#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 575 of 1
It's ok, not everyone can think of √2 could be represented on a number line.
Humans didn't exist 13,8 billion years ago
How do you know that 😄
We don't have a photo of pyramids from 5000 years ago, maybe the British built them out of boredom 100 years ago
Oh i understand you were here like 13,8 bilions of years before and look for the humans am i right ?
No one was
In which grade are you studying?
Not photo but, you can listen to the echo of the big bang through a radio, but it has to be an analog radio
I'm doing this because a while ago someone asked if I had a video of God performing miracles.
you can hear the sound of universe
I know 😄
in universe there is some plants creating big bang like explode
I believe in all this
Your video didn't contain miracles, it was just women praying
so scientists collect this,(big bang theory)
god? do you see that
The woman sees a miracle 🤦♂️
Do we believe what someone sees if others can't see it as well? It could be schizophrenia
sscience always tell you the evidence , religions always tell you fuck the god
Emperor Constantin met, spoke to and held the hands of Apollo at his oracle
I think science and God are like two pieces of the same puzzle — they don’t cancel each other, they complete each other.
Thats all
If we take this at face value then the God Apollo is real
When you turn on the radio or you see noise on an old TV when it not setup on any channel, what do you think it is?you see big bang trace
how to get rid of a fever
Yeah, I know about that cosmic background radiation — for me it’s fascinating how science explains it, but I also believe God is behind the creation itself.
Take paracetamol and ibuprofen if it gets bad
For me, science is like reading the book of nature, and God is the author
God is behind that noise on TV?
😹
once human acheive advanced space exploration
Yes
there is goddamn people still belive their god
I believe God is everywhere — even in the things science studies.
their mind and delusional never change
What if it’s actually the other way around, and thinking there’s no God is the real delusion?
My point remains unchanged
"The idea that it could be God becomes a compelling possibility"
do religions teach you how to use medical things, do religons teach you how is nature form, do religons teach you how oceans is salty , do relgions educate you how semen come through female body
science explains how things work, faith explains why life matters.
Still, it being an infinite loop is more probable
interesting idea, but even an infinite loop still doesn’t explain the ultimate why behind existence.
Yes, it doesn't
So far it's more likely that it will be finite unless we find out more evidence
we do have faith, not religions faith
There will be nothing but heat death
I don't think it's possible to find more evidence
It's just an opinion of someone who's not an expert*
Why not, we keep discovering new possibilities
Even believing only in science is still a kind of faith — we all put our trust somewhere.
We will never find a definitive answer but that goes for plenty of things
It's not really faith when it comes to science because you can replicate plenty of experiments
Sure, science proves the how, but even trusting science starts with faith in reason and order.
Could be a name of a guy
Whas happenin here?
It's not faith, it's about transparency and being able to understand how science itself works
Science is blind
I agree, but even science assumes our minds can truly grasp reality — and that assumption itself is faith at the core.
Faith Leads science
True
We can grasp reality, just not fully because the senses are limited
Tell me what caused big bang

Right, and that’s where faith takes over — beyond the limits of our senses.
No, it's just a different approach and why the two aren't and never were compatible
Faith takes over but doesn't replace science just as science doesn't replace faith
They are different approaches, yes but different doesn’t have to mean incompatible. I see them as two perspectives on the same reality.
Yes, that’s the balance I believe in.
Yes, we came to the same conclusion
God bless you and keep you safe
Likewise
The underlying principles of the scientific method, from an atheistic worldview, are based on blind faith.
If everything is the product of chance, or if you simply don’t know, you can’t say with certainty that even the universal constants (including physical laws) are unchanging, since you either don’t know or you assume everything changes because it is simply the product of chance.
In this case, if atheists observe a spacecraft failing after launch and falling, they have no grounding for assuming it was an issue with the spacecraft’s design rather than a change in the physical laws.
Note: this doesn’t mean they wouldn’t deduce it’s a design problem rather than a change in physical laws, but every time they make that deduction, they are violating their own lack of belief (atheism).
That of course by extension means science as whole would be blind faith from an atheistic worldview.
It's not, they are the complete opposite. Two of its main principles are transparency and falsifiability, scientists provide the factors and the results of their experiments and findings for anyone to replicate, if they didn't that would be blind faith
Ordered a kebabpizza in support of immigration
An Arab will make it and a Bengali will deliver it, God bless Sweden 🙏🏻🇸🇪
hey guyss
hi, guys
the only reason you falling into the same trap was because you believe a crap that was created before few hundred years ago
I'm sorry believe something doesn't equal to have belief
you can believe in science that doesn't require you to have such a belief on science
you believe in science at most times just because it could work and it's verifiable
your allah is a piece of crap that doesn't exist neither most people give a fuck about it
Scientific theories can be proved.
There are even video evidences available now of space activities/bodies with Hubble telescope and James webb telescope.
There's yet to be any concrete proof of god or any video evidence.
and somebody keep their struggle then got crack down for obvious reason
because they keep believing the fucking crap to tell people either to believe their crap or they will use terrorist attack
that's why we will absolulely win the war against terror because we know how they were treating the rest majority of people
LONG LIVE THE WAR ON TERROR 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇨🇳 🇷🇺 🇬🇧 🇫🇷
i disagree
the advanced telescope , which you cann see the universe which is very expensive tho
i have seen a youtube video
Subscribe to watch more Astronomical videos!
Camera I use: https://amzn.to/3LtCitN
Lens I use: https://amzn.to/3R5o1XF
Telescope I currently use: https://amzn.to/3Vg8IO1
Telescope I use for Fun: https://store.seestar.com/DAMON
0:00 Intro
0:25 The Cheapest Telescope Ever?
2:48 The Biggest Telescope for under $100
4:20 Are these better??
5:59 Wh...
the guy with blind faith fucked these guy's ass who have the stupid faith to commit on a stupid backward ass ideology
don't worry natural selection is working, you can not to believe it, nobody cares
but it works 🇮🇱
and it worked perfectly well 🇮🇱
What a bunch of gibberish
Well, equations won't help us to calculate things in negative time, and given that the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light, it's unlikely to retrieve information from the distant past

I might be completely wrong
nobody think it's possible to know what's on the moon before 500 years ago
no any fucking ant on the ground is possible to know when they will be killed by a random guy stepping them on
using fucking ignorance and stupid to prove something does exist was the most stupidest thing ever to be completed
in the ancient times at the fucking least they could use this to mobilize people and create some degree of order for authority to achieve certain things
now it is the fucking 21 century, the fucking 21 century, the 21 century
and they still using it to misguide people to work for their shit and no doubt they lose it
but anyway I ain't surprised most people from the 3rd world empty ground places would believe in such a crap since we already dominated them for so long
make sense they stay at their fucking ground and make it more empty by themselves
3rd world empty ground but their stuff are cheap
cheap = low productivity with less economic output and low demand
dude
cheap means you are fucked
I mean generally if it's cheap, not relatively cheap
That's a UAV
They just copied the Sentinel drone
?
yeah it is better if we colonize them
That's a UAV
and exploit their recourse
we have a lot of choices to deal with them
already doing that for almost a decade
we are the only state that is directly extracting other's resources in 21th century
for America they are just buying free piece of crap with their money printing machine
Xian H-20
we are obviously taking huge advantage over it don't worry too much
That's not the H-20💀💀💀💀💀
How does a Chinese know less about China military than me
he's from Hong Kong that make sense
somebody from Hong Kong says it is the end of the world when our aircraft carrier visited that place
let them learn mandrain instead of english
even people from Taiwan are getting used to it
H - 20
unnecessary, why don't we just keep them more illterate
and send our people to that place
actually most of the African leaders would send their kids to Chinese school
yeah
there is only three counties that have Stealth Bombers
other ass counties does not built one
Clearly the engines at the back are different 2 vs 1 maybe?
great
let their god to built their stealth bombers

That looks like the one on the right is a smaller unmanned version
A UAV vs stealth bomber
Left is the H-20, which is manned, right is the new UAV, CH-7
Lilil give me your social credits
Yeah looks right
You have brought great shame upon the CCP
military flag of china
Flag of the People's Liberation Army
Ahh okay 
do you guys have advacned war weapons?
pray your god, maybe your country got these weapons
Is that a little anus
I wonder if a Finnish person with epicanthic eye fold and Chinese naturalisation can easily join the CCP
Assuming they speak Chinese without a foreign accent
Very scary
That’s not the same as either, those are jet fighters
1 EMP vs Chinas military might who wins
The capitalists
Does China not have protocols against EMP?
Hello beautiful people
you forgot there's one country called
🇺🇸 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
You ruined my day

Everyone does, it's just not on par with the US
"In Africa if we find you introducing a man to another man ma ma"😂😂
for sure
Blocked. Because useless thing
I'm like in Groundhog Day, the same person says the same thing over and over.
Discuss
Discuss what, name of the viruse? Name is good
It's not the Chinese or Russians
That's literally me I'm so nice and innocent
Ik
Is def the Russians

looks not so delicious but sure we can cook that
This is weird
@fresh flower Your bu is acting up again
Who are u ?
I don't know
Okey sorry
Thank you
What
Ntg u || broke my heart ||
Hey henryyyy
I'm sad my life and I sucks
Nothing
I can't change my life
I'm tired of everything
Fucking gobernmenr
Fucking all
No don’t say that
Fucking me , fucking all
Life is hard but u can’t give up
Idk what’s your problem in life but whatever it is I mean u can be sad and be tired but u can’t never lose hope
The worst part is the next years are gonna horrible
Why
Why so negative
U have to be positive
The reset bro, the new global economy, low and middle class are gonna desapire
We will be slaves used as a labor
It's already starting in my country, the companies are going away and there is less jobs to apply for
Why where are u from ?
How can I break your heart
Very soon the politicians will rule over the country and we will give us up to them for a kilogram of sugar .
Don't bother he is a racist
Where are u from?
I'm from latam
It wad suposed to grow , it had it all to develop
Racist? Why
But no , the fuckinnng left
Me ?
Wtf I'm not a racist
I'm against Islamism
That's very diferent
Bruh don’t give up u can build a garden in a desert
Nothing is impossible
Why Your country destroyed because oh Islam?
And he just revealed himself😂😂
No, don't mix it all
Plus how did I break your heart
Latin America is mainly Catholic.
Not in my countrt
U misunderstood me
It's 75% laic
So if you are Catholic you must hate on other religions
No, Catholicism is a relatively secular religion in my opinion.
Basically atheist
Or


What
Because their teachings have been modified over time
Yeah I am lost
Bro still
I was joking I didn't know all this would happen
At least u break my heart
How can someones heart be broken btw like it is not made up of glass or like breakable material I wonder who came up with this
It’s actually heart will break
It is a muscle thought how can it break it is not a bone maybe if you said I ripped your heart to shreds it makes sense but break
Nah I it happened to me 4 time and 2 of them I couldn’t breathe
I didn't even trigger any of those feelings
I did
Damn it was so bad 😭
What happened
Heart breaking
Everything ok?
I could think of plenty of other things that is worse than this
No
Who broke it?? And which tool did they use
Trust me nothing is worse like breaking heart
My heart every times will break when I think about || my brothers dead ||
what?
How cold he!
What?
Who?😭
I see
I thought you said something about a family member doing this. Did I misunderstand?
|| no I mean I lost 2 brothers of mine because of sickness ||
Uhm
Yeah
Well I am glad I didn't break any hearts
Oh! I’m sorry that happened.
Thanks it’s along time ago so
Sorry
Thanks
This is indeed a bit sad
Uhm
stolen fr
Noooo
Hello
Did you watch the barca game
Hey akeny
Ello
Marhaba
Or
Ntg bored
Shrimp guy
Come to #🫂|beginner-chat
Ke
Barca got dog walked😂😂😂
How can invest kind sir
Just one game
Levante remember them
One season wonder it is over for barca
Look and learn and listen
We will do rimondata
Dude don't you get it every team now knows how to play barca
Let them 😏
We just lost one game
Bro you can see raphinia losing form yamal flopping and that high line is going to absolutely cooked by Chelsea,PSG and Madrid
Basically barca is going to flop this season
Madrid?
We have this man
Indeed have you seen how they play this season
Yes they need hansi
You are not understanding me levante cooked that high line raya also cooked them, imagine Xavi team now and PSGs rapid attackers and Chelseas long ball
Ik they couldn’t buy any good players this summer

I hope they get better my Barcelona can’t lose
Hansi might be sacked this season because he refuses to drop that high line which every team now knows how to exploit
I heard hansi said he will leave if it’s go on like that
Is it right?
I heard that lamine and some of them talking against hansi
I feel bad for you mbappes and vini will have a field day with this highline
Who vini?
I heard that he will leave
I don't think so it is just some of the barca players are developing a lot of ego and he just talked about that nothing else
I don't think he is leaving
Especially lamine I think he will destroy himself like Neymar
Madrid takes every trophy this season
If he ends up ruining himself it is because of you guys
Me why
Why meeeee
Ain't no party like a lamine party
Barca fans
Why
You guys glazed him so much now he thinks he is at the level of Ronaldo and messi
Do you know what it meant
Yes kiss

U watch football with Arabic commentary?
No I meant this statement "ain't no party like a lamine party" do you know what it means
No
No what’s that
Mean
Damn howwwww then u never got excited to watch football
We use to have peter Dury dude was a poet
Arabic commentary making me cry💔
Go search up peter Dury
You are too innocent
The meeting is in China and the funeral is at the White House
U saw trump too with Europian countries?💀
Ik tell me
Messi it's the goat
Iraq?
Azerbaijan’s leader
Aaaaaa
Ik he’s
Names all of these people
I only know xi and putin and baby kim

Xi really stand out in that position
Left is kim, right is putin, “big three “
It’s a message for trump 
Meanwhile trump was watching live stream

He had a meeting with some Europian countries too I guess

I wonder how tall is putin and baby kim

They can destroy your country just by one bomb
that means their one bomb can destory the whole middle east
Yes not gonna lie

Lukashenko on the right from Belarus
yeah
Let me break it down even further.
-
deduction and induction: which is based on a mind that you can't rely on if you believe it was accidentally formed for survival, not necessarily with the intention to reflect reality.
-
axioms (such as causality): which are indisputable necessities taken as presuppositions and are self-evident, you can only rely on them if you believe they came to be intentionally, otherwise, they are accidental and therefore not reliable or trustworthy.
-
cumulative knowledge: which is our ability to rely on past knowledge put forth by previous scientists and can be replicated to yield the same results. This is only meaningful if the universe is intentional, otherwise, we don't know or it's just chance-based, either ways laws of physics would be unreliable and unpredictable.
-
observation: which is actually the only source left in an atheistic world, but sadly, brute facts are nothing without all of the previous principles, so observation alone cannot produce knowledge.
These are even deeper sources of science than transparency and falsifiability, and they easily collapse in an atheistic worldview.
It's inherently incoherent.
Cry me a river.
Capitalists
Trump is pissed that, he was not invited by china
Hello @scenic idol
Or laugh at you?
americans did help us a a lot during ww2, we appreciate that
Oh boy! Look at this slowpoke.
Have you never deduce anything on your own? Or your mind is so much programmed and controlled by someone else?
Axioms are self evident true statements, because they demand chain of definitions for a general truth that can be understood with common sense. It was a tiring process to attach a chain of definitions just to understand 'a point is something that has no part'
So the mathematicians collectively agreed upon ditching the tiring process.
Axioms are reliable, reliable more than someone like you.someone like you who would ask an atom its religion if could get a chance lol
Do you really think cumulative knowledge and observations(observations are part of induction by the way) could be so wrong that it nullifies reality? You wouldn't be having internet, smartphones, astronauts, man-made objects across solar system, gps, satellites roaming around the earth etc
Do you know how much precision it needs to land on the moon or mars?
If these all were unreliable, nothing would have happened.
This person literally questioned basis of scientific theories just to insert a religious non religious agenda.
Although anyone can perform so many science experiments at home and deduce a conclusion out of it.
Anyone, anywhere on earth can perform these scientific theories and check it for themselves. They are 'universally applicable'. They have to go through so many cross questioning and testing before getting approved.
But religious claims like 'split the moon in half and stick it back together', 'shooting stars are Allah attacking the jinns' can't be criticised or allowed to be cross checked? Allow some scientists to do some research and testing on black stone.
These slowpokes' brain retires the moment self-questioning surfaces
I ain't reading aladat
Should've add I'm happy for you tho at the end 😭
This guy stitched together a Frankenstein of half-digested philosophy, pseudo-history of math, and appeals to shiny technology. He confused axioms with evidence, science with math, and technological success with epistemic certainty
hi everyone im new member
Hello
He’s proud of his empty ground with his faith
I would say if you commit your faith on a piece of crap your life is done
Wasted
Hey
He rarely wore a Zhongshan suit in this case
Which was also wore by Mao Zedong in the past
And Deng Xiaoping
For Hu Jintao or Jiang Zemin these former Chinese leaders they used to wear suits as the other leaders in other countries do
He’s at the center it’s very fitting the tradition which we had such culture of treating people based on their status
Lmao
We should invite Trump
If I was the General Secretary I will invite Trump and other leaders in the West
There’s a lot of drama that is going to happen if they would meet together
When EU and US leaders meet Putin with Kim Jong Un
And Benjamin Netanyahu
🤣
*iq
150 🤓
*iq
70 🤓
*iq
149 🤓
I ain't reading aladdin
Zhongshan suits look so good so makes sense
instant drip
*iq
131 🤓
*iq
83 🤓
Hell
@vestal heron are you a fundamentalist?
I'm not surprised 
@slender coral *iq
Make urs
Let me see it
Link 
*iq
70 🤓
70 🤓

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*iq
143 🤓
*iq
149 🤓
Minecraft is definitely below 30
I disagree
So smort
Ultra smort
thats only 1% of my power
??
Well at least you worked hard till the end
*iq
51 🤓
111 🤓
😂😂😂
111 🤓
124 🤓
145 🤓
145 🤓
94 🤓
150 🤓
*IQ @main bison
150 🤓
@thorny steeple from Israelies
But Hamas warriors are Palestinians from father to son
Lol
I'm sure uk that the netan is polish
Most of Israelies are from England and Europe 
I'm from middle east
Lol
Even Europeans hate u weird creatures
Who was expecting that hahahah
That was funny ngl
Yeah yeah right
I forgot that middle east promised for y'all 3000 yo ago
Damn these ppl are dumbass
Go to Gaza see how IDF got dealed there

Without ur jets , the IDF would be buried in Gaza not the civilians they target
So do you think it's the best way to wage war by kidnapping citizens who are Israelites but also who are foreigners?
So do u think it is the best way to get Palestinians jailed without any reason or any rights there and they keeping barking Abt human rights !!
Did someone copy my free Israel joke, it wasn't intended to support Israel btw at least copy it properly
I didn't say I support that view. But I'm asking you, is it the best way to wage the war by kidnapping civilians or forefinger who just went there for the vacations? 🤔
That's a mistake.
- Kidnapping Israelites.. inviting them fight with you..
- Kidnapping American citizens, Indians, Nepalese, Mexican etc and etc..
So inviting them to wage a war with you?
That just putting yourself in more trouble.. now you have made more enemies

It's sad that the israel vs palestine thing is even a "debate" .
Sure, it's been in a debate for centuries
Do u all think that amarican throw nuclear bomb in japan is just self defense not terrorism ?
It wasn't either of these
Then it was what ?
Their sole purpose that they are more powerful so not to mess with them
Have Japan surrender as soon as possible
But that cause to over than 100k innocent ppl to die

People are mad for the powers and fame.. look at hungry gold diggers
That's al politics of sins

But that doesn’t clear their guilty of killing over than 100k innocent ppl
Who said it did
Yea they’re just foolish they just care about what does the world see them
Alot of magazines u can just google it
Those magazines are funded by zio jews tho
So the nuclear bomb didn’t kill anybody ?
It did but what i am saying is , the Americans don't hold the view that it was a good thing to drop the bomb , atleast the current generation.
But they did it twice and a lot of ppl r still surviving from that
If they just did it once i might could explain it but twice is insane
You can't blame people for what the government did is the point , most Americans "Today" are against it
Maybe back then they were being fed propaganda
Just like we have today
Majority of people with a brain agree that in today's world we all have a common enemy which is the zio jews. And i advocate for uniting against them
This person is asking weird questions
I don't think you can do anything to them
Hi everbody
Hello can anyone help me learning fluent English
LMFAO! Your response was so ass that someone else cut to the core of it with a single line message.
Shout out to @plush robin ! ✨
Science could never evaluate this drama of flake beings 🥀
It doesn’t have to since it’s proven that whoever don’t believe or would blindly follow something on the fictional book under the sake of god or allah will take disadvantage against natural selection
All we need is time, time will purify all of these fucking crap
Don’t worry
Yess pleasee 
Our friend Israel is accelerating the process 🇮🇱
Tell putin to make the flag red again !!
How so?
By committing a genocide against innocent civilians.
I could help. Where are you from
Exactly, but knuckleheads and cracked ppl who support israel could never understand it
Who?
Remember to drink water and pee guys

But why islam
أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا۟ فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ فَتَكُونَ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌۭ يَعْقِلُونَ بِهَآ أَوْ ءَاذَانٌۭ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا ۖ فَإِنَّهَا لَا تَعْمَى ٱلْأَبْصَـٰرُ وَلَـٰكِن تَعْمَى ٱلْقُلُوبُ ٱلَّتِى فِى ٱلصُّدُورِ ٤٦
Have they not travelled throughout the land so their hearts may reason, and their ears may listen? Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind.

“He claimed “
That’s what anti Islamic say
Good keep searching
Allāhumma ṣalli ʿalā Muḥammad wa ʿalā āli Muḥammad, kamā ṣallayta ʿalā Ibrāhīma wa ʿalā āli Ibrāhīm, innaka Ḥamīdu-m-Majīd, Allāhumma bārik ʿalā Muḥammad, wa ʿalā āli Muḥammad, kamā bārakta ʿalā Ibrāhīma wa ʿalā āli Ibrāhīm, innaka Ḥamīdu-m-Majīd.
well refuted tho
Muhammad was not a good guy
You shouldn't follow him, he lied 2 billions people.
Allāhumma ṣalli ʿalā Muḥammad wa ʿalā āli Muḥammad, kamā ṣallayta ʿalā Ibrāhīma wa ʿalā āli Ibrāhīm, innaka Ḥamīdu-m-Majīd, Allāhumma bārik ʿalā Muḥammad, wa ʿalā āli Muḥammad, kamā bārakta ʿalā Ibrāhīma wa ʿalā āli Ibrāhīm, innaka Ḥamīdu-m-Majīd.

You seem really angry 
Me no I’m drinking my cola with baklava rn

And I have never been that happy 

The amount of Islamophobia and deception present in a single blog post is truly unprecedented.
Also, "the doctrine of the Trinity" emerged only in the 4th century AD, that's 400 years apart from Jesus. I wonder what Christians used to believe before Council of Nicaea and Church fathers developed and established such an incoherent concept.
Try to refute any of the things from the blog
Which church father after the 4th century created teh trinity?
It's a big fat blog worth of Islamophobia and deception. I'd probably need to write books to deal with all of that. So, nah.
4th century stuff is also refuted in the same blog, if you go to NEw Testament qa
Well, i wrote that within a month
I didnt took a lot for me to write it
Hello everyone
none of the things are false dude, check the sources
关于要打多久,我们现在不能下决定,也就是他们要打多久就打多久,一直打到完全胜利。
Regarding to issue of how much time we are going to fight, we can't have a conclusion right now, that means if they are going to fight, we will continue to fight, until we achieve complete victory - Mao Zedong
**LONG LIVE THE WAR ON TERROR 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇨🇳 🇷🇺 🇬🇧 🇫🇷 **
Tertullian, Athanasius, and Augustine to name a few.
I guess Tertullian was the first to put the term "Trinity". Fun fact, some of his teachings were later rejected by the Church.
I'll read it when I have the time, InShaAllah.
You can write something in one minute that requires walls of text to refute.
my greatest way of refute was the F-35 on the sky and IDF soldiers eliminating every terrorist who had some stupid ideal
Lol. You realize you're talking to a Muslim, right? We've dealt with your "sources" countless times.
In fact, there isn't a single claim made by non-Muslims against Islam that hasn't been rigorously refuted decades ago. I don't have to deal with recycled garbage. It's a waste of time and energy.
YEAAAAAAH
SHE ALREADY MENTIONED THE WHOLE TERROR COUNTRIES
Lol
Sure
Did you know what kinda refutations that they try to show?
Sources like this and that scholar said so.. actually that's not what you see in the quran neither in hadiths.
So a scholar said so hence it would be that way when the quran is not even addressing what scholar is saying, in fact it's contradicting the main sources
That kinda refution they present,, sometimes they dont even present any sources, they just move on from it .. they say im not that knowledgeable.. dude, it's the time to gain knowledge about
But if i got to the guy who knows something.. he says well this and that scholar said xyz so im refuted..
Eeh.. so refuation is the scholar when he says something not really alinged with the mainline sources? Tha'ts not refuation
that's still a prblem
For example.. about the preservation of the quran,.. we know 5 sucklings verse is missing from the quran the witness is Asiah the wife of muhammad. But if you got scholars who came way after him presented no soruces where they got that from.. like Al Nawawi came in 13th century.. he said well aha that's actully abrogated in reciation but not ruling.. but buddy where did you get that from? WHat's the chain of your claim,, which hadith are you quoting? No sources, trust me bro. THat's not a reufation.
Hence we can say the quran has verses missing
That contrdicts surah 15.9 btw
And that makes isalm totally false, i dont have to go to far
Walls of text???
Nobody said Trinity suddenly emerged in the 4th century, that's a strawman. The concept of the Trinity was definitely a work in progress before the 4th century. However, apart from the fact that all of your patristic evidence cited are people at least 50-100 years after Jesus, some of them don't even mention worshiping Jesus or that the father, the son, and the holy spirit are co-equal co-eternal etc...
Not to mention the existence of opposing beliefs even in the 1st century and probably prior such as Ebionites, who denied the divinity of Jesus while establishing his prophethood and Messiahship.
That's nothing wrong with that, if they are 50 years after jesus.. well, then they are very much learned and familiar with the christians before them.
Unlike early Christians, we as Muslims don't attribute divine authority (acting in God's name) to scholars, we don't have priests.
So, your statement is outright false. Even if a scholar contradict Qur'an or Sunnah in one of his teachings or opinions, they are instantly rejected by Muslims and other Islamic scholars, not to mention the amount of scholarly criticism and refutation those opinions would receive.
That's a very miniority group.. they also denied the virgin birth,, now dont play the game that they were muslims 
Well, then those arguments cant be refuted
Plus they beleived jesus died on the cross
in fact there were types of ebionites
there were not just one type of
but there were almost 3-4 types of them
How can I confirm someone's reliability and trustworthiness if he's years apart from Jesus and speaking about his teachings? In Islamic science of Hadith this is called Munqati' (disconnected), which is one type of Da'eef (weak) degrees of sources.
In case you don't know, Da'eef means rejected and unreliable, i.e., not considered part of the Islamic doctrine or teachings.
most of them were coming from the 2nd century
The very much early source would be disciples of aposltes and their writings
If you dont take them.. you can take the sources of Paul, he would be the most early source, because he personally met aposltes
Never said they are. Though opposition existed even at the time some Christians were attempting to develop the doctrine of the Trinity to reconcile the divinity of Jesus with the partially monotheistic aspect of Judaism.
putting aside gospels... let's just go through the early sources
the writings of paul
Sure, everybody probably did. Qur'an says it was made to appear so. So, we pretty much expect most if not all of them to believe he was crucified, so there isn't any gutcha here.
Again Ebionities made distinction between christ and Jesus
They say christ left Jesus to die alone
So, christ is diferent perosn than jesus
where in islam jesus i the christ..
You mean like Irenaeus of Lyons who claimed to be the disciple of Polycarp and also claimed that Polycarp was the disciple of John? That's not how it works, bud.
We can verify Peter, that he said Paul's letters are scripture, plus the books of acts, Luke wrote that Paul met disciples of jesus and they together preached
So there is no way it's a mere claim of Paul
Plus we know when he died
So obs you can see that he met the disiples
Jesus is king
Should we? 😔
Yeah
We shouldn't hate nobody, this what Jesus our God teaches us
Idk, that sounds weird, I think you can make that an exception
You mean Paul the apostle? Yeah, he is the father of modern-day Christianity, most Christians are probably following Paul not Jesus, that's because Paul literally said the main source of his writings are visions and "revelations".
Do you know where would that place him if he would to be a Hadith narrator? He would either be Kadhdhāb (liar), Munkar al-ḥadīth (Rejected in hadith), Mukhtaliṭ (delusional), or even Matrūk (abandoned). He literally disagreed with some of Jesus' direct disciples according to Christians, e.g., James and Peter.
Why would you think he holds any authority at all? One cannot get any more deviated than that.
Again, I've never said they are right or that they hold same beliefs about Jesus as Muslims, but the fact there wasn't a consensus on the Trinity even in the 1st century AD implies that it's a made up concept.
Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing" (Luke 23:34). It's forgiveness
<34> And Jesus said," Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do." And they cast lots to divide his garments.
Luke 14:26
<26>" If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.
Religion at its finest
Well it starts with education every revolution starts with making people aware first , majority are unaware
In order to be a disciple, we must be willing to give up everything for Jesus. Following Jesus requires commitment and faithfulness, even if our parents choose not to follow the Lord. If and when we are faced with the painful choice of loyalty to family versus loyalty to Jesus, we must choose Jesus. Even if our family members disown us—or worse—for being Christians, we must follow Christ. It is in this sense that we are “hating” our family. Jesus’ command to “hate father and mother” requires us to prioritize our relationship with Jesus over our relationship with parents, siblings, and other family members. https://www.gotquestions.org/hate-father-mother.html
for the record Christians believe that 'hate' here isn’t meant in the emotional or hostile sense, , it conveyed priority and allegiance
If verses had truly been lost, the Companions would have immediately noticed and never accepted it. The fact that there was no uprising and that the Qur’an has been unanimously transmitted shows that this was not a loss but abrogation a divinely intended removal. Therefore, Surah 15:9 stands: the Qur’an is complete and preserved. Remember, there were the Ridda Wars simply because some refused to pay Zakah after the Prophet ﷺ passed away, claiming it was only due to him. If such wars arose over Zakah, imagine what would have happened if entire verses of the Qur’an had actually disappeared.
lol I still doubt hate was used that way but sure
This christian vs muslim debate is useless now tbh , we have way bigger problems to solve , we have a common enemy , we should be uniting instead
well atleast we can say God is narcissistic
Yup, he’s perfectly moral but also has a huge ego, therefore he’s either not perfectly moral or being a narcissist is what everyone should strive to be
What are these common enemy ?
Zio jews
Zio 💀
Well, they shouldn't support them, at least.
Christians usually attack Muslims who primarily believe in Jesus and hold him in high regards than those who literally call him demon-possessed and blasphemer, not to mention humiliating and killing him, and some sources even mention being spat on by them.
And Evangelical Christians even take it to the next level (zio-Christians).
Even zio christians are creation of zio jews through brainwashing and scoffield bible
So it all tracks back to zio jews if you wanna go down the rabbit hole
Nah it was just that Christians were antisemitic and wanted to get Jews away from them and to the desert, so they created Christian Zionism
Brainwashing though💀
Crazy
Lol. That's probably the most correct thing I hear today.
By what source do you say we are merely following Paul but not Jesus ?
I think we have to make a distinction here
- There are Christians who support it coz it will speed up the process of the return of christ ( which is dumb)
- The things I said about the scoffield bible and brainwashing
Look up scoffield bible
Paul didn't disagree with them.. so are you now saying Paul met them?
Well yeah, 1 is dumb, 2 is a conspiracy theory not actually based on reality, that actually plays on the classic “Jewish financier” tropes
He's also an evil troll
True
How do you prove those people are coming from the first century?
Where I cited the gospels, letters of Paul which are coming from the 1st century
Don't get me wrong but you pfp looks like POV gay corn
Ok that’s devastating
Not so, the Trinity is very much seen in the gospels and the letters of Paul
I lied, it looks great lol
Ok lmao
Conspiracy theory how ? Lol it has literally been proven look it up . The non zio Christians have admitted that, people like andrew wilson have confirmed it
I looked it up and it says it’s not true, so maybe let’s see what source material you have
Actually they did.. such as Aisha. Aisha says that verse was revealed in the quran. Infact after the death of Muhammad Muslims were arguing on whose quran is right and whose wrong.. because they had different different numbers of chapters in the Koran. Ibn Masood had 112 surahs.. ubay had 116 surahs.. and uthamnic standardised quran we see has 114 surahs. Plus from uthamnic quran if we see today that verse is clearly missing.
Has nothing to do with Christianity. Keep this propaganda with yourself 
Lemme guess kosher sources ? Lol
lol you’re not so slick bud.
There is no supporting verses that it says we gotta support Judaism for coming of the christ.. can I see those verses?
u guys are still arguing with the Witcher
Seriel killer 🙃
Yes?
Maritini has blocked me cause last time he wasn't able to breathe 😔
Are you actually in Murder and in execution?
أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا۟ فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ فَتَكُونَ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌۭ يَعْقِلُونَ بِهَآ أَوْ ءَاذَانٌۭ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا ۖ فَإِنَّهَا لَا تَعْمَى ٱلْأَبْصَـٰرُ وَلَـٰكِن تَعْمَى ٱلْقُلُوبُ ٱلَّتِى فِى ٱلصُّدُورِ ٤٦
Have they not travelled throughout the land so their hearts may reason, and their ears may listen? Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind.
nah dude they had different personal collections because some of them included supplications that they treated as surahs, but in the end under Uthman all of them accepted this version of Quran und there werent any revolt or something
Yeah he's blind ik
ure blind we know
So you are saying they were wrong about the numbers of surahs in the Quran? And suddenly uthaman came in and standardised a new Koran and burned the all copies? 
Plus those two people I cited were early reciters and have been told by Muhammad that they are the best of the reciters
By Paul himself. In 2 Corinthians 12:1-10 he claims that he is literally receiving visions and revelations from the Lord. So, if you believe in his writings, you're basically taking his word for it with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
<1> I must boast; there is nothing to be gained by it, but I will go on to visions and revelations of the Lord. <2> I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows. <3> And I know that this man was caught up into Paradise—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows— <4> and he heard things that cannot be told, which man may not utter. <5> On behalf of this man I will boast, but on my own behalf I will not boast, except of my weaknesses. <6> Though if I wish to boast, I shall not be a fool, for I shall be speaking the truth. But I refrain from it, so that no one may think more of me than he sees in me or hears from me. <7> And to keep me from being too elated by the abundance of revelations, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan, to harass me, to keep me from being too elated. <8> Three times I besought the Lord about this, that it should leave me; <9> but he said to me," My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." I will all the more gladly boast of my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. <10> For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities; for when I am weak, then I am strong.
It seems early Muslims were confused and Muhammad didn't tell them how many surahs are supposed to be in the Koran
Isn’t that what every religious figure does though? I mean, none of the other prophets had any evidence either
There is nothing wrong for Paul to receive the revelations.. if you mean recieving a revelation is unreliable then islam is false cause the entire quran is supposed to be the revelation
oh leally?
Bilibili
2026
the differebces you mention werent about believing in a different Quran. Ibn masud didnt list al Fatiha and the last two surahs as separate headings, but he recited them in prayer. Ubayy included two personal supplications and wrote them with surah titles. so the content was the same these differences were in notation not in revelation
yeah?
Nothing it’s just fun to say
and the caliph uthman didnt invent a new Quran. He standardized the existing text to prevent confusion from dialect and personal notes. The major of companions including ibn masud and ubayy accepted his
how to talk to american?
It's a different Quran.. when the later quran has verses and surah missing. Or it adds.. and few times later it adds or removes.. that's called corruption. How many surahs supposed to be in the Qur'an?
112/ 114 / 116?
crazy
Oo so earlier than him people had 112 and 116 surahs he suddenly came with 114 surahs and he forced Muslims from Basra to get the copy and guess what...he burned them.. this is how he made his own quran
In fact he used his power to since he wa a Caliph and you know what's the punishment for not obeying the caliph
It was Ubay of Masood influenced his followers to hide the copy and go give it to Uthman
Paul taught the Jews to abolish practicing the law while the disciples are telling him why are you doing that.
Abolishing the law is basically against Jesus's teachings in the bible. He said he came to fulfill not to abolish, and the disciples preached that laws are still binding and practiced them.
That's one example of how Paul is literally making up his own religion which Christians of today follow.
I'm not saying anything about him meeting the disciples. I'm using your own sources to prove Paul is neither authoritative nor credible.
i explained it to you... the Quran has always 114 surahs, under uthman they burned added things like from dialect or personal notes to have a standard quran which all companions accepted.
do you really think the same companions who fought the persian and roman empires at the same time, were somehow afraid to oppose Uthman if he had changed the Quran?
I don't have to prove anything, your sources are the ones claiming it. Irenaeus for instance mentioned them in 180 AD as being Jewish Christians who rejected Paul.
Paul didn't say don't follow the law. Paul was just saying the law doesn't justify a person to be a righteous. In order to support it.. he quotes Genesis.. Abraham believed in God and he was credited as righteous. It's not a new invention but it's literllay the torah.
Oo always had? So if the Quran had always 114 Surah...were his close disciples confused about the numbers of Surahs?
It was in the time of Irenaeus.. since those people we notice appeared in the 2nd century. No 1st centurion mentions Ebonites appearing at the first century
No apostles writings or any other writings or historian mentions that Ebonites appeared at the first century
@turbid ivy can i ask you about consistent standard? If texutal variants and multiple canons are a problem how is that resolved in your own tradition? Lets apply the same standard to both and compare fairly
Im actually using the standard of Allah surah 15.9
It seems he failed to preserve his word. This makes islam false. Because by own criteria, it's falling to keep the promise.
It seems we have now established that Islam can't be true in any way because not preservation of the Quran and making a false promise are the relevant evidence for it.

I already proved Paul isn't very much a reliable source, and the Trinity in the gospels is an interpretation, there isn't a single mention of the Trinity in either of the canonical gospels (Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew). There are only footnotes added by translators.
In fact, we've got verses in the bible that directly contradict the concept of the Trinity, like Jesus saying the father is greater than him in John 14:28 for example, which means they are not co-equal as preached, or claiming that the father is the only TRUE God in John 17:3, which means neither the son nor the holy spirit are God.
You can only rely on obscure verses and interpret them in non-obvious ways to bring the Trinity. That's like twisting some text to fit your agenda.
But in Christianity we don't have such promises like word for Word. The Christian message is preserved either by the written documents or by oral Teachings.
nah you have to choose the standard:
-
if you accept preservation despite canon differences and variants in your own tradition, then calling the Quran "corrupt" despite an unifield 114-surah canon and mass memorization is inconsitent.
-
if your standard demands verbatim uniformity from the start, then be consistent and explain which christian canon meets it, and why acknowledged cariant dont violate it.
oh thats crazy
if christiantiy doent even claim word for word preservation and you still accept it as preserved in message, then its inconsistent to reject islam, which does claim and demonstrate exact wording through 114 surahs, mass memorization and early manuscripts. Demanding perfection from islam while accepting less for your own tradition is a double standard
I don't think Paul is considered a prophet, but even if we assume he is, other prophets come with miracles and prophecies to back up and prove their claims.
We've rejected countless self-proclaimed prophets, why would we do that if we are just following whoever pop ups with baseless prophethood claims.
Prophet Muhammad PBUH for instance brought prophecies that are time-bound, people-bound etc... that are not generic, and later accurately fulfilled as prophesied.
So getting a revelation makes not reliable? By your own standard Mohamamd is not reliable. Is there any word in the quran that mentioned as Tawhid?
The word doesnt matter, the matter is the concept. There is pretty good reasons to say that was not added by schoalrs. I have refuted that argument as well. Oh but Jesus also says I and the father are one,, or if you have seen me seen the father, the father is in me and i in the father, before abraham was i am..
So defi that claims to be God.
Ah, this discussion wasted enough of my time. I'm disengaging.
THere is nothing as not preserved in christianity unless like quran, verse missing
What's your denomination?
It doesnt have to .. cause the message is cleary preserved.
im using your own critera to critic your belief. it's not conistent with own critera
Reformed
What’s your race?
If the religion cannot be faithful itself.. then way it's not lying to you.. proving it's not honest, it lies.. and makes not trsutworthy
what religion r insinuating abt
@shell bison okay that’s true I did not know that about the poppy seeds
amma christian
ok soo which religion are u poinitng out here
Islam
It’s okay because you learn new things every day Alhamdulillah .
It seems you are a muslim 
what do u think is unfaithful about
I encourage you to study Afghan history .
come on witcher.. the longer ending of mark, John 7:53-8:11 the woman caught in adultery, 1 John 5:7 (the "comma Joanneum" about the trinity in late manuscripts) etc.
<53> They went each to his own house, <8:1> but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. <2> Early in the morning he came again to the temple; all the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them. <3> The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst <4> they said to him," Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. <5> Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such. What do you say about her?" <6> This they said to test him, that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. <7> And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them," Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her." <8> And once more he bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. <9> But when they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the eldest, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. <10> Jesus looked up and said to her," Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" <11> She said," No one, Lord." And Jesus said," Neither do I condemn you; go, and do not sin again."
<7> And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth.
Everthing, there is no truth in it.. for instance
https://apologetics-101.com/islam
I have alrady refuted all of them dude
https://apologetics-101.com/manuscript-difficulties
gimman an example
Yeah you’re right that he’s not a prophet, but he’s as close as can be.
What miracles and prophecies have been evidenced? And what specific prophecies were fulfilled?
Alhamdulilah, I love our country just don’t want it to go down the drain
The link i posted is full of examples but i will make a simple example.
When muhamad was caught commiting jinah with a slave girl that he was not married with. He promised his wives not to do that, but his wife again came back from al manasi and found him doing it, this time he made an excuse, he said i got a revelation from God, God made halal for me..

thats sooo wrong lol
God fulfilling the sexual desires.. we can clearly notice he was lying
the prophet never committed any type of adultery
It is being rebuilt after 20 years of war and bloodshed , we need to give it time and Tawakkal Allah .
In sha Allah the schools for women will also re open very soon .
Yes that's wrong, hence, that's one example how he commited such crimes, but instead of repenting he did it again and try to make it justify by using God's name.. he failed as husband and failed to repent.
tell me the exact surah
Is adultery having sexual intercourse of the marriage?
Indo aryan
having sexual relationships with someone who is not ur spouse is adultery
surah 66:1-5
Just read Tafsir al jalayan on it, you can also find that in Ibn kathir, but only in arabic version, in english translation they have removed it cause Ibn kathir is a popular well known scholar
Good now read sunan an nasai 3959
oki
Insha’Allah do you live there rn?
Yes I live in Kabul .
Ahh kheili zendegi ya Afghanistan
here as you can see now lets' read quran surah 66:1-5, it's found in the quran btw
i read it there was no mention of adultery it was just about all his wives
he didnt have any intercourse with someone other than his wives
Did you read the above hadith?
lemme check that too
He never married that woman, did you know what name she had?
Matlab tse dai ?
she did
she was married
to him
How many wives did he have?
Long life to Afghanistan
multiple
Did you know what name she had?
O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking the approval of your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Allah has already ordained for you [Muslims] the dissolution of your oaths. And Allah is your protector, and He is the Knowing, the Wise. And [remember] when the Prophet confided to one of his wives a statement; and when she informed [another] of it and Allah showed it to him, he made known part of it and ignored a part. And when he informed her about it, she said, “Who told you this?” He said, “I was informed by the Knowing, the Acquainted.” If you two [wives] repent to Allah, [it is best], for your hearts have deviated. But if you cooperate against him – then indeed Allah is his protector, and Gabriel and the righteous of the believers and the angels, moreover, are [his] assistants. Perhaps his Lord, if he divorced you [all], would substitute for him wives better than you – submitting [to Allah], believing, devoutly obedient, repentant, worshipping, and traveling – [ones] previously married and virgins.
O you who have believed, protect yourselves and your families from a Fire whose fuel is people and stones, over which are [appointed] angels, harsh and severe; they do not disobey Allah in what He commands them but do what they are commanded.
surah 66:1-6
Interesting is how he captured his wife safiya bint*
Captured?
it was allowed at the time, laws slowly were implied
🤔🤔🤔
first alcohol was allowed too
So he was not married to her?
they slowly started restraining everything
it was a halal relationship under islamic laws of the time
when did allah forbid to not to have intercourse with slaves?
there r many instances of christianity in this way too
Ooh so now you concead that he never married her but like a bf gf aka he was just sleeping with her?
later on, and his wives knew about the woman
it was not cheating
Killed her whole tribe, father, husband and made her have sex with him on his way back home after the massacre
Later when? because if we read surah 66 allah threatens his wives because they criticized his relationship with an unmarried woman. Allah even went to far he threatens them that he would gonna put them in hell
Is this allegorical like most of the bible or did he do that fr
at that time it was allowed to have intercourse with a slave with their permit they slowly started permitting rules if they had done everything all of a sudden people would rebel its quite logical
islam slowly imposed stuff
it was not sudden
Is that a kind of example that a man should follow and tell lies to his wives while cheating behind their back with a diff woman that he is not married to?
THis doesnt sound like a man who really loves his wives
he didnt lie to his wives
L bruh , Catholics and Orthodox are the only based ones lol
his wives were aware about her
all of this was already allowed at the time even in christianity
they slowly started imposing stuff
for people
wait a minute,, islam even forbids to ask the permission of wife to have intercourse.. it forces them to have sex with hubabnds.. but slaves get more rights than free muslim women?
this was the norm
nope
its a mutual consent
if either doesnt want to they dont
but allah also says
Ohh so he suddenly got caught and he said i promise i dont do that again, but couple of hours he wife came back home, and found him lying with his slave girl in her own bed
that if either the husband doesnt tc of their spousess needs they will be sinful
no they were already aware of it but they felt jealousy so the promised stopped and apologized to his wives but as per the law of the time it was allowed
this was a culture norm
and it wasnt introduced by islam
Aha mutual consent betwen a muslim man and his slaves, or a muslim and his wives?
Cause i can show you hadiths where prophet taught that a woman shouldnt' deny for intercourse, even if they are travelling on a camel's saddle. otherise angels will curse her till morning. That's called forcing and giving no option to reject it.
But you are saying consents with slaves.. slaves now seem getting more rights than free muslim women. But clealry it's not true 
i justified them
and u denied my justifications
ignoring my points
Too many Muslims and Christians here
so skill issue af
I will rp as a Hindu
WHy is he apolgizing if it was allowed?
He could jsut say it's allowed, makes no sense if it was so common
becz he was a soft hearted man
he did not want to hurt his wives sentiments
So God accepted the pagan culture norms?
god slowly iimposed the rules it wasnt restrained drastically
No he wasn't, we know he was laughing when he was wives were getting beaten 😭
sure bro
none of his wife ever got hurt
he took alot of care of em
Ahah but it was culture norms, it was so normal.. why would they get hurt?
skill issues aaa ignoring my points
Should i show you the hadiths?
human nature
Caring of them is that when Sawdah became old, when her beauty vanished away, he suddnely tried to divorce and started to spend more time with his young wives like Aisha
no false
surah or hadith please
i wont listen to ur imaginary examples
becz u dont use logic
and act like ur religion had restricted everything beforehand
islam imposed stuff in a very decent way
This is called taking care husband? Imagine when you get old and now your husband wants to divorce you and dating young women? Is that called very kind, gentle and take caring husband? sounds oppoiste tho 
Let me show you
proof hadith please or surah
Most men would do that though if they could 💀
they arent men then
pathetic losers
It's common 💔
he married a woman older than him
Read surah 4.128
And tafsir here is By Al Jalayan
And here Ibn Kathir
https://quranx.com/tafsirs/4.128
"This guy stitched together a Frankenstein of half-digested philosophy, pseudo-history of math, and appeals to shiny technology."
Nothing material to contradict my message.
" He confused axioms with evidence, science with math, and technological success with epistemic certainty "
Axioms are literally called 'self evident true statements'. Literally told why though for which he claimed to be 'pseudo history' 🤦🏻
Physics is branch of science and there's nothing without maths in it. So yes science use maths.
Yes, im fine with epistemic certainty if i someone comes to me and try to sell some afterlife schemes.
I'd love to ditch the psychological certainty in such case. I don't like delusions. Neither I'm crazy for 72 virgin houris.
Big shoutout to your minion @plush robin for contributing nothing. I've never seen someone can be so much wrong in his single message
Oh because she was so rich? if you look at descripion of Khadija, she is described as Elon Musk
So why would muhammad not marry her, cause we notice he was very poor.
Because at that time he hadn't had much power and access to young women*
she proposed her
ur opinion is rejected u got no surahs and proof
We talking about Sauda, no?
yes and he didnt reject her cause of her property and she was not even a good woman, she made her father drunk and married him. she decived her father because he rejected their marriage 🙂
😭 no lil bro
Yes
lmao tell me the hadith
There are plenty, I can collect them but it'll waste my time. Possibly in near future I'll compile a book
muslims not saudi
@glossy radish
oki sure
Swadah.. her name was swadah.
ohhhhhhhhh hes talking about the name

I didn't write saudi. But thanks @turbid ivy
yeah that one he is reffering too.. now, lemme ask you.. would you marry a man like muhammad, kind of a man when his wife became old, at the time she needed more care from her husband, he abonds her and wants to spend with women?
Is that called love? 
@glossy radish you know story of safiya bint? How he captured her and annihilated her whole tribe, including her husband and father
we CCP are way progressive than people who would really believe these religious fucking crap
please send me the hadith
and surah
yeah liberals are the most progressive group no doubt with that
womp womp
Yes very much
no becz muhammad wasnt that kinda man
u r wrong
womp womp with the F-35 on the sky ready to annihilate every terrorists
🇺🇸 Strength is our only belief
But the sources says he was that kinda of man.. even it's quoted from bhukhari
Plus, here are the sources that muhammad destroyed jewish tribe and forcefully married Saffiya bint huya
https://apologetics-101.com/muhammad-and-saffiya-muhammad-raped-saffiya-the-jewish-woman/
🙂
it's time to switch American values from diversity, equality, inclusive to strength, power, wealth
🇺🇸
God Bless The United States of America
bros jealous
tell me the surahs i wont read from ur sources
I ain't jealous that terrorists are dying on the fucking ground because they would believe it would help them as they continue this struggle by launching more terrorist attack
😭 ok bro illiterate shakespeare
bro comes under donald truck
we will see who's illterate under natural selection
imagine having donald truck as ur ruling ur country
don't worry
womp to the fucking womp 🤣
Hi
4.128
What are we discussing here
hiiii
Walakum salam
makes you remind this is the internet space of the USA
Hiii
Do you guys do hiking
this is American's internet territory under its sovereignty
it's better to ignore them, imo.
hi,
They are fighting
Where ar eyou from?
womp womp what should i do about it
good to push them
true
best of luck to you for it then!
no
it just says if a wife think her husband is pulling away or any of em thinks that they can other than divorce come to a mutual agreement of not being intimate......theres no mention of divorce nor any example of the prophet
no
KSA
you are arab
this too sigma
are you living outside of saudi?
why r u showing back pachs in here
for girls!
😭 is it that serious?
How?💀💀💀💀

It's very very very serious
More serious than debating religion to me
it is for women or teenager girls
bro why did everyone come here




