#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 846 of 1
well i have my answer im just trying to hole in your concept of it
so you dont have any justification, and you wont he vegan?
arent you willfully being immoral
I actually think there's no justification, I just eat thinking that nature is wild and so am I
Yup I am
I was a vegetarian when I was a teen but then I got all cynical
so you acknowlegde killing animals eating it, and then making the mistake again instead of making better decision? what justifies that?
Thinking "what's the point"
Nothing
I guess I just think more of people instead of animals


well so
as i said
my morality is based on humans well being
Yeah
now why would i base it on just humans?
Cause you taste delicious meat yummy
But animals also kill each other
And god kills all the time
And so should we
Damn this actor is fine
I think that's why the holy trinity works well
God being the law and jesus being mercy
Holy spirit is useless I don't get it
😭
https://youtu.be/TmfVDYucGkY?si=1Vw9uGIdfjcOiNeF
Werner herzog lowkey changed how I view nature
This video is of Werner Herzog in the film "Burden of Dreams." This film is a documentary about the making of Herzog's 1982 film "Fitzcarraldo," which is set in the Peruvian Amazon and is about a rubber baron attempting to portage a steamship to access a new area to exploit the rubber trees. Herzog actually makes this same portage attempt, and a...
are you sure your atheist?
The psychopath thing is debatable tho I'm skeptical
Hmm...
Well we should focus more on actions than words.
- Laws are there but doesn't crime happen all the time?
- it means that religion has failed to guide its followers
- why don't we hold religions and religious leaders responsible for wrong doings their followers commit in the name of it or god?
- read about the life of mohammad or other religious leaders. You may find some absurd stuff about them.
- religions are man-made so does the objective morality in it.
You'll only find the objective morality of the era that religion was formed in.
I am, I just like thinking about different perspectives
if everyone is decided by god, then the kids who get cancer is also decided by god?
There's no psychopath is the dsm 5
Probably yea
But they believe they suffer for a reason
God has a plan and all that bs
if god is allknowing then we dont have free will everything is decided
what kind of plan has a kid go thru cancer?
and how is that a moral plan
Yeah there's like a billion contradictions in religion
God thinks in ways we can't even grasp 😁
your silly
How about kids getting graped?
Seriously they can cope with any narrative
you're*
What's the plan
That's what they say bro lol
do you believe in karma
Can a kid's karma be this heavy to get graped?
And if God knows it all why did he kept watching a kid getting SA?
Is god a voyeur?
Is it better to believe that a kid is facing unimaginable suffering for no reason or because their heavenly father has a plan for them? Idk man people believe in whatever to cope with life's absurdism
"she asked for it by wearing a short skirt"
😭
A diaper
You mean the 70 year old ones ?
They wear diapers too
no
And there are cases of them being graped
I know lol it's not considered a mental illness, more of a personality trait. It can be mesured with the psychopathy checklist created by the biggest reference in psychopaths Robert D Hare
like women in 30s who wear short skirt and guys say "she asked for it by wearing that short skirt"
If good knows it all the future as well and everything is predecided.
Then why would he let his prophet marry a girl child lol
If God knew how pedophilia will be seen in near future :/
first of all why does god need prophet, cant he jsut come by himself and define quran
God doesn't know arabic. Oh wait...
Cuz it’s all fake stuff
Well there's this question like are they actually a psycopath or just a straight white male profiting over his given power? But that's a question for the woke people
God does not exist because there’s no any direct proof or any case under direct observation that effectively demonstrate its existence
I would never worship a man ok
wow
whats wrong with me?
There’s no freaking God and the fictional story of the Bible or Quran is all human made for mind control and ideology indoctrination to establish their regime based on the total scam
That’s the reality
Thank you lmao I don't know why 4 atheists are debating as if we were religious
i thought someone here was for all eqaulity 
Nothing personal bro
I really think humans need an update in the system.
The god need to step up his game.
Or either god is so naive god doesn't know how to run the world?
Equality is an ideal
We gotta work with what we have
then start by worshipping me
🥺
We both worship each other then
i have prophecies
wouldnt that be like boot licking eachother
dih riding
It's not less of debating more of brushing up on each other's concepts i would say.
(I still ain't atheist if you count me in)
cus
What
man are powerful
no
back in days men used to go to huntings while women take care of kids
That's a myth, women also did hunting
God you guys really need to read feminist theory
i doubt that
thats just propaganda by feminist

Dude that's standard fact
That's actually years of research
Look it up yourself
Imagine 9 year old baby girl* sharing bed with ~55 year old dude who already had tons of wives but still thinking he's a god-man
The only species which is matriarchal are the gorillas
Thought we were talking about humans
imagine tons of wifes

consentually*
That's really common if you don't go 50/50, just another way for a couple to handle their combined financial situation
I think women are always the primary caregivers because they breastfeed and just end up having more contact with the baby
But I don't think it should rely purely on a gender, we should share everything equally. We both work, we both take care of the house
That's my point, gorillas are one of the few species that live together and are matriarchal, unlike human societies, which are patriarchal
you got that right
preach it sista
I think some stuff settled naturally.
Initially it wasn't meant to oppress women.
Isn't the latter part the norm where yall live
Can't relate tbh
but back in that days men were breadwinners and women were caregivers
you cant deny that
Terms and conditions apply
It's a third world country if men aren't forced by law to take parental leave
i have lived like 20 years of my life, i havent opress any women
I don't see why that'd be wrong tbh, lost of bums who dip the moment their wife gives birth
There's archeolotical data bro just look it up, there's a bunch of research that proved that women were active in the hunting
Besides that whats your point
Yo you're the guy I called a potential rpist
sure give me the facts
Wyd here still
"potentially"
and also i have been on earth for 20 years havent graped anyone 
Not yet
I have 20 years of data and evidence that i havent graped, and you calling me potentially grapist is like calling a women who has been on earth for 20 years potential rapist as well
https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.13914
Do i actually have to share it for you to believe bro
Ppl say that? Jesus
Cope buddy you put yourself in that situation
That's so violent
what is saed?
Pro tip: Don't say "neglible clothing" if you don't want to be called that irl
cope what lmao
i can say whatever the fk i want
Good boy 
(If that's true)
You're from sweden thats why
i wonder on what evidence of data, you made up that 100% aboslute percentage, and pls dont say potentially
ill look it up
Hell yeah bro
Brazil, I think it's the 3rd country in the world who commits more feminicide
you end up going on potential
😭 thats not 100% buddy
Jorjor wel
potentially your a grapist as well @fresh flower
BRAZIL CAMPEA DU MUNDO 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🦅🦅🦅🦅⚽️⚽️⚽️💃💃💃💃💃
Jag talar inte svenska men jag vilja 😔
I did a swedish course but the guy stopped uploading
So I have a shitty swedish
I'm not the one saying "Neglible clothing" like it's a debuff
george orwell and me was born in the same state
You're the second Brazilian I run into on here that was learning Swedish😭
as i said: potentailly everyone is
Bergman was!!!
No way
The big brother was watching both of y'all
Dang they used to want to learn norwegian
sadly he died before i was born
Holy peak
He's on our 200 SEK bill and very few know who he is
Bergman is the reason I wanted to learn swedish
Snus
Serious chat does not look serious
you missed
Not a lot of people like art european nihilist raging atheist cinema
But I do
Damn
wait are you atheist or anti-theist
im fan of hot women
So Im a wanna be religious who simply cannot believe
And I suffer from the hole of abscence of meaning that religion left in my life
you have a non believe in god or just against the belief of god
Dude it's actually so bad but it's literally a no-brainer if you're a student or if you've just recently moved in and need to buy furniture (I used to work there)
and tf is bergman
That's how pop divas fans are talking about their idols
i was a anti-theist then i changed it to atheism
Ingmar Bergman was a swedish filmmaker. He did one of the besr films in cinema's history: Persona (1966)
currently im atheist agnostic
I used to be a film nerd
any movie before 1990s is just so bad at cinematography and screenplay
Yeah that's his most famous I guess but not the best
What.
Yeah this guy is just ragebaiting
The quality just degrades
Just say you have bad taste
sure you can believe in a lie
What movies before 90s you watched?
Lmao
There's a lot of deranged takes in this channel but I think this takes it, congratulations if anything
He nailed it
Gave his worst opinion
sure but I have tried watching movies before that decade, and it just doesn't make sense to me, I have this personal hypothesis but movie Renaissance took after 1990s
Hi guys
Would be lynched by the Letterboxd crowd
What's the best film you've watched?
Hello 👋🏻
U are giving me 2020 vibe
I think some letterboxd people would even agree they're kinda performative bosses
i counldnt stand more the then few movies before the 1990s they have bad colour grading, direction, and acting and after getting used to movies of 2010s i cant stand watching it
Again, I'm curious to see what you watched
3:10 to yuma
the hateful 8
the revenant
A taranrino film, of course
What
One battle after another is one of your favourite films?
I watched 30 minutes of it and had enough 😭
I wish I read Thomas Pynchon to understand all that sexual stuff like what the fuck
damn
metacritic gave it 90% metascore
Fuck it
three billboards at ebbington , missouri
What films before the 90s you watched and desliked?
I liked the revenant.
That horse scene was unexpected but I liked it
I hated this with all my gut
I don't really trust reviews on media, they gave Death Stranding a 6.8 but when I played it it's one of the best games I've ever played
except hollywood, i like japans Kiyoshi Kurosawa and koreas Kim-KI duks
im not talking abotu user ratings
Who gave it 6.8
Who even cares about ratings
and no death strandign got pretty good metascrore
me
Ikr
IGN
Ign hire fucking boomers to test things they don't even like
not one review
yeah deathstraning for like 82 on metacritic
Death Stranding 2: On The Beach
got 89
im excited for marty supreme, hamnet, and the testament of ann lee.
gonna relese in few months
Hamnet seems good
he truly is the revenant
Where are you from guys?
But there's no way those films are better then old films
84 on metascore
Not for being old
I don't care 😭
I just love Jessie Buckley and Shakespeare
i dont like old films for 3 things, direction, colour gradieng and actin
Ironic thing is that you go for critic and yet dismiss them
If you ask the standard best director, best actor etc it will be someone from the 20th century
i watched 213 movies past year
Best actor I think it's Marlon Brando
well thats another reason
Best director it would be Orson Wells
I don't agree with neither but yk
Idk how you can make such huge generalization I think you just don't like old things lol
Maybe you struggle to connect
why dont you both reply me?
Cause we're talking about something else
And there's always the question about where we are from
We're tireddd
What's the point of knowing where we live when you don't even know anything about us
Critics back then didn’t really know what directing could grow into if you set a movie from the 1950s next to one from 2020 they’re different creatures entirely techniques pacing visual language all of it but critics in the 50s were judging films by the limits and expectations of their own time so when something felt like the best effort possible back then they handed out perfect scores thats why so many older films sit pretty with 100 while modern movies despite being more complex and ambitious get picked apart standards didnt just rise honey they multiplied and that aint nostalgia thats just how time works
someones feeling leftout
I just want to know which country you are from, so I can tell my friends that I have a friend from that country.
Poor guy 😭
Buddy......
Even critics nowadays would pick older masters. And theater is one of the oldest arts, it's being going for thousands of years
And I think you dismiss how much art is "recycled", artists reference other artists, take inspiration and so on
I'm sorry 😔
That's precisely why I hated it. "Feminist" movie written and directed by a man? You gotta be joking
Tell me what's wrong with it, rather than just telling me it's directed by males, because now you just sound like a mysandrist
Well he knows what's good for his people
I hope the EU pulls through with the €93bn tariffs and don't cave like they did last time
i love sean bakers filmography, Anora, Red Rocket, and The Florida Project
I think masters exist in all ages, dismissing them for their time is just irrational to me. I get it that you have more resources now but techonology solely does not make a good film. Good films are rooted in good writing and that is timeless
How saying that a "feminist" movie directed by a man is a joke is mysandrist?
You're just being sensitive now
Maybe he's a good man
ICE increased their raids on cities with strong democratic party stronghold. coincidence? or revenge?
im asking, tell me smth of substance from the movie that makes the movie bad?
For example
Books are timeless
Well I don't know about that
He tried to be Fellini but failed. It wasn't funny and he didn't even acknowledge the perspective of his own female character in the film
I can only say what I personally didn't like, I never called it an objectly bad movie
I'm not a critic to affirm that
and im asking why you didnt like
here
you dont have to say what you didn't like about the movie, until you become a critic
ngl but that movie was the most funniest movie from the whole year i laughed so much i cant even tell you
The scene where Anora is being kidnapped by three men felt like woah just slipped into bananas hahaha instead of complete terror from Anora's POV since she could basically be brutally violated
Its ridiculous how he didn't even consider her perspective
i bet dollars to donut one battle after another by paul thomas anderson is gonna win the best motion picture
Plus not my kind of comedy
And the guy was just completely vanished in the final act like what happened? He having no will anymore was so irrational inside the narrative
I wouldn't be surprised, I felt like the movie was made for liberals in the US who hate Trump, that was at least my impression of it from the 30 minutes I watched
Anyway if you want a feminist movie go watch a female filmmaker at least
Agnes Varda or Chantal Akerman are great
Yeah well that's a problem I have, I think I have no sense of humor
I can only laugh at it's always sunny
btw when the script was written of the movie, trump wasnt elected matter of fact it was before elections
well its subjective
I heard that it was worked on for 20 or so years but I refuse to believe it
The same goes for Megalopolis
The script was based of vineland from Pynchon and they literally missed the point of the novel which was about mind control only to produce an empty action film that they didn't even know how it was going to end
Pretty empty film and the liberal discourse just annoys me
Trying to speak with the working class cause it's trending 😁
im into humours like, Easy A, Booksmart, Fired Up, Pulp Fiction
Jesus christ
hell naw
who told you that
Lightbulb idea to cast Dicaprio for it, a know non-rich person
guess who directed megalopolis
While hanging out with Bezos?
I know that Coppola did, it doesn't change that the movie was garbage
I swear I watched a seven hour film once and didn't got as bored as in Megalopolis
That film was so bad
I recently watched Avatar 3 too, it was also bad, a know "great" director doesn't make up for it
How are we the almost the same age and I feel like a grumpy old lady next to you
For sure
Epic
i gave it 3.5
PTA is also a great director but One Battle was just shitty
😭
Why this song is so underrated
which one you liked?
I love the ones he did with Daniel Day Lewis, specially Phantom Thread. Such a sophisticated one
i actually loved the cinematography in that
Me with any song by Léon
there will be blood
It's okay
No I'm talking about Echoes of you by Mythic melodys
havent watch phantom thread
It's a romance
I loved every second of it
he kinda looks thn in that movie for some reason
you liked lean the porfessional 💀
What is happening
Lol
ig its emma
Cinephile talk
Yes you both 💀💀💀
What's that
Don't even tell me 😭 jjst ruined my sleep
I really did, but I'm talking about Léon, a Swedish pop-artist
We're talking about films
licorice pizza is also good but not peak
by pta
Does he sing in swedish or english?
Ohhh I can't participate then, I don't watch them that much
Dating a minor 😁
Lol how did he even proceeded with that
Epic awesome train is late
English! The majority of Swedish pop artists sing in English to reach a bigger audience
Same goes for Norwegian
btw there was some user criticisms saying the movie exploited underage natelie portman wiht pervy shorts wiht her mini clothes or smth shit
That's why we swedish learners can never get immersion 😔
Criticism is always welcomed
i want her reaction to it

Yes that's probably true
inherent vice?
and you still liked the film?
Swedish is ass language anyways
Haven't watched it yet cause I wanna read the novel
Lol I think it's sounds so nice
Why?
its a little funny but i didnt liked
I did, been a while since I watched it though
I despise it just bcs I was forced to learn it
Are you finnish?
Yes
Today I encountered a tribe performing a ritual, where a chicken was struck with sticks as part of their sacrificial ceremony
Then it's personal bias.
Not an objectively bad language.
Kentucky flogged chicken
i bet dollars to donut you would like gone girl @sonic lion
My personal opinion is objectively right
Lol loved it. But in the book Amy is so snob
Moomin mugs are great
um i cant simply disagree with that and make it subjective 
Hilarious
I wanted a little snufkin to hang on my backpack
its woman killing a man so thought you would like
Lmfao
Why did you leave provisional council
you love it when a man get tortured, tell me
Banger idea, I'll do it for myself
Only evil men
The good ones can go
would you help good ones?
Nick deserved it he was pathetic
whats the critieria for you to consider a man good?
He owned a bar and watched Adam Sandler like??? Bro you gotta go
so its not even a real guy
And you'll be fine
😭
Lol
am i good guy?
Definitely not
basd on our standard?
😭
Moomins was great
no hesitations
Definitely my favourite character
She's so life affirming
12 years a slave
Dude was always gone
Movies to white people watch and realize slavery was bad
well even i cant watch it
its too painful
Yeah it is
hes literally talking to a raccon
what should i do to be a good guy based on your standards?
He's just like me
Understandable
First you need to read feminist theory bro educate yourself
second?
Same pinch 🤜 🤛

Get better movie taste
third???
Dude
I hate these medicine homeworks
It's a prank!!! I'm prank8ng!!!! Don't worry
still waitin for a constructive criticism

Just imagine you're Victor Frankenstein studying in Geneva to create life from death
I'm too uneducated to know who that is
What do you study
you dont know Frankenstein monster?
Nursing
Incorrect.
That's not how it works, It's like saying 1 + 1 is not equal to 2 because you didn't liked it.
Yooo that's sick
Ohh I read the name wrong💀
Lmao honestly just read the theory, that's actually a good constructive criticism. Then try to be more in contact with different perspectives, be open to novelty and just be a good person, try acting with love, read Rilke
what are my bad quailties
Gonna hit my head to the table soon
I actually meant Victor Frankenstein, the doctor
He was the embodiment of the enlightenment period
noooooo
He was passionate about knowledge and inventions
I need to search meds and give somewhat diagnosis what patient could possibly have
I don't know you well enough plus you shouldn't trust a stranger to tell how you should be
Idk tbh
dw
What's the subject called
He's under your spell
Pharmacology?
Sidetracked but this reminded me of one our first classes in uni where the professor just asked us to prove that 1+1=2
Majored in mathematics?
Honestly that seems crazy for a first day
Yea, I need to learn all these meds and what they do
And how you proved?
Proving something mathematically must be a nightmare
I'm gonna take my first pharma course this semester
It's really hard as they say
Wish u luck 🤞🏻
Applied statistics, 1 and a half years were pure mathematics though
No one did, he just wanted to gauge what we knew
It's not that hard, it's just annoying
And how we'd try to solve what we didn't
I heard pure mathematics is the poetry of maths
I won't change, I just wanted to know a different perception, I change my self bc of a women then I won't be a man then
im being a man by not listening and don't doing what you tell me to do
Cuz u study nursing
I study pharmacy 
Oh ok
maths is just a study of numbers
So you're taking my beautiful advice and doing the opposite? You're the devil
Yea that's little different, try to have fun bcs I can't guarantee that u would
Got it
thats what a man does
😛
Some math don't even have numbers
like?
2 dispirins please
im bored
You're easily bored
So it's everyone from this 1960-
Damn
😭 it was 1990s
We need to sleep
I meant everyone who grew up watching television is easily bored
sorry miss but im better alone
Form 60s till now
Ha ha ha
you might not trust me what i do
while im sleeping
by your own admission im a devil
6???
yes now this is what i call eqaulity
im kinda bored but not sleepy
U both deserved it😭
how serious are you
if its only eqaul im all for it
Some wouldn't like it
do you know damn shawty?
Yea
guess what
No
yes sir
Omg
yessir
That explains everything
sadly i lost all my gifs
That's probably for the best

Neutral ig
Hope she went to sleep
hope not
cus im not sleepy
ikr
are you indian?
so am i
modi doin nun
thats what dicators do
Epic
Modi destroying inside , inviting outsiders to destroy more
this is egying me
fr fuck chinese women
Well what billions of people will do

Mostly using chinese products only
You should be realistic when u talk
Fk this fk that won't help

What u think
Is this even possible
Epic
a lion conern himself for the tiger
That's not possible at all first of all, if u say all people leave their home and go to chinese border
Talking is easy that I'll sacrifice my life for india but ppl won't when it needed
I never said that
That's ur expectations ppl won't do anything plz talk realistic sometimes this shi sounds so idiotic
Modi is ruining india ppl do 3 4 days protest and forget
I am not a minister or smtg

Fine bro
Heo
Not really
emma
How was she misandrist
cus if she gets a change shes gonna walk on me with heels
Lowk deserved
but i cant let this happen, my ego bigger then her heels
I'll just ignore that
so she sleepy?
Probably yes
whose gonna talk to me
Go to sleep
What do you want to talk about?

I'll go skiing soon
send pictures
If I remember
Deadchat
Always is
Trump declared that he will take Greenland because he did not get the nobel prize.
Reasonable crashout
Here is the letter he wrote regarding his feelings.
He now no longer feels an obligation to think only of peace.
He has also initiated a project named The Board of Peace to replace the United Nations.
you understand that Greenland is very strategically and economically important to the United States I assume ?
this is the new territory that you could go through the ocean of your ships into the new route of sailing
who control this region who win the advantage and leverage over the entire global trading system
and who continue to control the whole world
even by the means of war, United States of America must control this region for all interest not only for few capitalists and bureaucrats, but for all of America
this is what it makes America great again
even if they are going to abolish the UN or do anything like go to war with Denmark, they must do that for the country
in this case, for maximize the national interest, support Trump unconditionally should be one of the civil duty as a US citizen
🇺🇸
Minecraft you're Chinese not American
sad xi jinping noises
In reality, if the US were to occupy Greenland, it would be advantageous for China
War with an ally is self sabotage.
Unconditional support is not civic duty.
The constitution places limits on executive power.
It provides for the right and obligation to dissent.
Unconditional loyalty is not patriotism. It is authoritarian logic.
an ally was a diplomatic stance towards another country was for provide the best interest for the country
an ally could be an enemy by the situation changes
in this situation, Denmark government is the enemy
The “great powers must dominate or perish” worldview treats cooperation as weakness.
they may not perish but they have to dominate the rest of all for maximize the national interest
if you can't dominate it, China and Russia will take it
and in that situation I doubt if America would have a little bit leverage against anyone
this is a survival struggle of the nations
if you are not taking it, others will
Every empire claims that expansion is defensive.
what it claim was all used for maximize the interest as what specific in cases of war that would lower resistance as much as possible
what you claim for a war defines who is your enemy
National interest means the interest of the state and corporate elites, not the population.
it ultimately benefit the population in a capitalist system
Ordinary Americans do not benefit from wars of aggression.
without USD dominance you can't even travel to other countries with a low cost
national strength benefit its citizen
a random piece of Africa doesn't have any leverage and any industry or anything do you expect others to respect them ?
without American dominance and you probably don't even know what is universal value
Realest
I'm a Chinese American
my heart is under the red party
both Chinese Communist Party and Republican Party is red
🇺🇸 🇨🇳
Hm
By your logic weaker countries deserve domination because they lack leverage.
aren't they already being dominated which you didn't realize it ?
they were dominated since the end of the WW2
and they were dominated till now
If America takes Greenland do they kick out the Greenlanders out of the country bcs they're not American
everytime you name ccp a angel gets her period
This is the exact argument that European empires used to carve up Africa and Asia (including China) producing mass death, instability and underdevelopment.
Hm
the real situation is, if it's for maximize the interest of America, to prolong the foreign policy of intervention, you have to dominate them and cause more conflict and wars for American national interest
that is the reality
Hm
and they are doing exactly what I'm stating for
You're not describing reality, you're framing a moral choice. But if power determines sovereignty then you endorse colonialism, slavery, wars of aggression and every other state crime from the past 200 years.
that was also for their own interest to make their own country prosperous, some worked some did not work
you are taking a position that is not a first place in favor of the interest of the US
I'm taking a position that in what case you could maximize for the interest of the country
Empires can be extremely dominant while domestic inequality rises.
to solve domestic inequality, one effective solution is to create more wealth from outside of the world
and to create them, you need intervention
and domination
at least it really alleviate that from happening
for the most socialism path of improving distribution case, you are heading fast to communism
that ultimate path was planned economy, socialism and totalitarian control
in that case everybody is equal, equally poor
The US did not need to invade allies or annex territory to establish reserve-currency status. That arose from post-war institutions, stability and trust.
When USA gonna bomb iran
that trust did establish based on how US is going to guide they were building for, it is not a 0 price thing
actually they paid a lot by build their nation on US dominance and give the ultimate financial privilege to FRS that force them to use USD for global trading
as you could literally print money by creating deficit to generate tremendous wealth out of nothing
that does not even affect you very much from the inflation
You're arguing that domination is inevitable.
I am, and it is exactly how it happened
it's undeniably that domination is required for a country to be a global power
and it is the best for its interest
we are not talking how a country should exist under the moral framework I didn't argue that
and world did not look like that
you can't have domination while avoid causing war, suffer, starvation, disaster
that situation never happened
Saying domination already exists does not justify continuing it.
Hm
U are teacher here
Nice to meet u
🙏
it's my personal empirical observation and based on general analysis with my personality factors, I would decide to ignore moral framework at all, and I'll do the best for the country only regardless its means of achieving certain objectives
using bombs or using bread, doesn't matter
that's my stance
Would it be possible to use stale baguettes as bombs? If the hardiness is enough, they could achieve a small kinetic energy
with a C4 inside of it I don't mind to use that
I only heard they can be used as sword but you can try to use it as bomb. I'd like to see it. 
You wouldn't need explosives if it carries enough kinetic energy, I think the main issue would be heat dissipation when re-entering the atmosphere
We must contact the French to discuss this
"best for the country" implies a moral framework committed to values. what are the values implicit in your arguments in favor of domination; survival is better than collapse, power is better than vulnerability, control is better than cooperation.
are you talking about bomb or nuke? 
Without defining what "best for the country" means, it can mean anything. You might call total war, total ecological collapse and nuclear oblivion best for the country if it increases dominance in the short term.
what only defines the 'best' was in contributing the most national power projection
based on that we may have a lot of factors to sort over, from military, economy etc.
for example a number of the nuclear weapons possess is a very important factor that defines your power projection
the attacking range of the missile, the GDP, federal reserve, all defines the national power projection
it is not a concept that is in long term or short term, but a current concept which will affect the future in general
your national power projection defines what you are going to do in short term and long term
A strategy that increases the chances of total systemic collapse is not power maximizing.
You might prove such case with a hard situation but in case of possibility you can’t simply say that increase national power equals to getting close to systemic collapse
Minecraft said "Bomb or bread" and it made me think if you can use bread as bombs for re-entry instead of nukes. The formula for kinetic energy is KE = 0.5 × m × v × v. If you assume that one baguette is 0.25kg with a re-entry speed of 7000 m/s that becomes KE = 0.5 × 0.25 × 7,000 × 7,000 which gives us an estimated kinetic energy of around 6.1 MJ for just one baguette, even though a MIRV can carry several. 6.1 MJ isn't a lot as it's roughly the energy of 1.5 KG of TNT
Interesting nonetheless
Actually more national power you have basically defines how much flexibility you have and how much damage you could endure in case of war or diaster
or make it easier, the hard power is a basis of how a country could be exist as its the fundamental rule of survival
You may claim the path of getting the ultimate power is bloody, is immoral
That make sense
You seems forget about air resistant. That bread will burn to crisp before reach earth surface. Nonetheless the price of making baguette is cheaper than making a bomb so, continue your research, sir. 🫡
#🧠|serious-chat message I didn't account for it, that's an issue for the French
the hard power and national power projection is the factor that defines if you could realize any of your value
Power is a tool, not a goal.
both capitalism, communism, or even fascism need power
well value is a tool, not a goal
it is totally idealism to think that power cannot be a goal
actually power is a goal that why struggle between nations and countries exist
You seem to believe that power can be maximized without reference to anything else. But power must be constrained by some notion of success or else it becomes self justifying and directionless.
if you mean that the country got too much power which did not benefit its citizen but use this power and abuse this power to bully the citizen or impose a tyrant rule, I mean if that's why to reach the ultimate power, I don't think there's a problem
but currently it isn't
this way did not led to ultimate power, but total destruction
A goal tells you when to stop. Power doesn't tell you when to stop.
power struggle never have to stop and it will be non-stop for maximize the interest of whoever has the most power
winner takes all is the only rule
this is the world that survival for the fittest
you should tell that to your president, not some crazy guy on the internet
hahahah we are going to come after you together
These claims contradict each other if power seeking can destroy the system which is why I say that power seeking must be constrained by something to avoiding cancelling itself out.
What if they try to take over China?
A real goal has a success condition and a stopping condition. Power is not a real goal because power struggles do not end and can therefore justify endless war, ecological collapse and eventual self annihilation.
Europe, Asia and the US should fight against the rest of the world
power never cancel itself, but who has no qualification to hold it
Now you're saying that survival is the goal and power is the tool which makes survival possible which is a different argument. You're now admitting that extinction is failure and stability matters.
Did you vote for Trump?
Power requires people, institutions, living ecological systems.
he cant response those practical question directly.
because he claimed "power isnt a real goal", while his country is annexing other land.
survival for the fittest does not indicate the power struggle but if you explain in that way I would say who holds the most power who is the fittest
power is what defines a person fittest in struggle of survival
that make perfect sense in reality
The Chinese guy is much more honest by comparison
whats wrong with you, why do you desire to be dominated
i can dominate you, if you agree
power does not require anything, even without human, why human dominated the earth
because human holds the most power than ever and any other species
that's the only reason that human dominated the entire earth
in a struggle between persons, who has the most power, wins
in a struggle between countries, who has the most power wins
power defines who could win and who dominate the other
If power is the definition of fitness then "survival of the fittest" is a tautological argument, like saying the ones who survive are the ones who survive. Or the fit ones are fit. Or the ones with power have power.
Are you from Africa
no
.............crazy
@high rapids
Why not
No purpose?
yes
Your request is shallow
Nope
fleeing as a migrant to Europe or US and attacking people is crazy
in a struggle, that the fittest person is decided because of the power leverage it holds the most leverage in favor of winning the survival struggle, it never indicate the ultimate result, but based on the result you have the answer of why this person have survived in the struggle as what could be defined as power
the power is never only about the force
it is about everything that you could gain advantage and leverage from a struggle
What you consider a foreigner
you can't only count who has the bigger gun but who has more guns ? who has more manpower, who has more airforce or aircraft, or who has more nukes, who holds more economic power and resources
there are criminals everywhere, but i hate them too
Bangladeshis
we love peace , whatever happens
Damn
Epic fail btw
hahahahahahaha i saw it
The argument is circular. Who survives? the fittest. Who is the fittest? the ones with the most leverage. How do we know who had the most leverage? They survived. A theory that can only explain outcomes after they happen is just a restatement of results, not a theory of cause and effect. Yes, survival and dominance depend on different kinds of leverage. But for a framework to be useful is must tell us which strategies will increase the chances of survival and which strategies will increase the risk of collapse. Otherwise survival is a meaningless term that cannot guide decision making.
By mental model, I mean the cognitive cage that defines what a person can think, feel, and choose often without realizing they’re confined.
Basically, mental models are sort of cage.
The bars, assumptions you don’t question.
The shape, what thoughts are even allowed to form.
And you may ask why even let yourself be in a cage.
Simple really for logic to even begin, you need to assume this is reality, You are alive, And many more assumptions.
Without mental model for what I like to call it, Cage, you can't even begin to form coherent thoughts.
Why I use cage deliberately.
A cage isn’t always oppressive in appearance.
Some cages are comfortable.
Some are rewarded.
Some are called morality, identity, empathy, or normality.
But there's a rule in every cage, you can't move freely without punishment.
There're different kind of punishments and their forms differ.
This is where distinction is easier to make.
Freedom is not absense of punishment in internal mental model, It's authorship over it.
So you punish yourself before actions which you restrict in an internal model.
Unlike external model, where you are not punished by your own mind, rather external factors first.
External / unexamined model, violation triggers shame, guilt, fear.
Internal / authored model violation reveals. trade-offs, risks, and losses.
So if the driving force for not doing an action is shame, guilt or fear, you are operating on a external model.
And if the driving force for not doing an action is trade-offs, risk, and losses, The model is internal.
No, I am talking about something else.
well, a framework to be useful is based on maximizing the leverage that you have which is the power to ensure you could increase the chance of survival
because in a struggle survival, who has the most power, wins
LRWEITP
power is exactly the most important factor that you should decide what framework to be adopted in a survival struggle
You seem to accept a win condition which is defined by total collapse.
He who have red bull energy drink and a Twix holds the power
No, Incorrect, a framework should focus meeting the necessity of a individual.
If you try to gain power beyond your needs, People will try to attack and interrupt your framework.
a win condition is confirmed when the struggle of survival cease to exist, which did exist right now
Your chance of survival decreases if you don't use deception and try to take too much power.
the result might be total destruction or other results, we don't know
There's a sweetspot.
Where are the people with a job I want meal prep lunch ideas
Victory and defeat are irrelevant, What's important is gain and losses.
Hm
Even if you "win" the battle, it might cause unnecessary loss.
This chat is full of nerds
Mind your tone I have a 1.98 KD ratio on bf6
...
I don't understand 1.98kd on bf6
I´m Emerald 2 rank in league of legends
I better not see you in fortnite
HAHAHAHA
Oh waste of time
Fortnite is intellectually more challenging than chess
@real lily 3 pings
._? Chess is headache whereas Fortnite is fun
@real lily now 4
Fortnite is much more difficult than chess
95% of chess is memorising openings, there is nothing else to it, the remainder is stress
No , chess has quadrillion postions
-_-
Fortnite is objectively more challenging because it tests memorisation for building, spatial awareness, reactions and EQ through the ability to work well as a duo
Let me google
True intellectuals do not play chess
Neither chess nor Fortnite is objectively "tougher"; they demand different skills, with chess requiring immense strategic depth, pattern recognition, and deep knowledge, while Fortnite demands high-speed reflexes, aim, building, and quick decision-making under pressure, with top players in both games displaying god-tier skills but in distinct arenas. Chess mastery involves vast theoretical stud
"Computers are better at computing"
Who would've thought
No, I know that blind folks can use Braille for chess though
Yeah that kinda adds to my point, 95% of chess is just memorisation. I've seen a few people use ELO in chess as a metric for intelligence, like no bro you just memorised openings
Why from non-Indian countries
Isn't it kind of strange to join a Discord server just to get people's email addresses so you can scam them?
how did you prove it?
Pffft
._. not funny blud.
Oh we didn't, he just wanted to see how we'd go about thinking about it
1+1=2 is more difficult to prove than what some people realise
questioning beliefs ehh?
It is, Because if you try to disprove you might end up seeing the cognitive cage that exists for everyone.
As even logic itself requires assumptions.
i am really confused bc how obvious is that "non-indian" 🥲😭
Its the 'Tell me you're running a scam without telling me you're running a scam' 101
Guys he's helping people
He just needs the cards expiration date and the funny numbers on the back
Ohhhh, so he's just like those Nigerian princes, just your average friendly philanthropic wealth redistributor
'I want to save the world, I just need your money to do it!'

he is gone
what are numbers? numbers are roles in a system of rules.
a starting point and a defined number of steps to the next point
they are positions
and they have definitions
similar to the pieces on a chess board
positions in a structure
I did see that. Pity there's not a roasting channel for people like that to get locked in before banning.
Either you're just saying things or I'm a dumbass
Wtf does that mean
When humans invented math they didn't invent this abstract bull
He's explaining the concept of numerals, and their behaviours and positions. Math becomes more abstract the more you delve into the whys and wherefores
The beginning of something is rarely as complex as later iterations
I understand that at a certain point you need to delve deep to understand it.
But not for 1+1💀💀
It's true that math originally was used for more practical applications. counting sheep, days, dept. the abstraction came later when people tried to understand and explain why counting works
This is what i mean.
Why wouldn't counting work? Why do we need to explain it?
Understanding why 1+1=2 is fundamental to more complex ideas like physics and calculus. The whole structure depends on certain things remaining true.
If you sincerely interested I suggest the book Intro to mathematical philosophy
Imma give it a quick read👍👍
Hell, the device you're using depends on it. Computers are basically just math.
But that's why axioms are there...so we don't have to prove the building blocks
Yeah, but who made those axioms, and how? Someone, somewhere, had to ask why, and then show it
explaining what counting means prevents it from making errors at more complex levels. 1+1 might be intuitive but when you start dealing with zero, negatives, fractions and infinity intuition becomes harder and explanation becomes necessary.
Deportation now
For example, imagine a hotel room with infinite rooms numbered 1, 2, 3, 4...
every room is full. no vacancies. a new guest arrives. what happens?
Yes but at some point when we reach deep enough you can never explain the basic foundations for maths because you'll need maths to do so
So you have to just accept certain stuff
that's right. at a point you hit axioms where you don't prove, you assume.
I know about the infinite hotel and i understand that infinity is abstract. But most maths isn't. I don't see the need to just make it vague
It's 300+ pages😭😭
I don't have any sort of deep background in math, but I have picked up a bit of the theory. And yes, at some point we have to just scratch our heads and go 'this works, and we don't know why yet, so just go with it for now til a new mind comes along with a different perspective.'
Omg 👀
It's book😭
What's going on here?
Humans ever build upon the foundations laid by earlier minds. So perhaps what we call axioms today will be proven rather than assumed at a later point. Which would be cool
Let's review the basics. 1. math is about logic, not intuition. 2. numbers are not things. they are logical constructions. 3. definitions replace intution. 4. order and relations come before counting. 5. infinity is unavoidable but manageable. 6. paradoxes are warnings.
finally;
abstraction helps us to stop arguing about what "obvious" means.
No way!!!
Why are u surprised it's long
300+ pages aren't that long.
Depending on if you are actually interested in the subject.
Yall are making me feel incompetent
It's long
Don't underestimate your capabilities

+1
Not the capability issue, Rather interest issue.
Yeah i agree
Look into it, it's a really fun head scratcher, there's several YouTube videos on Russell's paradox
Yeah totally if you are interested 300+ pages are like nothing 
@abstract night hello sir how are you
I´m glad too hear that, I´m doing well thanks for asking
Nope wbu?
Hi people

No.
Everyone making a big deal over moroco team stealing towels from the Senegal gatekeeper but am I the only one that think this is a bit hilarious
AI
yeah it looks very "AI"
Ya but it did happened
I thought it is black magic or some shi
Lol
I find it very useless cuz senegal gatekeeper is trash anyway
All shots were ez to block
In Africa u shoulda expect everything
What a useless mov
they won a towel with ribbon?
That's a long ass name.
Anyways Senegal deserved the champion
💯
Btw where come from?
uranus
Morocco
Seriously?
Let me guess
Well
Are u trippin or some?
How so?
You're from Algeria?
Hellll yeah
Nice to meeet you brother!
Big respect and I hope for the decline of hate between us
Glad to hear that
It's just social media. Nothing can be real tho
U guys are kinda our family
don't take it asa compliment
😃 👋
Real talk



