities in Shandong in terms of population. The area of present-day Jinan has played an important role in the history of the region from the earliest beginnings of civilization and has evolved into a major national administra...
Because of the sister Hong incident
alright then they I guess
Do you know about the sister hong incident, Minecraft
He/she/they/gay
never heard of it
ā
Is it nice?

just fine I ever been to a lot of countries
I live in Jilu
I will finally get to America
Hell nah
The Nanjing Sister Hong incident (Chinese: å京红å§äŗä»¶; pinyin: NĆ”njÄ«ng hóng jiÄ shƬjiĆ n) is a scandal that emerged in July 2025 involving a 38-year-old man surnamed Jiao (Chinese: ē¦; pinyin: JiÄo) from Nanjing, China, who allegedly posed as a woman, "Sister Hong" (Chinese: ēŗ¢å§; pinyin: Hóng JiÄ; lit. 'Sister Red'), and has ...
I don't give a shit to civil issues
Why not? Don't they affect you as a chinese citizen?
-
A report's** "clear words"** do not eliminate the need for interpretation.
Islamic law has never been derived solely from one report. Prophetic practice, Qur'anic principles, context, and corroboration are all important.
Because of this, there has historically been disagreement among jurists regarding apostasy, including whether or not there is any punishment in this world -
The "changing philosophy" of the Qur'an does not imply that killing for religious reasons is acceptable
Like alcohol, gradual legislation focuses on social regulation rather than conscience-based punishment.
The Qur'an does not prescribe any human punishment for those who believe, disbelieve, and then believe again.
From a methodological standpoint, that is important. -
In Islamic law, "God will judge" is a legal boundary rather than a catchphrase.
Islamic law makes a distinction between crimes decided by courts and sins judged by God.
The Qur'an consistently places belief in the former category. -
Regarding zindiq/zanadiqa You are correct that the term encompasses more than just "rebel." In the past, it was used to describe individuals who were accused of politically and publicly undermining Islam
these individuals were frequently dualists, , or secret groups thought to be causing social unrest.
That's exactly the point: it wasn't "someone who privately stops believing," but rather a political-theological category.
Modern atheism as a personal identity is not equivalent to classical usage. -
Lastly, even proponents of punishment in classical law never permitted vigilante murder. It is already more in line with historical treason law than belief policing because it was always presented as a state matter with courts, evidence standards, and barriers. Therefore, portraying this as **"Islam commands Muslims to kill apostates" **is still oversimplified and ignores legal theory, juristic disagreement, and the primacy of the Qur'an.
I don't care because that doesn't affect me
How does it not affect you if you live in MainLand China
Have you heard of the toad president
Hi
if they didn't reach the scale of influence that does surpass Jeffery Epstein I would ignore
even Jeffery Epstein wasn't that huge
the administration could hold it off
so you love smaller issues, got it
Can a non-native speaker reach higher than c1?
Why not?
@sturdy mango why did you "š" me?
Idk I heard someone say the highest a non-native speaker can reach is c1 and you would have to move to an English speaking country or be born in an English speaking country to reach c2
No
It's over
Learn another language
yes, in fact, a lot of native speakers don't reach c2 unless they have higher education
around 10% of native speakers are c2
then almost everyone else is c1
I tried taking a c2 test before, the only thing I understood was the word "the"(jk but you get the idea, it's really freaking hard)
how did it look like
I don't remember but I just answered 5 questions(all wrong probably) then just gave up and went to doom scrolling for the next century or so
and that's where you made your mistake
?
Nah, all the questions were words I didn't understand, so for the choice options too
No I just closed the whole test
Coward
do you have an example phrase? do you still have the test somewhere and is it free?
yes coward
I don't remember what test it is but yeah it was free
ikjgvfcxcvhjmhgxsdhnhjhjjjjjjjjvc
I WANT TO CHECK IT OUT š
If you want to test your English I recommend EF set test(not the c2 test but it's pretty good+it's free and accessible+it's actually humanily possible)
I was scared to summon Satan by accident
Cause let me tell ya, that shi wasn't English
relax
Or what?
jorking my peanits
I love languages! I really want to learn this old anglish!
Hmmm I couldn't care less
real
These brits are just making up hard words to feel special ong ong
they are allowed to do that since they came up with the language in the first place š
It's not like muricans are not doing it either
pacifier vs dummy for example
Aww the cutie patotie fell for the rage bait
dummy is the first word
Yeah they wanna feel better than the rest of us(at least I am not scared of getting a 9 inch knife inside of me, like they are)
I've got no time for that
Well, at least the brits are not scared of being shot by an ice agent, like the americans are
I am Egyptian
tho
There's a shorter 15 mins one
ty ill come back in 15 minutes
Btw mid test you'll feel terrible and like you never learned English and you will get a2 result but don't worry you didn't mess up you're fine
Which test is it???
Scroll up
@opal surge
It doesn't actually take that time cause you don't actually have to finish it in 90 minutes, 90 minutes is just the celling you can't go above but you can finish it in like 20 minutes if you're fast and good enough
Nooooo, tell me the name please
Or just share the site, I'd be super grateful
EF set test, there's 90 minutes or 50 minutes or 15 minutes, btw that time Is only the celling, you can finish it in less than quarter the time if you're fast enough and good enough
@real lily
Tysmmmmmm!!! Be right back in 15 minutes
The More time the more accurate btw
Like the 15 mins got me b1-b2 but the 50 mins got me c1
Enter fake name, burner Gmail, fake year, number not needed, any country
i already closed the site
Haha, I think the test was actually quite easy š
Btw the 50 mins one you can do it only once per 90 days and the 90 day one only.... Once in your existence, it hardware bans you even with vpn or anything
Yeah the short test is quite easy
Jokes aside, there were some hard questions, but I think that I managed
Take the 50 or 90 minute one, very worth it
I took the 90 minutes one and got c1
I got a lot of questions regarding a university
Not now
I want to play games vro
Yeah they like neutral topics
Yeah sure loser(jk live your life man)
I rearranged the furniture in my room and honestly I feel much more relaxed right now
Hi
bi
Sure
Nope never heard of it
I'm almost at the end
Did you watch the movie Matilda from 1996?
It's based on this book
the story is a little different though
Take the 90 minutes one, at your level it's very worth it
Tysm! I'll try
Good luck
I'm tempted to give the 15 minutes test again and try for a perfect score
Don't, a waste of time
Just go for the 90 minutes one
Read questions don't just go straight to answers like I did on the 50 minute one
Okay okay
I messed up
I don't know where I went wrong though, I think my bad memory made me lose in the questions where it'd just BOMBARD me with spoken info
I forgot a lot of stuff that it'd say even if I understood it
Wdym your score is c2 proficient
But I know I got some questions wrong
so what
So that affects the grade
but the grade is still c2 proficient\
Mid
Yes, but it's 75
so what
Jk you did great, be proud
Thank you, xyz
Np king
ššššš YOU WERE BEING PRODUCTIVE
haha
I wasted my time doing silly quizes
it was in english too
Which book were you reading
not really, doing quizzes is fun and actually gives you confidence and slightly increases your comprehension
Matilda by Roald Dahl
i think i want to play games now
i'm gonna hop in between voice chats and play my game in the background bye
Ooh wow, it's such a good book, I just spoiled it for myself by reading a sweet summary, it sounds like a very good storyline
Have a good time reading
Or playing games, whatever you end up doing
Because of this, there has historically been disagreement among jurists regarding apostasy, including whether or not there is any punishment in this world
Can you give any examples of older scholars reject the apostasy death penalty?
The Qur'an does not prescribe any human punishment for those who believe, disbelieve, and then believe again.
From a methodological standpoint, that is important.
Islamic jurisdiction does not only rely on Quran, Hadiths are taken into account as well.
In Islamic law, "God will judge" is a legal boundary rather than a catchphrase.
Islamic law makes a distinction between crimes decided by courts and sins judged by God.
The Qur'an consistently places belief in the former category.
These categories can be implicit, but since there is a Hadith that clearly states apostates should be killed, then it puts into something that can be punished in this life.
That's exactly the point: it wasn't "someone who privately stops believing," but rather a political-theological category.
Modern atheism as a personal identity is not equivalent to classical usage.
When you say it's a theological category that basically means that it's a punishment that's used against those who are theologically different. There's nothing such as old or new atheism, and the law doesn't only apply to atheists, the apostasy death penalty is used against anyone who leaves Islam regardless of their new religion/philosophy. And both the texts and the scholars did not distinguish between just believing in something different and rebelling against the state.
Lastly, even proponents of punishment in classical law never permitted vigilante murder
I never claimed it permitted vigilante murder.
Therefore, portraying this as "Islam commands Muslims to kill apostates" is still oversimplified
It's not. You basically say that apostates should be executed, therefor you are saying apostates should be killed. It's still oppressing people and killing them.
Helloe
Sure
What's something you often think about these days?
Future
Or the past
Hello šŗ
1. Abū Ḥanīfa (50 AH)
did not view apostasy as a crime in and of itself.
He:
completely rejected the execution of female apostates
Punishment based on political disobedience rather than a shift in beliefs
This is crucial: disbelief was not the only reason for punishment, even in those cases
- Islamic law makes use of Hadith and the Qur'an.
However, usūl al-fiqh enforces rules of hierarchy and interpretation.
Apostasy is mentioned several times in the Qur'an, but it is never punished in this world, even when:
"They believe, disbelieve, then believe once more." (Q 4:137)
a) The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, never executed Muslims who left Islam unless they were a threat
b) The Prophet Muhammad imposed death on those who betrayed him and/or shifted allegiances during war (or engaged in hostile rebellious activity against his authority)
c) The other hadiths prescribe execution for rebellion against the Muslim community, not for changing religion
Thus, many scholars classify apostasy as a rebellion in the same category of crime as įø„irÄbah (rebellion), and not as a mere crime against God.
-
Traditionally:
Ridda does not equal Private Disbelief.
Ridda means a public departure from Loyalty to a State.
Breaking your Oath
Joining the Enemies of Your State
Endangering a State with an Emerging and Fragile Political Structure
This is because:
There has not been a Private worldview of Atheism prior to the 20th century.
Identity, Law, and Loyalty were closely linked.
You are correct that the Law applied regardless of the new faith, but it was not your New Belief that caused Suspension of the Law; it was your Public Departure from the State and the Threat you posed to the State. -
They did, although they didn't do so perfectly. Evidence for this is as follows: there was no punishment for secret apostasy,
there was no punishment for women (per Abū Ḥanīfa),
and there was no execution of the apostate until they publicly declared their apathy, or were unwilling to accept reconciliation, or had caused perceived harm to society.
If belief was the only thing being punished, then none of the aforementioned distinctions would exist. -
The statement,** "Islam commands that all Muslims kill apostates,**" is incorrect for several reasons:
- It lacks an individual command,
-It is not universally applicable, - There is no abortion of apostasy.
- These distinctions are substantial and serve to clarify the law as well as provide a proper understanding of its meaning.
Hello
Who's leader art thou?
Abu Hanifa did not reject the apostasy death penalty, he just framed it political. He and the followers of the Hanafi Madhab suppose that leaving the religion in of itself is an act of political defiance, he supposes the shift itself imply that.
My question was "Can you give any examples of older scholars reject the apostasy death penalty" and that certainly not it. If you think I'm wrong here you can quote the man.
IbnHishÄm's "SÄ«rat RasÅ«l AllÄh" includes many examples of people (including ŹæAbdullÄh ibn Ubayy) who acted against the Muslims, but they were not executed simply for leaving their religion.
Al-BukhÄrÄ« had an established rule that it was only in instances where apostasy was coupled with murder, fighting the Muslims, or aiding their enemies that one would be executed by the Prophet ļ·ŗ, not merely for changing one's belief.
The Qur'Än itself mentions apostasy, but at no point indicates that there is a penalty imposed for it in this life (2:256; 4:136). This leads us to continue to view changing one's belief alone as not deserving of a death penalty. Historical documentation also highlights ŹæUmar b. ŹæAbd al-ŹæAzÄ«z had a preference for imprisoning an apostate instead of executing him; it helps establish the separation of apostasy from the commission of a crime.
As a result of these examples, it is clear that early Islam did not mandate the death penalty for apostasy.
Abdullah ibn Ubayy was not publicly an apostate, it was claimed that he was a Munafiq "hypocrite" but he publicly converted to Islam. I know this because I listened to the Egyptian Islamic history scholar Raghib al-Sirgani lectures on the Sirah.
Here's what the Wikipedia article says:
Abd-Allah ibn Ubayy (Arabic: Ų¹ŲØŲÆ Ų§ŁŁŁ ŲØŁ Ų£ŲØŁ ŲØŁ Ų³ŁŁŁ, died 631), also called Ibn Salul in reference to his grandmother, was a chief of the Arab tribe Banu Khazraj and one of the leading men of Medina (then known as Yathrib). Upon the arrival of Muhammad, Ibn Ubayy became a Muslim, but the sincerity of his conversion is disputed. Because of repeated conflicts with Muhammad, Islamic tradition has labelled him a munafiq or hypocrite (plural: munafiqun) and "leader of the munafiqun".[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_Allah_ibn_Ubayy#
Abd-Allah ibn Ubayy (Arabic: Ų¹ŲØŲÆ Ų§ŁŁŁ ŲØŁ Ų£ŲØŁ ŲØŁ Ų³ŁŁŁ, died 631), also called Ibn Salul in reference to his grandmother, was a chief of the Arab tribe Banu Khazraj and one of the leading men of Medina (then known as Yathrib). Upon the arrival of Muhammad, Ibn Ubayy became a Muslim, but the sincerity of his conversion is disputed...
I asked you for quotes and you brought none, in addition to the absence of any sources for these claims.
These are the lectures I referred to.
https://audio.islamweb.net/audio/index.php?page=lecview&sid=985&lg=547
ŲµŁŲŲ© Ų§ŁŲ“ŁŲ® Ų±Ų§ŲŗŲØ Ų§ŁŲ³Ų±Ų¬Ų§ŁŁ ŁŲ¹Ų±Ų¶ Ų§ŁŁ ŲŲ§Ų¶Ų±Ų§ŲŖ ŁŲ§ŁŲÆŲ±ŁŲ³ Ų§ŁŁ ŲŖŲ¹ŁŁŲ© ب٠ج٠ŁŲ¹Ų© Ų³ŁŲ³ŁŲ© Ų§ŁŲ³ŁŲ±Ų© Ų§ŁŁŲØŁŁŲ© Ų Ł Ų¹ Ų„Ł ŁŲ§ŁŁŲ© Ų§ŁŲ§Ų³ŲŖŁ Ų§Ų¹ ŁŲŖŲŁ ŁŁ Ų§ŁŁ ŁŲ§ŲÆ Ų§ŁŲµŁŲŖŁŲ©Ų ŁŁŲ±Ų§Ų”Ų© Ų§ŁŁŲµŁŲµ Ų§ŁŁ ŁŲ±ŲŗŲ©
Oh
I noticed Quran 4:137 wasnāt even cited in full above, so Iām just going to add the full context of everything surrounding it to change from āthey believe, disbelieve, and believe once moreā into the full context.
4:136-4:143
O believers! Have faith in Allah, His Messenger, the Book He has revealed to His Messenger, and the Scriptures He revealed before. Indeed, whoever denies Allah, His angels, His Books, His messengers, and the Last Day has clearly gone far astray.
Indeed, those who believed then disbelieved, then believed and again disbelievedā˹onlyĖŗ increasing in disbeliefāAllah will neither forgive them nor guide them to the ˹RightĖŗ Way.
Give good news of a painful punishment to hypocrites,
who choose disbelievers as allies instead of the believers. Do they seek honour and power through that company? Surely all honour and power belongs to Allah
He has already revealed to you in the Book that when you hear Allahās revelations being denied or ridiculed, then do not sit in that company unless they engage in a different topic, or else you will be like them. Surely Allah will gather the hypocrites and disbelievers all together in Hell.
˹The hypocrites areĖŗ those who wait to see what happens to you. So if Allah grants you victory, they say ˹to youĖŗ, āWere we not on your side?ā But if the disbelievers have a share ˹of victoryĖŗ, they say ˹to themĖŗ, āDid we not have the advantage over you, yet we protected you from the believers?ā Allah will judge between ˹all ofĖŗ you on the Day of Judgment. And Allah will never grant the disbelievers a way over the believers.
Surely the hypocrites seek to deceive Allah, but He outwits them. When they stand up for prayer, they do it half-heartedly only to be seen by peopleāhardly remembering Allah at all
Torn between belief and disbeliefābelonging neither to these ˹believersĖŗ nor those ˹disbelieversĖŗ. And whoever Allah leaves to stray, you will never find for them a way.
Too serious
Idk how the Quran manages to say a lot without much substance.
Did you type all of it or just copied
It has always felt strange to me, even as a kid.
Talent
Copied
What's the main contention?
My eyes got hurt during reading
On a serious note it comes across as a guy forgetting what he said and repeating himself
Lmaooooo
Thanks for mentioning
This chat is too kafr 
#1 Kafr here
You can dislike the Qurāanās style, but that doesnāt change what it actually says and it doesnāt command killing apostates.
ššš
Take me out on it 
What ššš
I didn't claim it does.
I guess we wouldn't reach an agreement here, let's agree to disagree.
I thought you were islamicphobia too
They are a Muslim
I'm muslim š
when did this happen
A Muslim who has islamphobia 
WTF
Phoiba?
soya
soya?
soya
soja
nooooooo

Leaving a belief is like emigrating;
helping an enemy during war is treason
those are not the same things
today was only tge first day after a two day weekend and im already tired and back to crazy
i might as well puke my pill and rest with my wife
People's belief looks like something private no need for everyone to know about their beliefs
I wish more Muslims had this mentality.
Make sense
Wait wrong ping
Leaving a belief harms no one
betraying a community through actions does. Those are not the same
Christianity is no better, honestly
there was some blood but this should do
Toxicity exists in all religious communities though
Blood where?
schizo is a miracle of god
mostly everywhere
Are you schizophrenic?
im joking btw
What do you mean by betraying a community
bro if i was real schizo you would have killed me with the shower thingyš
It's long ahh story , nvm
it was a hallucination
It was YOU
I'm sorry, I shower when I get a brainfog
im not real
i guess it must mire be like burnout rather than brainfog
bro i literally give adviceš
Maybe yeah
Are you a med student or something? š
yes but dont worry i study for hours before doing so

WAIT REALLY? You are a med student? Awesome, Good luck man
nyzas if you dont share stuff, you will drown one day from the weight
I hate studying, studying hurts my brain
wait you thought i was some hippy?
But I also like it when it's not rushed
i see i see
Just not anything from the curriculum
š
I think there are more secular Christians than secular Muslims. They are often in more positions of power in their countries too.
forcing kniwledge never works
Definitely I agree, I also think people associate Islam with extremism more because of this reason
Such leaders rise to power, and in turn radicalise more of their population. Some ideologies of the leaders do reflect on the general population too, that's also probably why there is negative rep around that faith
every society had a peak of their age, doesnt mean you still have to live like that time only. That's a bummer.
I agree, I think studying what you're really good at and passionate about together, is the key. I am passionate about science but I'm not good at it, I do like Maths but that's about it. I've never really liked stuff that's been taught in my class till now
I'm switching to Law major this year and I couldn't be happier
The amount of weight I've had on myself to finish this whole thing altogether was mindboggling. But it's amazing I pulled through, I never thought I had the ability too
i understand
well you are really strong for doing that
Yep, I have huge respect for you all, all the Med students and science students. This is definitely not everyone's cup of tea
Thank you so much, I really appreciate that
no problemo
Why not
i dont know, sometimes overthinking and trying to know more is wrong. You get nothing but pain from it. Though there is a truth behind it.
slay
Wouldn't it be me neither
ŠŠ°Ń Š°Ń Ń Š°Ń Š°Ń Š°Ń Š°Ń Š°Ń
it should be nor me
I see
or me neither
we see
all of us r fascists right
no im a psychopath/sociopath
if u think ur a sociopath or physcopath then ur not
how sure can you be
because a physco or socio wouldnt admit it
sociopath do mostly
bro no sociopath would openly come out and admit theyre one
they r impulsive and manipulative people
but maybe compared to a physco or narc
Damn
A nice topic i see
What makes u think that way?
a sociopath does not understand the emotional aspects of society and individuals. They will need help from others to get into the society.
Thatās an oversimplification
Sociopathy and psychopathy arenāt clinical terms
and people with ASPD can understand emotions and function in society
That's not how morden psychology describes it today
U are talking about the old ones
woah
i guess you are mixing ASPD and schi zoid personality disorder
yeah only in forensic science
No ŁŲ§ŁŲ²ŁŲ±ŲŖ
devil when did we join al-||chilledicecream||
Tf is that?
then where is your supreme leader?
I'm unmuted
Welcome back
Does it worth it to read all the barkings i was pinged to?
Probably not
Only twicee
Oh I'm here for 10 days
I'd be banned in other servers by now
Ah you're right
Just don't say hateful stuff and you'd be mostly fine.
I didn't make you do anything 
Let's blame nale
Those conjuring movies are legit garbage
I love the conjuring universe
I get that part, but the movies themselves?
They're like final destination
There are many movies in conjuring universe some are good some isn't
Conjuring 1 and 2 are good 3 is garbage
4 was funny
The curse of la llorona meh
The nun 1 good 2 ok
Horror of Amityville
Amazing
Annabelle 1 terrible
2 and 3 good
@slender coral Hey, You know we've debated a long time ago on the topic of treating womens as property in islam and you've showed me a hadith too. I've found a Quranic verse which makes it clear.
4:19 Quran
uhh idk how to use the bot
The Women (4:19)
"O believers! It is not permissible for you to inherit women against their willĀ or mistreat them to make them return some of the dowry ˹as a ransom for divorceĖŗāunless they are found guilty of adultery.Ā Treat them fairly. If you happen to dislike them, you may hate something which Allah turns into a great blessing."
Qurāan 4:19 explicitly says women cannot be inherited against their will. Property is inherited; women are not. That verse alone disproves the claim that Islam treats women as property.
Hallo
Okay but this doesnāt define fair treatment or mistreatment.
Inherit? Meaning marry a widow?
Ok so widows canāt be married against their will (unless they commit adultery) but still doesnāt prove anything besides that lmao.
If anything, the idea that you could āinheritā a woman shows the attitude that they are considered property.
From now on I'll only communicate with emojis
Speaking is so mutable these days

I didn't mean that women are literally property in Islam (although they can literally be in slavery), when people state that women are like property in Islam it's mostly metaphorical as in having lesser rights than men and being controlled by them.
it does
How
you know in the past,Before, the practice was that when a man dies, his male relatives used to have the right to do whatever they wanted with his wife. If one of them wants, he would marry her, give her in marriage, or prevent her from marriage, for they had more right to her than her own family. Thereafter, this Ayah was revealed about this practice to stop and the hadith you were referring to does not says that womens should be or are treated as property. It was the time of ignorance. the Disapproval of the Prophet itself discourages.
I think I may not bother answering
It just says to treat them fairly but doesnāt describe fairness
have you read the Quran?
Bits and pieces
you're judging the whole from the bits
Can I judge a criminal by the crime they committed even if I donāt know everything about them?
anyways, I guess it's enough for you to understand. if you insist to argue more, then I may consider you a person who is blind for guidance.
Not very convincing isn't it
Lmao
Does Quran commit to "treat them fairly but doesnāt describe fairness
"? If your Answer is Yes, I think you should reread the Quran
and also show me

famous English Author I've heard
That's Jane Austen the writer, Jane Eyre is basically a novel named after the protagonist of the book itself
my memory is weak lol, I've read about her in my previous class
It claims specifically in the passage you showed to treat specifically inherited widows fairly.
Though I think burden of proof would be an excellent concept to apply. As you are claiming a positive, you would have to show where it defined fair treatment of inherited widows (or a broader category under which inherited widows would apply). The alternative would be me having to show every single line in the Quran.
Also, I was talking specifically about that one line lmao. Youāre using one line out of many in a book, completely divorced from the rest of the book, and claiming it as representative, without addressing any possible contradictions to the claim.
@turbid dome hiya
Hi
Hi there sir
So if I was to give you the criminal record of Jeffrey Epstein and nothing else about him itās unfair for me to judge him?
So if I thought Jeffrey Epstein was bad for child s trafficking you would have an objection?
What about š?
Ngl Iād rather take the bullet
I don't want to get banned
I'll protect you kitten
Property can't own property. The Quran (4:7 and 4:32) gave women the right to own their own money and land. If they were property, that would be legally impossible. Verse 4:19 doesnāt just 'treat widows fairly'. it explicitly bans people from inheriting them.
If you canāt see that banning the inheritance of a person is the opposite of treating them like property, that's a 'you' problem. Iām not going to keep explaining the basics to someone whoās just looking for a fight. Stay stuck if you want, Iām done.
These mods are monsters twin š
What happened š š š š
proves your stupidity
They muted me bc i repeated someone's else slur
While He just got warned

that was very much wasting time with you for nothing. Hope you seek guidance.
Literally 1984
Ong ong
Egg first appeared 320~ million years ago, hens around 90-60 million depending on the definition
It's a group of reptiles that appeared after a mass extinction called Great Dying, they originated in the South of the supercontinent Pangaea. There already were reptiles roaming the planet but they weren't particularly big
The first dinosaurs weren't that big either, other reptiles were filling different roles around the planet
If they bother you again ping me š
Even seju didn't reply
That damn indian 
I think you missed the core of devilās above message.
Property isnāt literal, it means they have lesser rights and are treated as broodmares. By my understanding, slaves have some rights in Islam too, yet slaves are definitionally property.
And it only bans people from inheriting them unwillingly (which ignores societal pressures and is narrow regardless) and still treats them as a thing to be inherited.
Also if you think Iām stupid because I would rather die than make someone live with a lifetime of trauma, good on you lol
I think I can debate with Devil about it. You should go to sleep now. It was waste of time debating with you.
I'll debate on this with Devil later.
James what do you think needs to happen for people in the US to start taking (Actual) action
Depends for what. Americans mostly care about self interest so it would have to harm that
Hasn't that already happened though with rising cost of living and (white) people being denied their rights
Compare that to the third world countries where they exploit people as slaves, and itās not bad enough yet.
What do you mean by actual action 
The white people getting shot is the only thing thatās caused a little bit of unrest
Oh is that so
Protests are useless imo, they're done after work, these people need to go on strikes, halt the economy
I said that like yesterday and they called me racist for attributing race to a cause
Yes, Americans hate sacrificing treats and would rather do āno to thisā
I thought you were talking about iran or middle east 
They shot a Venezuelan an black man before an nobody cared, they only care because these guys are white
Youāre not wrong

Cop is lowkey a chill job in the US
Hardly any education, no fitness requirements, no responsibility if you shoot someone
Especially since dogs and children often can't shoot back
ŲŁŲ§ ŁŁŁŁŲ§ ŁŲ§Ų“ŁŁŁ!!!
The US is a crazy place.
My mom has a cousin who failed to be a cop because theyāre stupid, so they just applied for being a cop at another department
It worked?
Yes
Lol
ššššš
I'm gonna say Syria is more crazy because what the fuck is that š
they could be pretty usefull
action is not always good
More of Ų·ŁŁŲ± Ų¬ŁŁŁ
Read this to know what I mean

They are coming to erbil lmao i need to escape
Did you vote for trump mr james
read the essay I posted
Is that zazuuuuu
@lavish finch Lets invade India
Why India
Easy to invade⦠no one wanna reconstruct the society
Thatās the whole problem of todayās society
help I just joined this server while seriously expecting it to be normal lol
hi
it is normal
? t
Whatās your favorite holiday movie?
What TV show character would it be the most fun to change places with for a week?
?t
If you could have an all-expenses paid trip to see any famous world monument, which monument would you choose?
Do you think that humans will ever be able to live together in harmony?
How much do you plan for the future?
but
if i point out
doesnt that make me racist, even if i was about to be right
Do it
There is some people are doomed to be bad forever me and u know them dw 
ive seen so many videos of people getting shot
What they are doing isnāt right
how do you know we are on the same track
Enlighten me then
do you think hate is something people choose or feel
This is sick
where do you think i am from
Both someone can choose to hate someone and sometimes hate can come from something that happened to you
I agree
I have no idea again plz be clear
i didnt mean much with that, what i meant to say is that from what part u are of the world probably affects your way of thinking
so we might not see the world with the same eyes
Why are u running from the question ?
I am kurdish
no i was abt to answer lol
sh says the same as the post above I think
I am Tunisian
yh ik i saw u write it
no i wanted you to reflex on the part where u said me and u know them
maybe i see u as the bad one for example
I mean whatās happening there are they deporting people who have legit papers or immigrants
š
or you me as one
who is good and who is bad
idk just some questions that i cant stop thinking about
Ahhh okay itās clear from the tag
People who hurt innocent people are bad
what tag
In the profile
totally agree, but i dont think thats something all eyes can see even if it obvious
hola amigos
u mean the depressed part ig
what religion are we dissing today?
hola chicka
Depression 
Where plz show me
in my bio uhh huh
Yeah some people are sick as I said
no religion ig
but seems like ur muslim bc of that symbol or am I delusional
I am talking about me my profile not u 
Oh LOL
What symbol 
the moon symbol she has on her profile
I am muslim but there is no symbol
in islam?
We donāt have symbols and we donāt need them
ur right we dont have a symbol
What
idk how that moon thingy became a symbol when it is not
What's this then āŖļø
idk
i think it is bc of some nations that had that one on their flags and they were muslim
like ottoman idk
Has nothing to do with us
as an ambassador of islam āāŖļøā has everything to do with islam
Are you Sunni I don't trust yall when it comes to Islamic questions
good question actually idk
Itās how we count months
ohh smart
i mean we all recognise the symbol when we see it
but originally it is not a symbol of islam
Gonna ask a real Islamic scholar
nah as ambassador of islam, it is
Why are u shi3a ?
cus u corrupted the whole religion
whats your question akhi
i have answers
@high raven Is āŖļø the symbol of Islam
shias are the originals
why a star next to it
Keep dreaming
are u iraqi
Bro says this while sunni countries pay jizya to the US
100%
what ignorance š
"Shia's kill other Muslims" meanwhile these guys prop up the US defence budget by buying their weapons
My country doesnāt so stop saying stupid lies
why u asking a christian, dont u got muslim friends
Say wallah with 2 L's that I'm lying?
Let her be
Is Saudi Arabia a sunni country or not
Sunni but here is the catch I am not from there and I donāt agree what they do with their money because they are corrupted
i currently dont see any islamic country that can represent islam
No but also yes kind of
neither do i think their practicer are right but saudi arabia is getting better by time
Amazigh u mean ?
exactly they kinda made it one but still it is not
it is akhi
Do you think it's hypocrisy for the gatekeepers of Mecca and Medina to buy weapons from the same guys bombing Gaza
sheikh sanna has spoken
yes i thought languagewise it is called with a t and then if u speak arabic like then its called darija
This is now discord hadith
I can speak darija
shes not responsible for the actions of nations especially other nations just bc shes sunni
write ts down
š
Back to the generalization 
HMMM CURIOUS, but somehow us Shia are responsible for what a few do? š¤š¤š¤
now when u got ur information checked i hope u understand 
dont generalise, i dont think that
Saudi had Cardi B twerking in the land of "Tawheed" btw
Yes it is but mecca and Medina has nothing to do with them because it was made for us muslims but they have turn it into business
i think muslims should learn to respect each other
It was Iggy Azalea brother š¤¢š¤¢š¤¢
Shame wlh shame
true the amount thats needed to do hajj is just sick
If we respect our religion we will be good
Yes millions
yes and we show respect to it by our actions as well as the way we think
if a poor muslim cant do hajj then its on saudi idk how they are thinking
wallah astagfirullah but even the jews can go to ishell for free but muslims cant provide each other fairly
Of course
The issue is Arabs not Muslims
Even how they are treated there is not normal
Whatās the silliest thing youāve seen someone get upset about?
I took the place of a girl in classroom 
lets say shes middle eastern
Nah sheās from the west
is it racist if she says it as someone from the west
and would it be different if she was middle eastern
Kinda stereotyping u know
Than sheās stupid
My parents are from Lebanon but I live in Norway yes
yh i see, especially if you dont have much knowledge
you identify as arab right? @open vault
So ur parents are bad ?
or differently
No š I am Tunisian from north Africa
I have no idea about my roots
understandable since they conquered north africa and such
There's other ethnicities besides Arab
But I donāt understand why people hate on a full culture whole ethnicity
i wasnt hateful till januari started⦠now i am at least trying to avoid the maybe slight hate i haveā¦
Can i say that the ethnicity of ur parents is bad ?
do you think Palestinians like jews
Yeah being hateful is bad
if continuesly seeing people violate your people in the name of their background or religion, wouldnt that force hate from you
No because if I was in there place I wouldnāt like it if someone come and kicked me out my house
exactly, so why do you think people hate arabs?
It would yes
Even if generalising is wrong
Whatās the realtion between arab and whatās happening with Palestine?
before januari i couldnt think that way. I would say the correct answer is no, you cant hate. jews, muslims or arabs bc it is wrong and generalising
but if you have experience, then it just doesnt work in the logical way
i gave u an example
Babe being Jewish is fine but being israeli no
for example kurds dont like arabs bc they are doing stuff, in the name of god or arabhood
yes but when u are hurt u dont think this way
Yes of course, might be hard to pinpoint why though, we don't have the equivalent of Arabization and persecution
And simply think as something u wouldnāt like for yourself u wouldnāt do it for the other
We can pinpoint dw just tell where they are from and what do u mean by persecution give an example
Ur iman has nothing to do with arabs
Itās between u and god
does it change the fact that u can get affected by stuff
Do u have the same issues with westernization?
hell no
Of course but itās between u and god
Arameans from Lebanon. By examples do you mean ethnicities that Arabs have persecuted? Arameans, Kurds, Amazigh, Copts, Nubians, Jews, Yazidis, Maronites to name a few
Yes, it's not forced though, that's the difference
yes i didnt deny it, but i mention fate as an example of why people hate
Okay here u are not correct 
Give me details why this happened and if the arabs attacked them without any reason I will say that group is bad but not the whole ethnicity
Not sure what you mean, how is it forced?
just a check: hola are u still here?
Yeah I understand u
Excuse me ? Do u thing whatās happening now itās happening in a normal way
wdym, for example why do u think they went to north africa
What are you referring to?
Have u heard of capitalism and what the USA did to it make word-wide system ?
They brought islam
i know generalising is not correct and you should avoid it but you have to understand other people as well or why they feel that way
And they went through war like any other group of people who wanted to spread his religion
U are entitled to feel whatever u want I canāt do nothing about it but spreading hate is not cool and acting upon it

I am sorry but ā she said hola como esta ā 
Sunnies in iraq didn't feel that way when isis attack us
Do you know why ? Because they are aware that wasn't the true Islam nor the righteous people to lead it
You don't have to question your beliefs based on heretical groups or extremist
In this case even christians would drop their religion because of crusaders
ya hussain
Ya ali
She brought her brother in kofer 
you cant forcefully convert people in war
If thatās the case sheās asking Hola how he is 
Thatās what happened before thatās the history
I said konishiwa š I am doing good and u
Imma sleep she stopped replying to Sanna this is no longer interesting šš»
i am saying it is a feeling. well sunnities in iraq are arab too. and most of the isis were either iraqi or syrian, then u focus hate on what sect they are, are both sunni? then you continue to the branch, what do you realise, oh they are salafi, and then u start hating on that
Yeah Sanna Lost ts
U talking about me ?
sorry my english didnt understand this š
Never ever happened btw
Yes šš»šš»šš»
Ohh man u just wanna hate on something
Nvm
Isis from everywhere even Tunisian unfortunately 
I didnāt respond to her 
Chechen Afghan Uighur .. etc
Everywhere
west hates in midde east. middle east hates in arabs. arabs hate on either shia or sunni, and the more you can remove the title from yourself you keep hating
mostly iraqi and syrian


