#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 845 of 1

but we are also blocked by currents technology to investigate before big bang, ill wait until the evidence comes
What I'm basically saying is that you're choosy
lmao a theory is a highest honour in science
š š
and theory in science is equivalent to fact
wrong.
It's the closest.
Not the fact itself.
No... here u lost...
you confusing between a hypothesis and a theory
You are confusing theory with fact
theory is a fact
do you know the scienctic method?
theory and law are the top pinocle of science
A fact is something with validity, that we can affirm and prove.
Prove the Big Bang, please.
He's just making this easy for me
so big bang is the point in universe from where universe started to expand.
and how did we start with the number 13 billion years bc the oldest thing in the universe is background cosmic radiation which was 13 billion years
But... What is that proving?
that universe has a point which was 13 billion years ago which we call big bang
wrong.
whats wrong
Hola
No. We are not doing this.
This is deflection and ego, I won't entertain that.
You look fun i wanna be friends
What's wrong is that your assertion doesn't exactly prove the ābangā.
Are u japanese
That's what I'm getting at.
na
Shut the fuck up
Pay for ur sins.
are you aztec?
Jaleuse
No
wait you think Big Bang was an explosion?
It's about expansion, right?
Pay for you food.
yes its about expansion
not explosion
Bot
i got my parents for it
š
Great. What does that have to do with the existence of the universe?
big bang was the place where existence of universe started
wild
2pac died for your sins
2pac was gay
Tupacā¤ļø
thats a sin
tupac shakur
š unfortunaly he died before I war born
Hi
"i war born"
you said hi like 10 times
Shut the fuck up beachš
As an american I'm free to say.
i wish
I was a little bit taller
we got ahort king here
I'm 6'2
so you have the evidence of god?
But it started devoid of anything.
Is that the framework work?
Whr r u from
Well well well
Yes
ig yea
my framework is mostly what science can prove
i doubt that
Yeah⦠but even that's shaky
its a theory
theory is not hypothesis
This doesn't even mean anything either.
It's an attempt of sounding clever ā with no real weight attached
your confusing
so you think big bang is false?
i can more hindi, but you wont understand
marathi
gurajati
and what not
ig thats your american bubble
A joke?
That's not what I've directly said.
I'm just saying you haven't really said anything
Do u wanna an explaim
i literally explained big bang to you
What you said has no connection with our existence
can you explain how did universe begin to exist
im gonna say abiogenesis but ig you dont belive in science
Shouldnt u be a muslim
Or something like that
That's strawmaning
the existence of life is abiogenesis
š thats not a fallacy
So shit evolved. I agree
no
abiogenesis and evolution are different
š
evolution is how species or life change over time
abiogenesis is where did life came from
I believe some scientific things but I believe it didn't happen from thin air ā without the interference of an intricate creater
sure prove that creator

Yeah. Sure.
Once you give me proof
i dont believe in a god
you do
you have the burden of proof to prove the things you claim to be the case
I reject your āburdenā prove to me there isn't a god
i never said there isnt a god
i said dont belive there is one
just like i believe theres no bigfoot
but i cant prove theres no bigfoot
@thorny steeple so no evidence for god?
I'm on the verge of sleep. Won't dodge you. Send me a friend request so we can carry this out in DMs.
Ok?
no sir
evidence or goodbye?
āļø
jst like every theist
Honestly. Whatever helps you cope.
Your big bang theory is flawed.
I want to carry this through. You don't.
And honestly...
Just like every atheist. ā
you have kindergarden knowlegde about what a theory is
Just send me a friend request or don't.
But don't frame it as a win on your end, you can't even defend your own theory without tripping.
Goodbye.
denial
Ppl who can find "flaws" in the big bang theory but not in the bible is crazy
finding flaws in a 2000+ year old book translated a million times is pretty normal
Their skepticism is solely devoted to science that contradicts their beliefs
If you can even call it skepticism
Typical
Actually I couldn't write the demerits or trade-offs at a structure level because discord doesn't allow long paragraphs.
Asking empirical evidence for a faith based claim.
That's now how it works.
Faith based claims do not require empirical evidence to exist.
ok sure
i believe theres no god based on faith
check mate
believing don't change facts.
Their entire framework works on faith.
Exist - Yes
To be Credible - Bro you need evidence.
faith is unreliabe path to truth
Sometimes I too question science, not in a perverse way.
Although I suppose a substantial chunk of it stems from my ignorance.
I conjecture that there might be things science is incapable of explaining or even becoming aware of. When you take how limited a human's senses are, and how diverse the universe itself is into account, it's dubious to think that we know everything. I mean no disrespect to anyone who's reading this, and I'd love to be proven wrong in a civil, non-argumentative manner.
Canāt make policy on faith
asking for empirical proof of a faith-based claim is like asking:
āWhatās the mass of justice?ā
āShow me a ruler measurement of loveā
āProve axioms before using logicā
Credible to whom?
Reality?
Facts donāt care about your feelings bro. As I have been told so often
No? It's audience relative.
And truth is irrelevant as there's no single truth as concrete, it's ever changing.
i believe in what things can be proven
Good Morning Republicans
But we're not necessarily debating faith, we're debating religion. God as a concept it pretty vague not religion has a solid base. We have a tradition of philosophers who even tried to rationalize religion such as Saint Thomas etc and that we can argue
and what evidence there is
I mean math is a constant regardless of a mind. The words may change but two plus two always equals four.
Feuerbach for instance did a great work of interpreting religion
since when empirical means reality ?
empirical could be proven fake and non-existence
or it doesn't prove anything
I said in my empirical experience that Jesus told me I'm the fucking cousin of him so I can launch a revolution against imperial rule ?
well there was one guy literally did that and almost win
Hong Xiuquan (1 January 1814 ā 1 June 1864), born Hong Huoxiu and with the courtesy name Renkun, was a Chinese revolutionary and religious leader who led the Taiping Rebellion against the Qing dynasty. He established the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom over large portions of southern China, with himself as its "Heavenly King".
Born into a Hakka famil...
Really? Let me give you an example, You know how national borders are made? They are man made, They don't really exist in reality now do they, So why do you believe borders exist?
national borders are concept which i believe in
š
People die people get born people join people breakup people leave people get banned people get muted
But that Chinamainland guy stays here
they are not a physical things
And next he will talk about how money is imagined
Here, You believe in them, Why?
I got federal immunity
cus they are on paper and demonstrable
Lmfao
Same thing with god, They believe in him that he exists.
LMFAO
For reasons beyond my comprehension
is god demonstrable?
no just admit it, I have federal immunity
even i got banned but minecraft didntā¦
On paper but not in reality right? Just like in books he's on paper.
Do u know what does this server look like outside this chat
Heās like ronald mcfuckingdonald heās a clown but heās our clown that we canāt legally or socially part with.
I think this server belongs to him at this pint
And how are national borders demonstrable?
none of my business ?
Lmao
yk prisoners that have been jailed and havent seen the sun for years, yes, thatās minecraft
I need to send him to the Flatearth chat and get some popcorn
Math and religion are not the same things, Even math is made on countless assumption.
And math as sin cos doesn't exist in reality, we assume them.
like Donald J. Trump
you don't want to admit he's the President but he is
š
it seems every Republican administration would tend to expand their business outside of the country
throughout the 20th and 21th century
i can prove and show you nationaly borders can you do it for god?
And I am not talking about empirical evidence.
Because religion framework doesn't function on empirical evidence.
you literally have a broder check up
at the cross border
Really? So they exist in reality and aren't man made?
We human literally made them.
they exist and man made.
They doesn't exist in nature.
i didnt put forward that idea
We can't really argue faith I get it but what is your point besides that?
Just because we can't argue faith does not mean we can't argue a religion book
Yes, that's the thing, People believed that this is where border end.
The belief created borders.
Idgf about personal belief as long it's not used for political purposes
dont try act like border or god are even in the same category
You absolutely can, But rather than criticizing can you create a framework better than religion?
You can point out flaws but can you make a better one?
In belief system, they are the same thing.
And religious communities work on belief.
I rejected the idea that we even need to have one
Ohh?? Really? Do you know the social outbreak and benefits of this structure?
Religion is stabilizing society in various ways.
I am not religious and never will be, But removing it will cause choas.
so god is created by man, just like borders?
Yeah and I also know how it damages it
any system can stabilizing system include dictator. Moreover, aren't many religions relied on believers to spread their message. Doesn't that distrupt system?
Lol
It makes people docile to a oppressive system
Big deal
i can see syria pretty stable
š
At structural level Yes, and guess what? The benefits that religion provides.
Certainty, low Cognitive load, freedom from nihilism, and last of all, Consistent meaning in life.
To get that certainty, they need to believe god is not man made, I know contradiction, but contradiction doesn't need to be fixed in belief based system
And? They can still live their lives meaningfully and with comfort.
Oppressive is an trade-off here, not an issue to be resolved.
then humans are unfit to survive if they need religion
do you have evidence of god yes or no
the benefit of social order is enough to be civil in society
We can find meaning in life as atheists, you're treating people like they're children
ideology does the same
or can make them chaotic
That's true ideology is actually a fascinating topic
Docility is a stabilizing mechanism.
im atheist and my family is the reason for me to live lmao
Yes. Social stability often requires people to tolerate hierarchy and constraints. Thatās not a bug. thatās the function.
people forget that as religion declined, ideology rose up
i dont care about a religion or god until you show me its true
why would you think that way
That's external meaning, you know that right?
if you don't have any family so you wouldn't live ?
that's a fucking huge assumption to be made
Yup and that's the only meaning possible
Me neither, I am not religious.
I am simply stating the structure.
Strangers can become family
i have my family as one of the reasons form e to live
you live because your DNA doesn't want to die
if your DNA says you should die, you won't be born in the first place
that's the natural selection
No? Have you ever learned about individuality, freedom, meaning from will, and last of all, internal autonomy?
Ok Charles Darwin
the rest that lives, all wanted to live and have won the survival struggle in the past
There are various meanings not only one.
besides these, all of them have dead
I'm not sure if you are winning this survival struggle or not, but you sure having a good luck
well my dna is dependent on my life choices
Those are all narratives you tell yourself, and?
to born and live in one of the most comfortable world that humanity ever experience
what? You are serious right? Those are not narratives, those are structural level meaning.
it is but you understand your DNA wasn't only work as your own they are part of the great social complex of humanity
one individual almost won't affect the group
unless you have social power
idk if that works I don't need that obviously
by count I just need few close friends and a reliable family that won't affect my business
also cover my freaking back and I already had that
Not nobel btw, almost everyone lives for that.
I want to know, why do you believe what you believe?
If answer is society, family, friends, social influence.
You are lacking the same thing religious people lack, Self authorship.
how else do you become family? hahaha
being religious does not push self-authorship
It doesn't, it trades it for moral certainty.
I know same thing with society.
well that moral certainty could exist without religion
Well you're assuming that every structure created by religion serves a good purpose and that's debatable
Those are at least only affected by the individual
religion was an ideology that was created by human used by authority to regulate the people with a lower cost based on story-telling and belief
They blame religion for being blind, While they are blind to their own beliefs.
and it fit perfectly in old means of production
I know.
That's why I said it's a trade-off not something magical.
Creating community
Nuclear family is overrated anyway
you want to share a person? š
spicy
What
you said nuclear family is overrated
guess we need a third person in a relationship
Syria released ISIS prisoners
I am not, I know the demerits of religion as well, and I am not religious to begin with.
I know how it works, And society is slowly interchanging religion.
Although society provides more justice and tries to gain equality, it degrades moral certainty and comfort.
personally I would never marry
Syria released ISIS prisoners.
i want to marry cause i want to be with someone forever
its more sentimental than pragmatic tbh
What if you fall out of love?
Ofc, their president is ex ISI
i married you not because i expected the feeling of love to last but because i see a future with someone i can respect, admire, and live with.
he was brainwashed
love may not last but it doesnt mean i dont feel for you
ofc, right?
im not naive
Then why marry?
Hahaha yeah who doesnāt accidentally join isi, talk with baghdadi, make an al Qaeda offshoot, and then make a new group after lmao
cause i want to spend the rest of my life with you...?
right right
do i need to drug myself to stay in love?
Well ok that's fair
I wouldn't marry for different reasons
well i understand you dont want to, but may i ask why you dont want to
Do you even know the definition of love?
wowww
he wasnt even someone random in al qaidah, ig the people like him on purpose as well
they like the terrorist part of him more than anything
thats why they are not even bothered abt it
Well, you either marry for economical reasons or to start a family or for your reason, which is to sustain your love
I want to be financially independent, I don't want kids and also don't feel the need to sustain love, I think love should exist for as long as it does
I just hate gender roles, I just want to be equal yk
I can't imagine my life marrying and then taking care of the house and cooking 'em dinner
what if you were the one working and your husband stayed at home?
First of all, any framework outside of your own consciousness, is morally incomplete, It lacks a crucial role.
Moral autonomy.
So no, not even society can do that.
No external mental model can do that, that's why I asked which model you operate on.
join the army then
I want to be equal
The ideal to me will be we both work and we both have our own lives yk
I don't want to live w my partner
the thing is roles need to be filled
I prefer having a career I would like
I know
people have to fit into their functions and that is perfectly fine
I didn't say it was
good luck but take care of yself
But we can't deny our freedom of choice
If maintaining a social structure gives me a life I don't want to live then what's the point?
i am more traditional cause it seems more effective to be so but choice is more important. Sometimes you need to think outside the box to solve problems. Its why the roles must be filled but choose your role.
Exactly!
And statistically I know that the house work usually falls over women
if my partner is better as the breadwinner then she will do so
i will do whatever my partner needs
we fit our roles as needed
I think we mostly agree on the descriptive facts. Religion is not necessary for stability, and extrinsic morality doesnāt produce moral purity. Where we differ is on system-level risk. My claim was never that religion is the best or only tool. itās that it has historically functioned as a stabilizer, and removing it at scale without universally effective replacements can create instability. Thatās a transition problem, not a moral endorsement.
I never claimed religion can be utilised effectively for morality.
That's very bold of you
Thank you!
im practical. If something doesnt work, then we try something else.
I think thereās a large majority of Sunni Arabs that are mostly blind/donāt care about ethnic minorities except for when it effects the stability of the government, so theyāre happy to let their government just harass minorities
And the same goes with society.
Law and enforcement.
It isn't different from religion.
A lot of men are blind to a woman's need, glad you're willing to do the work
Answered you already here
#š§ ļ½serious-chat message
Hope you ain't acting dyslexic on purpose
the thing is we are supposed to fulfill their needs. That is already part of being a partner and even traditionally speaking.
we as men*
its funny how your first statement sounds like it refers to the adult side of a relationship which applies as well
Many countries and societies are still strictly mysogynist. It doesn't surprise me.
Social evils need to be acknowledged and corrected. Not immediately but eventually.
Thankfully many men are understanding systematic suppression of women and working towards it
I donāt disagree that religion loses institutional power in societies with high epistemic freedom. My point isnāt that religion should dominate or that itās uniquely stable. Itās that no external system religious or secular produces morality by itself. Questioning doesnāt eliminate norms. it shifts moral authority inward. That applies equally to religion and secular ethics.
The point is, you are incorrect about that the only way it could function that way because it suppressed curiosity.
But there are many religious people who are curious and yet are religious.
Then don't sexualise every little detail about women.
Let women live a life. your life's purpose should be higher than that.
Third time repeating myself.
You know who throws personal insults in a debate/discussion ?
What are u guys arguing about I wanna join
He triggered me saying
Women wearing shorts and crops tops = women walking naked
He wanted to demean women
With mysogynistic views
I agree, but I think people was like that with the assad government as well
idk why people keep supporting oppressing each other when we all can be free at the same time
looks like it will never work with the syrians
Bro never experienced summer
I think the main thing is now itās worse because of the war
he just doesnāt understand it is cultural differences
Bro screaming how incompatible he's for some societies and countries
idk why people keep attacking women for what they wear
true and all minorities are suffering
Yup
@urban swift btw are u muslim
Why would you think that
I mean no culture should tell women how to dress
It's ridiculous that if you feel desire from a woman's body then she should cover up and not you just stop sexualizing them
ā¦yh ig i cant comment on that
š
but ar eu an ex one or hindu
or something else
None
I see
i am muslim, but ive heard time understanding other ones around the world
yh whatever everyone should believe in what they want to
I like rumi
God is humans projecting their own parts into something external
Our best parts perhaps
I can never like mohammad
yh but like i mean not in all cultures women weqr crops and shorts. so when people from certain countries see others that wear differently, they are quick to judge or comment
The more I read about mohammad the more I dislike him
and then ofc its a norm thing, does a woman wanna wear shorts or whatever, its hear choice and society should learn to respect differences
I like both
And I donāt believe every source I reas
I got no problem with islam itself but the people that practice it (not all of them)
Lmfao
well culture tells us TO dress
lol, idk if that is based or not
At least you don't have to wear a bra
Clothes can be oppressive š
tbh i cant imagine what its like for you
well women in general
heard about back issues and the discomfort over tight size
When I was a kid I wanted to rip my chest out cause I felt so uncomfortable
But you get used to it
sorry about that
Thankfully I don't have that problem lmao
heard sports bras are the best option possible
you have a smaller size, most likely
i heard most of that happens if its a larger size
awwww š
I did.
And I know.
If you don't wanna start an argument, sure.
Although, I am curious, which mental model do you operate on? External or internal.
That alone will clarify a lot.
I part agree but I sure agree.
I am exploring it. It's not like I'm completely rejecting the existence of God but sometimes the dots doesn't connect if I don't act dumb.
For example, there was an experiment multiple sheep were born in lab without a mother sheep's womb.
Through only cells.
And dna is just 14 kinds of acids
No one ever testified the hell and heaven returning from there, proving the existence. There are just stories you gotta just trust it. (Although I don't give a flying duck about heaven)
If God watches/knows everything, why he letting women get (graped.
Even worse, kids/babies get graped?
Just stop it instead of being a voyeur
There are centuries of philosophy debating Christianity and religion in general
I don't even care because I just reject the idea immediately
god is the least thing i find real
What bothers me more
Same, I don't find National borders real as well.
Is how they justify centuries of oppression towards women for instance with the text
Not only justify but creates myths around the nature of the woman
i do find them real
Have you heard the story of how mohammad captured his jewish teenage wife safiya bint?
Unfortunate.
yea its called countries
you should check up geography

And yes, It's called man made.
so is a car, but cars also exist
Bro your analogy sucks
Sorry to tell ya
whose?
@gloomy frost
I can't really explain the concept that easily.
You might want to check on Google I gotta go to work.
I will tell you later.
I have a theory.
Women entertained this idea of oppression because it let some women on top of hierarchy by being highly religious.
But national borders are not real.
i agree hes comparing a supernatural god to natural borders
Both work on belief.
Comparing apples to oranges
Either way, Don't believe in god for all I care.
Do what you want.
You should check that they have check ups and barded wires at the borders
They're still different and hold different places in society and that's what we're interested in
they don't exist in nature.
And so does religion hold different places in society.
check ups and barbed wire dont exist in nature?
š š
I was talking about national borders as a concept.
If you know what that means.
yea concept dont exist as a physcial things
i see it as just a pary of their hypocrisy

nvm this is like the bizzare arguement
I think being religious is a way to feel more safe in patriarchy since they're valued for their reproductive capacities and judged heavily
for god i have ever heard
Same thing buddy god is a concept.
Keep going, it clears concepts
š š š
Not real, god doesn't exist I know.
What's that language again? 
i grew up christian so it helped me strengthen my moral code but eventually my code changed to a pragmatic morality. I still believe in good and law for the sake of bettering the self and others but not at the expense of either. Cause law and "good" are manipulated by many to oppress people.
inst god a entity or agent? why tf are you calling it a concept
bro is back
Shut up
It's not, it is considered as an entity or agent for moral certainty and comfort.
It does exist as an entity or agent
Yes the best we can do is keep reflecting and shaping our beliefs to the better
Who wanna be my friendš ā¤ļø
For religious people.
Saying the obvious now
for me i treat perfection like an assymptote in mathematics. Unattainable but we try to get as close as possible. It is about the journey, bettering ourselves.
Do you like math?
That's it man
to an extent yes
Lol I really wish I had the time it takes to learn it
My studies are all humanities
I have no reason to study it but it speaks to me

Didn't like the course?
Change is always welcomed
I love my humanities studies I wouldn't change it
its worth trying a little bit
we need to talk about it sometime š
Pure mathematics seems so poetic
Sure!
oops
I study for diplomacy so it's very interdisciplinary
want to vc?
I believe 8 billion people= 8 billion mindsets.
Not everyone thinks alike. Some accept the world as it is and make a move accordingly.
Some are idealists.
(Some are both)
Some women found power in being highly religious since religious people had found an excuse to exterminate all just because others didn't believe in their concept of god and their god is the one and only holy, supposed to be worshipped so the rest of humanity is worth exterminating or converting.
That's such an excuse that boost morale in soldiers.
You want mass of human to commit atrocities? Make them believe they doing it for some greater cause
Now I can't, everyone is sleeping
another time
Maybe some other time
Oh for sure! Literature as well. It's what I love the most in the world so I would never ruin it
im not big on literature but there is stuff i would enjoy
That's really on point
Slavoj Zizek said in Doestoevsky's Brothers Karamazov there's this idea that if god doesn't exist then everything is permitted. For Zizek is the other way around, if god does exist then everything is permitted, since every crime is justifiable under divine justice
Bro never offered me vc š
Now I'm jealous
eh you are open too
we can invite you sometime
Have you ever thought about diplomacy? It would embody all of them
Personally, I really like political science and law is very dry to me but if you enjoy it it's all that matters
Economics is great too

I like to read classics from all periods and as widely as I can
I also love some contemporary stuff too

im trying to read that book
i have it
Lol
I know Dostoevsky is popular but those past 4 years he got huge
We need a balance
As Camus said, philosophers ask questions and novels live them
It seems really nice
It just keeps me wondering how nice it must be to be an author
You can find an excuse to spend years researching about something you're interested in and write a novel about it
ill vc you tomorrow š
we can talk about your study then
gnite
Don't even tell me... it's just amazing to find someone who thinks like this, it's becoming more and more difficult
And yeah, it's such a strong feeling. Last year I finished Elena Ferrante's tetralogy and it was like a very dear person just died. It's ridiculous that a book can do that to us, I'm sad just thinking about it
Forgot to mark it
Reading poetry also has this effect you described, it's so magical that you can find and order words in such a brilliant way to evoque a specific feeling
It's all about the universality in the specific
No you didn't,you said having preferences is insecure and now you trying to cover that.Please Explain how having preferences is insecure?
Having preferences is not hating women.Are you for real right now? If you go back I clearly said I don't care what a women wears and asked how does men having preferences make him insecure
Nobody is sexualizing women.If a man walks in the streets with the most tightest short he is walking naked same goes for women.Not everything is misogyny and sexualizing getting a grip.This how you were brainwashed by the rogue feminists
Your dodging every question.Stop ghosting and explain yourself
The stupidity
bro changed the subject and can't even defend what he said
Am I wrong
Yeah youre the one sexualizing them, an object cannot hold your feelings in itself. Don't blame them for your distorted ideas
"Nobody is sexualizing women" bro? We cannot even show our nipples without men sexualizing us
hi
Do you know how this argument between me and that guy started and what started this argument
what do you call a women who goes to club at night?
It reminds me when men used to fantasize that witches could magically make them excited if you know what I mean
It's like a primitive brain that does not understand that your the one to blame for your own feelings towards an object
Couldn't care less
Argue on private chat then
Beach
If you want to walk in the middle of the street without a top do it.Tf
no feminist
That's not the point dumbass
Wearing tight clothes ā being naked
Do u think?
Then don't intervene.simple
why do you wanna show your nipples
š
No I got the message clear you want to walk topless do it.you numbskull
š
You see their mindset?
Keep digging in and you'll find a more uglier side of it
why do women wanna wear less and less clothing?
A man wears the most tightest short he can find that shows his everything and he is shirtless, would you feel comfortable around him
Bro they're just here, I just want to let them exist without worrying all the time if they're visible otherwise a weirdo might come to me
theres a thing called bra
It's not about less and less, it's about freedom to wear whatever they want
š
Why is there something wrong with it?
@fallow shard
men get freedom to wear they cover all the shit
I'm not the one sexualising them, I couldn't care less what they wearš
@fallow shard Would you feel comfortable around him
Bra is just a piece of fabric, it can still be visible dumbass
women do the opposite
Beach
And some women don't want to wear bras they're uncomfortable
its bizzare a man has to teach about a bra to a women
š
how big are they
Yeah cause you don't need to? I know more than you about my gender
It just proves that you know nothing about it
oh yeah? can you tell me about man-o-pause
Yea? Why should it be different thing for women
Funnee so funneee
it is different cause men are covering themselves, women are going fo literallly backless, skirt till their panties
Cool and I am uncomfortable around such people,so I live in a modest city.Nobody is being forced to wear things they don't like or forced to see things they don't want to see. A win win
well i can be silly sometimes
Are you going into raves or take ur samples there
Lmfao
you got that right
This man can't be real
He's a joke
Man:I have preferences.
Rogue feminist:How dare you
Men can show it too
just shave it ig
Difference in the culture. Finland is one of the countries where nudity is more acceptable than in most of the countries
Is this chat just insecure
I wish I was being forced to see hot women
hi
are you talking about nudist beach?
How unfair
What's topic..
Robert plant did it well
No, generally more accepting. It's bcs our sauna culture mostly
Go wash your mouth
Nah coming from Arkansas itās sort of taboo to see that much of other people
singer
See ,your more accustomed to nudity and I more accustomed to modesty.And I didn't even try to force anyone to wear modest.
And you're bitching about showing some skin? Jesus
i mean but they all looked a lil fruity to me tho
Exactly this whole chat is about cultural differences and problems but they don't get it
no i love rock
Pretty much lol
I couldn't give a less of a fuck if someone wears less clothing bcs I'm used to it
That's why they're so sexy, men don't do it like that anymore sadly
soul of a women was created below
Yeah I do think itās weird past a certain point š
to you sure
but not to me
Yeah rockstars stole all the sex appeal from men and they never got it back
atleast if their doing it pls shave your bellies and chest hair
do you like hairy men?
Depends on time and place. This chat seems to be not okay w women in shorts in hot summer days which is questionable. Why would that bother you? It's literally more comfortable for them
@turbid dome I don't understand this people.They say don't sexualize us and then end up sexualizing themselves.Don't they know that not everything is about a women's body
no no no
short is cool
You know who has no hair right buddy
sorry?
Don't really care about it
I am as confused as you are
Children
Time and place sure. Personally I donāt like seeing anyone in shorts on hot summer days, upper legs are weird. In the summer I wear pants still lmao
Women aren't sexualising themselves, if you think that, you're the problem
idk why you would bring a kid
i thought women didnt like hairy men
define sexualising
What is that in the picture.
That is sexualizing yourself.
Lmao i laughed at my own joke
You canāt be serious š
Personal taste I guess, i can't answer for all women
Yea but it's difference in lot of things
Myself? How did I sexualize myself?
"I wish I was being forced to see hot women?"
I just made a lil joke
Yeah ig
And???
Itās a joke
!!
The way you never look at your family members
F nah it ain't.
You need to read more dude, go try to interpret texts
i never understood the concept of sexualizing, would either of you ladies explain me how @sonic lion @fallow shard
That sexualizing yourself.
Hi
too vague
hOw?
u might not like my definition but it's about objectifying and seeing someone solely as sexual being
It is NOT

what would a person not-sexualizing do? or act like?
Tell me how it is not sexualizing yourself
Seeing them as humans???š
š©š©š©
Wtf you're the one assuming so you explain
i mean a person seeing someone as sex object is still seeing them as humans, can you be more specific
The way they interpret this whole situation?
Here comes the uglier part... They see women not covered from** head to toe?
She's basically asking for it.
She deserved to be graped.
If some eve teasing, SA happens it's her fault.
Such societies/people victim blame. Even justify rapes
I'VE EXPLAINED THIS TOO MANY TIMES
red flag
Oh hell noš
Explain please
You
Look at username
It's impossible
One letter away from butt hole Pepe
i mean if you clarify it ill stop doing it
Women being blamed for men's actions towards her, as always
This chat makes me lose my hope for humanity
Intresting
woah woah woah
I'm out
excuse me?
You had hope?
I swear to god, they can debate about everything to geopolitics from religion but as soon as the topic is women, everyone is a dumbass
Just shut up.ahh your sexualizing women when I was talking to duck about how how our customs are different you dropped in and said you wish you are forced to see hot women
Just because he can't control his lust and eyes.
That's his fault he ignored to learn that. Not hers.
how did we go from sexualizing to grape in a second š thats a huge faith of leap
I MADE A JOKE jesus christ
If someone wears less clothing it's not them sexualising themselves, it's about wearing comfortable clothes. If you find it inherently sexual, you're the problem bcs you can't see women or men in other than sexual way. That's it, I'm done. If someone tries to argue, eat bricks
ššš
You said you were being forced to see what "you didn't want to see" (meaning women in tight clothes or something) and I joked about it
Move on dude seriously
Is it your first time hearing a joke?
It's impossible to be more clear than that, if you don't get it then your mind is just polluted
So you are joking about sexualizing women?
Istg if someone tries to argue I'm going to beat someone's grandma
Tbh Iāll let you punch the ashes of both of mine for free
I... Okay, did not expect that
How
No, you're the joke. You're the one who wants women to cover all their body because their body is a threat to your own desires towards them. Hope this helped
I forgot ashes is more common there
Yeah everyone is cremated lol, itās way cheaper to just instantly cremate than to prep the body and coffin
Probably couldnāt have afforded a burial if it wasnāt cremated
Coffin all the way here
So when you are caught joking about sexualizing women you panic and just assume stuff coolš¤£š¤£
Yeah I would prefer that tbh
Read that again and maybe you'll understand
Never even heard anyone being cremated here
I can't thank God enough for being born here
freddie mercury was actually fruity š
Rich smh
Yea??
And?
Isn't that obvious
What I understood is your caught joking about sexualizing women,got confronted panic and just assumed some stuff about random stranger.
not all fruity men who wear make up are fuity
Dude you can't even comprehend a basic text š
I was joking about YOU
Not all fruity men are fuity ???? ššš¤£š
Prince
Idk the expenses but I'd assume it's cheap enough people do it here
wasnt famous enough
Probably subsidized lmao
Excuse me?
Do you have like family burial grounds?
Prince wasn't famous enough? š
im a huge rock fan and i dont know prince
Yea but it's still pretty common knowledge that he was

Ngl idk who he is
He was more pop than rock tbf
like men wearing makeup you know
It didn't seem like it.We are on serious topic and who would joke on such a thing
No, only thing is that body needs to be buried to the town/city they were born. If the town doesn't exist anymore then they will be buried to city/town where they lived
Me cause I don't take discord debates that seriously ā ļø
Why is that a rule
does chest hairyness increase the chances for me to be attracted to women?

It's to keep family members close, it's old rule
or just a propaganda
For you to be attractive to women? I don't think so. I would say women like tall guys with pretty face (and that's optional)
not personality?
Personality is the most important thing
Nobody else in my family was born even close to me.
I was born in Arkansas, my mom was born in Tampa, my dad in LA, my grandparents in Chicago, Philadelphia, and Connecticut, and before that it goes to multiple countries š
same
Yeah I don't think so bud.Plus who jokes about stuff after claiming sexualizing people is serious issues to you
I thought you meant looks
Again, did I joke about women? No, I joked about you. I'm a woman myself why would I make fun of me
i have met a lot of women who look absolute eye candy, but after knowing them, it gets kinda turn off
My both parents are born in places where their grandparents lived, so am I
Ong yes
Wild
That's why we get to know people to see if we like them
Indian brain.
exactly
I'm kidding ofc
Not really, my dad has lived here 80% of his life
I'm trying to catch you
?
i feel like im not gonna get someone who is actully hot and talk like the way i want
My dad lived in California, Oregon, Indiana, Oregon again briefly, Nevada, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas again ššš
Lol
@sonic lion your gay
I'm actually asexual lol
*youāre
? That is not an explanation
damn
Rich moment
i can turn on you /j
Thats the correct way to react to a joke
How š
Living little bit everywhere
How is that a joke?
how dare you question my english authority
Canāt even harass someone with proper grammar
Is it past your bedtime
sadly no
You never know, I wouldn't worry about getting a beautiful girl as a man
And if you're fun, youre gonna get someone who matches you
I say that because its incredibly common to see beautiful women with mid men
It was one just accept it and move on w your life
that pisses me off
Me too
dude your gay
LMAO I wish
they're not mid from the girl's pov
I would be way more cool
Maybe they are... some women think that dating a hot men is too much trouble
how do you know your asexual? or you havent heard about smut
women dont liek to watch it, they like to read it
Ok well born in LA, went to Oregon because his dad was racist and Oregon is super white, Indiana for school (went into debt for a few decades to pay it off), back to Oregon to live with parents after school, moved to Nevada for work, moved to Arkansas to be with my mom (ngl my mom is a dumbass for moving from Nevada to Arkansas), Oklahoma for work, Arkansas because the old job would pay more lol.

I haven't what's that
And I know because I never felt like it yk it makes me uneasy to think I have to do it
i mean if a person's only notable quality is being 'hot' then yeah that'd be trouble
Yeah my exes were way better looking than me lmao
well its like a novel but describing sexual intimacy with high vocabulary
Ooh no, I mean
I read like two erotic ones and the sex were the least interesting part about them but like they had really good literally quality
you should read some bad ones to not be so much engaged with storyline
its like reading porn
I read DH Lawrence's Lady Chatterly's Lover and Elfriede Jelinek's La Pianiaste, they were both incredible
I still don't understand how can you joke about something like that, which is absolutely disgusting of you, but we can move on
I tried reading commercial narrarives before but like I read classics since I was 13, I builed my taste for years and going back it's not fun
Lmfao what
Yes
13

Its like watching a mid movie when you watched Tarkovsky
whats your age now?
Or eating a frozen pizza when you've tasted actual italian pizza
š š
21
holyshit
Have you heard of marquis de sade?
šššššš
He actually invented it
I try reading him but it was boring as hell seriously sex is so boring
Yea
Never heard of him is that where sadism comes from
yea your asexual
Precisely
where do you get your morals from?
He actually wrote extensively about inflicting pain for sexual pleasure and got jailed for it
He wrote 120 days of sodom during the french revolution
he should have checked on decade
Yeah I wouldnāt write about it š
My own feelings and thoughts about what's right or wrong I guess
so what is right?
What I feel it is. There is also the law
so your basing it on feelings
Yeah
define morality
Pretty much
Not marrying baby girls and not abducting women as war booty
What if u had some sort of mental illness
I think it has a lot of definitions
whats yours
Well I'm autistic and depressed so I sure do
Apparently autistics have strong sense of justice
Fellow depressed autistic person š«”
U don't have to trust your feelings to build a moral campus then
Pretty much
u can't say anything
Lmao adios
Bye
Watch me
But I do feel bad when I do something wrong
Not smoking or drinking but yk, hurting someone etc
I don't even know how to formulate it
I just try to be a kind person and a goor citizen I guess
feelings are not relable path to jsutice
I agree, but thats how I act on my own private life
your just saying words
We have law and ethics for a society
šæ
Help your fellow atheist buddy
Iāll jump in if it gets spicy
@sonic lion they're dragging you into subjective morality vs objective morality(religious one).
They believe w/o objective morality people are morally corrupt.
Is the act good because you feel it is good, or do you feel it is good because it is good?
š š
Again, my own life experience
Reflection with philosophical texts, my studies in humanities, literature and being exposed from different perspectives... but none of this is telling me how to act, it's according to how I feel about it at the end of the day
What do you think of Machiavelli
Depending how you define good. It's good if there's a gain for someone? It is bad if someone loses something?
Then tell us
A slave owner gaines all benefit from slaving slaves.
my morality is based on wellbeing of humans
as a whole in conclusion
is a injection hurting the baby good?
And the slave?
For a moment I thought you were throwing Hegel at me
but the slave owner would jsutify it has good, bc hes feeling good
Good for the mommy š
So the slave would justify it is bad because they feel bad
I don't really see the point
Being good at the disgrace of others is no win
thats why i base it in well being of humans
Good and evil are not clear-cut choices; there is evil that is inevitable and good that is harmful, and vice versa. What determines this is instinct of the humans ( comes from whatever u believe in)
Oh I get it why you had trouble with my definition, you thought I was being some selfish prick
Harm is pretty clear and dry. Reciprocity and Harm.
prove no god
Instinct? My man Nietzsche would say otherwise
What if I'm Jesus Christ and all morality is based on what is right for me
I see morals as bullshit so I guess I donāt care because thereās no objective way to measure anything, so I donāt really use morality to justify anything but rather to explain the outcome of things if that makes any sense.
LMFAO I love this dialog
im not following that, i want a morality which adds all the humans
My morality is based on guns
What if the outcome is in your favor
Who has the most gun whoās the justice
Hail CCP
And he is
I'm just saying if Jesus is the personification of love then all morality is based on it, it can't be selfish
Practically that's true
Whoeverās favor it is in is irrelevant
power comes from gun
You may want to have the outcome in your favor
You have adopted Minecraftism
Ok but Iāve done some bad things so if my version of morality reflects me as perfect I would argue itās functionally useless
Always been my point on morality specifically
Then we are comrades
Itās time to be side by side and abolish the constitution
@real lily you can ping anyone here too
Who tf is olivander
@real lily here as well
i dont give a shit until you prove me there is a jesus and he is all loving
š«”š«”š«”
Swede
š š
That was not what I meant, I don't even think there is a Jesus
Anyhow
my defintion is well being of all humans and thinking creatures, not just one god
I wanted to talk about the categorical imperative but Kant was a christian so I might contradict myself
š
Lmfao
bc in the past, jesus had noahs ark, which killed all the people on earth, including those innocent children who haven't done anything wrong
hes practily a genocider
@grok concise it for me
gpt it
Actually I was thinking about Feuerbach's the essence of Christianity, where he argues that religion is men projecting parts of himself into an exterior divine being
In that logic, Jesus is a symbol for love
I wasn't talking the religious Jesus but what humanity consideres the highest of itself, love
Can morality be bas3d on love?
š ā¹ļø š¢
The quote unquote
There's a prerequisite for it, be a Christian first
what kind of love says you gotta believe this or we are executing you
Lmao sorry
i thought he was just ugly on the outside
nope
if my morality is based on love, would you inject a vaccine in a 2 year old with gonna inflict pain?
Yeah but Feuerbach makes a distinction between God, the holy spirit and Jesus. Jesus is solely love
Yea
Suffering for a purpose
isnt pain opposite of love
No, its hate
Pain is necessary to sustain life
anyways i think morality should be abour well being, and not some love, good, bad, feelings
I was thinking about it because I read bell hooks's all about love and she debates it
The idea that love is an action and so on
Love is not a feeling for her
It's action, comprimse, respect etc
shouldnt i let all those vulnerable kids die so only the kids with immunity would survie to make better continution of a species?
Personally I wouldn't lol
Morality is a fucking tool used by authority to regulate stupid guys for their own interest
Somebody would believe that following moral would help their case
so you should change your definition
What a fucking naive thought
Add on
Killing men of other faiths/tribe thereafter abducting their women as war booty and keeping them as sex slaves.
You're doing good.
here come the thinker
But morality usually contradicts whatever they're doing to maintain power
are you vegan
I mean he's kinda right, condemning violence for instance only serves the people in power since rebellion would feel wrong
That's why I understood him then lol
No, are you?
btw government dont function on morals they have laws
im not
what justifies you killing and eating animals?
Do you think eating meat contradicts your morals?
