#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 757 of 1
I never said I think you are an polytheist to begin with, I just thought the idea was a little bit interesting, But why would you even bother trying to prove an hypothetical scenario when you don't even believe in that.
And If you are forced to use assumption to prove it, It ain't proof.
Just delusion.
Again, it's to disprove the claim that only one can god exist. I explored that hypothetical to show that yes multiple gods can exist. If you don't realize, I was talking to that Muslim fella and the claim of pure monotheism is foundational in their faith.
But that's an hypothetical scenario, Not the truth.
Ok, I know. And?
I really don't understand you š
I mean, what conclusion are you trying to reach?
Pfft, Sure, You can't disprove something if you use assumptions.
Just a simple one, That you are just wasting your time on a hypothetical scenario where you change it a lot of times to fit your idea.
And I'm not using assumptions. I'm saying that scenario is possible and therefor it disproves the claim that "multiple gods cannot exist". I hope you get me now.
Then they are idiots as well, I understand where you are coming from but It's just foolish to fight a fool on foolish things.
If u admit your scenario isnāt real and u donāt believe in it, then it canāt disprove anything. A made up example isnāt evidence against monotheism
He's just saying that as an possibility not reality
sannnaaa
There's a possibility that there's a teapot on Mars but it doesn't mean it's true.
Yes
Yeah, I see no issues.
Saying something is possible is not evidence. A possibility u imagined doesnāt disprove anything. If u admit the scenario isnāt real and u donāt believe in it, then it canāt be used to reject monotheism. A made up scenario isnāt a counter argument
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh my fellow sister
my sundays going great i have family over today though
wbu?
we are charli kirk we carry the flame
we fight for the goyspel to
honour his name
stfu
Bc if multiple gods had unlimited power, their actions would overlap and conflict And if they have limits, they arenāt actually gods Thatās why the idea doesnāt hold logically
make me
i gonna buy them all tho
Hello I'm new here
Not here bro go back to refugees
ŁŲ§ Ł Ų¹Ų§ŁŁŲ©
because there is so much religions as far as we know, if you live in a village and a tribe community isolated outside of world yes you 100 percent believe your own religion and there is one god
If they always think the same and have the same goals, then they arenāt separate gods theyāre just one will copied several times.
If they donāt think the same, then conflict is possible.
Either way, the idea of multiple gods doesnāt hold up
Iran
cross + mashallah
did i miss a new update or smth
gow and gow ragnarok
wonderful games
?av 1415831159035789454
nice
Goyspel? 
we call it supreme leader š
?av 612164889095438337
Doesn't work @dense agatešššššššššššš
okay i will try
Looking different or living in different places doesnāt matter. If they have the same mind and same goals, they arenāt separate gods. If they have different minds, then conflict is possible. Appearance and location donāt change that
sheās muslim on the weekdays christian on weekends
we shia together
mashallah
on wallahi things are gonna get lit
no yahudism, dang
Clones arenāt the same bc they have different minds and can make different choices. If ur gods also have different minds, then conflict is possible. If they have identical minds and never disagree, then they arenāt truly separate gods...ur example proves my point, not yours
Christians being fluffy with Muslim fundamentalists is something that I'd never understand. It reaches some weird levels some times. Back in the days when Sam Paty got murdered, I saw some Egyptian Christian priests put that Ų„ŁŲ§ Ų±Ų³ŁŁ Ų§ŁŁŁ "anything but the prophet of Allah" filter on their Facebook pfps, and it made me wonder, mfs if you think he was prophet of Allah then why didn't you convert to Islam already š
Twins arenāt the same person bc they donāt share one mind and can make different choices. If ur gods have separate minds, they can disagree. If they share one mind, they arenāt separate gods
Nice mental gymnastics devil
Thanks for the compliment, you are masters in it.
Top of the top.
It's a big thing to be acknowledged by the professionals.
If they have different minds, the chance of different goals always exists. Calling them maximally rational doesnāt remove that.. Rational beings can still choose different priorities or methods. If disagreement is impossible, then they donāt have independent minds, and they arenāt separate gods
They could, doesn't mean they necessarily do
If they are as smart as a god would be they wouldn't disagree
It wasnāt a compliment. Mental gymnastics is what uāve been doing the whole time by dodging the actual logic
You geniunely didn't realize I was being sarcastic? Oh my god.
You failed to convince three people here of your point, and still keeps going.
And trying to pin the blame on us for not agreeing with your mess of a logic.
If they can make different choices, then conflict is possible. Saying they never would is just an assumption. Rational and omniscient beings can still choose different priorities or methods. If disagreement is impossible, then they donāt have independent minds, and they arenāt separate gods
Even one god could disagree with itself if it's omnipotent
Does that mean it will disagree just because it can
But is your god the same god?š§š§š§
Their god already changed rules and teachings and they have a term for it.
Idk how some people have a difficult time understanding omnipotence
If it's omnipotent and omniscient then there are no limits in the way the power and capabilities would be applied
If they can disagree, conflict is possible. If they canāt disagree, they donāt have independent minds. In both cases, u donāt get multiple real gods
Sarcasm doesnāt answer the argument. Itās not about convincing people, itās about addressing the logic. If u think itās wrong, then show where it breaks instead of dodging it
It would be a divine hivemind, it's not multiple gods but it's not one either. And like I said before, even one god could disagree with itself if it's omnipotent, doesn't mean it necessarily will
š„
Unless the rightmost and most rational choice is to disagree
I already showed enough times, you just aren't convinced. The use of sarcasm was out of frustration of how you keep going with a condescending tone instead of just closing the conversation and accepting that we didn't reach an agreement.
But I guess being a religious often means not being able to tolerate differing views.
Rational doesnāt mean identical. Two perfectly rational beings can still choose different priorities or approaches while both staying rational. So independent minds mean the possibility of different choices, which means the possibility of conflict
ššš
We may not understand why they need to disagree but it's possible
If they share one mind, thatās one being. If they have different minds, disagreement is possible. Thereās no middle state where theyāre many gods but somehow one will
Pando shares one mind, but it's not one being
I also share one mind with myself yet I'm billions of cells at once, those are all different beings
i want to g00n so bad but im holding in šš
u didnāt show anything u used a hypothetical u donāt even believe in, and it never solved the core contradiction. Not agreeing with weak logic isnāt the same as not tolerating views
Somehow you're making up rules and limitations for things that we have no idea about how they'd function, this is like saying that Pegasus couldn't have a horn on the forehead because it would hurt aerodynamics and couldn't evolve it
it is not sleeping gng
Coming to the same conclusion every time means they donāt have independent minds. At that point itās one will,.. not multiple gods
what you guys are talking about ?
Lol if all people with normal vision see a car as green and a colourblind man sees it as yellow does that mean they share the same mind or simply that they function as intended
Go g00n away, don't spill it here.
weāll make it out the gc
Pando doesnāt have one mind. Itās a shared root system not a shared consciousness or will. Sharing structure isnāt the same as being one mind
i want to stop g00ning and be a better person š„
im trying to distract myself
islam
Wrong
Even twins with telepathy still have two separate minds. They can think differently and choose differently. Sharing thoughts isnāt the same as sharing one will
god
Now, I'll touch you.
The root is where a plant's mind is
You only had one chance, you aren't escaping touching.
Reaching the same solution every time means their will is identical. If the will is identical, thatās one mind, not multiple gods. Perfect intelligence doesnāt erase individuality unless theyāre not separate beings to begin with
No, that simply means they know the truth and the best solution
Nelson Mandela explained it perfectly
RIP Nelson Mandela
Now say in 2010 god is driving a purple PT cruiser, how does that change this?
He didnt die
If all my homies and I don't walk off the volcano every single time yet a mentally ill guy takes a bath in a volcano just to disagree with us doesn't mean he has individuality, just that he's fucking stupid
He did
the truth is that America and china are the strongest countries so we have to follow what they do š„
If they have their own wills, then the possibility of choosing differently always exists. Saying they always choose the right action is just assuming perfect agreement, not proving it. Independent wills mean disagreement is possible
Roots arenāt a mind. Plants donāt have a shared consciousness or a unified will so the example doesnāt apply to the idea of multiple godss
It's an example of individuality versus being a group, wouldn't change a single thing about it being s possibility
We are pivoting to another topic like this
You jinxed the guy š
Knowing the best solution isnāt the issue. If they always reach the exact same conclusion with the exact same will, then they donāt have independent wills. Thatās one will expressed many times, not multiple gods
one is already enough to make a lot of people suffer ššnow we are getting multiple ????
Too many atheists here, do you want me to get involved bro
Put me in coach
imagine 4 gods and all of them decided that you are gonna be touched today š„
It's called convergence, doesn't mean it's the same mind and you failed to make a point in favour of it so far
A morally perfect being doesnāt choose wrong bc its nature is perfect, not bc it lacks the ability to choose. That still means one will. Multiple independent wills would not be identical by naturee
Greece gameplay
Pay the Jizyah while you are at it too š
Your example still doesnāt work because plants donāt have a shared mind or a unified will. Without a shared consciousness, it canāt support the idea of multiple gods acting as one
I'm about to "troll" debil
My network is bad
are you from iraq ?
Dw bro I can handle them
Yes bro
Restart your wifi
My example wasn't to prove that a mythological concept could work because of a biological one, just that a group can still share the same organ
olivander is here to refute all atheists and prove to the world that there's no god but allah
Enshallah āš»šš»
šš»good luck brother
They can't engage with me though they just call me a troll to dismiss any fair criticism š¢š
they are scared from the truth
turkish spelling š its over before it even started
š„
He is ragebaiting.
Wait a min wtf is wrong with the star on your role
idk bro
"They can't engage with me though they just call me a troll to dismiss any fair criticism š¢š"
- Me, a minute ago
i picked the first yellow icon
The I can't stand for anything I say so I deleted my past messages get on my nerves
Being an atheist doesn't make you more intellectual or logical than a religious person, regardless of which topic it's being measured on
yahoo big summer blowout
Woah my old messages are still there?
What if I did
Shocking
That includes discussing religion, and you/you guys have claimed it
lmfao
Incoming Israeli propaganda
You don't realize it, he thinks (or just trolling Idk but some people are stupid to that level so hard to determine) that we think we are smarter than religious people just because we discuss religion.
Be me
Make a claim
Provide evidence for it
"He's ragebaiting/trolling"
How
It doesn't necessirly have to be like that, y'know.
Atheism
Have I ever claimed you are trolling before?
It's genuinely worrying
I talked to many religious folk here, some normal, some unhinged, but Oli is the first one to be labelled as a troll by me because his behavior is genuinely trolling often (if not always lol).
Or at the very least appears so, that would be revealing about his intelligence if it's the case.
Nope.How is e-dating going for you,no offense
if ur so upset why dont u just stop interacting with him
or ignore him
or block him
idk
theres just so much more you could do than keep being upset that someone is ātrollingā
Maybe you didn't notice but he once claimed he converted to some religion, he used to larp as a Shia Muslim and even had an entire conversation with a Muslim member where he claimed to be a Shi'i Muslim.
Oh my God.....
uh oh!
@abstract night Im still waiting
Wassup
He is annoying but entertaining too tbh, because some people are just too stupid that they seem to be trolling and it sometimes appears to be the case with him.
Me neither
Welcome back
idk bro ur overcomplicating things
u sound like my ex gf

Literally keep proving my point ššš
Maybe it's lack of intelligence maybe it's trolling Idk š
@fresh flower All of this just because you are a shia
Should I report them for harassment š¢š
This guy is MrSheen he changed his name to troll
hahaahahha
Is chika lesbo
He deletes his messages too, Idk why but if you wanna troll there are other ways.
@abstract night why are you doing that?
so he can't be seen as inconsistent
How inconsistent is he, I wonder?
yeah I am
I guessed this.
thought so
whyd you say ex gf then earlier
Whats goin on ?
Egg dumplings and vegetarian soup
why not
That's the funny part bro, I only rp as Shiaš
How many times have you changed your beliefs recently?
ya hussain
stop confusing me 
@turbid dome
yes?
You became a feminist?
Why does this nelson guy chat so weird like he is trying to be formal,do you think he is using Ai
I'm not quite sure but I don't think AI is likely
Do you know Chris eubank
no
I feel like it's not about how it's currently understood, but how it's portrayed by its opponents. If you believe men are women deserve equal rights in the sense of providing them with equal opportunities and acknowledging that men and women aren't rigidly tied to gender roles, then you are a feminist.
Should the pro women footballers paid the Same as the pro men footballers
Don't you think I'm a dishonest evil person or something like that?
You are though

I just wanted your opinion on this should they be paid the same
Bruh why do you want it if you have no bit of respect toward me?
Why are you avoiding the question, should they be paid the same or not, š§
Yo
Not avoiding the question but avoiding engaging with you.
Hello
Wssup
Yes or no
Should they be paid equally
Thing about women sports is, they have lower viewer rates. I think feminism needs to focus on equal pay when the effort being made is equal.
Not all women sports of course, women's MMA has high view rates and women in MMA get paid equally. But women's soccer is one of the sports that aren't doing well financially and therefor don't give the players in it similar pay to men.
Omggg zazuuuuuu
Lavvvvvvv long time
Yeahhhhhhh how areeee uuuuuuu
I love that pfp
He loved us
Are you dumb how should they be paid equally they don't bring in that kind of revenue
Fantastic, what about you
Eh Alhamdulilah just studying and stuff howās life been lately
Ehh average nothing new,you still afraid of lizards
I don't understand
You want to pay them equally, how
You're welcome: women athletes being paid more relative to their current revenue makes sense because it helps correct past discrimination, builds a stronger talent pipeline, and can grow future viewership and overall sports revenue
I am not opposed this,I would actually like to see it happen
This doesn't work btw
How will it not work
The key issue here is that most women aren't into sports and are even less interested in watching it
hi guys
Our womens FA has been active and funded since 1973
Both girls and boys are more or less forced into sports in Sweden, very few women do end up transitioning to it professionally despite the structure being there for it
This is changing as the years pass like in my country more women are getting more interested in sports
They won't be paid the same because sponsors aren't interested in paying as much for less viewership, and there's no stigma whatsoever regarding women in sports as far as Sweden goes
Girls or women?
You have, but there's no mention of who's funding it, corporations won't do it because there's nothing for them to gain, a government could chip in, but there's no benefits to it
Sorry,I meant girls
Yeah that's common and normal everywhere though, but it doesn't transition to adult women in/watching sports because the audience and interest just isn't there
At least not on men's scale, so the payout will never be the same
A ROI from what?
Investing in grassroots sports is commonplace for corporations, the only ones who benefit from it are those who invest in men's football/hockey/basketball
But here they do watch sports both girls and women especially football compared back in 2016-2010 era when you couldn't even find a girl or a woman that was interested in watching football
In my country
Goodnight everyone and the swedish Somali
The others are irrelevant when it comes to feminism
Sleep well my Shia prince š¤
Dhimmi 
Watching or playing sports has nothing to do with religion though, even Saudi Arabia has a multi-tier women's football setup with leagues and divisions, are you attributing cultural norms to religion?
A lot of conversations about religion here talk about religion but still distant from it. Like, someone would say "religion says this, religion doesn't say that" without getting into the meat and seeing what the texts and scholarly views say, y'know, the things that the religion actually consists of? There's much ignorance around religion.
If you're referring to patriarchal norms, religion didn't create them, it existed long before them, it's not anything inherent to faith itself, even though you can argue that religions are sexist to some degree. Less religious people doesnāt necessarily mean less patriarchal norms
You can be religious and feminist though, unless the religious is extremists and the feminism whatever the current trend in the US is among liberals
You can be religious and psycopath
Dawg what does that have to do with anything š
Sociopath = psycopath
Everything
Dexter Morgan pfp btw
Someone want to talk bout id god exist or not (I want to improve my inglish)
Sociopath just feel more them psycopath
What do you believe?
How can you prove the existence?
What is your religion
If you want we can talk about in a call to improve my speaking too and I am Muslim but that's doesn't matter first of all we need to talk bout id there is something or no then we can talk about which one is the true religion
Nah
Both terms, psychopath and sociopath aren't scientific from what I know. The scientific term used is ASPD anti-social personality disorder.

Proceed
Go ahead, I'm interested.
Idk
Go ahead, I'm interested.
I thought "hey why Nobu doesn't post", searched for his message history and he is muted as usual 
Idk why they don't get it over with and ban his ass.
First of all. We need to think obout how it was created the universe ( explosion of materia and antimateria "Big Bang") but I ask you where is coming from that materia and antimateria that is my first fact we could thing bout the The law states that matter is neither created nor destroyed, but that doesn't negate the fact that a force, which obviously cannot arise from nothing, could have caused the bug to explode. Bang, that's my first fact.
To understand that there had to be something, or at least that's how I see it
He is insufferable when you interact with him, and keeps posting the same stuff every time with the same silly emojis.
What if universe created itself
Or always existed
It wasn't an explosion, that's one thing you got wrong.
The Big Bang wasnāt an explosion in space. It was the sudden emergence of space itself. It wasnāt the shattering of a quiet silence by a noise, but rather the birth of all noise and silence together.
https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/what-really-happened-at-the-big-bang-the-origins-of-everything-explained
Or maybe it was created by someone. If we don't stop to look at our galaxy, we can see that everything is perfect for us to live in, not only that we are in the perfect place, but also that
Ye
God doesn't depend on anything to exist; he wasn't created, he didn't arise, he simply is. If we think he was created, we could ask the same question about that creator, and that's not true. God is simply eternal.
Other planets also help our survival, like Jupiter, and there is a constant balance in the universe due to black holes and energy explosions.
If god simply is, why couldnāt the same be true for other things?
Besides, in our universe there aren't just a few perfect things, but everything is perfect. Just look at biology; everything is perfect, so it's not a coincidence.
Brian and stewie used a time machine to make big bang
If everything is perfect then why do species go extinct?
Depends on how you look at object
Everything is perfect but the humans no God it doesn't Make decisions for us; our decisions led the world to this.
This question could be logic if only that kinda god you are talking had a beginning
Imo the best answer to this conversation will be the moment in king of the hill, where bobby and hank are talking about flower
Someday all us will know the answer
True
I didn't understand the question
Idk for fun ig
Bc he's beyond everything
I see
God?
The univers is perfect as you know thats why it need to be something that thinks and all that and the big bang was perfect to Each atom itself explodes, and they all explode simultaneously.
Yeah
Guys i had an essay about is tolerance towards people of other religions against your religion
I wanna listen to your answers
The human is curious and God doesn't says that its Haram to be gays god only says that you ar not going to do that actions
Yall
Everything has a resound id gods thing is the better for it it's going to be like that
Imo it's kinda psychological thing
Ye the people has curiost and they want to try something new and sometime they like it
Do muslims ascend if we are talking in perspective of christianity or other way around
?
I share your thoughts friend
But can someone answer to my question? I am curious about your replies
The islam is a true religion if yo want I can send you a lot of facts about science that it waited in the quran
And everything int the book is perfect no contradiction
Yo i have a question, did prophert Muhammad had a wife?
Ye
How old was she, just curious
18
Ah ok then
Wdym by that
They conted age differently?
Women's age at that time began to be counted from puberty.
Can you be more specific
Wait I go to traductor xd
How old was she if we are talking about modern age counting
Huh?
20-21
Idk to speak good inglish
I'm from spain
Si what do you think obout my logic xd
So*
I only wanted to talk obout the facts and know what the people think
No one understands the logic š?
What your thoughts
Where is Buddha's grave
Good question. Did he really exist
Did Jesus exist
Yes he existed
As for buddha there are few places where u can find the remains of his body
Confucius was a scholar closer to something a great monk type not something divine
It is just that all the followers from different faiths see their
One as divine and believe others are false
Dude Iāve been to a church with catacombs for bishops and stuff
There was also a saintās grave there
it was mad cool
Did I exist
yall wastin ur damn time arguing with people who were put in special ed
What's your encounter point
They are not gonna admit all of scientific research and discovery on earth being not flat
Becoz they're fcking reta rted
Even though they have refused to be agree with nasa research
I did that bro I was down the range with these kind of PPL totall waste of time
You don't have to be shameful about it
how did u lose
yes be ashamed how do u lose a bunch of speds gng
what do u mean
so is their contention that gravity doesnt exist or what
that doesnt even make sense u dont prove a thing exists by assume it as a variable
but then again these people have never heard of the scientific method
they dont accept modern science but under the modern scientific framework it would be gravity and the weak laws of attraction
u "lost" to them cuz they led u around
u simply have to ask them what their reason is
neither is there an experiment that proves that the earth is flat
no its not
their claim is equally a positive claim
because they need to provide a positive claim within their framework to explain why objects fall to the ground
that is not the default position and thats a shite argument
if they believe that their framework is correct at least it has to be coherent
density, which is explained under the scientific system
they reject a coherent system for one which is far less coherent and simply brushes ideas off for being inconclusive with their bad logic
less dense surely
then its not at the same temperature and pressure since theres less of it
surely these questions can be answered by a google search
the problem is not that they are asking questions but that they do not have a counterfactual model
no u just have to answer tards with the tard way
it doesnt matter since the scientific position is far more nuanced and coherent than theirs and therefore its way easier to end up requiring an answer that u wouldnt be expected to know
thats just straight up bs obviously
and if u didnt challenge that then uve lost
the default assumption itself assumes two things
one that the default can be defined, which we know to be false since the default is a human concept and not a natural concept
and secondly that there can be a default assumption at all and that it should have more credence / truth value, which is simply untrue in any formal philosophical system of truth
they have just as much burden to prove a counterfactual
no u cant because they are challenging the physics / basic science framework
u cant prove a system using itself
just like u cant say god is real because the bible said so
the argument against a flat earth is very simple, under a coherentist framework the modern science view has way more credence and is therefore true, there is no other way to justify it vs a flat earth argument
from a pragmatist definition of truth the scientific framework also wins
basically all of physics
if ur sped enough to think gravity doesnt exist
and thats why nobody will ever convince them, because experiments provide data which can be perceived under any kind of framework that is sufficiently pliable
eg if data shows that the earth has curvature they can simply update their beliefs to suggest that the earth is a flat manifold in hyperbolic space or some bs like that
u cant the prove that the earth is or isnt flat using an experiment without first assuming all the prior laws of physics, which they disregard
so its pointless
whether it does or not is irrelevant, this is purely a philosophical thing
u cant prove god's existence using the bible
yes and no, depending on what your theory of truth is
i believe in coherentism, but that would be correct under a pragmatist theory
i think coherentism is much stronger
well then they need to provide an alternative explanation or set of physical laws, as ive explained
Just ask them a simple question
Like why can people in different time zones experience sunrise and sunset at completely different times if the Sun is supposedly always above a flat plane?
That works too lowkey
werent u banned
My lawyer too powerful
lemme fuhh...
Flat Earth vc is chill though they're almost all nice
Except for that woman, she's mean
thats straight up restarted cuz then the sun's umbra would be a cardioid
You gotta keep asking questions and let them fumble, it's easy, they try to bait you by talking about science stuff you wouldn't know about. Just ask them if the sun is creating a caustic pattern like light in a coffee cup, why does the sun physically move in the sky along a measurable arc instead of staying in one place and only projecting patterns?
ask them to explain the curvature of the earths "walls" then
Play their game, ask them questions
the sun would cast a shadow that looks like a heart shape
yo gng i lowkey fw u like u give off chill pdf vibes
no, this is just a direct implication of their caustic explanation
Do they even have any rebuttal against the Dinosaur Earth theory
if they believe it's a caustic, the sun would cast a heart shaped (cardioid) shadow
Ask them why I in Sweden can see Ursa Major high all year, while for Randy in India it drops low and disappears for hours, and Randy in India see southern stars we in Sweden never see
Jai Hind Jai Bharat Jai Vandemataram
Jai Paul too, has to be the most influental one drop artist of all time
Hi chat
LMFAO
Why
best country in the world
Meow
We need complete deportation against terrorists and stop them from influencing American politics
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Wot ?
I get it it's out of topic
But shouldn't the total sum be 100%?
84+15 = 99%
Often times those numbers are rounded down
So it could be 84.5 and 15.5 as an example
Ohhh
Got it

religion mention
Sharing an organ isnāt the same as sharing a mind or a will. A group can share structure but that doesnāt make their consciousness one And without one shared will, the example doesnāt support multiple gods acting as a single mind
No
Iām using a Hindu example bc itās a real polytheistic system. In Hindu texts, devas like Indra and Shiva sometimes reach different conclusions even with divine knowledge. That shows convergence doesnāt erase independent wills separate gods donāt act as one mind
It's hard, but not impossible
One has to work through it and go through what led you to becoming sensitive/what let them to become narcissistic in your environment as a child
@manic juniper This isnāt just my view. Philosophers from Islam, Christianity nd Judaism all said the same thing in their own books. Ibn Sina in The Metaphysics of the Healing showed that two necessary beings would be identical, so they would be one. Al Ghazali in The Incoherence of the Philosophers explained that two unlimited wills canāt both have total control. Maimonides in The Guide for the Perplexed wrote that a perfect being canāt have a rival. Aquinas in Summa Theologiae added that if two gods had unlimited power, each could block the other. All of them reached the same conclusion only one true God is logically possible
...
...
Somehow I missed ur messages earlier, so Iāll reply now. One being cannot disagree with itself bc it has one will. Disagreement requires two independent minds. And changing a rule isnāt contradiction itās still one will acting over time. None of this supports the idea of multiple gods
Wasn't ibn Sina accused of disbelief by ibn al Qayyim?
Yes, Ibn al Qayyim did accuse Ibn Sina of atheism but that doesnāt change his argument. Ibn Sina still argued clearly that only one necessary God can exist. An accusation doesnāt erase the logic he wrote
Btw Itās funny how u skipped all the actual arguments and only replied to the one side point about Ibn Sina That doesnāt answer anything I said about the logic itself. If ur position was strong, u wouldnāt need to dodge the main points

You still don't realize I don't want to engage with you on that? We already went over it and you spoke to me with a condescending tone, we reached a point where either one of us can convince the other so I said let's move, but you didn't move on it seems.
You've been talking about the same exact thing for a couple of days now.
And you failed misrably to convince three people of your views until now, and still want to keep going.
Bet
You will get crushed lil bro
Anyway
soooo as an artist I think the ai art thieves must be punished for their crimes against Hayao Miyazaki and THUS we are setting more poison art traps to speed up their model collapse :) :) :) Yay!
ā My book Unfamiliar is available here! -
Barnes & Noble - https://tinyurl.com/34ptwkkb
Amazon - https://tinyurl.com/453hd6zk
Merch Store ā cro...
š
life is amazing
whatās that symbol in your role icon mean
Always
Anyone who has strayed from their true self seeks to reunite with their essence
Ig so
Did something occur in your life that gave you this view
Obv
I donāt even know
Going to change it
Birthday cakes
Two consenting adults of the same sex -> ultimate evil
A man in his 50s sleeping with a 9 years old child -> you are falling in presentism fallacy š¤ it was actually normal back then and actually girls at that age are/were hot and pathologizing sexual attraction to minors is western propaganda 
Yaa
Umm wtf
Well the only argument that i can have here that people's lifespan was shorter
That's why they married youbg girls
But f pdf
Hope they will all die
In torment
People back then had it rougher and their knowledge was way more limited than us, but problems arise when one considers them to ultimately be better than us and try to apply their values and structures in the present.
Yeah
āAlso Europe did itā
I donāt think European monarchs were/are good people.
Not being intolerant but didnt this happen to prophert muhhamed? (I respect all religions) didnt he marry a little kid from present view but a woman if we are talking about that period?
@slender coral
Everyone was shit back then

It comes from the assumption that people they talk to also sanctify some historical figures like them. When they talk about what they believe "atheistically" wrong and right, they'd tell you something along the lines "your atheist scholars" in parallel to how they parrot the opinions of their scholars and what they call "people of knowledge". It's all a projection.
@slender coral
Hi
You aren't being intolerant at all, I was referring particularly to Mohamed. Yes he did that and yes a lot of Muslims today defend it unfortunately.

Open it
Aint opening sus links lil bro
Something Iāve noticed quite a bit
It's safe. Has https and the link has the domain of youtube youtu.be.
This is AI slop
@potent tide again open
Later
It's AI slop dude, what suggestions do you want?
Open it see and tell me how to improve it and add in it.
How old are you and what are you planning to specialize in?
Are you in school or university?
Why does a white woman have an Indian accent
Idk
U keep announcing uāre done like itās a victory lap, but u only ever reply to the soft points and dodge the ones tht actually matter. Then the moment u think u spotted smtg small to poke at, u sprint back in Thatās not confidence thatās selective bravery. If u rlly had a solid reason for leaving Islam, u wouldnāt be running laps around the main question, and uk that if u keep stay in the discussion, the gaps in your reasoning will be exposed
Indian accent is the easiest accent
Takes a bit of getting used to
Omfg, you were the one who literally kept announcing an alleged victory 
You don't know the difference between disengaging and claiming victory?
The latter is something you kept doing.
Delete the video and start over, make something human.
@slender coral Oka .it is fell 90% human
What do you mean the voice over and the visuals are AI š
That's a lot already.
Oka
I'm not even sure you wrote or generated the script.
I'm glad my existence is irritating to some people 
I didnāt see this earlier, but itās obvious u werenāt trying to make a point u were fishing for a reaction. When some1 has real arguments, they donāt need to dress history in shock value lang to make it sound worse. Thatās what ppl do when theyāve run out of facts. If u ever decide to argue without hiding behind exaggerations, then we can talk
I never announced a victory. I pointed out that u were avoiding the main arguments. Thatās not victory claiming, thatās calling out selective replies. uāre trying to reframe it because addressing the actual points is harder than arguing about tone
Itās not ur existence that irritates ppl itās the way u try to get attention by saying things u canāt defend. If u ever argued in good faith nobody would care
Idk why you consider a random sarcastic post is evidence that I'm not willing to engage seriously, but ok. Yeah we can talk, and while the message was sarcastic I guess you can see my points through it, you can ask if you need clarification on anything. Do you think Mohamed's relationship was justified, normal only in his context, or that he actually didn't marry Aisha when she was 9 years old?
It's only religious folk who have a stance ranging from dislike to hate towards me, that tells you something.
If u want a real discussion, then drop the sarcastic framing and ask the question normally.
As for the history early Islamic sources report different ages for Aisha, not just one number Some narrations say 9, some say older, and later scholars disagree on which is strongest. And whatever the exact age was, it was judged by the norms and legal systems of that time, not by modern standards...If u want to talk seriously, u have to acknowledge historical context instead of forcing modern labels onto a very different era
Itās not about religion. Anyone would react the same way to some1 who jumps between sarcasm and bait instead of sticking to an argument. If u dropped tht behavior, nobody would have an issue with u
Oli is a Shia larper so his opinion doesn't count 
When the argument gets too heavy, u always switch to labels. That tells us exactly who ran out of points
I would just ignore him
I could ignore him, but that would let him think he actually made a point. Iām not here to boost his confidence
bad arguments need to be checked If no one pushes back heāll keep repeating the same nonsense
Okay,did he tell why he left islam, and as you can see the moment you prove him wrong he goes ghost
I'm going to university you lifeless idiot. I'll respond when I return.
But arguing with such people is a waste of time,they will never change
Lifeless says the one who's whole life is obsessesing over Muslims
No, he never gave a real reason Every time I asked, he dodged it or changed the topic and yea the moment the logic corners him, he disappears. Thatās been his pattern the whole time
Iām not arguing to change him. Iām arguing so his bad points donāt stand unchallenged. Some ppl wonāt change, but leaving their claims unanswered just encourages them
He has been like this since I met him on here,no valid reason just hate and obsession over Muslims his whole personality is about being an ex Muslim
It is literally sad
Ppl like him always follow the same pattern loud attitude, no real substance and a constant need to prove smtg They depend on reactions bc thatās the only way they feel relevant
@cursive sphinx boi, where u at
Anyone watching Dear X here?
No where can I watch it?
Cry about it
why this guy always be mad
Who?
????
ig he live up to his name
@shell hemlock Zazu is also causing problems he gets muted every 3 days
so
what now
i didnāt even mention zazu
But you said something against devil lol
yeah what abt itššš
??? ššš
mods have logs btw
š„ŗ
Go for it
iām cryig
I wish I had even a quarter of his confidence
Uh, last I checked, on the Sunni side of Islamic life, her age is pretty solidly 6 at marriage, 9 at consummation, and 18 at Muhammadās death. All Hadith are Sahih and theyāre repeated with different chains of narration.
https://sunnah.com/search?q=Nine+years+old
The other problem is that Muhammad seems to hold a double standard in this matter. Because when Abu Bakr and Abdullah bin Buraidah ask for Fatimah, he tells them that sheās too young for them.
Which means that he knows itās not customary for a 50 year old man to take a nine year old girl.
Now, if youāre Shia, thatās a different story. But Shia have other problems.
What problems do shias have
Enlighten us
Who's watching Dear X here?
Yeah? What's about it
You donāt have a problem with it?
Ofc not
Hey goy
Do you have an issue with prostitution?
Right. And the answer is yes to both.
Yeah
I see where you are going
There you go, then.
Mutah with it's rules is not like this
Wasting your time on goyim?
just having fun
Okay, aside from a piece of paper and a blessing from an Imam, tell me how mutah is different from prostitution.
Welcome to the real world, my friend.
Why are you accused of sucking the blood of babies wherever you go?
It's a temporary marriage
with several conditions and legal rulings that i can't summarize currently
but it's exactly like an Islamic marriage,
If you're taking your words form sunnies resources and websites that's a different story
Wow! Straight to the most anti-Semitic come back you could possibly make. Iām not engaging with you anymore. š
He's a khamas member obviously
I was waiting for you to say antisemitic,
Welldone
Hey choosen one where are you?
Right, so itās a temporary engagement between two consenting parties where the exchange of sexual services is offered for payment.
How is this not prostitution in a different wrapping?
A sunni masquerading as a jew, what a time
And if itās exactly like an Islamic marriage, that just goes to show how degraded the Shia view of marriage really is.
The way you're phrasing it is wrong from the beginning
Every relationship between two people is a prostitution According to you
What distinguishes this marriage from another thing you've mentioned is its legitimacy
Mutah is sanctioned in our tradition through hadiths and verses, and it has conditions and laws, and this is what distinguishes it
One of the conditions, for example, is announcing the marriage publicly
And the "iddah " concept
You gotta read the Practical fiqh Messages of our scholars about it
Talking nonsense about something you don't have enough knowledge about is just absurd
I can't criticize Christianity because i haven't studied it's core
I can't just throw different verses and call it a debate
But you can. And you should
No
Clearly youāve never been to Jerusalem.
And, yes, if Hamas is hiding in a church, destroy it. Weāll rebuild. Free Gaza from the tyranny of Islam! Make a Christian state!
Not like this
Not in here
Booooooooooooooring
Oh, you really donāt want to go to iddah, my friend. That will end badly for you.
" but there was huzbollah there "
Then if itās Hezbollah in the church, get the Christians out if you can and bring that roof right down on their heads.
Weāll rebuild.
He's clearly not a Christian
I saw that coming
Good goy
So, how do you say Iām not a Christian when you asked me exactly nothing about my faith? A Christian is a follower of Jesus Christ who trusts in His sacrifice for the remission of sins and justification before the Father.
Or do you think that all ātrueā Christians are pushovers and pacifists?
Idk
I might be blind
Yeah go on
Itās a tag for a different server.
Iām Messianic Jewish. So, yes. Iām Christian in that I follow Yeshua haMashiakh and Iām Jewish because I do exactly what Jesusā followers did and I practice the Torah. Iām also Assyrian Hebrew, so by lineage, I have Jewish blood.
Acts 21:20
And they said to him, āYou see, brother, how many myriads of Jews there are who have believed, and they are all zealous for the lawā¦ā

In short
What should we call you?
just from my opinion i think there are possible reason as to why some people support israel and most of them are related to opposition towards islam & muslims
It also has a lot to do with the Bible and people who believe the Bible holding that the establishment of Israel is fulfillment of prophecy.
You can call me BarEprem.
elaborate
I finally saw Jews here.
the server tag/server he is in seems like a troll server icl
like an edgy dark humor-ish kind of server
people should learn to use simple sentences on discord
itās not a business email š
(i learned that in class today)
Nope.
And the state of Israel is not committing genocide, if that was where you were going next.
Islam on the other hand, is, by definition, a genocidal religion. And Hamas is a genocidal organization. As is anyone who chants āfrom the river to the seaā.
Because, unlike this generation that tosses their brains in the trash over what an algorithm tells them, I know how to do actual research.
islam is a genocidal religion š
šššššš
mass murdering innocent children isnāt genocide ? š
Surah 9:5, Surah 9:29
If you think thatās whatās happening, then you are horrifically misinformed.
letās talk about your definition of genocide first before we jump to religion because we have different beliefs and itās only right to state the term we use for āgenocideā
takes up atleast 20 minutes š
what is happening, is there a justifiable reason as to why innocent people should be murdered ?
so something something cleansing huh
No, it will soon return to the embrace of Islam.
Massive killing is cruel, and thats whats happening right now, why do you think islam is genocidal religion meanwhile in islam if theres war happening , islam kept old people , women and child safe.
keep your enemies closer or something the proverb
Unfortunately, there aren't many Christians here.
No, there is no justification for the murder of an innocent person. But innocent people die in war. And when the terrorist organization youāre fighting crosses an international border and starts brutally killing your civilians, hacking them to pieces with machetes, and kidnaps them to use as human shields, then you go to war.
i think there are but not a lot of christians focus on debating too much like muslims do
The number of Muslims determines the content of the chat on this channel.
which is good i think we should keep our relationship with God personal to us
It's determined by quantity, not by religion.
All of ts for 9$ šāšæ
If you want to see Christians engaging in serious discussion, I invite you to the Ask A Christian VC.
you are making a justification right there though, innocent people die in war (?) the innocent civilians arenāt the ones bombing countries so why should they suffer ?
invite more christians
we do have some christians here believe it or not but that one christian usually canāt be taken srsly, so is the other muslim
Because that is the reality of war. I put the blame for the deaths of those innocents squarely on the shoulders of Hamas.
butttt double standards for palestinians ?
they are dying from israel too
Our bravest crusader nobu the great
i absolutely HATE this ššššš
What double standards? If you want to talk about double standards, letās talk about Hamas blocking and raiding food supply lines, hoarding goods from its own people, using them as human shields, and then complaining to the world that Israel is causing starvation in Gaza.
that emoji should be removed
there is one fact though⦠palestinians death toll is much higher than that of the israelisā¦
soooo
Just like Nobu and Minecraft always say the same things, but there are always new Muslims responding to them.
Imagine if the account is based in india
We need this feature fr
No, i would get exposed

Ya think?
The war is IN Gaza. The Israeli military is highly advanced and strategic. So, yes, when you attack an area that has a higher population of one people versus another, then what do you think the statistics are going to show? Please use your brain a little.
okay so many palestinians died compared to israelis so they are more powerful, which means they are using this power to kill innocent civilians 
how can you overlook this and think itās completely justifiable
" bbbbut they are hiding khamas in their pockets"
Gulp
Chat's not safe, evil Sanna is active
maybe their heart made of stone or what
No. Every human life is sacred. Iām very sad about the loss of innocent life in Gaza. But stop blaming the Israelis who were defending their people and trying to rescue kidnapped hostages. The war was the fault of Hamas as was every innocent life that was taken.
Didn't idf kill multiple hostages, pathetic
They also like to wear random women's undergarments, that's pretty weird
Because what started this war was that innocent civilians were butchered and kidnapped and held hostage. Thatās an act of war. And the horrific actions of Hamas fully justify any and all aggressive actions on the part of Israel to bring their people home.
That's so antisomething
āinnocent people die in warā as a justifiable excuse, that is wild
Thatās my antidepressant
Dond you dell me whad to do
iām gonna cry i read that in an accent
Everytime an Israeli tweet something i read it in this accent
Because that's your actual accent
The only nice move of Elon Musk on X was to reveal where youāve registered from
Drop @
She posts fanfic between countries
Human life is sacred. That doesnāt make me a pacifist. I will take any and all lethal action to defend those I love. And I have no problem with anything that Israel has done in Gaza because the justification for their actions is the release of the hostages and the destruction of a genocidal terrorist organization.
Middle aged women and their preferences
I suspect that the war caused them so much psychological stress that they did these strange things.
Excuse me āš»
Ptsd type shi
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
Jorjor will
i want to know, is punjabi a slur or just a term referring to a group of people

It's not a slur
So he was banned
Wtf?
No wonder I didn't see him.

Lmao
Punjabi isnt a slur , but the slur words is āpunjeetā
Please mod dont mute me im just stating statement

lol the fact that having these roles pretty much makes you immune to infractions basically sums up discord
ohhhhhhhh ok that make sense ig i got confused
I don't know why you feel sorry for Minecraft.
i would make a joke about the owner but i already got banned once bc of that so i wonāt 
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONNSSSS MY FRIEEEENDDDD
Because his purpose in coming here was to provoke others, Lmao
I hope he can return soon.
They are indispensable here.
Recommendation Algorithm
what the hell is goysplaining
laughing to myself in the taxi
Recommendation algorithms confine everyone to their own area.
Okay bro, Let me What's religion without serching it up online.

I am asking you a simple question, What's religion?
You mean the definition of religion?
Ofc, what's religion.
My mom is my religion
Okay okay, Now now you do know what's religion, Why are you believing in it?
Though tell me did you ask chatgpt to write this?
What's the issue? I was just asking you questions as you clearly are a religious person.
Group of people
Punjab is a state in India
Amen 
You're better off with repeating the Anima Christi constantly than spouting nonsensical rhetoric 24/7
No, I never said it's ai, I was just clarifying, You clearly are getting frustrated over nonsense.
Have no idea what Solvent is talking about
He's perpendicular to the main conversation at hand to begin with
Good point, My bad, So let's go back to real question again, Why do you believe in religion?
Iām not promoting mass murder. Iām saying what I would do if someone came and harmed my family. That should be a normal response on the part of any rational person.
Clearly, you haven't learnt anything from Genesis 18 š
Any rational person turns irrational and wishes ill onto others just because they are going through a difficult time, lol
Iām not Catholic.
Definitely didn't happen to me and I'm not the most rational person out there
It doesn't matter, you barely seem to be Christian to begin with
Very true
What the heck does God visiting Abraham and giving the promise of Isaac have to do with anything?
I'd like to know your perspective on Arabs in Israel.
Clearly you didn't read the end of the chapter you goof
Then you donāt seem to know much about Christianity.
Hahaha, quite the opposite š
Maybe I should remind you of what Abraham did in Genesis 14.
Why "jew" tag has a dollar sign next to it
Not defeating the allegations
You're right, but that just shows the absurdity and lack of nuance of the book to begin with
But the fact that you're that so persistent to defend such actions with no regard to human life, this is what takes you away from the message of Christ.

You can't borrow that
Isn't the strangest thing Trump in the background image?
And Why do you believe in god?
Refrain from typing that again (metaphorically or rhetorically or poetically or theoretically or any other fancy way)
So an atheist is trying to school a Messianic Jewish rabbi on his religion. Nice.
"Messianic Jewish Rabbi"
A Messianic Jewish Rabbi is also telling us that the normal reaction of people is collective punishment
Sorry, Iām a little confused. What exactly am I prohibited from typing?
What I would do if someone kidnapped my family?
Or the assertion that there are certain wars that are justifiable. Not being snarky. Honest question. Just want to be clear.
Thatās not what I said. I said I would take any means necessary to ensure the safety and retrieval of my family and that I would see such actions as justifiable in self defense and defense of those I love.
Which in your definition, includes indirect justification of collateral damage
Fancy way to dance around collective punishment, not to mention this contradicts a lot of your statements, as I can see them
Second "Christian" to get excommunicated by Sannaš
I would slaughter whoever i had to etc..
I forgot the syntax
bruh
Ah, no problem. Thank you. Sorry for the hyperbole.
šššššš
All good
is drama over ?
Pass me some popcorn too
Just thought I'd leave this here @magic olive
The justification of collateral loss of life is the same justification for any war. War is horrific. But if the war is justified because the enemy has violated the basic principles of humanity, then the loss of collateral life is a tragic by product. And in war, lives are lost. Now, in the conflict, the mitigation for the loss of innocent life is absolutely necessary. But if it does occur, that does not qualify as a valid delegitimization of the war itself.
Mate, Give me some as well.
whats the problem
Got clowns here.
who?
Except Israel also has "advanced military technology" which could easily help focus on actual militant targets
Very old, very well known imagery and sensor technology, that Israel has access to, which are easily useable even with infantry weapons, would've told them that there was a child-sized person in a car, and it probably wouldn't be a good idea to fire, I don't know, 355 bullets
Not you.
i know
- Claim the other extremists are bad
- Using extremism to justify extremism
- "I'm a good extremist"
šæ šæ šæ
i should do a popcorn stall
Care to give me the source on the specific example youāre referring to?
Before the war, Israel didn't treat the Gaza people as human beings, confining them in a massive prison. So it's no wonder the Gaza people didn't treat Israel as human beings either.
Okay bro
at this point, Sure.
Bruh. You clearly donāt know history. Prior to 1967, under what government jurisdiction was Gaza? And if that was such a friendly and amicable relationship, why didnāt they open their border?

Also, you do know that between 2005 and 2023 there was not a single day that rockets and mortars were not fired across that border by Hamas?
Then why did Israel blockade the Gaza coastline as well?
This reminds me of Attack on Titan, where the young people of Gaza wondered what was on the other side of the wall, until one day they crossed it.
Oh, I donāt know, maybe because the people of Gaza elected a terrorist organization for government.
But they kidnapped an idf soldier from his tank š„ŗ
Why are you called āI am Charlie Kirkā and why in Hebrew?
Gotta be may fav levantine race fr
I shouldn't need to š The IDF redacted all their claims that they weren't in the area š
Without anything to show for it.
Here you go though:
US imagery of the area also has shown that Israeli forces indeed were there.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2024/hind-rajab-israel-gaza-killing-timeline/
Source of the image:
https://news.sky.com/story/im-so-scared-please-come-heartbreaking-final-moments-of-girl-5-killed-in-gaza-13229813
There's audio analysis of the rounds as well
https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/the-killing-of-hind-rajab
Btw why is there no "Ask A Jew" Channel?
Wait is that his name
yes
Yeah we should create one just for him
true
Oaky, so lemme get this straight. Hamas crosses an international border, specifically targets innocent civilians, kills them, and then takes hostages back across the border, and you would prefer that Israel does absolutely nothing about it?
Looks like y'all got a lotta question lol
He must've not heard this banger either
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14xmQLiYYuM
Romans 16-19 | Chris Tomlin - Authentic
Track 1: In Love with You: http://youtu.be/jRJB2i6Q2aM
Track 2: Tell Me Who: http://youtu.be/iqBMN7osuFo
Track 3: Romans 16:19: http://youtu.be/14xmQLiYYuM
Track 4: Alle: http://youtu.be/0py_qmwcw64
Buy on Amazon: http://tiny.cc/christomlinmusic
Please visit http://hdccm.com for Christian Films I've bee...
Thank you. Iāll take a closer look.
Halo 3
This is not a good reason.
Why are there still Christians around? Are they the bad ones who got left behind after the recent rapture?
No, Iām saying that Israelās actions in the war do not constitute genocide and are justified on the grounds of Hamasās actions on October 7th.
Fr bro. It's just obvious bias against me because I'm critical to their faith.
What's this?
It's probably comedic on purpose but it's a neo-nazi Belarusian simping on middle eastern woman
Men you can put this guy in a chamber if you know what i meant to say

Even the jesus won't forgive you
Israel's actions were genocidal so you basically think Oct 7th attacks justify genocide.
It's okay, if Jesus doesn't forgive me, Buddha will.

The only reason anyone would say it is justified genocide is because they have no problem with it, as it is not their āpeopleā and/or their "religion".
I have so many choices.
praise Kali
LMFAO whos the first
Nobu
bros hindu
Nobu bro š
have you all seen
Evil Sanna is dangerous, bro's even ignoring the verses she's sendingš
I've confirmed with sources which I can't state, that he's actually Christian bro
I saw it bro šššš
hahaahahahaha
BRO my feed is full of them
They use AI the same amount that Hussain does, and don't even get paid for it
šššš
I wonder if the young people of Gaza have ever chanted similar slogans: What joy is there in life, what sorrow in death? Joy and sorrow, all return to dust.
if I see a top comment with absurd and unhinged takes I reply with "Sounds like another one of those Indian bots" š«¢
LOL
But when I do this I get called racist
<@&1373007728590458890> bro have you heard this banger growing up
GET OUT
Nah bro who deleted that comment ššš @high raven
Be excellent in what is good š„ŗ
Be innocent š of evil š
I didn't take a screenshot it was too good
wait which bro
Which one
Best feature since Elon bought Twitter
ššš
LOLL
most sane serious chat user
thoughts @glossy ether
That comment was like tear free shampoo, compared to what the other guy was saying
bro its so retarded
you have not seen the shit ive heard from that vc
ahahahahahahahaha
Olivander you had a majestic ahh pfp in April of 2025 why did you change it?
its so fucking stupid
All they talk about is Islam broš
holy shit are you in love with him
literally bro
So the screenshots and allegations don't match
theyre more devoted to islam than the muslim mods
No.
Like this pfp is cool ngl
Bro sent a virus
bro look at ts
Nuh
šššš
JOEYYYYY MY GOAT
Could you get Ed Sheeran to make a song bout it bro
THE GOAT
the goat
ong i will
You should give me image perms So I can send more peak.
"People ask me what God has done for me? Look at all this money"
āno xpā its so overššš
@magic olive free this guy
How did YOU get noxp roleš
Ngl deserved
He ain't giving me the image perms for the 5th time.

lemme see what u did
LMFAO
I think It would be better if you just don't give me image perms rather than checking what I did.
What'd he do
Expectedš
what did I do though? I forgot, and it's in the past, Forget and forgive (said this line for the 4th time)
I think...it's supposed to be "forgive,never forget" š
ur decision bro
Aight bro
Why don't you make me a mod?

I'll establish peace all over the server.
Iāve read plenty of jokes today, iām done for 




