#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 601 of 1
🤣
America woke up, Europe's awaking, we don't have to wake because once we see such influence appears in our society it means end of it
our ideological value of dealing with such recessionism ideology is still increasing
what is this shit
twin theres slowmode
God if you exist, Strike this nice guy down
god if u exist give me a 16 year old japanese boy right now
Konnichiwa arigatou gozaimasu
cant see people talking about religion 

@deft sedge PLEEEEEEASE
Why?
JUST GIVE ME A CHANCE GIVE ME ONE CHANCE PLEAAAAAASE LEMME CRACK
bobby what the hell

im not 16 
I DONT WANNA PLAY WITH U ANY MORE
If you are over 18, it's really against TOS
im young at heart
What size shoes do you wear
Can you send a pic of your feet I'm a visual learner
*We are visual learners
RANDY NOOOOOOOO
40
we call it 40 here but idk what unit we are even using
Damn you got femboy feet
not possible if you want to lick your screen
that could be poisonous
You got petite feet bro
You could earn some proper money online with that
3 or 1
@summer sphinx i got you a seller
im unconvinced any god exist
Does he also hang them off the train...
what the fuck are you talking about?
Is this a split reference
Inside joke
I watched nearly 20 minutes of it, and skipped to the "most watched" part, i don't think I'd watch him again anytime soon, and most likely I would never recommend this channel
It's not my type, I'm sorry
what
that was boring
I watched the compilation, not the one with Alex
oh
wait let me suggest you my favorites
Stop ignoring me Matt

I like well put together discussions where the point is not about defeating the other party, and it's more about coming to the truth. It was also filled with logical fallacies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJ3PFKnlK0
this is one of my favorites
Call the show on Sundays 4:30pm-6:00pm CT: 1-512-686-0279 or use your computer to save on long-distance charges: http://tiny.cc/calltheshow
► LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/atheistcommunityofaustin
► Don't like commercials? Become a patron for ad-free content & more: https://www.patreon.com/theatheistexperience
► Find all of our links her...
why the host?
Yes the host matt dillahunty, he also never went to the college
And was unable to answer simple things
Questioning a question isn't that great
Can we turn this into #💭|general again
and he was devout christian for 20 or more years
Nvm... Mb for asking
but thats not the point
Where's Minecraft
Did he finally learn
Learn what
I'm sorry dude but i don't watch this kind of debates, just personal preferences
Did he get muted or smth
what simple answer?
Yes
For what
Denying people's existence/right to live
and what logical fallacies
But that's what he was banned for a month ago 💀

can you tell me what truth he should have told about?
Reasonable reason
Sybau you don't have the American visa yet
ur pakistani?
Can't say that
You racist, just because he's indian and you didn't "show him your major" 💔
doland trump whyyy

why cant i say pure💔
Source?
He says his papa is in a soldier deployed at the Kashmir border so he knows more than everyone in this server about the Kashmir conflict
whats worse is that all his messages are deleted as well
And he uses that to say whatever the fuck he wants about POK
😭😭😭
A great treasure was lost that day
"He's one of the people told what to do by totally honest people, our government would do nothing wrong"
new york times
Jai Kukumber🙏
Jai shree kukumber. Free my boy 🙏🏻
The next firecracker goes out to lil bro... Majored in JEE and LeetCode🙏💯🔥😍
yea
because i became one
Your ass is NOT a native
What is three and what is one 🤔
filthy booster BLACK
Worst part is I forgot to cancel my nitro
I got 1 month, this shit renewed
Now I'm not able to eat
Sorry, the genes related to my skin colour are dominant 😎 👆
im happy for you
so a native can score 100 in a english test compared to a Chinese English graduate?
girls used to have 37/38
You're entitled to have different opinions, if you like him it's great
guys are around 40-44
But personally I won't watch it
which logical fallacy is used here?
Brother this is male feet in Asia
he asked for a clarification question. how is that a logical fallacy?
Normal

thats not even a argument or rebuttal, thats a question
Some people I met they are male have more bigger foot I call them Bigfoot
do you believe in bigfoot?
No
this image makes me poop
why not?
i'm waiting
How much for the other one
There's ad homanin at end
lmao
The question was about the GOD in general, not a particular God,
I don't like him and I won't watch him
by not answer the clarification
That's what an ad hominem is
ik
but all he did was asked a clarrification question
and the caller was like, it doesnt matter to me, why are you questioning me
am i the host?
The question was about the GOD in general, not a particular God,
If a person cannot understand it most likely I won't watch him for philosophical knowledge
and blah blah
thats silly
Sure
he was leading to a question
The guy fell under the category of the straw man fallacy
and he refused to answer
There is no Bigfoot there is my father walking in the forest to drink water and urinating at 3am
I'm moving
Existence of god in general and a particular god are distinct things bro
and in the end when asked," what god you believe in, he said, "oh it doesnt matter to me"
But size 40 bro this is small for men here I have one friend he is his feet is 43
are there anymore parts where u think he made logical fallacy?
43 inches 💀
It's a straw man bro
do you have evidence of that suggest theres no bigfoot?
Just watch the first 3 min of video you sent me, you'll find Ad homanin
That guy is equivalent to Muhammad hijab
where?
You can take it dw
Please do removing you brain dirty
so u dont like him bc of he curses and attacks?
That's normal though
I have 44.5
Because his explanations are not satisfactory for my standards
are you a perfectionist?
Oh, that? I am native though😭 My parents hate the fact that I haven't cared about the other languages and would rather learn arabic and french
whats ur standards?
He asked which god to a question about the existence of god in general. He's basically diverting from the actual point.
#Go back to India
And I'm not going to reply to you, because I've already told you it's not my kind of content yet you're still forcing me to like him
Brother scientists studied this the hair and foot are hoax hair from someone butt hair maybe and the foot they just carve in the grass how it possible, the only explanationation I can say is somebody uncle grandfather father from another monster is big and hairy chest
There should be a rule here
Minecraft ishe femboy
Religious discussions only on Friday and Sunday
and he was asking which god, hes still talking about gods, but in specific, that was a clarrification question
so ur saying theres no evidence of bigfoot?
I would ride my bicycle to you, and this is how you treat me 💔
There is evidence that bigfoot don’t exisr
Is bro equating God with bigfoot
It's "A generalized question" not a specified one. Semantics bruv, it needn't be clarified.
Maybe you have sample of Bigfoot urination that I’m haven’t heard of
They redeemed the seriousness 💔
He is sending butt in general chat and I’m coming here to escapa
WHY DID YOU REDEEEM IT💔💔💔
If yall were stuck in a desert and you were dehydrated would you drink your urine
Alone or...
That is reminding me of one lady she did that when she got lost in a trail while she hiking
Yes, it's sterile and a great antiseptic. Perfect to drink. Birds like vultures piss on their legs to clean themselves 😄
400000000000% yes
Ok ur wrong, and let me explain
There is no evidence that Bigfoot exist, and there is no evidence that Bigfoot doesn't exist
So the most intellectually reasonable thing to assess this is by saying im unconvinced any bigfoot exists untill the evidence is found, so u reject the hypothesis or claim that bigfoot exist bc lack of evidence
Depends on if it's fresh and warm or not, I think the warmth would ruin it
Why can't we say he doesn't exist bc of the lack of evidence. The claim holds equal weight
It would be like drinking soup
cus then ur making a claim that he doesnt exist and you have the burden of proof to prove that
But then I can say the same to you, you're saying he exists which is a claim as well.
Sure you can say that but I have said to you that they have ‘evidence’ as in the evidence is other animal hair so this not Bigfoot this is an animal we know
where did i say he exist?
or it exist
I’m telling you this Bigfoot no he not there it’s my father
/poll
Do atheists always question religious people's beliefs because:
- Dunning-Kruger effect
- Fear of missing out on heaven
then its not the evidence for THE BIGFOOT, but something which has nothing to with bigfoot right
I was speaking about the "claim that bigfoot exists bc of the lack of evidence"
No, no one wants to talk to me about it
what was dunning kruger i forgot
please talk about feet with me and ollie
It is evidence for Bigfoot bc the research in Bigfoot not somebody chest hair
Stop flipping people off and sending butt salad face
how can you justify its existance without evidence?
Cognitive bias where people who know the least think they know the most
oh yes
call me that again & i will call you shawarma sexual so sybau
We can't, that's the answer. How can we justify it's inexistence without evidence?
It's a loop
W sexuality
Shwarma amazing
can you like refine the sentence
You are salad face 🥦🥬🥕
It is evidence for Bigfoot bc the research in Bigfoot not somebody chest hair
no u cant to that but you can reject the claim, rejection is doesnt have burden of prove

Bigfoot not somebody chest hair
tf does this mean?
What do you mean rejection doesn't need proof 🤨
@shell hemlock
yes correct ur getting it
You're an atheist aren't you
rejection is not a postive statement
but saying it doesnt exist, is a positive statement
what does this as to with bigfoot?
It about Bigfoot not somebody chest hair
It's a stereotypical behavior I've observed
Correct, as long as you don't make a counter-claim 
I reject this idea
ur saying bigfoot exist?

Something wrong with you
yea
^
first of all can you like speak in fluent english, im having trouble understanding ur sentences
basis of what?
Well well well

I am speaking English not Spanish
you reject the bigfoot claim on basis lack of evidence
thats a idea which is logically fulfilled, so on what basis are you rejecting the idea
Why are you starting this rn what is your motive
can you just tell me, how many grammartical mistake are in here
What is your intention
on what?
"If you reject the idea of bigfoot for a lack of evidence, why then do you believe in God?"
You asking me this stuff and trying to argue

Fair question tbh
i never did bring god in any of this bigfoot argument
So what is your intention with this
We can agree Bigfoot doesn’t exist right
Or you think Bigfoot exist
just tryna explain about evidence, lack of evidence, rejection of a claim and stuff
Ok ?
these both are a positive statement
all what i explain went in vain
😭

my postion is on bigfoot is, "im reject the claim of bigfoots existance based on lack of evidence"
whos talking to you
Ladies and gentlemen
I present to you the donkey
this is null statement @shell hemlock
theres only one sticker that can stop your yapping
allow me......
😂
im gay
ss taken
why would feel any negative connatation?
@uncut tiger why
I am going stop talking about this cuz I am wasting my battery with something we alrdy agree on when I can go looking at Diaz butt emojis
On my side it was kingmarw and frenzy who got that😭

our conclusion is same but the method ur using has logical flaws
Hello ducko
Heoo
How’s it going
I've only bad news or depends
Average human beans starting argument just to start an argument
Ok let’s do both
I might go back to work before school bcs school gets delayed probably
AAAAAA
Whyyyyy
Something ig
Saying “Bigfoot exists” is a positive claim because you’re adding something to reality. If you make that claim, you’ve gotta bring evidence.
Saying “Bigfoot does not exist” is also a positive claim because you’re still making a statement about reality, just in the opposite direction. That also needs evidence.
Saying “I don’t believe Bigfoot exists because there’s no good evidence” is different. That’s not a positive claim at all, it’s a rejection based on lack of evidence. And since you’re not claiming anything about reality itself, you don’t need to provide evidence to justify that stance.
Here
Time to shit on @uncut tiger
Basic epistemology 👆
@shell hemlock epistemology
whats up
ptas new movie comming up
Why do u change everything 🙄
new personality
Ik and I'm very excited
You suck
Go find a ditch and die
Fym u didn't like PTA movies
There is evidence of Bigfoot not existing you sister twister
whats that evidence?
Better than there will be blood 🙄
na i didnt like it
but it was better then the master
You have terrible taste in movies.
and inherent vice
Oh my goodness I don’t think your intention is about Bigfoot or something at all

Bro is dissing on one of the greatest movies ever made 😭
So do you believe Bigfoot exist @thorny steeple
dw it took me months to understand basic epistemology
i dont
Okay end of story, the story completed, th ebook closed, narration ended
What's your next hot take? @thorny steeple
Citizen Kane sucks?
Or Lawrence of arabia
havent seen em
im not saying there isnt any value to the movie
i dont get it or its not made for me
Makes sense. You're a child. It was made for responsible adults
in the end i just score a movie based on how much i enjoyed it
idk if im gonna watch it future
You don't deserve to watch it
ur ignoring the most crucial part, how we get here, and someone could be a non believer in bigfoot for bad reasons and if you apply those reason to find other stuff out, it will lead you to wrong answers
ok this is a little offensive
did you watch under the skin?
Okay so your true intention is to engage in religion discussion, correct ?
And how Islam bad blah blah blah oh you are Muslim you kill everybody
If you talk this way or you want to get into this discussion I won’t be here sorry
Not offensive enough
We had a whole conversation about it
No more kottbullar ☹️
I hate paper straws man
Makes my drink taste like newspaper
If I use this in a religion, ur mind will make up an answers to actually defend the answer dishonestly thats why i tried to explain the example the epistemology on Bigfoot to make u understand, but ur still ignoring the method and focusing on the conclusion
epistemology is just study of knowledge
can u give me summary of movie
Ask chatgpt
well i wanted to know why you liked it
chatgpt will give me a conclusion of critics summary
I was not being dishonest throughout our conversation actually you were the one being dishonest because I asked you “what is your motive and intention” and you said “to explanation to you about evidence, lack of evidence” - no this is not your true intention so you were being dishonest
im not saying u will voluntarily
ull do it involuntarily
ur mind has never been thought out of religion so it will make up defenses
and question ur foundation from childhood to right now
which your brain is not comfortable for
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
if you wanna read more on how to find and understand knowlegde here
Actually I thought we were just talking about Bigfoot and whether or not I think he existed
So I don’t know what you are trying to aim for
@shell hemlock
this is all what i have been telling you for past 45 mins
Stop this useless discussion
i was using bigfoot in place of god
bc you dont have evidence that god exist, but you dont have the god doesnt exist
but the third postion exist
which is idk if god exist
which is what atheism is about
atheism is not that god doesnt exist
its that i reject god based on lack of evidence
Aye don't harrash her
Yes atheism and antitheism get confused quite often
🤨
damn im harrasing her without vulgur words

neither am i attacking
It showed how people are shallow inside. We admire beauty from the outside but once it's gone and the illusion removed. We show our true evil.

i didnt ask for moral
She might take it as harras. Girls here report a lot, I meant 
i ask for summary
It's a film about humans and their nature
you think mods gonna made be, when i havent even went agaisnt rules?
Are you a fan of Matt Dilhunty?
hmm
could say so
💴 Welcome to Positive.Manhood - Inspiring videos about Motivation, Mindset and Money
🔔 Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with the best advices
Dominik Tarczynski | Conservatives | EU Parliament | United Kingdom
WE HAD ENOUGH
So do I but I went to jail 
Oh lol
thats it?
do you know hat summery is
Hi 🙂
😭
I ain't gonna write a long ass summary of a movie I watched years ago
i asked for this
thats a paragraph
My goodness, you are so innocent
like this
She was an outsider trying her best to fit in. She wanted to feel like us and act like us. After a while she found what humans are actually like
ooh
damn
My recollection of that movie isn't perfect. But I remember blown out by it
WHY YOU ARE USING A MAC
It's not a your type of movie
better then windows
HOW DOES THAT POSSIBLE WHICH MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS ?
i wanna find it out myself
Lars von trier is far from your type of director
I need explain
but i cant get the 4k version of it
in what perspective that Mac is better than Windows I wonder
You should watch Michael bay movies
appearence ?
i brought the lowest spec mac and its working from 5 years, my windows would give up in 4th or 3rd year
Windows is the worst OS out there
fuck u
Bro is mental
why would an OS relating to age of using
Macs are good as pre bought PCs that you won’t do anything special on, but windows makes more sense for work as they can be cheaper while maintaining the same functions needed for efficiency, or you could build a better windows PC for gaming or advanced graphics
bud I'm talking about the OS not the PC
if i get the 4k version of melancholia id watch it like rn
Try torrent
if you are buying a windows PC and you would say that was trash which make perfect sense
like? thats a brower?
but for the OS I don't really get it
MacOS is probably the worst OS ever to be made
even worse than Linux, at least you could use Linux in server
Kids don't know torrenting 😭
i mean i had a windows laptop and if its in 2nd year and i played a 4k movie it will degrade so fast, but that doesnt happen in macbook
Bingo
That has to do with hardware, not operating system
ok ill do a gpt explainin on it
then it make sense you should try to assemble a PC yourself and install the windows
that would be better than you expected
It does actually
You can even make a few quick adjustments to windows laptops. RAM is really easy to upgrade if needed
thats too expensive and i dont play games i use it for studies, movies and basic stuff so macbook is also light weight
All Apple products are made to degrade fast (I own 4)
in macbook?
i dont see any problem with my macbook except the battery
andi ts been 5 years
also i use it while charging so that probelm is also solved
I own a tablet and 2 iphones that make sense
Yeah my phones battery when I got it was super good, probably the best phone battery I’ve seen. Within 2 months it was average and within 6 it was bad, they’re made to wear out quickly so you buy another one
Yes, I have an m3 air, you're not running into battery issues yet because you're circumventing the need for one
Exactly! It's not even a conspiracy theory
mine is m1 air
its been 79% for months
i dont think ill ever stitch to a windows laptop
Why?
Are batteries non-replaceable on the iphone?
I don’t think so? If they are you would need to send the device to apple
Why can't you just order an apple battery and replace it in local mob repair shop
Hello everyone
Yes, the EU keeps them in check
All phones suck now
Let’s say apple doesn’t like that 😂
In the name of making them thinner they are all impractical and expensive to own
What about the dinosaur phone
ill buy this
Something a xiaomi user would say
The shapes are weird
Isn't that the frog phone
Idk
No. They all suck
I think each OS has its purpose, I use all 3 personally
iphone is just better in everyway for me
The EU will introduce a right to repair regulation #soon hopefully it'll make phones great again
i also need to buy a tv
Get kosher phone
And even this wouldn't be enough because Google wants to limit unsigned APKs now
LG WOULD GO FINE
Watch the apple profits plummet lmao
We need another fork of Android or another OS from Linux
i like everything about apple except their pricing
Get S23 ultra 
It will become more and more annoying and difficult to do, and having to root a phone just for unsigned APKs is overkill
Plus you lose access to banking apps and more
I wouldn't recommend buying an expensive TV if you don't actually watch TV
My TV and the PS5 are just there to collect dust
i already getting an iphone
50,000 ruppe is a reasonable price for tv india
It'll get to the point where phones will need to be cracked just like a console, and that's not good
i dont have space for pc
Investing in a good projector and mediocre tv would be a better idea
That's around $500 right?
Can someone explain? I'm not American
623 dollars
No that's half a lakh, should be 600
A laptop is enough to watch movies for 2 person
Close
charlie kirk reborn
thats 55,000
my last tv was 55,000
I want buyers
This close to Ramadan Carpe?
Who wants to send me some fucking money
Get chinese TVs
623 USD for a tv that's nothing
hell naw
GOING FOR LG THATS SOUHT KOREAN
Gotta grind yk
That guy tried to assassinate a ton of Minnesota democratic lawmakers, nightmare on elm street is a horror movie, one of the democratic lawmakers on his list was Tim Walz
I regret getting bravia, for the same price i could have got chad chinese tv
ok elon musk
oh
those two dems in minnesota?
Yeah
fuck that guy
Xiaomi, one plus, motorola might be more affordable
i aint trying out new
Someone was making fun of ayurveda a few days ago and you immediately sprung to mind
😀
It is funny
the first tv was best in sound and visual it was lg, it worked fine, then we brough samsung and it fucked up
going for LG again
Is the post controversial? What else is there that I'm not getting
Bravia gang
People learn from experience
Is it because he made a joke?
Man I gotta make sum fucking money
Idk, Mike Lee is a representative
aint no way buying an sony
And fuck my beard and trimmer
Sorry Senator
what
Fkahh beard and trimmer
i have a question
I just botched myself
do you understand the distinction?
@manic juniper
Lol he could've done so with an alt account
When will you leave India?
Yeah but he has to be insane because everything is a political opportunity to blame the left
or he could just not done it
In American politics there is no penalty for being insane, it is good to be as insane as you can be
Yes they are trying hard to blame the democrat voter base as well or so it seems
Nothing will change anyway
Unless it’s for the worst of course
Wut
@formal pilot
Sure
so do you wanna go wiht a test?
What do you mean by that
to know that u uunderstand and not just saying sure
What's wiht
lest go wiht unicorns as a example
do you believe in unicorns?
just answer in simplicity
cus im leading to smth
Don't need to give him the questionnaire, he doesn't even want to get a passport
I have insufficient evidence to believe that they exists, because it's scientifically not plausible
An animal with high bone density as a horse cannot fly easily
My unicorn is different, it's better
Dismiss all evidence for a God
"I want proof"
Creation of the universe is a theory as well
"Their proof is correct"
Pegasus has maniraptosaurian wings for some reasons
Is atheism just a circlejrk of who can link the most wiki articles
Are you saying scientifically it's not possible for a unicorn to fly? and thats the evidence for them to not exist?
Must be Anabolic steroids
Always in the whey
The bone density of bats is lower than that of birds, it's just that bats have bone marrow unlike most bird bones
If there is a God I hope he curses you for eternity for adding IT here
I see people who believe in God such thing which does not exist would assume other people who don't believe it as atheists
I'm saying it's not plausible based on our current understanding of science that a horse like animal can fly
The difference has to with the lack of marrow and the air sacs the birds have to lower their overall density closer to that of the air, kinda like fishes with their nictitating membrane
Because of heavy bones
yeah your methodlogy is wrong
actually atheism was still a religion, but people who are unaffilated was out of this cycle of madness
this is arguemnt from ignorance fallacy
My biggest issue with atheism is the inconsistency
I can't be saved..
I'm serious rn
Sure buddy
you don't need any inconsistency in any religion
do you know bumble bee?
Get me sum online job bro
they are all created by human in certain period
Not that, it's a joke
I gotta start selling my socks or sum
God is metaphysical
"Show me empirical evidence"
Dark matter isn't observable
"Omg it makes up most of the universe bro"
We know how bumblebees can fly, they beat their wings faster than other bees
im leadin to something
it's just a special type of ideology as same as when we talking about economics we would say socialism, communism, capitalism
It wasn't even a mystery
Neither do you in atheism
Stop believing in reels which says it's impossible to explain how a bumblebee can fly
but for the view of the world we used to call it religion
It's well known shid
Show metaphysical evidence 
Wait wait, bats have lower bone density than birds?
Yes, birds actually have the densest bones unless you include the empty air in them, only then their density is the lowest because they lack marrow in most of them or all
Why u don't buy me no gift bro
I'm not an atheist, I'm unaffiliated
Send feet in dm
I don't believe in anything with 100% certainty
Aight bet
You too Minecraft
Birds made up for their lack of marrow by increasing the density of the bone itself
I only observe what seems to be logical and useful which we would have an actual use on this one
including the view of the world
Classic reptile move, take a good design and make it better
it's not hard to imagine two turtles on the shit ground would view the piss by the human as the god's holy water
This is why reptiles are inherently superior
Why not if they can filter it and store it in the bladder for months
Believing in a God can limit your freedoms btw
don't you realize believe in God does not exist in 100% certainty would also limit your freedom ?
freedom could never be absolute
Bro actually sent feet pics 💀💀💀💀
freedom bascially means you have the most leverage to switch sides or adjust the threshold
Yes, but overall pneumatic bones must be lighter than average bones with bone marrow
Not only that

Rate it bro
They increased density to make up for the lack of marrow, since they can hardly heal if they break
They will shatter
Ngl more pale than what I assumed
Type shi
I thought you'd have darker feet because you're a (redacted)
@plain ruin
Your turn @plain ruin
Where does the blood is formed in birds 💀
bumblebee has a bigger body then its wings but they fly
Are you saying it's biologically impossible for a unicorn to fly?
hi
"Matt" are you an atheist
guys who's Muslim here?
ignorance is here that bc science cant explain it it doesn't exist
it's very obvious he is
@severe burrow
why would u say that
science could explain it exists
Theists think if science can't explain it then it exists lol
It's a question, I forgot the question mark
I gotta a heated question for em
sure give me the sources
He is Shia btw
you need to learn a little bit neurology and probability
if thats the case then why are the theist? science cant proof god
oh no haha the question will be even more heated 😭😭
They still have it but it's not distributed in all bones, ratites have more because they don't care about flight
The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report questionnaire that makes pseudoscientific claims to categorize individuals into 16 distinct "personality types" based on psychology. The test assigns a binary letter value to each of four dichotomous categories: introversion or extraversion, sensing or intuition, thinking or feeling, and ...
Ask it bro I'm curious
you would find some personality that naturally possess the higher chance of being ignorance
I thought that was gen z crap
science cant say it cus they dont have the body of unicorns do examine before making a claim on it
Doesn't believe Palestine exists
Believes in MBTI
and by probability therefore it exists
Matt you aren't my targeted audience for a discussion 😭
i dont think they are accurate
Please let me breathe
u could just answer it, so i could explain the flaw with the methodolgy
it was a scientific indicator idk if you feel their test is wrong or something that's none of my business
whhhattt doesn't believe that Palestine exists
but by practical definition, they are very scientific
I already answered you
Science can't prove ball lightning yet does that mean it doesn't exist?
you can still question their availability of the test they made to test out your personality which makes 100% sense
you can't test one's personality by a single test
Welcome to #🧠|serious-chat 😭
but the personality nature definition itself was included in this indicator
I wonder where blood is formed in an animal with open circulation
Hi
it's like you could define rich and poor by productivity, but you can't calculate the productivity very precisely
idk what that is but neither science can prove it, nor it can disprove, cus in both it would require proof to say it does or it doesnt
but u dont have a way to examine it in the first place
So many pings...
The sheep
Answer carpe
science took 100 years to prove gravitational waves and it was proven in 2015 does it mean it didn't exist before 2015?
I don't feel like it's hard to understand for you @fresh flower
you are free to not to believe in science, nobody force you to do that
oh no I meet Palestine people here in my f country getting hospitalised for insane injuries and here someone says the country doesn't exist
Sorry
Dont speak to server ruiners...
well theres is a third postion which is called rejection of claim until sufficient evidence is provided
but you pay the consequences of question the science itself
It's pseudoscience. It's insane to be an atheist and demand science then believe in a pseudoscientific self-reported personality test
I DIDNT DO IT IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE
They don't have blood, isn't that unique to vertebrates. Insects have haemolymph, mollusks have different types of "blood"-like liquids
that consequence was very hard, and it's proven by history
Hii!
My name is Muneeb Iqbal, ’m preparing for my IELTS exam and looking for a study partner to practice IELTS Speaking. If anyone else is also preparing for IELTS, I’d love to connect and practice together. Please DM me if you’re interested!
Was it him
Idk bro...
what i believe in scientific methodology
the thing ur saying is not what science shows
May have been huzzain
find one that is not pseudoscience before you question it
and by the way what's the reason you would think it's a pseudoscience
you still need prove its inavailability
I'm in the same mood
Random first article, you'll find many many more
like if you would say they are not so wide to include every personality or they are not scientifically proven
That's not even in the ballpark of what I said, gravity had always existed, but believing in it when enough evidence has demonstrated it would scientifically logical to belive
agreed it's bullshit
I got INTJ, which stands for Introverted, iNtuitive, Thinking, and Judging dude that's so subjective
Not scientifically proven = pseudoscience
I remember doing it when I was 13
could u explain the case with plate tectonics where the geologists dismissed it for decades until they found evidence in mid 1960s?
Because you answered the questions yourself 😭
but how I'm saying the indicator itself was scientifically proven but not the test
evidence proved them wrong
It was proven right tho
dude, you got a test yourself and you would question the test is invaild that make sense I never say that was scientific
What you're doing is the equivalent of a prophet saying he saw God
I was saying the indicator itself was scienfitic
did you just try understand what I'm saying ?
yes thats what im saying they were right afterthe evidence is enough to warrent believe
It's not😭
if you took a random test or their official test which is not scientific I don't care if the test result was invaild because it make sense if you think it's invaild, and it's not scientifically proven
Hence why it's pseudoscience
Yeah it’s BS, I got INTP-T
but for the indicator, may I ask, can you find another personality indicator which is more scientific than this one ?
their test is trash
but I'm saying the indicator
you can take some taste based on recommended by psychologists
OCEAN
I'm not saying the fucking test or your subjective feeling which both could be invaild
how does that psychologists could convince you by their word ?
are you trying to listen some word to random people which believes they are scientific ?
I answered it twice, the INDICATOR is pseudoscience
OCEAN is not pseudoscience ?
cus they study the brain and their behaviour
personality is exactly that
No, OCEAN is scientific
I understand withholding belief until evidence shows up. But claiming certainty that God doesn’t exist is itself a claim.
What evidence convinces you that non existence is certain?
Big Five test is most accurate by them
newton also study a lot about physics but he didn't create general relativity which overthrow some of his idea
how could you be so certain about one guy's idea by what they have studied so long which is 100% scientific ?
im not saying god doesnt exist AND im unconvinced any god exist
do you get the distinction?
why wouldn't any of you question if it's vaild or not ?
I know little to nothing about online jobs
I mean if you are just to try an ideology or religion without any analysis which makes perfect sense because that's what the 99% of people would do
you trust the consensus of their believe with amount of hard evidence they provide
That's your personal belief tho
at least that provides some availability but it doesn't mean their word is 100% truth
if I would say in ancient era that should be pray for God to cure your damage on your leg by leaking out of the blood which contains the poison, would you believe that's the truth so far because you don't have any choice ?
even if I remember the Catherine II of Russia ever done such thing and she survived in that situation which provides a little bit availability of this could work fight against a disease
correct im not posing they post absolute certainty on it
you can never be abosolute certain about anything in life
but you dont need absolute certainty you need closest to 100% to form a robust based on hard evidence of concensus of scientist
I get that you’re unconvinced but if you’re not claiming God is impossible, doesn’t that mean it’s at least logically possible that God exists?
no, god can be possible
but until evidence arrives, im gonna halt my belief on them on basis of lack of evidence
I mean there's no such absolute thing exists as scientifical concept because the science was never about what you believed for, the science was about it's able to vaildate yourself under direct observation
correct
if a science that makes you believe it, it's not science, it's religion which was called science
Where are you from
the science would never enforce anyone to believe it
that's what I'm trying say, the core of science was always to question, to validate, rather than believe it
it's your personal belief I can't change your mind
that's the most fundamental difference between religion
science is a methodology and it gives you more then just claims, it gives you evidence and warrants your trust of confidence in that, on basis of amount of evidence, which is the most logical stance
what religion really enforce was the belief, once you have believed it, you won't question it's availability, you fall into a cult which the authority would use to achieve their interest
yea
no
sorry, its a rejection of claim
im not believing in anything
im not posing a world wihtout god
We're still an under developed civilization so yk
I'm just giving you a very simple example of this, I'm very crystal clear about how these two are so different
neither am i posing a world with a god
After the imposition of tariffs on China, Arab countries' exports to America increased, especially from Egypt, Morocco and Algeria
im saying im gonna warrent my belief based on lack of evidence
I'm not saying I'm fighting against the religion, which that could be a tool for me to control people if I was in power
man..
now I'm not so I would suck it up very naturally
so do you wanna check if you actually understand?
like a simple test?
i mean we're still an under developed civilization we can't interpret everything yet
I don't feel like if a test would be questioned by you have to post it first
no like im gonna ask few series of question
it wil take 1 minute
to be simple that's the third world, no offense
for example lets take flying elephants
do you believe in flying elephants?
answer in simple half sentence cus im leading to next question
under a viable physical condition an elephant could fly
u fucked up
Yes
you just need some fuels
u fucked up in the first question
lmao
why you think an elephant can't fly ?
they lack aerodynamics weight and muscle power
give a reason they can't fly in any condition
do you believe in flying elephants?
lets do it again
an elephant could fly under viable physical condition
it can tho
i feel like a teacher whos explaining maths
ok fine
you can even fly under viable physical condition, but you don't have such robust muscle I believe
is this a hypothetical?
maybe in the future we could change one's DNA to make it able to fly
im talking like could they fly based on their ear flapping
Hell n
explain your question kind sir
fly basically means floading in the air, which could be achieved by changing few variables
like at space where there's no gravitation you are flying
all u need is aerodynamics right weight and muscle power
no my variables in the world is bound by reality
can they fly yes or no?
or idk
absolutely yes in certain condition
give me evidence of flying elephants
bro are you mentally challenged
im trying to explain epistemology
evidence
Just watched the film
film is a cartoon based on fiction
it's like give me evidence of the God does not eixst
which is technically invaild
exactly
It's based on a true story
ur getting it
It's a documentary
that's invaild
finally we are making progress
so you should have sad, idk if flying elephanst could fry
thats the reasonable position
idk if I'm your dad
"give me the evidence you're my father DNA doesn't matter"
that's a very resonable position at your logic
we're trying to tell you that under the correct condition anything can fly
u have to modify their body
it's unachievable by our science yet
but it can be done with more advanced technology
no he's just trying to circle around the typical philosophy of question one's inexistence
cus to say they fly u have to give evidence and to say they dont fly u have to give evidence of them not flying but then u have to anazlye a flying elephants which u dont have
eventually ur postion would be idk
then in that case I would respond the same way back to him
have u ever heard about the laws of aerodynamics
you didn't provide any evidence of I'm not dad therefore I'm your dad ?
Are you just explaining what an agnostic stance is
i can prove that with evidence, dna
theres no evidence for flying elephanst
the evidence is what makes the huge leap
oh what's that
what's that DNA
how do you know your DNA wasn't saying I was not your dad
No because it could be a case of convergent evolution
bruh go read null hypothesis
its so annoying
to explain u
Or a very coincidentally lucky horizontal gene transfer
im not talking hypothetically
in reality bound by laws
yeah but if you seek for evidence to prove one's inexistence by the way of you can't find one right now, you could ignore its existence
Evidence isn't always direct
??? Didn't you ask about flying elephants
like if you would say a flying elephant does not exist because you never observe one, that make sense, but it doesn't mean it can't be exist technically
yea
he doesn't even know what he's talking about icl
yes but in reality
and in reality it's very viable to fly an elephant
in reality it can fly but not At This Moment
In reality there is no such thing known to us as flying elephant
wtf does this mean
What if they flapped their ears really fast
It won't work
If you talk hypothetically we may find evidence or a living specimen. Just as hypothetically your DNA may not prove that your father is your biological father
you can't prove how an elephant is so unique to other species that used to be so different at carrying on the space or at the air
they need very specific modifications to their body
#Bees are not real
Mammoths were scammed
elephant is nowhere near the aerodynamics law
so are you saying they dont exist?
"Known to us"
which means what you are trying to prove a thing that has different weight and the space of containing this which is incapability to carry on
ur saying u dont know?
but in reality it's very practical you could carry it on the space or air
wha
Yes but I doubt it is possible, mammals are limited
so india's laws are all toilet papers?
thank you, you do get epistemology
LRWEITP
We have flying squirrels but they're unable to fly
You have to understand that it is possible but not naturally
It is naturally possible
I need a pic about this line
what is naturally possible?
Flying elephant?
LAW/RULE WITHOUT ENFORCEMENT IS TOILET PAPER
im not fucking talking about possiblity but on evidence
Over millions of years elephants could develop flight
tf
is it possible rn?
They wouldn't look like elephants at all
then they are not flying elephants
how could u get evidence on some topic that is untouched and completely made up
you cant, so ur position becomes "i dont know"
According to cladistics they'd be
so without your evidence, your position also becomes "I don't know"
As in going that path? Difficult to predict
exactly
what what im saying
for so long
-10/10 explainer
until the evidence is presented u withhold the belief
but it is possible only if it is modified to thaf position
thats logically flawed
how's that
i mean if it's actually modified to that position it can no longer be called an elephant
guys.... you're still at the same topic?
u dont start by warrenting belief, and then look for evidence
Only colloquially
its opposite
Cladistically it's an elephant
Even if one day it evolved to look like a crowbar it'd still be an elephant
do yall belief in ghost?
are you mocking matt or you're an atheist?
I don't
based on what?
both
Yes
but i also his arguments
what warrents ur belief on ghost?
based on that there isn't a good evidence for their existence
ur correct ding ding ding
A group of ghosts spoke to me while I was awake
because it doesn't have a physical body
thats another claim
with another burden of proof
if something physically doesn't exist it becomes really hard to prove
just like 4d objects
what is that called?
Revelation or vision
4d is provable


