#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 729 of 1
No, I'm just curious about the opinion
I still think it's not enough because it finally doesn't include any actual reparations for all the land that got stolen
But it's one of the better plans that have been made in the last decade, and it's a lot more public than ever before
Bro you keep posting the same shit could you please stop
You see it now😭😭😭😭
Yeah I don’t even think it’s neutral. Under international law the bare minimum is that Israel completely leaves Gaza and the West Bank immediately. There’s an argument to be made about more. It’s just that the bar is so low that a golden turd looks appealing for many 😭
I always see it but I thought he wouldn't care about my objection. I wish he does now.
Alhamdulilah,how are your prayers going
do you think gabriel was satan?
Right
i.e. some form of payment etc. for the land the israelis stole over the years
But how can people who haven’t read the Bible know that it already warned us about such situations? These are exactly the people who are most vulnerable to falling into the trap of a false gospel or a deceptive messenger.
i did not pray today and for the next week too
Be more careful with the stuff you claim, please.
So the Satan is distinct from the jinn?
no
Perhaps if Christianity was merciful and didn't send gentiles to the hellfire for not believing in it, I could grant this credibility, but it doesn't so this is redundant
Yeah exactly, it "looks" neutral because of the way things have been said and done
And this seems surprising😭
womanhood
Satan is a title for Iblis.
Shayatan is a title for anyone or thing that aims to lead you astray
Gabriel is an angel. Waraqa claims it's the same angel. Ie Gabriel.. that's not what the spookie in the cave claims
"Le Gabriel" bro turned French
Nah we're gonna dive on in
Oui oui
Oh so the the iblis is Satan, therefore jinn is not the Satan?
why does my shirt smell like onions
Satan is an individual Jinn whom is immortal.
Even my fellow Shayateen engage with more good faith than him.
Also fym "the Iblis"
Satan did nothing wrong, he sided with the reptiles after all
One sec I gotta look it up
Its just Iblis
but i dont rlly cook 
Based as usual
Yes but I think lives are more important than land,the plan is decent it stopped the killing of the innocent Palestinians and will lead them to having a little bit of freedom, don't you agree
I mean the plan it does involve withdrawal from both
And recent attempts of Israel to proclaim further sovereignty in the west bank have been met with criticism from... these guys
What happened
Ahha so who is iblis?
Are you saying jinn is identical to iblis?
Like I said tomorrow isn't promised
I 100% agree. At the end of the day, that money/land is still a right that was denied to the Palestinian people forever.
Yeah… I view it as a PR move. Slow it down to try and recover Zionism’s image.
Bro has been on the whole day
God is fair, so I think He will give a just consequence to those who were good but did not believe or did not want to accept Him, even though they knew about Him. Perhaps the ‘punishment’ is not physical but a lasting longing for God—a sense of eternal separation.
cuz i am woman
"Khyaya
"
Walah I forgot sorry
I will compile all his other stats and get the final number too, he's on his 4th account
Iblis is an individual Jinn. The Jinn are an invisible race. Iblis is immortal and the first sinner as well as the greatest manipulator.
you are talking with a wall
bro you’re a dumbass
his brain cannot even comprehend what is 1+1
"The king will rest now" (Actual quote)
Fair
Define the term indivisible jinn
5 hours VC everyday, I can beat these numbers while gaming.
IT SAYS INVISIBLE YOU INCOHERENT PISSANT
What you think is irrelevant, whats im the doctrine is whats important. I also refer to those who never know him
I KEEP TELLING HIM TO LEARN TO READ😭
The world is ran by evil people did you expect the deal to be fair all that matters now is the killings and suffering stops
I'm seeing how much reasonable doubt this guy can sow before conceding he can't read in the english server
isn’t he a high school drop out, not to judge but like that make sense
Yes. Agreed. I think if the peace plan goes well, and they get a better status in the Israeli territories to work/live, that'll also be helpful.
Address the point made and stop pretending to be dumb or ill assume you concede the argument gabriel was a demon.

Half the immigrants here who didn't grow up being taught English know it better than him
"Define indivisible jinn"
Same as
"What is 1 + 1"
anyhow some good news is the the first batch of gaza students graduated today since the israel bombing
aren’t you christian dawg? numbers 31:17-18😂😂😂
@slender coral 😂 😭
Define the term that you are using.. called "individual jinn"
Do you mean other jinns are not individuals?
He's just trolling yall rn
I didn't even think he was capable
Satan is a Jinn, like I am a Human. Not complicated
Or he's drunk
@plain ruin the question is will this deal go according to plan or, we all know Israel
What's wrong with that ? 🤔
Ibn Taymiyyah:
And Al-raḍaʻa is when the mouth is placed on the breast, and he drinks from it and then releases it. This is called Al-raḍaʻa. [43]
https://shamela.ws/book/7289/16260
Furthermore, raḍāʻ when applied to a man means performing oral sex on him. I wonder if that can be done through a cup.
This is the opinion of Shaykh al-Abani: “Do you want to say if he is nursed directly from the breast or by a cup? I say we don’t have any thing that I know of telling us the way that the wife of Abu Hudhaifa breast-fed Salim; we don’t know the way. And I personally say I don’t see any objection to his being nursed directly from the nipple .”
The video where he clearly says the above [for anyone who can understand Arabic]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDghBsWr2l0&ab_channel=ner333
ص57 - كتاب مجموع الفتاوى - سئل عن الصبي إذا رضع من غير أبيه وكذلك الصبية إذا رضعت ماذا يحرم عليه نكاحه بعد ذلك - المكتبة الشاملة
العلامة الشيخ الناصبي المعروف والكبير لدى اتباع الشاب الامرد :
وهو العلامة الشيخ محمد ناصر الدين الألباني أحد أبرز العلماء المسلمين في العصر الحديث، ويعتبر الشيخ الألباني
من علماء الحديث ا...
wallah i admire palestinians so much
I think that the matter that God in the Bible is described as a justice, is enough evidence that his courts will fair as well
Him being drunk is factual
even bombing n stuff they push thru hardships wow
No, high school starts at grade 9. Jr high drop out
I think because there's so much global pressure, it just may
it was from a cup, keep coping 😂😂😂
So the satanism is the essential property of a jinn just like humanity of a man?
@keen hareu should see this I guess.
Show me one sahih chain
numbers 31:17 “just” btw 😂
Unfortunately the Bible and doctrine contradict that idea
bro 
By the way @slender coral
In just one year he turned around and became exactly what he used to talk about 😂
No. Satan is the title of the Accuser which is held exclusively by Iblis, whom is an immortal Jinn
What Jewlius Caesar is doin here
What about it?
yes, yk they make me push thru some non issue on my own like procrastinating n stuff i realize i have the privilege to have a choice that they don’t
whats the low tier arg thats been brought
Probably drinks a lot because of the abuse he claimed to face in Korea.
Jesus just ordering the forced marriage and 🍇 of young girls for the armies, is all. Very just
Let's hope🤞🏿
😭😭😭💀
I don't find it funny tbh
Kafirs arguing about Islam
lemme refute their arguments
But you are predicating satanism to the subject called jinn just like the humanity predicated to the subject ie a man.
Which ? And in what way ?
bring them forward
who u think u is
In principle, yes, I don't either
I'm just been laughing too hard from how dumb this guy's getting by the day😭 I can't help it
Where is marriage there?
i’m joking 😭
?
hey lil bro, do u affirm god making truth claims about himself yes or no?
God making truth claims, such as?
I'd like to have a discussion about it. caesar doesn't seem to argue in good faith.
@shell hemlock beee
can the son say"i am the son"
this is not a good channel to joke in😭😭
What's wrong with that
yes or no
Again, what's wrong with that khyahh if he makes those claims
i asked, yes or no.
Do you know a good channel? Let's join it.
dont elaborate js yet lil bro
i don’t know i always chat here cuz there’s some action instead of general chat it’s always boring
Son claiming to be the son , yes
Nobody mentioned satanism. You are schizophrenic. Satan is an individual who is also named Ibliss. He comes from the race of the Jinn.
The Messiah is an individual who is also called Jesus. He comes from the race of Humans.
The Holy Spirit is an individual who is also called Gabriel. He comes from the race of Angels.
Interesting, what do you like?
You just said the same way as the man is called the man.
So, are the other jinns are not individually jinns?
I swear Muslim folk just love toxicity 😭 @plain ruin
If the Father is a different person with his own mind, in principle he could say “I am the Son.”
Christian belief says the Father cannot say “I am the Son,” because he is not the Son.
Since the Father cannot say “I am the Son,”(due to christians negating them being the same) but the Son does, their statements are different.
That suggests there are two different “I”centres (two different conscious persons) in what is supposed to be one God.
Ergo, it falls into Social trintarianism broski which is essentialy polytheism since it's multiple divine conscious beings lil bro
Are you dumb on purpose, yes or no
read it like a good boy
Do you think Ed Gein was an artist and innovative?
daddys waiting
Hey I'm here @rapid lark 
You accpeted premise 1 and if u reject the premise of the father and son being distinct ur a heretic
umm idk that’s kinda a general question
@shawn we forgot UAE the Arabian Israel,have you seen the atrocities in Sudan
ueah
All of them, muslim or not
They're chasing the dopamine/norepinephrine high from arguments tbh
he’s really skilled
Okay
Oo come to vc buddy 🫴🏻
Which one?
Yes
This should start to be addressed next.
True right? Besides his gruesome acts he was talented
6.2
Social Trinitarinism just means how the Trinity acts.
And that doesn't follow, if the son is not the father.. he wouldn't say he is the father.
How they are two divine multiple beings?
Circular reasoning "quran is false because galatians says blah blah"
he could easily work under some like luxurious or famous brands that deals with leatherwork and make a masterpiece
@turbid ivy answer or you concede the argument and this question by default is yes
Are you?
Are you dumb?
Ah so you concede you're dumb smh
No sir. I don't believe so
Abu lulu,his people and the UAE shall pay for what they have done,the things they do is so horrific
To debate him or
So you do think that book that appeared after the Bible had been written is the truth? Especially when Quran has been revealed by an angel preaching false gospel, before which the bible has warned us
Can you substantiate thst non-Christians will go anywhere except hell if they do not accept the trinity, unless were assuming salvation through faith in Jesus alone
Do you take the New Testamemt as divine revelation
I'm fully aware
I think we should focus on one at a time
Other conflicts are brought up by other groups to distract from giving fair treatment (towards the Palestinians) in my opinion
they don't fully share the same properties which negates them being TRULY the same.
The Son is not the Father, and the Father is not the Son ergo, they are distinct identities and if both a fully God each then it is multiple divine beings.
b-b-but how is it multiple beings!
distinct identities + full divinity = multiple divine beings in a logical sense.
So you concede you are dumb?
Oh so a book appearing after the scrolls of abraham is false?
he is actually really stupid
@plain ruin people get progressively smarter and this guy get progressively dumber
What about Islam, isn't the same with Quran?
debating religion in an english server wow
Numbers 31 17-18
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Loving Jesus
Paragraph 1. False, they share the same essence
Lines up with what alcohol does to the brain over long use
Properly, the Old Testament has mentioned Jesus, so the New Testament isn't false
who ?
Does the son know the hour? No, does the father? Yes, ergo different properties in knowledge.
they differ
Focus on one? Did you see what they do to women,kids and men who are unarmed and tbh this isn't a distraction war,the UAE is benefiting from this,by focusing on one we leave the other to be slaughtered in silence
Forget that, none of the Christians are pointing out them saying that "Jesus" is being mentioned alongside an Old Testament book
The Old testament doesn't even remotely mention the plurality of a god person concept
the jesus in the bible not rlly the same as the one in islam
No real Christians online just Catholics 💔💔💔
I mean on an international level
The Trump plan only stopped all the bullshit "The US will takeover" because of protests
The protests should be redirected
We deny an All-Loving God as well as a divine Jesus so it is a circumstantial use of evidence to show hypocrisy
Where is @analog hound And @high raven
Catholics? Here?😭
Okay, I didn't understand your question at first, I guess.Now it's my answer: Isn't it weird for you, that An angel from heaven just appeared to Muhammad, just like the Bible has warned us?
It's just Protestants/Evangelists
Even worse 😭😭😭
Circular reasoning, bible upholds corruption/contradictions what need do I have in following that.
Ikr
catholics or orthodox for u guys
Paragraph 2.. yes, there is nothing wrong with that because the father is the distinct relation than the son..however they share the same essence. However it's the subsisting person expressing his personal relation, therefore the father can't say I'm the son.
Two different hypostasis doesn't negate sharing the same mind
i like catholics and orthodox christians
I don't like Catholics
So you like the actual christians
They're cowards imo
girl why
Name one Catholic
LOL
They continuously change their teachings to fit Western ideology
My entire moms side of the family
Never met one alhamdlah
Just like me and Jews
Protestantism was literally changing teachings too
I don't understand how you don't like each other it's literally the same religion just with different rules.....doesn't that mean you don't respect what your God originally said?
What protests? And what is your solution to leave sudanese people to be massacred in silence while we just turn a blind eye.
If two entities have different relational properties, they arent identical gang, meaning 2 separate identities which both share the fully divine nature it implies multiple beings.
Son have the tw minds.
Divine and human. Predicating the divine of the son result in the same mind as the father. However, if we Predicate the human mind of the son.. , he would not know the hour.
Therefore, the son have two minds, divine mind and human mind. According to the human nature son's human nature is really distinct from his divine nature. No problem at all.
well hmm the catholic church i went to were rlly conservative i got shamed once by a mom and i never went back there
It shouldn't imo
same i’ve never met a jew both irl and online
But there are definitely a lot of prophecies from old Testament that were fulfilled in Jesus Christ
Christianity is not accepting of homosexuality idk why these guys try to make it liturgically okay
but i heard jews don’t even use internet
I don't think you're getting my point
I think if we directly start protesting worldwide about Sudan, the Palestinian plan will fall apart quickly
Chat gpt merchant
That's the Amish, not "Jews"
It was founded as a change in teachings
By forcing them with falsified stories in the gospels
They would be within a category of Jews, but they're not Jews as a whole
apparently some jews actually don’t use technology
Same with literally every religion
during some time of the year
not really in islam and christianity
i think anyway
The Amish are Christians
Nah there are some in both
Are they? I thought they were Jewish
Or I'm confusing them with a similar Jewish group
really in islam muslims don’t use technologies ??? 
I think so
There’s sects
never heard abt this
These are not two entities.
Relations don't have to be identical to eachother. Relations are always two fold. Real distinction doesn't imply two beings.
By that def, islam has 99 Gods
Whom?
gotta ask chatgpt
Verify it
Checks out, they're Christian
The anonymous gospel authors, excluding John
Just look up what a sect is
There are some people who attempt to use scripture from the muslim world to refuse technology
Same with Christians and Jews
Yeah I thought so. My grandmother was a bit crazy and once brought my dad to an Amish adjacent church that spoke in tongues
"La la la la sha ma ba la da la la la la"
how do people live without technologies fr
I don't understand why will the Palestinian plan fail just because people noticed the atrocities that is happening in Sudan and decided to speak about it
My mum took me to one of those
Oh no
Nowhere does it mention human nature that's cope but even then we can regard to "Does the father know he himself is the son, and the son know he himself is the father. "
sorry i took abit i went to pray fajr
i lowkey like the amish
It's not that it will fail, it's that because less people are watching, they'll let Israel slide under the radar
Which can and probably will cascade towards failure of the plan
apparently they can build houses n stuff within a day
That was just to get you here,why are you not talking about Christianity tomorrow ain't promised dude
There is nothing called Palestine
Your lack of intelligence makes sense now, I apologies for bullying special needs people
That wouldn't happen just because we talk about Sudan we won't forget the others in the same situation plus I still don't get your idea on what we are suppose to do with Sudan
All this because just 10 Nepali students died
Bro is doing so much😭😭😭😭😭
American conservatives would want that to happen
No one's saying we should exclude them from the conversation
We need to make sure that we keep our radar on all the conflicts and address them all
Without letting any of them get undermined
Do you have the video of the nepali woman
Which one😭
Nowhere mentions the tawhid in the Quran by that def. Therefore tawhid is a cope.
Fallacy will not work on me.
The father is not the son, therefore he knows he is not the son. One essence subsisting in three Relations. Since it's the persons expresses the relations, therefore, the persons expresses their distinct relations, since the relations are distinct from eachother in reality.
The Christian one who went to Israel to express her support
Allahs attributes dont create separate identities tho, theyre merely aspects OF the one being.
The attributes dont even merely imply individual entities.
YES😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Smartest thing you've said 🙏🏻
Hello, I am outside, can't talk, shout out to Sanna
Enjoy bro 😭
"B-b-b-but Muhammad and wife beatings"
Bro gave a shoutout😭😭😭
Theyll be admitted to the hellfire
I often go to the department, I love it, I relax there.
What did I do💀💀💀
This like Sudan is undermined so much, people didn't even know there was a genocide going on until the Abu lulu video and I agree we should keep our radar up on all the conflict going on
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Yeah, that's the thing
American Christians are using the Sudan conflict "Why aren't you..." to move eyes from the Palestinian one right now
We need to make sure that everyone gets justice, all countries/religions/etc.
the F-22 on the sky is justice
They are not mere aspects.. they are really distinct from his essence according to salafi/athari position. There wouldn't be one identity.
Essence would be one thing
Certain attributes being diff diff thing.
That's called the multiple of identities or compund identity.
🇺🇸 🇮🇱 is justice
who wins the war who is the justice
loser have no ground to speak
Root word for tawhid (wahid) is mentioned in 2:163 of al kahf buddy
uhh Distinct relational properties -> distinct identity lolski
one essence plus multiple identities is a contradictory way of putting it
The "person expresses their relations" doesn’t resolve the contradictions rather it just restates the theological claim ur making
I saw this but are they dumb like we can keep up and focus on both wars,if that is their plan to divide and take eyes of Palestine it is not working
@feral river China is a good country, but it would be better if it didn't oppress Turks.
It is being done in order to troll and distract us
And this tactic has constantly been used
I'm saying we should be careful and focus on completing what we started, not that we shouldn't start with Sudan
we do not recognize there are turks in our country
there's only Uyghur Chinese instead
And we don’t have to give a fuck about them
That's not a given. Who said they lost, even if it meant the death of the last person .
I don't agree with you on this point, they are and even Palestinian Christians
The hypostases are distinct persons expressing relations -> apparent multiplicity
His attributes are not separate hypostases, they only inhere in essence whereas, each person is a subsisting relational person in your theology.
We are doing that whilst also raising voice for Sudan
You Chinese are oppressing the Uyghurs.
theres isnt a separate hypostases for the attributes lol
Not really we didn’t oppress them
We just enforce laws and that’s it
@plain ruin
Tawhid is not wahid. .define tawhid
Yes as I said the persons are really distinct from eachother, but not distinct from the essence. Therefore, the identity of God is absolute since there are no real distinction between attributes and essence.
There is one numerical identity of the essence not many, as I clarified above. That problem appears in islam due to real distinction between essence and attributes
... there is no contradiction so far..
What is p and not p?
So why are they suffering?
I just answered this Objection
they are sudanese right ?
@turbid dome is this Ai
Idk busy
For no reason
And they are not suffering
Only terrorists and separatists is suffering as expected
@feral river Do you consider yourself superior to them?
Ohh sorry for ping yah
We never target most people
Who are those
Yes but they have their own identities since they are really distinct from the essence.
Essence would be the one thing
Attributes would be the other thing and so forth with 99 attributes
Your numerical oneness collapse here.
No
Just copy pasting/memorization of David Wood arguments
@feral river they were nice people
Yes,the things they are doing are disgusting have you seen the one of Abu Lulu and all the satellite images in Sudan
Yeah I'm aware
I just know that people just forgot what happened in 2017-2019 in Palestinian territories
Sudanese people
@crystal kayak Why did Palestine help Armenia in the 2020 Azerbaijan-Armenia wars, my friend?
Yeah I know
apparently women there they get sa-ed and tortured, children just murdered and thrown away like trash
But under the law everyone is equal
Nobody is allowed to make a separation against our state
Let's end this conversation, my friend.
@crystal kayak ?
There’s no Palestine but State of Israel
🇮🇱
No after sa the excute them by hanging or a bullet to the head,the kids and men are first torched and killed by either a bullet or from beatings
they are living like our country during pol pot
@crystal kayak Answer me, friend.
Gn
If you have any objections, put it on my dm.
I'll review them tomorrow
@shell hemlock you can literally see bodies piled up on top of each other from satellite
Palestine good I guess
What
@tacit thistle
@crystal kayak Why did Palestine help Armenia in the 2020 Azerbaijan-Armenia wars, my friend?
It's the root word
Identity of God being absolute contradicts premise 1 as Father ≠ Son
Two entities cannot be distinct and identical at the same time when applying Classical Logic,
The attributes are inseparable from the essence dawg
the contradiction for distinct relational properties become distinct identity is
If two entities differ in any property, they are distinct entities. We know it's separate entities as multiple identities each fully divine equates to multiple entities. Each person is a subsisting "who" is who is distinct even while sharing one essence still counts as multiple entities in Classical Logic.
Can you cite this
I don't know but they also supported turkey in the displacing of Kurdish people but still nobody deserves such brutality
Your politicians said that Armenia was right.
Cite it

You mean Turkish Kurds ?
or they simply deport illegal immigrnats
I'm not going to stand here and prove it to you, go investigate and you'll find it.
Mate it inheres in the essence, it does not constitute a new subsisting entity.
Attributes = inseparable properties of that essence
Therefore it is one God, not multiple entities
single essence - numerical oneness preserved.
distinct entities - not preserved.
the subsisting entity?
for christians: each person is a "who"
for muslims: the attributes ARE inseparable from the essence itself.
China ain't winning any war
That's the problem, I'm trying that and can't find any proof of your statement.
What so you lied or
You're the one with the information, should be easy for you to show it
As a citizen of a Muslim country, I support Israel because it helped us in the 2020 war.
Still no citation
Hmm
@thorny steeple dude if it true just show the proof and we move on
@high crater bunlara kafa yetmiyor knk
Idk bro sounds like you are making stuff up lol
Omg I'm trying to post screenshots for this but they don't get posted 😭
Dude, where can I find the 2020 videos?
Can you dm? I'm not finding anything with my search
Hayır knk yeminle
They have good relations. Idk if the extent as the guy claims though.
You are conflicting with the identity of the relations and with the identity of the essence that is numerically one. I have already clarified in above messages.
These are not two entities.
Is the clay identical with statute of the clay? According to your classical logic 🤔 the answer would be yes, but they are not considered as identical because the clay is not the statute.
... distinct relations are identical to the essence in reality. However, the relations are distinct from eachother, therefore, three identities on relations.. not in essence, but the essence is numerically absolutely one.
The son and the father shares the some properties called God which is absolutely one. Therefore, there is no three entities. The relations are in reality identical to the essence.
There something called a search bar where you can easily search for it
I love it when people use the argument. I am “x” thus my argument is valid.
I am Muslim and I support Israel. 😭😭😭
If a Palestinian leader said what you're claiming, it would be in text too
What he's saying is true but doesn't make Palestine in the wrong here lol as if either Armenia or Azerbaijan were in the right
I'm seeing that both Israel and Palestine have shown more support for Azerbaijan in my search
This is like the oldest fallacy on planet earth
@thorny steeple I guess geopolitics isn't as simple as you wanna think.
If anything Armenia is more in the right, they are the majority of Artsakh, and Azerbaijan attacked first
And Azerbaijan is occupying it now
Anyway, I said my mind, Israel is on our side, we are on their side.
How about Azrabjani nationalists?
They're basically the same as Turkish nationalists, I don't know why these countries aren't one when they speak the same language and agree on pretty much everything. Maybe because there are countries in between and Azerbaijan is Shia?
Azerbaijan did not do it, they committed genocide against us in 1992 and in 2020 we tortured them and expelled them from their lands😂😂
They have good relations it seems
Lmao that's fun, repaying violence with more violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagorno-Karabakh_conflict
The citations for Palestine throughout the page don't show anything in 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Nagorno-Karabakh_War
This is the 2020 incident and Palestine isn't even mentioned
The message finally arrived lmfao
They have both relations with both sides
It's pretty much tribal thinking
Middle East needs to be leveled with nukes tbh
@thorny steeple
bro what
East and North Caucasus too but it's too mountainous, requires too many nukes
I fucking said this before.
I agree
The Caucasus is still stuck in idiotic 90s Balkan politics
Let's start with Oman
Too peaceful there
Ong. Oppressed are relieved from oppression. Oppressors get what they deserve. I think it’s a win win
whut
And the problem is solved
i’m so confused i just opened the chat
Nothing
At least Israel and Palestine are fighting over ongoing clashes
Let god if he exists do the judging lmfaooooo
Caucasus just ignites new conflicts for no fucking reason
He doesn't have proof, probably got some AI generated videos
what what huh
Aze
Yeah
Or we could do it now and nuke the region.
i
KOSOVO IS SERBIA RAAAAAAAAA
See that’s the thing. We nuke them to send them there
i think it’s time for bed
Shiiiiiii
Gn
Abdul confirming the stereotypes. 😭
“Why nobody likes us”
Ong
Who’s us
one person doesn’t make a whole
LMAO YOUR PFP
A lot of people said this here, idk if as a joke or not
Found it on Pinterest
I think it's ridiculous when they can't even live normally without AI
I saw many Muslims taking that seriously.
Skyrim belongs to the dov
This is still the best pfp ever
🥵🥵🥵🥵
You missed the Ratchet & Clank pfp
Relations are really distinct -> each has a property the others do not
Relations are identical to essence -> one entity, one numerical identity.
You're admitting the relations differ in property but you also claim they are numerically identical with the essence??? They cannot be both really distinct and numerically identical at the same time gang
clay = substance, statue = form but in your case, the relations are said to be “really distinct”, not just “different forms” so real DISTINCTIONS in classical logic imply the distinct identities premise unlike a form of clay
three relational identities but a singular essense is a hybrid category bc theyre distinct in property but not substance which classical logic upholds distinct properties as implying distinct entities
relational property differs
the essence is identical
its logically conflicting when you see a singular entity cannot be both identical AND distinct in any property for that matter
omg that is a lot to read
Do you still have it and why are your pfps all based on games
Islam calls for Muslims to preach their religion and share it with others
So yeahhhhhh. Whether people do it or not that’s their religion lmfao
Cant deny facts
They are the most entertaining to edit
There will be a comeback of that pfp soon
How long did the current masterpiece take to make
As soon as I exhaust my Skyrim modding era
4 minutes
Maybe less because I made two versions
A saurophobic one and this reptile-approved one
Saurophobic I thought you liked dinosaurs
Is that you
You should rest more at your age
yes
I like dinosaurs, the first version is more accurate but it's saurophobic
how i feel choosing water instead of soda
Because the protagonist of the game kills dragons
So I used the helmet of the dragon servants
choosing water instead of soda makes me feel like a real adult alpha
how i feel not eating ice cream after my meals
how u kno im a teenager tho
anyway it’s 2am twin imma hit the sack
hehe hit the sack
Hit the hay also good night
why u want me to assault hay twin
If you hit the sack you must also hit the hay and make it equal
😭😭😭😭😭
Zwhrw
Hello, what would you like to order?
Im vegan and carnivorous
Make whatever you want
So i’ve just learned the UAE is funding this shit in Sudan
Finally people are catching up
If only I possesed a nuclear bomb
Well maintaining that nuke would be difficult 🤓
Maintain I am launching it as soon as it arrives
Funded by the united Arabs Emirates
Guys hypothetically question time
God is real
He goes down and tells you. You can k1ll yourself but with it kill an entire nation. Do you take the offer. If you do which nation are you erasing
No
So i won't be there to enjoy their down fall no thank you
So you would rather the world be worse off because you can’t experience it?
Assuming that you are able to off a nation that you consider bad according to your moral compass
Look into it they fund a lot of different groups in Africa
It’s a pretty straightforward question lol
Do you know Africa politics?
Yea I understood it but like what
Idk chat was dead
It’s a spicy question too lol
I wouldn't take the offer
I’m African so I know something about it
Why
What’s happening in Nigeria
I wanna live???
So you value your life over a bunch of bad people?
Hypothetically yes,I dreamed of it and I want to see it
Yes
Sheeeesh
Apparently the leader there wants to tax Nigerians who live outside the country while most Nigerians don’t live with stable power
I didn’t expect these answers from you guys
I don’t think genocide solves problems
Bcs it's not that straightforward
So no
Ofc it doesn’t
So what’s the point?
1 is better than 0
It is sacrifice yourself to better humanity
Killing a bad person is better than having them alive. Doesn’t solve the problem. But still good
Yeah
But it’s a whole country of people lol
Because one government does mass genocide it doesn't mean whole county's population agrees w it
Lmao
Casualties. Oopsie daisy
I wanna spare the people who are against it
What about deaths
You want me to get banned
We know you’re thinking Russia
They've nothing to do it
👀
Okay let’s say you get that too
Wdym
Do you take it now
Like add that to the offer. You can save the good ones
I was thinking of a whole continent
Bro where are the downsides then
Government is kind of the representation of the nation if the government has a bad rep the whole country does too
I still wouldn't. Just because I wanna live and it doesn't indicate I think I'm better than them
What's the flaw in the offer
I'm really confused
Of course there are always exceptions
Idk. I wasn’t expecting people to be this selfish ( not in a bad way)
Idk
Death
Ofc but there always people who disagrees w the government
A little price to pay
Facu
Exactly
A small price to pay for salvation
Anyway there is only one answer
Entirety of avengers were wrong
Come on….. don’t be shy…… say what is on your mind…….
He wiped out half of the universes people didn’t he
Yeah
Let’s hope most of them were bad people lol
It's R... I mean I would pick a country no one cares about and see how long it takes until they notice
A country like Micronesia or Tuvalu
Maybe spiderman disappearing was sad though
Isn’t there like a country with only cattle population or sth
I’ve heard this somewhere
I don't know but in Denmark they have more pigs than people
@Abd...
Are you Ukrainian perchance?
If I took the offer Swedes wouldn't notice the difference
Let the Russia slander loose Isfrun you know you want to
@winter echo you still alive
No
Why the Russia hate then
Why are you fighting over here
I don’t mean like oh only Ukrainians get to hate them lmfao
There are many countries with R as first letter
But yeah. You get what I mean I guess lol
Bored
Need some action
I met many people of different nationalities who hate it, some of them don't even border Russia
Btw I wasn't necessarily implying Russia
Yeah sure. But I’m asking about that lollllllllll
It was Rwanda we all know
Why do you dislike them
They mistreated Crimean Tatars for holding flags
It was actually the Romanis
Do you know about Romanistan/Tsiganistan
Is that it?
One of the many reasons but I'm thinking about them right now
Idk but Olly has awoken me to the fact that I share an ethnic origin with them
So I must join forces with you in hating
The only thing I know about them is that everybody except Americans hate them
Hmmmmmm
I never met one tho
Since the topic is about erasing people who agree Kim jong UN should rain nukes over Europe
They're originally Indian, their language is even derived from Hindi
Yes I know, from Rajasthan
Were they nomadic dalits? Or exiled
Idr what I read, when they left, etc.
They were settled by Vlad Tepes III after they helped fight off the Ottomans
They might just be descendants of that one Indian dude who rode to Sweden on his bicycle, so let's blame @fresh flower /j
They arrived to Europe around that time
What the fuck
Hm that's even earlier
2 millenia off
They probably kept the language more alive than most north indians did, then
A lot of them kept the language to the point they didn't know where it came from
😭
They didn't even have any other language to compare it to until someone heard it side by side with a similar language if I'm not mistaken
Hold on lemme hear one of em speak
Why did the video start with an american 12 year old saying "Hey guys here's a video on Gypsy Language"
I'm listening to it right now, and it sounds like Hindi with an accent😭
I don't even know hindi but I know the words are from hindi
Conversation and youtube for me
Wikipedia night sessions
Their religion is also a semi-polytheistic version of Christianity
WHAT
Yes, at least the most traditional ones believe in different aspects of divinity, some of them akin to minor deities or spirits
Romani folklore encompasses the folktales, myths, oral traditions, and legends of the Romani people. The Romani were nomadic when they departed India during the Middle Ages. They migrated widely, particularly to Europe, while other groups stayed and became sedentary. Some legends (often from non-Romani peoples) say that certain Romani have pass...
Read the motifs section, there are different deities
"Shalom Alaikum my brother in Christ, I hope you are following the eightfold path alongside Hanuman and Ram today"
I don't know how they survived through living in Europe as pretty much pagans
Probably because they settled mostly in Eastern Europe where there was more tolerance for different religions
They're like anti-#🧠|serious-chat in all forms
How personal
Was this like your major too in uni?
And if you don’t mind what research do you do?
The past simple, simple past, or past indefinite, in English equivalent to the preterite, is the basic form of the past tense in Modern English. It is used principally to describe events in the past, although it also has some other uses. Regular English verbs form the past simple in -ed; however, there are a few hundred irregular verbs with diff...
Yes it's evolutionary biology
You just got me curios lol. Sorry if it’s too much personal questions. You can call it off whenever you want
Right now it's stag beetles and other arboreal beetles of Japan and Korea
Fill in the blanks:
_ _ _ metrics
Do you like document stuff about them or…… like how does that field go
Or research
It's a lot of stuff but in short we calculate and document the evolutionary trends of a species or multiple according the the environment
Think Isfrun's field
Yes
Then the government ID relation will kick in
What’s your h-index
Bro's selling her data

What do you do
And you
I've shared enough here😭
@dapper laurel how's magna graecia been
They are recent publications (first one in 2024) so it's decent at the moment
For what, all my crimes are impossible to track at this point
Idk anything about you😭😭😭
Wait a sec……. Crimes???????? Huhhhhh
There are
Even if you knew my name and surname you wouldn't be able to prove I did those crimes. I would fail to prove it as well
I removed all tracks
WHAT CRIMES 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
I'll give you a rundown, 22, ethnically Indian, Portuguese citizen, grew up in Kuwait
Put me in on the life girl😭😭😭😭
All you need to know
Do them years earlier and remove all linked accounts
I think it would count as scamming
These are the stuff that idc about😭😭😭😭😭. I want to know what you study/ work in
Story time????????
Bros a farmer
I probably stole 300-400~€ worth of PlayStation Network content
Wait....
But:
- I need to get extradited
- There is no way to prove I did it anymore
I had no idea that you had Romanian heritage
Mehhhhhhh. Not that serious imo
LMFAOOOOOO. GYPSYYYYY ALERTTTTT
Graduated BSc IT, Cybersecurity
Working towards an MBA with an IT focus, doing Cybersecurity/Networking certifications on the side
Sheeeesh. Good on you
Your turn
Hahahhahahhahaha
One of the first countries where I lived
I learned all the basic survival rules of Eastern Europe
I learned the market value of iron buried deep in rural soil
Just say Mossad
Lmfaooooooo
Who is a patriot
Susssy
Are you doing espionage?
My mom would want me to cut the grass
@magic olive
Thanks
@fresh flower
Were you having a conversation about religion?
No not me, they were arguing about it but there were no real Christians just those heathen denominations 😭
Ohhhhh
Sorry I couldn't talk 😂
Relations are really same as the essence in reality. Khyahh doesn't follow.
Relations are identical to the essence in reality. However, Relations are distinct from one another in reality since Relations are two fold. Being in something and being toward something.
Again, you didn't read what I said.. I said they are really distinct from eachother.. no real distinction with the essence, that would imply the essence is the 4th thing otherwise. So there is no contradiction here, because you are confused with is Predication and is of identity.
Is Clay abs identical with the statue that is made of?
Is the action same as Motion and so does the passion?
Hello

🦆
DUCK
Whats an unknown duck
If its unknown then how do you know its a duck and if you know its a duck then how is it unknown
You're getting too philosophical
What if I only know that it's duck and nothing else
It'd be unknown still
No you know that its duck hence it's a known duck not unknown
But you don't claim to know person if you only see them
But you know that its a person
Some attributes are known and some are not
Then is the person know or unknown
Or is known and unknown about a perticular specific attribute
And in this case is the attribute unknown or the value of attribute
And if there is a value then is it subjective value or objective value
@fallow shard

Maybe you're right
I know it!! god forbid a person make a comment
I just asked question
Fight fight fight
Yea idk the answer
Hmm
an entity cannot be both distinct in a property and numerically identical.
law of Identity states X = X; an entity cannot differ from itself in any property. The Father and Son differ.
regarding the clay, the relations are real distinctions, not just formal differences.
Relations being really distinct in property cannot be identical to the essence without violating Leibniz’s Law.
As for predication: we say this is a statue of clay -> conceptual distinction, khalas.
Whereas with identity: P1 - P2 ESSENCE -> the properties must match, with the trinity this fails.
The relations in your argument are real distinctions not inherently predicate.
the objects themselves are distinct gang
You are talking about relations that are really distinct in property.
Claiming they are numerically identical with the essence is like saying
“This wooden 7 = this metal 7 = this glass 7”
Logic says: different properties = not identical lol
confusing numerical identity with predication?
Are we talking about geometry here ?
it may apply abstractly with the number 7 not inherently with the objects,
The models themselves are physically distinct, so they are not numerically identical in reality.
THe relations are abs identical to the essence, therefore, there are not three distinct entities.
If i apply the classical identiy of Leibniz law,
The statue is identical to the clay.. since the statue is the same matter as the clay.
But this idenity statement is false, because the statue is not the clay. Anther example is:
Person 1 = God
Person 2 = God
Person 1 = Person 2
this is called the opaque context,” i.e., it denies the intersubstitutability of the terms for each other.
A common example is:
- Lois Lane knows she loves Superman.
- Superman is Clark Kent.
- So, Lois Lane knows she loves Clark Kent.
The inference in this example collapses because there exists an opaque context. Lois Lane does not know she loves Clark Kent. The same exact relationship obtains in virtue of the opacity of Trinitarian context in the case of the persons. Each person is God, and each person is not the other persons. Because of the identity with regard to the divine essence, they aren't composed with it.
Thefore, im gonna use the RI
concrete because it deals with actual entities that entail real properties
- The word of Allah {is} Uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
- Jesus {is} the word of Allah (Sahih Muslim 195)
C. Therefore, Jesus is uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
The word is the intellect of God, therefore, it's the essential to God.
If two entities are numerically identical, they must share all real properties.
alright so F, S, AND H are each numerically identical to the divine essence: F=S=H=E
F begets S
S is begotten by F
H proceeds from F and/or S:
If F = S = H = E, then all properties of F must be shared by S and H.
Relational properties differ since F begets S (not true of S), S is begotten (not true of F), H proceeds from F (not true of F or S).
thw trinity still comes under logically incoherent: either you preserve numerical identity by denying real relational distinctions or preserve the distinctions by denying numerical identity
Superman analogy blah blah is a Conceptual Distinction which differs from the real relational distinction.
The relational properties aka begetting, begotten etc are ontologically real properties of said persons in the triune god spectrum.
In the Superman case, there is no violation of leibniz law as superman share all real properties the difference is knowledge context only.
The trinity differs wit real properties so numerical identity fails, if we included relational properties.
The properties also differ gang, applying the opaque context argument doesn't magically unify them
From Above,
Isa {is} uncreated
Allah {is} uncreated
IF two things are indentical to the third thing, they must be identical to each other. Therefore, from Transitivity,
Isa = Allah
Define real properties
Superman analogy blah blah is a Conceptual Distinction which differs from the real relational distinction.
Yes, i gave an analogy of man, but GOd there is no accidents..
Still, Abs idenity fails here, that's why you gotta appeal to the RI
the real relational properties?
ANd do they differ from the essence?
Superman analogy fails for god no? due to the properties being all essential, not accidental.
I know, that's an analgoy, still, the prblem is not solved under Abs idenity of relations, you have to appeal to RI
my answer would be yes?
the properties are instantiated in the essence
Nope, they dont differ from the essence>>
the properties are instantiated in the essence
they are not added extra things to the essence
- The word of Allah {is} Uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
- Jesus {is} the word of Allah (Sahih Muslim 195)
C. Therefore, Jesus is uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
From Above,
Isa {is} uncreated
Allah {is} uncreated
IF two things are indentical to the third thing, they must be identical to each other. Therefore, from Transitivity,
Isa = Allah
@tacit thistle
But according to Tawhid,
Isa is not identical to Allah, therefore Tawhid collapses
The Clark analogy only addresses intensional/epistemic substitution failures.
It does not apply to real property differences, which are essential to the trinitarian relational distinctions.
The apparent need for RI comes only if you insist that relational properties are ontologically independent of the essence, if you treat them as modes or dependent aspects of the single essence, leibniz law is satisfied without appealing to opaque contexts.
You know what word means right?
Isa alayhi salam is a creation of Allah VIA Allahs word.
Isa was a word from Allah that He bestowed on Maryam, meaning He created him with the word `Be' that He sent with Jibril to Maryam.
kalamah Allah just shows Allah created jesus via a command.
aka be and he was
The Clark analogy only addresses intensional/epistemic substitution failures.
there is a conceptual disctions, between Clark kent and superman. Therefore, Abs identity fails to address them as identical. Therefore, you have to appeal to RI
Either you have to say clay is abs identical to the statute,, which is wrong btw.
In order for you to apply RI, the properties have to formally and coneptually identical, otherwise you cant apply Abs identity. Therefore, Abs is ill mannered incomplete without RI.
The apparent need for RI comes only if you insist that relational properties are ontologically independent of the essence, if you treat them as modes or dependent aspects of the single essence, leibniz law is satisfied without appealing to opaque contexts
these are not mere modes, that's called modalism. The relations are really distinct from eachother, not mere modes. Therefore, RI is acceptable.
When you say Isa {is} the word of Allah.
Do you use 'is' as predication or 'is' as the identity relation?
That's his human nature, created in the QUran, because it also says in sahih muslim 195, Isa ..IS.. the Spirit of ALlah.
IN surah 66.12, isa was created through the Spirit of ALlah, if hte Spirit of ALlah is the Isa, it's the creation of his human nature merely., cause either way, he exists prior to the creation of his humanity either as the word or the Spirit of ALlah.
No mention of jibreel, so i will negate this.
who pinged me
abs identity applies to the entity itself, not to epistemic or conceptual descriptions.
Abs Identity does not fail here yk that? the failure is in knowledge context, not in the real identity of the entities
you have to appeal to RI
So your claim that “Abs Identity fails for Clark/Superman” literally confuses epistemic distinction with numerical identity.
Abs Identity is preserved if you carefully define “the same substance” vs. “the same object in form so RI isnt required.
Abs Identity remains logically coherent for the divine essence if relational properties are treated as instantiated in the essence yk?
Let's say this:
Father (F), Son (S), and HOly spirit (H) each instantiate real relational properties yes?
These relational properties are ontologically real but dependent/instantiated on the essence so they do not constitute separate substances
so Abs is suffice you dont HAVE to refer to RI, now back to my original claim.
If F = S = H = E numerically, then according to leibniz law
F and S must share all properties, S and H must share all properties etc.
Premise 1 (Trinity claim) is that F = S = H = E (numerical identity)
Premise 2 is the (Real relational distinctions): F isnt S in relational properties, S isnt h etc.
Premise 3 laibniz law numerically identical entities must share all real properties
contradiction is F, S, and H don't share all real properties.
That's False, Allah created jesus via his word
(Verily, the likeness of `Isa before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be! ـ and he was.)
This is why `Isa was a word and a Ruh (spirit) created by Allah
if two things are numerically identical, then for every property P, what’s true of one is true of the other.
You cannot say “it applies to essence itself"
That’s a category restriction that breaks the definition of numerical identity.
abs identity applies to the entity itself, not to epistemic or conceptual descriptions.
I know, like the matters.. but not in every cases,,
Abs Identity does not fail here yk that? the failure is in knowledge context, not in the real identity of the entities
It does fail, cause you say the clay is abs identical to the statue khyhhaa?
They are formally identical to the same being, not conceptualy.
Clark kent = Superman (as a person)
So, abs identy only apply here in a person.
It doesnt give us the clarification in what sense that there is abs idenitty. therefore, it's ill mannared or incomplete. Still needs RI to solve this.
Homosexuality and bisexuality are both normal. - People’s Daily (Chinese Communist Party) 04/15/2018
either the persons are not really distinct which isss Sabellianism i think
or the essence is not numerically identical in all three aka polytheism
all ur doing is appealing to a singular essence which just relocates it between the semantic use of “real” and the logical demands of identity.
do you deny relations?
thailand 🫢
Khyahha, but Jesus is the word of Allah according to sahih muslim 195,
I know that verse, but either way Isa still exists prior to the existence of his human nature,, either as the spirit of Allah, or either as the word of Allah.
khyhaa, the word of Allah is a creation?
What do you mean by "normal"
no way bro i went to sleep and woke up and his arse is still here @plain ruin
They're getting into using mathematical systems observed by humans as proof/denial of the trinity now
that is epistemic, not metaphysical. the difference between s/uperman and his alter ego lies only in modes of reference aka how we conceive the same man
metaphysically, they are numerically identical aka the same concrete human being
leibniz law isn’t about what losi knows, it’s about what is the case in reality
So the “failure” of Abs identity here is only a linguistic opavity problem not a metaphysical one.
This shows, RI is not needed but rather the failure is epistemic, not ontological yes?
jesus is created via Allahs command
word whatever u wanna call ot
Are we... treating entities as numbers...
bruh
how do u even have this much time on ur hand
i’m unemployed and i go out and eat and photosynthesis
that constitute separate hypostases yes
heh?
f=father
s=son
h=holy spirit
im lowk bored ngl
Sanna hasn't had any issues in her argument so far, the other two are just yapping for the sake of it
Lois Lane knows she loves Superman.
Superman is Clark Kent.
So, Lois Lane knows she loves Clark Kent.
opaque contexts problem, the Abs identity is unclear and incomplete withour RI. Im gonna still use RI. stop me if you can
That's my point
Why would you even try to apply MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS to BEINGS
Do you deny that Action being the motion and passion being the motion?
not separate beings per christians rather separate hypostases
you do know relative Identity is a category error it tries to fix a semantic opacity problem by rewriting the metaphysics of identity, abs is not a rule about knowledge contexts not inherently "incomplete"
Aristotelian metaphysics?
Actually, it's incomplete, it's foolishness to say She loves Clark Kent, when she she doesnt..
The RI solves this problem.
yes
uhh we affirm God’s actions (af'al) as real and volitional but we wouldnt frame them in terms of motion, passion, or Aristotelian causality yk?
but God is bound by... mathematical relations?
"7 to the power 7 to the power 7 words in my book🤬"
777 check the 777 digit of pie golden ratio trust me, no you used wrong generator 🤬
I would argue RI is not a category error.
It just complete the Abs identity, because Abs alone is unclear
it's incomplete
RI breaks the logic of identity and is worse than just acknowledging opacity.
RI tries to “solve” it by redefining identity relative to categories, but the problem is semantic, not metaphysical. Abs identity still holds for the actual individual.
lets say superman is clark kent, abs identity replies to the object itself not its belief, RI would be unnecessary because identity in reality is unaffected by the epistemic conetxt
also it destroys transitivity of identity by making it “category relative.” with leibniz' law.
we yapping atp
"B-b-but computers don't use cheats to do division they totally don't use approximations and manipulations"
ur gonna affirm RI but ill yap and show args for otherwise
It's Sunday
it wont get anywhere lowk
It's called the analogy of the relations.
Do you affirm Action as motion, so does the passion?
Now, RI also solves the problem
“Allah acts and His action produces real effects in creation, but He Himself is free of motion, change, or being affected.” Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā 6:159
theres ur answer
LOL
Escape the matrix lil munchkin
Do you affirm Allah as identical to his acts?
I already did, it's been years since I solved the matrix
Nobu go sleep pookie pie
Avoid sending unnecessary media in serious chat, it'll affect the essence of this holy place
You're reacting to yourself
That media looks serious thou
RI doesnt destory Transtivity, its applicable in a sortal or a category, it also affirms numerical identity in a sortal.
سیباو یو بلیک انڈیویجوال
Abs alone is unclear
You think Abs is “incomplete” because it doesn’t tell us how to handle beliefs or propositions LOL
It is a problem of semantics/linguistics, leibniz law is meant for real properties not epistemic contexts/mental states of subjects
RI says: “x and y can be the same F but different G.” (its yap i know)
Transitivity fails, it become category relative, solves a knowledge problem not metaphysical and all it does is redefine identity which is foolish logically.
I swear I ran AIDA64 long enough for this multiplier😞
Holy shit😭😭😭😭😭😭
Stop using that keyboard, it sends your data directly to the developers and you can't even stop it
__________________--
The word of Allah {is} Uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
Jesus {is} the word of Allah (Sahih Muslim 195)
C. Therefore, Jesus is uncreated (inseparable from Allah)
From Above,
Isa {is} uncreated
Allah {is} uncreated
IF two things are indentical to the third thing, they must be identical to each other. Therefore, from Transitivity,
Isa = Allah
But Tawhid says Isa /= Allah, Tawhid falls in apart
It's easy urdu keyboard, right?
@tacit thistle
Alright gang you're getting muted
These scammers can't keep getting away with this 😭😭
No it's the generic one like the arabic keyboard
Google keyboard is that what you mean
his actions do not exist apart from him, nor do they imply any change in him
Acts are not identical to the essence in the sense of being the same “thing” or separate hypostases.
theyre from allah and are inseparable from his will but he is not the act
basically the acts are not identical to the essence, but are inseparable in will and source
I explained this, isa alayhi salam is created via Allahs command his word it doesnt implicate a context regarding the uncreated attribute rather shows Allah said be and he was same with adam
we need jobs lowk
Dear Otis 🥀💔
Is him identical to his action? kyahah
Acts are not identical to the essence in the sense of being the same “thing” or separate hypostases.
So, then Action is not him? Therefore it exits apart from him, if it's not him.
Who is we
He's typing a long racist text in urdu
Check the keyboard settings > privacy, turn off all the sus stuff, so yahoodis won't be able to legally track you when you type something bad about them
That explanation fails because eitherway, Isa exists prior to his creation as the spirit or the as the word. do you agree with that?
If you dont, when you say Isa {IS} the word of Allah, do you predicate Is as the predicaton or the identity?
I went to check my settings in between typing lol
What even is a yahoodi
They actually had smth like that
Google making us all complacent
Time to snort a linux distro
New species, native to madagascar
How do i see the avatar
jew
of Sanna 💀
They track you anyway scarface good luck trying to hide from the government
No? Allah instantized his speehc which created isa alayhi salam at a certain time.
Numbero uno
Log out
It's ok I will rub mud on myself to hide
😃
Allah acts, but the acts are not separate entities, nor is Allah literally identical to them.
Says the bald
They won't do anything to their shabbos goy
Better hiding spot than Saddam Hussein
Since here, word is prior to the creation of Isa,, and of the statement of {IS}, it's either identity statement or predication, in any sense, Isa exists prior to his creation.. Which would mean He is uncreated as the word or as teh Spirit.
Noooo I totally believe they won't screw me over as a company😞
They won't neglect their customers again and again 😞
Elite reference
Turn all of em off. They're still collecting data with the personalize for you shi
Yes ik
So you do affirm then Composition in God?
I want them to know how bad they are
Underground ball knowledge
Don’t let them steal your cookies
Good morning
I hope you aren't aware of cookies before internet cookies
Can we spam type jewjewjewjew to spread dominance
Don't ask about cupcakes
Well there’s cookie the food I don’t think there’s others
Aliali is superior
Is this some secret code
Stolen cookie returned
Idk is it
It is normal that kids would be associated with LGBT inclinations
Somehow, the AliA intro popped into my head
Now it won't leave
Sounds like there might be some more malicious then just cookies and cupcakes here
Even that was approved by Chinese Communist Party
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE
🏳️🌈
🎺🎺🎺🎺🗣️🗣️
What is this Cancer blessing our ears
FORK KNIFEEEEE 
Jewlius Caesar
Better than "Islam is xyz" for 15 hours straight
Khyhah 
Cookies have been used as a slang term
The acts are inseparable from his will, but they are effects in creation, not components of God lol
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
He is the word in reference to being created VIA allahs command
First one
Ok, so do you affirm compostion?
I’m never looking at cookies the same again
Do NOT accept all cookies
So, is the cause of the reference?
Don't look inappropriately, it's just food
Not really
It's your choice
Not after what I just saw Aladdin 
Putting cookies in milk and making a thick paste like thing is delicious
As in separate components/parts? nah.
Nothing sus about it cool cat
“Thick paste” 😭
I don’t know what type of cookies you’re eating but it’s not what I’m familiar with
Which is why context matters.
For example, Isa Alayhi salam is the creation via allahs command aka kalamah allah
The Qur'an is the uncreated speech of god that was instantized in time.
when Allah said be and he was it was instantized in time not indicating jesus lived beforehan
You could in theory
In reality some are too highly imbedded
But there wouldn't be anything suspicious by simply not accepting all cookies
You can also smash cookies preferably Bourbon and mix it with vanilla icecream
It tastes delicious
I’m Muslim and not an alcoholic but I’m sure it is
Cookies and ice cream does sound pretty good though
Oh I didn't mean "Don't accept any cookies"
But "do not choose to accept all of them"
You've done nearly all prohibited things except for alcohol and pork, good Muslim eh
good Muslim
Have you ever had coconut flavored ice cream?
What have I done 😭
Didn’t even know that was a thing is it good
guys i am lost in cambodia
Yes, it's definitely on my top 5
Allahu Akbar Allah Akbar
Might have to try it but I’ve never seen it in stores
Because you never go out
Pol Pot: I'd also like to know where the airport is.
I've no clue
Im going to go shopping tomorrow anyway so ill see if i can find some
Deserved
tf did i do
I hope you don't shop lift anything
With these prices I feel like it would be a crime to NOT shoplift
How do Cambodian history books evaluate Pol Pot?
i turned it into a sticker
wdym
If you want actual privacy you would need to combine a bunch of things more than just a VPN
You could have your VPN set to Finland but your browser sees your clock as time in China, what language you're using, etc. and that can be reported to the website
If you're talking about VPNs from commercial VPNs, they can mask your connection but not really hide it
They still rely on the device, connections to payment cards, connections on the same underlying network infrastructure, so those are all points where you can still be singled out
I'm just curious
Thou shouldst make thyself seen upon the stream, that we may behold with our own eyes how wretched a faminnin pilot thou art
The same thing thrice?😭
Do you think it's a way to oppose big capitalist monsters?
reading ts like “every 60 seconds in africa a minute passes”
it was a very dark time for cambodians fs
Typo, lemme fix it
i want to know why is it bad to say females ?
That too but also free cinnamon rolls which is the treat of the trip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH4lywFQTfU Every time this song appears, Pol Pot comes up. I quite like this song with its strange lyrics.
《看 貓頭鷹》是一首柬埔寨民歌,與紅色高棉 波布政權並無任何關係。
"Sat Tee Touy" or "Look At The Owl" is a Cambodian folk song, it had nothing associated to Khmer Rouge or Pol Pot.
Cambodian Cassette Archives - Khmer Folk And Pop Music Vol.1
*This video has been uploaded only for the purpose of sharing music﹑hi...
ohh this song is actually not related to pol pot but it’s a song about an animal
I remember you had the strongest pc among all serious chat enjoyers
I know
an owl is a ទីទុយ
Unfortunately, the composer of this song was killed during Pol Pot's reign.
i don’t actually rlly know the meaning
Get a strong magnetic keychain so you can remove the tags from cool jackets
but apparently the owl is drunk or smth
why r chinese ppls listening to this😭😭
It was a joke
oh
But it's still a metaphysical parts because You have real distinct properties in God
i also use females sometimes
So I can be coolest cat
females and males
Wassup serious chat
Bombaclaaaaaaaat
Because many videos related to Pol Pot like to use this music as background music.
I just spent 8 hours drinking with some indians
I have a doctors appointment at 7 to see if my piss is clean
healthy body btw
Feathers or dots
and i was like yall im in an English server with a bunch of people who cant stop discussing islam
Have you been doing drugs
LOL tbh there’s so many pol pot memes
I was like yo guys why is everyone discussing islam
I understand, but that is only applicable, if you dont make the identity statement or the predication as Is, where your hadith does
And they were like modi
awww bro doing pregnancy test i hope it’s a girl
Dots
Obviously
All immigrants are here, that's interesting
@fresh plover where are you from if you don't mind asking?
i am not an immigrant
Metaphysical parts would have
-
independent existence
-
interaction or composition
Gods attributes lack both.
I don't do drugs I only drink alhamdlah 🙏🏻
Your ISP assigns you an IP
The VPN opens a TCP connection between your IP and the VPN's IP
The problem is, your ISP can see that your IP has opened a the connection, it'll probably see that it's the only connection/multiple connections sometimes, and that it's unintelligible
They can even check for the VPN provider's IP and find out which company it is
So they can tell that you're using a VPN
If we're talking about networks alone, then they "perfectly" mask what you're doing
But privacy isn't just about networks, you still have the real world, if you're enough of a target to a government/legal institution, they could get some data directly from the VPN provider, if a warrant is given
Mashallah brother olivander showing those good Muslim values
@wary oak speaking of discussing Islam.

